Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

Hypothesis Testing

This document presents two case studies on hypothesis testing. The first case evaluates the impact of a new online advertising campaign on daily sales, concluding that there is significant evidence of increased sales based on a p-value of 0.014. The second case assesses a new drug's effectiveness in lowering blood pressure, finding strong evidence for its efficacy with a p-value of 0.0015.

Uploaded by

kritikadixit004
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

Hypothesis Testing

This document presents two case studies on hypothesis testing. The first case evaluates the impact of a new online advertising campaign on daily sales, concluding that there is significant evidence of increased sales based on a p-value of 0.014. The second case assesses a new drug's effectiveness in lowering blood pressure, finding strong evidence for its efficacy with a p-value of 0.0015.

Uploaded by

kritikadixit004
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

CASE STUDY: :HYPOTHESIS TESTING

Case study1:

A retail company wants to test whether a new online advertising campaign increases the
average daily sales. Historically, the average daily sales were $10,000. After implementing the
new campaign for one month, they collect sales data and want to analyse if there’s a statistically
significant increase in daily sales.

Objective: To determine whether the new marketing strategy has increased the average daily
sales.

Step 1: Define the Hypotheses


• Null Hypothesis (H₀): The new campaign does not increase average daily sales.
H0: μ=10,000
• Alternate Hypothesis (H₁): The new campaign increases average daily sales.
H1: μ>10,000

This is a one-tailed (right-tailed) test because we're only interested in detecting an increase in
sales.

Step 2: Set the Significance Level

Let’s use a common significance level:

• α=0.05 (This means we're willing to accept a 5% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis
when it’s actually true.)

Step 3: Collect Data and Calculate the p-Value

Assume the company gathers 30 days of sales data post-campaign. The sample mean is $10,500
and the sample standard deviation is $1,200.

Using a one-sample t-test, the p-value is approximately 0.014.

Step 4: Interpret the Results

• p-value = 0.014 and α = 0.02


• Since p-value < α, we reject the null hypothesis.

Conclusion: There is statistically significant evidence at the 5% level to conclude that the
new marketing campaign increased average daily sales.

Ques: When do we reject the NULL hypothesis?

Answer:
If: p-value≤α
Then:

• Reject the null hypothesis (H₀)


• Accept the alternate hypothesis (H₁) as statistically supported (Fail to reject H0)

p-value = the probability of observing the sample results (or more extreme), assuming the null
hypothesis is true.

α (alpha) = your chosen threshold for significance (commonly 0.05, or 5%).

Example

p-value α Decision Interpretation

0.03 0.05 Reject H₀ There’s significant evidence to support H₁.

0.08 0.05 Fail to reject H₀ Not enough evidence to support H₁.

0.049 0.05 Reject H₀ Barely significant; still reject the null.

0.05 0.05 Often reject H₀ Right on the edge; depends on context or convention.

Case study2:

A pharmaceutical company has developed a new drug intended to lower blood pressure. The
average systolic blood pressure for patients with hypertension is known to be 150 mmHg. After
administering the new drug to a sample of patients, the company wants to test if the drug lowers
the average blood pressure.

Step 1: Define the Hypotheses


• Null Hypothesis (H₀): The drug does not lower blood pressure.
H0:μ=150
• Alternate Hypothesis (H₁): The drug lowers blood pressure.
H1:μ<150
This is a left-tailed test because we're testing for a decrease.

Step 2: Choose the Significance Level

• Let’s use α=0.01(very strict, common in medical studies).

Step 3: Collect Data

• After treating 40 patients, the average systolic blood pressure is found to be 145 mmHg,
with a standard deviation of 10 mmHg.

From a t-distribution table or calculator, the p-value is approximately 0.0015.

Step 4: Decision Rule

• p-value = 0.0015

• α = 0.01

Since p-value < α, we reject the null hypothesis.


Conclusion

There is strong statistical evidence at the 1% level to conclude that the new drug significantly
lowers blood pressure.

Component Details

Context Testing if a new drug lowers average systolic blood pressure

Population Mean (μ₀) 150 mmHg (known average for hypertensive patients)

Sample Mean (x̄) 145 mmHg

Sample Size (n) 40 patients

Sample Std. Dev (s) 10 mmHg


Component Details

Test Type One-sample t-test (left-tailed)

Significance Level (α) 0.01 (1%)

Hypothesis Statement

Null Hypothesis (H₀) μ = 150

Alternate Hypothesis (H₁) μ < 150 (drug lowers BP)

Statistic Value

p-value 0.0015 (approx.)

Criteria Result

p-value <= α 0.0015 < 0.01

Conclusion Reject H₀

Interpretation Strong evidence the drug lowers blood pressure

You might also like