Men Salaries Women Salaries
1 ₱ 55,000.00 ₱ 53,000.00
2 ₱ 60,000.00 ₱ 65,000.00
3 ₱ 58,000.00 ₱ 59,000.00
4 ₱ 62,000.00 ₱ 61,000.00
5 ₱ 63,000.00 ₱ 55,000.00
6 ₱ 57,000.00 ₱ 63,000.00
7 ₱ 61,000.00 ₱ 58,000.00
8 ₱ 59,000.00 ₱ 64,000.00
9 ₱ 64,000.00 ₱ 60,000.00
10 ₱ 56,000.00 ₱ 62,000.00
11 ₱ 50,000.00 ₱ 48,000.00
12 ₱ 52,000.00 ₱ 57,000.00
13 ₱ 51,000.00 ₱ 53,000.00
14 ₱ 55,000.00 ₱ 55,000.00
15 ₱ 53,000.00 ₱ 51,000.00
16 ₱ 49,000.00 ₱ 58,000.00
17 ₱ 54,000.00 ₱ 52,000.00
18 ₱ 50,000.00 ₱ 59,000.00
2 19 ₱ 56,000.00 ₱ 55,000.00
20 ₱ 52,000.00 ₱ 56,000.00
SUM N = 20 ₱ 1,117,000.00 ₱ 1,144,000.00
MEAN ₱ 55,850.00 ₱ 57,200.00
MEDIAN ₱ 55,500.00 ₱ 57,500.00
MODE ₱ 55,000.00 ₱ 55,000.00
STANDARD DEVIATION ₱ 4,568.48 ₱ 4,560.70
T-TEST
1
Null Hypothesis (H₀): There is no significant difference in the average salaries between male and female employee
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): There is a significant difference in the average salaries between male and female employees
3-a A common significance level used is 0.05 (5%). For a two-tailed test, we split this between both tails of the
distribution (so 0.025 in each tail). The critical t-value is the value of the t-statistic that corresponds to the
points for the tails of the distribution. If the computed t-statistic falls beyond this value (either in the left o
we reject the null hypothesis.
In this case, the computed t-test statistic was 0.356, which is far less than 2.024, meaning it lies within the
where we would not reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we conclude that there's no significan
difference in the average salaries between men and women in the sample.
3-b Based on the t-test analysis, the computed t-test statistic of 0.356 is significantly smaller than the critical t-
2.024 for a 5% significance level. This indicates that the difference in mean salaries between male and fem
employees is not statistically significant. In other words, there is insufficient evidence for us to reject the n
hypothesis, which holds that there is no significant difference in the average salaries between male and fem
employees.
The observed salary difference between the two groups (mean salary of P55,850 for men and P57,200 for
could be due to random variation rather than a true difference. For example, imagine that the company em
few more employees in a given year, and their salaries were set slightly higher due to increased market rat
could lead to a temporary difference in average salaries between men and women if, by chance, more of t
hired employees are of one gender. However, this difference does not necessarily represent a systemic pay
rather a short-term fluctuation.
Therefore, based on the data supplied, we can conclude that the company's pay practices
to be equitable with respect to gender.
A company is dedicated to pay
fairness and seeks to examine if
there's a statistically significant pay
gap between male and female
employees. To do this, it gathered the
salary data for 20 employees from
each gender.
Find:
1. Null and Alternative Hypothesis
2. Computation through use of
Data Analysis
3. Interpretation
a. Based on computed table
b. Own interpretation (based on
computation + hypothesis)
0.3555609868821 or .356 (if rounded)
s between male and female employees.
between male and female employees.
e split this between both tails of the
e t-statistic that corresponds to the cutoff
eyond this value (either in the left or right tail),
an 2.024, meaning it lies within the range
ude that there's no significant
n in the sample.
nificantly smaller than the critical t-value of
ean salaries between male and female
cient evidence for us to reject the null
erage salaries between male and female
f P55,850 for men and P57,200 for women)
mple, imagine that the company employed a
higher due to increased market rates. This
and women if, by chance, more of the newly
necessarily represent a systemic pay gap but
t the company's pay practices appear