Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies

ISSN (Online): 2583-3340

Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

Application and Software Security: Studying How to Secure

Applications and Software from Vulnerabilities and Attacks
Mustafa Ahmed Othman Abo Mhara1 and Abdullah Abdulsalam Abdulqadir Abdulrahman2
1
Department of Electronics Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Bani Waleed University, LIBYA.
2
Higher Institute of Engineering Technologies Baniwalid, LIBYA.
1
Corresponding Author: [email protected]

www.sjmars.com || Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): April Issue

Date of Submission: 30-03-2022 Date of Acceptance: 25-04-2022 Date of Publication: 30-04-2022

ABSTRACT

Application and software security are essential for protecting digital systems from a growing multitude of attacks. With
the advancement of technology, application vulnerabilities have emerged as a main target for attackers, resulting in substantial
financial, operational, and reputational harm. This research examines critical elements of application security, including
prevalent vulnerabilities, attack routes, threat models, and the tools and technologies used to minimize risks. It emphasizes the
need of incorporating security measures throughout the software development lifecycle (SDLC) and complying with legal
frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. The study investigates difficulties such the growing complexity of
applications, accelerated development cycles, and the evolving threat environment, necessitating enterprises to implement
proactive security strategies. Recommendations include the adoption of safe coding standards, use of sophisticated security tools,
improvement of authentication procedures, and promotion of a security-oriented culture via education and cooperation. This
research underscores the need for a holistic and flexible strategy to guarantee the resilience of applications against emerging
cyber threats.

Keywords- GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, software security, vulnerabilities and attacks.

I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Need of Preventive Security Policies
At a time when digital systems enable most modern life, it is hard to exaggerate the relevance of proactive
security measures in application and software development. Using modern technologies like machine learning (ML) and
artificial intelligence (AI) to take advantage of software faults, cyberattacks are become more complicated. Having a
reactive approach—where security is only taken care of after an attack—is insufficient. Organizations must be proactive to
predict, recognize, and remove any hazards before they have an opportunity to do harm.
1.1.1. Cyber Threats' Dynamic Character
Cyberthreats are continually evolving and hackers are seeking fresh approaches to access systems. To get beyond
accepted security protocols, hacking techniques include ransomware, phishing, and zero-day vulnerabilities are continually
under development. For instance, a zero-day vulnerability might let programs be accessed by attackers until a remedy is
developed and applied[1]. Teams in security and developers are not aware of this vulnerability. Early identification and
fixing of potential software development lifecycle vulnerabilities helps businesses to lower the window of risk by means of
proactive security strategies.
1.1.2. Reactive Security: Its Limitations
Repairing damage after a breach is the main emphasis of reactive security, which might have major effects like
data loss, company stoppage, and damage of one's reputation. Responding to a breach might also have a high cost
including fines, attorneys' fees, and recovery costs[2]. Conversely, many of these events might be prevented with proactive
66 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
ISSN (Online): 2583-3340
Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

measures such safe coding practices, regular vulnerability checks, and penetration testing, therefore reducing overall risks
and costs.
1.1.2. Including security into the process of development
Preventive security is mostly dependent on include security at every stage of the software development life
(SDLC). Unlike delaying these activities until post-deployment, the "shift-left security" approach gives the detection and
mitigating of vulnerabilities top priority throughout the development phase[3]. This covers doing code reviews to find
unsafe coding methods.
• Using automated methods for both dynamic and stationary code analysis.
• Encouragement of developers to follow safe coding guidelines.
These steps not only increase security but also cut the time and money required to solve issues later on.
1.2. The Part Advanced Security Tools and Techniques Play
To outperform attackers, proactive security relies much on advanced tools and technologies. While penetration
testing tools imitate real attacks to expose probable access points, vulnerability scanners may independently identify
software issues[4]. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are increasingly used to find anomalies in system behavior,
therefore helping companies to solve problems before they become more severe. These technologies help security teams to
have a strong defensive posture against quickly evolving risks.
1.2.1. Legal and Compliance Pressures
Many industries run under strict laws that need thorough security policies to protect private data. Laws requiring
businesses to employ proactive approaches to prevent breaches include the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)[5]. Ignoring rules might result in large penalties,
hence proactive security not only makes sense but also a legal need.
1.2.2. Preventing Harm to Reputation
Apart from the financial expenses, security breaches might erode public trust and damage the reputation of a
company. Customers and stakeholders want businesses to focus on data security of their systems[6]. Active security
policies show a commitment to safeguarding user data, thereby building and maintaining digital age trust. Growing
complexity of cyber threats, the shortcomings of reactive techniques, and the increasing reliance on software in critical
operations all point to the necessity of proactive security measures[7]. Businesses may greatly increase their defenses
against attacks by anticipating foreseeable hazards, adding security into the development process, and using new
technology. This approach preserves trust in a technologically driven world, protects digital assets, and ensures regulatory
compliance.
1.3. Research Goals
The aim of this work is to investigate the ideas and methods of application and software security, therefore
providing a thorough examination of:
• Common vulnerabilities and their effects on software systems.
• New dangers as well as attacker strategies.
• Best practices and tools for spotting and reducing security vulnerabilities;
• Difficulties developers and companies confront in safeguarding programs.
Investigating these facets helps the study to provide practical understanding of the developing area of software
security and support the creation of more robust systems.
1.4. Study Significance
Directing developers, security professionals, and companies in the use of strict security measures depends on this
research. The understanding of application and software security has become increasingly important as legislation like
GDPR and HIPAA enforce strict data protection needs. Moreover, as digital transformation advances, the findings of this
study will be very important in helping companies protect their software systems from growing threats.

II. METHODOLOGY
The methodology of this work is to investigate the ideas and methods of application and software security in their
whole. The research aims to methodically find common weaknesses, assess possible risks, and assess the effectiveness of
present security systems. The research design, tools, approaches, and standards used to meet the objectives of the study are
delineated in this part.
2.1. Research Strategy
This work employs a mixed-methods research approach combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to
provide a whole understanding of application and software security.
Examining academic literature, industry reports, and case studies under a qualitative approach helps one to
evaluate present knowledge and identify trends in application vulnerabilities and threats.
Empirical data on software vulnerabilities and attacks is statistically analyzed using a quantitative approach to
evaluate frequency, severity, and impact of security events.

67 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
ISSN (Online): 2583-3340
Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

2.2. Methods of Data Acquisition

The research guarantees a comprehensive review by using both main and secondary data sources.
Examining case studies from companies that have discovered software flaws or breaches helps one to understand the
causes and effects of security lapses. Talking with software developers and cybersecurity experts reveals modern methods
and challenges.
Primary Data: To improve the outcome of main study, information is acquired from reliable sources such
cybersecurity news, vulnerability databases (e.g., CVE, NVD), and peer-reviewed papers.
2.3. Tools and Technology
Several tools and technologies are used in this study to assess security measures' weaknesses. These tools in static
analysis evaluate source code for vulnerabilities without executing the application.
- These include Checkmarx and SonarQube.
- Dynamic analysis tools examine live applications to identify weaknesses.
Statistical analysis and quantitative data visualization are accomplished using Python and R among data analysis
tools.
2.4. Assessment Guidelines
The following factors help one assess the effectiveness of security policies:
Detection Rate: Instruments and techniques' ability to accurately find weaknesses.
False positives and negatives: How much tools mistakenly find or ignore weaknesses?
The degree to which passed laws reduce the possible damage from attacks is known as impact mitigating.
Cost-effectiveness: The balance between security measure expense and degree of protection obtained.
Using advanced tools and empirical data, the method combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to fully
analyze application and software security[8]. By combining theoretical research with real-world testing to enhance
software system security, the initiative aims to provide developers, businesses, and legislators practical insights.

III. TYPES OF SOFTWARE VULNERABILITIES

Software vulnerabilities are deficiencies or imperfections in a system that may be exploited by attackers to get
unauthorized access, disrupt operations, or expropriate sensitive information. These vulnerabilities stem from deficiencies
in software design, implementation, or configuration. Comprehending the many categories of software vulnerabilities is
crucial for formulating efficient security strategies[9]. This section classifies prevalent vulnerabilities, offers instances, and
underscores their possible consequences.

Table 1. Common Types of Software Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability Type Description Examples
Occur when untrusted input is sent to an
Injection Attacks SQL injection, Command injection
interpreter as part of a command or query.
Cross-Site Scripting Allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into
Stored XSS, Reflected XSS
(XSS) web pages viewed by other users.
Occur when a program writes more data to a buffer
Buffer Overflows Stack overflow, Heap overflow
than it can hold, leading to memory corruption.
Weak authentication mechanisms allow Password reuse, Hardcoded
Insecure Authentication
unauthorized access to systems. credentials
Exploitation of vulnerabilities in the
Insecure Deserialization Object injection, Data tampering
deserialization process to execute malicious code.
Flaws that allow attackers to bypass authorization Privilege escalation, Unauthorized
Broken Access Control
checks. access

3.1. Vulnerabilities in injection

When an interpreter receives untrusted data as part of a command or query, injection risks arise. Attackers take
advantage of this by inserting malicious code to change an application's behavior.
• SQL Injection: To see, edit, or remove database records, attackers alter SQL queries.
Example: Customer information obtained from inadequately protected e-commerce databases without authorization.
• Command Injection: Using flaws to run arbitrary commands on the system.
Example: Using malicious input in command-line interfaces to compromise web servers.
Impact: Possible system compromise, illegal access, and data breaches.
2.3. XSS, or cross-site scripting
Attackers may insert dangerous scripts into websites that other users are seeing thanks to XSS vulnerabilities.
Cookies, session tokens, and other private data may be stolen by these programs.
68 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
ISSN (Online): 2583-3340
Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

• Reflected XSS: When a user clicks on a link that contains a malicious script, the script is launched.
• Stored XSS: Web pages that include malicious scripts are sent to users after being stored on a server.
Impact: User confidence is harmed, personal data is stolen, and sessions are hijacked.
3.3. Overflow of Buffers
When a software writes more data to a buffer (temporary storage space) than it can handle, it causes buffer
overflow, which corrupts nearby memory.
• Stack-Based Buffer Overflow: This kind of exploit uses the stack memory to run arbitrary code.
• Heap-Based Buffer Overflow: Changing dynamic memory to cause problems for a program.
Impact: Unauthorized code execution, application failures, and even system takeover.
3.4. Session management and authentication issues
Attackers may be able to pose as authorized users due to flaws in authentication or session management
systems[10].
• Weak password regulations or inadequate encryption techniques are examples of password vulnerabilities.
Theft of session IDs in order to gain access to user accounts is known as session hijacking.
Impact: Data breaches and unauthorized access to private accounts.
3.5. Misconfigured Security
Applications, servers, or databases that are not setup securely expose themselves to attackers. This is known as a
security misconfiguration.
• Default Credentials: Employing usernames and passwords that are pre-configured.
• Superfluous Features Activated: maintaining active any idle ports, services, or accounts.
Impact: A larger attack surface that might result in data leaks and illegal access.
3.6. Deserialization that is not safe
Deserialization is the process of transforming data into a format that may be used. When hackers insert harmful
code into serialized objects, this is known as insecure deserialization.
• As an example, consider using Java-based apps' deserialization vulnerabilities to run arbitrary code.
Impact: Application breach, privilege escalation, and remote code execution.
3.7. Inadequate Security for Cryptography
Sensitive information may be made available to attackers via weak or badly constructed cryptography techniques.
• Using antiquated algorithms: MD5 and SHA-1 are examples of algorithms that are no longer safe.
• Inadequate Key Management: Inadequately secured key storage or weak encryption keys.
Impact: Noncompliance with regulatory norms and the disclosure of private information.
3.8. The Escalation of Privilege
When hackers take use of flaws to get more access privileges than they intended, this is known as privilege
escalation.
- Getting access to the information or rights of another user is known as horizontal escalation.
- Obtaining root or administrative rights is known as vertical escalation.
Impact: Complete command of systems, illegal access to data, and tampering with vital resources.
3.9. Outdated or unpatched software
When security updates are not installed or outdated software is utilized, systems are vulnerable to known attacks.
For instance, the WannaCry ransomware attack exploited a vulnerability in Windows machines that were out of date.
Impact: Data loss as a result of known vulnerabilities being exploited or ransomware attacks.
3.10. Inadequately secure APIs If APIs (Application Programming Interfaces)
Application Programming Interfaces are not properly secured, systems may be subject to attacks. For instance,
API endpoints with insufficient encryption or authentication might allow hackers to change data or services.
Impact: Unauthorized access to backend systems and data manipulation.
The availability, confidentiality, and integrity of digital systems are seriously threatened by software defects[10].
By identifying and understanding these vulnerabilities, developers and security professionals may use targeted strategies to
lower risks and enhance application security. Finding and addressing these flaws early in the software development
lifecycle is crucial to maintaining reliable and secure systems in an increasingly digital world.

Table 2: Classification of Vulnerabilities by Impact

Category Impact on Systems Example Vulnerabilities
Unauthorized access to sensitive
Confidentiality Breaches SQL Injection, Insecure Authentication
information.
Unauthorized modification of data or Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Buffer
Integrity Violations
systems. Overflow
Denial of Service (DoS), Resource
Availability Issues Disruption of services or denial of access.
Exhaustion

69 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
ISSN (Online): 2583-3340
Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

Accountability Challenges in tracking user actions or

Weak Audit Trails, Logging Failures
Weaknesses attacks.

Effective mitigating of software vulnerabilities depends on an awareness of their many forms. Organizing
vulnerabilities according to their causes and effects helps companies to prioritize security initiatives, apply preventative
actions, and guarantee strong application protection.

IV. SECURITY POLICIES AND STANDARD PRACTICES

Ensuring the security of software applications is a multifarious difficulty requiring a mix of technological
solutions, strategic planning, and adherence to best practices. While best practices provide direction to avoid vulnerabilities
and reduce risks, security measures are proactive activities and tools meant to secure systems. This part looks at important
security policies and the best practices companies and developers might follow to improve application security.
4.1. Safe Coding Methodologies
The basis of application security is secure code, which emphasizes on creating software with strong protections
against typical vulnerabilities.
- Valuate all user inputs to eliminate buffer overflows and injection attacks[11].
- Correct error management can help you to prevent revealing private data.
- Least privilege is the principle wherein code execution rights are limited to the minimum needed.
Following accepted safe code guidelines like those described by the Open Web Application Security Project
(OWASP) is best practice.
4.2. Applying Libraries and Security Frameworks
Libraries and security systems provide pre-made tools and approaches to fix typical weaknesses.
- Install access control and authentication using frameworks like Spring Security or Django.
- For encryption and hash, depend on proven cryptographic libraries such OpenSSL or Bcrypt.
Best Practice: Frequent updates of frameworks and libraries to their most recent versions help to fix discovered
vulnerabilities.
4.3. Authorizing and Verification Systems
Protection of user accounts and sensitive data depends critically on strong authentication and authorization
procedures. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) calls for access via many credentials—e.g., a one-time code in addition to
a password[12]. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is: Restrain user rights depending on responsibilities. Strong
password rules should be followed best practice, hence plaintext passwords should not be stored.
4.4. Data Protection and Encryption
- Sensitive data encrypted guarantees its anonymity during transmission and storage.
- TLS, or transport layer security, can help you to protect data en route.
- Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) techniques help to encrypt private data at rest.
Best Practice: Steer clear of employing SHA-1 or MD5 antiquated encryption methods.
4.5. Frequent Vulnerability Reviews
Regular vulnerability assessments assist to identify and reduce any hazards. Analyze source code for
vulnerabilities using static application security testing (SAST), without running it.
- Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is executing security problem tests.
- Integration of automated vulnerability scanners into the software development life is best practice.
4.6. DevSecOps Implementation
DevSecOps encourages constant security at all phases of software development by integrating security principles
into the DevOps process.
- CI/CD pipelines let you automate security checks.
- Encourage cooperation among the teams in operations, security, and development.
Regular training of development teams in safe coding and threat mitigating techniques is best practice.
4.7. Penetration Investigation
Simulating actual assaults in penetration testing helps to find weaknesses and assess the efficacy of security
systems[13].
- Focus on weaknesses vulnerable to outside attackers in your testing.
- Evaluate internal testing hazards related to insider threats.
Best Practice: Test penetration periodically and after significant program changes.
4.8. Monitoring and Incident Reaction
Good monitoring and incident response systems help companies to see and handle security events right away.
- Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) help you spot dubious behavior.
- Create a disciplined incident response plan (IRP) to limit and lessen breaches.

70 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
ISSN (Online): 2583-3340
Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

Best Practice: Track application logs and network traffic always looking for irregularities.
Organizations may greatly lower their risk exposure and safeguard their applications against malevolent attacks
by following best practices and putting in place thorough security procedures. Every stage of the software development life
should include these techniques to guarantee that security is not only a top priority but also a fundamental part of program
design and running. Maintaining pace with the changing threat scene depends on regular assessments and security strategy
revisions.

V. APPLICATION SECURITY TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGIES

To identify, stop, and lessen vulnerabilities, application security mostly depends on specialized tools and
technology. These technologies help security experts and engineers protect software systems from different attacks[14].
The main types of application security tools and technologies are described in this section along with their functions in
safeguarding applications.
5.1. Tools for Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
SAST tools examine bytecode, binaries, or source code without running the program. Early in the software
development lifecycle (SDLC), they aid in the identification of vulnerabilities. Veracode, Checkmarx, and SonarQube are a
few examples. Features include the ability to identify unsafe coding techniques.
- Make practical suggestions for developers.
- Connect to continuous scanning processes using CI/CD.
Benefits: Time and money spent on remediation are decreased when vulnerabilities are discovered early.
5.2. Testing Tools for Dynamic Application Security (DAST)
DAST technologies find vulnerabilities in real-world scenarios by testing running apps. To find security
vulnerabilities, they mimic assaults. OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, and Acunetix are a few examples. Features include the
ability to detect runtime vulnerabilities like cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection.
- Test APIs and web apps.
- Provide thorough vulnerability reports along with advice on how to fix them.
Benefits: Provide information on vulnerabilities that could only manifest while an application is running.
5.3. RASP Tools (Runtime Application Self-Protection)
RASP technologies identify and mitigate risks in real time while monitoring and safeguarding applications during
runtime. Examples are Prevoty and Contrast Security.
- Features include the ability to identify and stop harmful activity inside the program.
- Continually safeguard without interfering with business as usual.
Benefits: Applications are more resilient when threats are mitigated in real time.
5.4. Tools for Penetration Testing
Penetration testing tools evaluate the strength of security measures by simulating cyberattacks. Examples include
Core Impact, Nessus, and Metasploit.
- Check for vulnerabilities like as injection attacks and privilege escalation.
- Find application and infrastructure misconfigurations.
Benefits: Offer information on potential ways for attackers to take advantage of weaknesses.
5.5. Scanners for vulnerabilities
Vulnerability scanners automatically find holes in systems, networks, and applications' security. Nessus, Qualys,
and OpenVAS are a few examples.
- The ability to check for unpatched vulnerabilities, obsolete software, and unsafe setups.
- Make cleanup plans a priority.
Benefits: Consistent scanning guarantees ongoing observation and prompt identification of vulnerabilities.
5.6. Firewalls for Web Applications (WAFs)
Web application firewalls (WAFs) guard against malicious requests by filtering and monitoring HTTP traffic.
AWS WAF, Cloudflare, and Imperva are a few examples.
- Preventing DDoS, SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS) threats.
- Provide real-time monitoring and customized security policies.
Benefits: Serve as a first layer of protection for web apps, thwarting attacks before they get to the server.
5.7. Platforms for Threat Intelligence
Threat intelligence solutions help companies stay ahead of attackers by gathering and analyzing data about upcoming
and existing threats. ThreatConnect and Recorded Future are two examples.
- Offer information on trends in global threats.
- By recognizing assault indications, preemptive protection is made possible.
Benefits: Use current threat information to improve security plans.

71 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
ISSN (Online): 2583-3340
Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

5.8. Tools for Container Security

Tools for protecting container environments are becoming crucial due to the increasing use of containerized
applications.
- Snyk, Twistlock, and Aqua Security are a few examples.
- Features include the ability to check container images for vulnerabilities.
- Keep an eye out for irregularities in runtime behavior.
Benefits: Assure security in containerized systems and contemporary DevOps operations.
5.9. Instruments for Identity and Access Management (IAM)
To safeguard critical resources, IAM tools control user identities, responsibilities, and access rights.
- Okta, Microsoft Azure AD, and Ping Identity are a few examples.
- Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) as one of the features.
- Control access based on roles (RBAC).
Benefits: Lowers the possibility of insider threats and illegal access.
5.10. Safe Platforms for Development
Teams may create safe apps from the ground up with the aid of platforms designed to include security throughout
the development process.
- GitLab Secure and GitHub Advanced Security are two examples.
- Features include automated vulnerability and code screening, as well as seamless workflow integration with
development tools.
Benefits: Instruct development teams to prioritize security always.
Applications may be protected against constantly changing threats with the help of the technologies and
techniques mentioned above[15]. Organizations may improve the resilience of their applications, safeguard sensitive data,
and guarantee regulatory compliance by using these technologies in conjunction with secure development techniques.
Integrating cutting-edge technology like blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) will be essential to keeping ahead of
cybercriminals as the threat environment changes.

VI. REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORKS

Ensuring that software programs are safe becomes not just a technical but also a legal and regulatory need as
cyber hazards change. Different regulatory systems and compliance criteria have been developed to direct businesses in
putting strong security policies, safeguarding private information, and lowering risk into effect. The main regulatory and
compliance systems that affect application security are discussed in this part along with ways in which companies could
match their operations with these criteria.
6.1. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Aiming at safeguarding personal data and privacy, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a European
Union law. It lays rigorous guidelines on data collecting, handling, storing, and distributing. Security should be included
into the design of systems and applications both by default and by design.
Minimizing data means gathering just what is absolutely required and guaranteeing its security.
Users have the right to demand that their personal information be deleted—that is, their right to be forgotten. To meet
GDPR's data protection requirements, companies have to put strong data encryption, access control systems, and safe data
storage techniques into use.
- Act on Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA)
- A U.S. law, HIPAA controls the safeguarding of private patient health information (PHI).
It lays guidelines for the security of electronic health records (EHR) and describes how healthcare institutions
have to guard patient information.
Key Need:
- Execute procedures meant to guarantee PHI's protection administratively.
- Safe physical access to systems for storing healthcare data.
- Employ access control systems and encryption to protect EHRs technically.
- Strong encryption for sending and storing PHI, access restrictions to limit data access to authorised users, and
audit logs to track data access and any breaches are only three of the requirements for application security.
6.3 PCI DSS, or Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard,
Globally, the PCI DSS is a standard meant to guarantee that any business handling credit card data has safe
surroundings. It is embraced somewhat extensively by companies engaged in financial operations. Make sure credit card
data is safely kept and sent using robust encryption. Restricted access to payment systems depending on jobs and
responsibilities. To identify and handle such hazards, do frequent security testing, vulnerability assessments, and
monitoring. Applications handling payment data have to provide end-to-end encryption, safe tokenizing of cardholder data,
and adherence to frequent vulnerability scans and assessments.

72 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
ISSN (Online): 2583-3340
Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

The Federal Information Security Management Act, or FISMA, government laws pertaining to information
systems used by government agencies and contractors, FISMA is a U.S. federal legislation with security requirements
mandated by it. To safeguard government data, an all-encompassing information security approach must be implemented.
Important Need:
- Frequent risk analyses help to spot possible hazards and weaknesses.
- Apply security measures based on National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recommendations.
- Make sure systems are continuously under observation for security events and issues.
- Federal apps have to satisfy NIST security criteria and go under constant observation and testing to guarantee FISMA
compliance with criteria.
6.4 The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
California state law, the CCPA gives its citizens certain rights over their personal data including the right
to know what data is being gathered, the right to access it, and the right to remove it.
Key Needs:
- Tell customers about the kinds of information gathered and how it will be used.
- Let customers ask to have access to their data or have its erasure.
- Do not discriminate against customers who use their privacy rights; non-discriminatory policies.
- To satisfy the privacy requirements of the CCPA, companies have to use clear data access procedures, encryption, and
safe data storage.
6.5 SOX, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
A U.S. law, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act demands corporate governance and financial disclosure rules
including recordkeeping and security of financial systems.
Important Conditions:
- Install robust internal controls to stop financial record access without authorization and fraud.
- Maintaining correct records, provide an audit trail for every financial transaction.
- Verify the integrity of financial data and guarantee against illegal changes its protection.
- Financial applications have to provide thorough audit logs to meet with SOX criteria, tight access control methods,
and encryption of private financial data.
6.6 Cybersecurity Framework of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework offers direction on how to improve the security of important
infrastructure. Though it is not a rule, it is generally accepted as the ideal for cybersecurity risk control.
Important Need:
- Create a cybersecurity risk-managing plan here.
- Put protective policies into action to defend important resources.
- Look constantly for security breaches.
- Respond and recover from an occurrence by means of a strategy.
Emphasizing risk identification, important data protection, breach detection, and response system implementation,
organizations should match their application security strategy with NIST's recommendations.
6.7. Standard Guidelines and Best Practices generally
Apart from particular laws, companies have to follow broad industry standards and best practices for application
security. These entail:
- Standard ISO/IEC 27001 for building, running, monitoring, and enhancing an information security management
system (ISMS).
- The ten most important web application security vulnerabilities, compiled by OWASP Top Ten, provide direction for
creating safe apps.
- A collection of cybersecurity best practices meant to guard companies from the most ubiquitous assaults, CIS controls
Essential rules for protecting private information, guaranteeing privacy, and reducing security risks in use
development and deployment are offered by regulatory and compliance frameworks. Following these rules helps
companies not only stay out of legal hotlines but also build their reputation and guarantee client confidence. Compliance
should be seen as a continual commitment requiring constant security practice upgrading to keep ahead of developing
hazards and changing regulatory requirements.

VII. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

7.1 Conclusion
In the digital scene of today, where cyberthreats are always changing, application and software security are very
essential. As technology develops, so do the techniques used by malevolent players to take advantage of weaknesses in
programs. Organizations now have to provide strong security; it is not a choice; it is a need to safeguard private
information, keep user confidence, and follow legal requirements. Important facets of application security—including

73 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
ISSN (Online): 2583-3340
Volume-1 Issue-2 || April 2022 || PP. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.2.9

common vulnerabilities, attack routes, threat models, security policies, and legal frameworks—have come under close
attention in this paper. Good security calls for a proactive, all-encompassing strategy combining best practices, modern
technologies, and knowledge of the threat environment all through the software development life. Notwithstanding these
efforts, security of software is a continuous struggle against changing cyberthreats, fast development cycles, and growing
complexity of programs. Organizations have to be dedicated to ongoing development and adaptation if they are to be
strong against challenges.
7.2 Suggestions
The following ideas are suggested to solve the many difficulties in application and software security:
- Using safe coding standards will help to reduce vulnerabilities at the source. Add security as the fundamental
element of the Software Development Lifeline (SDLC).
- Comprehensive vulnerability evaluations may be accomplished using tools for both static and dynamic application
security testing (SAST and DAST respectively). Automate security testing in CI/CD systems to find and fix
problems right away.
- Using multi-factor authentication (MFA) will help to improve access restrictions. Restrain rights depending on
user responsibilities using role-based access control (RBAC).
- Teach users, staff, and developers on recommended practices and newly developing security concerns.
- Offer specific instruction on vulnerability management and safe coding. Create a thorough incident response
strategy five times over.
- Plan in order to handle and bounce back from security events. Frequent exercises help to guarantee readiness for
actual assaults.

REFERENCES
[1] M. Tatam, B. Shanmugam, S. Azam and K. Kannoorpatti, "A review of threat modelling approaches for APT-style
attacks", Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 1, Jan. 2021.
[2] M. Niazi, A. M. Saeed, M. Alshayeb, S. Mahmood and S. Zafar, "A maturity model for secure requirements
engineering", Comput. Secur., vol. 95, Aug. 2020.
[3] M. Zhang, X. D. C. D. Carnavalet, L. Wang and A. Ragab, "Large-scale empirical study of important features
indicative of discovered vulnerabilities to assess application security", IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 14,
no. 9, pp. 2315-2330, Sep. 2019.
[4] G. McGraw, "Six tech trends impacting software security", Computer, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 100-102, May 2017.
[5] J. C. S. Nunez, A. C. Lindo and P. G. Rodriguez, "A preventive secure software development model for a software
factory: A case study", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 77653-77665, 2020.
[6] S. Von Solms and L. A. Futcher, "Adaption of a secure software development methodology for secure engineering
design", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 125630-125637, 2020.
[7] M. Z. Gunduz and R. Das, "Cyber-security on smart grid: Threats and potential solutions", Comput. Netw., vol. 169,
Mar. 2020.
[8] J. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Chen and Y. Xiang, "Secure attribute-based data sharing for resource-limited users in cloud
computing", Comput. Secur., vol. 72, pp. 1-12, Jan. 2018.
[9] W. Khreich, S. S. Murtaza, A. Hamou-Lhadj and C. Talhi, "Combining heterogeneous anomaly detectors for
improved software security", J. Syst. Softw., vol. 137, pp. 415-429, Mar. 2018.
[10] S. Hosseinzadeh, S. Rauti, S. Laurén and J.-M. Mäkelä, "Diversification and obfuscation techniques for software
security: A systematic literature review", Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 104, pp. 72-93, Dec. 2018.
[11] E. K. Szczepaniuk, H. Szczepaniuk, T. Rokicki and B. Klepacki, "Information security assessment in public
administration", Comput. Secur., vol. 90, Mar. 2020.
[12] M. A. Akbar, A. Alsanad, S. Mahmood and A. Alothaim, "A multicriteria decision making taxonomy of IoT
security challenging factors", IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 128841-128861, 2021.
[13] R. Khan, "Secure software development: A prescriptive framework", Comput. Fraud Secur., vol. 2011, no. 8, pp.
12-20, Aug. 2011.
[14] D. Mellado, C. Blanco, L. E. Sánchez and E. Fernández-Medina, "A systematic review of security requirements
engineering", Comput. Standards Interfaces, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 153-165, 2010.
[15] Velásquez, A. Caro and A. Rodríguez, "Authentication schemes and methods: A systematic literature review", Inf.
Softw. Technol., vol. 94, pp. 30-37, Feb. 2018.

74 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)