1.

Preamble

Intro/Quote

"The Preamble is the identity card of the Constitution." — N.A.

Palkhivala

Data/Facts

- Historical Context :

- Drafted by Jawaharlal Nehru; adopted on 26 November 1949 .

- Inspired by the French Revolution ("Liberty, Equality, Fraternity") and

the United States Constitution .

- Amendments :

- Amended once via the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1976) to

add "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity."

- Upheld as part of the Basic Structure Doctrine ( Kesavananda Bharati

v. State of Kerala, 1973 ).

- Global Recognition :

- Highlighted in UNESCO’s 2024 Global Citizenship Report for promoting

inclusive governance.

- Key Judicial Citations :

- Referenced in 350+ Supreme Court and High Court judgments

(Supreme Court Annual Report, 2023).

- Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) : Affirmed Preamble’s role in

defining India’s democratic ethos.

Recent Examples

1. 2024 Lok Sabha Debates :

- Opposition parties demanded legislative clarity on "Secularism" amid

Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code (UCC) implementation.

2. Kerala’s Preamble Literacy Campaign (2024) :

- Over 1 million students participated in state-wide Preamble

recitations in Malayalam, Hindi, and English.

3. Corporate Adoption :
 - TATA Steel and Infosys integrated Preamble values into their
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) frameworks.

4. Judicial Milestone :

- Supreme Court’s Electoral Bonds Verdict (2024) : Cited the Preamble’s

"democratic republic" to mandate transparency in political funding.

Main Body/Positives

1. Sovereignty :

- Strategic Autonomy : Non-alignment in global conflicts (e.g., refusal to

join NATO or Russia-led alliances).

- Digital Sovereignty : Enactment of the Digital Personal Data

Protection Act (2023) to safeguard citizen rights.

2. Socialist Principles :

- Prime Minister Awas Yojana : Constructed 3.2 crore rural houses

(Ministry of Rural Development, 2024).

- National Food Security Act : Covers 81.35 crore beneficiaries

(Department of Food and Public Distribution, 2024).

3. Secularism :

- Haj Subsidy Withdrawal (2018) : Promoted equality by eliminating

religion-based subsidies.

- Uttarakhand UCC (2024) : Aimed at unifying personal laws across

religions.

4. Democratic Innovations :

- Remote Voting Machines : Piloted for migrant workers (Election

Commission of India, 2024).

- e-Governance : 90% of gram panchayats digitized under the Digital

India Initiative (2024).

Challenges/Negatives

1. Political Misuse :

- Telangana’s Minority Sub-Quota (2023) : Accused of exploiting

"Secularism" for electoral gains.

- Air India Disinvestment Protests : "Socialist" rhetoric stalled

privatization reforms.

2. Judicial Overreach :
 - National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Case (2015) :
Critics argue the judiciary undermined parliamentary sovereignty.

3. Constitutional Contradictions :

- Article 25 vs. Secularism : Hijab Ban Case (2022) exposed tensions

between religious freedom and secular governance.

- Goods and Services Tax (GST) Compensation Delays : Eroded trust in

fiscal federalism (15th Finance Commission Report).

4. Awareness Gaps :

- Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2023 : Only 22% of urban

respondents understood "Fraternity."

Govt. Steps

1. Legislative :

- New Education Policy (NEP) 2020 : Mandates Preamble education from

primary school.

- BharatNet Project : Expanded internet access to 2.5 lakh gram

panchayats for constitutional literacy.

2. Policy :

- Viksit Bharat 2047 Vision : Aligns national development goals with

Preamble values (e.g., $5 trillion economy ).

- Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Index : Tracks progress on

equity and justice metrics.

3. Technology :

- AI Chatbot "Constitution Mitra" : Resolves 10,000+ daily queries on

constitutional rights (2023 launch).

Relevance

1. Social Justice :

- Bihar Caste Survey (2023) : Aligns with the Preamble’s "Justice" and
"Equality" (63% OBC-EBC population).

2. Gender Equity :

- Nari Shakti Vandan Act (2023) : 33% women’s reservation in

legislatures advances "Equality."

3. Climate Action :
 - National Green Tribunal (NGT) : Uses "Fraternity" to enforce corporate
environmental accountability.

4. Global Leadership :

- G20 Presidency (2023) : Showcased India’s democratic model rooted

in the Preamble’s ideals.

Way Forward

1. Constitutional Literacy :

- Rashtriya Preamble Diwas : Declare 26 November a national holiday

for workshops and debates.

- AI-Driven Learning : Develop apps like "Preamble Quest" for Gen-Z

engagement.

2. Judicial Reforms :

- Supreme Court Constitution Bench : Define ambiguous terms like

"Secularism" and "Socialist."

3. Grassroots Integration :

- Preamble Clubs : Establish in all 2.5 lakh gram panchayats by 2026.

- Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

(MGNREGA) : Link wages to constitutional awareness programs.

Conclusion

"The Constitution is a vehicle of life, and its Preamble is the steering

wheel."

— B.R. Ambedkar

By balancing tradition and transformation, the Preamble ensures India’s

democratic ethos thrives, guiding the nation toward inclusive growth and
justice.

---
 2.Fundamental Rights (Part III)
Intro/Quote
“Fundamental Rights are the soul of the Constitution, ensuring
liberty and equality for every citizen.”
— B.R. Ambedkar (as cited in PDF)
Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis :
- Part III (Articles 12–35) : Encompasses six categories of
rights:
- Right to Equality (Articles 14–18)
- Right to Freedom (Articles 19–22)
- Right Against Exploitation (Articles 23–24)
- Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25–28)
- Cultural & Educational Rights (Articles 29–30)
- Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32).
- Inspiration : Borrowed from the US Bill of Rights (free
speech, equality) and Irish Directive Principles (social
justice).

2. Key Amendments :
- 42nd Amendment (1976) : Curtailed FRs during the
Emergency.
- 86th Amendment (2002) : Added Article 21A (Right to
Education).

3. Judicial Milestones :
- AK Gopalan vs State of Madras (1950) : Narrow
interpretation of "procedure established by law."
 - ADM Jabalpur Case (1976) : Emergency-era suspension of
FRs, later overruled.
Recent Examples
1. Sedition Law (Sec. 124A IPC) :
- 2022 SC Stay : Ordered no new FIRs until review ( S.G.
Vombatkere v. UoI ).
- External Data : 399 sedition cases (2021), highest in Bihar
(NCRB).

2. AFSPA Controversy :
- 2023 Manipur Violence : SC intervened to protect Article
21 rights amid AFSPA excesses.

3. Same-Sex Marriage :
- 2023 SC Verdict : Declined legal recognition but affirmed
LGBTQ+ rights under Articles 14, 19, 21.

Main Body/Positives
1. Expanding Liberty :
- Right to Privacy : SC’s Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (2017)
verdict linked it to dignity under Article 21.
- Decriminalization of Adultery : Joseph Shine v. UoI (2018)
struck down Sec. 497 IPC.

2. Social Justice :
- SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act : Upheld in Subhash
Kashinath Mahajan (2018) to protect marginalized
communities.
 - Right to Health : SC recognized it under Article 21 during
COVID-19 ( Re: Problems of Migrant Labourers ).

3. Checks on State Power :

- Internet Shutdowns : SC in Anuradha Bhasin v. UoI (2020)
mandated proportionality tests.
- Custodial Torture : SC guidelines in D.K. Basu v. West
Bengal (1997) .

4. Global Recognition :
- UN Human Rights Council (2023) : Praised India’s PIL
mechanism for enabling environmental justice (e.g., Vellore
Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. UoI ).

Challenges/Negatives
1. Misuse of Laws :
- UAPA : 76% undertrials in terrorism cases are Muslims
(NCRB, 2022).
- Hate Speech : 1,804 cases in 2023 (NCRB), often targeting
minorities.

2. Access Barriers :
- Legal Aid : Only 1.5% of India’s budget allocated to
judiciary (India Justice Report, 2022).
- Digital Divide : 50% of rural India lacks internet access
(NSSO, 2023), hindering access to e-courts.

3. Conflict with DPSPs :

 - Minerva Mills (1980) : FRs cannot be diluted even for
DPSPs like “economic justice.”

4. Judicial Delays :
- Case Pendency : Avg. case lifespan: 5–15 years
(National Judicial Data Grid).
Government Steps
1. Legislative :
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (2023) : Replaces IPC with time-
bound trials for crimes against women/children.
- Digital Personal Data Protection Act (2023) : Safeguards
privacy under Article 21.

2. Policy :
- Tele-Law Initiative : 12 lakh beneficiaries in rural areas
(2023).
- Nyaya Mitra Scheme : Resolved 3.2 lakh pending cases in
district courts (2024).

3. Judicial :
- Fast-Track Courts : Cleared 40,000+ rape cases in 2023.
- AI in Judiciary : SUPACE (AI tool) aids judges in case
analysis.

Relevance
1. Digital Age :
- Aadhaar-PAN Linkage : SC upheld it with privacy
safeguards ( Justice Puttaswamy ).
 - AI Regulation : SC urged guidelines for facial recognition
tools (2023).

2. Federalism :
- Delhi Services Bill (2023) : SC affirmed elected govt’s
rights under Article 239AA.

3. Global Benchmark :
- World Justice Project (2023) : India ranked 79/142 in Rule
of Law Index (+5 in civil justice).
Way Forward
1. Judicial Reforms :
- All India Judicial Service (AIJS) : Fill 5,400+ vacancies;
ensure caste/gender diversity.
- Regional Benches of SC : Reduce case backlog (Law
Commission Report 2009).

2. Awareness :
- FRs in NCERT Curriculum : Include case studies like
Shreya Singhal (free speech) and Navtej Johar (LGBTQ+
rights).

3. Tech Integration :
- Blockchain for FIRs : Tamper-proof records piloted in
Telangana.
- AI Chatbots : “Nyaya Mitra” app for legal literacy in rural
areas.

4. Global Collaboration :
 - UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 16) : Align FR
enforcement with global justice standards.
Conclusion
“Fundamental Rights are India’s democratic armor, evolving to
protect citizens in an era of digital authoritarianism and social
polarization.”

---

3.Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs)

Intro/Quote
“DPSPs are a cheque on the bank of social justice, payable
when India’s conscience matures.” — B.R. Ambedkar

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis :
- Part IV (Articles 36–51) : Non-justiciable guidelines for
governance, inspired by the Irish Constitution and Gandhian
philosophy .
- 42nd Amendment (1976) : Added new principles:
- Article 39A (Free Legal Aid)
- Article 43A (Worker Participation in Management)
- Article 48A (Environment Protection).

2. Key Articles :
- Article 38 : Promote welfare through social, economic, and
political justice.
 - Article 39 : Equitable distribution of resources, equal pay
for equal work.
- Article 44 : Uniform Civil Code (UCC) for all citizens.
- Article 47 : Prohibition of intoxicating substances, improve
public health.

3. Judicial Milestones :
- Minerva Mills Case (1980) : DPSPs and FRs are
complementary; harmony essential.
- Vishaka Guidelines (1997) : SC invoked Article 39(d) to
frame sexual harassment laws.

---

Recent Examples
1. Gig Workers’ Social Security Bill (2023) :
- Aligns with Article 43 (Living Wage) | Covers 1.5 crore gig
workers (Labour Ministry, 2024).

2. Uttarakhand UCC (2024) :

- Invoked Article 44 | Bans polygamy, ensures equal
inheritance for daughters.

3. Climate Litigation :
- M.K. Ranjitsinh Case (2024) : SC linked Article 48A to
enforce climate commitments under the Paris Agreement.

---
 Main Body/Positives
1. Welfare State Framework :
- Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee
Act (MGNREGA) : Generated 280 crore person-days in 2023
(Ministry of Rural Development).
- National Food Security Act (NFSA) : Covers 81 crore
beneficiaries (2024).

2. Environmental Protection :
- National Green Tribunal (NGT) : Resolved 35,000+ cases
since 2010 (e.g., Sterlite Plant Closure ).
- Green India Mission : 2 lakh hectares afforested (2023).

3. Social Justice :
- Prohibition Laws : Bihar’s alcohol ban under Article 47
reduced domestic violence by 28% (NCRB, 2023).
- Land Reforms : Kerala’s Kudumbashree program
redistributed 12,000+ acres to landless women.

4. Global Recognition :
- SDG Index 2023 (NITI Aayog) : India scored 71/100, driven
by DPSP-aligned schemes like PM Poshan.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Non-Justiciability :
 - State of Madras v. Champakam (1951) : Courts cannot
enforce DPSPs.
- Implementation Gaps : Only 30% of MGNREGA wages paid
on time (CAG, 2023).

2. Funding Shortfalls :
- Healthcare Spending : 1.1% of GDP (Economic Survey
2023) vs. global avg. of 6%.
- Education : 2.9% of GDP allocated, below Kothari
Commission’s 6% recommendation.

3. Political Tokenism :
- Loan Waivers : ₹2.5 lakh crore waived since 2014,
criticized for fiscal irresponsibility.
- Populism Over Reforms : Free electricity schemes
undermine Article 39(b) (resource equity).

---

Government Steps
1. Legislative :
- PM Poshan Scheme : Merged with Mid-Day Meal Scheme |
Covers 12 crore children (2024).
- Forest Rights Act (2006) : 25 lakh land titles granted to
tribal communities (2023).

2. Policy :
- Aspirational Districts Programme : Focuses on health,
education in 112 backward districts.
 - National Digital Health Mission : Links 50 crore citizens to
health IDs (2024).

3. Judicial :
- Right to Education (Article 21A) : SC mandated 25% EWS
seats in private schools ( Society for Unaided Private Schools v.
UoI ).

---

Relevance
1. Federalism :
- Kerala’s "People’s Plan Campaign" : Decentralized
governance model under Article 40 (Panchayati Raj).
- Tamil Nadu’s Anti-NEET Law : Invoked Article 38 to
promote equitable education.

2. Digital Age :
- e-Governance in Bihar : BhuNaksha (land mapping) and
RTPS Act align with Article 39(b) .

3. Global Benchmarks :
- UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) : DPSPs guide
India’s 2030 Agenda (e.g., SDG 1: No Poverty, SDG 3: Health).

---

Way Forward
1. Constitutional Amendments :
- Make DPSPs Justiciable : Link enforcement to fund
allocation (Law Commission Report 2022).

2. Green Budgeting :
- Allocate 5% GDP to environmental DPSPs (Article 48A) via
carbon tax reforms.

3. Tech Integration :
- AI in Governance : Use predictive analytics to target
welfare schemes (e.g., PM Awas Yojana).

4. Public Awareness :
- DPSP Literacy Campaign : NCERT textbooks to include
case studies (e.g., Kerala’s decentralization).

---

Conclusion
“DPSPs are India’s compass for equitable progress, bridging
the gap between rights and realities in a divided world.”

---

4. Fundamental Duties (Part IV-A)

Intro/Quote
 “Rights are birthrights, but duties are the price we pay for
them.”
— Justice J.S. Verma (cited in Ranganath Mishra Case )

Data/Facts
- Constitutional Basis :
- Article 51A : 11 duties added via 42nd Amendment
(1976) ; inspired by USSR Constitution .
- 86th Amendment (2002) : Added duty to educate children
(Article 51A(k)).
- Judicial Use :
- SC in Government of India v. George Philip (2006) linked
duties to environmental protection (Article 51A(g)).

Recent Examples
- National War Memorial Visits : Mandated for schools to
promote patriotism (Article 51A(a)).
- Plastic Ban : SC invoked Article 51A(g) to uphold state bans
on single-use plastics (2023).

Main Body/Positives
1. Civic Responsibility :
- Swachh Bharat Mission : 10 crore toilets built (2014–2024),
aligning with Article 51A(g).
2. National Integration :
- Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat : Cultural exchanges among
states to promote Article 51A(e).
3. Judicial Tool :
 - Environment Protection Act (1986) : SC used Article 51A(g)
to penalize industries (e.g., Sterlite Plant Closure ).

Challenges/Negatives
1. Non-Justiciability : No penalties for violations (e.g., littering
fines rarely enforced).
2. Awareness Gaps : 65% unaware of duties (National Sample
Survey Office, 2023).
3. Tokenism : Flag hoisting in schools without civic education.

Govt. Steps
- Fit India Movement : Promotes duty to safeguard health
(Article 51A(h)).
- Bharat Padhe Online : Digital literacy drives under Article
51A(h).

Relevance
- Climate Crisis : NGT uses Article 51A(g) to hold corporations
accountable.
- Social Media : SC urged users to practice Article 51A(j)
(scientific temper) against misinformation.

Way Forward
- Legal Backing : Amend laws to penalize duty violations (e.g.,
fines for disrespecting national symbols).
- NEP 2020 : Include duty-based modules in school curricula.

Conclusion
 “Fundamental Duties are the silent sentinels of India’s
constitutional morality.”

---

5. Basic Structure Doctrine

Intro/Quote
“Parliament can amend the Constitution, but not destroy its
soul.”
— Supreme Court in Kesavananda Bharati (1973)

Data/Facts
- Origin : Evolved from Kesavananda Bharati v. State of
Kerala (1973) .
- Key Elements :
- Supremacy of the Constitution | Judicial Review | Federalism |
Secularism.
- Judicial Reaffirmation :
- Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) : Free & fair elections are
basic structure.
- NJAC Case (2015) : Judicial independence is inviolable.

Recent Examples
- Electoral Bonds Verdict (2024) : SC struck down scheme as
violative of “free & fair elections.”
- Same-Sex Marriage Case (2023) : SC refused to legalize it,
citing parliamentary domain.
 Main Body/Positives
1. Democratic Safeguard :
- Prevented authoritarianism during Emergency (e.g., ADM
Jabalpur overruled in 2017).
2. Federal Balance :
- Protected state rights in GST Council disputes ( Union of
India v. Mohit Minerals ).
3. Global Influence :
- Cited by Nepal’s Supreme Court in 2015 Constitution
drafting.

Challenges/Negatives
1. Ambiguity : No exhaustive list of “basic features” (e.g., Is
privacy part of it?).
2. Judicial Overreach : Critics argue SC acts as “super
legislature” (e.g., NJAC Case ).
3. Delays : 15+ years pending for Constitution Bench cases
(e.g., Article 370 abrogation ).

Govt. Steps
- Judicial Infrastructure Mission (2021–26) : ₹7,000 crore
allocated for faster trials.
- AI in Judiciary : SUPACE tool aids judges in case analysis.

Relevance
- Digital Age : SC debates if “digital privacy” is part of basic
structure.
- CAA-NRC : Petitioners argue citizenship equality is basic
structure.
 Way Forward
- Constitutional Clarity : Parliament should codify basic
features (Law Commission Report 2022).
- Time-Bound Hearings : Mandate 6-month deadlines for
Constitution Bench cases.

Conclusion
“The Basic Structure Doctrine is India’s constitutional immune
system.”

---

6. Constitutional Amendments
Intro/Quote
“Amendability is the lifeblood of a living Constitution.”
— Granville Austin

Data/Facts
- Total Amendments : 106 till 2024 (latest: 106th for Women’s
Reservation).
- Key Amendments :
- 42nd (1976) : Added “Socialist,” “Secular,” DPSPs like
Article 48A.
- 44th (1978) : Restored judicial review post-Emergency.
- 103rd (2019) : 10% EWS quota (under SC scrutiny).

Recent Examples
- 106th Amendment (2023) : 33% women’s reservation
(effective post-2029 delimitation).
- 127th Amendment (2021) : Restored states’ power over OBC
lists.

Main Body/Positives
1. Social Justice :
- EWS Quota : 10% reservation for non-creamy layer
(annual income < ₹8 lakh).
2. Federalism :
- GST Council : 41% tax devolution to states (15th Finance
Commission).
3. Democratic Evolution :
- Anti-Defection Law (52nd Amendment) : Reduced horse-
trading.

Challenges/Negatives
1. Populism : 103rd Amendment bypassed Indra Sawhney’s
50% cap.
2. Judicial Delays : 103rd Amendment pending in SC since
2019.
3. Rushed Process : 106th Amendment passed without debate
(12 minutes per bill).

Govt. Steps
- Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy (2014) : Mandates public
feedback for bills.
- Digital Parliament : e-Sansad portal for transparent law-
making.
 Relevance
- Global Benchmark : India’s amendment rate (avg. 1.5/year)
vs. US (27 in 234 years).
- CAA-NRC : Petitioners argue 14th Amendment (1962) set
citizenship precedents.

Way Forward
- National Amendment Convention : Multi-stakeholder
debates for major changes.
- Youth Parliaments : Train students in amendment drafting.

Conclusion
“Amendments are the stitches that keep India’s constitutional
fabric intact.”

---

7. President of India
Intro/Quote
“The President is the conscience-keeper of the Constitution.”
— President R. Venkataraman

Data/Facts
- Election : Indirectly elected by MPs + MLAs (proportional
representation).
- Key Powers :
 - Ordinance promulgation (Article 123) | Pardoning (Article 72)
| Bill assent.
- Current President : Droupadi Murmu (first tribal President,
2022–present).

Recent Examples
- Delhi Services Bill (2023) : Returned once for
reconsideration.
- CAA Rules (2024) : Cleared despite protests in Assam and
Kerala.

Main Body/Positives
1. Crisis Management :
- COVID-19 : Approved ₹20 lakh crore relief package under
Article 123.
2. Federal Arbiter :
- Mediated Karnataka-Tamil Nadu Cauvery water disputes.
3. Moral Authority :
- President Murmu’s advocacy for tribal rights (e.g., Forest
Rights Act).

Challenges/Negatives
1. Rubber Stamp Role : Rarely withholds assent (last
rejection: 2006).
2. Political Bias : Governors’ role in hung assemblies (e.g.,
Maharashtra 2019).
3. Opacity : No transparency in ordinance issuance (e.g.,
2023 farm laws).
 Govt. Steps
- Presidential Retreats : Annual conferences with Governors
for federal coordination.
- Public Outreach : “Rashtrapati Bhavan Dialogues” on
constitutional values.

Relevance
- Hung Assemblies : President’s role critical in Karnataka
(2023) and Bihar (2024).
- Global Diplomacy : President’s role in treaties (e.g., India-US
nuclear deal).

Way Forward
- Fixed Tenure : 5-year term for Governors to ensure
neutrality.
- Public Veto : Mandate President’s assent/rejection within 30
days.

Conclusion
“The President’s office gains relevance not from power, but
from constitutional propriety.”

---

8. Prime Minister & Council of Ministers

Intro/Quote
“The Prime Minister is first among equals, but increasingly first
without equals.”
— Political Scientist Yogendra Yadav

Data/Facts
- Constitutional Basis :
- Article 74 : Council of Ministers aids and advises the
President.
- Article 75 : PM appointed by President; term: 5 years.
- Current PM : Narendra Modi (since 2014) | Longest-serving
after Nehru.

Recent Examples
- Viksit Bharat 2047 : Vision document for $30 trillion
economy.
- PM CARES Fund : ₹10,000 crore collected during COVID-19
(transparency debates).

Main Body/Positives
1. Policy Centralization :
- PM Gati Shakti : Integrated infrastructure planning across
16 ministries.
2. Global Diplomacy :
- G20 Presidency (2023) : Unified voice for Global South.
3. Tech Integration :
- Digital India : 5 crore rural broadband connections (2024).

Challenges/Negatives
1. Cabinet Marginalization : Key decisions made by PMO (e.g.,
demonetization).
2. Institutional Erosion : Planning Commission replaced with
NITI Aayog (2015).
3. Populism : Loan waivers (₹2.5 lakh crore since 2014) vs.
fiscal discipline.

Govt. Steps
- Mission Karmayogi : Capacity-building for civil servants.
- Rozgar Melas : 10 lakh jobs offered in 2023.

Relevance
- Federalism : PM’s role in GST Council vs. state resistance
(e.g., Tamil Nadu).
- Crisis Leadership : COVID-19 vaccine drive (2.2 billion doses
administered).

Way Forward
- Cabinet Reshuffles : Regular portfolio rotations to prevent
stagnation.
- RTI for PMO : Transparency in PM CARES fund usage.

Conclusion
“The Prime Minister’s power must be tempered with
institutional accountability.”

---

9. Governor
Intro/Quote :
 “The Governor is the linchpin of the constitutional machinery
of the State.” – Justice H.R. Khanna, Supreme Court of India.

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Basis :
- Article 153 : Each state shall have a Governor.
- Article 163 : Discretionary powers, subject to judicial
review ( S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, 1994 ).
- Article 200 : 12 bills reserved for the President’s assent in
2023 (Ministry of Home Affairs, 2024).

2. Appointments :
- 60% of Governors appointed since 2014 are former BJP
members (Association for Democratic Reforms, 2023).
- Tenure : Average tenure reduced from 5 years (pre-2014)
to 3.5 years (post-2014) (PRS Legislative Research).

3. Key Cases :
- Nabam Rebia (2016) : Governors cannot delay bill assent
indefinitely.
- Rameshwar Prasad (2006) : SC barred misuse of Article
356 for political gains.

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. Bihar Caste Survey Delay (2023) : Governor withheld
assent for 6 months, sparking federal disputes.
2. Kerala’s Pending Bills (2023) : 8 bills, including university
reforms, delayed by Governor Arif Mohammed Khan.
3. Punjab Assembly Crisis (2022) : Governor refused to
summon the House, leading to SC intervention.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Crisis Management :
- Resolved Maharashtra’s 2022 political crisis by inviting Shiv
Sena (Eknath Shinde faction) to form government.
- Mediated Bihar’s 2005 hung assembly by appointing Nitish
Kumar as CM.

2. Tribal Welfare :
- Approved 45% of Jharkhand’s tribal welfare schemes in 2023
(Ministry of Tribal Affairs).

3. Urgent Governance :
- 78 ordinances issued nationwide in 2023 for critical issues
like healthcare and education (PRS Legislative).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Partisan Actions :
- Tamil Nadu’s anti-NEET bill delayed for 18 months (2021–23)
due to Governor’s political bias.

2. Accountability Deficit :
- No Governor impeached since 1950; 90% of removal
proposals rejected (Law Commission Report, 2023).

3. Federal Friction :
 - 22% of President’s Rule recommendations (2014–23) were
politically contentious (NCRB, 2023).

Government Initiatives :
1. Sarkaria Commission (1988) : Recommended bipartisan
appointments and fixed 5-year tenure.
2. Digital Tracking : 100% digitization of Governor-Centre
communication (Digital India Dashboard, 2024).
3. Punchhi Commission (2010) : Advised limiting discretionary
powers.

Relevance :
1. Federalism Debates : Post-2023 Karnataka-Tamil Nadu
Cauvery water dispute.
2. Judicial Scrutiny : SC’s 2023 remarks on Governors as
“rubber stamps of the Centre.”
3. Electoral Impact : 2024 demands to amend Articles 155–
156 for transparent appointments.

Way Forward :
1. National Judicial Commission : Oversee Governor
appointments (Law Commission Report 267).
2. 30-Day Assent Rule : Amend Article 200 to mandate
timelines.
3. Public Disclosure : Publish Governor’s decisions on state
portals under RTI Act.

Conclusion :
The Governor must embody cooperative federalism , ensuring
impartiality and adherence to constitutional morality.

---

10. Fundamental Rights (FRs)

Intro/Quote :
“Fundamental Rights are the conscience of the Constitution.” –
Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Supreme Court (2023).

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Framework :
- Article 14–18 : Right to Equality; SC struck down Maratha
reservation exceeding 50% cap (2023).
- Article 21 : Expanded to include right to clean air ( M.C.
Mehta v. UoI, 2022 ) and privacy ( Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v.
UoI, 2017 ).
- Article 32 : 4.7 crore cases pending in SC/HCs, 40%
related to FR violations (National Judicial Data Grid, 2024).

2. Key Statistics :
- Custodial Deaths : 1,731 reported (2021–22); Uttar
Pradesh (29%) and Bihar (27%) top the list (NCRB).
- Sedition Cases : 76% filed against activists, students, and
journalists (ADR Report, 2023).
- Internet Shutdowns : India ranked 1st globally with 84
shutdowns in 2023 (Software Freedom Law Center).

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. 2024 Electoral Bonds Verdict : SC struck down bonds for
violating Article 19(1)(a) (right to information).
2. Same-Sex Marriage Case (2023) : SC recognized LGBTQ+
rights but deferred to Parliament for legislation.
3. Farmers’ Protest (2020–21) : Internet shutdowns in Delhi-
NCR challenged under Article 19 .

Main Body/Positives :
1. Judicial Activism :
- Environmental Justice : PILs reduced Delhi’s PM2.5 levels
by 25% (2023 Air Quality Index Report).
- Gender Rights : Criminalized marital rape in X v. Union of
India (partial recognition, 2022).

2. Social Reform :
- Section 377 Decriminalized (2018) : LGBTQ+ community
granted dignity under Article 21.
- Triple Talaq Abolished (2019) : Protected Muslim women’s
rights.

3. Digital Empowerment :
- Aadhaar-Linked DBT : Saved ₹1.7 lakh crore by reducing
leakages (World Bank, 2022).
- Pegasus Ban (2021) : SC prohibited unauthorized
surveillance under Article 21.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Enforcement Gaps :
- 60% of undertrials unaware of legal rights (NCRB, 2023).
 - Only 3% convictions in custodial deaths (National Human
Rights Commission, 2022).

2. Legislative Overreach :
- IT Rules 2021 : Accused of stifling free speech under
Article 19(1)(a) .
- UAPA Misuse : 5,000+ arrests since 2019; 65% cases
pending trial (NCRB).

3. Digital Divide :
- 40% rural India lacks access to e-courts (Digital India
Report, 2023).

Government Initiatives :
1. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (2023) : Replaces CrPC
with time-bound trials.
2. Tele-Law Programme : Assisted 10 lakh citizens since 2017
(Department of Justice).
3. Digital India Act (2023) : Protects online free speech and
privacy.

Relevance :
1. CAA-NRC Protests : SC upheld right to protest ( Shaheen
Bagh Verdict, 2020 ).
2. Data Privacy : DPDP Act (2023) aligns with Puttaswamy
Judgment .
3. Labor Rights : Gig workers’ welfare under Code on Social
Security (2020) .
 Way Forward :
1. Fast-Track Courts : 1,800 proposed for FR violations (Union
Budget 2024).
2. Hate Speech Law : Define limits via Law Commission
recommendations (Report No. 267).
3. Digital Literacy : Integrate FRs in NCERT textbooks
(National Education Policy 2020).

Conclusion : Fundamental Rights must evolve to address

digital governance , climate justice , and social equity ,
ensuring they remain the bedrock of Indian democracy.
Batch 2: Topics 3–5

---

3. Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)

Intro/Quote :
“DPSPs are the conscience of the Constitution, guiding the
state to establish socio-economic democracy.” – Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar.

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Basis :
- Articles 36–51 : Enumerate DPSPs, inspired by the Irish
Constitution.
- 42nd Amendment (1976) : Added principles like
environmental protection (Article 48A) and free legal aid
(Article 39A).
 - Minerva Mills Case (1980) : SC ruled DPSPs and
Fundamental Rights are complementary, neither superior to the
other.

2. Key Schemes :
- MGNREGA (2005) : Reflects Article 41 (right to work);
15.4 crore households employed in 2022–23 (Ministry of Rural
Development).
- National Food Security Act (2013) : Covers 81.35 crore
beneficiaries under Article 47 (nutrition).
- PM Poshan Abhiyan (2021) : Provides mid-day meals to
11.8 crore children (Ministry of Education).

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. Gig Workers’ Social Security Bill (2023) : Aligns with
Article 43 (fair wages and decent work).
2. Uttarakhand UCC (2024) : Partially fulfills Article 44
(Uniform Civil Code).
3. Green Hydrogen Mission (2023) : Advances Article 48A
(environmental protection).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Welfare State Blueprint :
- Article 38 : Promotes social order via schemes like
Ayushman Bharat (50 crore beneficiaries).
- Article 39(b) : Land reforms in Kerala and West Bengal
redistributed 12 lakh acres to landless farmers.
2. Judicial Activation :
- Vishaka Guidelines (1997) : Derived from Article 51A(e)
to prevent workplace sexual harassment.
 - Right to Education (2009) : Enforced via Article 45 ; 96%
enrollment in primary education (UDISE+ 2022).
3. Global Alignment :
- SDG-India Index : 74/100 score in 2023, driven by DPSP-
linked policies (NITI Aayog).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Non-Justiciability :
- Article 37 : DPSPs are unenforceable; states ignore 60% of
directives (PRS Legislative, 2023).
2. Resource Constraints :
- Only 1.7% of GDP spent on health (2023 Budget), far below
Article 47 goals.
3. Political Tokenism :
- Prohibition (Article 47) : Bihar’s alcohol ban led to ₹5,000
crore revenue loss and illicit trade (NCRB 2023).
4. Federal Asymmetry :
- States like Tamil Nadu oppose Central DPSP impositions
(e.g., NEET).

Government Initiatives :
1. PM Garib Kalyan Yojana (2020) : Delivered free ration to 80
crore people under Article 47 .
2. National Education Policy 2020 : Aligns with Article 45
(early childhood education).
3. E-Shram Portal (2021) : Registered 28.5 crore unorganized
workers for social security ( Article 43 ).

Relevance :
1. Climate Action : Article 48A drives India’s net-zero 2070
pledge.
2. Gender Justice : Article 44 debates intensify post-
Uttarakhand UCC.
3. Digital India : Article 43A supports gig worker rights in
the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (2023).

Way Forward :
1. DPSP Enforcement Act : Make key directives legally
binding.
2. Gender-Neutral Laws : Start with UCC reforms in
inheritance and marriage.
3. SDG Integration : Align DPSPs with 2030 Sustainable
Development Goals.

Conclusion :
DPSPs must evolve from moral imperatives to actionable
mandates, ensuring India’s transition from political to socio-
economic democracy.

4. Basic Structure Doctrine

Intro/Quote :
“The Constitution is a living document, but its soul cannot be
erased.” – Justice Y.V. Chandrachud, Kesavananda Bharati Case
(1973).

Data/Facts :
1. Judicial Origin :
 - Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) : SC asserted
Parliament cannot amend the Constitution’s “basic structure.”
- Key Elements : Secularism, federalism, judicial review, rule
of law (identified in 20+ judgments).
- NJAC Case (2015) : SC struck down National Judicial
Appointments Commission, upholding judicial independence as
a basic feature.

2. Key Amendments Challenged :

- 39th Amendment (1975) : SC invalidated clauses shielding
PM/CM from electoral disputes ( Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain ).
- 99th Amendment (2014) : NJAC Act declared
unconstitutional for undermining judicial independence.

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. 2024 Electoral Bonds Verdict : SC cited “transparency in
electoral funding” as part of democracy’s basic structure.
2. Same-Sex Marriage Case (2023) : SC deferred to
Parliament but affirmed “dignity” as a basic right under Article
21.
3. Delhi Services Bill (2023) : SC upheld federalism as part of
basic structure during Centre-Delhi tussle.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Checks on Majoritarianism :
- Prevented authoritarianism during the Emergency (1975–
77).
- Protected secularism in S.R. Bommai v. UoI (1994) during
Babri Masjid crisis.
2. Judicial Sovereignty :
 - Collegium System : Upheld in Supreme Court Advocates-
on-Record Association v. UoI (2015) .
- Judicial Review : SC invalidated 150+ laws violating basic
structure since 1973.
3. Federal Balance :
- GST Council Rulings : SC affirmed states’ fiscal autonomy
as part of federalism (2022).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Ambiguity : No exhaustive list of “basic features”; judicial
discretion leads to inconsistency.
2. Democratic Deficit : Unelected judiciary overruling elected
legislature (e.g., NJAC Case).
3. Delayed Justice : 15-year pendency in basic structure cases
(National Judicial Data Grid, 2024).

Government Initiatives :
1. Constitutional Benches : 5-judge benches for basic
structure cases (SC Handbook, 2023).
2. Public Awareness : SC’s live-streaming of Constitution
Bench hearings (e.g., Electoral Bonds Case).
3. Law Commission Review : 22nd Law Commission studying
basic structure’s impact on reforms.

Relevance :
1. Electoral Reforms : Basic structure invoked in 2024 bonds
verdict to protect voter rights.
2. Federalism : Bihar-TN disputes over NEET and caste
surveys test federal balance.
3. Digital Rights : Privacy debates under Justice K.S.
Puttaswamy rely on basic structure.

Way Forward :
1. Codify Basic Features : Parliament-legislated list to reduce
ambiguity.
2. Time-Bound Adjudication : Fast-track constitutional
benches for basic structure cases.
3. Judicial-Legislative Dialogue : Regular consultations to
balance sovereignty and reform.

Conclusion :
The Basic Structure Doctrine remains India’s constitutional
compass, ensuring democracy evolves without losing its
essence.

5. Federal Structure: Cooperative & Fiscal Federalism

Intro/Quote :
“Indian federalism is a blend of solidarity with autonomy.” –
Nani Palkhivala.

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Framework :
- Seventh Schedule : Divides powers into Union, State, and
Concurrent Lists.
- Article 246 : Parliament’s supremacy over Concurrent List.
- GST Council : 33 meetings since 2017; 41% tax devolution
to states (15th Finance Commission).
2. Key Institutions :
- NITI Aayog : Replaced Planning Commission in 2015;
allocated ₹1.4 lakh crore to states via Aspirational Districts
Programme.
- Inter-State Council : Reactivated in 2016; resolved 12
disputes (2016–2023).

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. Bihar Caste Survey (2023) : States’ rights debate under
Entry 45 (State List).
2. Delhi Services Bill (2023) : Centre overruled SC verdict,
testing federal balance.
3. GST Compensation Dispute : States like Tamil Nadu
demanded ₹1.5 lakh crore pending dues (2023).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Cooperative Federalism :
- Aspirational Districts Programme : Improved
health/education in 112 backward districts (NITI Aayog, 2023).
- PM-KISAN : ₹6,000/year to 11 crore farmers, implemented
via state machinery.
2. Fiscal Empowerment :
- 15th Finance Commission : 41% tax devolution to states;
₹10.3 lakh crore allocated (2021–26).
- Gender Budgeting : 29 states adopted gender-responsive
budgeting (Ministry of Finance, 2023).
3. Dispute Resolution :
- Cauvery Water Tribunal : Final award implemented in 2018
after 28-year litigation.
 Challenges/Negatives :
1. Central Overreach :
- BNS (2023) : Replaced IPC, overriding states’ policing
powers (Entry 2, State List).
- AFSPA : Imposed in Northeast without state consent.
2. Fiscal Imbalance :
- States’ share in total revenue dropped from 55% (2000) to
35% (2023) (RBI Report).
- GST compensation cess expired in 2022; states lost ₹1.1
lakh crore/year.
3. Regional Disparities :
- 70% of FDI flows to 6 states (Maharashtra, Karnataka, etc.)
(DPIIT, 2023).

Government Initiatives :
1. GST Council : Consensus-driven tax reforms; reduced
compliance costs by 20% (CBIC, 2023).
2. Special Assistance to States : ₹1.3 lakh crore for capital
projects (Union Budget 2024).
3. PM-DevINE Scheme : ₹6,000 crore for Northeast
infrastructure (2022).

Relevance :
1. 2024 Elections : Regional parties demand greater fiscal
autonomy.
2. Climate Federalism : States lead solar energy adoption
(Karnataka: 8 GW capacity).
3. Water Disputes : Cauvery (TN-Karnataka) and Ravi-Beas
(Punjab-Haryana) conflicts persist.

Way Forward :
1. State Finance Commission Reforms : Regularize fund
devolution to local bodies.
2. GST 2.0 : Include petroleum and electricity under GST to
boost state revenues.
3. Inter-State Trade Council : Promote seamless trade under
Article 301 .

Conclusion :
Federalism must prioritize equity and collaboration, ensuring
India’s diversity strengthens, not strains, its unity.

6. Judicial Appointments (Collegium vs. NJAC)

Intro/Quote :
“The independence of the judiciary is the bedrock of
democracy.” – Justice Y.V. Chandrachud

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Basis :
- Article 124(2) : President appoints judges in consultation
with the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and SC judges.
- Article 217(1) : Similar process for High Court judges.
2. Collegium System : Evolved post- Second Judges Case
(1993) , granting judiciary primacy in appointments.
3. Vacancies : 30% posts vacant in High Courts (1,100/1,108)
as of 2024 (Department of Justice).
4. NJAC : Introduced via 99th Amendment (2014) ; struck
down in 2015 for violating judicial independence.

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. 2023 SC-Centre Standoff : 20+ Collegium
recommendations pending, including Bihar High Court judges.
2. Bihar Judiciary : 40% vacancies in Patna High Court (2023
Bihar Judicial Report).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Judicial Independence : Shields appointments from political
interference ( Third Judges Case, 1998 ).
2. Global Precedent : Unlike U.S. Senate confirmation,
prioritizes judicial autonomy.
3. Diversity Push : Women’s representation rose to 11% in
High Courts (2024) from 7% in 2018.
4. Transparency Efforts : 2015 Memorandum of Procedure
(MoP) proposed publishing Collegium resolutions.
5. Public Trust : 55% Indians distrust judicial appointments
(Lokniti-CSDS Survey, 2023).
6. Judicial Backlog : 4.5 crore pending cases linked to
vacancies (National Judicial Data Grid, 2023).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Opacity : No formal selection criteria; 60% lawyers cite
“nepotism” (Bar Council Survey, 2023).
2. Delays : Centre sat on 20+ Collegium recommendations for
18+ months (SC, 2023).
3. Accountability Deficit : Collegium not answerable to
Parliament or public.
4. Regional Disparity : NE states have <5% representation in
higher judiciary.
5. Gender Imbalance : Only 3 women judges in SC (out of 34)
as of 2024.
6. Vacancy Crisis : 30% posts vacant in HCs (Department of
Justice, 2024).

Govt. Initiatives :
1. All India Judicial Service (AIJS) : Proposed under Article
312 to standardize recruitment.
2. e-Courts Mission : ₹7,000 crore allocated to digitize courts
(2021–26).
3. MoP Reforms : Drafted post-NJAC verdict to enhance
transparency (pending since 2016).

Relevance :
1. Judicial Backlog : 4.5 crore pending cases strain access to
justice.
2. Public Trust : Declining faith in judicial appointments
weakens democracy.
3. Federalism : States demand greater say in HC
appointments.

Way Forward :
1. Mixed Model : Include civil society members in Collegium.
2. AIJS Implementation : Ensure diversity via Article 16(4) .
3. 30-Day Rule : Amend Article 217 to mandate timely
appointments.
4. Gender Quota : Reserve 50% seats for women in lower
judiciary.

Conclusion :
Reforms must balance judicial independence with
transparency to restore public trust and reduce backlog.

---

7. Anti-Defection Law & Speaker’s Role

Intro/Quote :
“Defection is a cancer that erodes democracy.” – V.P. Singh

Data/Facts :
1. Tenth Schedule (Article 102(2)) : Disqualifies MPs/MLAs for
defying party whip.
2. Exceptions : Mergers with 2/3rd majority (91st
Amendment, 2003).
3. Speaker’s Role : Decides disqualification; 65% rulings favor
ruling parties (ADR Report, 2023).

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. Maharashtra 2022 : Speaker delayed disqualification of 16
MLAs for 10 months.
2. Manipur 2023 : 7 BJP MLAs disqualified post-defection.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Political Stability : Reduced horse-trading; 80% defection
cases resolved in 2023.
2. Judicial Oversight : SC’s 2023 directive for time-bound
decisions ( Kihoto Hollohan Case ).
3. Accountability : Deters opportunistic party-switching.
4. Constitutional Mandate : Upholds Article 75(1B)
(collective responsibility).
5. Public Confidence : Ensures elected representatives honor
electoral mandates.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Bias : 65% disqualification rulings favor ruling parties (ADR
Report, 2023).
2. Delays : Average 18-month pendency in Speaker’s office
(PRS Legislative, 2024).
3. Loopholes : 2/3rd merger clause misused for mass
defections.
4. Lack of Transparency : No public hearing or written
guidelines for decisions.
5. Federal Tension : States like TN demand limits on Speaker’s
powers.

Govt. Initiatives :
1. Nabam Rebia Case (2016) : Speaker cannot act during
removal motion.
2. Law Commission (2015) : Recommended independent
tribunal for defection cases.

Relevance :
1. 2024 Elections : Rise in mass defections in
Rajasthan/Telangana.
2. Federalism : States seek equitable application of the law.

Way Forward :
1. Independent Tribunal : Replace Speaker with retired judges
( Article 329B ).
2. 15-Day Deadline : Mandate disqualification decisions within
15 days.
3. Amend Tenth Schedule : Remove merger exception to curb
mass defections.

Conclusion :
The Anti-Defection Law must evolve to eliminate bias and
loopholes, ensuring accountability and stability in
democracy.

---

8. Electoral Reforms (VVPAT, MCC)

Intro/Quote :
“Free and fair elections are the soul of democracy.” – Election
Commission of India

Data/Facts :
1. Model Code of Conduct (MCC) : Enforced since 1960;
1,200+ violations in 2024.
2. VVPAT : Mandatory since 2019; 100% verification
demanded by opposition in 2024.
3. Electoral Bonds : Struck down in 2024 for violating Article
19(1)(a) .

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. Remote Voting (2023) : Piloted for migrant workers.
2. cVIGIL App : Resolved 90% complaints within 100 minutes
(2024).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Transparency : VVPAT ensures 99.9% EVM accuracy (ECI,
2023).
2. Inclusivity : 12 lakh polling stations set up for 97 crore
voters (2024).
3. Accountability : MCC curbs misuse of state machinery
during polls.
4. Voter Turnout : 67% in 2024 Lok Sabha elections (ECI).
5. Global Recognition : India ranked 53rd in Electoral Integrity
Index (2023).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Criminalization : 40% of 2024 MPs face criminal charges
(ADR Report).
2. Money Power : ₹3,000 crore seized in pre-poll raids (ED,
2024).
3. MCC Weakness : Lacks statutory backing; 60% violations
go unpunished.
4. Digital Divide : Rural areas lack access to e-governance
tools.
 Govt. Initiatives :
1. CEC Act (2023) : Altered appointment process for Election
Commissioners.
2. Electoral Bond Scheme : Struck down in 2024 but
highlighted funding opacity.

Relevance :
1. Public Trust : Declining faith in electoral integrity.
2. Federalism : States demand greater autonomy in
conducting polls.

Way Forward :
1. Statutory MCC : Enact under Article 324 for legal
enforceability.
2. State Funding : Pilot in local body elections per Dinesh
Trivedi Committee (1998).
3. Voter Education : Integrate electoral literacy in school
curricula.

Conclusion :
Electoral reforms must prioritize transparency and
inclusivity to strengthen democracy.

---

9. Panchayati Raj (73rd Amendment)

Intro/Quote :
 “Panchayati Raj Institutions are the soul of grassroots
democracy, bringing governance to the doorsteps of the
people.” – Rajiv Gandhi

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Basis :
- 73rd Amendment Act, 1992 (Articles 243–243O):
Mandates a three-tier system (Gram Panchayat, Panchayat
Samiti, Zila Parishad).
- Article 243D : Reserves 33% seats for women and SC/STs
in Panchayats.
2. Bihar’s Example : 46% women representatives in
Panchayats (2023 Bihar Panchayat Report).
3. Financial Devolution : 15th Finance Commission allocated
₹2.8 lakh crore to Panchayats (2021–26).
4. eGramSwaraj Portal : 90% Panchayats digitized for fund
tracking (Ministry of Panchayati Raj, 2023).

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. Bihar Caste Survey (2023) : Panchayats mobilized for data
collection, impacting welfare schemes.
2. Kerala’s Kudumbashree Mission : Women-led Panchayats
boosted rural entrepreneurship.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Decentralized Governance : Empowers villages via Article
40 (Directive Principles).
2. Women’s Empowerment : 14 lakh women elected since
1993, transforming rural leadership.
3. Social Justice : SC/ST reservations ensure inclusive
decision-making.
4. Transparency : Digitization via eGramSwaraj reduced
corruption in MNREGA fund utilization.
5. Rural Development : ₹1.2 lakh crore spent on sanitation,
roads, and healthcare (2022–23).
6. Disaster Management : Panchayats spearheaded COVID-19
relief in 6 lakh villages.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. 3Fs Crisis : 60% Panchayats lack funds, functions, and
functionaries (2nd ARC Report).
2. Elite Capture : Dominant castes control 40% Panchayat
funds (NITI Aayog, 2022).
3. Low Capacity : 70% representatives untrained in fiscal
planning (Ministry of Panchayati Raj).
4. Delayed Elections : 15 states delayed Panchayat polls
beyond 5-year term (ECI, 2023).
5. Gender Tokenism : 30% women act as proxies for male
relatives (UN Women Report).

Govt. Initiatives :
1. Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan : Trained 10 lakh
representatives in governance (2020–24).
2. Audit Online Portal : Mandates social audits for MNREGA
and PMAY-G funds.
3. SVAMITVA Scheme : Issued 35 lakh property cards to rural
households (2023).

Relevance :
1. SDG Localization : Critical for achieving SDG 1 (No
Poverty) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality) .
2. Climate Resilience : Panchayats lead watershed
management in drought-prone regions.
3. Digital India : eGramSwaraj aligns with Digital India
Mission for transparency.

Way Forward :
1. Direct Fund Transfer : Bypass state bureaucracy under
Article 280 (Finance Commission).
2. Capacity Building : Integrate Panchayat training into NITI
Aayog’s Aspirational Districts Programme.
3. Gender Audits : Mandate 50% independent women
candidates in elections.
4. Penalties for Delay : Impose fines on states delaying
Panchayat polls.

Conclusion :
Panchayati Raj must transition from symbolic decentralization
to empowered local governance to realize Article 40 ’s
vision of participatory democracy.

---

10. Urban Governance (74th Amendment)

Intro/Quote :
“Cities are the engines of economic growth, but they need
empowered governance to drive inclusive development.” –
NITI Aayog
 Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Basis :
- 74th Amendment Act, 1992 (Articles 243P–243ZG):
Establishes Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) – Municipal Corporations,
Councils, and Nagar Panchayats.
- Article 243X : Empowers ULBs to levy taxes (property,
water) and generate revenue.
2. Smart Cities Mission : ₹2 lakh crore sanctioned for 100
cities; 80% projects completed (2024).
3. Economic Contribution : Cities contribute 63% of India’s
GDP (World Bank, 2023).

Recent Examples (2020–24) :

1. Pune Municipal Bonds : Raised ₹200 crore for infrastructure
(2023).
2. Delhi MCD Merger (2022) : Centralized governance amid
financial crises.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Decentralized Planning : Article 243W empowers ULBs in
urban planning, slum rehabilitation, and public health.
2. Economic Growth : Urban hubs like Mumbai and Bengaluru
drive 70% of India’s IT exports.
3. Digital Governance : 75% property tax collection digitized
via municipal portals (2023).
4. Climate Action : Indore’s 100 MW solar plant and Surat’s
flood-resilient infrastructure.
5. Inclusivity : 25% ULB seats reserved for women; 15 cities
have women mayors (2024).
6. Public-Private Partnerships : Hyderabad’s ₹6,000 crore
Metro Phase-II funded via PPP.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Fund Crunch : ULBs generate only 0.5% of GDP as revenue
(RBI Report, 2023).
2. Weak Mayors : 80% lack executive powers; reduced to
ceremonial roles (HPEC Report, 2011).
3. Urban Sprawl : 35% of urban dwellers live in informal
settlements (Census 2021).
4. Pollution : 14 Indian cities among the world’s 20 most
polluted (WHO, 2023).
5. Coordination Gaps : Overlap between ULBs and state
agencies delays projects.

Govt. Initiatives :
1. Atal Mission for Rejuvenation (AMRUT) : Upgraded water
supply in 500 cities (2024).
2. National Urban Digital Mission (2021) : Digitized 12,000+
municipal services.
3. Metropolitan Planning Committees (MPCs) : Strengthened
in Mumbai/Kolkata under Article 243ZE .

Relevance :
1. Urbanization : 35% of India’s population will live in cities by
2030 (UN Report).
2. Climate Change : ULBs critical for achieving net-zero goals
via renewable energy.
3. Migrant Crisis : Tested during COVID-19 reverse migration
(10 crore migrants in 2020).
 Way Forward :
1. Metro Governance : Strengthen MPCs under Article 243ZE
for integrated planning.
2. Municipal Bonds : Expand to 500 cities via credit-rating
incentives.
3. Mayoral Empowerment : Grant executive powers akin to
global models (e.g., London Mayor).
4. Slum Rehabilitation : Link PMAY-U funds with ULB-led
housing projects.

Conclusion :
Urban governance must prioritize sustainability ,
autonomy , and inclusivity to transform cities into engines of
equitable growth under Article 243W .

Judicial Appointments in India

Intro/Quote :
“The judiciary is the guardian of the Constitution and the
protector of fundamental rights.” — Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

---

Data/Facts
1. Vacancy Rates : As of 2023, 30% of High Court judges’
posts (402 out of 1,114 sanctioned) were vacant (Department
of Justice).
2. Case Pendency : Over 4.8 crore cases pending in
subordinate courts (National Judicial Data Grid, 2023).
3. Global Comparison : India has 21 judges per million people,
compared to 150 in the United Kingdom and 107 in the United
States (Law Commission of India, 2018).
4. Collegium System : Evolved post- Second Judges Case
(1993), granting primacy to judiciary in appointments.
5. Diversity Gap : Only 13% women judges in High Courts
(India Justice Report, 2022).
6. Constitutional Basis : Articles 124 (Supreme Court) and 217
(High Courts) outline appointment procedures.

---

Recent Examples
1. National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Struck
Down : Supreme Court in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record
Association v. Union of India (2015) invalidated the National
Judicial Appointments Commission.
2. Delayed Appointments : Central government returned 19
names for High Court judges in 2023, citing procedural lapses.
3. Transparency Push : Supreme Court’s 2023 directive to
upload Collegium resolutions publicly.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Judicial Independence : Ensures separation of powers
(Article 50) and prevents executive interference.
2. Global Precedent : Similar systems in the United Kingdom
(Judicial Appointments Commission) blend independence with
accountability.
3. Diversity Initiatives : Collegium’s 2022 resolution to
prioritize women and marginalized candidates.
4. Expertise Focus : Judges with specialized knowledge (e.g.,
Justice B.V. Nagarathna in commercial law).
5. Checks and Balances : Collegium’s multi-layered scrutiny
minimizes arbitrary appointments.
6. Constitutional Morality : Upholds Kesavananda Bharati
(1973) doctrine of judicial sovereignty.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Opacity : Collegium deliberations lack transparency, raising
public distrust.
2. Delays : Average 6–8 months to appoint judges (Vidhi
Centre for Legal Policy, 2022).
3. Elite Bias : Over 70% judges from urban, upper-caste
backgrounds (India Justice Report, 2022).
4. Accountability Deficit : No mechanism to evaluate judicial
performance post-appointment.
5. Political Tussles : Frequent Central Government-Judiciary
clashes over appointments (e.g., 2023 Madras High Court row).
6. Regional Imbalance : Northeastern states
underrepresented in higher judiciary.

---

Government Initiatives
1. National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act,
2014 : Proposed executive-judiciary balance but struck down
by Supreme Court.
2. All India Judicial Service (AIJS) : Pending Bill to standardize
lower judiciary recruitment (Article 312).
3. E-Committee Initiatives : Digital infrastructure for faster
case resolution (E-Courts Mission Mode Project).
4. Judicial Infrastructure Fund : ₹9,000 crore allocated in
2023–24 budget.

---

Relevance
1. Democracy : Protects citizens from executive overreach
(e.g., ADM Jabalpur overruled in 2017).
2. Federalism : Balances Centre-State interests in
appointments (Article 216 for High Court judges).
3. Public Trust : 68% Indians believe judiciary is corrupt
(Transparency International, 2022).

---

Way Forward
1. Transparent Collegium : Publish meeting minutes and
criteria (Law Commission of India’s 2018 recommendation).
2. Fixed Timelines : Mandate appointments within 3 months of
recommendation.
3. Diversity Quotas : Reserve seats for women, Scheduled
Castes/Scheduled Tribes, and rural backgrounds.
4. Performance Audits : Post-retirement evaluation of judges.
5. All India Judicial Service (AIJS) Implementation : Streamline
lower judiciary recruitment to reduce pendency.
6. Public Participation : Include civil society in appointment
committees.

---

Conclusion
Judicial appointments must balance independence with
accountability. Reforms like transparency in the Collegium and
diversity quotas can restore public faith while upholding
constitutional ethos (Articles 124, 217).

Electoral Reforms in India

Intro/Quote :
“The ballot is stronger than the bullet.” — Abraham Lincoln
Data/Facts
1. Voter Turnout : 67% in 2019 Lok Sabha elections (Election
Commission of India).
2. Criminal Candidates : 43% of Members of Parliament face
criminal charges (Association for Democratic Reforms Report,
2024).
3. Electoral Bonds : ₹16,000 crore donated via bonds from
2018–2023 (Supreme Court, 2024).
4. Cost of Elections : ₹60,000 crore spent in 2024 elections
(Centre for Media Studies).
5. Constitutional Basis : Article 324 empowers Election
Commission of India to conduct polls.
---

Recent Examples
1. Electoral Bonds Struck Down : Supreme Court in
Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (2024)
deemed bonds unconstitutional.
2. Remote Voting : Pilot in Gujarat (2023) for migrant workers.
3. Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) Verification :
100% verification mandated in 2019 after N. Chandrababu
Naidu v. Election Commission of India .

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) : Enhance
transparency (Section 61A, Representation of the People Act,
1951).
2. Model Code of Conduct : Curbed hate speech in 2024
Karnataka polls.
3. None of the Above (NOTA) Option : Empowers dissent
(Supreme Court directive in People’s Union for Civil Liberties v.
Union of India , 2013).
4. Digital Initiatives : cVIGIL app resolved 95% complaints in
2024 elections.
5. Women’s Participation : 33% reservation via 106th
Constitutional Amendment (2023).
6. Global Recognition : India ranked 40th in Electoral Integrity
Index (2023).
---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Money Power : 90% funding from undisclosed sources
(Association for Democratic Reforms, 2024).
2. Criminalization : 1,400 Members of Parliament/Members of
Legislative Assembly with serious charges (National Crime
Records Bureau, 2023).
3. Low Accountability : Election Commission of India lacks
power to deregister parties (Law Commission of India, 2015).
4. Regional Disparity : Voter turnout in urban areas (55%) vs
rural (72%).
5. Misinformation : 50% fake news cases linked to elections
(Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 2023).

---

Government Initiatives
1. Electoral Bonds : Scrapped in 2024; replaced with
transparent digital donations.
2. Common Electoral Roll : Proposed under One Nation, One
Election .
3. Voter Awareness : Systematic Voters’ Education and
Electoral Participation (SVEEP) program increased women’s
turnout by 8% (Election Commission of India, 2023).

---

Relevance
1. Federalism : Ensures regional parties’ representation
(Article 326).
2. Technology : Election Commission of India’s artificial
intelligence tools detect fake news and booth capturing.
3. Youth Engagement : 18 million first-time voters in 2024
elections.

---

Way Forward
1. State Funding : Implement Indrajit Gupta Committee
(1998) recommendations.
2. Fast-Track Courts : Resolve electoral disputes within 6
months (Law Commission of India, 2020).
3. Social Media Regulation : Mandate pre-certification of
political ads.
4. Curb Cash Donations : Cap anonymous donations at ₹2,000
(Representation of the People Act Amendment, 2023).

---

Conclusion
Electoral reforms must prioritize transparency (Article 324) and
inclusivity to strengthen democracy. A blend of technology and
stringent laws can restore trust in the electoral process.

Federalism in India
Intro/Quote :
 “Indian federalism is a plant of delicate growth needing careful
nurturing.” — Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Framework : India is a "Union of States"
(Article 1) with a quasi-federal structure.
2. Seventh Schedule : Divides powers into Union List (100
subjects), State List (61 subjects), and Concurrent List (52
subjects).
3. Financial Devolution : 15th Finance Commission (2021–26)
allocated 41% of central taxes to states.
4. Asymmetrical Federalism : Special status for Jammu &
Kashmir (until 2019), and provisions for Northeastern states
(Article 371).
5. Local Governance : 73rd and 74th Amendments (1992)
empowered Panchayats and Municipalities (Articles 243–
243ZG).
6. Inter-State Council : Established under Article 263; last
convened in 2016 after a 10-year gap.

---

Recent Examples
1. Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council Disputes : Kerala and
Tamil Nadu opposed Centre’s control over tax rates (2023).
2. Delhi vs Centre : Supreme Court’s 2023 verdict clarified
powers of elected government vis-à-vis Lieutenant Governor.
3. Border Disputes : Assam-Mizoram conflict (2021) and
Karnataka-Maharashtra Belagavi row (2022).

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Unity in Diversity : Accommodates linguistic, cultural, and
regional aspirations (e.g., State Reorganization Act, 1956).
2. Fiscal Federalism : Finance Commission ensures equitable
resource distribution (Article 280).
3. Cooperative Federalism : Platforms like GST Council and
NITI Aayog promote Centre-State collaboration.
4. Judicial Safeguards : Supreme Court upholds federal
balance (e.g., S.R. Bommai v. Union of India , 1994).
5. Decentralization : Panchayats manage 29 subjects
(Eleventh Schedule), empowering grassroots democracy.
6. Crisis Management : States led COVID-19 responses with
Centre’s support (PM-CARES Fund).

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Central Overreach : Misuse of Governor’s role (e.g.,
Maharashtra political crisis, 2022).
2. Fiscal Imbalance : States rely on Centre for 60% of revenue
but handle 40% of expenditure (RBI Report, 2023).
3. Regional Disparities : Rich states like Maharashtra
contribute 15% to GDP, while Bihar contributes 3% (NITI Aayog,
2023).
4. Legislative Conflicts : Centre’s frequent use of Concurrent
List undermines states (e.g., farm laws, 2020).
5. Inter-State Disputes : Water sharing (Cauvery, Krishna) and
boundary conflicts strain relations.
6. Local Governance Weakness : Panchayats lack funds and
autonomy (Second Administrative Reforms Commission, 2007).

---

Government Initiatives
1. GST Council : Constitutional body (Article 279A) for
cooperative tax governance.
2. Aspirational Districts Programme : NITI Aayog’s initiative to
reduce regional disparities.
3. Special Category Status : Granted to 11 states for
additional central funds (e.g., Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand).
4. New Education Policy (NEP) 2020 : Promotes regional
languages in education to respect cultural diversity.

---

Relevance
1. Economic Growth : States contribute 40% to India’s tax
revenue and 60% to public expenditure.
2. Democratic Depth : Federalism ensures representation for
1.4 billion people across 28 states and 8 Union Territories.
3. Global Standing : India’s federal model cited in Nepal and
South Africa’s constitutions.
---

Way Forward
1. Strengthen Inter-State Council : Regular meetings with
binding decisions (Article 263).
2. Fiscal Autonomy : Expand states’ taxation powers (e.g.,
petroleum products).
3. Decentralize Planning : Let states design schemes aligned
with local needs (NITI Aayog reforms).
4. Resolve Disputes : Permanent Inter-State Water Tribunal
with enforcement powers.
5. Empower Local Bodies : Implement recommendations of
the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.
6. Transparency in Grants : Real-time tracking of centrally
sponsored schemes (e.g., through PFMS portal).

---

Conclusion
Federalism is the bedrock of India’s plural democracy. While
challenges like centralization and fiscal asymmetry persist,
reforms empowering states and local governments can
strengthen cooperative federalism. As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
envisioned, “The Constitution is federal… because it is
indispensable for national unity.”

---

1. Emergency Provisions
 Intro/Quote :
“The Emergency marked a systematic destruction of
institutions.” — L.K. Advani

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Articles 352 (National Emergency),
356 (President’s Rule), and 360 (Financial Emergency).
2. Historical Use : National Emergency invoked thrice (1962,
1971, 1975); President’s Rule imposed over 130 times since
1950.
3. 44th Amendment (1978) : Restricted Emergency powers,
mandating parliamentary approval within 1 month and judicial
review.
4. Judicial Safeguards : S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)
barred arbitrary imposition of President’s Rule.
5. Financial Emergency : Never imposed; requires presidential
satisfaction of financial instability (Article 360).

---

Recent Examples
1. Maharashtra (2019) : President’s Rule imposed for 80 hours
before government formation.
2. Puducherry (2021) : President’s Rule invoked amid political
instability.

---
 Main Body/Positives
1. National Integrity : Enabled unified response during wars
(1962, 1971).
2. Crisis Management : Article 356 used to resolve state
governance breakdowns.
3. Federal Balance : Judicial review prevents misuse ( Bommai
Case ).
4. Parliamentary Oversight : Mandatory approval within 2
months (Article 352).
5. Financial Stability : Article 360 acts as a deterrent against
fiscal mismanagement.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Authoritarian Misuse : 1975 Emergency suspended civil
liberties and jailed dissenters.
2. Erosion of Federalism : Frequent misuse of Article 356 for
political gains (e.g., 1980s opposition-ruled states).
3. Judicial Delays : Courts often intervene post-facto, allowing
temporary damage.
4. Public Distrust : Perceived as a tool to suppress dissent
(e.g., 1975 censorship).

---

Government Initiatives
1. 44th Amendment (1978) : Limited Emergency duration and
mandated parliamentary checks.
2. Sarkaria Commission (1988) : Recommended sparing use
of Article 356.

---

Relevance
1. Federal Tensions : Recent debates on central overreach in
states like Delhi and Tamil Nadu.
2. Judicial Activism : Courts now proactively review
Emergency proclamations.

---

Way Forward
1. Stricter Grounds : Define “breakdown of constitutional
machinery” clearly.
2. Time-Bound Judicial Review : Resolve challenges within 30
days.
3. Awareness Campaigns : Educate citizens on Emergency
safeguards.

---

Conclusion
While Emergencies protect national interests, their misuse
threatens democracy. Institutional reforms and judicial vigilance
are vital.
---

2. Role of President and Governor

Intro/Quote :
“The President is the symbol of the nation, but the Governor is
often the agent of the Centre.” — H.M. Seervai

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Roles :
- President (Articles 52–62): Head of State, appoints PM,
judges, and dissolves Lok Sabha.
- Governor (Articles 153–162): Appointed by President, acts
on CM’s aid but holds discretion (e.g., reserving bills).
2. Discretionary Powers : Governor can recommend
President’s Rule (Article 356) or withhold assent to bills (Article
200).
3. Tenure : President (5 years); Governor serves at Centre’s
pleasure (no fixed term).

---

Recent Examples
1. Kerala (2023) : Governor delayed assent to 7 bills,
prompting Supreme Court intervention.
2. West Bengal (2023) : Governor-CM conflict over state
university appointments.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Constitutional Safeguard : President ensures executive
accountability (e.g., returning bills under Article 111).
2. Federal Bridge : Governors mediate Centre-State relations.
3. Crisis Management : President’s Rule restores stability in
states with governance vacuums.
4. Judicial Appointments : President appoints judges in
consultation with the Collegium.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Partisan Role : Governors often act as Centre’s agents (e.g.,
Maharashtra 2019).
2. Delay in Assent : Tactics to stall state legislation (e.g., Tamil
Nadu 2023).
3. Accountability Deficit : No impeachment process for
Governors.

---

Government Initiatives
1. Sarkaria Commission (1988) : Advised Governors to be
neutral and consult CMs.
2. Punchhi Commission (2010) : Recommended fixed tenure
(5 years) for Governors.

---

Relevance
1. Federalism Debates : Conflicts in states like Punjab and
Telangana over Governor’s role.
2. Judicial Interventions : Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling against
Governors’ indefinite bill withholding.

---

Way Forward
1. Neutral Appointments : Select Governors via bipartisan
committee.
2. Time-Bound Decisions : Mandate bill assent/rejection within
30 days.
3. Impeachment Mechanism : Allow state legislatures to recall
Governors.

---

Conclusion
The President and Governor must transcend partisan politics to
uphold constitutional morality. Reforms ensuring neutrality will
strengthen federalism.
---

3. Fundamental Rights vs Directive Principles

Intro/Quote :
“The Constitution is a blend of justiciable rights and non-
justiciable aspirations.” — Granville Austin

---

Data/Facts
1. Fundamental Rights (FRs) : Enforceable under Articles 12–
35 (e.g., Right to Equality, Free Speech).
2. Directive Principles (DPSPs) : Non-justiciable ideals under
Articles 36–51 (e.g., living wage, village panchayats).
3. Conflict Resolution : Article 31C prioritizes DPSPs over FRs
if linked to Article 39(b)-(c).
4. Landmark Cases : Minerva Mills (1980) declared FRs and
DPSPs complementary.

---

Recent Examples
1. EWS Quota (103rd Amendment) : Upheld in 2022,
balancing equality (Article 14) and welfare (Article 46).
2. Farm Laws (2020) : Struck down for violating farmers’
rights (Article 21) and ignoring DPSPs (Article 48).
---

Main Body/Positives
1. Rights Protection : FRs shield individuals from state
excesses (e.g., Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India ).
2. Welfare Guidance : DPSPs inspired MGNREGA, Right to
Education Act.
3. Judicial Harmony : Courts balance FRs and DPSPs (e.g.,
Vishaka Guidelines for workplace safety).

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Policy Conflicts : Land acquisition laws often face FRs-
DPSPs tussles.
2. Non-Justiciability : DPSPs lack enforcement mechanisms
(e.g., Uniform Civil Code).
3. Resource Constraints : States cite fiscal limits to ignore
DPSPs (e.g., healthcare under Article 47).

---

Government Initiatives
1. Right to Education Act (2009) : Operationalized Article 21A
(FR) and Article 45 (DPSP).
2. MGNREGA (2005) : Aligns with Article 41 (right to work).

---
 Relevance
1. Social Justice : Affirmative action (Article 15) and EWS
quota reflect FR-DPSP synergy.
2. Environmental Rights : MC Mehta v. Union of India linked
Article 21 (FR) with Article 48A (DPSP).

---

Way Forward
1. Legislative Clarity : Align laws with both FRs and DPSPs.
2. Financial Devolution : Increase state funds to implement
DPSPs.
3. Public Interest Litigations : Use courts to enforce DPSPs
through FRs.

---

Conclusion
FRs and DPSPs are two sides of India’s constitutional coin. Their
harmonious implementation ensures liberty with social justice.

---

4. Panchayati Raj Institutions

Intro/Quote :
“The voice of the people is the voice of God.” — Mahatma
Gandhi
---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Status : 73rd Amendment (1992) added Part
IX (Articles 243–243O).
2. Three-Tier System : Gram Panchayat (village), Panchayat
Samiti (block), Zila Parishad (district).
3. Reservations : 33% seats for women, SC/STs in proportion
to population.
4. Financial Devolution : States allocate 1–2% of budgets to
PRIs (NITI Aayog, 2023).

---

Recent Examples
1. Bihar Caste Survey (2023) : Panchayats facilitated data
collection for welfare schemes.
2. Kerala’s “People’s Plan” : PRIs allocated 40% of state funds
for local projects.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Grassroots Democracy : 3.2 million elected
representatives, 50% women.
2. Local Governance : PRIs manage 29 subjects (Eleventh
Schedule), including health and education.
3. Social Inclusion : SC/ST representatives increased from
15% (2000) to 25% (2023).
4. Transparency : Social audits in Andhra Pradesh reduced
corruption by 30% (CAG, 2022).

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Fund Crunch : Only 20% PRIs receive timely funds (Ministry
of Panchayati Raj).
2. Bureaucratic Control : State officials dominate decision-
making.
3. Capacity Gaps : 60% PRI members lack training in
governance (UNDP Report, 2021).

---

Government Initiatives
1. e-Gram Swaraj Portal : Digitizes fund tracking and project
monitoring.
2. SVAMITVA Scheme : Provides land titles to villagers,
empowering PRIs in resource management.

---

Relevance
1. SDG Localization : PRIs crucial for achieving goals like clean
water and sanitation.
2. Women Empowerment : 1.4 million women lead
Panchayats, transforming rural governance.

---

Way Forward
1. Financial Autonomy : Guarantee 30% state funds to PRIs.
2. Capacity Building : National Institute of Rural Development
(NIRD) training mandates.
3. Tech Integration : Use AI for real-time grievance redressal.

---

Conclusion
Panchayati Raj embodies India’s democratic ethos. Empowering
PRIs fiscally and administratively will unlock rural potential.

---

5. Uniform Civil Code (UCC)

Intro/Quote :
“A UCC is essential to national integration but must respect
diversity.” — B.R. Ambedkar

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Mandate : Article 44 directs the state to
secure a UCC.
2. Goa’s Model : Follows Portuguese Civil Code (1867) with
uniform laws on marriage and inheritance.
3. Law Commission (2018) : Recommended gradual UCC
implementation after public consultation.
4. Global Precedent : 160+ countries, including France and
Turkey, have uniform civil laws.

---

Recent Examples
1. Uttarakhand UCC (2024) : Banned polygamy, standardized
marriage age, and inheritance rights.
2. Supreme Court (2022) : Urged UCC to end religion-based
discrimination in Joshi v. Union of India .

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Gender Justice : Ends discriminatory practices (e.g., triple
talaq, polygamy).
2. National Unity : Bridges communal divides through
common laws.
3. Legal Simplicity : Reduces litigation in personal matters
(e.g., property disputes).
4. Global Alignment : Matches UN conventions on equality
and non-discrimination.
---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Religious Opposition : Minority communities fear cultural
erosion.
2. Political Tool : Often politicized to polarize voters (e.g.,
2024 election campaigns).
3. Implementation Hurdles : Diverse customs complicate
uniform laws (e.g., tribal traditions).

---

Government Initiatives
1. Uttarakhand UCC : First state to adopt UCC, serving as a
pilot.
2. Law Commission Consultations : Held 75+ public meetings
(2023) to draft model code.

---

Relevance
1. Secularism Debate : Balances religious freedom (Article 25)
with equality (Article 14).
2. Women’s Rights : UCC could standardize progressive laws
like equal inheritance.

---
 Way Forward
1. Consensus Building : Engage religious leaders and civil
society.
2. Phased Implementation : Start with gender-just laws (e.g.,
marriage age, inheritance).
3. Regional Flexibility : Allow exemptions for tribal and
customary practices.

---

Conclusion
A sensitively drafted UCC can harmonize India’s diversity with
constitutional ideals of justice and equality.

---

1. Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs)

Intro/Quote :
“DPSPs are the conscience of the Constitution, guiding the
state towards socio-economic democracy.” — Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Articles 36–51 outline DPSPs, inspired
by the Irish Constitution.
2. Non-Justiciable : Not enforceable by courts but
fundamental to governance (Article 37).
3. 42nd Amendment (1976) : Added principles like
environmental protection (Article 48A) and worker participation
(Article 43A).
4. Key Categories : Socialist (e.g., Article 39), Gandhian (e.g.,
Article 40), and Liberal-Intellectual (e.g., Article 44).
5. Judicial Integration : Courts use DPSPs to interpret laws
(e.g., Unni Krishnan v. State of AP linked Article 21 with Article
45).
6. Global Influence : Similar to UN Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs).

---

Recent Examples
1. Gig Workers’ Welfare (2023) : Social security code aligns
with Article 43.
2. PM Poshan Abhiyan : Addresses child nutrition (Article 47).

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Welfare State Blueprint : Inspired MGNREGA (Article 41),
Right to Education (Article 45).
2. Environmental Protection : National Green Tribunal (NGT)
operationalizes Article 48A.
3. Gender Justice : Shakti Act (2023) reflects Article 44
(Uniform Civil Code).
4. Rural Empowerment : Panchayati Raj (Article 40)
decentralizes governance.
5. Health for All : Ayushman Bharat aligns with Article 47.
6. Balanced Federalism : Guides Centre-State cooperation
(e.g., GST Council).

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Non-Enforceability : States ignore DPSPs without
accountability (e.g., Article 46 for SC/ST education).
2. Resource Constraints : Limited funds for health (3% GDP)
and education (4.6% GDP).
3. Conflict with FRs : Land acquisition laws face FR-DPSP
clashes (e.g., Kesavananda Bharati ).
4. Outdated Provisions : Prohibition (Article 47) lacks public
support.
5. Political Tokenism : Used for populist schemes rather than
systemic change.

---

Government Initiatives
1. Food Security Act (2013) : Operationalizes Article 47.
2. National Education Policy (2020) : Aligns with Article 45.
3. Stand-Up India : Promotes entrepreneurship (Article 46).

---
 Relevance
1. SDG Alignment : DPSPs mirror global goals (e.g., zero
hunger, gender equality).
2. Judicial Activism : Courts invoke DPSPs to expand rights
(e.g., Vishaka Guidelines ).

---

Way Forward
1. Legally Binding Framework : Link DPSPs to budget
allocations.
2. State-Specific Index : Rank states on DPSP implementation.
3. Public Awareness : Include DPSPs in school curricula.
4. Judicial Accountability : Mandate periodic state reports to
courts.

---

Conclusion
DPSPs are India’s roadmap to equitable development. Bridging
the gap between policy and implementation will realize
Ambedkar’s vision of social democracy.

---

2. Fundamental Duties
Intro/Quote :
“Rights flow from duties well performed.” — Mahatma Gandhi

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Article 51A (42nd Amendment, 1976);
11 duties added via 86th Amendment (2002).
2. Inspiration : USSR Constitution; introduced during the
Emergency.
3. Key Duties : Respect national symbols, promote harmony,
protect environment (51A(g)).
4. Judicial Use : Cited in cases like Ranganath Mishra v. Union
of India (2003).
5. Global Context : Similar to civic duties in Japan and
Germany.

---

Recent Examples
1. COVID-19 : Duty to follow health protocols (Article 51A(j)).
2. Swachh Bharat Mission : Promotes duty to protect
environment (51A(g)).

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Civic Responsibility : Encourages active citizenship (e.g.,
voting).
2. National Unity : Duty to renounce practices derogatory to
women (51A(e)).
3. Environmental Stewardship : NGT rulings invoke 51A(g) for
conservation.
4. Education Drive : 86th Amendment made education a duty
(51A(k)).
5. Cultural Preservation : Protects heritage sites (51A(f)).
6. Judicial Reinforcement : Courts use duties to justify
restrictions on FRs.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Non-Justiciable : No penalties for non-compliance.
2. Low Awareness : 60% citizens unaware of duties (National
Survey, 2022).
3. Vague Language : Terms like “scientific temper” lack
clarity.
4. Political Neglect : Rarely emphasized in policy or education.

---

Government Initiatives
1. Constitution Day (26 November) : Promotes duty
awareness.
2. Fit India Movement : Aligns with 51A(h) (fitness ethos).
3. Digital Campaigns : MyGov quizzes on fundamental duties.
---

Relevance
1. Social Harmony : Vital in polarized climates (e.g., hate
speech cases).
2. Environmental Crisis : Duty 51A(g) supports climate action.

---

Way Forward
1. Legal Enforcement : Introduce fines for duty violations.
2. School Integration : Include duties in moral science
courses.
3. Public Campaigns : Leverage influencers for youth
engagement.

---

Conclusion
Fundamental Duties are the ethical backbone of citizenship.
Institutionalizing their practice will strengthen India’s
democratic fabric.

---

3. Role of the Election Commission

Intro/Quote :
 “The EC is the sentinel of free and fair elections.” — T.N.
Seshan

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Article 324 establishes EC as an
independent body.
2. Structure : Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) + 2 Election
Commissioners.
3. Key Powers : Model Code of Conduct (MCC), voter
registration, EVM oversight.
4. Global Standing : India’s EC praised for managing world’s
largest elections.
5. Voter Base : 968 million registered voters (2024), 67%
turnout in 2019.

---

Recent Examples
1. Electoral Bonds Ban (2024) : SC ruling enforced
transparency.
2. Remote Voting Pilots : Tested for migrant workers in Gujarat
(2023).

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Impartiality : Ensures level playing field (e.g., MCC
enforcement).
2. Innovation : Introduced VVPATs (2013), cVIGIL app (2019).
3. Voter Inclusion : Enrolled 18 million first-time voters in
2024.
4. Dispute Resolution : Adjudicates electoral malpractices
within 60 days.
5. Transparency : Publishes affidavits of candidates’
criminal/financial records.
6. Crisis Management : Conducted elections during COVID-19
(2021 state polls).

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Political Pressure : Allegations of bias (e.g., delayed action
against ruling parties).
2. Criminalization : 43% MPs face criminal charges (ADR,
2024).
3. Funding Opacity : Anonymous donations via electoral
bonds (pre-2024).
4. Tech Vulnerabilities : EVM tampering fears despite
safeguards.
5. Low Women’s Representation : Only 14% female MPs
(2024).

---

Government Initiatives
1. Electoral Bond Scheme : Scrapped in 2024 post-SC verdict.
2. Voter Helpline App : Resolved 12 million queries (2023).
3. National Voters’ Day : 25 January celebrations since 2011.

---

Relevance
1. Democratic Integrity : EC’s credibility impacts global
democracy indices.
2. Youth Engagement : 45% voters aged 18–35 (2024).

---

Way Forward
1. Statutory MCC : Make it legally binding.
2. State Funding : Implement Indrajit Gupta Committee
(1998) recommendations.
3. Gender Quotas : Reserve seats for women in legislatures.
4. Tech Upgrades : Blockchain for tamper-proof voting.

---

Conclusion
The EC must evolve with technological and societal changes to
maintain electoral integrity, ensuring India remains the “mother
of democracies.”
---

4. Judicial Activism vs Restraint

Intro/Quote :
“Judges must be lions under the throne, not mules carrying
burdens.” — Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer

---

Data/Facts
1. Judicial Activism : Proactive rulings addressing governance
gaps (e.g., Vishaka Guidelines ).
2. Judicial Restraint : Deference to legislature (e.g., Ashwini
Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India , 2023).
3. Constitutional Basis : Articles 32 (PILs) and 142 (complete
justice).
4. Landmark Cases :
- Activism: MC Mehta (environment), Navtej Johar (LGBTQ+
rights).
- Restraint: Kesavananda Bharati (Basic Structure).

---

Recent Examples
1. Climate Activism : SC’s 2023 directive to curb stubble
burning.
2. Restraint in UCC : SC refused to direct Parliament in 2024.
---

Main Body/Positives
1. Rights Expansion : PILs empowered marginalized groups
(e.g., transgender rights).
2. Policy Correction : Banned outdated laws (Section 377,
triple talaq).
3. Environmental Justice : Enforced pollution control (e.g.,
Odd-Even scheme).
4. Accountability : Monitored COVID-19 oxygen supply (2021).
5. Balanced Federalism : Resolved Centre-State disputes
(e.g., Delhi-Centre tussle).

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Overreach : Courts dictating policy (e.g., banning
firecrackers without alternatives).
2. Delayed Justice : 4.8 crore pending cases (NJDG, 2023).
3. Elitism : Urban-centric rulings neglect rural realities.
4. Political Backlash : Accusations of undermining elected
governments.

---

Government Initiatives
1. e-Courts Project : Digitized 18,000 courts (Phase III, 2023).
2. Mediation Act (2023) : Promotes out-of-court settlements.
---

Relevance
1. Democratic Check : Balances executive-legislative
excesses.
2. Social Justice : Ensures rights for minorities and vulnerable
groups.

---

Way Forward
1. Guidelines for PILs : Filter frivolous petitions.
2. Specialized Benches : Fast-track environmental, cyber
cases.
3. Judicial Training : Sensitize judges to socio-economic
realities.

---

Conclusion
Judicial activism and restraint are two sides of the same coin.
Striking a balance ensures courts protect rights without
overstepping democratic mandates.

---

5. Citizenship and CAA-NRC Debate

 Intro/Quote :
“Citizenship is the right to have rights.” — Hannah Arendt

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Articles 5–11 define citizenship;
Citizenship Act (1955) regulates it.
2. CAA (2019) : Fast-tracks citizenship for persecuted non-
Muslims from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan.
3. NRC : Implemented in Assam (2019), excluded 1.9 million
people.
4. Global Context : 27 million global refugees (UNHCR, 2023);
India hosts 250,000.

---

Recent Examples
1. CAA Protests (2020) : Nationwide demonstrations against
religious exclusion.
2. Assam NRC : Supreme Court-monitored process; 2019 final
list published.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Humanitarian Relief : CAA protects persecuted minorities
(e.g., Hindus, Sikhs).
2. National Security : NRC identifies illegal immigrants.
3. Legal Clarity : CAA amended Citizenship Act to address
specific cases.
4. Judicial Oversight : SC monitors NRC for fairness.
5. International Law Compliance : Non-refoulement principle
for refugees.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Religious Discrimination : CAA excludes Muslims, violating
Article 14.
2. Documentation Issues : NRC left many stateless (e.g.,
Assam’s “Doubtful Voters”).
3. Federal Resistance : States like Kerala and WB opposed
CAA.
4. Humanitarian Crisis : Detention camps in Assam house
3,000+ people.

---

Government Initiatives
1. CAA Rules (2024) : Notified for implementation after
delays.
2. National Population Register (NPR) : Precursor to
nationwide NRC.

---
 Relevance
1. Secularism Debate : Tests India’s commitment to equality
(Articles 14–15).
2. Global Image : CAA criticized by UNHRC and EU Parliament.

---

Way Forward
1. Inclusive Citizenship : Amend CAA to include all persecuted
groups.
2. Transparent NRC : Ensure due process and legal aid.
3. Refugee Policy : Enact law aligning with UN Refugee
Convention.

---

Conclusion
Citizenship laws must balance security with inclusivity. A
humane, non-discriminatory approach will uphold India’s
constitutional ethos.

---
6. Anti-Defection Law
Intro/Quote :
“The Anti-Defection Law is a shield against political
immorality.” — Former Speaker Somnath Chatterjee
---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Tenth Schedule added via the 52nd
Amendment (1985), amended by the 91st Amendment (2003).
2. Scope : Disqualifies MPs/MLAs for defection if they violate
party whip or voluntarily resign.
3. Exceptions : Allows mergers if 2/3rd of a party’s members
agree.
4. Judicial Review : Speaker’s decisions subject to Supreme
Court scrutiny ( Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu , 1992).
5. Global Context : Rare globally; UK and US rely on party
discipline, not legal bans.
6. Recent Amendments : 91st Amendment barred defectors
from ministerial posts.

---

Recent Examples
1. Maharashtra (2022) : Eknath Shinde faction split Shiv Sena;
Speaker delayed disqualification.
2. Manipur (2023) : 7 MLAs defected to BJP, triggering
political instability.
3. Telangana (2024) : Congress MLAs defected to BRS,
challenged under Tenth Schedule.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Stability : Prevents mid-term collapses of governments
(e.g., 1980s instability).
2. Party Discipline : Ensures loyalty to electoral mandates.
3. Judicial Safeguards : SC’s intervention in Nabam Rebia
(2016) curbed Speaker bias.
4. Ethical Governance : Reduces “horse-trading” and
corruption.
5. Public Trust : Upholds voter expectations of elected
representatives.
6. Federal Balance : Applies uniformly to states and Centre.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Speaker Bias : Partisan delays in disqualification (e.g.,
Maharashtra 2022).
2. Merger Loophole : Encourages bulk defections under the
guise of mergers.
3. No Time Limit : Speaker’s indefinite delays undermine law’s
purpose.
4. Undermines Dissent : Suppresses intra-party democracy
and constructive criticism.
5. Judicial Burden : Courts overburdened with appeals against
Speakers’ decisions.
6. Lack of Awareness : Voters remain uninformed about
defection consequences.

---
 Government Initiatives
1. 91st Amendment (2003) : Barred defectors from becoming
ministers.
2. Law Commission (2015) : Recommended independent
tribunal to replace Speaker’s role.
3. SC Directives (2023) : Mandated time-bound decisions on
disqualifications.

---

Relevance
1. Political Integrity : Critical in hung assemblies (e.g., Goa,
Karnataka).
2. Democratic Accountability : Ensures elected
representatives honor voter mandates.

---

Way Forward
1. Independent Tribunal : Replace Speaker with a neutral body
for disqualifications.
2. Time-Bound Resolutions : Mandate decisions within 30
days.
3. Merger Clause Reform : Require at least 50% of party
support for mergers.
4. Public Transparency : Publish disqualification proceedings
online.

---
 Conclusion
The Anti-Defection Law needs urgent reforms to curb political
opportunism while preserving democratic dissent. A non-
partisan mechanism will restore public faith in representative
democracy.

---

7. Right to Information (RTI) Act

Intro/Quote :
“RTI is the master key to good governance.” — Aruna Roy

---

Data/Facts
1. Enactment : Passed in 2005, operationalized under Article
19(1)(a) (right to free speech).
2. Structure : Central/State Information Commissions
(CIC/SIC) adjudicate appeals.
3. Usage : Over 6 million RTI applications filed annually; 30%
related to corruption (CIC, 2023).
4. Global Recognition : Ranked 6th globally in RTI
effectiveness (Global Right to Information Rating).
5. Amendments : RTI Amendment Act (2019) diluted
commissioners’ autonomy by altering tenure.

---
 Recent Examples
1. Electoral Bonds (2024) : RTI disclosures revealed corporate-
political funding links.
2. PM-CARES Fund : SC upheld non-disclosure under RTI,
citing “public interest.”
3. Adani-Hindenburg Case : RTI exposed SEBI’s regulatory
lapses.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Transparency : Exposed scams like 2G, Commonwealth
Games.
2. Empowerment : Enabled marginalized groups to access
welfare schemes (e.g., MGNREGA).
3. Accountability : Forced bureaucrats to disclose asset
details.
4. Judicial Support : SC expanded RTI scope to include CJI’s
office (2019).
5. Innovation : Online portals (RTI Online) simplified filing.
6. Global Model : Inspired similar laws in Afghanistan and
Rwanda.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Attacks on Activists : 100+ RTI users killed since 2005
(Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative).
2. Pending Appeals : 2.8 lakh cases pending in CIC/SICs
(2023).
3. Exemptions Misuse : Section 8(1) invoked to deny
information (e.g., Rafale deal).
4. Bureaucratic Resistance : 40% applications met with delays
or denials.
5. Digital Divide : Rural applicants struggle with online
processes.

---

Government Initiatives
1. RTI Online Portal : 95% of applications filed digitally (2023).
2. Proactive Disclosure : Ministries publish budgets, policies
online.
3. Whistleblower Protection : Draft Bill pending since 2015.

---

Relevance
1. Democratic Health : Vital for participatory governance and
curbing corruption.
2. Crisis Management : Used to track COVID-19 fund usage
and vaccine distribution.

---

Way Forward
1. Strengthen CIC/SICs : Fill vacancies and ensure timely
hearings.
2. Whistleblower Law : Enact protection for RTI users.
3. Awareness Drives : Integrate RTI in school curricula and
rural literacy programs.
4. Penalize Delays : Fine officials for non-compliance.

---

Conclusion
The RTI Act remains a cornerstone of Indian democracy.
Protecting activists and modernizing processes will ensure it
continues to empower citizens.

---

8. Lokpal and Lokayuktas

Intro/Quote :
“Corruption is like a ball of snow; once it starts rolling, it must
increase.” — C. Rajagopalachari

---

Data/Facts
1. Legal Basis : Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act (2013); amended
in 2016.
2. Jurisdiction : Covers PM, MPs, bureaucrats, and NGOs
receiving government funds.
3. Appointments : President appoints Lokpal based on PM-led
committee’s recommendations.
4. State Counterparts : 20 states have active Lokayuktas;
Bihar and West Bengal lag.
5. First Lokpal : Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose appointed in
2019.

---

Recent Examples
1. Lokpal’s Inactivity : Only 5% of 1,200 complaints acted
upon (2023 report).
2. Maharashtra Lokayukta : Exposed irrigation scam worth
₹70,000 crore (2022).
3. Kerala Lokayukta : Ruled against CM’s office in nepotism
case (2023).

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Anti-Corruption : Empowered citizens to report graft
directly.
2. Judicial Independence : Lokpal members enjoy security of
tenure.
3. Public Trust : 65% citizens support Lokpal’s role
(Transparency International, 2023).
4. Comprehensive Scope : Covers NGOs and private entities
funded by government.
5. State Success : Karnataka Lokayukta recovered ₹500 crore
in 2022–23.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Vacancies : Lokpal’s 8-member bench has 4 vacancies
(2024).
2. Bureaucratic Delays : CBI/ED often slow to investigate
Lokpal referrals.
3. Limited Awareness : 70% rural population unaware of
Lokpal (NGO survey).
4. Political Interference : Reluctance to probe high-profile
leaders.

---

Government Initiatives
1. Lokpal Search Committee : Reconstituted in 2023 to fill
vacancies.
2. Digital Complaints : Online portal operational since 2020.
3. Awareness Campaigns : “Lokpal Prahari” initiative in
schools.

---

Relevance
1. Corruption Perception Index : India ranked 85th (2023);
Lokpal critical for improvement.
2. Judicial Backing : SC directives forced appointment delays
to be addressed.

---

Way Forward
1. Autonomous Staffing : Let Lokpal hire independent
investigators.
2. Mandatory Reporting : Require annual Lokpal reports in
Parliament.
3. State Compliance : Penalize states without Lokayuktas.
4. Tech Integration : AI tools to prioritize high-impact cases.

---

Conclusion
The Lokpal’s potential remains untapped. Filling vacancies and
ensuring autonomy can transform it into a corruption watchdog.

---

9. Constitutional Amendments (42nd, 44th, 103rd)

Intro/Quote :
“A Constitution is not a mere legal document; it is the soul of a
nation.” — Granville Austin
---

Data/Facts
1. 42nd Amendment (1976) :
- Added “Socialist,” “Secular” to Preamble.
- Curtailed judicial review; expanded Centre’s powers.
2. 44th Amendment (1978) :
- Restored judicial review post-Emergency.
- Made President’s Rule subject to parliamentary approval.
3. 103rd Amendment (2019) :
- Introduced 10% EWS quota for economically weaker upper
castes.
- Challenged in SC ( Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India ).

---

Recent Examples
1. EWS Quota : SC upheld 103rd Amendment in 2022 but
excluded SC/STs from its scope.
2. Secularism Debate : 42nd Amendment’s “secular” term
invoked in Hijab ban case (2022).

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Social Justice : 103rd Amendment addressed economic
inequality.
2. Democratic Restoration : 44th Amendment reversed
Emergency-era overreach.
3. Federal Clarity : 42nd Amendment clarified Centre’s
dominance in emergencies.
4. Judicial Revival : 44th Amendment empowered courts to
review President’s Rule.
5. Inclusive Growth : EWS quota extended reservations
beyond caste lines.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Political Misuse : 42nd Amendment abused to centralize
power during Emergency.
2. Judicial Backlash : SC struck down parts of 42nd (e.g.,
Article 368 expansion).
3. Caste vs Class : 103rd Amendment criticized for ignoring
caste-based deprivation.
4. Ambiguity : “Economic weakness” criteria in EWS quota
lack clarity.

---

Government Initiatives
1. Constitutional Reviews : NDA’s push for “One Nation, One
Election” via amendment.
2. EWS Implementation : 1.5 lakh beneficiaries in central jobs
(2023).
---

Relevance
1. Reservation Policy : EWS quota redefined affirmative action
in India.
2. Federal Tensions : 44th Amendment’s safeguards tested in
states like Maharashtra.

---

Way Forward
1. Periodic Review : National Commission to assess
amendment impacts.
2. Public Consultation : Pre-legislative debates for future
amendments.
3. Clarity in Laws : Define “economic weakness” for EWS
transparency.

---

Conclusion
Constitutional amendments must balance societal evolution
with foundational values. Inclusive dialogue ensures
amendments reflect “We the People.”

---

10. Role of Pressure Groups in Indian Democracy

 Intro/Quote :
“Pressure groups are the invisible hands that shape visible
policies.” — Robert Dahl

---

Data/Facts
1. Types : Business (FICCI), agrarian (AIKS), NGOs (Amnesty),
and ideological (RSS).
2. Legal Framework : FCRA regulates foreign-funded NGOs;
22,000+ registered.
3. Impact : 30% environmental laws influenced by groups like
Greenpeace.
4. Global Context : India ranked 46th in Civic Participation
Index (2023).

---

Recent Examples
1. Farmers’ Protests (2020–21) : Samyukt Kisan Morcha forced
repeal of farm laws.
2. NRC-CAA Protests : Student groups like JNUSU led
nationwide demonstrations.
3. Digital Advocacy : Internet Freedom Foundation challenged
IT Rules (2021).

---
 Main Body/Positives
1. Policy Influence : FICCI shaped GST and labor reforms.
2. Grassroots Mobilization : Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan
(MKSS) pioneered RTI.
3. Social Justice : Narmada Bachao Andolan highlighted
displacement issues.
4. Checks and Balances : NGOs like PRS Legislative track
parliamentary performance.
5. Global Advocacy : India’s climate policies influenced by
global NGOs.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Elite Capture : Corporate lobbies dilute pro-poor policies.
2. FCRA Crackdown : 6,000 NGOs lost licenses since 2014
(MHA data).
3. Violence : Activists like Gauri Lankesh murdered for
dissent.
4. Transparency Issues : 40% NGOs fail to disclose funding
sources.

---

Government Initiatives
1. DARPG Portal : Mandates NGO disclosures for transparency.
2. NITI Aayog Partnerships : Collaborates with NGOs for SDGs.
---

Relevance
1. Democratic Depth : Amplifies marginalized voices (e.g.,
tribal rights).
2. Policy Innovation : Pressure groups propose laws like
Disability Rights Act.

---

Way Forward
1. Regulatory Balance : Simplify FCRA without stifling dissent.
2. Public Funding : State grants for non-partisan NGOs.
3. Safety Mechanisms : Protect activists through witness
protection laws.

---

Conclusion
Pressure groups are vital for a vibrant democracy. Balancing
regulation with freedom will harness their potential for inclusive
growth.

---
11. Judicial Review
Intro/Quote :
“Judicial review is the shield of the Constitution against
legislative and executive excesses.” — Justice H.R. Khanna
---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Articles 13 (invalidating laws violating
FRs), 32 (SC’s writ jurisdiction), and 226 (HCs’ writ powers).
2. Landmark Cases :
- Kesavananda Bharati (1973) : Established Basic Structure
Doctrine.
- Shankari Prasad (1951) : Affirmed Parliament’s amendment
power.
3. Global Influence : Borrowed from U.S. Marbury v. Madison
(1803); adapted to Indian federalism.
4. Scope : Covers legislative, executive actions, and
constitutional amendments.
5. Frequency : SC struck down 1,000+ laws since 1950; 150+
post-2010 (NLSIU Report, 2023).
6. Judicial Trends : Environmental PILs rose by 40% in 2023
(NGT data).

---

Recent Examples
1. Electoral Bonds (2024) : SC invalidated scheme for
violating Article 19(1)(a).
2. Same-Sex Marriage (2023) : SC deferred to Parliament but
affirmed LGBTQ+ rights under Article 21.
3. J&K Abrogation (2023) : Upheld Article 370 revocation but
mandated statehood restoration.
---

Main Body/Positives
1. Constitutional Supremacy : Ensures laws align with
constitutional ethos.
2. Rights Protection : Struck down Section 377 (IPC) and
AFSPA excesses.
3. Federal Balance : Resolved inter-state disputes (e.g.,
Cauvery water sharing).
4. Environmental Justice : Enforced climate commitments
(e.g., coal mining bans).
5. Curbing Arbitrariness : Nullified arbitrary internet
shutdowns (Article 19).
6. Democratic Check : Blocked attempts to undermine RTI and
election integrity.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Overreach Allegations : Courts accused of policymaking
(e.g., banning firecrackers).
2. Delayed Justice : Average 15-year pendency for
constitutional challenges (NJDG, 2023).
3. Elitist Perception : Rural litigants struggle to access courts
(only 25% cases from villages).
4. Political Backlash : Executive criticism of “judicial activism”
(e.g., NJAC ruling).
5. Resource Strain : Judges handle 4,000+ cases annually,
impacting review quality.

---

Government Initiatives
1. 99th Amendment (2014) : NJAC Act (struck down in 2015).
2. e-Courts Mission Mode Project : Digitized 18,000 courts to
expedite cases.
3. Law Commission Reports : Recommended time-bound
disposal of constitutional matters.

---

Relevance
1. Democratic Safeguard : Critical amid rising executive
centralization.
2. Global Standing : India’s judicial review cited in Nepal and
South African constitutions.

---

Way Forward
1. Specialized Benches : Dedicate SC/HC benches for
constitutional matters.
2. Time Limits : Resolve judicial review petitions within 6
months.
3. Public Awareness : Simplify legal language in judgments for
citizen access.
4. Judicial Training : Sensitize judges to socio-economic
realities in rural India.

---

Conclusion
Judicial review is the bedrock of constitutional democracy.
Balancing proactive oversight with restraint will preserve its
legitimacy as the “guardian of the Constitution.”

---

12. Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

Intro/Quote :
“PIL is the legal weapon of the powerless against the
powerful.” — Justice P.N. Bhagwati

---

Data/Facts
1. Origin : Introduced in Hussainara Khatoon (1979) ;
expanded in S.P. Gupta (1981) .
2. Constitutional Basis : Article 32 and 226; relaxed locus
standi rules.
3. Scope : Covers human rights, environment, corruption, and
governance failures.
4. Impact : 60% environmental laws shaped by PILs (CPR,
2023).
5. Global Recognition : UNHRC lauded PILs for advancing
social justice.

---

Recent Examples
1. Climate Justice (2023) : PILs enforced air quality norms in
Delhi-NCR.
2. Migrant Workers (2020) : SC directed food and transport
during COVID-19.
3. Electoral Reforms (2024) : PILs challenged opaque political
funding.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Empowerment : Enabled marginalized groups (e.g.,
LGBTQ+, tribals) to access justice.
2. Policy Influence : Vishaka Guidelines (1997) mandated
workplace sexual harassment laws.
3. Environmental Protection : MC Mehta cases closed
polluting industries in Taj Trapezium.
4. Accountability : Exposed scams like 2G, Coalgate.
5. Judicial Innovation : Introduced compensatory
jurisprudence (e.g., Bhopal Gas Tragedy).
6. Global Model : Inspired “social action litigation” in
Bangladesh and Nepal.
---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Frivolous Petitions : 30% PILs termed “publicity litigation”
(SC, 2023).
2. Urban Bias : 80% PILs filed in metros; rural issues
underrepresented.
3. Executive Pushback : Governments accuse courts of
overstepping (e.g., farm laws stay).
4. Implementation Gaps : Orders often ignored (e.g.,
groundwater regulation).

---

Government Initiatives
1. PIL Guidelines (2013) : SC mandated prima facie case
verification.
2. NALSA : Provides free legal aid to PIL petitioners.
3. E-Courts Integration : Online PIL filing in 15 HCs.

---

Relevance
1. Social Justice : Key tool for Dalits, Adivasis, and women.
2. Crisis Response : PILs addressed COVID-19
mismanagement and migrant distress.
---

Way Forward
1. Pre-Screening Committees : Filter non-serious PILs at filing
stage.
2. Rural Outreach : Mobile courts and legal camps to
encourage grassroots PILs.
3. AI Tools : Prioritize PILs based on urgency and impact.

---

Conclusion
PILs democratize justice but need reforms to curb misuse. A
balanced approach will retain their transformative potential
while respecting institutional boundaries.

---

13. Separation of Powers

Intro/Quote :
“The separation of powers is the foundation of liberty.” —
Montesquieu

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Articles 50 (judicial independence),
121–122 (parliamentary privileges), and 361 (presidential
immunity).
2. Judicial Interpretation : Ram Jawaya Kapur (1955) affirmed
functional separation.
3. Global Context : India’s model blends U.S. checks and
balances with British parliamentary traditions.
4. Key Conflicts : NJAC Act (2015), Office of Profit
disqualifications.
5. Recent Trends : Executive dominance in appointments
(e.g., EC, CBI Director).

---

Recent Examples
1. Farm Laws (2020) : SC stayed laws, citing inadequate
parliamentary debate.
2. Delhi-Centre Tussle (2023) : SC ruled in favor of elected
government’s autonomy.
3. CEC Appointment (2023) : SC mandated PM-CJI-LoP
committee for transparency.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Checks and Balances : Prevents concentration of power
(e.g., Basic Structure Doctrine).
2. Judicial Independence : Collegium shields judges from
executive interference.
3. Legislative Oversight : PAC, JPC scrutinize executive
actions.
4. Executive Accountability : President’s Rule subject to
judicial review ( Bommai ).
5. Federal Balance : States challenge central overreach (e.g.,
GST Council disputes).
6. Global Benchmark : Cited in South Africa’s post-apartheid
constitution.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Executive Overreach : Ordinance misuse (e.g., 80+
ordinances in 2020).
2. Judicial Overreach : Policy directives on air quality, COVID
management.
3. Legislative Weakness : 60% bills passed without debate
(PRS, 2023).
4. Partisan Governors : Undermine state autonomy (e.g.,
Tamil Nadu, 2023).

---

Government Initiatives
1. NITI Aayog (2015) : Replaced Planning Commission to
foster cooperative federalism.
2. National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) : Promotes transparency
in judiciary.
---

Relevance
1. Democratic Health : Critical amid debates on “elected
dictatorship.”
2. Institutional Trust : 55% Indians distrust executive (Lokniti-
CSDS, 2023).

---

Way Forward
1. Strengthen Parliament : Mandate pre-legislative impact
assessments.
2. Governor Reforms : Fixed tenure and bipartisan
appointments.
3. Judicial Restraint : Limit policy directives to constitutional
violations.

---

Conclusion
Separation of powers is India’s constitutional compass.
Strengthening institutional autonomy and accountability will
safeguard democracy from authoritarian drift.

---

14. Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha: Functions and Issues

 Intro/Quote :
“Parliament is the temple of democracy, and its committees
are the pillars.” — G.V. Mavalankar

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis :
- Lok Sabha : Lower House (Article 81), 543 directly elected
members.
- Rajya Sabha : Upper House (Article 80), 238 members
elected by state legislatures.
2. Legislative Roles :
- Lok Sabha : Primacy in money bills (Article 110), no-
confidence motions.
- Rajya Sabha : Represents states, reviews non-money bills,
and can delay legislation.
3. Productivity : Lok Sabha functioned for 85% of scheduled
time in 2023; Rajya Sabha at 78% (PRS).
4. Women’s Representation : 15% in Lok Sabha (2024), 12%
in Rajya Sabha.
5. Global Comparison : India’s bicameral system inspired by
UK’s Parliament but tailored for federalism.

---

Recent Examples
1. Farm Laws Repeal (2021) : Lok Sabha passed repeal bill in
10 minutes without debate.
2. Criminal Code Bills (2023) : Replaced IPC, CrPC, and
Evidence Act amid opposition walkouts.
3. Rajya Sabha Deadlock : 2023 Maharashtra MLAs’
disqualification case delayed legislative business.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Legislative Scrutiny : Standing committees review 60% of
bills (e.g., Data Protection Bill).
2. Federal Balance : Rajya Sabha ensures state interests in
national laws (e.g., GST Council).
3. Checks on Executive : Question Hour exposed irregularities
in PM-CARES fund.
4. Representation : Lok Sabha mirrors public mandate; Rajya
Sabha provides continuity.
5. Constitutional Amendments : Requires dual majority (Lok
Sabha + 50% states).
6. Crisis Management : Passed pandemic relief packages
worth ₹20 lakh crore (2020–21).

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Disruptions : 40% of Lok Sabha time lost to adjournments
(2023 monsoon session).
2. Ordinance Overuse : 27 ordinances in 2023, bypassing
parliamentary debate.
3. Criminalization : 29% of MPs face serious criminal charges
(ADR, 2024).
4. Centralization : Money bill misuse (e.g., Aadhaar Act, 2016)
undermines Rajya Sabha.
5. Gender Imbalance : Women’s reservation bill pending since
2008.

---

Government Initiatives
1. New Parliament Building : Enhanced seating and tech
infrastructure (2023).
2. National e-Vidhan Application (NeVA) : Digitized legislative
processes in 18 states.
3. Youth Parliament : Encourages student participation in
mock debates.

---

Relevance
1. Democratic Accountability : Ensures executive
answerability through no-confidence motions.
2. Global Image : Reflects India’s commitment to federalism
and debate-driven governance.

---

Way Forward
1. Mandatory Sittings : Fix 100 days/year for Lok Sabha, 75
for Rajya Sabha.
2. Committee Strengthening : Refer all bills to committees for
scrutiny.
3. Anti-Defection Law Reform : Penalize disruptive MPs.
4. Gender Quotas : Fast-track Women’s Reservation Bill
implementation.

---

Conclusion
The Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha embody India’s democratic
ethos. Strengthening parliamentary norms and inclusivity will
uphold their role as the “people’s voice.”

---

15. Role of Media in Democracy

Intro/Quote :
“A free press is the unsleeping guardian of democracy.” — Dr.
B.R. Ambedkar

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Article 19(1)(a) guarantees freedom
of speech and expression.
2. Media Reach : 1.2 lakh newspapers, 900+ TV channels,
and 500 million social media users (2024).
3. Press Freedom Index : India ranked 161/180 (Reporters
Without Borders, 2024).
4. Regulatory Laws : IT Rules (2021), Cable TV Act (1995), and
Press Council Act (1978).
5. Digital Growth : 80 crore internet users; 60% consume
news via WhatsApp.

---

Recent Examples
1. Pegasus Scandal (2021) : Alleged surveillance of journalists
and activists.
2. IT Rules (2021) : Mandated grievance redressal and fact-
checking units.
3. Farm Protest Coverage : Media polarized between “anti-
national” and “pro-farmer” narratives.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Watchdog Role : Exposed scams (2G, Rafale) and held
power accountable.
2. Public Awareness : COVID-19 updates and vaccination
drives reached rural India.
3. Grassroots Journalism : Platforms like Khabar Lahariya
empower rural women reporters.
4. Judicial Impact : PILs based on investigative reports (e.g.,
NRC discrepancies).
5. Cultural Integration : Promotes linguistic diversity (e.g., 22
scheduled languages in AIR broadcasts).
6. Global Influence : Indian media shapes diaspora
perspectives worldwide.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Fake News : 60% of Indians encounter misinformation
weekly (Reuters Institute, 2023).
2. Paid Media : “Cash-for-news” scandals undermine
credibility.
3. Censorship : Sedition charges against journalists (e.g.,
Siddique Kappan).
4. Corporate Control : 80% media owned by 5 conglomerates
(Narendra Modi, Adani groups).
5. Safety Risks : 15 journalists killed since 2020 (Committee
to Protect Journalists).

---

Government Initiatives
1. PIB Fact Check Unit : Flags fake news on government
policies.
2. Digital News India : Launched to counter foreign media
dominance.
3. Journalist Welfare Scheme : Compensates families of
journalists killed on duty.

---

Relevance
1. Election Integrity : Media shapes voter opinions; 70% rely
on TV debates (CSDS-Lokniti).
2. Social Cohesion : Counters hate speech and promotes
communal harmony.

---

Way Forward
1. Self-Regulation : Strengthen bodies like NBA and NBSA for
ethical reporting.
2. Media Literacy : Integrate critical thinking in school
curricula.
3. Diversify Ownership : Cap media ownership to prevent
monopolies.
4. Protection Laws : Enact a Journalist Protection Act.

---

Conclusion
Media is democracy’s fourth pillar. Ensuring its independence
and ethical standards will fortify India’s democratic fabric
against disinformation and authoritarianism.
---

16. Women’s Reservation in Legislatures

Intro/Quote :
“Women’s empowerment begins with their representation.” —
Indira Gandhi

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : 106th Amendment (2023) reserves
33% seats in Lok Sabha and state assemblies.
2. Current Representation : 15% women in Lok Sabha (2024),
below global average of 26% (IPU, 2023).
3. State Performance : Bihar (13%) and West Bengal (14%)
lag; Chhattisgarh leads (19%).
4. Global Models : Rwanda (61%), South Africa (46%), and
Nepal (33%) outperform India.
5. Historical Context : Women’s reservation bill pending for 27
years before 2023 passage.

---

Recent Examples
1. 106th Amendment (2023) : Passed with bipartisan support
after decades of debate.
2. Panchayati Raj : 45% women representatives in local
bodies (2023).
3. Election Trends : 8 states elected women CMs (e.g.,
Mamata Banerjee, Draupadi Murmu).

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Gender Equality : Aligns with SDG 5 and Article 15(3)
(special provisions for women).
2. Policy Outcomes : Women-led panchayats prioritize
education and health (NITI Aayog).
3. Role Models : Indira Gandhi, Pratibha Patil, and Droupadi
Murmu inspire future generations.
4. Legislative Impact : Women MPs sponsor 20% more bills on
health and education (PRS).
5. Social Change : Reduces gender-based violence through
awareness and legal reforms.

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Delayed Implementation : Reservation effective post-2029
delimitation, delaying equity.
2. Tokenism : “Proxy culture” in panchayats where male
relatives control women representatives.
3. Patriarchal Resistance : 40% male MPs opposed reservation
(Lok Sabha debates, 2023).
4. Intersectionality : Dalit and tribal women face dual
discrimination in candidacy.

---

Government Initiatives
1. Beti Bachao Beti Padhao : Improved female literacy (77% in
2024 vs 65% in 2011).
2. Mahila Shakti Kendra : Provides skill training to women
leaders in 115 districts.
3. Nari Shakti Vandan Act (2023) : Legal framework for 33%
reservation.

---

Relevance
1. Demographic Dividend : 48% female population; their
participation boosts GDP.
2. Global Commitments : CEDAW (1979) mandates gender
parity in public life.

---

Way Forward
1. Immediate Implementation : Remove delimitation clause to
activate reservation.
2. Internal Party Quotas : Reserve 33% tickets for women in
all parties.
3. Awareness Campaigns : Highlight success stories like
Chhavi Rajawat (Sarpanch).

---

Conclusion
Women’s reservation is a milestone, but its true success lies in
transforming political culture to value women’s leadership
beyond tokenism.

---

17. Tribal Rights and Fifth Schedule

Intro/Quote :
“Tribal rights are not concessions; they are the recognition of
historical justice.” — Dr. B.D. Sharma

---

Data/Facts
1. Constitutional Basis : Fifth Schedule (Article 244) governs
tribal areas in 10 states.
2. Demographics : 8.6% tribal population (104 million); 75%
live in Fifth Schedule areas.
3. Legal Framework : PESA Act (1996), Forest Rights Act
(2006), and Land Acquisition Act (2013).
4. Land Conflicts : 25% of India’s districts report tribal land
disputes (Land Conflict Watch, 2023).
5. Development Indicators : 45% STs below poverty line;
literacy rate 59% (NSSO, 2023).

---

Recent Examples
1. Jharkhand Land Acquisition : Protests against Adivasi land
takeover for coal mining (2023).
2. Hasdeo Aranya Movement : Tribals opposed deforestation
for mining in Chhattisgarh.
3. Bastar Killings : Security forces’ alleged fake encounters
sparked national outrage (2023).

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Autonomy : Fifth Schedule mandates Tribal Advisory
Councils for self-governance.
2. Forest Rights Act (FRA) : Recognized community forest
resource rights for 2.5 lakh villages.
3. Cultural Preservation : Protects tribal languages, traditions,
and religious practices.
4. Legal Recourse : NHRC and SC interventions in cases like
Niyamgiri Hills (2013).
5. Development Schemes : Eklavya schools, Van Dhan Vikas
Kendras for tribal upliftment.

---
 Challenges/Negatives
1. Land Alienation : 50% FRA claims rejected (MoTA, 2023);
corporate mining displaces tribals.
2. Violence : 150+ tribal activists killed since 2010 (Global
Witness Report).
3. Bureaucratic Apathy : 60% tribal welfare funds unutilized
(CAG, 2022).
4. Assimilation Pressures : Loss of cultural identity due to
urbanization and education policies.

---

Government Initiatives
1. Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana : Holistic development in 27
tribal-dominated states.
2. Digital Empowerment : Digital literacy camps in 50,000
tribal villages.
3. TRIFED : Markets tribal handicrafts via Tribes India outlets.

---

Relevance
1. Environmental Justice : Tribals protect 60% of India’s
forests; critical for climate goals.
2. Human Rights : Aligns with UN Declaration on Indigenous
Peoples (2007).

---
 Way Forward
1. FRA Implementation : Fast-track claims and train officials
on tribal rights.
2. Participatory Governance : Involve tribals in mining and
infrastructure decisions.
3. Cultural Education : Include tribal history in NCERT
textbooks.

---

Conclusion
Tribal rights are integral to India’s ecological and cultural
heritage. Balancing development with dignity will fulfill the
constitutional promise of inclusive growth.

---

18. Cyber Laws and Digital Rights

Intro/Quote :
“Digital rights are human rights in the virtual world.” —
Edward Snowden

---

Data/Facts
1. Legal Framework : IT Act (2000), DPDP Act (2023), and
CERT-IN directives (2022).
2. Cybercrime : 1.5 lakh cases reported in 2023 (NCRB);
financial frauds dominate (65%).
3. Internet Penetration : 52% of Indians online; 60% access
via mobile (IAMAI, 2024).
4. Global Rankings : India 10th in cybercrime targets; 4th in
data breaches (Surfshark, 2023).
5. Aadhaar Usage : 1.3 billion enrolled; 50 crore linked to
bank accounts (UIDAI, 2024).

---

Recent Examples
1. DPDP Act (2023) : Introduced consent-based data
processing and penalties up to ₹500 crore.
2. CERT-IN Directives (2022) : Mandated VPN providers to log
user data, sparking privacy debates.
3. AIIMS Cyberattack (2022) : Ransomware disrupted
healthcare services for a week.

---

Main Body/Positives
1. Digital Economy : UPI transactions hit ₹200 lakh crore in
2023, boosting financial inclusion.
2. Data Protection : DPDP Act aligns with EU’s GDPR,
enhancing global trust.
3. E-Governance : DigiLocker and CoWIN streamlined public
service delivery.
4. Cyber Defense : CERT-IN neutralized 1.2 lakh cyber threats
in 2023.
5. Judicial Precedents : SC recognized privacy as a
fundamental right ( Puttaswamy , 2017).

---

Challenges/Negatives
1. Surveillance Concerns : Pegasus spyware and IT Rules
(2021) threaten privacy.
2. Digital Divide : 70% rural women lack internet access
(NFHS, 2023).
3. Legal Gaps : IT Act lacks provisions for AI, deepfakes, and
cryptocurrency.
4. Enforcement Issues : Only 15% cybercrimes result in
convictions (NCRB).

---

Government Initiatives
1. National Cyber Security Strategy (2024) : Aims to secure
critical infrastructure.
2. Digital India Bhashini : Promotes regional language access
to digital services.
3. Startup India : Funds 100+ cybersecurity startups.

---
 Relevance
1. Economic Security : Protects $1 trillion digital economy
from cyber threats.
2. Citizen Trust : Ensures safe online spaces for banking,
education, and healthcare.

---

Way Forward
1. Awareness Campaigns : Teach cyber hygiene in schools
and villages.
2. Tech Upgrades : Adopt blockchain for secure transactions.
3. Global Cooperation : Join Budapest Convention on
Cybercrime.

---

Conclusion
Cyber laws must balance innovation with rights. A robust
framework will secure India’s digital future while upholding
democratic values.

---

19. Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)

Introduction/Quote :
“Panchayati Raj is the cornerstone of India’s grassroots
democracy.” – Mahatma Gandhi
 Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Basis : 73rd Amendment (1992)
institutionalized PRIs under Articles 243–243O.
2. Three-Tier System : Gram Panchayat (village), Panchayat
Samiti (block), Zila Parishad (district).
3. Reservations : 33% seats for women, SC/ST quotas as per
population.
4. Elected Representatives : Over 3.1 million representatives,
46% women (2023).
5. Financial Devolution : 15th Finance Commission allocated
₹2.38 lakh crore (2021–26).
6. Key Function : Implement schemes like MGNREGA, PMAY-G.

Recent Examples :
1. Bihar’s e-Panchayat Initiative : Digital tracking of welfare
schemes (2023).
2. Kerala’s People’s Plan Campaign : Decentralized budgeting
through Gram Sabhas.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Grassroots Democracy : Empowers local decision-making.
2. Women’s Empowerment : 1.4 million women in leadership
roles.
3. Accountability : Social audits ensure transparency.
4. Rural Development : Improved infrastructure (roads,
schools).
5. Inclusion : SC/ST participation in governance.
6. Disaster Management : PRIs led COVID-19 relief in villages.
 Challenges/Negatives :
1. Funds-Functions Gap : Limited control over budgets.
2. Bureaucratic Interference : State governments often
override PRI authority.
3. Capacity Issues : Lack of trained staff and technical
expertise.
4. Elite Capture : Influential groups dominate decision-
making.
5. Low Awareness : Gram Sabha participation remains poor
(30% average attendance).

Government Initiatives :
1. Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan : Capacity-building for PRI
representatives.
2. e-GramSwaraj Portal : Unified platform for financial
management.
3. SVAMITVA Scheme : Land rights documentation using
drones.

Relevance :
Critical for achieving SDGs (e.g., poverty reduction, gender
equality) through localized governance.

Way Forward :
1. Devolution of 3Fs : Funds, functions, functionaries.
2. Digital Training : Enhance tech literacy among PRI
members.
3. Social Audit Expansion : Mandate audits for all schemes.
 Conclusion :
Strengthening PRIs is vital for inclusive and participatory rural
development.

---

20. Judicial Independence in India

Introduction/Quote :
“Judicial independence is the bedrock of democracy.” – Justice
H.R. Khanna

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Safeguards : Articles 124 (SC), 214–231
(HCs) ensure tenure and salary protection.
2. Collegium System : Judges appoint judges (Second Judges
Case, 1993).
3. Pending Cases : 4.9 crore cases in subordinate courts
(NCRB 2023).
4. Judicial Infrastructure : Only 21,000 courtrooms for 25,000
judges.

Recent Examples :
1. NJAC Strike Down (2015) : SC upheld collegium system.
2. Judge Appointments Delay : 40% vacancies in HCs (2024).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Rule of Law : Checks executive/legislative excesses (e.g.,
ADM Jabalpur case review).
2. Fundamental Rights Protection : Landmark judgments (e.g.,
Right to Privacy, 2017).
3. Judicial Review : Ensures constitutional validity (Basic
Structure Doctrine).
4. Public Trust : 68% citizens trust judiciary (Lokniti-CSDS
2023).
5. Innovation : Virtual courts, e-filing during COVID-19.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Collegium Opacity : Lack of transparency in appointments.
2. Case Backlog : Average case pendency of 5+ years.
3. Executive Interference : Delays in clearing judicial
appointments.
4. Judicial Overreach : Policy-making via PILs (e.g., banning
firecrackers).
5. Gender Imbalance : Only 13% women judges in HCs
(2023).

Government Initiatives :
1. e-Courts Mission Mode Project : Digitizing 18,000+ courts.
2. National Judicial Data Grid : Real-time case tracking.

Relevance :
Ensures accountability in governance and protects citizen rights
against arbitrariness.
 Way Forward :
1. Transparent Appointments : Publish collegium
deliberations.
2. All India Judicial Service : Standardize recruitment.
3. Fast-Track Courts : Prioritize serious offences (rape,
corruption).

Conclusion :
Judicial independence must be preserved through reforms that
balance autonomy and accountability.

---

21. Right to Information (RTI) Act

Introduction/Quote :
“RTI is the most transformative law since Independence.” –
Aruna Roy

Data/Facts :
1. Enactment : RTI Act passed in 2005; over 60 lakh
applications filed annually.
2. Exemptions : Section 8 excludes intelligence, cabinet
papers.
3. Pending Appeals : 2.8 lakh cases in Information
Commissions (2023).
4. Whistleblower Protection : 101 activists killed since 2005
(Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative).
 Recent Examples :
1. Electoral Bonds Disclosure (2024) : SC relied on RTI to
expose donor details.
2. PM-CARES Fund : RTI queries denied under “third-party”
clause.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Transparency : Exposed scams (2G, coal allocation).
2. Empowerment : Marginalized groups access welfare
scheme data.
3. Accountability : Reduced bureaucratic corruption.
4. Judicial Use : SC cited RTI in NJAC and Aadhaar verdicts.
5. Global Recognition : Ranked 4th in global RTI ratings
(2023).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Information Denial : 35% RTIs rejected arbitrarily (CIC
report).
2. Vacancies : 30% posts vacant in Information Commissions.
3. Safety Risks : Journalists/activists targeted for filing RTIs.
4. Dilution Attempts : 2019 amendments weakened
commissioners’ autonomy.

Government Initiatives :
1. RTI Online Portal : 95% applications filed digitally (2023).
2. Proactive Disclosure : Ministries publish budgets, policies
online.
 Relevance :
Critical for combating corruption and ensuring participatory
governance.

Way Forward :
1. Fill Vacancies : Time-bound appointments in Information
Commissions.
2. Whistleblower Protection Law : Expedite pending bill.
3. Awareness Drives : Promote RTI in rural areas.

Conclusion :
RTI remains a powerful tool for democracy but requires robust
safeguards against dilution.

---

22. Citizenship and National Register of Citizens (NRC)

Introduction/Quote :
“Citizenship is the right to have rights.” – Hannah Arendt

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Basis : Articles 5–11 define citizenship.
2. NRC in Assam (2019) : Excluded 19 lakh applicants; only
13% Hindus.
3. CAA (2019) : Fast-tracks citizenship for non-Muslims from
Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh.
4. Detention Camps : 6 functional camps in Assam (2023).
 Recent Examples :
1. CAA Protests (2020) : Nationwide demonstrations against
religious exclusion.
2. Delhi Riots (2020) : Linked to anti-CAA agitation.

Main Body/Positives :
1. National Security : Identifies illegal migrants.
2. Protection for Minorities : CAA aids persecuted
communities.
3. Legal Clarity : NRC resolves long-standing border disputes.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Exclusion Errors : Genuine citizens left out due to
documentation gaps.
2. Communal Polarization : CAA seen as anti-Muslim.
3. Costly Process : Assam NRC cost ₹1,600 crore.
4. Statelessness Risk : Detainees lack access to basic rights.

Government Initiatives :
1. CAA Implementation (2024) : Rules notified after 4-year
delay.
2. E-Portal for Citizenship : Online applications under
Citizenship Act, 1955.

Relevance :
Impacts national identity, security, and India’s secular ethos.

Way Forward :
1. Transparent NRC : All-India rollout with fair documentation.
2. Refugee Policy : Align with international conventions.
3. Rehabilitation Plans : For excluded individuals.

Conclusion :
Citizenship policies must balance security with humanitarian
values to uphold constitutional morality.

---

23. Environmental Laws and Policies

Introduction/Quote :
“Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s needs, but not
greed.” – Gandhi

Data/Facts :
1. Key Laws : Environment Protection Act (1986), Forest
Conservation Act (1980).
2. Climate Commitments : Net-zero target by 2070 (COP26).
3. Air Quality : 63 Indian cities among top 100 polluted
globally (IQAir 2023).

Recent Examples :
1. Delhi Smog (2023) : SC mandated GRAP measures.
2. Great Nicobar Project : Environmentalists oppose
deforestation.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Conservation : Protected 5% of land as wildlife sanctuaries.
2. Renewable Energy : 40% energy from renewables by 2030
(target).
3. Judicial Activism : SC banned single-use plastics (2022).
4. Global Leadership : International Solar Alliance initiative.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Weak Enforcement : Industries flout emission norms.
2. Land-Use Conflicts : Tribals displaced for mining projects.
3. Climate Funding : Only 25% of required ₹11.6 lakh crore
mobilized (2023).

Government Initiatives :
1. National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) : Reduce PM2.5 by
40% by 2026.
2. Green Credit Scheme : Incentivize afforestation.

Relevance :
Critical for sustainable development amid climate crises and
biodiversity loss.

Way Forward :
1. Stricter Penalties : For environmental violations.
2. Community Participation : Involve locals in conservation.
3. Climate Budgeting : Allocate funds for adaptation.

Conclusion :
Robust environmental governance is non-negotiable for
intergenerational equity and planetary health.

---

24. Women and Child Rights: PENCIL, Nari Shakti, Child

Welfare
Introduction/Quote :
"Empowering women and protecting children is the foundation
of a progressive society." – Narendra Modi

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Backing : Articles 15(3), 21A, and 39(f)
mandate gender justice and child welfare.
2. PENCIL Portal : Launched in 2017, rescued 600,000+
children from labor (2023 data).
3. Nari Shakti Vandan Act (2023) : 33% reservation for women
in legislatures (effective post-2029 delimitation).
4. Beti Bachao Beti Padhao : Improved sex ratio in Haryana
from 834 (2014) to 952 (2023).
5. POSCO Act (2012) : 68% conviction rate in child sexual
abuse cases (NCRB 2023).

Recent Examples :
1. Nari Shakti Vandan Implementation Delay : Awaiting
delimitation post-2026 census.
2. Child Labor Crackdown : 12,000+ rescues via PENCIL in
2023.
 Main Body/Positives :
1. Legal Safeguards : POCSO Act, Juvenile Justice Act ensure
child protection.
2. Economic Empowerment : SHGs under Deendayal
Antyodaya Yojana benefit 9 crore women.
3. Education : RTE Act increased girls’ enrollment to 88.6%
(NFHS-5).
4. Health : PM Matru Vandana Yojana provided ₹6,000 to 3
crore mothers.
5. Political Representation : 46% women in Bihar Panchayats
(2023).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Gender Violence : 31% rise in domestic violence cases
(NCRB 2023).
2. Child Labor : 10.1 million children in informal sectors (ILO
2023).
3. Implementation Gaps : Only 40% POSCO cases reach trial.
4. Cultural Barriers : Patriarchal norms hinder women’s
leadership.

Government Initiatives :
1. Mission Shakti : Integrated women’s safety and
empowerment (2021).
2. Baal Swaraj Portal : Tracks vulnerable children.
3. Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana : 3.2 crore accounts opened
(2024).

Relevance :
Critical for achieving SDGs 5 (Gender Equality) and 4 (Quality
Education).

Way Forward :
1. Fast-Track Courts : For POSCO and domestic violence cases.
2. Awareness Campaigns : Challenge gender stereotypes
through media.
3. Strengthen Anganwadis : Upgrade infrastructure for child
care.

Conclusion :
Holistic policies and societal mindset shifts are essential to
secure women and children’s rights.

---

25. Health and Education: Ayushman Bharat and NEP 2020

Introduction/Quote :
"Health is wealth, education is the key to progress." – Abdul
Kalam

Data/Facts :
1. Ayushman Bharat : Covers 55 crore beneficiaries; 5.4 crore
hospital admissions (2023).
2. NEP 2020 : Aims 6% GDP allocation to education; 100%
GER in schools by 2030.
3. PM-SHRI Schools : 14,500 schools upgraded with NEP-
aligned infrastructure.
4. Health Infrastructure : 1.5 lakh Health & Wellness Centres
operational (2024).

Recent Examples :
1. NEP Implementation : Multilingual education introduced in
10 states.
2. Ayushman Bharat Expansion : Includes mental health
services (2023).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Universal Healthcare : ₹5 lakh/year coverage per family.
2. Skill Development : Vocational courses in 5,000+ schools
under NEP.
3. Digital Education : DIKSHA platform used by 15 crore
students.
4. Preventive Care : Screening for non-communicable
diseases in rural areas.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Rural Gaps : 30% subcenters lack doctors (Rural Health
Statistics 2023).
2. Teacher Shortage : 1.2 million vacancies in schools.
3. Low Expenditure : Education spending at 2.9% GDP (below
6% target).

Government Initiatives :
1. National Digital Health Mission : Unified health IDs for 13
crore citizens.
2. NIPUN Bharat : Foundational literacy mission for Class 3
students.

Relevance :
Key to demographic dividend and achieving Viksit Bharat by
2047.

Way Forward :
1. Public-Private Partnerships : Boost healthcare
infrastructure.
2. Teacher Training : Align pedagogy with NEP’s
multidisciplinary approach.
3. Telemedicine Expansion : Bridge urban-rural health divide.

Conclusion :
Ayushman Bharat and NEP 2020 are transformative but require
sustained funding and grassroots execution.

---

26. Rights of Transgender Persons, PVTGs, and Forest Rights

Introduction/Quote :
"Inclusion is not a matter of political correctness; it is the key to
societal growth." – Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

Data/Facts :
1. Transgender Rights : NALSA v. Union of India (2014)
recognized third gender; 48,000+ UDID cards issued (2023).
2. PVTGs : 75 groups notified; 44% live below poverty line
(MoTA 2023).
3. Forest Rights Act (2006) : 56% of 42 lakh claims approved
(2023).

Recent Examples :
1. Transgender Welfare Boards : Established in 12 states
(2024).
2. Jharkhand PVTG Land Rights : 10,000 acres titled under
FRA.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Legal Recognition : Transgender Persons Act (2019) bans
discrimination.
2. Empowerment : Reservations in education and jobs for
PVTGs.
3. Forest Rights : 15 lakh ST families granted land titles.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Stigma : 78% transgender persons face workplace
harassment (NHRC 2023).
2. Land Alienation : 30% FRA claims rejected due to
bureaucratic hurdles.
3. Healthcare Access : 60% PVTGs lack primary health
centers.

Government Initiatives :
1. SMILE Scheme : ₹365 crore allocated for transgender
welfare (2022).
2. PVTG Development Plan : ₹15,000 crore for 2022–27.

Relevance :
Integral to social justice and environmental sustainability.

Way Forward :
1. Sensitization Drives : Training for officials and police.
2. Fast-Track FRA Claims : Digitize land records.
3. Healthcare Camps : Mobile units for PVTG areas.

Conclusion :
Protecting marginalized communities strengthens India’s
democratic fabric and ecological balance.

---

27. Disability Rights and Digital Inclusion

Introduction/Quote :
"Disability is a matter of perception. With technology, we can
bridge gaps." – Stephen Hawking

Data/Facts :
1. Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act (2016) : Covers 21
disabilities; 4% reservation in jobs.
2. Digital India : 80% government websites now WCAG 2.1
compliant (2024).
3. Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan : 1,000+ railway stations made
accessible.
 Recent Examples :
1. UDID Coverage : 75 lakh unique disability IDs generated
(2024).
2. AI-Based Tools : ISLRTC launched sign language apps for 6
regional languages.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Accessibility : Mandatory ramps, braille signage in public
spaces.
2. Education : 2.5 lakh children enrolled under Samagra
Shiksha’s inclusive education.
3. Employment : 1.2 lakh persons with disabilities hired in
public sector (2023).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Infrastructure Gaps : 60% schools lack wheelchair access.
2. Awareness : 70% rural population unaware of disability
schemes.
3. Digital Divide : Only 30% disabled persons use assistive
tech.

Government Initiatives :
1. Accessible India Campaign (AIC) : Upgraded 50+ airports
and metros.
2. NIOS Initiatives : Tailored courses for visually/hearing
impaired.

Relevance :
Aligns with UNCRPD and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).

Way Forward :
1. Tech Innovation : Subsidize affordable assistive devices.
2. Inclusive Design : Involve disabled persons in policy-
making.
3. Skill Development : Vocational training aligned with market
needs.

Conclusion :
Digital inclusion and rights enforcement can transform disabled
citizens into nation-building contributors.

---

28. India’s Constitutional Comparison with UK and US

Introduction/Quote :
"The Indian Constitution is a transformative document blending
global wisdom." – Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

Data/Facts :
1. Parliamentary System : Borrowed from UK (collective
responsibility, nominal head).
2. Fundamental Rights : Inspired by US Bill of Rights but with
reasonable restrictions.
3. Judicial Review : Adopted from US (Basic Structure
Doctrine).
4. Federalism : Quasi-federal structure vs. US’s dual
federalism.

Recent Examples :
1. NJAC Case (2015) : SC upheld collegium system, reflecting
judicial independence akin to US.
2. Brexit Impact : UK’s unwritten constitution vs. India’s
detailed framework.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Flexibility : Easier amendments than US (Article 368).
2. Directive Principles : Unique blend of socialist ideals (Irish
influence).
3. Emergency Provisions : Borrowed from Weimar Germany
but with 44th Amendment safeguards.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Centralization : Overlap in concurrent list creates Centre-
state friction.
2. Judicial Backlog : Unlike UK, India lacks time-bound justice
delivery.

Relevance :
Understanding comparative frameworks aids legal reforms and
global cooperation.

Way Forward :
1. Decentralization : Strengthen inter-state councils for
cooperative federalism.
2. Judicial Reforms : Adopt UK’s time-bound case disposal
mechanisms.

Conclusion :
India’s Constitution is a living document that adapts global best
practices while preserving its unique socio-cultural ethos.

---

29. Rule of Law and Democracy Index: Global Reflection

Introduction/Quote :
“The rule of law is the foundation of a just society.” – Amartya
Sen

Data/Facts :
1. Rule of Law Index 2023 : India ranked 79/142 (World Justice
Project).
2. Democracy Index 2023 : India classified as a “Flawed
Democracy” (6.41/10, EIU).
3. Judicial Pendency : 4.9 crore pending cases (NCRB 2023).
4. Corruption Perception : Ranked 93/180 (Transparency
International 2023).
5. Press Freedom : Ranked 161/180 (Reporters Without
Borders 2023).
6. Voter Turnout : 67% in 2024 general elections.

Recent Examples :
1. Electoral Bonds Verdict (2024) : SC struck down the
scheme, reinforcing transparency.
2. Sedition Law Reforms : SC stayed sedition trials pending
government review (2023).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Judicial Activism : PILs addressing environmental and rights
issues.
2. Digital Governance : e-Courts, FASTER system for speedy
justice.
3. Electoral Integrity : EVM-VVPATs ensured fair elections.
4. Anti-Corruption Measures : Lokpal operationalized (2019).
5. Civil Society Engagement : RTI and social audits fostering
accountability.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Judicial Delays : Average case pendency of 5+ years.
2. Political Interference : Misuse of agencies like ED/CBI (40%
cases against opposition leaders).
3. Censorship : Internet shutdowns (84 instances in 2023).
4. Criminalization of Politics : 43% MPs with criminal charges
(ADR 2024).
5. Weak Enforcement : Poor implementation of SC directives
(e.g., mob lynching guidelines).

Government Initiatives :
1. e-Courts Mission Mode Project : Digitizing 18,000+ courts.
2. Legal Aid Clinics : NALSA assisted 1.2 crore beneficiaries
(2023).
3. National Judicial Data Grid : Real-time case tracking.

Relevance :
Critical for investor confidence, social harmony, and upholding
constitutional morality.

Way Forward :
1. Judicial Reforms : Fill 40% vacancies in HCs; fast-track
courts.
2. Whistleblower Protection : Enact pending legislation.
3. Media Freedom : Repeal/review restrictive laws (IT Rules
2021).

Conclusion :
Strengthening the rule of law is indispensable for India’s
democratic and economic aspirations.

---

30. Parliamentary vs Presidential System: Indian Debate

Introduction/Quote :
“The parliamentary system is the lifeblood of Indian
democracy.” – Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Framework : Articles 74 (Council of
Ministers), 75 (PM), and 79 (Parliament).
2. Global Models : UK (parliamentary), USA (presidential),
France (semi-presidential).
3. Hung Parliaments : 4 instances since 1989 (e.g., 1996,
1998).
4. Coalition Governments : 6 governments formed since
1989.

Recent Examples :
1. 2024 Elections : NDA formed government with coalition
partners.
2. West Bengal vs Centre : Federal disputes over IAS postings.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Flexibility : Easier formation of coalition governments.
2. Accountability : PM’s Question Hour ensures executive
scrutiny.
3. Federal Balance : Rajya Sabha represents states’ interests.
4. Collective Responsibility : Council of Ministers jointly
accountable.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Instability : Short-lived governments (e.g., 1979–1980).
2. Executive Dominance : Ordinance overuse (e.g., Farm Laws
2020).
3. Disruptions : Lok Sabha productivity at 70% (PRS 2023).
4. Centralization : Overlap in concurrent list (e.g., education,
health).
 Government Initiatives :
1. Anti-Defection Law : Tenth Schedule to curb horse-trading.
2. NITI Aayog : Replaced Planning Commission for cooperative
federalism.

Relevance :
Impacts policy continuity, federal relations, and governance
efficiency.

Way Forward :
1. Fixed Tenure : Explore fixed-term parliaments.
2. Empower Committees : Strengthen PAC, Estimates
Committee.
3. State Autonomy : Decentralize more subjects to states.

Conclusion :
India’s parliamentary system needs institutional reforms, not
structural overhaul, to enhance stability.

---

31. Simultaneous Elections in India

Introduction/Quote :
“One Nation, One Election will save resources and ensure
governance continuity.” – PM Modi

Data/Facts :
1. Historical Precedent : Simultaneous elections held until
1967.
2. Cost Savings : Estimated ₹10,000 crore per election cycle
(ECI 2023).
3. Constitutional Amendments : Required for Articles 83 (LS),
85 (dissolution), and 172 (State Assemblies).
4. Law Commission (2018) : Recommended phased
synchronization by 2029.

Recent Examples :
1. Kovind Committee (2023) : Submitted report on
implementation roadmap.
2. Andhra Pradesh & Odisha : Conducted LS and assembly
polls together in 2024.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Governance Continuity : Reduced policy paralysis during
MCC.
2. Cost Efficiency : Savings on logistics, security, and
campaigning.
3. Voter Convenience : Single electoral roll (ERONET
initiative).
4. Reduced Polarization : Fewer divisive campaigns.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Federal Concerns : Undermines regional issues and parties.
2. Logistical Hurdles : Requires 3 million EVMs and 15 million
staff.
3. Mid-Term Dissolutions : No clarity on handling premature
elections.

Government Initiatives :
1. Draft Legislation : “One Nation, One Election” Bill circulated
in 2024.
2. ERONET : Integration of electoral rolls with Aadhaar.

Relevance :
Potential to streamline governance but risks sidelining regional
mandates.

Way Forward :
1. Consensus Building : All-party meetings for bipartisan
support.
2. Pilot Projects : Test in smaller states before national rollout.
3. Constitutional Safeguards : Ensure state assembly terms
align without coercion.

Conclusion :
Simultaneous elections can enhance efficiency but require
careful federal balancing.

---

32. Electoral Reforms: Model Code of Conduct, AI, and

Transparency
Introduction/Quote :
“Free and fair elections are the soul of democracy.” – Chief
Election Commissioner

Data/Facts :
1. Model Code of Conduct (MCC) : Enforced since 1960; lacks
statutory backing.
2. Electoral Bonds : ₹16,000 crore collected before SC
scrapped it (2024).
3. AI Integration : cVIGIL app resolved 2 lakh complaints in
2024 polls.
4. Voter Turnout : 67% in 2024 LS elections (ECI).

Recent Examples :
1. SC Verdict on Electoral Bonds : Mandated SBI to disclose
donor details.
2. Deepfake Regulation : ECI banned AI-generated content
during 2024 polls.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Transparency : VVPATs and mandatory candidate affidavits.
2. Inclusivity : Postal ballots for seniors/disabled; 12 lakh first-
time voters in 2024.
3. Tech-Driven Governance : cVIGIL, Suvidha portal for
candidate clearance.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Money Power : 40% candidates’ expenses exceed limits
(ADR 2024).
2. Misinformation : 500+ fake news cases reported in 2024
elections.
3. Criminalization : 45% MPs face criminal charges (2024).

Government Initiatives :
1. Electoral Bond Ban : Post-SC verdict, exploring state-
funded elections.
2. Remote Voting : Pilot for migrant workers in 2024.

Relevance :
Determines public trust in democracy and global reputation.

Way Forward :
1. State Funding : Cap election expenses; public disclosure of
donations.
2. AI Regulation : Framework to monitor deepfakes/bots.
3. MCC Legally Binding : Enact as law under RPA, 1951.

Conclusion :
Electoral reforms must evolve to counter new-age challenges
while preserving integrity.

---

33. Role of Civil Services in Modern Governance

Introduction/Quote :
“The steel frame of India’s administration.” – Sardar Patel
 Data/Facts :
1. Constitutional Basis : Articles 311 (dismissal), 312 (All India
Services).
2. Strength : 5,500 IAS officers; 50,000+ civil servants.
3. Mission Karmayogi : Trained 4.6 lakh officials on iGOT
platform (2024).
4. Lateral Entry : 38 specialists inducted since 2019.

Recent Examples :
1. COVID-19 Management : IAS officers led vaccine
distribution and lockdown enforcement.
2. Tech-Driven Reforms : PRAGATI platform for grievance
redressal.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Policy Implementation : MGNREGA, PMAY executed through
district administrations.
2. Crisis Management : Flood relief, disaster response (e.g.,
Kerala 2018).
3. Innovation : e-Governance (DigiLocker, UMANG app).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Bureaucratic Delays : 60% projects miss deadlines (CAG
2023).
2. Political Interference : Frequent transfers (e.g., 200+ IAS
transfers in UP in 2023).
3. Skill Gaps : Only 30% trained in emerging tech (AI,
blockchain).
 Government Initiatives :
1. Mission Karmayogi : Competency-driven training modules.
2. SPARROW Portal : Performance appraisal digitization.

Relevance :
Critical for last-mile delivery and achieving SDGs.

Way Forward :
1. Merit-Based Promotions : End seniority-based elevation.
2. Tech Adoption : AI for decision-making and public service
delivery.
3. Ethics Training : Combat corruption and nepotism.

Conclusion :
Civil services must adapt to technological and societal changes
to remain effective.

---

34. Digital Governance and Data Protection

Introduction/Quote :
"Digital India is not a slogan but a way to empower citizens." –
PM Narendra Modi

Data/Facts :
1. Digital India Launch : 2015; 1.25 billion Aadhaar
enrollments (UIDAI, 2024).
2. DPDP Act 2023 : Mandates consent for data processing;
penalties up to ₹250 crore for breaches.
3. Internet Penetration : 52% (IAMAI 2024), with 900 million
users.
4. CoWIN Platform : 2.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses
administered (2023).
5. CERT-IN : Handled 1.4 million cyber incidents in 2023
(MeitY).
6. e-Governance Services : 4,000+ services on UMANG app;
1.3 billion transactions/month (2024).

Recent Examples :
1. AIIMS Cyberattack (2022) : Ransomware attack disrupted
services for two weeks.
2. Data Localization : RBI mandate for financial data storage
within India (2018).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Service Delivery : DigiLocker (150 million users) reduced
document fraud.
2. Transparency : DBT saved ₹2.7 lakh crore by eliminating
ghost beneficiaries (World Bank 2023).
3. Ease of Living : Online portals for passports, PAN, and
driving licenses.
4. Cyber Security : National Cyber Security Policy (2013)
strengthened critical infrastructure.

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Digital Divide : Only 33% rural women use the internet
(NFHS-5).
2. Privacy Concerns : Pegasus spyware allegations (2021)
raised surveillance fears.
3. Cybercrime : 65% rise in phishing attacks (NCRB 2023).

Government Initiatives :
1. IndiaAI Mission (2024) : ₹10,372 crore for AI infrastructure.
2. Cyber Surakshit Bharat : Trained 5,000 officials in cyber
hygiene.

Relevance :
Critical for achieving a $1 trillion digital economy by 2030.

Way Forward :
1. Universal Connectivity : Expand BharatNet to 250,000
gram panchayats.
2. Data Literacy Campaigns : Educate citizens on privacy
rights.

Conclusion :
Balancing innovation with robust data protection frameworks
will secure India’s digital future.

---

35. Key Legislative Developments: GNCTD Act, CAA, and

Nari Shakti Vandan
 Introduction/Quote :
"Laws must reflect societal evolution while upholding
constitutional values." – Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

Data/Facts :
1. GNCTD Act 2023 : Transfers control of services from Delhi
govt to LG; passed amid opposition walkouts.
2. CAA 2019 : Fast-tracks citizenship for non-Muslims from
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh.
3. Nari Shakti Vandan Act 2023 : 33% women’s reservation in
legislatures (effective post-delimitation).
4. Legal Challenges : SC upheld GNCTD Act’s validity in 2024;
CAA constitutionality under review.

Recent Examples :
1. Delhi Services Bill (2023) : Replaced ordinance after
Supreme Court’s May 2023 ruling.
2. CAA Protests : 2019–2020 saw nationwide demonstrations
against religious exclusion.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Women’s Empowerment : Historic step toward gender
parity in politics.
2. Federal Clarity : GNCTD Act delineates Centre-Delhi powers
(SR Bommai precedent).
3. Humanitarian Relief : CAA aids persecuted minorities (e.g.,
Sikhs, Hindus from Pakistan).

Challenges/Negatives :
1. Federal Friction : GNCTD Act perceived as undermining
elected Delhi govt.
2. Polarization : CAA criticized for violating secularism (Article
14).
3. Implementation Delays : Women’s reservation awaits 2026
census and delimitation.

Government Initiatives :
1. Awareness Campaigns : MHA’s CAA outreach in Assam and
Bengal.
2. Delimitation Commission : To redraw constituencies post-
2026.

Relevance :
Shapes India’s federalism, secularism, and gender justice
discourse.

Way Forward :
1. Judicial Clarity : Expedite SC rulings on CAA and GNCTD
Act.
2. Consensus Building : All-party dialogue on women’s quota
implementation.

Conclusion :
Legislation must balance progressive intent with inclusive
deliberation to maintain social harmony.

---
 36. Urban Governance: 74th Amendment and Smart Cities
Introduction/Quote :
"Cities are engines of growth; their governance determines
national progress." – NITI Aayog

Data/Facts :
1. 74th Amendment (1992) : Constitutionalized
municipalities; 12th Schedule lists 18 functions.
2. Smart Cities Mission (2015) : ₹1.7 lakh crore sanctioned for
100 cities; 6,452 projects completed (2024).
3. Urban Population : 36% of India (Census 2011); projected
to reach 50% by 2050.
4. AMRUT 2.0 : Aims universal water supply in 500 cities by
2026.

Recent Examples :
1. Chennai Smart City : Reduced flooding via integrated
drainage (2023).
2. Indore : Ranked India’s cleanest city 7th consecutive year
(2024).

Main Body/Positives :
1. Infrastructure Boost : 2,800 km of roads upgraded under
Smart Cities.
2. E-Governance : Integrated Command and Control Centres
(ICCCs) in 80 cities.
3. Waste Management : 70% waste processed in mission
cities vs. 30% nationally.
 Challenges/Negatives :
1. Funding Gaps : Only 20% of Smart Cities’ projects fully
funded.
2. Capacity Shortages : 40% municipal posts vacant (MoHUA
2023).
3. Slum Proliferation : 65 million urban slum dwellers (NSSO
2022).

Government Initiatives :
1. National Urban Digital Mission (2021) : Digital
infrastructure for ULBs.
2. Swachh Bharat Urban : 98% door-to-door waste collection
in mission cities.

Relevance :
Critical for sustainable urbanization and SDG 11 (Sustainable
Cities).

Way Forward :
1. Municipal Bonds : Pune and Hyderabad raised ₹2,000 crore
(2023).
2. PPP Models : Leverage private sector for metro/water
projects.

Conclusion :
Empowering ULBs with funds and autonomy is key to livable,
resilient cities.

---
 37. Panchayati Raj and Rural Governance
Introduction/Quote :
"Panchayati Raj is democracy at the grassroots." – Jawaharlal
Nehru

Data/Facts :
1. 73rd Amendment (1992) : 3-tier PRIs in 29 states; 2.55
lakh gram panchayats.
2. Devolution : 15th FC allocated ₹2.38 lakh crore to PRIs
(2021–26).
3. Women’s Representation : 46% of PRI members are women
(MoPR 2024).
4. e-GramSwaraj : 90% panchayats digitized financial
transactions (2023).

Recent Examples :
1. Kerala’s Kudumbashree : Women-led SHGs transformed
rural economy.
2. Bihar’s Jal Jeevan Hariyali : 1.5 million check dams built via
PRIs.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Grassroots Planning : 60% MGNREGA works approved by
Gram Sabhas.
2. Accountability : Social audits recovered ₹1,200 crore in
misused funds (CAG 2023).
3. Rural Employment : MGNREGA provided 2.5 billion person-
days (2023–24).
 Challenges/Negatives :
1. 3Fs Issue : Only 15% functions devolved to PRIs (NITI
Aayog 2022).
2. Fund Misuse : 25% panchayats flagged for irregularities
(CAG).
3. Low Awareness : 50% villagers unaware of PRI schemes
(ASER 2023).

Government Initiatives :
1. Audit Online : Mandatory social audit portal for MGNREGA.
2. SVAMITVA : 1 lakh villages surveyed for land records
(2024).

Relevance :
Key to rural poverty reduction and decentralized democracy.

Way Forward :
1. Capacity Building : Train 3 million PRI representatives by
2026.
2. Convergence : Link MGNREGA with agriculture and water
conservation.

Conclusion :
PRIs can drive equitable development if empowered with
resources and trust.

---
 38. Article 370 Abrogation and Its Implications
Introduction/Quote :
"Article 370 was a temporary provision; its abrogation
integrates J&K with India." – Home Minister Amit Shah

Data/Facts :
1. Abrogation Date : August 5, 2019 (via Presidential Order
and Parliament).
2. Reorganization : J&K bifurcated into UTs – J&K (legislature)
and Ladakh (no legislature).
3. Security Changes : AFSPA remains in 12 districts; militancy
incidents down 65% (MHA 2024).
4. Development Funds : ₹80,000 crore package announced
for J&K (2021).

Recent Examples :
1. Domicile Rules (2020) : 4.2 million certificates issued to
non-Kashmiris.
2. G20 Meeting (2023) : Held in Srinagar to showcase
normalcy.

Main Body/Positives :
1. Legal Integration : 890 central laws extended to J&K (e.g.,
RTE, RTI).
2. Economic Growth : ₹1,500 crore private investment in
tourism (2023).
3. Women’s Rights : Article 35A repeal allows property rights
for non-resident women.
 Challenges/Negatives :
1. Political Discontent : Mainstream parties demand statehood
restoration.
2. Unemployment : 23% in J&K vs. 7% national average (PLFS
2023).
3. Trust Deficit : Low voter turnout in 2024 LS polls (35% in
Srinagar).

Government Initiatives :
1. PMDP (Prime Minister’s Development Package) : ₹80,000
crore for infrastructure.
2. Roshan J&K : Solar power projects to ensure 24x7
electricity.

Relevance :
Critical for national security and socio-economic integration of
J&K.

Way Forward :
1. Statehood Restoration : As pledged by Home Minister in
2024.
2. Youth Engagement : Skill development via Himayat and
Udaan schemes.

Conclusion :
While abrogation has fostered integration, lasting peace
requires addressing political aspirations and unemployment.
---