Ajogmf 101600
Ajogmf 101600
Note: Please do NOT make direct edits to the PDF using the editing tools as doing so could lead us to overlook your
desired changes. Rather, please request corrections by using the tools in the Comment pane to annotate the PDF and
call out the changes you are requesting. If you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then
please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file.
PDF ANNOTATIONS
Adobe Reader version 9 Adobe Reader version X and XI
When you open the PDF file using Adobe Reader, the To make annotations in the PDF file, open the PDF file using
Commenting tool bar should be displayed automatically; if Adobe Reader XI, click on ‘Comment’.
not, click on ‘Tools’, select ‘Comment & Markup’, then click
on ‘Show Comment & Markup tool bar’ (or ‘Show If this option is not available in your Adobe Reader menus
Commenting bar’ on the Mac). If these options are not then it is possible that your Adobe Acrobat version is lower
available in your Adobe Reader menus then it is possible than XI or the PDF has not been prepared properly.
that your Adobe Acrobat version is lower than 9 or the PDF
has not been prepared properly.
Journal: AJOGMF Please e-mail your responses and any corrections to:
Dear Author,
Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen anno-
tation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe
Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file. To ensure fast publication of your paper please return
your corrections within 48 hours.
Your article is registered as a regular item and is being processed for inclusion in a regular issue of the journal. If this is NOT
correct and your article belongs to a Special Issue/Collection please contact [email protected] immediately prior to
returning your corrections.
Any queries or remarks that have arisen during the processing of your manuscript are listed below and highlighted by flags in
the proof. Click on the ‘Q’ link to go to the location in the proof.
Q1 Please review and confirm whether “Letter to the editor regarding” should be removed from the article
title and changed to “The preeclampsia and hypertension target treatment study: a multicenter prospec-
tive study to evaluate the effectiveness of the antihypertensive therapy based on maternal hemodynamic
findings.”
Q2 Per Journal style, the term “Caucasian” has been changed to “White.” Please review and confirm the
change.
Q3 In the sentence beginning with “Furthermore, the article provided no method to. . .,” the author name
for reference 4 was revised as per reference list. Please review.
Q4 Sentence beginning “In conclusion, to improve the effectiveness. . .” okay as edited?
Q5 There is no mention of an ethical statement in the style guide. Therefore, please review and confirm
whether the ethical statement section should be removed from the article or presented as article title
footnotes.
Q6 Please review the given names (no colouring) and surnames (highlighted in teal colouring) to make
sure that we have identified them correctly and that they are presented in the desired order. Carefully
verify the spelling of all authors’ names as well. If changes are needed, please provide the edits in the
author section.
Q7 Per Journal style, please provide the highest degree obtained by the authors in place of XX.
hemodynamic findings”
16 117
17 118
18 119
19 120
20 121
21 122
22 123
23 To the Editor: output, and stroke volume. In addition, a detailed BSA mea- 124
24
25 We have reviewed the article entitled “The preeclampsia and surement would improve the accuracy of drug dosage calcula- 125
126
26 hypertension target treatment study: a multicenter prospec- tions, allowing treatments to be individualized according to 127
27 128
28 Q1 tive study to evaluate the effectiveness of the antihypertensive body size, resulting in more effective and safer interventions. 129
29 130
30 therapy based on maternal hemodynamic findings” by di Pas- In conclusion, to improve the effectiveness and wider applicabil- Q4 131
31 132
32 quo et al.1 We enjoyed reading this article and admire the ity of hypertension management in pregnancy, rectification of 133
33 134
34 authors for their remarkable work. We agree with the primary these deficiencies by using an enhanced study design inclusive 135
35 136
36 conclusion of the article that, for women with newly devel- of varied populations, reporting biochemical assessments when 137
37 138
38 oped hypertensive disorders, a reduced incidence of severe available, and applying valid measures for body metrics toward 139
39 hypertension was noted when the initial hypertensive treat- individualizing treatment can serve as an indispensable key. 140
40 141
41 ment was given. However, although the study provides mean- 142
42 143
43
44
ingful information, it is important to consider several ETHICAL STATEMENT : We hereby declare that the manu- Q5 144
145
45 limitations to fully comprehend the implications of the find- script entitled “Letter to the editor regarding ‘The pre- 146
46 147
47 ings, which would add more value to the study. eclampsia and hypertension target treatment study: a 148
48 149
49 First, the study remained short in discussing diverse racial multicenter prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness 150
50 and ethnic groups, which limits the generalizability of the 151
51 of the antihypertensive therapy based on maternal hemo- 152
52
53
findings beyond the Italian population. Given that African dynamic findings’”1 submitted to the American Journal of 153
154
54
55
American women have a higher risk of mortality from hyper- Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM adheres to the highest ethi- 155
156
56 tensive disorders of pregnancy than Hispanic, American cal standards and principles of academic integrity. We 157
57 158
58 Q2 Indian/Alaska Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, and White affirm that the content of this publication is original, and 159
59 160
60 women,2 this discussion could have provided a valuable per- any sources or references used have been appropriately 161
61 162
62 spective on maternal hemodynamic patterns, leading to more cited. 163
63 appropriate strategies. Second, the article of our concern 164
64 165
65 failed to mention the assessment of biochemical markers, spe- Plagiarism: We affirm that the manuscript is a result of 166
66 167
67 cifically N-terminal pro−B-type natriuretic peptide in preg- our original work, and any information, ideas, or wording 168
68 169
69 nant women with hypertensive disorders. The evaluation of taken from other sources have been properly acknowledged 170
70 171
71 this marker is significant as it helps rule out heart failure in through appropriate citations and references. 172
72 173
73 particular and allows an in-depth understanding of the patho- 174
74
75
physiology behind hypertensive disorders.3 This is relevant Authorship: We confirm that all individuals who have sig- 175
176
76 because it involves hemodynamic changes and biochemical 177
77 nificantly contributed to the content and findings of this man- 178
78 alterations that can influence disease progression and can be 179
79 uscript have been included as authors. 180
80 a valuable predictor of disease severity. 181
81 182
82 Q3 Furthermore, the article provided no method to evaluate the Data and research integrity: We affirm that the data pre- 183
83 184
84 pregestational body surface area (BSA) using the Boyd for- sented in the manuscript is accurate and authentic. 185
85
86 mula compared with another study by Ornaghi et al.4 A thor- 186
187
87 ough assessment of the BSA would greatly enhance the 188
88 Informed consent and privacy: Not applicable on this 189
89 evaluation of the hemodynamic profile as the BSA has a major 190
90 study. 191
91 effect on the results of systemic vascular resistance, cardiac 192
92 193
93 194
94 Ethical approval: Not applicable on this study. 195
95 196
96 197
97 Cite this article as: Jawaid M, Tanveer L, Maaz M. Letter to the editor regarding “The 198
98 preeclampsia and hypertension target treatment study: a multicenter prospective study
Ethical guidelines: We have followed the ethical guide- 199
99 200
100 to evaluate the effectiveness of the antihypertensive therapy based on maternal hemody- lines and principles outlined by the International Committee 201
101 namic findings”. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2025;xxx:101600. of Medical Journal Editors and any other relevant 202
203 professional organizations for the conduct and reporting of CREDIT AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Marium 305
204 306
205 research. Jawaid: Writing − original draft. Laiba Tanveer: Writing − 307
206 308
207 By submitting this manuscript, we acknowledge that we are original draft. Muhammad Maaz: Writing − review & 309
208 responsible for the content presented and that we have com- editing. 310
209 311
210 plied with the ethical standards and guidelines mentioned 312
211 313
212 above. We understand that any violation of these ethical prin- REFERENCES 314
213 315
214 ciples may result in the rejection or retraction of the manu- 1. di Pasquo E, Giannubilo SR, Valentini B, et al. The “Preeclampsia and
316
215 317
216 script. hypertension Target Treatment” study: a multicenter prospective study to 318
217 319
218 & evaluate the effectiveness of the antihypertensive therapy based on maternal 320
219 hemodynamic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2024;6:101368. 321
220 322
221 2. Lo JO, Mission JF, Caughey AB. Hypertensive disease of pregnancy 323
222 Q6 Marium Jawaid, XX and maternal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013;25:124–32. 324
223 325
224 Q7 Laiba Tanveer, XX 3. McLaughlin K, Scholten RR, Kingdom JC, Floras JS, Parker JD. 326
225 Should maternal hemodynamics guide antihypertensive therapy in pre- 327
226 Jinnah Sindh Medical University 328
227 eclampsia? Hypertension 2018;71:550–6. 329
228 Karachi, Pakistan 330
229
4. Ornaghi S, Caricati A, Di Martino DD, et al. Non-invasive maternal 331
[email protected]
230 hemodynamic assessment to classify high-risk pregnancies complicated 332
231 333
232 Muhammad Maaz, XX by fetal growth restriction. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc 2022;3:851971. 334
233 Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari 335
234 © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and 336
235 Karachi, Pakistan 337
236 data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. https://doi.org/ 338
237 The authors report no conflict of interest. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101600 339
238 340
239 341
240 342
241 343
242 344
243 345
244 346
245 347
246 348
247 349
248 350
249 351
250 352
251 353
252 354
253 355
254 356
255 357
256 358
257 359
258 360
259 361
260 362
261 363
262 364
263 365
264 366
265 367
266 368
267 369
268 370
269 371
270 372
271 373
272 374
273 375
274 376
275 377
276 378
277 379
278 380
279 381
280 382
281 383
282 384
283 385
284 386
285 387
286 388
287 389
288 390
289 391
290 392
291 393
292 394
293 395
294 396
295 397
296 398
297 399
298 400
299 401
300 402
301 403
302 404
303 405
304 406