0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 11 views 8 pages Chapter 3 US Latino Issues
The document discusses the decline of foreign language instruction in U.S. schools, particularly Spanish, amidst a growing Latino student population and the rising emphasis on computer science education. It critiques the superficial approach to cultural diversity in educational institutions and highlights the historical context of bilingual education, including legislative changes and societal attitudes towards language and identity. The text underscores the importance of maintaining linguistic diversity and the challenges faced by minority students in an educational system that often marginalizes their cultural backgrounds.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save chapter 3 US Latino Issues For Later 3
—___
Cultural and Linguistic
Diversity in Education
BACKGROUND
In December of 2014, Atlantic Magazine reported that despite the bene-
fits of bilingualism, “U.S. Schools Are Saying Goodbye to Foreign Lan-
guages.” The Success Academy Charter Schools that enroll about 9,000
students in 32 charter schools around New York City dropped their
foreign language requirement at a time when a high demand existed
for foreign language speakers. In an interview the school’s CEO apolo-
gized, explaining, “So something’s got to go. We picked—and you know
this may be shocking to this audience—we picked foreign languages
[to eliminate]. People say ‘Don’t you believe in foreign languages?’ I
love multilingualism. I speak French, but something had to go .... We
can’t do everything. And by the way, Americans don’t tend to do foreign
languages very well. I think if I were doing schools in Europe I might
feel differently, But my son took three years of French and he could
‘arely Say, ‘How are you?’...1 really believe whatever we do we
Should do it exceptionally well and I wasn’t sure that I could findValing
Hy good and cou ‘i a
oi,
foreign language instructors that were real
very high level” (Kohli, 2014).
ata
64 in the public)
Why has the instruction of Spanish deci
schools given the increase of the Latina/o student
Population? How is the elimination of Spanish 1
learning a slight to Latin America? Why are
know a foreign language less apt to be xeno,
an gua
People whe
Phobic?
This development was baffling to many because “the ‘majority,
leges expect a student to have a minimum of two years of ge
guage when applying to college” (Barber, 2015). The fact i hate
colleges are requiring a foreign language, Explanations a. ae
xenophobia to declining grade point averages. Politicans nat
ened the situation by passing legislation allowing students oe
tute coding classes such as computer science for
the foreign languags
requirement—the reasoning is that everyone speaks Englishes
rationale... is rooted in the rapidly changing world of informage,
technology. Jobs in programming and various information techwol
fields continue to be in high demand. Nonprofit K-12 advocates y
Code.org say that the number of computer science graduates in 2013
cannot fill the demand in the industry. “There are 38,175 new gradu.
ates to fill 618,000 open jobs” (Avelino, 2016). It doesn’t help foreign
languages that “President Barack Obama called for a $4 billion increase
in funding for computer science programs for high schools, citing the
need to meet the drastically under filled demand’ (Avelino, 2016). Uni-
versities show very little leadership and follow the money.
What is the relationship between the decline in Spanish
instruction and economics? Why would coding classes
trump foreign languages?
In the past, foreign languages were one of the few examples of ily
gualism and multiculturalism in high school and college classes. AC"
relation between the teaching of foreign languages and lip service 0
ethnic diversity exists at the university level. Publicly univers
praise diversity, although critics doubt whether they know what 8
Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger claims: "... the 12°
sity of our University community makes it possible for students
ulty, alumni, and neighbors to interact with—and thus be trans!
eer
1 and Linguistic Diversity In Education
wal am
! ”
nultiplicity of human perspectives” (Multicultural Adair
the number of students and faculty of color reat
re inger’s view diversity comes about by reruitin
in Bot Mia international students. They ate given spa
minor almost always inthe Student Union, Desig se
nivel ty administrators means more brown and black fees and at
unonce a week:
y-them
qrrealil¥
i highly gifted
Satis ion of Columbia University |
fhat is your opinior ity’s
viticultural paradigm? Will it achieve multiculturalism? |
Can diversity be achieved without a balance of diversity
{nstudents and faculty?
Le
[Although California has a sizable Latino population, the approach
sgno different atthe California state universities (CSU). The CSU para-
soy resembles that of the Ivy League schools; the only difference ie
of the elite. However, what the CSU calls cultural identity boils down
fo token brown and black faces. They sponsor taco nights and Black
History months, and occasionally fraternities mock minority cultures
In the end, diversity is measured by the color of faces. Not many
changes, however, have taken place, and cultural diversity amounts to
smoke and mirrors.
How do public state universities differ from Ivy League
universities? Do classes and special events socialize
students to accept different people and cultures? Evaluate
diversity at your school. “
CSUN services an area with a large Mexican/Latino population and
its mission is to educate an economically diverse population. Part of its
mission is to educate competent teachers for this diverse population.
Most studies prove that this mission is best achieved by employing
minority teachers who know those communities and can train teachers,
{each and motivate Mexican and Latino students
Why would white faculty members resist iting |
Professors of color? How is faculty diversity a key
institutional diversity?
‘aeUS. Lat hoy,
48 :
gtuSTI¢ DOMINATION
LINGUISTIC DOM
areas eset been se 858 WEAPON OF omg
vite jn ni that man invented culture Dut that cule
ta sper a MMIC US pen
dan cng our ives and eatonships. Culture much more ye
aa ar eso fod, tisconstantly changing, manipulate
the mest andthe elite who have reduced it 0 a commodity. Cua
gives meaning tour ines, Language sends Cultural messapuy Ne
fhe Toes we were well avare ofthe role of culture that went bey
manipulation of language
How does culture reinforce and maintain xenophol
During the 1960s, I was intellectually tickled by the lectures of
Leonard Olguin, a high school teacher who later taught at Los Beach
State College, The title of his book was Shuck Loves Chirley (Olguin,
1968), which summed up an essential linguistic conflict. I recalled my
‘own childhood when the teacher would grab my chin and yell at me,
“Look at me straight in the eyes; don't be shifty eyed, and don’tbe defi.
ant.” With a sore neck I would go home and when my father scolded
he Rot wanting to be defiant, would look straight into his eyes, and
‘he would yell at me, “Look down. Don’t be defiant.” The lessons
gived with me, and one ofthe first courses I designed for Chicano
‘Studies was called “Cultures in Conflict” (Acuiia, 1970).
Language is frequently used in culturally and ideologically biased
contexts. Accents are often graded. according to the prestige of the
Speakers’ country of origin. “In the context of ‘globalization, immigration,
- in Eee out ts prestige and power, there is an immense”
2013), Langone, ttt al itis the language of the colonizer (Waseem.
to econa eee orTeSpONdS to power domains, and it is a doorway
rh are cational Opportunities. English is the language Of
em European languape: yn and the World Bank. In fact, Nor
teacher dome’ the ll into this same orbit. On a daily basis, :
_ “student through the use of language. In m0
-qoonial languages suppress ty id the dev
pment of other languay ae eee
8es. They contribute to making the col
re
uistic Diversity in Education
unnat and tnt Divers a Fay we
extinct 1s commen in colonial situations yf
izers. policy is imposed limiting communicaoniy coo
con language. Fr example, during the dicen ences
tor Francisco Franco, the Cataléns oF Basques were binant
deteirlanguages- Accordingly, they reasoned Meagan lacked ine
ees 1Q testing played a major roe in justifying emetia Programs
flat tained Mexicans for subordinate roles in Amen society
During th 19205 about half of Mexican sien tend op
Mexican choos, Nota Protestants supported henge
cultural annihilation. Many reformers pushed for programs stressing
the cultural needs Of Mexican children. Some relornen ahve
compassionate Americanzation programs based onstesing thee
tveasses of Mexican culture, and they sponsored eultaal eee
exchanges with Mexico.
Protestant ministers such as the Reverend Robert N. MeLean, an
associate director of the Presbyterian Board of Mission in the Unig
States, were active in the Mexican and Puerto Rican communities vee
ing studies and establishing schools. They played important advoocy
toes. Mexicans also opposed the English Only teaching reyuromeng
enforced in Texas and other states during World War L which increnced
segregation.
During the 1920s, Mexican organizations established esueltas
(litle schools) dedicated to teaching reading and writing instruction
in Spanish to preschoolers. A bridge between these early scholars
and bilingual education and Chicana/o studies was University of
Texas Professor George I. Sanchez. Born in New Mexico educated in
Jerome, Arizona, Sanchez taught in public schools and earned an FaD
fom the University of California at Berkeley. Sanchez later taught at
the Universities of New Mexico and Texas and was a crusader for
wut! education for Mexican Americans, He was a gradualist—in
Ae With labor-oriented progressives of his time. In the fal of 1957
merican education entered an era of intense educational reform.
angen
of nati
SPUINIK
Our Soviet Union sparked a revolution when it launched Sputikin
had eee 1957, which led to cries for educational reform te a
Was phat” the United States in the race to outer space eae
st the United States spent billions of dollars into vi =
* teaching of math and seience, and a substantial amount werU.S. Hating ty
toy
f esocal sciences. Fora time, highe
as interested in reforming
forming
lan.
ties and th
* aogier as
sneer ene
sn i Eaucation Association publisheg p
asthe a peseent raPHNY Problem amon
ofits findings on
Invisible Mi HEA based MARY ris
a teeaching of biling¥al education,
sn Mevicn Ameren
ry ya 13-year eighth grade Mey
ccan America®
ME
sama Moxa, Tat setence as 2 scent of Bites
ben ep ee oFtwerens rationality I would accom.
Phan pmatter what emp todo, my dark skin always makes me feel
te Nin Ather hing tat "BE that Tam such a coward
tat ey wil nat gt for something Ver iE T know I'm right. Ido
Labor abla that it would take myself strongly
Trough Many people including ‘most of my teachers, have tried to tell
arena leader Wel, know better! Just ecause I may get better grades
than most of my fellow Mexicans “doesn’t mean a thing, [ could no more
get an original dea in. my head than be President of the United States
I don't know how to’ think for myself. I want to go to college, sure, but
dont a ube! Even worse where do Twant 10 02 Thess a,
wat dy afew hat trouble me dike to prove omy Parents that
fons thing Just because T don’t have the gumption 1 $7.08
et et aya doesnt mean that I can’t become something they'll be
are of But if find that! can't ring myself © g0 to cOUeES, TM get
Proud ot Ny atl get rid of me After reading, this, yOu PR
‘bly be surprised. This isthe way I feel about myselt, ‘and nobody can
sep Ble me, many have red and have failed: If God Wo
Snes allmy goss will No parents, teachers, or priest will chan
the course that my life isto follow. Don’t try. (National Association of
Education, 1966)
To begin with,
‘The purpose of the report was to encourage schools to implement
pedagogic adaresing thigh dropout rate of Mexican Amen,
dents, According to the NEA, the way was not to Americans’
take away the student's identity, It asked: “Is there something i
in ou system of public schooling that impedes the education O
sxican-American child—that indeed drives him to dtoP out?” The
nara a THE DE In tg
yort found the schools a
NEA report ols complicit; Me
NEA ed to fit a stereotype in the omit Mean Americans wer
se gle yay
y nationality Ie >
(National Association of Education, 1966)" #eeompish
more 7 California Governor Ronald Reagan
anudended 2 95-year-old state eduction adeann
that put instruction in English. The next year Peters
carmfigned Tile VIL ofthe Elementary and Sesiget Penne
son Sovided funds for students wit mite aged ene
trarPiglish Only requirement. Even bilingual Seu ene
justly ee
ricans see cae
Top Americans semed to justify the curtailing of ome
Sraplingeal education and ethnic studi "OFF ran
ig nd ethnic studies Pe
theta ge SUBe Nesated the civil igh refo moor an Sc
thin nk acters came mich moe ane cai
tik nizations, A re ng
aw profesor Richard Delgado, "The ee ee oct
; ‘lorads
$idation and experiment. Supply
Religion, famil
gion, family val
Delgado, 1996, p. 3),
le and went
(Stefanic and
is not ‘Whether?’ but
fight for bilingual
tudent and faculty
knowledge o
tinas/os believe that
"yan sen in ins
lucation binds J. 61
Cause ASPIRA (New York at
‘ican American 7
‘uerto Ricans had a ong enon tee Pa
ponte emshads song sone ofiseag ee.
York City in tee States in 1898 (Rodi, te toe Bein
PercentofCubansand gsr ea btish at home
ercent of Mex; Ewen
s
suurat and Linguistic Diversity in Education 7
ou
Puerto Rico's isolation from the mainland allowed forthe
3 lage fay a a ee ae tan
role of USS. colonialism and American racism both
nthe pasts
ation of
ea was the
nthe island and on the mainland.
thes havea different experience with racism than other Lat
nae engendering a song sense of infty among Mexicans, The
Fexican Revolution of 1910 conteibuted to the forging of this identity.
The constant waves of Mexicans coming from Mexico have revitalized
‘heir sense of Mexicanness; intermarriage between immigrants and
Sazens has been common throughout the generations. Identity is also
important to Cubans and has been reinforced by their exile status.
Inaddition, most South Americans and Central Americans are recent
arrivals and also have a strong sense of identity, having gone through
sImost 200 years of nation-state building, Salvadorans, for example,
Gome from a densely populated area, and a war and theit collective
migrations to the United States have reinforced Salvadoran identity.
Because of this, the victory of the English Only forces in California
did not end the debate over bilingual education. Thus, as Latinos got
‘more political clout and more of them were elected to office, Latina/o
politicians and organizations began to challenge the act ‘The way they
saw it was that an estimated 1.5 million public school students in Cali-
fornia spoke little, if any, English, and that this problem had to be
addressed. The powerful state senator, Richard Polanco, D-Los Angeles,
chair of the Latino Legislative Caucus in 2001, pushed legislation that
would require “appropriate instruction, curriculum, and materials”
for limited English students (Guthrie, 2002).
Just 12 percent of California’s 1.5 million language minority students
remained in bilingual programs, and this sumber declined without
substantial federal support. One reason for this decline wo the nega-
tive publicity given to bilingual education. Another was the inability
of the state to hire adequately trained Spanish-speaking teachers. Yet
nother reason was that many schoo! districts aie to inform paren!
of the option to keep their children in bilingual programs (Helfand,
2002; Geyer, 2001)
Outof the discourse on bilingual educat
which recognizes that both immersion
been deficient. This camp states that test
that many teachers are not teaching the subject matte
dents to take particularized exams. T
schools and cite the lack of certified teache
ican schools. Because of this, the American’
tiona third camphasemerged,
and bilingual programs have
scores can go either way and
fer by training stu
hey point to the inequality of
ein Latino and African Amer
‘Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)58
nia school districts, alleging that “the state is
sue 1 Ctr ath an inferior education” The ACLU
lion atudents ("Eighteen Calif, School Districts Sued,” 2000).
“The future of bilingual education is uncertain because of the bag,
Iashit produced, Amajor weakness was that from the beginning twas
inadequately funded and higher education was not prepared to tra,
bilingual teachers. It was seen as a Mexican program and thus ing
given importance. Itcame about asa result of inequities and failures
the American educational system. Educators such as Dr. George I. Sin.
chez envisioned a better world where students would be bilingual,
bicultral (Chaudhry 2010) Itwas part of the quest for equality. Finally
cultural diversity cannot be achieved without affirmative action, Mos,
Latinas/os view arguments that race-based criteria are not legitimate
as racist arguments, These court decisions have delayed diversity.
Ovid,
expected
53.8 my,
SUMMING UP
‘The argument of those for bilingual education and diversity is the
following: Most Americans do not know what bilingual education
‘or what cultural diversity are. They are instinctively against both
because they sound foreign and they interpret them as forced integra-
tion. They also oppose affirmative action and faculty diversity because
they fear a loss of control of THEIR institutions. Accordingly, Ameri-
cans feel threatened by other languages and by integrating their fac-
ulties because having an irrational fear of foreigners drives them to
gppose bilingual education and affirmative ation, However this isa
a time when business and government want more people proficient in
foreign languages, 8 —_—_
Saying thatthe reason for opposing bilingual education is based on
the needs ofthe child is disingenuous. The common argument thal
people have succeeded without bilingual education is, ‘open to question.
and thay Pie Many German Americans received bilingual education,
} Were among the most successful of the European immigrants,
Jewish Americans have had Hebaen
lebrew schools that supplemented theit
Publ education, as did Jopanese Americans, and thet ececation did
Not detract from their learning o ¢
icc assimilation into society. Many other
Hee ups a #8 the Italians and Poles, did not have as extensive
What iteomes do Hough ther language barriers
Many studies show they Latina/o children have certain needs.
at students coming from places such as Mexico
cul 50.
lo better in school than US-born Mexicans, and that those coming to
the United States having completed the first six grades do better than
those having completed only one grade. An ability to read in any lan.
guage transfers across languages even when the writing systems are
{isferent. Instead of blaming bilingual education for the system's fail
ure, educators should study what it isin American education that takes
way a child’s motivation to learn. An exposure to other cult
Guces an appreciation for them,
Limited-English-speaking children would benefit from bilingual
education just as most Americans would benefit from knowing two
languages. Latinas/os know that Latina/o children have problems and
that their schools are in bad shape, which is why Latinas/os want to
improve bilingual education. That is why they want to improve teacher
education. Frankly, if the schools were doing an excellent job of edu-
cating non-Latina/o students, it would be easy to say, “Give ita try.” If
those people who oppose bilingual education really had Latina/o
children’s interests in mind, it would be easy to say, “Give it a try.”
However, people who are anti-bilingual usually oppose immigration,
affirmative action, and civil rights.
Society is beyond the times when people would throw their kids into
arriver and tell them to sink or swim. If society wants to help Latinas/os
children, then it needs to provide their parents with better job opportu-
nities, improve housing, bring schools up to the level of the best schools
in the state, and provide certified teachers. Between 1952 and 1972,
government spending for education in schools and colleges increased
more than 700 percent, from $8.4 billion to $675 billion. During that
Period, the school median of white students increased substantially. It
‘was not until the 19705, when Latinos and other minorities started to
approach a majority in many local school districts dominated by white
school board! officials, that support for education was abandoned.
tures pro-
Does family income play a role in the success or failure of
Latina/o students in school? Who has more of a
responsibility: the schools or the parents?
The irony is that despite wasted money and wasted years, diversity
will come about but only after struggle. The Latina/o population will
{ontinue to grow. They already number 85 million. They will even-
{ually question the competency of the system to produce competent
jgnets: Diversity is part of the solution, not having whites eating
jalapenos,