Basic Structure Doctrine of the Indian Constitution
Origin of the Doctrine
The doctrine was first clearly articulated by the Supreme Court of India in the Kesavananda Bharati
v. State of Kerala (1973) case. In this landmark judgment, a 13-judge bench ruled (by a 7-6 majority)
that:
Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution, but it cannot alter or destroy its 'basic
structure'.
Key Features of the Basic Structure Doctrine
The doctrine is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. Instead, it has evolved through judicial
interpretation. The Supreme Court has held that the following elements form part of the basic
structure:
1. Supremacy of the Constitution
2. Rule of law
3. Separation of powers
4. Judicial review
5. Federalism
6. Secularism
7. Sovereign, Democratic, and Republic character of the Indian polity
8. Unity and integrity of the nation
9. Free and fair elections
10. Independence of the judiciary
11. Fundamental Rights
12. Parliamentary system of government
These elements are illustrative, not exhaustive. The Supreme Court decides what forms the basic
Basic Structure Doctrine of the Indian Constitution
structure based on the case and context.
Significance of the Doctrine
- Limits Parliamentary power: It acts as a check on the power of Parliament to amend the
Constitution.
- Preserves democracy: It ensures that the core principles of the Constitution remain intact,
protecting India's democratic framework.
- Ensures judicial supremacy: It reinforces the role of the judiciary as the guardian of the
Constitution.
Major Cases Related to the Doctrine
1. Shankari Prasad (1951) and Sajjan Singh (1965) - Initially held that Parliament had the power to
amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights.
2. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab (1967) - Ruled that Parliament could not amend Fundamental
Rights.
3. Kesavananda Bharati (1973) - Introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, balancing parliamentary
power and constitutional supremacy.
4. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Declared that judicial review and democracy are part of the
basic structure.
5. Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) - Strengthened the doctrine by reaffirming limits on
Parliament's amending power.
Conclusion
The Basic Structure Doctrine is a unique contribution of Indian constitutional jurisprudence. It
Basic Structure Doctrine of the Indian Constitution
preserves the identity and philosophy of the Constitution, ensuring that amendments do not
compromise its fundamental character.