Trash Everywhere, Water Nowhere:
Improving Waste Management and Sanitary
Water Supply in Barangay Dalahican
In partial fulfillment of the Requirements of Subject
Leadership and Decision Making
Presented By:
Aguallo, Allysa Marie
Canaria, Zaira Kaye
Dador, Marielle
Docor, Bryant
Edra, Joanna Rei
Javier, Cyrene
Lusterio, Rhona
Pelaez, Sharmaine
Prago, Lorens
Sagetarios, Zhay
Yamugan, Jerzel
Presented to:
Mr. Raul F. Marquez, RF, LPT, DPA
Case Trash Everywhere, Water Nowhere: Improving Waste
Management and Sanitary Water Supply in Barangay
Dalahican
Viewpoint Group 4 members: AGUALLO, CANARIA, DADOR,
DOCOR, EDRA, JAVIER, LUSTERIO, PELAEZ, PRAGO,
SAGETARIOS, YAMUGAN
Time Context Now
Problem Barangay Dalahican suffer from improper waste
Statement management and limited access to clean water that can
lead to different health issues.
Statement of To give solution to such issues to prevent spreading of
Objective bacteria and viruses that causes health issues in
Barangay Dalahican.
Areas of STRENGTH:
Consideration 1. Presence of health facilities or barangay health
workers
2. Barangay officials and community leaders are
supportive and willing to implement health and
sanitation programs.
3. Use of Available resources
4. Regular Quality Monitoring
5. Community Engagement and Education
WEAKNESS:
•Lack of proper waste segregation and disposal
facilities
•Low public awareness and involvement in waste and
water issues
•Insufficient infrastructure for water treatment and
distribution
•Weak enforcement of environmental laws and policies
OPPORTUNITIES:
1. Possible Partnership with NGO
2. Creation of Jobs
3. Improve public health and environmental quality
4. Turning waste into income
5. Governments programs and funding initiatives for
water and sanitation
THREATS:
• Environmental problems such as trash blocking the
drainage system can lead to flooding and dirty
surroundings.
• Spread of diseases from stagnant, dirty water and
uncollected garbage can cause various illnesses like
diarrhea, dengue, and leptospirosis.
• Higher health expenses when many people get sick,
families and the government may spend more money
on medicine and hospital care.
• Lack of community support and cooperation—
residents not following proper waste and hygiene
practices can lead to difficulty in solving the problem.
Assumptions IMPROPER WASTE DISPOSAL
1. Residents lack of awareness of proper waste
disposal method due to limited health education
program.
2. Lack of waste management ordinances
implementation in barangay due to limited budget and
resources, and poor community participation.
LIMITED ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER
1. Government or local authorities have not prioritized
or invested adequately in clean water initiatives due to
budgetary or logistical challenges.
2. Infrastructure for clean water distribution (e.g., piped
system) is underdeveloped or absent, leading to
limited access.
Alternative IMPROPER WASTE DISPOSAL
course of action ACA 1 – Community-Based Waste Segregation
Program
Description: This program encourages residents to properly
separate biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste at
the barangay level to reduce health hazards caused by
improper disposal.
ACA 2 – Establish a Barangay Recycling Facility
Description: Setting up a local recycling center promotes
sustainable waste management and reduces
environmental pollution that negatively impacts community
health.
ACA 3 - Educational Campaigns and Eco-Seminars
Description: Conducting regular awareness drives and
seminars educates residents on proper sanitation practices
and the health risks associated with poor waste
management.
ACA 4 – Garbage Bin Deployment all over the Barangay
Description: Strategically placing garbage bins ensures
proper waste disposal and minimizes the spread of
diseases caused by exposed and scattered trash.
ACA 5 - Strict Implementation of Waste Management
Ordinances
Description: Enforcing local waste regulations with
penalties ensures compliance, leading to a cleaner
environment and better public health outcomes.
LIMITED ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER
ACA 1 – Community Education and Awareness
Program
Description: Educating residents about safe water practices
and hygiene empowers them to make informed decisions
that prevent waterborne diseases.
ACA 2 – Improving Water Treatment Facilities.
Description: Upgrading existing water treatment systems
ensures a safer and more reliable water supply, reducing
the risk of illness from contaminated water.
ACA 3- Have a water distribution points in the area
Description: Establishing accessible water distribution
stations helps ensure equitable access to clean water for
all residents, promoting better hygiene and health.
ACA 4- Use rainwater harvesting to store water for the
community.
Description: Collecting and storing rainwater offers an eco-
friendly and supplementary water source that can improve
water availability during shortages.
ACA 5- Installation of Community-Based Water
Filtration Systems
Description: Installing localized water filtration systems
provides residents with immediate access to clean drinking
water, safeguarding against waterborne illnesses.
IMPROPER WASTE DISPOSAL
ADVANTAGE DISADVANTAGE
ACA 1 Promotes recycling and Requires sustained public
composting. Empowers education and
community involvement. participation.
ACA 2 Generates income and job Needs initial funding and
opportunities and reduces space. Requires regular
environmental pollution. maintenance and trained
personnel.
ACA 3 Builds long-term Results may take time.
awareness and behavior Participation may be
change. Inexpensive and limited without incentives.
scalable.
ACA 4 Distribution of garbage bin Bins may overflow or get
will help to collect easily damaged if not regularly
the garbage. monitored and emptied.
ACA 5 Encourages discipline and May be seen as punitive
accountability. without proper awareness
campaigns.
LIMITED ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER
ADVANTAGE DISADVANTAGE
ACA 1 Promotes water-saving Language barriers,
practices like reusing especially with the Badjao
greywater, and improves community, may limit
hygiene through safe food understanding. Education
handling education— alone may be ineffective
helping prevent without supportive policies
waterborne illnesses. and committed local
leadership.
ACA 2 Access to clean water Potential for inconsistent
leads to improved hygiene water quality.
practices, further reducing
the spread of disease.
ACA 3 Several households can be In peak season or in big
provided with water from communities, the
one distribution point, distribution points are not
fostering fair access to enough to cater to the
water resources. demand.
ACA 4 Uses a renewable water Efficiency depends on
supply, minimizing the rainfall patterns, which may
reliance on central water be irregular.
systems.
ACA 5 Cost-effective and One system may only serve
accessible to multiple a small number of
households. households.
ANALYSIS:
INTERPRETATION:
2.34-3.00 = BEST
1.67-2.33= BETTER
1.00-1.66= GOOD
LEGEND:
TIMELINESS – The right timing and the most time saving to achieve
EFFECTIVENESS – The most effective way to achieve the planned objective
EFFICIENCY – The way to do things well, successfully and without waste.
IMPROPER WASTE DISPOSAL
CRITERIA ACA 1 ACA 2 ACA 3 ACA 4 ACA 5
TIMELINESS 2.45 2.09 2.54 2.09 2.09
EFFECTIVENESS 2.81 2.27 2.45 2.45 2.45
EFFICIENCY 2.36 1.90 2.36 2.27 2.27
TOTAL: 2.54 2.08 2.45 2.27 2.24
LIMITED ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER
CRITERIA ACA 1 ACA 2 ACA 3 ACA 4 ACA 5
TIMELINESS 2.63 2.27 2.36 2.36 2.27
EFFECTIVENESS 2.63 2.36 2.72 2.36 2.63
EFFIECIENCY 2.63 2.72 2.45 2.36 2.45
TOTAL: 2.63 2.45 2.51 2.36 2.45
CONCLUSION:
As the survey was made, ACA 1 or Community-Based Waste Segregation
has the highest average weighted mean with 2.54 points for the improper
waste segregation. This is the most favorable option. It ranked highest
specifically on effectiveness indicating it has the greatest potential for
immediate and impactful improvement in waste management practices.
And for the limited access to clean water, also ACA 1 or Community
Education and Awareness Program has the highest average weighted mean
with 2.63 points suggesting that it is the most efficient and timely approach
to addressing the water supply issue.
The data indicates that ACA 1 is the most viable course of action for both
issues, offering balanced advantages across all three criteria. It is therefore
recommended that this strategy be prioritized for implementation in order to
significantly improve health and sanitation conditions in the community.
PLAN OF ACTION:
IMPROPER WASTE DISPOSAL
ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE TIMEFRAME
Conduct a survey to Brgy. Health Workers 3 to 5 days
the different Purok in
the Barangay in terms
of waste habits
Official Creation of Brgy. Captain, 15 to 30 days
ordinance about the Sangguniang Barangay
program by the
barangay captain and
his sangguniang
barangay.
Resource Mobilization Barangay Treasurer, 7 to 14 days
and Budget Allocation NGO Partners, LGU
Support
Information drive (e., g. Brgy. Volunteers, Brgy. 2 days
leaflets, pamphlets, Health workers
posters)
Distribution of trash NGO partners, Brgy. 1 to 3 days
bins in different area Volunteers,
points in the Barangay Sagguniang Barangay
Partnership with junk Baranggay, 2 to 3 days
shops/recycles for Recyclers
recyclable materials
Composting Residents, agricultural 3 to 4 weeks
Workshops as soil office
enrichers
Reward households or Barangay Council, Ongoing
zones that show active NGO Partners
participation and
proper compliance.
Regular monitoring and Barangay Committee Monthly
feedback
Evaluation: Assess Barangay Committee Monthly
outcomes and integrate
long-term planning.
LIMITED ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER
ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE TIMEFRAME
Planning and Barangay leaders, Week 1
coordination of the Health workers,
Barangay with their Partners
partners to finalize the
program plan
Conduct monthly Barangay/City Health Monthly
community seminars Officer, Sanitation
on hygiene and disease Inspectors, NGO
prevention Representatives, Guest
Speakers
Create and distribute Barangay Health Month 1 to 2
brochures, posters, Workers, Youth
and flyers in local Volunteers, Barangay
dialect Officials
Broadcast hygiene tips Local Radio Weekly
via local radio and Announcers, Social
social media platforms Media Manager,
Barangay Information
Officer
Implement hygiene School Principals, Monthly
education activities in Science and Health
public schools Teachers, DepEd
Coordinators
Conduct door-to-door Barangay Health Weekly
information campaigns Workers, Trained Youth
and focus group Volunteers, Community
discussions Organizers
Host live Health Workers, Local Month 3 & 5
demonstrations on Engineers or Sanitation
water purification and Experts, NGO Trainers
sanitation practices
Conduct baseline and Program Monitoring Month 1 & 6
end line surveys, Team, Barangay Health
gather feedback, and Center Staff, Student
assess progress Interns (if any)
Recruit and train youth Sangguniang Kabataan Month 2 to 6
volunteers as hygiene (SK), Youth Leaders,
champions in the Volunteer Trainers
community
Recognize model Barangay Council, SK Month 5 & 6
households and Officials, School Heads,
schools practicing Program Coordinator
proper hygiene and
sanitation
