My Project
My Project
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
This work centers on the comparative analysis of the phonetic characteristics of the
standard dialect of Yoruba and Ayede dialect with the view to establishing the
difference in the sounds of the two dialect. By sounds, I mean the tone, consonant,
and vowels of the two dialects.
Ayede is one of the dialects of Yoruba spoken In Oye Local government Area of
Ekiti. It has similar linguistics features with the Yoruba standard dialect. However,
this phonological examination reveals some differences in their phonological
features. Hence, this work examines the phonological differences in the two
dialects i.e the standard dialect of Yoruba and Ayede dialect.
The Yoruba language belongs to the Niger-Congo language family and is part of
the larger Volta-Niger branch. It has a rich oral tradition that predates written
records. The language has evolved over centuries through interactions with
kingdoms and city-states, such as Oyo, Ife, and Ijebu. These political entities
played
a significant role in shaping the Yoruba dialect through their cultural, linguistic,
and administrative influence.In the 19th century, the Yoruba language encountered
European colonial powers, particularly the British, who introduced their own
THE LANGUAGE
The Yoruba culture was originally an oral tradition, and the majority of Yoruba
people are native speakers of the Yoruba language. The number of speakers is
estimated at 30 million in 2010. Yoruba is classified within the Edekiri languages,
and together with the isolate Igala, form the Yoruboid group of languages within
what we now have as West Africa. Igala and Yoruba have important historical and
cultural relationships. The languages of the two ethnic groups bear such a close
resemblance that researchers such as Forde (1951) and Westermann and Bryan
(1952) regarded Igala as a dialect of Yoruba.
Egba, Ibadan, Yewa, and Lagos\Eko are all in North-West Yoruba (NWY)
Yagba, Owe, Ijumu, Gbede, and Abunu belong to North-East Yoruba (NEY)
Igbomina, Ijesha, Ife, Ekiti, and western Akoko are located in the central
Yoruba (CY)
Ketu, Awori, SAkete Ife (TOGO), Idasha and ikpokia\Anogo are South-
Western Yoruba (SWY) terms.
Ikale, Ilaje, Ondo City, “w” Idanre, remo, and ijbu are all in South-East
Yoruba (SEY).
On the other hand, “Aiyede”, which emerged as results of warriors from different
locations is a town in Oye LGA of Ekiti state, South West Nigeria. The town was
said to have been founded by a warrior, General Izimo from Iye-Ekiti and a
mercenary (hired fighter), Atta Esubiyi (Echubiyi- This darkness or invisible
person) from Ibadan Kingdom, a statement by one of the chiefs interviewed.
History has it that some Igalas migrated to Ibadan many years ago, and many of
such people have 3 tribal marks like Kogi Igalas. Esubiyi (Echubiyi) in Igala
means darkness or invisible, as hired fighters can demonstrate different powers,
thus the name.
Furthermore, Attah Esubiyi was said to have derived the name Atta from his war
friend and colleague, Atta Igala (probably of Attah Royal house) from Bida Nupe.
This Bida Igala warrior who fought along with Attah Esubiyi came with his Igala
followers were part of the Ayede Ekiti community first settlers. But whether Attah
Esubiyi was of Igala origin or not, his fighting colleague whom he adopted his
name as well as his followers are Igalas, and their descendants are still members of
Ayede Ekiti town. The title of the traditional ruler of Ayede Ekiti till date is Attah
of Ayede.
At the beginning of the nineteenth century a series of internecine wars destabilized political
arrangements throughout Yorubaland (Nigeria). Aiyede, on the northeastern border of
Ekitiland, was originally a refugee camp. Its inhabitants were immigrants from Iye-Ekiti
who had fled their town because of an invasion in 1830 by the Nupe. Under the leadership
of Esubiyi, a warrior and military leader, Aiyede gradually grew into an empire.
To find the various tonal properties of the dialect and see if they are related
to the standard dialect of Yoruba Language.
To briefly shed light on some other fields of linguistics, and use them to
establish concrete phonological reality of Aiyede dialect.
To see if the sound of the dialect are phonetically recognized or not and to
examine the orthography of Aiyede dialect in comparison with the standard
dialect of Yoruba.
1. What are the phonological similarities and differences between Ayede dialect
and standard dialect of Yoruba?
3. Is the tone system of Aiyede dialect different from the standard dialect of
Yoruba`s?
This research work primarily clarifies the linguistics properties inhibited by the
dialect.
Constant reference to the IPA chart is adopted to justify the various analyses given,
and to concretize the work.
Constantly, prior is given to the tone system of standard dialect of Yoruba to carry
out a proper investigation on the dialect.
Meanwhile, this study is limited to the community of Aiyede Ekiti alone, where the
informant of the various research questions reside. They are indigents of the
community and born and bred in the community, and with marital race. The three
informants, are of the age range 70-80 with high degree of fluency in the dialect.
1.6 Operational definition of terms
Phonology: This is a field of linguistics that studies sound behavior and patterning.
Phonetics: This is another concept of linguistic that is concerned with the primary
properties of speech sounds, including their production, articulation, and physics.
Morphology: This is the field of linguistics that the word formation and the rules
that guide them.
Syntax: This is an aspect of linguistics that studies grammar and its rules
RESEARCH METHODOLY
2.0 INTRODUCTION
In this section, different methods used to collect data in thus are clarified. They
include the method of data collection, the devices used for data analysis and
arrangement.
Mr awosupin Esan
Mr ogunleye Olajide
Mr folorunsho falade
Although, several informant were met,and their names are included but detailed
information were collected from these septuagenarians and octogenarians (70-80).
The Ibadan 400 word list is used in collecting the data out of which a list of 100
selected English words, ranging from Nouns to Verbs were first translated into
Yoruba standard language by researchers and subsequently presented to the
interviewees to get the equivalence in their dialect during the interview. The
interview procedure was recorded in audio format with aid of iPhone device which
was evaluated. However, Generative Theory is used in analyzing and presenting
the data.
2.2 CONCLUSION
This section has attempted the demonstration of the step-by-step approach used in
the collection and analyzing of the data which includes:
Interpretation of collected data and phonological analysis with the help of the
library sources, online sources and consultation of linguistic scholars.
CHAPTER THREE
REVIEWS OF LITERATURE
3.0 INTRODUCTION
There have been numerous studies on phonology and Yoruba standard dialect, but
none on the Aiyede dialect. As a result, the grammatical characteristics of the
Aiyede dialect are investigated, examined, and continually contrasted with the
Yoruba standard dialect.
Phonology is the branch of linguistics concerned with the study of speech sounds
with reference to their distribution and patterning. The adjective for the term is
"phonological." A linguist who specializes in phonology is known as a phonologist.
The word is pronounced "fah-NOL-ah-gee." The term derives from the Greek,
"sound" or "voice."
Observations on Phonology
One way to understand the subject matter of phonology is to contrast it with other
fields within linguistics. A very brief explanation is that phonology is the study of
sound structures in language, which is different from the study
of sentence structures (syntax), word structures (morphology), or
how languages change over time (historical linguistics). But this is insufficient. An
important feature of the structure of a sentence is how it is pronounced, its sound
structure. The pronunciation of a given word is also a fundamental part of the
structure of a word. And certainly the principles of pronunciation in a language are
subject to change over time. So phonology has a relation to numerous domains of
linguistics."
The aim of phonology is to discover the principles that govern the way sounds are
organized in languages and to explain the variations that occur. We begin by
analyzing an individual language to determine which sound units are used and
which patterns they form the language's sound system. We then compare the
properties of different sound systems, and work out hypotheses about the rules
underlying the use of sounds in particular groups of languages. Ultimately,
phonologist want to make statements that apply to all languages....
Whereas phonetics is the study of all possible speech sounds, phonology studies
the way in which a language's speakers systematically use a selection of these
sounds in order to express meaning.
When we talk about the 'sound system' of English, we are referring to the number
of phonemes which are used in a language and to how they are organized."
Phoneme Systems
Phonology is not only about phonemes and allophones. Phonology also concerns
itself with the principles governing the phoneme systems, that is, with what sounds
languages 'like' to have, which sets of sounds are most common (and why) and
which are rare (and also why). It turns out that there are prototype-based
explanations for why the phoneme system of the languages of the world have the
sounds that they do, with physiological/acoustic/perceptual explanations for the
preference for some sounds over others.
The number and depth of these interfaces is so great that one is naturally moved to
ask how autonomous phonetics and phonology are from one another and whether
one can be largely reduced to the other. The answers to these questions in the
current literature could not differ more. At one extreme, Ohala (1990b) argues that
there is in fact no interface between phonetics and phonology because the latter can
largely if not completely be reduced to the former. At the opposite extreme, Hale
& Reiss (2000b) argue for excluding phonetics entirely from phonology because
the latter is about computation, while the former is about something else. Between
these extremes is a large variety of other answers to these questions....
3.1.2.1 Consonant
Consonant refers to a sound created by limiting the breath's flow as it leaves the
mouth to create a distinct sound. Consonants are created in various ways, like
stopping the breath’s flow, obstructing the roof of the mouth, or using the tongue
or lips.
3.1.2.2 Vowels
Vowels, by contrast, are sounds created by freely releasing breath through the
mouth. Vowels are formed when the vocal cords in the throat vibrate without any
obstructions in the mouth. They are grouped into different categories based on the
height of the tongue, their frontness or backness, and the position of lips when
pronounced.
The phonology of Yoruba has been explored by various scholars such as ifode
(1998), Bamgbose, Oyebade (1992) Ikotun and lots more. However, these previous
work are used to analyze tables of consonants and vowels in the subsequent pages.
/b,f,m,t,d,s,l,r,ʤ,ʃ,j,k,g,k͡p,g͡b,w,h/.
Fricative f s ʃ h
Affricative ʤ
Nasal M n
Tap r
Lateral l
Approximant j w
2. Nasals:
• /m/: bilabial nasal; e.g., ọ̀mọ́ [omo] ‘child’,emu[emū] ‘palmwine’
• /n/: alveolar nasal; e.g., nínú[ninu]inside,nà [nã̀] 'beat'
3. Fricatives:
• /f/: voiceless labiodental fricative; e.g., fún[fun] give,filà[fila]’ cap’
• /s/: voiceless alveolar fricative; e.g., “sáré[sare]’run’,sìsí [sisi] 'young
lady'
• /ʃ/: voiceless palato-alveolar fricative; e.g.,ṣé[ʃe] ‘do’, ṣòkòtò [ʃokoto]
'trouser'
• 'scratch'
; e.g., •/h/: voiceless glottal fricative; e.g.,èhin[ehī]’back’,ha [hā]
4. ApproximantS
/j/: palatal approximant; e.g., “jẹ́” [dʒi]’steal’,jà [d͡ʒà] 'fight' /w/: labio-
velar approximant; e.g., wá[wa]’come’,wá [wa]
/l/: alveolar lateral approximant lá [la] ‘spread’,le[le]hard /y/:voiced
palatal approximant
“yí”[ji] ‘this’,
5. Trill
• /r/: alveolar trill; e.g.,rà [ra] 'buy',ri[ri]’see’
VOWELS (FÁWẸ ̀LÌ) 7 In Yorùbá alphabets, there are two types of vowels or
fáwẹ̀ lì:
Nasal Vowels
ọ̀ọ̀nì /alakã̄n/‘crocodile’,ìbọn‘gun
Mid-high e
Mid-low e u
low
High ĩ ũ
Mid-high
Mid-Low ɛ ɔ̃
Low ã
Table 5: The distribution table for the position of occurrence of Yoruba vowels.
/b,f,m,t,d,s,l,r,ʤ,ʃ,j,k,g,k͡p,g͡b,w,h/.
Researcher
High i u
Mid-high e o
Mid-low ɛ ɔ̃
low a
Mid-high
Mid-Low ɛ ɔ̃
Low ã
Table 10: The distribution table for the occurrence of Aiyede vowels.
The theoretical approach of this study is generative phonology theory. It allows the
comparison and contrasting of certain phonological inputs and showcase their
underlying and surface phonological forms in the standard dialect of Yoruba and
Aiyede dialect.
GP and the Sound Pattern of English (SPE) Ogunsiji and Sunday (2011" 163) argue
that the SPE is the major contribution of Chomsky and Halle to phonology; it is an
attempt to build a description of English phonology on a transformational
generative theory of language. In it, Chomsky and Halle attempt to state explicitly
the phonological rules underlying the speech sounds of native English speakers.
Thus, it is regarded as the defining text of GP which has established its standard
framework that reads as follows: "There are abstract rules determining the actual
acoustic output of speech; the rules apply sequentially to produce a series of
derivations resulting in an abstract representation of the phonetic representation;
phonetics consists of a series of segments that could be exhaustively defined in
terms of sets of binary features; the rules are strictly ordered" (Chomsky and Halle,
1968: 78) (cited in Ogunsiji and Sunday, 2011: 163). Accordingly, phonological
representations are considered as "sequences of segments made up of distinctive
features. Goldsmith and Laks (2012: 1-2) state that the use of rules and features as
the elements of phonological description in GP means that the concept of phoneme
is under threat. They (ibid.) contend that for generative phonologists, the phoneme
is a hindrance to description; yet, this does not mean that Chomsky and Halle
totally ignore the concept of phoneme; rather, they regard each phoneme as a
bundle of distinctive features and incorporate Jacobson's (1942) distinctive features
into their theory which regard the use of distinctive features as the centre of
phonological descriptions. Thus, the hallmark of GP is feature analysis. Hence,
each phoneme, according to this phonological model, is seen as being made up of a
bundle of features rather than an irreducible contrastive unit of sound (ibid.). For
example, back rounded vowels include the following distinctive features: -
Consonantal +back +round +syllabic
3.2.3 COMPONENT OF GP
The following are the essential components of GP: 1.3.1. Phonological Rules
Goldsmith (1993: 66) defines phonological rules as "mapping between two
different levels of sound representation: (1) the abstract underlying level and (2)
the surface level" to portray how speakers go from the abstract representations
stored in their mind to the actual sounds they articulate when they speak. One of
the key concepts in Generative Phonology is the notion of phonological rules,
which specify how abstract units of sound (phonemes) are transformed into surface
sounds (allophones) in different contexts. For example, different phonological rules
apply in English to produce the distinct pronunciations of the past tense morpheme
'-ed' in words such as "baked", "hoped", and "hissed". Similarly, different
phonological rules apply in Yoruba to differentiate between the different tones of
words.
a. Assimilation rules: These are rules via which a sound may alter one of its
features to become more similar to a neighbouring sound (Web resource 1). This
type of rule occurs in the English plural rule where the plural suffix becomes
voiced or voiceless depending on whether the preceding consonant is voiced or
voiceless (ibid.).
b. Deletion rules: These are rules through which a sound such as an unstressed
syllable or a weak consonant may not be pronounced, e.g., most American English
speakers do not pronounce [d] in (hand back) (ibid.).
SUMMARY
This chapter was able to define the concept of phonology, establish the various
sounds patterning of the standard dialect of Yoruba and Aiyede dialect with
regards to various phonetic charts of the vowels and consonants of the two dialects.
The linguistics items adopted from Ibadan 400 word list are adequately described
phonetically as to solidify the aim of the study. It ended with the theoretical
framework of Noam Chomsky`s Generative Theory in order to generate the
outputs of word from their inputs and compare and contrast the sounds pattern of
Yoruba with that of Aiyede dialect.
CHAPTER FOUR
This chapter provides the equivalence of the words in the standard yoruba in the
dialect of Aiyede. The gives adequate tonal difference and similarities between the
two dialects.
These comparisons range from the close class lexical categories open class forms.
A list of 100 words have been randomly selected from 400 ibadan items,enriched
with adequate word classes and subsequently translated to Yoruba and Aiyede
dialects respectively. Nonetheless, the aim of the data is to present the relativeness
of Aiyede dialect with standard Yoruba and also discover various sound changes
that occur in their lexicons.
CONCRETE NOUNS
VERBS
PHRASAL VERB
ADJECTIVES OF NUMBER
PLACE NOUNS
DEMONSTRATIVE ADJECTIVE
ADVERBS
INTERROGATIVE PRONOUNS
PREPOSITIONS
ENGLISH. YORUBA. AYEDE DIALECT
94. From. láti. lati
95 in. Ní. Ninu
96. Away. Lọ. Lọ
VERBS
There are certain phonological processes in the standard dialect of Yoruba and the
Aiyede dialect. These processes are the basic phonological rules that guide the
sound of a particular language. The standard Yoruba dialect has various
phonological processes.
Smith (1995) defines phonological rules as mapping two different levels of sound
representation in this case, the abstract or underlying level and the surface level.
Let`s make this evident by carefully discussing them, with the items randomly
from Ibadan list of 400 items.
Deletion
Epenthesis
Epenthesis involves the insertion of an extra sound, typically a vowel, into a word.
In Yoruba, an example would be in the word
Phonemic Analysis
This involves identifying and distinguishing between phonemes (distinct speech
sounds) in a language. For example, Yoruba has distinct phonemes like [b], [d],
and [k]. Phonemic analysis helps identify minimal pairs where the change of a
single phoneme can result in a different word with a different meaning.
Standard Yoruba. Ayede dialect
Pa (kill) ta(shoot)
Rí (ṣee). wí(speak)
Odó (river). Òde (room)
Free variation
In language, free variation refers to cases where multiple pronunciations or sound
variations can be used interchangeably without affecting the meaning. An example
in Yoruba is the pronunciation of the word "agbo" [agbo] meaning "medicine" with
or without the nasalized vowel sound [ŋ], resulting in [agbo] or [aŋbo ]
Standard yoruba Ayede dialect. Gloss
Ìdodo. Udodo. Navel
Ẹsẹ. Osè. Leg
Iṣu. Usu. Yam
Igbá. Ugbá Time
Allophones
allophones are different phonetic realizations of the same phoneme. For instance,
the Yoruba phoneme /b/ can be realized as a voiced bilabial stop [b] or as an
unreleased sound [m̥] when it occurs between two nasal sounds, as in the word
"inba" [ĩːba] meaning "spear."