Assignment Unit 2 Response

Introduction

Often times in several years as I walk through tech world, I have asked so many silent questions

and in the past two modules, it has been interesting to now see these silent questions of mine

being answered. Questions such as how does this internet moves across globe? how does files

move from pc to pc without collision? How does voice travels through the internet? These and

many more. This week’s lessons have opened my knowledge to all these, visualizing and

analyzing transmission of data processes also getting to understand the concepts of different

multiplexing techniques.

Analyzing Line Coding Schemes

When comparing line coding schemes, the focus should be to ensure reliable data transmission

and also the ability to mitigate interference. Starting with Manchester Encoding; Manchester

encoding, which uses a self-clocking system and represents each bit with a transition in the

middle of the bit period, guarantees dependable data transfer. Because bit boundaries may be

easily detected, this aids in interference mitigation.

Differential Manchester Encoding

Manchester encoding, however, uses twice as much bandwidth as the original signal, which may

be problematic in settings when bandwidth is scarce.

Additionally, differential Manchester encoding guarantees dependable data transfer and offers

self-clocking. In contrast to Manchester encoding, it represents data via transitions at the start of

the bit period. Because it removes the need for a separate clock signal and makes bit boundary

detection simple, this approach effectively mitigates interference.

NRZ encoding uses two separate voltage levels to encode binary 0 and 1. It does not have a self-

clocking mechanism, which might lead to synchronization issues and sensitivity to interference.

Because of its vulnerability to synchronization issues, NRZ encoding might not be the best

option in settings with high levels of electromagnetic interference.

Justifying Line Coding Scheme for Manufacturing plant

Differential Manchester Encoding would be the best line coding system given the manufacturing

plant's high levels of electromagnetic interference. Self-clocking is a feature of this method that

makes it easier to detect bit boundaries and reduces interference. Additionally, its ability to

eliminate the requirement for a separate clock signal makes it a resilient alternative for the tough

electromagnetic environment.

Transmission Media Comparison

 Twisted Pair

Transmission Distance: This is Suitable for short to medium distances.

Bandwidth: This has limited bandwidth compared to coaxial cable and fiber-optic cable.

Cost: This is Relatively low cost when comparing it to coaxial and fiber-optic cables.

Susceptibility to Interference: it is Moderately susceptibility to interference in environments with

significant electromagnetic interference.

 Coaxial Cable

Transmission Distance: It is Suitable for medium distances.

tasks.

Cost: It has a moderate cost, higher than twisted pair.

Susceptibility to Interference: This has moderate susceptibility to interference, but better

shielding compared to twisted pair.

 Fiber-Optic Cable

Bandwidth: Has High bandwidth among the three options, it is ideal for high-speed internet

access and data-intensive tasks.

Transmission Distance: it is Suitable for a very long distance and doesn’t cause signal

degradation.

Cost: This has high initial cost, but offers long-term cost savings due to its performance and

durability when in use.

Susceptibility to Interference: this is immune to electromagnetic interference, making it highly

reliable and efficient.

Appropriate Transmission Media for Various Office Network

Connecting Workstations: Because twisted pair cables are affordable and suitable for short to

medium distances, they can be utilized to connect workstations in an office setting.

Establishing Backbone Connections: Fiber-optic cables, which offer high bandwidth and

interference immunity for dependable data transfer, are best suited for creating backbone

connections throughout the office complex.

Linking to External Service Providers: Coaxial cables provide a cost-effective solution by

balancing bandwidth, transmission distance, and other factors.

Time Division Multiplexing (TDM)

Scalability: Can be less scalable compared to FDM, especially when the number of signals to be

multiplexed increases.

Bandwidth Allocation: Divides the available bandwidth into time slots, allocating each slot to

different signals.

Resistance to Interference: TDM can be more susceptible to interference as it relies on precise

timing for signal separation.

Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM)

Bandwidth Allocation: By dividing the available bandwidth into frequency bands, it enables the

simultaneous transmission of numerous signals.

Scalability: Greater scalability than TDM since additional signals can be added without

necessarily altering the current frequency allocations.

Resistance to Interference: Because FDM divides signals according to distinct frequency bands,

it is more resilient to interference.

Most Effective Multiplexing Technique for Bandwidth Utilization

Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) would be the best method for maximizing bandwidth

utilization for the company's varied clientele. By splitting the limited bandwidth into frequency
bands, FDM enables the simultaneous transmission of numerous signals. In addition to offering

scalability for future growth and resilience to interference, this would support a wide range of

services, such as high-speed internet access and data-intensive tasks.

In summary, the proposed strategies for the manufacturing plant and office complex include

utilizing Differential Manchester Encoding for reliable data transmission, Fiber-Optic Cable for

backbone connections, and FDM for effective bandwidth usage. These decisions take into

account the particular difficulties presented by the surroundings and the operating requirements

of the business.

References

Dordal, P.L. (2023). Introduction to Computer Networks - Second Edition (2nd

ed.). http://intronetworks.cs.luc.edu/current2/html/index.html