HEARING DATE:
PROPONENT:
PROGRAM: Bachelor of Science in Architecture
THESIS TITLE:
PANELIST:
PROPOSAL PRESENTATION GRADING RUBRIC
This rubric is designed to evaluate the Title Hearing Presentation, focusing on understanding, relevance, presentation skills, visual aids, and response to questions. Each criterion is scored on a
scale from Excellent to Poor.
WEIGH
CATEGORY CRITERIA EXCELLENT (5) VERY GOOD (4) GOOD (3) FAIR (2) POOR (1) GRADE EQUIVALENT
T
A. CONTENT Introduction and Purpose and relevance Purpose and relevance Purpose and relevance Weak explanation of Purpose and
AND Objectives of the study are are clear and well- are adequately purpose and relevance are unclear
DELIVERY (15%) exceptionally clear, well- explained, with minor explained but lack depth relevance; objectives or missing; objectives
explained, and highly gaps in engagement or or compelling delivery. unclear or weakly are poorly stated or
engaging. clarity. aligned. irrelevant.
Key Findings Methodology, findings, Findings are logically Findings are adequately Findings are weakly Findings and analysis
(15%) and implications are presented and presented but lack aligned with the are disorganized,
logically and effectively relevant, with minor depth, logical flow, or research objectives; unclear, or irrelevant
presented, gaps in depth or clarity. analysis lacks to the research
demonstrating deep clarity. coherence. objectives.
50% understanding.
Conclusion and Conclusions are strong, Conclusions are clear Conclusions are Conclusions are Conclusions are
Impact (10%) concise, and clearly and aligned with somewhat clear but lack weakly aligned with unclear, misaligned, or
articulate the study’s objectives but lack depth, alignment, or objectives; impact is irrelevant; impact is
significance and lasting strong emphasis or emphasis. unclear or minimally poorly articulated.
impact. impact. addressed.
Delivery (10%) Presenter is highly Presenter is confident Delivery is adequate but Presenter Presenter is unclear,
confident, clear, and and clear, with minor lacks confidence, clarity, demonstrates weak disengaged, or poorly
engaging; demonstrates lapses in engagement or strong audience delivery skills or lacks conveys information.
mastery of subject or clarity. engagement. confidence and
matter. engagement.
B. VISUAL AIDS Quality and Slides are professional, Slides are clear and Slides are adequate but Slides are poorly Slides are
AND DESIGN Clarity of Slides well-designed, and professional, with lack clarity, designed or unclear, unprofessional,
(10%) effectively convey the minor design flaws or professionalism, or with distracting unclear, or fail to
study’s content with no distracting elements. effective design. elements that hinder convey the content
distractions. understanding. effectively.
20%
Effective Use of Diagrams, graphs, and Visuals are clear and Visuals are adequate Visuals are minimally Visuals are irrelevant,
Visuals (10%) visuals are seamlessly relevant but could be but lack relevance, relevant or poorly unclear, or absent; fail
integrated, highly more effectively clarity, or effective integrated into the to support the
relevant, and enhance integrated or impactful. integration. presentation. presentation.
clarity.
C. Q&A AND Ability to 20% Questions are addressed Questions are Responses are Responses are Questions are poorly
Rueda Street, Calbayog City, Samar, Philippines 6710 [email protected] 063 055 5339857 www.nwssu.edu.ph
INTERACTION Address clearly and confidently, addressed clearly, with adequate but lack depth, unclear, lack addressed, unclear, or
Questions (10%) demonstrating thorough minor lapses in confidence, or clarity. confidence, or avoided; demonstrate
preparation and confidence or depth. demonstrate weak lack of preparation.
understanding. preparation.
Understanding Presenter demonstrates Presenter Presenter demonstrates Presenter Presenter fails to
of Subject (10%) deep knowledge and demonstrates solid adequate understanding demonstrates limited demonstrate
critical understanding of understanding, with but struggles with understanding, with understanding of the
the subject matter. minor gaps in critical complex or in-depth noticeable gaps in subject matter.
knowledge. concepts. subject knowledge.
D. TIMING AND Adherence to Presentation adheres Presentation slightly Presentation noticeably Presentation Presentation does not
ORGANIZATION Time (5%) perfectly to the allotted exceeds or falls short exceeds or falls short of significantly exceeds adhere to time; key
time; all key points are of the time limit but time, affecting coverage or falls short of time, points are poorly or
covered thoroughly. remains effective. of key points. compromising quality inadequately covered.
and coverage.
10%
Logical Presentation flows Presentation flows Presentation is Presentation is Presentation is
Sequence and logically with smooth logically but with minor somewhat logical but disorganized, with illogical, poorly
Pacing (5%) transitions and well- issues in transitions or contains noticeable weak transitions and organized, and difficult
paced delivery. pacing. disconnections or poor pacing. to follow; pacing is
uneven pacing. inadequate.
TOTAL SCORE:
Evaluation Process:
1. Assess the student's depth of knowledge and understanding of the topics presented, including clarity in explaining the research problem and proposed solutions.
2. Evaluate the relevance of the research topic to current architectural challenges and its potential impact on the field.
3. Review the effectiveness of the presentation delivery, including clarity, engagement with the audience, and professional demeanor.
4. Assess the quality and effectiveness of visual aids used to support the presentation.
5. Evaluate the student’s ability to respond to questions, demonstrating critical thinking and depth of knowledge.
Comments and Suggestions:
Approved for STEP 2 (Thesis Proposal) ___ Yes ___ No
Panel Signature
Rueda Street, Calbayog City, Samar, Philippines 6710 [email protected] 063 055 5339857 www.nwssu.edu.ph
____________________________
Rueda Street, Calbayog City, Samar, Philippines 6710 [email protected] 063 055 5339857 www.nwssu.edu.ph
