SAMPLE NEEDS ANALYSIS
0
For this case study, I have chosen India, specifically Delhi where the majority of the
population speak Hindi with others speaking Urdu, Punjabi and Bengali. Hindi has become
the lingua franca in India and more acceptable through the different social levels. English
is now considered to be more of a ‘door opening key’ rather than giving the social status
that it once did (ET Bureau, The Economic Times, 2022). The acquisition of English can
provide both social and economic opportunities in India and overseas. With the global
expansion of businesses based in countries such as Australia, the UK and Canada,
opportunities for employment have risen and having a strong command of both written and
spoken English would benefit an individual exponentially. As India becomes increasingly
significant in the global economy, there is a greater willingness to become proficient in
English (Chin, Prekash & Azam, 2010). Proficiency in spoken English is particularly
desirable (Pearson, 2024). By enrolling their children in private language schools, parents
would be creating pathways to opportunities not afforded to non-English speakers. The
students are currently attending primary school and aged between 10 and 11 years old.
Typically, they learn their first language, in this case, Hindi, several times a week. They also
attend English lessons as part of their weekly timetable and some learn Urdu as a third
language. The learners are currently working between A2 and B1 of the Common European
Framework, so they are considered to be between basic and independent speakers,
listeners and writers.
Drawing on current teaching experiences, there are several methods that would enhance
and support the L2 learners and this approach of engaging several different pedagogical
approaches would allow for a wider range of effective teaching strategies (Brown and Lee,
1
2015). Children aged from 10-11 years have a limited attention span, around 20 to 30
minutes (Shakibaie, 2021), so any activities should be engaging, short and energetic to
maximise learning, retention of concepts and information being taught. Keeping the
learners motivated would also be a challenge. They attend the lessons at the behest of
their parents and, after full days at school, ensuring that the learners are engaged and
motivated could prove challenging. As young learners, the activities they engage in should
encourage them to use the second language without fear, so music, games and song give
them a mix of voices (Lightbown and Spada, 2006) rather than being singled out to speak.
This less formal way of teaching encourages participation.
To encourage engagement, the learners need to be taking part in activities, such as real
world ideas and creative and critical thinking problems where they feel intrinsically
motivated to learn as discussed by Ellis in his Principles of instructed language learning
(Ellis, 2005). Using contextualised themes with these young learners will support them in
creating communicative competence and combining several second language acquisition
teaching methods would encourage and develop language skills. There are significant
overlaps in methodologies (Nagy, 2019) so this supports the notion that a balanced
approach to Second Language Acquistion (SLA) would be a combination of teaching
methods to create a relaxed and informal learning environment. Krashen’s affective filter
hypothesis addresses the need to be aware of the emotional states and feelings of the
learners so SLA can take place. Students who are stressed and tense or bored will
frequently ‘filter’ out input and so acquisition becomes less likely (Lightbown and Spada,
2006). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) allows for a broad, more informal
2
approach toward learning because, by its nature, it is not prescriptive and allows for
teacher interpretation (Johnson and Morrow, 1981) and can also be contextualised to the
learners (Savignon, 2017).
Activities with a group of learners at the A2-B1 levels could be role play, interviews and
analysis of simple news articles and weather forecasts to provide authentic materials,
language games, scrambled sentences and picture strip stories (Johnson and Morrow,
1981). Savignon points out the CLT is not solely the use of face-to-face communication
and that writing and reading activities are of equal importance (Savignon, 2017). These
reading and writing activities though should still be based around authenticity. The use of
authentic materials when using the CLT method is important to stimulate spontaneous
interactions (Nagy, 2019). Materials such as magazine articles, podcast transcripts that
are about subjects the students can engage with, for example, interviews with YouTubers,
actors and musicians would spark their interest and begin those spontaneous
conversations between the children.
These interactions, along with intentional activities are part of Richard Schmidt’s (1990)
noticing hypothesis, where, by developing a self-awareness and noticing the input
(Lightbown and Spada, 2006), the input becomes intake and self-correction occurs (Unlu,
2015). As the students engage in group and partner interactions and tasks, their ability to
correct one another, in a non-judgmental manner, will lessen the anxiety around speaking
the target language, allowing for language acquisition. This interaction supports
Cooperative learning, as a pedagogical approach and builds teams who must work
together to succeed (Brown and Lee, 2015). With students aged 10-11, this kind of
3
camaraderie builds trust and confidence and allows the students to both self-correct and
peer correct with no loss of face which is important at this age.
As Brown and Lee point out, language teaching methods have become more eclectic as
further research into L2 acquisition has been done (Brown and Lee, 2015). The
Suggestopedia or accelerated learning method created by Georgi Lozanov, allows learners
to explore language acquisition in a relaxed, non-judgmental manner, immersed in the
target language through role-play, games, music and song as some of the approaches
utilised. Activities where choral speech is used allows for those less confident students to
participate with their peers and there is less fear of mistakes (Ur, 2012). Music, drama and
storytelling are ingrained in the Indian culture and, with the popularity of Bollywood
musical films in Indian culture and Hollywood and Broadway musicals in English speaking
cultures, these types of activities would be fun and encourage participation. Including
these as learning activities, a translation is created between the two cultures (Norris and
Tsedendamba, 2014). Languaculture (Agar, 1994), ties the language with the culture so the
students would be able to acquire an understanding of the emotion these bring out in the
target culture. Language is intertwined with culture and so the activities that the student
would be completing would have focus on rules, values, attitudes and beliefs (Brown and
Lee, 2015). Authentic and up to date digital experiences, such as the use of social media,
would also expose the A2 and B1 learners to the cultural norms of the target language.
Facilitating Zoom or Webex meetings with a partner school in an English speaking country
would provide opportunity for SLA conversation, questioning and exposure to culture. For
this age group, it would also provide the ‘comprehensible input’ that Krashen suggested in
4
his input hypothesis (Thornberrry, 2016). This would be another opportunity for some
learners to use language spontaneously in ‘real operating conditions’ (Thornberry, 2005, in
Becker and Roos, 2016).
While the CLT method allows for students to have control over their learning as the main
communicators, it also relies on textbooks and, while they have a place, unless the
activities are relevant, well-structured and coherent, often textbooks can be overwhelming
and confusing for learners. They can also be a very dull and uninteresting way to learn
(Nagy, 2019). Short textbook activities can be chosen as a support to consolidate either a
prior activity or as an extension of a verbal or kinesthetic activity but not as the basis for a
lesson. In Krashen’s Natural approach, textbooks are secondary to authentic language
materials (Nagy, 2019). His input hypothesis discusses input being slightly beyond the
current capabilities of the learners proficiency (Lucas, Villegas & Freedson-Gonzalez,
2008) and discerning selection of input would lead to greater output. This would encourage
extension of the learner’s SLA, but Krashen’s natural approach does not allow for teacher
correction unlike the CLT method where the teacher would facilitate the activities to
encourage student led learning, note any errors and these could be addressed during more
formal, focused activities (Johnson and Morrow, 1981). Until the learners are able to notice
their grammatical and lexical errors, any corrections should be teacher directed to ensure
that any initial misconceptions are dealt with.
Having had extensive experience teaching 10-11 year old primary students, my approach
to teaching has been challenged and has developed through conversations, observations
and collaborations with colleagues throughout my professional career. Students learn
5
best when they are given opportunities to converse, explore and create within
contextualised tasks which mirror the CLT method. SLA teaching should involve some level
of immersion in the language through play, music, drama, practical activities such as
cooking, art and conversation but also some more formal, teacher directed tasks to create
‘noticeability’ so that the students begin to self-correct as they recognise errors. It is a mix
of several methodologies that encourages student-based learning with teacher support
but with gradually less direct teacher correction and more student accountability. Student
directed learning encourages a more relaxed approach, independence and autonomy. It is
my firm belief that anxiety that arises from the fear of failure can dramatically hinder the
ability to learn and this is certainly true of SLA.
When students develop the ability to self-correct and notice errors, their confidence grows
and learning becomes more of a natural process with far greater uptake and engagement.
An SLA learning program for this age group that incorporates the approaches discussed
and links not only to the culture of their country but also the pre-teen culture of social
media, YouTube and celebrity, would motivate, excite and engage.
(Word count:1602)
6
Bibliography
Becker, C., & Roos, J. (2016). An approach to creative speaking activities in the young
learners’ classroom. Education Inquiry, 7(1), 27613.
https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.27613
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language
pedagogy. Pearson Education ESL.
7
CEPR. (2010). English skills raise wages for some, not all, in India. CEPR.
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/english-skills-raise-wages-some-not-all-india
Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209–224.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006
Johnson, K., & Morrow, K. (1981). Communication in the classroom: Applications and
methods for a communicative approach. Longman Publishing Group.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages are Learned: An Introduction to the
Main Theories of First and Second Language Acquisition (now in a New, Updated
Edition). Oxford University Press, USA.
Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive
teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110
McLeod, S. (2022, November 3). Simply psychology. Simply Psychology.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
Nagy, I. K. (2019). In between language teaching methods: Do we need (to know about)
methods at all? Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 11(3), 119–139.
https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2019-0030
Norris, L., & Tsedendamba, N. (2014). Applying Agar’s concept of ‘languaculture’ to explain
Asian students’ experiences in the Australian tertiary context. English Language
Teaching, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p205
North, B. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: An
introduction. The CEFR Common Reference Levels: Validated Reference Points and
Local Strategies.
Pearson. (2024). Global English Proficiency Report 2024 : Insights and trends for business
leaders. Www.Pearson.Com. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-
com/one-dot-com/pearson-languages/en-gb/pdfs/pearson-global-english-
proficiency-report-2024-1.pdf
8
Savignon, S. J. (2017). Communicative competence. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English
Language Teaching, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0047
Shakibaie, S. (2021, December 21). Child’s average attention span by age: From toddler to
teens. Ready Kids. https://readykids.com.au/average-attention-span-by-age/
Thornbury, S. (2016). Communicative language teaching in theory and practice. In The
Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 224–237). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676203-20
Ünlü, A. (2015). How Alert should I be to Learn a Language? The Noticing Hypothesis and
its Implications for Language Teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
199, 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.515
Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching. Cambridge University Press.