CHAPTER - 1

INTRODUCTION

A purchase made with the intention of creating income or capital growth is known as an
investment. An asset's value increasing over time is referred to as appreciation. When a
person invests in an asset, they do not intend to utilize it as a source of immediate
consumption, but rather as a tool for future wealth creation. Investment is generally the
expenditure of a resource today—time, effort, money, or an asset—in the expectation of
earning a higher return than what was first invested. A financial asset, for instance, may be
bought by an investor now with the hope that it would provide income later on or can be
sold for a higher price.

According to the IMF, foreign direct investment (FDI) is a type of international investment
that represents the goal of acquiring a long-term stake by a resident entity of one country in
a business located in another economy. In order for there to be a lasting interest, there must
be a long-term relationship between the direct investor and the business as well as a large
amount of investor control over the business management. Because it promises to provide
financial resources and technology, FDI is frequently seen as a pathway for advancement
and development. The counter view is that FDI is a tool used by wealthy nations to manage
resources in emerging economies.

1.1 FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is an investment made by a foreign investor, company, or

government to obtain a position of ownership in a firm or project of another country.
Typically, FDI refers to a corporate decision to buy a sizable portion of a foreign company
or to acquire it altogether in order to expand operations to a new area. The term is often not
used to refer to a stock purchase in a single overseas firm. FDI is a crucial component of
global economic integration since it forges strong, long-lasting ties between the economies.

1
Foreign direct investments (FDIs) are sizeable, long-term investments made into a foreign
enterprise by a company or a government of another country. Investors of foreign direct
investment (FDI) frequently hold controlling positions in local businesses or joint ventures
and actively participate in the management. The investment could include obtaining a
source of raw materials, business expansion, or establishing a global presence. Over the
past few years, China and the United States have been the major receivers of FDI.
Historically, the US and other OECD nations have been the major donors to FDI outside of
their boundaries.

When considering a foreign direct investment (FDI), businesses or governments often

target companies or projects in open economies that have a competent labour force and
above-average growth potential for the investor. Countries having flexible government
regulations are preferred. FDI also includes the supply of management, technology, and
tools. Hence, it involves more than just capital expenditures. A major characteristic of FDI
is that it develops effective control over the foreign company or at least has a significant
influence over its decision-making.

An assembly facility is being built in Mexico by an automobile manufacturer based in

Japan. To sell its products in the Kenyan market, an Italian software business creates a sales
office in Kenya. To diversify, a sizable Australian mining corporation buys a smaller
Angolan company. All of these are instances of foreign direct investment, in which an
investor from a foreign country decides to acquire a stock or an interest in a firm.

With more than $1.8 trillion in foreign direct investments expected to be made in 2021, the
net quantities of money associated with FDI are enormous. In the year 2021, China, Canada,
Brazil, and India were the other leading FDI destinations after the United States. The
United States was likewise in first place for FDI outflows, followed by Germany, Japan,
China, and the United Kingdom. A nation's appeal as a long-term investment destination
can be determined by looking at FDI inflows as a share of its gross domestic product
(GDP).

2
FDIs can be "organic" or "inorganic". A foreign investor will inculcate money to develop
and speed up growth in established enterprises through organic investments. Inorganic
investments occur when an investing entity purchases a company in the target nation.

FDIs provide a much-needed boost to enterprises that may be in poor financial health in
developing and rising economies like India and other regions of South-East Asia. The
Indian government has taken a number of steps to guarantee that greater amounts of
investment flow into the nation's various industries such as IT, telecom, PSU oil refineries,
and defence manufacturing.

As a non-debt financial resource, foreign direct investment has the potential to significantly
contribute to India's economic growth.

1.2 TYPES OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

The global investment market comprises a wide area. Both small and large investors can
make investments in domestic and foreign businesses. Foreign direct investment, or FDI, is
defined as an investment made by one firm in another company operating in a foreign
country. Mergers, acquisitions, or joint ventures in the retail, service, logistics, or
manufacturing sectors can be a part of foreign direct investments. They indicate a global
business expansion plan.

3
Foreign direct investments are mainly of four types. They are as follows:

(A) Horizontal FDI

The most prominent kind of FDI is known as horizontal FDI, which focuses on investing
money in a foreign business that is part of the same industry as the one in which the FDI
investor operates. Here, a business invests in a foreign business that is based in a different
country but manufactures similar products as the investor. For example, Tata Motors
acquired Jaguar Land Rover which is the largest automotive manufacturer in the UK.

(B) Vertical FDI

A vertical FDI takes place when an investment is made in a firm that may or may not be in
the same sector but is still part of a conventional supply chain. Therefore, when vertical
FDI occurs, a company invests in a foreign company that may provide raw materials or
sells products. Vertical FDI is further divided into backward and forward vertical
integrations. For example, a Swiss coffee manufacturer Nescafé may invest in coffee farms
in nations like Brazil, Colombia, Vietnam, etc. Backward vertical integration is the term
used to describe this form of FDI when the investing business buys a supplier in the supply
chain. On the other hand, a company is considered to engage in forward vertical integration
when it invests in a foreign business that has a higher position in the supply chain. For
example, an Indian coffee company would want to buy a French supermarket brand.

(C) Conglomerate FDI

A conglomerate FDI is one when a company invests in a foreign company that operates in
an entirely different industry. Hence, the firm in which the investment is being made is
completely different from the investor's core business. The major aim of conglomerate FDI
is to expand the business into various niches and to begin new global ventures. These are
generally in the form of a joint venture because the investing business has no prior
experience in the field of expertise of the foreign company. For example, an Italian
automobile manufacturer may want to invest in a French luxury brand.

4
(D) Platform FDI

Platform foreign direct investment is the final category. Under this phenomenon, a
company expands to a foreign nation, and the goods produced are exported to a third nation.
For example, the French perfume company Chanel established a production facility in the
USA to export its goods to several American, Asian, and European nations.

1.3 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF FOREIGN DIRECT

INVESTMENT

FDI delivers knowledge, technology, skills, and jobs in addition to money. The main
advantages of foreign direct investment are as follows:

 FDI promotes economic growth

FDI is a nation's main source of foreign investment and growing earnings. It
frequently leads to the creation of manufacturing and assembling units in the host
nation, where local resources such as raw materials and labour are used. Based on
the employees' skill levels, this procedure is repeated.
 Finance and technology industries benefit from FDI
The FDI procedure is reliable. It provides a number of instruments to the host nation
that they may use to their benefit. For example, when FDI takes place, the recipient
enterprises are given access to the most recent instruments in terms of finance,
technology, and operational procedures. The local economy gradually adopts these
new, improved technologies and procedures, which increases the efficiency and
effectiveness of the fin-tech sector.
 FDI generates more employment opportunities
Service and industrial sectors of the host country benefit from a rise in FDI,
particularly in emerging nations, and this leads to the development of employment
in those industries. In turn, employment generates new sources of income for a
large number of people. As a result, people spend their money which ultimately
increases the purchasing power of the host country.

5
  FDI enhances the standard of living/ FDI helps in the development of human
resources
FDI helps in the development of human resources, particularly when training,
technology, and best practices are transferred. Employees sometimes referred to as
human capital, receive proper training and development of their abilities which
contributes to an increase in their general knowledge. However, human resource
development boosts a nation's human capital quotient when its overall effects on the
economy are taken into consideration. As resources increase, they may train others
and have a positive impact on the economy.
 Other Advantages/ Miscellaneous
FDI has several other advantages which cannot be ignored. For instance, FDI aids
in the development of a nation's underdeveloped regions and also helps in
transforming the host country into an industrial hub. Products made by FDI can be
sold domestically and internationally, adding a crucial new source of income. FDI
increases a nation's capital inflow, exchange rate stability, and market competition.
Lastly, it also strengthens international relations.

Like any other investment alternative, foreign direct investment has both advantages and
disadvantages. Some major disadvantages of FDI are as follows:

 Limiting domestic investment

The development of domestic businesses is hindered by FDI because resources are
diverted to new industries and organizations in other nations, and local businesses
begin to spend less on their own domestic products.
 Increased cost of products
In order to get a good return on investment, FDI used for the development of
resources and capacity may occasionally result in higher prices of produced goods.
 Lack of profitability from an economic standpoint
From the investor's perspective, foreign direct investments in some businesses can
first seem capital-intensive, but later they might be found to be unprofitable.

6
  Political risks
A change in the country's political landscape might make it riskier for foreign
investors to invest in assets and real estate.
 Lack of positive outlook
Many nations believe that foreign direct investment will lead to the formation of
economic colonialism with overall control over the markets and economy. Due to
this, host nations become unresponsive to the demand for investments from foreign
businesses.

1.4 FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN THE INDIAN ECONOMY

Foreign direct investment (FDI) has a long history in India. In the early post-independence
period, the government pursued a policy of import substitution and industrialization, and
FDI was not encouraged. However, in the 1980s, the government began to liberalize its
economy and encourage FDI as a means of promoting economic growth and development.
Since then, the government has taken a number of measures to encourage FDI in the
country. These measures have included:

 Liberalizing the FDI policy: In the 1990s, the government began to liberalize its
FDI policy by allowing FDI in a wider range of sectors and relaxing the rules for
obtaining approvals for FDI.
 Simplifying the process of obtaining approvals: In the 2000s, the government
simplified the process of obtaining approvals for FDI by introducing a single-
window system and reducing the number of approvals required.
 Providing various incentives: The government has also provided various tax
rebates and other incentives to encourage FDI in the country. These have included
tax holidays, exemptions from customs duties, and subsidies for setting up
industries in certain areas.

As a result of these measures, India has attracted a large amount of FDI in recent years,
particularly in sectors such as manufacturing, telecommunications, and construction. In
2021, India was the fifth-largest recipient of FDI in the world, with inflows totaling over
$60 billion.
7
In India, FDI is governed by the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the FDI
policy of the Government of India. FDI plays a significant role in the Indian economy as it
brings in capital, technology, and management expertise from abroad. It also contributes to
the job creation and the transfer of technology and skills to the local economy. The Indian
government has taken a number of measures to encourage FDI in the country, including
liberalizing its FDI policy, simplifying the process of obtaining approvals for FDI, and
providing various tax and other incentives for FDI. As a result, India has attracted a large
amount of FDI in recent years, particularly in sectors such as manufacturing,
telecommunications, and construction.

However, FDI can also have some negative effects on the economy, such as increased
competition for domestic firms and potential impacts on the balance of payments.
Therefore, the government has also put in place certain regulations and restrictions on FDI
in certain sectors to protect the interests of domestic firms and the overall economy.

The Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) is a law in India that regulates all
foreign exchange transactions in the country. It was enacted in 1999 to replace the Foreign
Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), which had been in place since 1973. FEMA applies to
all transactions involving foreign exchange, including foreign direct investment (FDI),
foreign portfolio investment, trade in goods and services, and borrowing and lending in
foreign currency. It also applies to the transactions of foreign exchange by individuals,
firms, and companies in India.

The main objectives of FEMA are to facilitate external trade and payment and to promote
the orderly development and maintenance of foreign exchange market in India. It also aims
to protect the interests of foreign exchange earners and to help the orderly development of
the foreign exchange market in India. FEMA is administered by the Reserve Bank of India
(RBI), which is the central bank of India. The RBI has the power to issue regulations and
guidelines to implement the provisions of FEMA. It also has the power to enforce the
provisions of the act and to take action against any person or entity that violates the
provisions of FEMA.

8
The Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy of the Government of India is the set of
guidelines and regulations that govern the inflow of foreign investment into the country.
The policy is aimed at promoting economic growth and development through the inflow of
capital, technology, and management expertise from abroad.

The FDI policy in India is administered by the Department of Industrial Policy and
Promotion (DIPP), which is a department of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. The
DIPP is responsible for formulating and implementing the FDI policy, as well as for issuing
guidelines and clarifications on the policy. The FDI policy in India is governed by the
Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and is reviewed and updated regularly by the
government to reflect the changing economic conditions and needs of the country. The FDI
policy in India is generally liberal, with foreign investment allowed in a wide range of
sectors.

However, certain sectors are restricted or require government approval for foreign
investment. These sectors include defense, atomic energy, and news and current affairs
television channels. In recent years, the government has taken a number of measures to
further liberalize and simplify the FDI policy in India, including introducing a single-
window system for obtaining approvals, reducing the number of approvals required, and
providing various tax and other incentives for FDI. These measures have helped to make
India one of the top destinations for foreign investment in the world.

Routes through which FDI occurs in India

Foreign direct investment (FDI) refers to investment made by foreign investors in

businesses or companies operating in a foreign country. In India, FDI is allowed through
various channels, including:

A. Automatic route: FDI in certain sectors, such as banking, construction, and

pharmaceuticals, is allowed through the automatic route, which means that foreign
investors do not need prior approval from the government to make investments.

9
 Here are a few examples of sectors in which FDI is allowed through the automatic
route in India:
i. Banking: Foreign investors can invest up to 74% in private sector banks and
up to 49% in public sector banks through the automatic route.
ii. Construction: Foreign investors can invest in the construction sector,
including the development of townships, housing, and built-up
infrastructure, through the automatic route.
iii. Pharmaceuticals: Foreign investors can invest in the pharmaceutical sector
through the automatic route, subject to certain conditions such as the
requirement to produce drugs for the domestic market and for export.
iv. Telecommunications: Foreign investors can invest in the
telecommunications sector, including the provision of telecom services,
through the automatic route.
v. Retail: Foreign investors can invest in single-brand retail through the
automatic route, subject to certain conditions such as the requirement to
source at least 30% of the value of goods from India.
vi. Power: Foreign investors can invest in the power sector, including the
generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity, through the
automatic route.
vii. Insurance: Foreign investors can invest up to 49% in insurance companies
through the automatic route.
B. Government route: FDI in sectors that are not covered under the automatic route
requires prior approval from the government. The government can grant approval
through the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) or the Cabinet Committee
on Economic Affairs (CCEA). Here are a few examples of sectors in which FDI
requires prior approval from the government through the Foreign Investment
Promotion Board (FIPB) or the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) in
India:

10
 i. Defense: Foreign investors can invest in the defense sector, subject to
security clearance and certain conditions such as the requirement to transfer
technology and production in India.
ii. Media: Foreign investors can invest in the media sector, including print
media and electronic media, subject to certain conditions such as the
requirement to seek prior approval for the acquisition of controlling stakes.
iii. Civil aviation: Foreign investors can invest in the civil aviation sector,
including the operation of air transport services and maintenance, repair, and
overhaul of aircraft, subject to certain conditions.
iv. Atomic energy: Foreign investors can invest in the atomic energy sector,
subject to certain conditions such as the requirement to seek prior approval
for investments in sensitive areas.
v. Real estate: Foreign investors can invest in the real estate sector, including
the construction of residential and commercial properties, subject to certain
conditions such as the requirement to seek prior approval for the acquisition
of controlling stakes.
C. Portfolio investment: Foreign investors can also invest in Indian companies
through portfolio investment, which refers to the purchase of securities such as
stocks and bonds without acquiring a controlling stake in the company. Foreign
investors can make portfolio investments in Indian companies through various
channels, including the stock exchange and mutual funds. Here is an example of a
foreign investor making a portfolio investment in an Indian company:

A foreign investor based in the United States wants to invest in the Indian stock
market. The investor opens a brokerage account with an Indian brokerage firm and
deposits funds into the account. The investor then uses the funds to purchase shares
of Indian companies listed on the stock exchange, such as Tata Consultancy Services
or Reliance Industries. The investor does not acquire a controlling stake in these
companies and is not involved in their management or decision-making.

11
 Another example of a foreign investor making a portfolio investment in an Indian
company is through mutual funds. A foreign investor can invest in an Indian mutual
fund, which pools together the funds of multiple investors and invests in a
diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, and other securities. The foreign investor does
not have a direct ownership interest in the individual securities held by the mutual
fund, but rather holds a share of the mutual fund itself.

D. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): Foreign investors can also enter the Indian
market through M&A by acquiring or merging with existing Indian companies.
Here are a few examples of foreign investors making M&A in the Indian market:
i. In 2018, Japanese conglomerate SoftBank Group acquired a 20% stake in Indian
ride-hailing firm Ola for $400 million.
ii. In 2019, American pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. acquired the Indian
generic drug manufacturer Strides Pharma Science for $1.2 billion.
iii. In 2020, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding acquired a
controlling stake in Indian online retailer Snapdeal for $900 million.
iv. In 2021, American software company Adobe Systems acquired the Indian start-
up Makani Creatives, which provides content creation tools for video and
animation.
E. Joint ventures: Foreign investors can enter into joint ventures with Indian
companies, in which both parties share ownership and control of the venture. A
joint venture (JV) refers to a business partnership in which two or more companies
come together to jointly undertake a specific project or business activity. Here are a
few examples of foreign investors entering into joint ventures in the Indian market:
i. In 2014, American automobile manufacturer Ford entered into a joint venture
with Indian company Mahindra & Mahindra to develop and manufacture
electric vehicles in India.
ii. In 2018, Japanese company Toshiba entered into a joint venture with Indian
firm L&T to manufacture and sell nuclear power plant equipment in India.

12
 iii. In 2019, American multinational General Electric entered into a joint venture
with Indian conglomerate Adani Group to develop and operate renewable
energy projects in India.
iv. In 2020, French company Airbus entered into a joint venture with Indian firm
Tata Advanced Systems to manufacture aerospace components in India.

In conclusion, foreign direct investment (FDI) has played a significant role in the
development of the Indian economy. FDI has contributed to the transfer of technology,
capital, and expertise to India, and has created employment opportunities and increased
exports. FDI is allowed in India through various channels, including the automatic route,
government route, portfolio investment, mergers and acquisitions, and joint ventures. The
government of India has implemented policies to encourage FDI and has liberalized FDI
rules in various sectors. However, FDI also comes with its own set of challenges, such as
potential negative impacts on domestic industry and concerns over the loss of control over
strategic assets. It is important for the government to strike a balance between encouraging
FDI and protecting the interests of the domestic economy. Overall, FDI has the potential to
bring significant benefits to the Indian economy, and it will be important for the
government to continue to carefully manage and regulate FDI flows in order to maximize
these benefits.

1.5 CONTRIBUTION OF THE STUDY

This study can contribute to our understanding of how FDI impacts the economy and the
challenges that policymakers and businesses face in attracting and managing FDI. Some
potential contributions of this study are as follows:

1. Providing insights into the factors that influence the flow of FDI into India, such as
economic conditions, policy measures, and the attractiveness of different sectors
and regions.
2. Identifying the economic and social impacts of FDI in India, including its effects on
economic growth and development, employment, wages, and technological
progress.

13
 3. Analyzing the challenges and issues related to attracting and managing FDI in India,
such as competition with other countries, regulatory and legal hurdles, and the
potential for negative impacts on local communities.
4. Offering recommendations for policy measures that could improve the effectiveness
of FDI in promoting economic growth and development in India.
5. Improving our understanding of the broader economic and political context in
which FDI takes place in India, including the role of global economic trends and the
influence of other countries on the flow of FDI.

1.6 IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY

This study could have a number of implications for policymakers, businesses, and other
stakeholders. Some potential implications could include:

1. Providing policymakers with a better understanding of the factors that influence the
flow of FDI into India and the potential impacts of FDI on the economy. This could
inform the development of more effective policy measures to attract and manage
FDI.
2. Enhancing the competitiveness of the Indian economy by identifying the sectors
and regions that are most attractive to FDI and the policy measures that can enhance
their attractiveness.
3. Facilitating the strategic planning of businesses by providing insights into the
opportunities and challenges presented by FDI in different sectors and regions of
India.
4. Improving the management of FDI by identifying best practices for attracting,
managing, and leveraging FDI to maximize its benefits and minimize any negative
impacts.
5. Contributing to a broader understanding of the economic and political context in
which FDI takes place in India, including the role of global economic trends and the
influence of other countries on the flow of FDI.

1.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

14
This study can provide valuable insights into the factors that influence the flow of FDI into
India and its impact on the economy. However, this study subject to a number of limitations
that could affect the accuracy and completeness of the findings. Some of the limitations
faced by the author while conducting the study are as follows:

1. Data availability and quality: The availability and quality of data on FDI in India is
limited, which could hinder the author's ability to accurately analyze and interpret
the data.

2. Methodological challenges: It is challenging for the author to select and implement

the best appropriate research methods to study FDI in the Indian economy.
3. The complexity of the topic: FDI is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that
can be influenced by a wide range of factors. Therefore, it is difficult for the author
to fully capture the nuances and dynamics of FDI in India.
4. Time and resource constraints: Conducting a study on FDI in the Indian economy
may require a significant investment of time and resources, which is constrained by
the author's availability and budget.
5. Political and social sensitivity: The topic of FDI in the Indian economy is politically
and socially sensitive, which affects the ability of the author to access information
and data, as well as the willingness of stakeholders to cooperate with the study.

15
 CHAPTER -2

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

The comprehensive literature centered on economies about empirical findings and

theoretical rationale tends to demonstrate that FDI is necessary for sustained economic
growth and development of any economy in this era of globalization.

After examining the existing literature on studies concerned with exploring the
determinants of FDI it has been found that these studies evaluated the various factors
affecting FDI inflows in some developing and developed countries. Most of the studies
have found the positive as well as significant influence of some empirical variables like
GDP per capita GDP, rate of public sector investment, terms of deposits, terms of trade,
change in imports and exports, commercial interest rate, domestic investment, employment,
low rate of tax, labour supply, foreign exchange reserves and low borrowing cost on FDI
inflows.

Some theoretical variables such as fiscal incentives, selective policies, infrastructure,

innovative activities, level of education, strong IPR protection and labour quality have also
been found to have a positive impact on FDI inflows in the case of developing and
developed countries. The variables such as interest rates, inflation, debt service ratio and
high labour cost have been found to have a negative impact on FDI inflows.

From the review of the literature regarding determinants of FDI it has been observed that
researchers agreed about the impact of many variables on FDI but there is a lack of
uniformity of opinion regarding the influence of some variables such as inflation, exchange
rate, openness, and GDP. foreign exchange reserves and long-term debt on FDI inflows.
This necessitates reinvestigation of factors influencing FDI in the case of India.

Many studies have been conducted on the issue of foreign direct investment. In fact, the
area of FDI offers such a large scope that scholars may attempt to investigate various new

16
issues. Hence, in every study one finds a different approach and different aspects which
were not covered by the earlier studies. In the present study, primary as well as secondary
data have been used for analyzing the foreign direct investment and industrial development
in India. There is still a large scope of research in this area. A review of a few important
and relevant studies in this area has been elaborated in the study.

Pooja Srivastava (2021) in her study concluded that market size, infrastructure facilities,
labour cost, agglomeration economies are important factors in determining the inflow of
FDI along with the level of domestic investment. In India domestic investment negatively
affect the inflow of FDI and it is shown from her study that FDI does not have a significant
impact on the domestic investment in return. Reason behind no significant impact of FDI
on domestic investment could be various. Determinants of domestic investment might be
different and domestic investment might get affected majorly by other factors not solely by
the FDI itself. This negative relation also explains the nature of FDI inflows coming into
India indicating it to be resource and market-oriented.

Rakesh R. and Bajpai (2016) observed that Trade GDP, Reserves GDP, Exchange rate,
Financial Position, R&D GDP and FDIG are the main determinants of FDI inflows to the
country. In other words. these macroeconomic variables have a profound impact on the
inflows of FDI in India. Results from their study reveal that Trade GDP. Reserves GDP,
and FIN, Position variables exhibit a positive relationship with FDI while R&D GDP and
Exchange rate variables exhibit a negative relationship with FDI inflows. Hence, Trade
GDP, Reserves GDP, and FIN. Position variables are the pull factors for FDI inflows to the
country and R&D GDP and Exchange rate are deterrent forces for FDI inflows into the
country. It is also concluded that FDI is a significant factor influencing the level of
economic growth in India. It provides a sound base for economic growth and development
by enhancing the financial position of the country. It also contributes to the GDP and
foreign exchange reserves of the country.

In the study conducted by Viney Narang (2019), a comparison has been made between
India and China in terms of FDI inflows. Though Foreign Direct Investment inflows into

17
India have increased steadily, but it is still less than that of China. This study gives an
insight in to the factors that determine the FDI attraction for any country and the impact of
FDI on macro-economic parameters of India and China. It is concluded that Privatizing
banking sector and oil sector, reducing Government intervention, providing more economic
freedom to investors, opening national economy to level playing field to Multinational
Corporations by reduced tariff and taxes, proactively engaging Indian diaspora/expatriates,
flexible labour laws and permitting free entry and exit to transnational corporations will
help India attract greater FDI.

Namdev and, Bandekar Bipin (2019) pointed out that five factors namely Market size
(GDP), Infrastructure development (EPC), Imports of goods and services, Availability of
Natural Resources and Political Stability create a positive impact on the inflow of FDI to
developing nations. Out of these, three factors i.e. Market size (GDP), Infrastructure
development (EPC) and Political Stability are positive and key factors in oil exporting
nations whereas five factors i.e. Infrastructure development (EPC), Imports, Natural
Resources, Political Stability, Reserves and Corruption control are positive and significant
in non–oil exporting nations. The study also found that three factors viz. Economy size
(GDP), Trade openness and Infrastructure Development (EPC) have a positive impact on
FDI outflows whereas Imports and Exports of goods and services create a negative impact
on the flow of FDI out of developing nations and oil-exporting developing nations.
Whereas, along with Economy size (GDP), three more factors i.e. Labour cost, Natural
resources and Corruption control are found to be the key determinants for flow of FDI out
of non-oil exporting developing nations.

Chaturvedi L. (2011) analyzed that the Sector-wise Analysis of FDI Inflow in India
reveals that maximum FDI has taken place in the service sector including the
telecommunication, information technology, travel and many others. Chaturvedi reviewed
the recent trends and patterns and tries to identify determinants of such investment. As
compared to the eighties, the character of service sector FDI flows has gone through several
transformations. In the seventies it is largely a phenomenon led by firms from hotels &
restaurants, finance and marketing segments and is being directed at developing regions in

18
overwhelming cases and is mostly minority-owned. In contrast, during nineties it is
predominantly led by the software segment of the service sector, locationally developed
country-oriented and is largely majority-owned ventures.

A research carried out by Alfaro (2003) also analyzed the impact of FDI on growth, but in
different sectors of the economy - primary, manufacturing and service. The study resulted
in FDI having a negative impact on growth for the primary sector, which can be justified
that industries like agriculture and mining have minimal scope for the host country. On the
other hand, the manufacturing sector showed a positive result, implying that FDI does
increase the GDP of host countries with respect to industries under this sector.
Theoretically, the advantages of FDI seem to be more inclined towards the industrial sector.
The results of this study show a positive but insignificant impact of FDI on growth which is
regarded as an ambiguous effect. It may not be necessary that FDI is always beneficial to
host economies as it is highly dependent on the economic nature of the country, hence
attracting different forms of FDI flows into each sector distinctively.

Meyer K. E. (2003) in his paper "Foreign Direct investment in Emerging Economies"

focuses on the impact of FDI on host economies and on policy and managerial implications
arising from this (potential) impact. The study finds out that as emerging economies
integrate into the global economies international trade and investment will continue to
accelerate.

Singh K. (2005) explored the uneven beginnings of FDI, in India and examines the
Developments (economic and political) relating to the trends in two sectors: Industry and
Infrastructure and sub sector Telecom. The study revealed that Foreign Direct Investment
has a major role to play in the economic development of the host country. Most of the
countries have been making use of foreign investment and foreign technology to accelerate
the place of their economic growth. Over the years, foreign direct investment has helped
the economies of the host countries to obtain a launching pad from where they can make
further improvements. Any forms of foreign direct investment pumps in a lot of capital
knowledge and technological resources into the economy of the country. This helps in

19
taking the particular host economy ahead. FDI ensures a huge amount of domestic capital,
production level and employment opportunities in the developing countries, which a major
step towards the economic growth of the country. Using a process framework this paper
examines Foreign Direct Investment inflow into to India and share of top ten investing
countries flow into India. Singh also investigated that the sharp rise in OFDI since 1991 has
been accompanied by a shift in the geographical and sectoral focus of Indian investments.
Enterprises that are already engaged in exporting are more likely to be outward investors.
Study also concludes that policy liberalization of the 1990s has encouraged Indian
enterprises to venture abroad.

Agarwal (2000) analyzed economic impact of FDI in South Asian countries: India,
Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal. This study found that FDI inflows in South
Asia were associated with a manifold increase in the investment by national investors,
suggesting that there exist complementarily and linkage effects between foreign and
national investment. The impact of FDI inflows on growth rate of GDP is found to be
negative prior to 1980, mildly positive for early eighties and strongly positive over the late
eighties and early nineties. It is concluded that FDI is more likely to be beneficial in the
more open economies.

Pradhan Jaya Prakash (2003) while empirical verifying the role of FDI in the growth
process of developing countries found that the growth effect of domestic investment is
relatively more sensitive than FDI to the level of human development. For developing
countries with higher human development, the impact of domestic investment on growth is
not only positive but also statistically significant, whereas, it has no significant impact in
the case of developing countries with lower human development The study found that the
international linkage has a major role in the growth process, if the country has a lower
human development.

The study of Nawal Kisor (2003) expressed that FDI has helped in accelerating the
economic growth of many countries. According to the study, the importance of FDI is more

20
in case of developing countries, which require capital, technology and better management
for faster economic growth.

A study on "Impact of foreign direct investment on Indian economy since economic

liberalization" by Praveen Jha (2005) reveals that the FDI is an important avenue through
which investment takes place in a country, the importance of FDI exceeds beyond the
financial capital that flows into the country.

According to Nagesh Kumar (2000), the expansion in the magnitude of FDI inflows
during 1990s is not due to reforms alone. It reflects, in part, the dramatic expansion in the
global FDI flows to developing countries from about $35 billion per year on average during
1987-92 to $166 billion in 1998. Majority foreign ownership, which was restricted to
certain exceptional cases during the 1970s and 1980s because of regulations, is becoming
more popular again. As noted by Nagesh Kumar, majority of approvals in the 1990s have
been in the range of 50-100 percent foreign ownership range with a third accounted for by
wholly foreign owned subsidiaries. A number of multinational corporations (MNCs) have
taken advantage of the new rules to increase their stake in the existing affiliates in the
country. The importance of joint venture mode of operations has declined with
liberalization. Moreover, many MNCs are opting the route of acquisition of existing
enterprises to enter Indian markets.

Shri Prakash and Sharma S. (2013) preferred input output to econometric modeling,
since regression gives only direct impact multipliers irrespective of the degree of
sophistication of modeling, 10 model easily captured both direct and indirect output effects
of FDI. Long term economic growth can be explained as the combination of growth in its
sources, i.e. the increases in factor inputs (capital and labour) and in total factor
productivity (TFP), which reflects technological advances and other efficiency
improvements in resource utilization. FDI contributes significantly towards growth i.e. it
increases capital stock, boosts human capital accumulation and speeds up technological
advances in host countries. Nevertheless, the most direct impact of FDI on host economies

21
is through its role in the accumulation of investment capital. A lot of research work has
been accomplished regarding investigation of different aspects related to FDL.

Dunning John H. (2004), in his study "Institutional Reform, FDI and European Transition
Economics" studied the significance of institutional infrastructure and development as a
determinant of FDI inflows into the European Transition Economies. The study examines
the critical role of the institutional environment (comprising both institutions and the
strategies and policies of organizations relating to these institutions) in reducing the
transaction costs of both domestic and cross border business activity. By setting up an
analytical framework the study identifies the determinants of FDI, and how these had
changed over recent years.

Tomsaz Mickiewicz, Slavo Rasosevic and Urmas Varblane (2005), in their study, "The
Value of Diversity: Foreign Direct Investment and Employment in Central Europe during
Economic Recovery", examine the role of FDI in job creation and job preservation as well
as their role in changing the structure of employment. Their analysis refers to Czech
Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Estonia. They present descriptive stage model of FDI
progression into Transition economy. They analyzed the employment aspects of the model.
The study concluded that the role of FDI in employment creation/ preservation has been
most successful in Hungary than in Estonia. The paper also finds out that the increasing
differences in sectoral distribution of FDI employment across countries are closely relates
to FDI inflows per capita. The bigger diversity of types of FDI is more favorable for the
host economy. There is higher likelihood that it will lead to more diverse types of spillovers
and skill transfers. If policy is unable to maximize the scale of FDI inflows then policy
makers should focus much more on attracting diverse types of FDI.

Vittorio Daniele and Ugo Marani (2007), in their study, "Do institutions matter for FDI?
A Comparative analysis for the MENA countries" analyze the underpinning factors of
foreign Direct Investments towards the MENA countries. The main interpretative
hypothesis of the study is based on the significant role of the quality of institutions to
attract FDI. In MENA experience the growth of FDI flows proved to be notably inferior to

22
that recorded in the EU or in Asian economies, such as China and India. The study suggests
as institutional and legal reform are fundamental steps to improve the attractiveness of
MENA in terms of FDI.

According to the empirical study of Jayaraman and Singh (2007), the relationship
between FDI and growth of Fiji was investigated through a multivariate modelling strategy.
The ADF test showed results that all the variables, real GDP, real FDI inflows and
employment were of order one. The bounds testing approach to cointegration depicted two
cointegration relationships among the variables when the endogenous variables were
formal sector employment and GDP. Based on this, the ARDL estimator showed that both
FDI and GDP have a statistically positive and significant impact on the employment of Fiji.
The Granger causality testing procedure was carried out which found a unidirectional
causality running from FDI to GDP in the short run and a unidirectional causality running
from FDI to employment in the long run. The study recommended that apart from
continuing its current proactive policies to attract FDI inflows, Fiji should also retain these
inflows by maintaining an appropriate political environment which includes political
stability.

Guruswamy Mohan, Sharma Kamal, Mohanty Jeevan Prakash, Korah Thomas J.

(2010), in their paper, "FDI in India's Retail Sector:" More Bad than Good", find that retail
in India is severely constrained by limited availability of bank finance, dislocation of labor.
The study suggests suitable measures like need for setting up of national commission to
study the problems of the retail sector and to evolve policies that will enable it to cope with
FDI. The study concludes that the entry of FDI in India's retailing sector is inevitable.
However, with the instruments of public policy in its hands, the government can slow down
the process. The government can try to ensure that the domestic and foreign players are
more or less on an equal footing and that the domestic traders are not at a special
disadvantage. The small retailers must be given the opportunity to provide more
personalized service, so that their higher costs are taken advantage of by large supermarkets
and hypermarkets.

23
Pradhan J. P. (2004) in his study - "The determinants of outward foreign direct investment:
a firm-level analysis of Indian manufacturing", found that several firm-specific
characteristics such as age, size, R&D intensity, skill intensity and export orientation are
observed to be important explanatory factors in the outward foreign direct investment (O-
FDI) activity of Indian firms. The impact of age and size on O-FDI has been observed to be
non-linear. The product differentiation activities and the productivity of firms are other
useful factors in overseas production expansion in certain industries. The study reveals that
the performance of these firm-specific variables is subject to sectoral dynamics.
Internationalization of production activities of Indian firms has been observed to be partly
fueled by policy liberalization during the 1990s.

Park Jongsoo (2004), conducted a study on "Korean Perspective on FDI in India: Hyundai
Motors Industrial Cluster" indicates that industrial clusters are playing an important role in
economic activity. The key to promoting FDI inflows into India may lie in industries and
products that are technology- intensive and have economies of scale and significant
domestic content. FDI is not prominent in all industries. Within the OECD countries, at
year end 2011, 52% of inward FDI positions were in services, of which financial
intermediation represented 20% of the total FDI inward positions. At the same time, FDI
inward positions in agriculture and fishing hardly registered (0.1% of total FDI inward
positions).

Sarma EAS (2005), in his paper "Need for Caution in Retail FDI" examines the constraints
faced by traditional retailers in the supply chain and give an emphasis on establishment of a
package of safety nets as Thailand has done. India should also draw lessons from
restrictions placed on the expansion of organized retailing, in terms of sourcing, capital
requirement, zoning etc., in other Asian countries. The article comments on the retail FDI
report that as commissioned by the Department of Consumer Affairs and suggests the need
for a more comprehensive study. Generally, firms seem to have to grow up to a certain size
before FDI becomes feasible. However, although most FDI, by value, is carried out by
large MNCs the share of small and medium sized MNCs of total FDI grows significantly
when looking at the absolute numbers of FDI projects.

24
Nirupam Bajpai and Jeffrey D. Sachs (2006), in their paper "Foreign Direct Investment
in India: Issues and Problems", attempted to identify the issues and problems associated
with India's current FDI regimes, and more importantly the other associated factors
responsible for India's unattractiveness as an investment location. Despite India offering a
large domestic market, rule of law, low labour costs, and a well working democracy, her
performance in attracting FDI flows have been far from satisfactory. The study concluded
that a restricted FDI regime, high import tariffs, exit barriers for firms, stringent labor laws,
poor quality infrastructure, centralized decision-making processes, and a very limited scale
of export processing zones make India an unattractive investment location.

Kulwinder Singh (2005), in his study "Foreign Direct Investment in India: A Critical
analysis of FDI from 1991-2005" explores the uneven beginnings of FDI, in India and
examines the developments (economic and political) relating to the trends in two sectors:
industry and infrastructure. The study concludes that the impact of the reforms in India on
the policy environment for FDI presents a mixed picture. The industrial reforms have gone
far, though they need to be supplemented by more infrastructure reforms, which are a
critical missing link.

Chandan Chakraborty, Peter Nunnenkamam (2004), in their study "Economic Reforms,

FDI and its Economic Effects in India" assess the growth implications of FDI in India by
subjecting industry- specific FDI and output data to Granger causality tests within a panel
co-integration framework. It turns out that the growth effects of FDI vary widely across
sectors. FDI stocks and output are mutually reinforcing in the manufacturing sector. In
sharp contrast, any causal relationship is absent in the primary sector. Most strikingly, the
study finds only transitory effects of FDI on output in the service sector, which attracted the
bulk of FDI in the post-reform era. These differences in the FDI- Growth relationship
suggest that FDI is unlikely to work wonders in India if only remaining regulations were
relaxed and still more industries opened up to FDI.

Basu P., Nayak N.C, Vani Archana (2007), in their paper "Foreign Direct Investment in
India: Emerging Horizon", intended to study the qualitative shift in the FDI inflows in India

25
in-depth in the last fourteen odd years as the bold new policy on economic front makes the
country progress in both quantity and the way country attracted FDI. It reveals that the
country is not only cost-effective but also hot destination for R&D activities. The study also
finds out that R&D as a significant determining factor for FDI inflows for most of the
industries in India. The software industry is showing intensive R&D activity, which has to
be channelized in the form of export promotion for penetration in the new markets. The
study also reveals strong negative influence of corporate tax on FDI inflows. To sum up, it
can be said that large domestic market, cheap labour, human capital, are the main
determinants of FDI inflows to India, however, its stringent labour laws, poor quality
infrastructure, centralize decision making processes, and a very limited numbers of SEZs
make India an unattractive investment location Basu tried to find the short run dynamics of
FDI and growth. The study reveals that GDP in India is not Granger caused by FDI; the
causality runs more from GDP to FDI and the trade liberalization policy of the Indian
government had some positive short run impact on the FDI flow.

A publication of the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation (2009)
indicates that FDI assists in increasing the income that is generated through revenues
realized through taxation. It also plays a crucial role in the context of the rise in the
productivity of the host countries.

Koshy Joseph (2006) described that the decision of permitting foreign direct investment
(FDI) in the retail sector has been a debate in India for a considerable period of time. Singh
& Dr. Mandeep (2010) says that Since the Indian retail sector is highly fragmented and
domestic retailers are in the process of consolidating their position, the opening up of the
FDI regime should be in a phased manner over 5 to 10 years’ time frame so as to give the
domestic retailers enough time to adjust the changes. Khatore, Prashant and Parekh
(2009) said that there is a need to re-look, clarify, and further liberalize the policy on
single- brand retailing to promote investments by global chains in India. Parekh and
Paresh (2010) state that it is worth debating whether it is really necessary to put conditions
such as mandatory rural employment creation and mandatory investment in back-end
infrastructure, etc. while permitting FDL.

26
Kalhan (2007) indicated that there has been a severe impact of malls on the unorganized
retail shops operating in the vicinity of malls. Mukherjee and Patel (2005) carried out a
broad-based survey on "FDI in the Retail Sector in India", which was sponsored by the
Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), vehemently
recommended the allowing of FDI in the organized format in the retail industry over a
period of five to six years to boost the speed at which the organized retail sector is growing.
They found that joint ventures with foreign retailers help the Indian industry to get access
to finance and global best practices. The New FDI policy has become a key battleground in
the emerging Multi-Brand Retail markets.

The above review of literature helps in identifying the research issues and gaps for the
present study. The foregoing review of empirical literature confirms/highlights the
following facts:

 Institutional infrastructure and development are the main determinants of FDI

inflows in the European transition economies. Institutional environment
(comprising both institutional strategies and policies of organizations relating to
these institutions) plays critical role in reducing the transaction costs of both
domestic and cross border business activity.
 FDI plays a crucial role in employment generation/ preservation.
 It is found that bigger diversity of types of FDI lead to more diverse types of
spillovers and skill transfers which proves more favourable for the host economy.
 It is also found that apart from market size, exports, infrastructure facilities,
institutions. source and destination countries, the concept of neighborhood and
extended neighborhood is also gaining importance especially in Europe, China and
India.
 In industrial countries high labour costs encourage outflows and discourage inflows
of FDI. The principal determinants of FDI in these countries are IT-related
investments, trade and cross-border mergers and acquisitions.

27
 Studies which underlie the effects of FDI on the host countries economic growth
shows that FDI enhance economic growth in developing economies but not in
developed economies.
 It is found that in developing economies FDI and economic growth are mutually
supporting. In other words, economic growth increases the size of the host country
market and strengthens the incentives for market seeking FDI.
 It is also observed that bidirectional causality exists between FDI and economic
growth i.e. growth in GDP attracts FDI and FDI also contributes to an increase in
output.
 Studies on developing countries of South, East and South East Asia shows that
fiscal incentives, low tariffs, BITS (Bilateral Investment Treaties) with developed
countries have a profound impact on the inflows of aggregate FDI to developing
countries.
 Studies on role of FDI in emerging economies shows that general institutional
framework, effectiveness of public sector administration and the availability of
infrastructural facilities enhance FDI inflows to these nations.
 FDI also enhance the chances of developing internationally competitive business
clusters. It is observed that countries pursuing export- led growth strategies reaps
enormous benefits from FDI.
 The main determinants of FDI in developing countries are inflation, infrastructural
facilities. debts, burden, exchange rate, FDI spillovers, stable political environment
etc.
 It is found that firms in cluster gain significantly from FDI in their region, within
industry and across other industries in the region.
 It is also observed that FDI have both short-run and long-run effect on the economy.
So, regulatory FDI guidelines must be formulated in order to protect developing
economies from the consequences of FDI flows.

28
 CHAPTER – 3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research methodology refers to the systematic and structured approach used to conduct
research. It involves a set of principles, techniques, and procedures used to collect, analyze,
and interpret data to answer research questions or test hypotheses. Research methodology is
a crucial aspect of any research study, as it provides a framework for conducting research in
a rigorous, reliable, and valid manner.

The research methodology typically includes several stages, such as:

 Formulating research questions or hypotheses

 Designing the research study, including selecting appropriate data collection
methods, such as surveys, experiments, case studies, or interviews
 Collecting data through observation, experimentation, surveys, or other methods
 Analyzing and interpreting the data using statistical or qualitative techniques
 Drawing conclusions based on the findings and assessing their implications for
theory or practice
 Reporting the research findings clearly and concisely, using appropriate academic
conventions.

Research methodology can vary depending on the research field and the nature of the
research question.

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is an essential aspect of international trade and economic
growth. Studying FDI requires a rigorous research methodology to ensure reliable and valid
results.

The first step in conducting research on FDI is to formulate the research question. The
research question should be specific, relevant, and feasible. In the context of this study, a

29
research question could be, "What are the factors that determine the inflow of foreign direct
investment in developing countries?"

The next step is to design the research study. The design of the study depends on the
research question and the available data sources. In the case of FDI, data can be obtained
from various sources, such as the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and national
statistical agencies. The data sources should be reliable, valid, and relevant to the research
question. The data should be collected for a specific period to ensure consistency and
comparability.

The data collection method for a study on FDI can be quantitative or qualitative.
Quantitative data collection involves the use of statistical methods to analyze data, while
qualitative data collection involves the use of interviews, focus groups, and case studies to
collect data. In the case of FDI, quantitative data collection methods can be used to analyze
the determinants of FDI inflows, such as market size, infrastructure, and trade openness.
Qualitative data collection methods can be used to gain a deeper understanding of the
factors that affect FDI inflows, such as political stability and institutional quality.

Once the data is collected, it should be analyzed using appropriate statistical or qualitative
techniques. The analysis should be based on the research question and the data collected.
For example, a regression analysis can be used to analyze the relationship between FDI
inflows and the determinants of FDI. The results of the analysis should be presented clearly
and concisely, using appropriate tables, charts, and graphs.

The findings of the study should be interpreted in the context of the research question and
the existing literature. The implications of the findings for policy and practice should be
discussed, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the study. The limitations of the
study should also be discussed, such as data availability and sample size.

Finally, the research findings should be reported in a well-written research paper or report.
The research paper should follow the academic conventions of the field, such as APA or

30
MLA. The research paper should be clear, concise, and well-structured, with a clear
introduction, methodology, results, and discussion sections.

In conclusion, studying foreign direct investment requires a rigorous research methodology

to ensure reliable and valid results. The research methodology should be based on the
research question, the available data sources, and the appropriate data collection and
analysis methods. The research findings should be interpreted in the context of the research
question and the existing literature, and the implications for policy and practice should be
discussed. A well-written research paper or report should be prepared to communicate the
research findings to a wider audience.

The qualitative research methodology is used in this study on foreign direct investment
(FDI) aims to understand the experiences, perspectives, and behaviors of stakeholders
involved in FDI, such as investors, host country governments, and local communities. Data
collection methods such as interviews, focus groups, and case studies are used to gather
rich and detailed information on the complex and dynamic nature of FDI. The data is
analyzed through techniques such as thematic analysis and content analysis to identify
patterns, themes, and underlying factors influencing FDI decisions and outcomes.
Qualitative research in the context of FDI is particularly relevant given the diverse
economic, political, and social factors influencing FDI decisions and outcomes, which
cannot be captured by quantitative data alone. Overall, qualitative research can provide
valuable insights into the processes and challenges associated with FDI and inform policy
and practice aimed at attracting and managing foreign investment.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
In the past studies regarding the determinants of FDI and its challenges, it has been
observed that researchers agreed about the impact of many variables on FDI but there is a
lack of uniformity of opinion regarding the influence of some variables such as inflation,
exchange rate, openness, and GDP, foreign exchange reserves and long-term debt on FDI
inflows. Also, no clear factors hindering the FDI inflows have been determined so there is a

31
need to explore the challenges to FDI in India. This necessitates reinvestigation of factors
influencing FDI in the case of India.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The objectives of this study are to examine the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on
the Indian economy. FDI refers to investments made by foreign companies or individuals in
domestic businesses or assets. It is an important source of capital for many countries,
including India, and has the potential to bring about significant economic benefits.
However, the effects of FDI on the host country's economy can be complex and varied.
This study aims to shed light on the various ways in which FDI has impacted the Indian
economy, including its impact on economic growth, employment, trade, and technological
development. By understanding the objectives of this study, we can better understand the
role of FDI in the Indian economy and identify opportunities for further growth and
development.

The major objectives of this study are:

1. To understand the meaning of FDI

2. To analyze the distribution of FDI in India
3. To study the challenges of FDI in India
4. To study the overall impact of FDI on the Indian Economy

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

There are several potential avenues for further study of foreign direct investment (FDI) in
the Indian economy and its issues and challenges. Some possible directions for future
research include:

1. Examining the sectoral distribution of FDI in India and its impact on economic
growth and development. This could involve analyzing the performance of different
industries in terms of attracting FDI, as well as the economic and social impacts of
FDI on different regions of the country.

32
2. Analyzing the role of policy in shaping the flow of FDI into India. This could
include studying the effectiveness of different policy measures in attracting FDI,
such as tax incentives and investment promotion campaigns.

3. Investigating the relationship between FDI and trade in the Indian economy. This
could involve examining the extent to which FDI leads to increased exports and
imports, as well as the role of FDI in supporting domestic production for the
domestic and international markets.
4. Assessing the impact of FDI on employment and wages in the Indian economy.
This could involve analyzing the extent to which FDI leads to job creation and wage
growth, as well as any potential negative impacts on workers.
5. Examining the role of FDI in promoting technological transfer and innovation in the
Indian economy. This could involve studying the extent to which FDI leads to the
adoption of new technologies and processes, as well as the impact of such adoption
on productivity and competitiveness.

33
 CHAPTER – 4

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

4.1 INTRODUCTION

The Indian economy is one of the fastest-growing economies in the world, with a current
population of over 1.3 billion. Since its independence in 1947, the Indian economy has
witnessed significant growth, diversification, and transformation. As of 2022, it is the fifth-
largest economy in the world by nominal GDP and the third-largest by purchasing power
parity (PPP).

The Indian economy is a mixed economy with both public and private sectors playing
significant roles. Agriculture, manufacturing, and services are the three main sectors of the
Indian economy. Agriculture is the primary source of livelihood for a majority of the
population, and it contributes around 20% of the country's GDP. The manufacturing sector
accounts for about 25% of GDP, with industries such as textiles, chemicals, and
pharmaceuticals being major contributors. The services sector, including IT, banking, and
tourism, is the largest contributor to the Indian economy, accounting for around 53% of
GDP.

In recent years, the Indian economy has witnessed robust growth, averaging over 7%
annually in the past decade. However, the country faces several challenges which include
high levels of poverty and inequality, inadequate infrastructure, and a large informal sector.
To address these challenges, the Indian government has implemented several economic
reforms which include opening up the economy to foreign investment, reducing subsidies,
and introducing a goods and services tax (GST). These reforms have helped improve the
ease of doing business in the country and attract foreign investment.

34
The Indian economy has also undergone significant transformation in the past few years.
One of the most notable developments has been the rise of the digital economy. The Indian
government has launched several initiatives to promote digitalization, including the Digital
India campaign, which aims to provide digital infrastructure to all citizens, and the Make in
India campaign, which aims to promote local manufacturing and entrepreneurship. The
growth of the digital economy has also led to the emergence of new business models, such
as e-commerce and fin-tech.

Another significant development in the Indian economy has been the rise of the middle
class. The growth of the middle class has led to increased consumption and demand for
goods and services, which has in turn boosted economic growth. The middle class has also
been a driving force behind the growth of the service sector, particularly in areas such as
healthcare, education, and entertainment.

In conclusion, the Indian economy has come a long way since its independence in 1947. It
has witnessed significant growth, diversification, and transformation in recent years. The
growth of the digital economy, the rise of the middle class, and the government’s economic
reforms has been major contributors to this growth. However, the country still faces several
challenges, including unemployment, income inequality, and inadequate infrastructure.
Addressing these challenges will require sustained efforts from the government and the
private sector. Despite these challenges, the Indian economy has immense potential for
growth and development, and the government continues to focus on implementing policies
and initiatives to drive economic growth and improve the standard of living of its citizens.

4.2 IMPORTANCE OF FDI IN THE INDIAN ECONOMY

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has played a significant role in the economic development
of India. Here are some of the reasons why FDI is important for the Indian economy:

 Capital Inflows: FDI brings in capital inflows that can be used to finance new
projects, expand existing businesses, and develop infrastructure. This helps to boost
economic growth and creates employment opportunities.

35
  Technology Transfer: FDI also brings new technologies, management practices,
and skills that can be beneficial to the host country. This helps to enhance the
competitiveness of local firms and promote innovation.
 Increase in exports: FDI also helps to increase exports by providing access to new
markets and improving production processes. This helps to boost the foreign
exchange reserves and balance of payments.
 Development of infrastructure: FDI can contribute to the development of
infrastructure in the host country, such as roads, ports, and power plants. This can
improve the overall business environment and attract more foreign investment.
 Promote Domestic Industry: FDI can help to promote the domestic industry by
increasing competition, which can lead to better quality products and lower prices
for consumers.
 Generate Employment Opportunities: FDI can create employment opportunities
in the host country. This can lead to the development of a skilled workforce and
contribute to the overall economic growth of the country.

Overall, FDI is an important driver of economic growth and development in India. It helps
to attract capital, technology, and expertise, which can help to improve the competitiveness
of the Indian economy and create employment opportunities for the local population.

4.3 TRENDS OF FDI INFLOWS IN INDIA

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is an investment made by a foreign company or individual

into another country's business or economy. In India, FDI inflows have been an important
source of capital for the country's economic growth and development.

FDI inflows to India have been on an upward trend in recent years. According to the
Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), FDI inflows to India
increased from USD 44.4 billion in 2016-17 to USD 81.7 billion in 2020-21. This
significant increase in FDI inflows can be attributed to a variety of factors, such as India's
large and growing market, its skilled workforce, and the country's ongoing economic
reforms.

36
 Fig. FDI flows in India

In terms of sector-wise distribution, the services sector has been the top recipient of FDI
inflows in India. Other top sectors include computer software and hardware,
telecommunications, trading, and automobile. The services sector is India's largest sector
and accounts for about 55% of the country's GDP. The sector includes a wide range of
industries, such as financial services, IT and IT-enabled services, tourism, and healthcare.
The high level of FDI inflows to the services sector is an indication of the sector's
importance to the Indian economy and its growth potential.

Another significant factor contributing to the rise in FDI inflows to India is the country's
liberalized FDI policy. The Indian government has made several policy changes to attract
FDI inflows, such as liberalizing FDI norms in various sectors, simplifying procedures, and
introducing schemes such as the Make in India program. In 2020, the government also
announced further liberalization of FDI norms in sectors such as defense, civil aviation, and
insurance. These policy changes have made it easier for foreign companies to invest in
India and have contributed to the country's growing attractiveness as a destination for FDI.

37
 Fig. Sectors attracting highest FDI

Singapore has been the largest source of FDI to India in recent years. In 2020-21, FDI
inflows from Singapore were valued at USD 17.7 billion, followed by Mauritius (USD 13.7
billion), the Netherlands (USD 12.9 billion), the United States (USD 8.3 billion), and Japan
(USD 4.6 billion). These countries have significant investments in various sectors such as
IT, pharmaceuticals, renewable energy, and automobiles.

FDI inflows have had a positive impact on the Indian economy, contributing to economic
growth and employment. FDI inflows have led to the development of infrastructure,
technology transfer, and the overall competitiveness of the Indian economy. FDI inflows
have also contributed to the creation of new jobs in various sectors, particularly in
manufacturing and services. For example, foreign companies such as Samsung, LG, and
Foxconn have set up manufacturing facilities in India, creating jobs and contributing to the
development of the country's manufacturing sector.

38
However, FDI inflows also have their challenges. One challenge is the potential for FDI to
crowd out domestic investments. Domestic companies may find it difficult to compete with
foreign companies that have access to larger amounts of capital and advanced technology.
Another challenge is the potential for FDI to have negative environmental and social
impacts, particularly in industries such as mining and energy. The Indian government has
taken steps to address these challenges, such as introducing regulations to limit the impact
of mining and other extractive industries on the environment.

In conclusion, FDI inflows have been an important source of capital for India's economic
growth and development. The country has seen a significant increase in FDI inflows in
recent years, particularly in the services sector.

4.4 STATE-WISE DISTRIBUTION OF FDI WITHIN INDIA

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is an important driver of economic growth and

development in India. In recent years, the Indian government has taken several measures to
improve the ease of doing business in the country and attract more FDI. The state-wise
distribution of FDI in India is discussed below:

 Maharashtra: Maharashtra is the top recipient of FDI in India, with a total inflow
of USD 13.6 billion in the financial year 2020-21. Mumbai, the state capital, is
India's financial hub and attracts significant investments in the financial and
services sectors. Other major cities in Maharashtra, such as Pune and Nashik, are
also emerging as attractive destinations for FDI, particularly in the automobile and
manufacturing sectors.
 Karnataka: Karnataka is the second-largest recipient of FDI in India, with a total
inflow of USD 5.5 billion in the financial year 2020-21. Bangalore, the state capital,
is the technology hub of India and attracts significant investments in the information
technology and biotechnology sectors. Other cities in Karnataka, such as Mysore
and Mangalore, are also emerging as attractive destinations for FDI, particularly in
the automobile and aerospace sectors.

39
 Delhi: Delhi is the third-largest recipient of FDI in India, with a total inflow of
USD 4.1 billion in the financial year 2020-21. The national capital region of Delhi
attracts significant investments in the services and manufacturing sectors,
particularly in the hospitality and tourism industries. Other cities in Delhi, such as
Ghaziabad and Noida, are also emerging as attractive destinations for FDI,
particularly in the real estate and infrastructure sectors.
 Gujarat: Gujarat is the fourth-largest recipient of FDI in India, with a total inflow
of USD 3.3 billion in the financial year 2020-21. Ahmedabad, the state capital, is a
major industrial center and attracts significant investments in the manufacturing and
services sectors. Other cities in Gujarat, such as Vadodara and Surat, are also
emerging as attractive destinations for FDI, particularly in the textiles and diamond
industries.
 Tamil Nadu: Tamil Nadu is the fifth-largest recipient of FDI in India, with a total
inflow of USD 3.2 billion in the financial year 2020-21. Chennai, the state capital,
is a major manufacturing hub and attracts significant investments in the automobile
and electronics sectors. Other cities in Tamil Nadu, such as Coimbatore and
Madurai, are also emerging as attractive destinations for FDI, particularly in the
textiles and IT industries.
 Uttar Pradesh: Uttar Pradesh is the sixth-largest recipient of FDI in India, with a
total inflow of USD 2.7 billion in the financial year 2020-21. Lucknow, the state
capital, attracts significant investments in the services and manufacturing sectors.
Other cities in Uttar Pradesh, such as Noida and Ghaziabad, are also emerging as
attractive destinations for FDI, particularly in the real estate and infrastructure
sectors.
 Haryana: Haryana is the seventh-largest recipient of FDI in India, with a total
inflow of USD 2.6 billion in the financial year 2020-21. Gurgaon, a major city in
the state, is a major IT hub and attracts significant investments in the information
technology and services sectors. Other cities in Haryana, such as Faridabad and
Panipat, are also emerging as attractive destinations for FDI, particularly in the
textiles and manufacturing industries.

40
In conclusion, the state-wise distribution of FDI in India varies significantly, with
Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Delhi being the top recipients of FDI. These states have
established infrastructure, skilled workforce, and a favorable business environment, which
make them attractive destinations for foreign investors. Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh,
and Haryana are also emerging as popular destinations for FDI, with their strategic location,
abundant resources, and growth potential.

It is worth noting that the Indian government has been taking steps to promote FDI in all
states of the country. The government's Make in India campaign aims to encourage foreign
investors to set up manufacturing units in India and boost the country's manufacturing
sector. In addition, various state governments have been offering incentives and tax breaks
to attract foreign investors to their respective states.

Overall, the state-wise distribution of FDI in India reflects the country's growing
importance as a global investment destination. With its large and growing market, skilled
workforce, and supportive government policies, India offers attractive opportunities for
foreign investors across all states of the country.

4.5 SECTOR-WISE DISTRIBUTION OF FDI IN INDIA

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is an important source of economic growth and

development for India. In recent years, the Indian government has taken several measures
to improve the ease of doing business in the country and attract more FDI. The sector-wise
distribution of FDI in India has been discussed below:

 Service Sector: The services sector is the largest recipient of FDI in India,
accounting for 43% of the total FDI inflows in the financial year 2020-21. Within
the services sector, the IT & ITeS (Information Technology and IT-enabled
Services) industry is the largest recipient of FDI, followed by the
telecommunications, hospitality and tourism, and financial services industries.
 Computer Software & Hardware: The computer software and hardware industry
is the second-largest recipient of FDI in India, accounting for 20% of the total FDI

41
 inflows in the financial year 2020-21. This sector is driven by India's competitive
advantage in software development and IT-enabled services and is likely to
continue to attract significant FDI in the coming years.
 Telecommunications: The telecommunications sector is the third-largest recipient
of FDI in India, accounting for 7% of the total FDI inflows in the financial year
2020-21. With India being the world's second-largest telecommunications market,
the sector is a key growth driver for the Indian economy and continues to attract
significant FDI.
 Automobiles: The automobile industry is the fourth-largest recipient of FDI in
India, accounting for 6% of the total FDI inflows in the financial year 2020-21.
India is emerging as a major hub for automobile manufacturing, with several global
auto manufacturers setting up operations in the country. The Indian government's
focus on electric vehicles and sustainable mobility is likely to further drive
investments in this sector.
 Pharmaceuticals: The pharmaceutical industry is the fifth-largest recipient of FDI
in India, accounting for 5% of the total FDI inflows in the financial year 2020-21.
India is a major supplier of generic medicines to the world, and the sector is likely
to continue to attract significant investments in the coming years.
 Trading: The trading sector is the sixth-largest recipient of FDI in India,
accounting for 3% of the total FDI inflows in the financial year 2020-21. This sector
includes wholesale and retail trading and is driven by India's large and growing
consumer market.
 Construction: The construction industry is the seventh-largest recipient of FDI in
India, accounting for 3% of the total FDI inflows in the financial year 2020-21.
India's rapidly expanding infrastructure and real estate sectors are driving
investments in this sector.
 Chemicals: The chemicals industry is the eighth-largest recipient of FDI in India,
accounting for 2% of the total FDI inflows in the financial year 2020-21. India is a
major producer of chemicals and petrochemicals, and the sector is likely to attract
further investments in the coming years.

42
  Power: The power industry is the ninth-largest recipient of FDI in India, accounting
for 1% of the total FDI inflows in the financial year 2020-21. India's growing
energy demand and focus on renewable energy are driving investments in this
sector.
 Others: The remaining sectors, including food processing, textiles, and
metallurgical industries, account for the remaining 10% of the total FDI inflows in
the financial year 2020-21.

In conclusion, the sector-wise distribution of FDI in India reflects the country's strengths
and potential as a global investment destination. The services sector, computer software
and hardware, telecommunications, automobiles, pharmaceuticals, trading, construction,
chemicals, power, and other sectors all offer attractive opportunities for foreign investors
looking to tap into India's large and growing market, competitive advantages, and
supportive government policies.

It is worth noting that the Indian government has been taking steps to further improve the
ease of doing business in India and attract more FDI in various sectors. The government's
production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme, for example, offers incentives to companies that
invest in certain priority sectors such as electronics manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and
automobiles. Additionally, the government has been working to improve infrastructure,
streamline regulations, and reduce bureaucracy to make India a more attractive destination
for foreign investors.

Overall, the sector-wise distribution of FDI in India reflects the country's diversified
economy, with multiple sectors offering significant opportunities for foreign investors. As
India continues to grow and develop, FDI inflows will likely increase across all sectors,
making India an even more attractive destination for global investors.

4.6 CHALLENGES IN THE INFLOW OF FDI

India has emerged as one of the fastest-growing economies in the world, and Foreign
Direct Investment (FDI) plays a vital role in its growth and development. FDI is an
important
43
source of capital for the country, and it can bring in new technologies, improve
infrastructure, increase employment opportunities, and promote exports. However, several
challenges to the inflow of FDI in India need to be addressed to attract more foreign
investors.

 Infrastructure
One of the biggest challenges to the inflow of FDI in India is inadequate
infrastructure. India's infrastructure, including transportation, energy, and
communication networks, is not developed enough to meet the requirements of
foreign investors. Poor infrastructure can make it difficult for foreign investors to
establish and operate their businesses in India. For example, inadequate
transportation infrastructure can result in delays in the movement of goods, which
can increase the cost of doing business. Similarly, unreliable energy and
communication networks can hamper the efficient functioning of businesses. India
needs to invest more in infrastructure development to attract more FDI.
 Bureaucracy
India's bureaucratic processes are often slow and complex, which can lead to delays
in project implementation and approvals. This can discourage foreign investors who
may find it difficult to navigate through the bureaucratic hurdles and get necessary
approvals on time. India needs to streamline its bureaucratic processes and make
them more efficient to attract more FDI.
 Legal and regulatory framework
India has complex and often ambiguous legal and regulatory frameworks that can
create uncertainty for foreign investors. Different regulations and policies across
different states can further add to the complexity and ambiguity. This can make it
difficult for foreign investors to understand and comply with the regulatory
requirements. India needs to simplify its legal and regulatory frameworks and make
them more transparent to attract more FDI.

44
  Labor laws

India's labor laws are often perceived as rigid, making it difficult for companies to
lay off workers or to make changes to their employment contracts. This can increase
the cost of doing business and discourage foreign investors who may prefer more
flexible labor laws. India needs to reform its labor laws and make them more
flexible to attract more FDI.
 Corruption
Corruption is another major challenge to the inflow of FDI in India. Corruption can
create a negative perception of the country, and discourage foreign investors who
may be concerned about the risks of investing in a corrupt environment. India needs
to take more stringent measures to combat corruption and improve its ranking in the
corruption perception index to attract more FDI.
 Taxation
India's taxation system is complex and can be challenging for foreign investors to
navigate. Different tax rates across different states can add to the complexity,
making it difficult for foreign investors to plan and execute their investments. India
needs to simplify its taxation system and make it more transparent to attract more
FDI.
 Currency fluctuation
Fluctuations in the value of the Indian currency can pose a risk to foreign investors.
A volatile currency can affect the profitability of foreign investments, making it
difficult for investors to predict their returns. India needs to take measures to
stabilize its currency and reduce volatility to attract more FDI.
 Political instability
Political instability can create uncertainty and pose a risk to foreign investments.
India has a democratic political system, and political changes can result in changes
in policies, which can create uncertainty for foreign investors. India needs to ensure
political stability and provide a predictable policy environment to attract more FDI.

In conclusion, India has made significant progress in attracting FDI in recent years, but
45
there are still several challenges that need to be addressed to enhance the inflow of FDI into

46
the country. Addressing these challenges, including infrastructure, bureaucracy, legal and
regulatory framework, labor laws, corruption, taxation, currency fluctuation, and political
stability, will be critical to attracting more FDI and leveraging the benefits that FDI can
bring to India's economy, including job creation, technology transfer, and overall economic
growth. The Indian government has recognized these challenges and has taken several
initiatives to address them, such as the Make in India campaign, which aims to improve the
ease of doing business in the country and encourage more foreign investment. The
government has also initiated several measures to improve infrastructure, simplify
regulations, and reduce corruption. However, more needs to be done to address these
challenges, and India needs to create a more conducive environment for foreign investors to
attract more FDI and achieve sustainable economic growth.

4.7 IMPACT OF FDI ON THE INDIAN ECONOMY

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) plays a significant role in the growth and development of
the Indian economy. India has been actively seeking FDI in recent years, and the impact of
FDI on the Indian economy has been substantial. The impact of FDI on the Indian economy
has been discussed below:

 Increased employment opportunities

FDI has led to the creation of several employment opportunities in India. According
to the latest data, FDI has created over 10 million jobs in India, making it one of the
major contributors to employment generation in the country. FDI has contributed to
the growth of several industries such as information technology, manufacturing, and
service sectors, which have created several direct and indirect employment
opportunities.
 Technology transfer
FDI has brought new technologies and managerial practices to India. This has led to
an improvement in the quality of products and services offered by Indian companies.
FDI has also led to the transfer of knowledge and expertise, which has improved the
skills of Indian workers. The latest data shows that FDI has contributed significantly

47
 to the growth of research and development activities in India, which has further
boosted innovation and technological advancement.
 Increase in exports
FDI has led to an increase in exports from India. Foreign investors have established
their production units in India, which has led to the growth of the manufacturing
sector in the country. This has resulted in an increase in the production of goods,
which has further boosted exports. The latest data shows that FDI has contributed
significantly to the growth of the export sector in India.
 Boost to GDP growth
FDI has played a significant role in boosting the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
growth of India. According to the latest data, FDI has contributed about 2% to the
GDP growth of India. FDI has helped in the expansion of several industries, which
has led to the overall growth of the economy.
 Infusion of capital
FDI has brought significant amounts of capital to India. This has helped in the
expansion of several industries, which has led to the creation of new businesses and
the expansion of existing ones. FDI has also led to the development of infrastructure
in India, which has further boosted economic growth.
 Improvement in Balance of Payments
FDI has contributed significantly to the improvement of the balance of payments in
India. The inflow of foreign currency through FDI has helped in stabilizing the
rupee and has helped in maintaining a favorable balance of payments. The latest
data shows that FDI has contributed significantly to the improvement of the balance
of payments in India.

In conclusion, FDI has had a significant impact on the Indian economy as per the latest data
available. It has led to the creation of several employment opportunities, the transfer of new
technologies, the growth of the export sector, the boost to GDP growth, the infusion of
capital, and the improvement of the balance of payments. FDI has played a critical role in
the growth and development of the Indian economy, and the Indian government needs to

48
continue to encourage foreign investors to invest in India to leverage the benefits that FDI
can bring to the country.

4.8 FINDINGS

The study found that one of the main challenges posed by FDI in India is the potential for
capital flight. This is a situation where foreign investors repatriate their profits and capital
back to their home country, leading to a reduction in the availability of capital for
investment in the domestic economy. This can be particularly damaging for emerging
economies like India, where there is a need for significant investment in infrastructure,
education, and other sectors to sustain economic growth. The study recommends that the
Indian government should monitor FDI inflows and outflows carefully and implement
policies to encourage long-term investment by foreign investors in the Indian economy.

Another challenge highlighted by the study is the potential for FDI to distort domestic
markets and create unfair competition. This is a concern in sectors such as retail and e-
commerce, where foreign investors may have access to greater resources and technology
than domestic players, leading to a concentration of market power. The study recommends
that the Indian government should ensure that FDI policies promote fair competition and
protect the interests of domestic players.

On the other hand, the study found that FDI has had a significant positive impact on the
Indian economy in several ways.

Firstly, FDI has contributed to job creation and improved livelihoods for many Indians. The
study notes that FDI in sectors such as manufacturing, IT, and services has led to the
creation of significant employment opportunities, particularly in urban areas. This has
helped to reduce poverty and improve living standards for many Indians.

49
Secondly, FDI has helped to boost exports and enhance India's global competitiveness. The
study notes that foreign investors have brought in the capital, technology, and managerial
expertise that have helped to enhance the productivity and competitiveness of Indian firms.
This has enabled Indian companies to improve their quality standards, expand their product
range, and access new markets, leading to a significant increase in exports.

Thirdly, FDI has helped to drive innovation and technology transfer in the Indian economy.
The study notes that foreign investors have brought in new technologies, best practices, and
management techniques that have helped to enhance the quality and productivity of Indian
firms. This has enabled Indian companies to improve their competitiveness and access new
markets, leading to a significant increase in exports.

Finally, the study found that FDI has helped to attract other forms of investment to the
Indian economy. The study notes that FDI inflows have played an important role in
attracting other forms of investment, including portfolio investment and foreign
institutional investment, to the Indian economy. This has helped to deepen capital markets
and enhance the availability of capital for investment in the Indian economy.

In conclusion, the study highlights both the challenges and the impact of FDI on the Indian
economy. While FDI can pose certain challenges, such as the potential for capital flight and
unfair competition, it has also had a significant positive impact on the Indian economy,
including job creation, export growth, innovation, and technology transfer. The study
recommends that the Indian government should continue to attract FDI while carefully
monitoring its impact and implementing policies to address any potential challenges. This
will enable India to harness the benefits of FDI and drive sustainable economic growth and
development in the years to come.

50
 CHAPTER – 5

SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION

5.1 SUGGESTIONS

Based on the findings of the study on the challenges and impact of FDI in India, the
following suggestions can be made to help address some of the challenges and maximize
the benefits of FDI in India:

 Encourage long-term investment: To address the potential for capital flight, the
Indian government should encourage long-term investment by foreign investors in
the Indian economy. This can be done by implementing policies that incentivize
foreign investors to invest for the long term, such as tax breaks and investment
protection.
 Promote fair competition: To address the potential for FDI to distort domestic
markets and create unfair competition, the Indian government should ensure that
FDI policies promote fair competition and protect the interests of domestic players.
This can be done by implementing policies that prevent monopolies and promote a
level playing field for all players.
 Focus on skill development: To maximize the benefits of FDI in terms of job
creation and improved livelihoods, the Indian government should focus on skill
development and education. This can be done by implementing policies that promote
training and skill development for Indian workers to help them take advantage of the
job opportunities created by FDI.
 Promote technology transfer: To maximize the benefits of FDI in terms of
innovation and technology transfer, the Indian government should encourage foreign
investors to transfer technology to Indian firms. This can be done by implementing
policies that require foreign investors to share their technology with Indian firms and

51
 providing incentives for technology transfer.
 Streamline regulatory processes: To attract more FDI to India, the government
should streamline regulatory processes and reduce bureaucracy. This can be done by
implementing policies that simplify procedures for setting up businesses and
obtaining permits, licenses, and approvals.
 Improve infrastructure: To support the growth of FDI in India, the government
should invest in infrastructure development. This can be done by implementing
policies that promote investment in infrastructure, such as highways, airports, and
ports, to improve connectivity and logistics.
 Enhance transparency: To build investor confidence and attract more FDI to India,
the government should enhance transparency in the FDI process. This can be done
by implementing policies that ensure transparency in decision-making, provide clear
guidelines for foreign investors, and offer a predictable and stable investment environment.

In conclusion, while FDI in India poses certain challenges, it also offers significant
opportunities for economic growth and development. By addressing the challenges and
maximizing the benefits of FDI, India can attract more foreign investment and achieve
sustainable economic growth in the years to come.

5.2 CONCLUSION

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has been an important driver of economic growth in India
over the past few decades. FDI has brought in capital, technology, and management
practices from overseas, leading to significant improvements in productivity and
competitiveness in various sectors. However, the challenges posed by FDI cannot be
ignored. It is essential to understand the impact of FDI on the Indian economy and the
challenges that come with it to ensure that India can maximize its benefits while addressing
its challenges.

In conclusion, the study has highlighted that Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) can bring
about numerous benefits to the Indian economy, including increased employment
opportunities, technological advancement, and overall economic growth. However, there
are also a number of challenges that come with FDI, such as the potential for capital flight,
52
unfair competition, and negative impacts on the environment and social welfare.

To maximize the benefits of FDI while addressing these challenges, it is important for the
Indian government to implement policies that promote long-term investment, fair
competition, skill development, technology transfer, streamlined regulatory processes,
improved infrastructure, and enhanced transparency.

By doing so, India can create a conducive environment for foreign investors and attract
more FDI, which will help drive economic growth, create more jobs, and improve living
standards for its citizens. However, it is also important to note that FDI is not a silver bullet
and should be viewed as just one tool among many in the pursuit of economic
development. As such, it is essential for the Indian government to pursue a balanced
approach that takes into account the unique needs and challenges of its economy.

53
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Srivastava P. (2021), “Foreign Direct Investment in India Determinants and Its

Impact”, http://hdl.handle.net/10603/345549.

Narang V. (2019), “Foreign Direct Investment Inflows and its Impact on Various
Micro Economics Dimensions A Comparative Study of India and China”,
http://hdl.handle.net/10603/395775.

Bajpai, Rakesh R. (2016), “Study of FDI and Indian economy issues and
challenges”, http://hdl.handle.net/10603/308546.

Agarwal, RN. (2001), “Foreign Portfolio Investment in Some Developing Countries: A

Study of Determinants and Macro Economic Impact”, Indian Economic Review, Vol.
33, No.2, PP. 217-229.

Agrawal, P. (2000), “Economic Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in South

Asia”, rru.worldbank.org/Documents/PapersLinks/1111.

Albijazi, Yahya ZD (1999): “Developing Countries and Foreign Direct Investment”,

digitool.library.megill.ca.8881/dtl_publish/7/21670.htm.

Athrey S. and Kapur, S. (2001), “Private Investment in India: Pain or Panacea?”,

The World Economy, Vol. 24, No. 3.

Athukorala, P. and Sen, K. (1995), “Reforms and Investment in India”,

http://www.ideas.org/p/wop/anuetd/9606htmI-7k.

Bajpai Nirupam and Jeffrey D. Sachs. (2006), Foreign Direct Investment in India:
Issues and Problems, Harvard Institute of International Development, Development
Discussion, Paper No. 759.

Banga, R. (2003), “Impact of Government Policies and Investment Agreements on

FDI Inflows to Developing Countries”, Working Paper No. 116, Indian Council for
Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi.

54
Bartlett, D. (2008), “Economic Trends in the BRIC Countries”, http://www.
thefinancedirector.com/features/feature.

Basu P., Nayak N.C, Archana., (2007), Foreign Direct Investment in India,
emerging horizon, Indian economic review, 42 (2), PP 255-266.

Belem lliana Vasquez Galan (2006): “The effect of Trade Liberalization and
Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico”, etheses.bham.ac.uk/89/1
/vasquezgalan06phd.pdf.

Bhagwati JN. (1978), “Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regime”,

Vol 1, Studies in Tnternational economies Relations No.10, New York, ideas-
repec.org/b/nbr/nberbk/bhag78-1 html.

Caves, R. (1996). “Multinational Enterprises and Economic Analysis”, Cambridge,

MA: Cambridge Univ. Press, PP. 221-227 (2nd ed.).

Dr. Shriprakash (2006),” Indput-Output Modelling of Impact of FDI on Indian

Economic Growth”.

Economic Survey, (1992-93): Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New

Delhi.

Economic Survey, (2000 to 2015), Government of India, Ministry of Finance,

Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

Ernst and Young Survey Report (2015).

Gastanaga, V. M.; Nugent, 1.B. and Pashmova, B. (1998), “Host Country Reforms
and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows; How much Difference do they Make?”,
World Development, Vol. 26, No.7.

Gazioglou S. and Mc Causland W.D. (1999): “An International Economic Analysis of

FDI and International Indebtedness”, Indian Economic Journal, Vol. 48, No. 4

55
Ghosh D.N. (2005): “FDI and Reform: Significance and Relevance of Chinese
Experience”, Economic and political Weekly, pp. 5388-5391.

Ghoshal, M.K. (1990), “Foreign Investment in India-Policy Lessons and Prospects”,

Yojana, Vol. 34, No. 8, PP. 17-19.

Goldman Sachs Survey Report (2014), www.goldmansachs.com.

Goldman Sachs (2007): Global Economic Papers No.99, www.goldmansachs.com.

Gregorio, 1D. and Lee, J.W. (2002), “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affet
Growth”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 45, No.1, PP115-135.

Gujrati, G., (2004), “Basic Econometrics”, MC Graw Hill, New York, PP. 526-529,
(4th ed.)

Gupta, K.R. (2006), “Indian Economy its Growing Dimensions”, Liberalisation and
Globalisation of Indian Economy, edited by Dhar, P.K. Atlantic Publication New
Delhi, PP 312-318, 3rd ed.)

Guruswamy Mohan, Sharma Kamal, Mohanty Jeevan Prakash, Korah Thomas J.

(2005), “FDI in Tndia’s Retail Sector: More Bad than Good?”, Economic and
Political Weekly, pp.619-623.

Handbook of Industrial Policy and Statistics (2014-15), Government of India.

Handbook of Statistics of Indian Economy, (2000-2015), Reserve Bank of India

www.accman.in

www.borjournals.com

www.investopedia.com

www.caionline.in

www.coursehero.com

56
www.shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in

www.isca.in

www.skoch.org

www.ripublication.com

www.nationmultimedia.com

www.slideshare.net

www.nittkar.ac.in

www.wto.org

www.worldbank.org

www.wikipedia.com

www.cidc.com

www.datagov.in

www.dipp.nic.in

www.chinadaily.com

www.ey.com

www.eximbank.com

www.etheses.bham.ac.uk

www.finmin.nic.in

www.ifc.org

www.ijmrr.com

57
www.icehm.org

www.ipublishing.co.in

58