Confidential Psychological Report
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Purpose: Psychological Clearance for Firearm License
Test Administered
• Rorschach Inkblot Test – Exner’s Comprehensive System (Exner, 2003)
• Clinical Interview
• Mental Status Examination
Behavioral Observations
The client was attentive, cooperative, and demonstrated average to above-average verbal
articulation. Task engagement was appropriate. No signs of distress, hesitation, or
disorganized thought were observed.
Rorschach Test Data Summary
Total Responses (R) = 23 (Adequate protocol length; within interpretive range)
Location (L):
• W: 8
• D: 11
• Dd: 4
(Balanced use of location with emphasis on commonly perceived areas)
Determinants:
• Form (F): 12
• Form-Color (FC): 4
• Color-Form (CF): 1
• Pure Color (C): 0
• Movement (M): 3
• Human Movement (M): 2
• Animal Movement (FM): 1
• Shading (Sum Shading = 1)
(Good form dominance, adequate modulation of affect)
Form Quality (FQ):
• FQ+: 18
• FQ0: 5
• FQ–: 0
(High reality testing, absence of perceptual distortion)
Content Analysis:
• Human: 7
• Animal: 5
• Object: 6
• Anatomy: 1
• Nature: 2
(No unusual or morbid content; responses within normal range)
Special Scores:
• None noted
(No evidence of thought disorder, inappropriate logic, or disturbed content)
Interpretation (Based on Exner’s Normative Data and Interpretive Guidelines)
Cognitive Functioning:
The individual exhibits organized, reality-based thinking with intact logical processing. High
form-quality responses and low unusual form responses suggest sound perceptual accuracy
and judgment (Exner, 2003).
Emotional Functioning:
Presence of FC > CF > C indicates that the client can modulate emotional expression using
cognitive control. Absence of pure color responses suggests no impulsive or affectively
driven tendencies.
Stress Tolerance and Control:
Adequate number of M responses with no special scores related to disorganization or
tension suggest resilience under stress. No indicators of impulsivity or dysregulation were
found.
Self and Others Perception:
Human content is healthy in proportion, suggesting balanced interpersonal perception. No
indicators of projection, paranoia, or boundary confusion.
Risk and Safety Assessment:
No presence of aggressive, violent, bizarre, or morbid content. No special scores indicative
of thought disorder (e.g., DV, DR, ALOG, FABCOM, INCOM). The protocol supports sound
mental health, emotional stability, and social responsibility.
Conclusion
Based on clinical interview, MSE, and Rorschach test findings, the individual demonstrates
psychological stability, intact judgment, and no indicators of emotional or behavioral risk.
The response protocol aligns with normative non-clinical samples.