Module 2
Module 2
MODULE 2
What Was The February
Revolution?1917
Who: The people of Russia later joined by troops from the Russian
Army and Imperial Guard vs Tsar Nicholas II, Imperial Government
Gendarmes and Ministry of Internal Affairs Department (MVD) of Police.
What: Protests and marches that escalated into riots, mutiny and
violence.
Where: Petrograd (St Petersburg) Russia’s second largest city.
When: 22 February – 3 March Julian calendar (8 – 16 March 1917
Gregorian calendar – adopted by Russia in 1918).
Part of: Took place during the First World War.
Result: Abdication of the Tsar and the end of nearly 500 years of
autocratic rule in Russia. Provisional Government established and
reforms introduced. Russia continues to fight in the First World War.
The February Revolution was the first of two revolutions that took place in
Russia in 1917.
At the time of the revolution Russia was an autocracy, with Tsar Nicholas
II holding absolute power over his people. Its political, social and economic
structures were extremely backward in comparison to other countries in
Europe. Food shortages and military failures at the start of the twentieth
century had caused strikes and riots that were often brutally
suppressed. The 1905 Revolution had led to some reforms, including the
establishment of a State Duma (legislative assembly), but there was still no
real democracy in Russia.
Russia's entry into the First World War was initially supported by most
Russians. However its infrastructure struggled to cope with the demands of
war. Russia's industry depended almost entirely on foreign imports.
When Germany and its Turkish allies blockaded Russia's Eastern ports,
its railway, electricity and supply systems broke down. There were not
enough laborers to collect the harvests and there were serious food
shortages.
The war was going badly for Russia with a string of defeats. In 1915, the Tsar
attempted to boost moral by taking personal command of the army. This
move had disastrous results. The Tsar was a poor military leader and he was
now blamed for every defeat. He had also left his wife, the German-
born Tsarina Alexandra, in charge at home. The Tsarina was very
unpopular and seemed to be under the control of the equally unpopular
mystic Grigori Rasputin.
JOHN SIBANDA 1
2
PHOTOGRAPHS
General Khahalov, to suppress the rioting by force. But troops in the city
refused. They mutinied and joined the protesters. Having lost the support of
the army and under the advice of his army chiefs and ministers, the Tsar
abdicated for himself and his son on 2 March 1917. His brother refused to
succeed the throne, marking the end of the Tsarist regime.
PHOTOGRAPHS
JOHN SIBANDA 3
2
Political problems
Political problems
The incompetence of Nicholas II
Tsar Nicholas II was unable to rule effectively. He made poor decisions that
led to worsening relations with the government and increased hardship for
civilians and soldiers alike.
Nicholas refused to accept any reduction in the absolute power he held.
He was detached from the plight of the Russian people and his policies also
alienated ethnic minorities.
When the Duma was recalled during World War 1, a group of Octoberists and
Kadets established the Progressive Bloc. This group wanted to have more
control over the war. In response, in 1915, Nicholas closed the Duma. This
alienated many liberals.
Nicholas declared himself Commander in Chief of the army and departed for
the Eastern Front to take control of operations.
However, Nicholas was not well educated in the tactics of war. Moreover, his
absence left a weakened government in Petrograd (formerly St Petersburg).
The war and the Tsarina
JOHN SIBANDA 4
2
Figure caption,
Tsarina Alexandra and her son, Tsarevich Alexei
As the war continued, the quality and effectiveness of the Russian Empire's
government was called into question.
The departure of Nicholas II to the front left his wife, Tsarina Alexandra, in
control. Alexandra was not hugely popular in Russia. She was reserved and
awkward in public. More importantly, she was a German princess and some
were suspicious as to where here loyalties lay in the war.
Alexandra gained increasing influence over the appointment of ministers to
the government. She was determined that no member of the imperial
government should ever be in a sufficiently strong position to challenge the
authority of her beloved husband. She appointed less threatening,
sometimes incompetent, ministers to replace those who knew how to
govern.
As a result, members of the government tended to be increasingly weak and
ineffective men. They owed their positions to winning favour with the
Tsarina, rather than their ability and effectiveness.
This would have been bad enough with Russia at peace, but in wartime, it led
inevitably to disaster for the monarchy and for Russia.
Issues with Rasputin
JOHN SIBANDA 5
2
Figure caption,
Rasputin
The imperial family was brought into disrepute as the Tsarina fell under the
influence of Grigori Rasputin.
Rasputin was a monk from Siberia. He was rumoured to be a Khlyst, member
of an extreme underground sect that had split from the Orthodox Church. He
was infamous for his drunkenness and for womanising.
However he also gained a reputation as a healer, able to perform amazing
feats and miracles.
Rasputin came to the attention of the royal family. In April 1907, Alexandra
called on him to heal her only son, the Tsarevich Alexei. He was suffering
from painful bleeding as a result of an injury. It was not publicly known but
Alexis suffered from the blood disease haemophilia.
After Alexei recovered, Tsarina Alexandra became convinced that Rasputin
could control the young boy's illness.
While there is still debate over the nature of his powers over the health of
Alexei, it is clear that his influence over the Tsarina was considerable. He
advised her on appointments to the government, interfered in important
decisions. He could do no wrong in the eyes of the Tsarina. Excuses were
always made for his excessive and antisocial behaviour.
To the Russian people, Rasputin symbolised everything that was wrong with
imperial government. The court and the royal family became objects of
JOHN SIBANDA 6
2
Despite the Bolsheviks holding influence over many workers, Lenin had no
part in bringing about the February Revolution. He believed that revolution
should be organised, not developed from unorganised protest.
Impact of World War One
The War brought terrible suffering for soldiers and civilians alike. Best
estimates state that almost two million Russian soldiers were killed. A similar
number of civilians also perished. Morale during this time was very low and
the myth of the army as the Russian ‘steamroller’ had been vanquished.
The Russian people looked for someone to hold to account for their suffering.
In 1915, the Tsar had declared himself Commander in Chief of the Army. This
made him a suitable target for this discontent.
Military defeats
World War One was a total disaster for Russia. The Russian army suffered
defeat after defeat at the hands of Germany.
1914
Figure caption,
German troops pose with Russian guns captured at the Masurian Lakes
The Russians invaded Eastern Germany with two large armies. They were
completely routed by smaller German forces at the battles of Tannenberg
and the Masurian Lakes.
1915
Germany turned the full weight of its power against Russia and launched a
series of onslaughts, including the Gorlice-Tarnow Offensive and the 2nd
Battle of the Masurian Lakes.
JOHN SIBANDA 7
2
The Germans and Austrians unified their command and were able to
successively rout Russian forces, who lacked modern weaponry or enough
supplies. The Russians were forced into retreat. Large areas of Russian
territory including Lithuania and Poland, were overrun.
1916
For a time, the Russians achieved victory against the Germans and Austrians
and regained some territory. However, the gains were minimal and Russia
suffered heavy defeats late in the year.
Leadership
Image caption,
Nicholas II blesses Russian troops
In 1915, Tsar Nicholas II took personal command of the army. He left St
Petersburg and moved to army headquarters in Russian Poland.
Nicholas II may have believed that, by taking charge, his army would be
inspired and would fight with renewed vigour. Unfortunately, the Tsar knew
little about the command and organisation of large military forces. The series
of defeats and humiliations continued.
The organisation of the Russian army deteriorated and there were massive
shortages of ammunition, equipment, and medical supplies.
Nicholas II's decision to take charge meant that he was increasingly seen by
the Russian people as having personal responsibility for the military disasters
inflicted on Russia.
Economic problems
From the start of the war, Russia's economic problems grew steadily worse.
By the beginning of 1917, the country was facing virtual economic collapse.
Industry
Russian industry moved into crisis during the war. Vital raw materials from
overseas could no longer reach Russia. This resulted in shortages of raw
JOHN SIBANDA 8
2
materials and finished goods. The army faced major shortages of supplies
and weapons.
Transport
Russia had an underdeveloped railway system. This was taken over by the
government to be used primarily for the war effort. It had to cope with the
pressures of moving large quantities of troops and supplies to the
battlefronts. This made it more difficult to keep the cities supplied with food.
Agriculture
Agricultural methods remained backward and still relied on many peasants
being able to work the land. Millions of peasant farmers were conscripted
into the army. This led to a major shortage of manpower on the farms and a
corresponding fall in production.
There were serious shortages of food in the city shops. The price of even the
most basic foods was rising steeply.
By 1916, inflation had reached 200 per cent, the value of the rouble had
fallen substantially and the price of goods was soaring. This made life
increasingly difficult, particularly for poorer people.
Revolution from below
Discontent among peasants
Many of those conscription into the army had come from the Russian
peasantry. By 1916 a third had been injured.
As the Russian Army had retreated from Poland and Lithuania in 1915, they
had employed a ‘scorched earth’ policy, destroying a great deal of farmland.
Peasant livelihoods were obliterated.
Shortages in grain during the war resulted in many of the poorer land
workers hoarding what they produced.
Discontent among workers
Figure caption,
JOHN SIBANDA 9
2
the railways were committed to the war effort not transporting supplies
to the cities
There was a severe lack of food in Moscow and, in 1917, Petrograd only
received half of the grain required to feed its citizens. These shortages
contributed to social unrest.
In January 1917, in commemoration of Bloody Sunday, 140 000 workers went
on strike in Petrograd. In February, rioting broke out in the city. Crowds
attacked bakeries in a desperate search for bread. This was partially in
response to the announcement of bread rationing.
In the following days, strikes and demonstrations took place. Strikers from
the Putilov Engineering Plantith joined the crowds at the celebration of
International Women’s Day. As the number of people on the streets of
Petrograd increased, soldiers refused orders to fire on the crowds. Instead
they began to join in the protests.
The Petrograd Soviet was established and issued Order #1, announcing that
soldiers had the right to elect their own officers.
The fall of the Tsar
When informed of these events, Nicholas II dismissed it as a "hooligan
movement" which would soon be over. Even as his regime met total
collapse, the Tsar still showed his inability to face reality.
Nicholas made an attempt to return from the war front to the capital,
Petrograd, and reclaim his authority. But in late February revolutionaries
diverted the train to Pskov. Isolated and powerless without the support of the
army, his reign as Tsar was over - the only option now was abdication.
Nicholas named his brother, the Grand Duke Michael, as his successor.
Michael lacked the support of the people or the military. He refused the
position. With that, the Romanov dynasty surrendered control of Russia.
JOHN SIBANDA 10
2
Fig. 1 - The 1903 Second Congress of the RSDWP saw the presence of
Vladimir Lenin and Georgy Plekhanov (top row, second and third from left)
In 1903, the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks were born after
disagreements at the RSDWP Second Congress, but they did not
formally split the party. The official split in the RSDWP came after
the October Revolution in 1917, when Lenin led the Bolsheviks to
control Russia. He formed a coalition soviet government with
the Left Socialist Revolutionaries, refusing cooperation with other
parties. Once the coalition ended in March 1918 after disagreements
over the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, the Bolsheviks transformed into
the Russian Communist Party.
Did you know? The Russian Social Democratic Workers' Party was
known by a few names. You might also see RSDLP (Russian Social
JOHN SIBANDA 11
2
Bolshevik Definition
Let's first look at what 'Bolshevik' actually means.
Bolshevik
1917 Event
JOHN SIBANDA 12
2
Lenin
Lenin had been the leader of the Bolshevik Party since the RSDWP
started fracturing in 1903. He developed the ideology of Marxism-
Leninism that he hoped would be a practical application of Marxist
theory in Russia. However, due to his high profile as a revolutionary,
he was rarely physically present in Russia, and so organised the
Bolshevik party from abroad in Western Europe.
Lenin was arrested and exiled to Siberia in 1895 for creating the
Social Democratic organisation the St Petersburg Union of
Struggle for the Liberation of the Working Class. This meant he
had to send a delegate to the First Congress of the RSDWP in 1898.
He returned to Pskov, Russia in 1900 as he was banned from St
Petersburg, and created the Iskra, an RSDWP newspaper,
with Georgy Plekhanov and Julius Martov.
JOHN SIBANDA 14
2
Trotsky
Trotsky played an integral role in the Bolshevik Revolution; however,
he was only a recent convert to the Bolshevik cause. After the 1903
Second Congress of the RSDWP, Trotsky supported
the Mensheviks against Lenin.
JOHN SIBANDA 15
2
Trotsky stated that once the working class began to seek democratic
rights, they would not settle for a bourgeois government and would
continue to revolt until socialism was established. This would then
spread to other countries.
Trotsky led the Red Guard to support the Bolsheviks' rise to power
during the Revolution. There was little resistance when the Red
Guard arrived at the Winter Palace to depose the PG, but there
followed a series of uprisings against the Soviet Government.
JOHN SIBANDA 16
2
Long-term causes
There were three main long-term causes for the Bolshevik Revolution:
the Tsarist autocracy, the failed Dumas, and Imperial Russia's
involvement in warfare.
The Tsar
The Tsarist regime was by far the most deep-rooted cause of the
Bolshevik Revolution. Socialism began to gain popularity throughout
the 19th century and was exacerbated by the arrival of the more
radical Marxist groups who opposed Tsarism. Once Lenin had
established Marxism-Leninism as a strategy to overthrow the Tsar and
establish socialism, the Bolshevik cause grew in popularity, climaxing
in the 1917 Revolution.
The Duma
After the 1905 Russian Revolution, Tsar Nicholas II allowed the
creation of the Duma, the
JOHN SIBANDA 17
2
Constitutional Monarchy
A system of government whereby the monarch (in this case the Tsar)
remains the head of state but their powers are limited by a
constitution and they share control of the state with a government.
Warfare
After Tsar Nicholas II took power, he had plans for imperialist
expansion. He provoked the unpopular Russo-Japanese
War in 1904 which led to Russia's embarrassing defeat and the 1905
Russian Revolution. When the Tsar engaged Russia in the First World
War, he gained more unpopularity as Russia's Imperial Army suffered
the heaviest losses of any other belligerent country.
JOHN SIBANDA 18
2
Short-term causes
The short-term causes began with the February Revolution in 1917
and can be summarised by the Provisional Government's poor
leadership. Initially, they had the Petrograd Soviet's support. As the
Petrograd Soviet consisted of Mensheviks and SRs, they believed
that the bourgeois PG was necessary to
develop industrialisation and capitalism before a second
revolution could instate socialism. Let's look at how the Provisional
Government dealt with the challenges of 1917, leading to further
revolution.
JOHN SIBANDA 19
2
The PG could not control the July Days protests, and the Petrograd
Soviet refused to heed the protesters' demands and take sole control
of Russia. Although the Bolsheviks reluctantly began to support the
protesters with a peaceful demonstration, they were not
prepared to stage a revolution. Without the strategic means of the
Bolsheviks or the political backing of the Soviet, the protest
eventually de-escalated in a matter of days.
Kornilov Revolt
General Kornilov was a loyal Tsarist general of the Russian Army
and began marching on Petrograd in August 1917. He defected
against Prime Minister Kerensky and appeared to be preparing
a coup d'état against the PG. Kerensky asked the Soviet to defend
the PG, arming the Red Guard. It was a major embarrassment for
the PG and showed their ineffective leadership.
JOHN SIBANDA 20
2
JOHN SIBANDA 21
2
Following the Russian Civil War, Lenin issued his 1921 Decree
Against Factionalism, which prohibited defection from the
Bolshevik party line – this outlawed all political opposition and placed
the Bolsheviks, now the Russian Communist Party, as the sole
leaders of Russia.
JOHN SIBANDA 22
2
References
1. Ian D. Thatcher, 'The First Histories of the Russian Social-
Democratic Labour Party, 1904-06', The Slavonic and East
European Review, 2007.
2. 'Bolshevik Revolution: 1917', The Westport Library, 2022.
3. Hannah Dalton, 'Tsarist and Communist Russia, 1855-1964',
2015.
10.
11. Figure caption,
12. German troops pose with Russian guns captured at the Masurian
Lakes
JOHN SIBANDA 23
2
13. The Russians invaded Eastern Germany with two large armies.
They were completely routed by smaller German forces at the battles
of Tannenberg and the Masurian Lakes.
14. 1915
15. Germany turned the full weight of its power against Russia and
launched a series of onslaughts, including the Gorlice-Tarnow Offensive
and the 2nd Battle of the Masurian Lakes.
16. The Germans and Austrians unified their command and were
able to successively rout Russian forces, who lacked modern weaponry
or enough supplies. The Russians were forced into retreat. Large areas
of Russian territory including Lithuania and Poland, were overrun.
17. 1916
18. For a time, the Russians achieved victory against the Germans
and Austrians and regained some territory. However, the gains were
minimal and Russia suffered heavy defeats late in the year.
19. Leadership
20.
21. Image caption,
22. Nicholas II blesses Russian troops
23. In 1915, Tsar Nicholas II took personal command of the army. He
left St Petersburg and moved to army headquarters in Russian Poland.
24. Nicholas II may have believed that, by taking charge, his army
would be inspired and would fight with renewed vigour. Unfortunately,
the Tsar knew little about the command and organisation of large
military forces. The series of defeats and humiliations continued.
25. The organisation of the Russian army deteriorated and there
were massive shortages of ammunition, equipment, and medical
supplies.
JOHN SIBANDA 24
2
Nicholas II, the last Tsar of Russia, inherited a complex and fragile
empire. He was a deeply religious man, but lacked the political skills
and decisiveness his predecessors possessed. He often relied on
advisors and struggled to make bold decisions.
In the early 20th century, Russia faced internal turmoil: economic
inequality, growing discontent among workers and peasants, and a
JOHN SIBANDA 25
2
3. A Nation in Crisis:
JOHN SIBANDA 26
2
The disastrous war effort, coupled with the Tsar's inept leadership
and the growing influence of the Bolsheviks, sparked the February
Revolution in 1917.
The Tsar abdicated, ending the Romanov dynasty and the centuries-
old autocratic system of Russia.
The revolution led to the establishment of a provisional government,
which initially attempted to continue the war effort. However, the
Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, promised an end to the war, land for the
peasants, and "peace, bread, and land."
Their promise resonated with the weary and war-torn population,
ultimately leading to the Bolshevik Revolution in October 1917.
Key Takeaways:
JOHN SIBANDA 27
2
whereby he had far too much influence over her decisions. Evidently
this had the effect of casting doubt over Nicholas' intentions and as
Russia suffered great losses of life and land on the Eastern front
dissent grew. The continued war saw valuable resources sent to the
front such as food and drink. Leaving an already starving population
in even more desperate need. The Marxist ideas of communism
gained even greater support during these times of unrest, the
promise of all men recieving the same made for a better life than
some earning nothing and others earning all. Marxist
supporters promised reforms that would create a better life for the
peasants. As a consequence of the war, there was a massive
shortage in manpower, industry declined and inflation rose rapidly.
This all culminated in a general strike in February 1917, one that the
Tsar percieved as just a hooligan movement that would pass.
This notion highlights the serious underappreciation of Nicholas
to the severity of the problem and the hopeless situation his people
found themselves in. After his own soldiers began to join the strike,
refusing Nicholas' orders to quell the people by force, and his
desperate attempt to return to the capital was halted, abdication
was his only option left.
A
photograph of Provisional Government ministers (seated) in 1917.
The Provisional Government inherited political authority after the
abdication of Nicholas II. It enjoyed a brief honeymoon period
marked by hope, optimism and public support. But the Provisional
Government was soon confronted by the same policy issues that
JOHN SIBANDA 29
2
JOHN SIBANDA 30
2
secret ballot, which will determine the form of government and the
constitution of the country.
As its name suggests, the Provisional Government was only a
transitional regime, formed to oversee Russia’s transformation from
tsarism to a democratically elected Constituent Assembly. Most
expected elections for this Constituent Assembly to be organised
within six months, certainly well before the end of 1917. In the
meantime, the Provisional Government attempted to rule as one
might expect an elected government to rule. But this itself was
problematic, for several reasons.
Though its members were drawn from the Duma, the Provisional
Government had no mandate; it had not been selected or endorsed
by the people. Russians were aware that it was a temporary
government, so its laws and decrees were not always respected or
taken seriously. As the year progressed, the Provisional Government
found it more and more difficult to see its policies through to
completion. By the summer the government was largely impotent
and its most of its directives were carried out partially or half-
heartedly, if at all. One contemporary observer dubbed it the
“Persuasive Government”, since it had to cajole or convince to get
things done.
JOHN SIBANDA 31
2
JOHN SIBANDA 32
2
should not interfere in the status quo. The consensus, therefore, was
to maintain Russia’s commitment on the Eastern Front.
commanders and gave rousing speeches – but these ploys had little
effect. The Russian army was fatigued by three years of war, still
poorly led and under-resourced and pushed to the brink of mutiny
by anti-war propaganda. The July Offensive in Galicia was a costly
defeat, resulting in 400,000 casualties. Kerensky’s only response
was to sack his commander-in-chief, Brusilov, and replace him with
General Lavr Kornilov – a move that would soon have consequences
for Kerensky’s government.
5. The most pressing concern for the Provisional Government was its
decision to maintain the war effort. This made the government
extremely unpopular, particularly in April (forcing the resignation of
Milyukov) and again in July (after Kerensky’s failed offensive in
Galicia).
JOHN SIBANDA 35