The Militarization of Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive

Analysis
Executive Summary

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the military domain is ushering in
a transformative era of warfare. This report examines the multifaceted implications of
this militarization, encompassing the current applications of AI in autonomous
weapons systems and cybersecurity, the emergence of a new global arms race fueled
by AI development, and the significant ethical, legal, and strategic challenges that
arise. The analysis delves into specific case studies, such as the role of companies like
Palantir, and draws historical parallels with previous technological revolutions in
warfare to provide context. Ultimately, the report considers future trends in AI's
impact on military strategy and global security, offering policy recommendations to
mitigate the associated risks and promote responsible development.

Introduction: The Inexorable Rise of Artificial Intelligence in the Military Domain

Artificial intelligence stands as a transformative technology with the potential to

reshape numerous aspects of human endeavor, and its increasing relevance in the
military sphere is undeniable. The capacity of AI to process vast amounts of data,
identify complex patterns, and enable autonomous decision-making presents
compelling advantages for defense organizations worldwide. However, the dual-use
nature of AI, capable of enhancing both civilian and military applications, necessitates
a thorough understanding of its implications for global security. The urgency of this
understanding grows as nations invest heavily in AI for defense, potentially leading to
a paradigm shift in military operations and international relations. This report aims to
provide a comprehensive analysis of the militarization of AI, exploring its current state,
future trajectory, and the multifaceted challenges it presents to global security and
international law. The key areas covered will include the integration of AI in warfare,
the fueling of a new global arms race, the ethical, legal, and strategic dilemmas
posed, relevant case studies, historical parallels, and future trends along with policy
recommendations.

Overview of AI in Warfare: A Paradigm Shift

Current Integration of AI in Military Operations

The integration of artificial intelligence into military operations is rapidly evolving,

impacting both the development of autonomous weapon systems and the
enhancement of cybersecurity capabilities.

Autonomous Weapons Systems: Capabilities and Concerns

Autonomous weapon systems (AWS), also referred to as Lethal Autonomous Weapon

Systems (LAWS), represent a nascent class of military technology. These systems,
once activated, possess the capability to independently conduct military missions
without direct human intervention.1 They leverage advancements in artificial
intelligence (AI) and robotics to autonomously detect targets, navigate complex
combat environments, and make battlefield decisions.1 While the theoretical potential
of such systems is significant, there is currently no publicly available evidence to
suggest that fully autonomous weapon systems have been deployed in combat by any
nation.1 Instances such as the reported use of AI-powered munitions by Ukrainian
forces, like the American-built Switchblade drones, and the alleged autonomous
engagement of combatants by a Turkish-built Kargu 2 drone during the Libyan civil
war in 2020, are not indicative of full autonomy.1 In these cases, human operators
were still required to select targets and issue commands, with the AI's autonomy
limited to assisting in target recognition and navigation.1

Despite the current lack of fully autonomous deployment, many American defense
officials consider autonomous weapon systems vital for bolstering the United States'
conventional military deterrent, particularly against potential adversaries like China.1
The concern is that in a conflict scenario, such as a potential attack on Taiwan, China's
People's Liberation Army might employ electronic and kinetic attacks to disrupt allied
command and control networks. This disruption could severely limit the ability of U.S.
forces to effectively track targets and coordinate counterattacks.1 In such a scenario,
large swarms of attritable autonomous weapon systems could offer a strategic
advantage. These systems could reduce the reliance on vulnerable electronic links
connecting unmanned platforms to human operators, potentially offset the numerical
superiority of an adversary's forces, and execute attacks with greater efficiency and
speed compared to manned systems.1 Recognizing this potential, the U.S. Department
of Defense has been actively working to expedite the development of autonomous
weapon systems across various warfighting domains, alongside developing
countermeasures against adversary drones and autonomous systems.1 To ensure the
responsible and rapid fielding of these technologies, the U.S. Department of Defense
continues to advance the underlying AI and robotic technologies, ensure their
compliance with the law of armed conflict, and refine the policies governing their
development and use.1 The ongoing discourse surrounding AWS often evokes the
image of "killer robots," yet the present reality indicates a more gradual integration of
AI to augment human control in weapon systems, rather than a complete replacement
in combat scenarios. This suggests an evolutionary pathway toward greater
autonomy, rather than an immediate and radical shift.

Cybersecurity Applications: Enhancing Defense and Offense

In the digital age, cybersecurity has become a fundamental component of military

operations, with artificial intelligence playing an increasingly critical role in both
defensive and offensive cyber strategies.3 The sophistication and frequency of
cybersecurity threats are constantly escalating, and AI provides the necessary tools to
detect, prevent, and respond to these threats at the scale and speed required.3 By
leveraging AI, militaries can enhance their ability to protect sensitive data, secure
critical infrastructure, and even disrupt adversarial systems through cyber warfare.3
AI-driven systems are employed to continuously monitor network activities, identify
patterns indicative of cyber assaults, and develop effective countermeasures to
mitigate these risks.4 For instance, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
Agency (CISA) utilizes AI for various purposes, including anomaly detection in network
data through its CyberSentry program, which employs unsupervised machine learning
to identify trends and potential threats for analyst review.5 AI is also used for
automated Personally Identifiable Information (PII) detection and review processes,
enhancing efficiency and compliance with privacy regulations.5

Operation Glowing Symphony, a component of the broader campaign against the

Islamic State (IS), serves as a notable example of the integration of AI and cyber tools
to achieve strategic objectives in the information domain.6 This operation
demonstrated how offensive cyber capabilities, potentially enhanced by AI-driven
analysis, could disrupt and degrade an adversary's information dissemination
networks.6 The ability of AI to analyze vast amounts of data quickly and accurately
allows for improved situational awareness and decision-making in the cyber domain.6
Furthermore, defensive AI is becoming increasingly necessary to counter adversaries
who may employ AI-generated deepfakes and synthetic media to spread
misinformation and undermine public trust.6 The proactive identification of
vulnerabilities and the prediction of attacks, facilitated by AI, represent a significant
shift towards a more dynamic and adaptive posture in cyber defense.

Examples of AI-Driven Systems in Use

The integration of AI into military operations is evident in a growing number of systems

currently in use, spanning various domains from aerial vehicles to missile defense.

Autonomous Drones and Vehicles

Autonomous drones have become increasingly sophisticated, moving beyond simple
remote-controlled devices to AI-powered systems capable of performing a wide
range of tasks. These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are utilized for
reconnaissance missions, providing critical surveillance data, and even for targeted
strikes, all with reduced or no direct human control.7 The US Air Force's Skyborg
project exemplifies this trend, aiming to develop autonomous drone wingmen that can
fly alongside manned aircraft, offering support and enhancing pilot capabilities.7
Project Maven, another significant initiative, employs AI to analyze the vast amounts of
video footage captured by drones, automatically identifying and classifying objects of
interest. This significantly reduces the workload for human analysts and accelerates
the process of threat identification.7 The advancements in drone technology are rapid,
with the potential for future drones to make decisions instantaneously during conflict
without requiring human input.2 Beyond aerial systems, Unmanned Ground Vehicles
(UGVs) are also being equipped with AI for various purposes. These autonomous land
vehicles can operate in challenging and hostile environments, proving instrumental in
tasks such as mine detection, explosive disposal, resupply missions, and providing
combat support. AI algorithms enable UGVs to recognize obstacles, avoid hazards,
and respond to threats in real-time, minimizing risks to human personnel.3

AI in Targeting and Missile Defense

Artificial intelligence is significantly enhancing the precision and effectiveness of

military targeting systems. AI-powered systems can process images, videos, and
infrared data to accurately identify enemy assets, thereby improving target
identification accuracy and reducing the occurrence of false positives and the risk of
collateral damage.4 The US Navy's Aegis Combat System serves as a prime example,
utilizing AI to simultaneously track over 100 targets and make real-time decisions
about which threats to engage with onboard weaponry, significantly bolstering ship
defense against aerial threats.7 Missile defense systems like the Terminal High Altitude
Area Defense (THAAD) also leverage AI to enhance their capabilities. THAAD uses AI
to track incoming ballistic missiles, discriminate between actual projectiles and
decoys, and calculate the optimal interception trajectory for defensive maneuvers.7
Furthermore, Israel has reportedly employed the "Lavender" AI system in the conflict
in Gaza to identify a substantial number of Hamas targets, showcasing the increasing
role of AI in target identification processes.2 These examples illustrate a clear
movement towards leveraging AI to increase the speed and accuracy of both
offensive and defensive targeting systems, facilitating faster, AI-assisted decision
cycles in combat scenarios.
AI for Intelligence and Surveillance

AI and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are revolutionizing the way military
intelligence is gathered, analyzed, and utilized. These technologies can process vast
amounts of data collected from diverse sources, including satellite imagery, social
media feeds, and electronic communications, to identify patterns, predict enemy
movements, and assess the effectiveness of military strategies.11 Predictive analytics,
powered by AI, can help military commanders anticipate potential attacks or identify
behavioral patterns associated with threats.11 By analyzing extensive historical data, AI
algorithms can uncover patterns and trends that human analysts might overlook,
enabling more timely and accurate assessments of conflict dynamics.11 AI's ability to
rapidly process and analyze satellite imagery and drone data allows for the swift
identification of unusual activity or changes in terrain, providing a significant
advantage in maintaining situational awareness and facilitating more agile and
informed decision-making.8 This capability to process and interpret massive datasets
for intelligence purposes signifies a profound shift towards data-driven military
operations, potentially leading to more proactive and informed strategic choices.

Other Applications

Beyond autonomous systems and intelligence gathering, AI is being integrated into

various other aspects of military operations. In logistics and supply chain
management, AI and ML algorithms are used to optimize processes, predict
equipment and personnel requirements, identify efficient transportation routes, and
minimize the risk of disruptions.11 Military training and simulation exercises are being
transformed by AI, providing realistic and adaptive training environments for soldiers
and commanders through virtual reality simulations powered by AI algorithms.4 AI is
also finding applications in medical support and battlefield healthcare, with
AI-powered diagnostic systems capable of analyzing medical data to assist
healthcare providers in diagnosing injuries and recommending treatment options in
real-time.11 Additionally, AI-powered real-time translation tools are being utilized to
enhance communication between U.S. soldiers and allied forces or local populations
in multinational operations, breaking down language barriers that could impede
military effectiveness.7

Emerging AI Technologies Shaping Modern Warfare

The landscape of military AI is continuously evolving, with several emerging

technologies poised to further transform modern warfare.
Agentic AI and Autonomous Decision-Making

A newly developed type of AI, known as 'Agentic AI', has the potential to
fundamentally restructure how defense systems operate. Unlike typical Generative AI,
Agentic AI employs a “sense-think-act” system, enabling it to take independent
actions without human intervention, thereby potentially allowing for more efficient
responses to complex demands.14 The rapid integration of AI into various military
applications, including these more autonomous forms, highlights the ongoing
development of AI-driven military capabilities and underscores the existing regulatory
gaps in this rapidly advancing field.15 The emergence of Agentic AI suggests a future
where AI systems can operate with greater autonomy in complex and dynamic
situations, potentially leading to faster and more adaptive military responses.
However, this increased autonomy also raises significant concerns regarding control
and accountability, demanding careful consideration of the ethical and legal
implications.

AI in Information Warfare and Psychological Operations

AI technologies are dramatically changing the landscape of information warfare. They

offer unprecedented capabilities in generating targeted information aligned with
specific narratives and in analyzing massive volumes of data to predict adversary
maneuvers.6 This allows for enhanced situational awareness and decision-making,
although it also presents the risk of overwhelming decision-makers with excessive
information.6 Weaponized AI can generate deceptive information, potentially leading
adversarial AI to incorrect conclusions and misleading human decision-makers.6
Furthermore, AI can facilitate the analysis of the psychological characteristics of
target groups, enabling more effective and focused psychological operations.6 The
ability of AI to create and disseminate disinformation and misinformation, including
highly convincing fake content, poses a significant challenge in modern conflict.16 To
counter these threats, the development and deployment of defensive AI systems
capable of detecting and neutralizing AI-generated deepfakes and misinformation
campaigns are becoming increasingly crucial.6 The sophisticated capabilities of AI in
information warfare represent a significant evolution, allowing for more nuanced and
potentially more impactful manipulation of information and public opinion during times
of conflict.

The New Global Arms Race: A Quest for AI Supremacy

AI as a Driver of Evolving Military Strategies

The integration of artificial intelligence is fundamentally altering military strategies
across the globe, with AI increasingly viewed as an indispensable component for the
modernization of armed forces.2 China's national defense strategy, outlined in its 2019
white paper, champions the concept of “intelligentized warfare,” emphasizing the vital
role of leveraging AI in the modernization plans of the People's Liberation Army.17 In
response, the United States has focused on restricting China's access to advanced
semiconductors, which are crucial for developing sophisticated AI models, driven by
concerns about bolstering Beijing's cutting-edge military AI capabilities.17 Russia's
ongoing conflict in Ukraine has already demonstrated how AI is shaping military
strategies and national security, with the conflict being described as an "AI war lab"
where civilian tech firms are experimenting with AI tools and playing significant roles
in military operations.17 The increasing emphasis on AI in national defense strategies
by major global powers signifies a profound shift in how future conflicts may be
approached, with technological superiority in AI becoming a critical factor in
determining military strength and strategic advantage.

Escalating Global Competition in AI-Powered Defense

The pursuit of military AI technology has ignited what many are calling a "Military AI
Gold Rush," with major powers such as the United States and China engaged in a
high-stakes competition for technological dominance.17 This escalating weaponization
of AI has drawn parallels with the nuclear arms race of the Cold War, where
automated weapons systems are increasingly seen as the new frontier of military
power.2 In 2017, a stark warning was issued in an open letter to the United Nations
from over 126 CEOs and founders of artificial intelligence and robotics companies,
imploring states to prevent the emergence of an arms race for autonomous weapons
systems.2 This global competition in AI-powered defense suggests a potentially
dangerous cycle of competitive build-up, mirroring the dynamics of past arms races
and raising concerns about increased international instability.

Comparative Analysis of National Investments in AI Defense Technologies

Global spending on drone and AI development is increasing at a rapid pace, reflecting

the strategic importance nations are placing on these technologies.2 The United
States has made it a priority to accelerate the adoption of advanced AI capabilities to
ensure its forces maintain decision superiority on the battlefield.19 China is also
making substantial investments in AI for military purposes, viewing it as critical to
eroding the technological and operational advantages of potential adversaries.21
Russia, as outlined in a 2021 report by its Ministry of Defense, has plans to incorporate
AI into various military operations, including reconnaissance and combat, as part of its
broader military modernization strategy.22 These significant investments by major
military powers underscore the escalating competition in the field of AI defense
technologies and the strategic imperative to gain a competitive edge in this domain.

Geopolitical Implications: Increased International Tensions and the Risk of

Conflict

The integration of AI into defense is significantly reshaping global power dynamics,

impacting not only military strength but also economic competitiveness, information
warfare capabilities, and surveillance systems, which can lead to increased
international tensions.22 The potential for AI to be leveraged by non-state armed
groups could also inject an element of instability into the geopolitical landscape.23
Concerns have been raised by Chinese defense experts that the accelerating pace of
AI-enabled military operations, coupled with the potential delegation of
decision-making to machines, could heighten the risk of conflicts spiraling out of
control.24 The development and deployment of AI in defense is not merely a
technological advancement; it represents a fundamental geopolitical shift with the
potential to destabilize existing power balances and elevate the risk of miscalculation
and conflict among nations.

The Elusive Pursuit of International Arms Control Measures

Regulating the weaponization of AI presents a complex challenge due to the

technology's rapid pace of development, its inherent technical complexity, and its
dual-use nature, meaning it has both civilian and military applications.18 For over a
decade, a multilateral policy debate has been underway at the United Nations
concerning the regulation of autonomous weapon systems under the Convention on
Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW).26 In a significant step, the UN General
Assembly adopted its first resolution on AWS in 2023, requesting member states to
submit their views on the topic.16 The UN Secretary-General has also called for the
conclusion of a legally binding instrument by 2026 to regulate all types of autonomous
weapon systems and to outright ban LAWS that operate without human control or
oversight and cannot comply with international humanitarian law.18 While the pursuit of
arms control measures faces considerable hurdles, AI itself may offer potential
solutions by assisting in arms control verification through advanced data analysis and
language translation capabilities.28 Despite these potential avenues, establishing
effective international arms control measures for AI in the military domain remains a
complex and challenging endeavor, complicated by technological factors and the
divergent national security interests of various states.
Navigating the Complexities: Ethical, Legal, and Strategic Challenges

The Thorny Ethical Dilemmas Surrounding Autonomous Weapons and AI

Decision-Making in Conflict

The integration of artificial intelligence into military operations, particularly in the

realm of autonomous weapons, raises profound ethical questions concerning
accountability, moral responsibility, potential bias, discrimination, and the fundamental
issue of human control over the use of force.

Accountability and Moral Responsibility

One of the most pressing ethical dilemmas surrounding autonomous weapons is the
question of accountability when these systems make decisions that result in harm or
loss of life.8 Delegating life-and-death decisions to machines raises concerns about
the erosion of human dignity in warfare.11 Establishing clear accountability structures
for the actions of autonomous weapons is a significant challenge, especially in the
absence of direct human control over target selection and engagement.8 The
increasing reliance on AI-enabled targeting systems can also weaken the moral
agency of human operators due to automation bias, potentially diminishing their
capacity for ethical decision-making.31 A core ethical dilemma lies in the potential for
an accountability gap when autonomous systems make lethal decisions, prompting
critical questions about who is morally and legally responsible for unintended
consequences or violations of the laws of war.

Potential for Bias and Discrimination

AI systems are trained on vast amounts of data, and if this data contains biases, the AI
can inherit and even amplify these prejudices, leading to unfair or discriminatory
outcomes.29 In a military context, this could manifest in AI systems singling out certain
ethnic groups or incorrectly classifying civilians as combatants due to biases
embedded in the training data.32 Algorithmic bias presents a significant ethical
challenge, as it could lead to discriminatory targeting and exacerbate existing
inequalities in conflict situations, undermining the fundamental principles of
non-discrimination enshrined in International Humanitarian Law.

Erosion of Human Control

As AI systems become more autonomous, concerns about the potential loss of human
control over their actions have grown.29 Maintaining meaningful human control over
the use of force is considered crucial to upholding ethical and legal standards in
warfare.16 The prospect of "human-out-of-the-loop" systems, particularly in sensitive
areas like nuclear command and control, raises serious ethical and strategic
questions.37 The gradual delegation of decision-making authority to AI raises concerns
about the level of human oversight and intervention, especially in situations involving
the potential use of lethal force, and the increased risk of unintended escalation or
miscalculation.

The Labyrinth of Legal Challenges in Regulating AI-Driven Military Technologies

The integration of AI into military technologies presents a complex web of legal

challenges, particularly in defining accountability for the actions of autonomous
systems and ensuring the protection of civilians under the framework of International
Humanitarian Law.

Defining Accountability in Autonomous Systems

Regulating AI-driven military technologies poses significant legal challenges,

especially concerning the assignment of accountability for their actions.25 Unlike
traditional weapons operated under direct human control, AI systems function
autonomously based on algorithmic decision-making, making it difficult to attribute
intent, a critical element in criminal law, particularly in the context of war crimes.30 The
concept of command responsibility, which holds military commanders accountable for
the actions of their subordinates, may serve as a starting point for addressing legal
accountability in the context of autonomous weapons.27 However, existing legal
frameworks, primarily designed for human actors, struggle to adequately address the
unique challenges presented by AI-driven systems, necessitating either the
development of new legal principles or the adaptation of current laws to effectively
govern their use.

Ensuring Civilian Protection Under International Humanitarian Law

A fundamental legal challenge lies in ensuring that AI systems used in military

operations comply with the core principles of International Humanitarian Law (IHL),
such as the principles of distinction between combatants and civilians and the
principle of proportionality in the use of force.16 Concerns have been raised about the
ability of autonomous weapons to effectively distinguish between combatants and
civilians in complex and dynamic battlefield environments.2 The "black box" nature of
many AI algorithms, where the decision-making process is opaque, further
complicates the assessment of their compliance with IHL.35 To address these
challenges, some propose the development of adaptive legal reviews that can be
applied throughout the entire lifecycle of AI-enabled Lethal Autonomous Weapon
Systems (AI-LAWS) to continuously assess the risk of target misclassification and
ensure adherence to IHL principles.40 Ensuring the protection of civilians remains a
critical legal hurdle, as AI systems may lack the nuanced contextual understanding
and human judgment necessary to consistently adhere to the principles of IHL in all
situations.

The Perils of Speed and Autonomy: Potential Risks of Rapid, AI-Mediated

Responses

The speed and autonomy offered by artificial intelligence in military applications carry
potential risks, particularly the increased likelihood of unintended escalation and
miscalculations in conflict situations.

Unintended Escalation and Miscalculations

The ability of AI to facilitate rapid, automated responses in military contexts raises

concerns about the potential for unintended escalation of conflicts or serious
miscalculations.24 The accelerated pace of AI-enabled operations could lead to
situations where human decision-makers have less time to assess threats and
consider the broader strategic implications of their actions, potentially causing
conflicts to spiral out of control.24 The inherent complexity and at times, lack of
explainability in advanced AI systems also increase the risk of unexpected behavior or
technical failures that could lead to accidents or misinterpretations of an adversary's
actions.24 The delegation of decision-making to lethal autonomous weapons systems
on the battlefield could further exacerbate these risks, potentially leading to
escalatory dynamics that threaten strategic stability.24 The reliance on AI for rapid
military responses necessitates careful consideration of the potential for
misinterpretations, technical vulnerabilities, and unforeseen interactions that could
inadvertently escalate tensions and lead to broader conflict.

Vulnerabilities to Cyberattacks and Manipulation

The increasing reliance on AI in military systems also creates new vulnerabilities,

particularly in the realm of cybersecurity. Adversaries could potentially exploit
weaknesses in AI systems through cyberattacks, gaining access to sensitive
information or even manipulating the behavior of automated weapons platforms.8
There is a risk that adversarial techniques could be employed in a conflict to alter the
source code of AI-powered targeting assistance systems, causing them to, for
example, misidentify civilian infrastructure as legitimate military targets.18 These
vulnerabilities highlight the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect
AI-driven military systems from malicious actors who might seek to compromise their
functionality or exploit them for their own strategic advantage, potentially leading to
catastrophic consequences in conflict scenarios.

Illuminating the Landscape: Case Studies and Industry Examples

Palantir: A Key Player in Military AI Development and Deployment

Palantir Technologies has emerged as a significant player in the development and

deployment of artificial intelligence for the United States military. The company
provides a range of software platforms that enable data integration and offer
AI-powered tools to enhance battlespace awareness and improve the precision of
targeting.17 Palantir's technology played a pivotal role in Project Convergence, a major
US Army exercise focused on distributed collaboration and advanced battlespace
management, providing a unified data infrastructure for planning, executing, and
assessing operations effectively.44 Palantir is also involved in key Army programs such
as the Army Intelligence Data Platform (AIDP) and the Tactical Intelligence Targeting
Access Node (TITAN) program, which has been described as the “first AI-defined
vehicle”.44 Furthermore, Palantir offers its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) for
Defense, which is designed to enable defense organizations to responsibly and
securely deploy AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) for their most critical
missions.48 Palantir's deep integration with various aspects of US military operations
underscores the close collaboration between the defense sector and private
technology companies in advancing AI capabilities.

The Growing Influence of Private Sector Innovation on State-Led Military

Initiatives

Innovation in the private sector is increasingly becoming a driving force behind

advancements in military artificial intelligence.17 AI technology, by its nature, often has
dual-use applications, meaning that systems initially developed for civilian purposes
can be adapted and repurposed to serve military objectives.17 This close relationship
between civilian and military AI development raises important ethical and legal
considerations for the private technology sector, particularly concerning their
responsibilities during times of conflict.17 The rapid pace of innovation within the
private AI industry is significantly impacting military capabilities, leading to a growing
reliance on commercially available technologies and expertise. This trend highlights
the need for careful consideration of the ethical implications and potential risks
associated with the increasing militarization of AI developed in the private sector.

Ethical Considerations for Tech Companies in Defense

Tech companies involved in AI development are facing complex ethical decisions

regarding their engagement with the defense sector. OpenAI, for example, revised its
usage guidelines in January 2024 to lift previous restrictions that had explicitly barred
its technology from being used for applications related to weapons development and
military warfare, marking a significant shift in corporate policy.17 This decision, along
with the broader debate within the technology industry about the ethical implications
of supporting national security with AI technologies, underscores the challenging
balance between fostering innovation and addressing potential risks and societal
impacts.49 Tech companies must carefully navigate these ethical considerations as
they contribute to the rapidly evolving field of military AI.

Drawing from the Past: Historical Parallels and Lessons Learned

Echoes of the Gunpowder Revolution: Transforming the Nature of Warfare

The integration of artificial intelligence into military operations bears striking parallels
with the introduction of gunpowder, both representing fundamental shifts in the way
wars are fought.2 Just as gunpowder revolutionized warfare by enabling ranged
combat and reducing the reliance on close-quarters fighting, AI is transforming
military capabilities by enabling autonomous systems and enhancing decision-making
processes from a distance.51 The advent of gunpowder led to significant changes in
military tactics and strategies, including the decline of traditional siege warfare and
the development of new fortifications designed to withstand artillery fire.51 Similarly, AI
is prompting a re-evaluation of military doctrine and the development of new
operational concepts to leverage its unique capabilities. The gunpowder revolution
serves as a historical precedent for how a transformative technology can
fundamentally alter the conduct of war, necessitating significant adaptation in military
thinking and strategic planning.

The Specter of the Nuclear Arms Race: Implications for AI Militarization

The current global competition in the development of AI for military purposes has
drawn comparisons to the Cold War nuclear arms race, highlighting the potential for
escalating competition and increased international instability.2 The development and
potential use of nuclear weapons carry catastrophic humanitarian consequences,
underscoring the imperative to avoid similar risks associated with the militarization of
AI.60 While there are fundamental differences between AI and nuclear weapons, such
as the relative ease with which AI models can be copied and disseminated compared
to the complex and highly controlled nature of nuclear materials 17, the historical
experience of the nuclear arms race offers valuable lessons about the inherent
dangers of unchecked technological competition in the military domain and the
urgent need for effective arms control and risk mitigation strategies to prevent
unintended escalation and ensure global security.

Analyzing Patterns of Technological Disruption in Military History

Military history is punctuated by periods of significant technological disruption that

have fundamentally altered the nature of warfare, often referred to as Revolutions in
Military Affairs (RMAs).59 These RMAs are not solely driven by technological
advancements but also by the innovative ways in which these technologies are
integrated into military doctrine, organization, and operations. Examples include the
German military's use of the air-tank combination during the early stages of World
War II and the more recent precision warfare revolution enabled by electronic
technologies.65 Analyzing these historical patterns of technological disruption can
provide valuable insights into the potential long-term impacts of AI on military
doctrine, force structure, and the overall balance of power among nations.
Understanding how past technological shifts have reshaped warfare can help
anticipate the profound changes that AI is likely to bring to the future of conflict.

Charting the Future: Trends and Recommendations

Predicting the Transformative Impact of AI on Military Strategy and Global

Security

Artificial intelligence is poised to fundamentally transform military strategy and global

security in the coming years. It is expected that AI will permeate across virtually all
military systems and processes, leading to significant efficiency gains in data
processing, enhanced situational awareness through advanced analytics, and an
overall increase in the speed of warfare.21 By the year 2030, AI is anticipated to play a
crucial role in reshaping how defense organizations manage resources, make critical
decisions, and execute complex missions across a multitude of domains.68
Furthermore, AI has the potential to significantly enhance decision support, real-time
analysis, and communication capabilities within the sensitive realm of nuclear
command and control systems.37 This transformative impact suggests that AI will not
only alter tactical operations but will also influence strategic decision-making at the
highest levels, potentially redefining the very nature of conflict in the future.
Policy Recommendations for Mitigating Risks and Fostering Responsible AI
Development

To navigate the complex challenges and harness the potential benefits of AI in the
military domain, several policy recommendations warrant consideration.

Establishing International Norms and Legal Frameworks

There is a pressing need to establish robust international norms and legally binding
frameworks to govern the development and use of AI in the military. This includes
advocating for the development of an international instrument to regulate and, where
necessary, prohibit autonomous weapons systems.16 It is also crucial to support the
establishment of globally recognized ethical and legal standards for the application of
AI in the military domain.18 Fostering international cooperation and sustained dialogue
among nations is essential to build consensus on the responsible governance of AI in
this critical context.18

Promoting Transparency and Explainability in AI Systems

To ensure accountability and build trust in AI-driven military systems, it is vital to

promote transparency and explainability in their operation. This can be achieved by
emphasizing the development and deployment of explainable AI (XAI) technologies
that allow human operators to understand the reasoning behind AI-generated
insights.9 Additionally, designing AI models that meticulously log their decision-making
processes and undergo regular, independent audits can further enhance
accountability and reliability.9

Maintaining Meaningful Human Control Over Lethal Force

Preserving meaningful human control over decisions involving the use of lethal force
must remain a paramount principle in the development and deployment of
AI-powered weapon systems.16 A balanced approach is necessary, one that prohibits
the deployment of weapon systems that select and engage targets without direct
human control, while also ensuring that other AI-enhanced systems operate in full
compliance with International Humanitarian Law under human supervision.16

Investing in Research on AI Safety and Security

Continued investment in research focused on AI safety and security is crucial to

mitigating the potential risks associated with its militarization. This includes
supporting the development of robust safeguards and best practices aimed at
reducing the likelihood of catastrophic AI failures.41 Promoting international
collaboration on mutually beneficial technical safeguards and the establishment of
common standards for AI safety can further enhance global security.41 Additionally,
investing in the development of resilient AI systems equipped with fail-safe
mechanisms and adaptive learning capabilities is essential to ensuring their reliability
and preventing unintended consequences.9

Conclusion: Towards a Future of Responsible AI in Defense

The militarization of artificial intelligence presents both unprecedented opportunities

and significant risks to global security. While AI offers the potential to enhance military
capabilities, improve decision-making, and potentially reduce human casualties, it
also raises profound ethical, legal, and strategic challenges that demand careful
consideration and proactive measures. Navigating this complex landscape requires a
balanced approach that seeks to harness the potential benefits of AI while diligently
mitigating its inherent risks. International cooperation, the establishment of clear
ethical and legal frameworks, a commitment to transparency and human control, and
sustained investment in AI safety and security are essential to shaping a future where
AI contributes to a more secure and stable world. Responsible innovation and a
collaborative global effort are paramount in ensuring that the transformative power of
artificial intelligence in the defense domain is guided by principles of humanity,
accountability, and the pursuit of peace.

Works cited

1.​ What are Autonomous Weapon Systems? - Belfer Center, accessed on April 6,
2025, https://www.belfercenter.org/what-are-autonomous-weapon-systems
2.​ AI & The Future of Conflict | GJIA, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2024/07/12/war-artificial-intelligence-and-the-future
-of-conflict/
3.​ AI in Military Applications - Unaligned Newsletter, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.unaligned.io/p/ai-in-military-applications
4.​ How Artificial Intelligence (AI) is Evolving the Future of Military ..., accessed on
April 6, 2025,
https://www.parangat.com/how-artificial-intelligence-ai-is-evolving-the-future-o
f-military-defense-approaches/
5.​ CISA Artificial Intelligence Use Cases, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.cisa.gov/ai/cisa-use-cases
6.​ Exploring Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Cyber and Information Operations
Integration, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archiv
es/March-April-2025/AI-Cyber-Information-Operations-Integration/
7.​ 10 examples of AI being used in Defense Sector [2025] - DigitalDefynd, accessed
on April 6, 2025, https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/ai-use-in-defense-sector/
8.​ AI on the Battlefield: How Artificial Intelligence is Shaping Modern Warfare -
Mobix Labs, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.mobixlabs.com/post/ai-on-the-battlefield-how-artificial-intelligence-
is-shaping-new-military-defense-technologies
9.​ Advancing AI in Defense Organizations | TechAhead, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.techaheadcorp.com/blog/advancing-ai-in-defense-organizations/
10.​Artificial Intelligence as a Combat Multiplier: Using AI to Unburden Army Staffs,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2024
-OLE/AI-Combat-Multiplier/
11.​ Navigating the AI battlefield: Opportunities and ethical frontiers - NRDC Italy,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.nrdc-ita.nato.int/newsroom/insights/navigating-the-ai-battlefield-op
portunities--challenges--and-ethical-frontiers-in-modern-warfare
12.​Artificial Intelligence in Military Technology - 8 Applications ..., accessed on April
6, 2025,
https://www.flysight.it/artificial-intelligence-in-military-technology-8-applications
-examples/
13.​How Is AI Used in the Military to Enhance Combat Strategies? - NSIN, accessed on
April 6, 2025, https://www.nsin.us/how-is-ai-used-in-the-military/
14.​Emerging Technology Trends In Defense and Aviation Shaping ..., accessed on
April 6, 2025,
https://www.cevians.com/emerging-technology-trends-in-defense-and-aviation-
shaping-modern-warfare/
15.​AI-Enabled Autonomous Weapons: Transforming Modern Warfare | EM360Tech,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://em360tech.com/tech-articles/ai-enabled-autonomous-weapons-transfor
ming-modern-warfare
16.​The Integration of AI in Modern Warfare: Ethical, Legal, and Practical Implications,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.cyis.org/post/the-integration-of-ai-in-modern-warfare-ethical-legal
-and-practical-implications
17.​Governing Military AI Amid a Geopolitical Minefield | Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/07/governing-military-ai-amid-a-
geopolitical-minefield?lang=en¢er=europe
18.​Governing Military AI Amid a Geopolitical Minefield | Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/07/governing-military-ai-amid-a-
geopolitical-minefield
19.​DOD Releases AI Adoption Strategy - Department of Defense, accessed on April
6, 2025,
https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3578219/dod-release
 s-ai-adoption-strategy/
20.​Budget Trends and the Future of AI in U.S. Defense, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://dsm.forecastinternational.com/2025/03/11/budget-trends-and-the-future-
of-ai-in-u-s-defense/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=budg
et-trends-and-the-future-of-ai-in-u-s-defense&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=
rss&utm_campaign=budget-trends-and-the-future-of-ai-in-u-s-defense
21.​The Coming Military AI Revolution - Army University Press, accessed on April 6,
2025,
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archiv
es/May-June-2024/MJ-24-Glonek/
22.​AI and the New World Order: Geopolitical Implications - Defence Research and
Studies, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://dras.in/ai-and-the-new-world-order-geopolitical-implications/
23.​For Geopolitics, What AI Can't Do Will Be as Important as What It Can - RAND
Corporation, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2025/04/for-geopolitics-what-ai-cant-d
o-will-be-as-important.html
24.​Could AI Lead to the Escalation of Conflict? PRC Scholars Think So | Lawfare,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/could-ai-lead-to-the-escalation-of-conflict
--prc-scholars-think-so
25.​Militarization of AI Has Severe Implications for Global Security and Warfare,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://unu.edu/article/militarization-ai-has-severe-implications-global-security-a
nd-warfare
26.​Dilemmas in the policy debate on autonomous weapon systems - SIPRI, accessed
on April 6, 2025,
https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2025/dilemmas-policy-d
ebate-autonomous-weapon-systems
27.​Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS): Accountability, Collateral Damage,
and the Inadequacies of International Law - Temple iLIT, accessed on April 6,
2025,
https://law.temple.edu/ilit/lethal-autonomous-weapon-systems-laws-accountabili
ty-collateral-damage-and-the-inadequacies-of-international-law/
28.​AI for Arms Control: How Artificial Intelligence Can Foster Verification and
Support Arms Control - PRIF BLOG, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://blog.prif.org/2022/01/19/ai-for-arms-control-how-artificial-intelligence-ca
n-foster-verification-and-support-arms-control/
29.​Problems with autonomous weapons - Stop Killer Robots, accessed on April 6,
2025,
https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/stop-killer-robots/facts-about-autonomous-we
apons/
30.​Navigating Liability In Autonomous Robots: Legal And Ethical Challenges In
Manufacturing And Military Applications - The Yale Review Of International
Studies, accessed on April 6, 2025,
 https://yris.yira.org/column/navigating-liability-in-autonomous-robots-legal-and-e
thical-challenges-in-manufacturing-and-military-applications/
31.​The ethical implications of AI in warfare - Queen Mary University of London,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/research/featured-research/the-ethical-implications-of-a
i-in-warfare/
32.​Transcending weapon systems: the ethical challenges of AI in military decision
support systems - Blogs | International Committee of the Red Cross, accessed on
April 6, 2025,
https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2024/09/24/transcending-weapon-systems-
the-ethical-challenges-of-ai-in-military-decision-support-systems/
33.​The ethical dilemmas of AI | USC Annenberg School for Communication and
Journalism, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://annenberg.usc.edu/research/center-public-relations/usc-annenberg-relev
ance-report/ethical-dilemmas-ai
34.​The risks and inefficacies of AI systems in military targeting support, accessed on
April 6, 2025,
https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2024/09/04/the-risks-and-inefficacies-of-ai
-systems-in-military-targeting-support/
35.​When AI Meets the Laws of War | IE Insights, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.ie.edu/insights/articles/when-ai-meets-the-laws-of-war/
36.​Artificial intelligence in military decision-making: supporting humans, not
replacing them, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2024/08/29/artificial-intelligence-in-military-
decision-making-supporting-humans-not-replacing-them/
37.​Full article: AI and nuclear decisions: Toward an arms control framework,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2025.2474869?src=
38.​Symposium on Military AI and the Law of Armed Conflict:
De-anthropomorphizing Artificial Intelligence - Grounding Notions of
Accountability in Reality - Opinio Juris, accessed on April 6, 2025,
http://opiniojuris.org/2024/04/05/symposium-on-military-ai-and-the-law-of-arm
ed-conflict-de-anthropomorphizing-artificial-intelligence-grounding-notions-of-
accountability-in-reality/
39.​Regulating Wartime Artificial Intelligence | The Regulatory Review, accessed on
April 6, 2025,
https://www.theregreview.org/2024/04/25/hill-regulating-wartime-artificial-intelli
gence/
40.​The Challenges of AI-Enabled LAWS for Adaptive Legal Reviews - MIAI, accessed
on April 6, 2025,
https://ai-regulation.com/the-challenges-of-ai-enabled-laws-for-adaptive-legal-r
eviews/
41.​Reducing the Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Military Decision Advantage |
Center for Security and Emerging Technology, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/reducing-the-risks-of-artificial-intelligen
 ce-for-military-decision-advantage/
42.​Escalation Risks from LLMs in Military and Diplomatic Contexts | Stanford HAI,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://hai.stanford.edu/policy-brief-escalation-risks-llms-military-and-diplomatic
-contexts
43.​AI Risks: Exploring the Critical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence | Lakera –
Protecting AI teams that disrupt the world., accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.lakera.ai/blog/risks-of-ai
44.​Palantir Joins Forces with U.S. Army for Project Convergence Capstone, accessed
on April 6, 2025,
https://blog.palantir.com/palantir-joins-forces-with-u-s-army-for-project-conver
gence-capstone-19c79f3c748a
45.​Palantir, Anduril form new alliance to merge AI capabilities for defense customers,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://defensescoop.com/2024/12/06/palantir-anduril-consortium-ai-new-allianc
e-merge-capabilities/
46.​US Army extends Palantir's contract for its data-harnessing platform - Defense
News, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.defensenews.com/land/2024/12/18/us-army-extends-palantirs-contr
act-for-its-data-harnessing-platform/
47.​Palantir Defense Solutions | U.S. Army, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.palantir.com/offerings/defense/army/
48.​AIP for Defense - Palantir, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.palantir.com/platforms/aip/defense/
49.​War, AI and the New Global Arms Race | Alexandr Wang | TED - YouTube,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpipswT-LuE&pp=0gcJCfcAhR29_xXO
50.​The Evolution of War: How AI has Changed Military Weaponry and Technology,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://montrealethics.ai/the-evolution-of-war-how-ai-has-changed-military-we
aponry-and-technology/
51.​Gunpowder: Revolutionizing Warfare In The Middle Ages - Medieval History,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://historymedieval.com/gunpowder-revolutionizing-warfare-in-the-middle-a
ges/
52.​How Gunpowder Changed the World | Live Science, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.livescience.com/7476-gunpowder-changed-world.html
53.​Gunpowder - Song Dynasty China | Asia for Educators - Columbia University,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/songdynasty-module/tech-gunpowder.html
54.​Military technology - Gunpowder, Revolution, 1300-1650 | Britannica, accessed
on April 6, 2025,
https://www.britannica.com/technology/military-technology/The-gunpowder-rev
olution-c-1300-1650
55.​History of gunpowder - Wikipedia, accessed on April 6, 2025,
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_gunpowder
56.​historymedieval.com, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://historymedieval.com/gunpowder-revolutionizing-warfare-in-the-middle-a
ges/#:~:text=This%20new%20form%20of%20warfare,opponents%20from%20a
%20safe%20distance.
57.​The New Arms Race - How AI is Reshaping Global Military Power - Avast
Community, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://community.avast.com/t/the-new-arms-race-how-ai-is-reshaping-global-
military-power/881704
58.​Understanding the AI Arms Race: Beyond Competition - Return on Security,
accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.returnonsecurity.com/p/the-globa-ai-arms-race
59.​Full article: Artificial Intelligence: A Revolution in Strategic Affairs? - Taylor and
Francis, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00396338.2018.1518374
60.​What happens if nuclear weapons are used? - ICAN, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.icanw.org/catastrophic_harm
61.​Nuclear weapons | ICRC, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.icrc.org/en/law-and-policy/nuclear-weapons
62.​The Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.ippnw.org/programs/nuclear-weapons-abolition/the-humanitarian-i
mpact-of-nuclear-weapons
63.​Nuclear Weapons - UNODA, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://disarmament.unoda.org/wmd/nuclear/
64.​Humanitarian Impacts - ICAN Australia, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://icanw.org.au/learn/humanitarian-impacts/
65.​Military Innovation on the Global Stage | Lawfare, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/military-innovation-on-the-global-stage
66.​The “AI RMA” - The Andrew W. Marshall Foundation, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.andrewwmarshallfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AIRM
A_FINAL.pdf
67.​Changes in warfare in the 16th and 17th centuries - a 'military revolution'? | Future
Forge, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://theforge.defence.gov.au/article/changes-warfare-16th-and-17th-centuries
-military-revolution
68.​AI in defense | Strategy& - Strategyand.pwc.com, accessed on April 6, 2025,
https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/de/en/industries/aerospace-defense/ai-in-def
ense.html
69.​The AI Governance Arms Race: From Summit Pageantry to Progress?, accessed
on April 6, 2025,
https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/10/the-ai-governance-arms-race
-from-summit-pageantry-to-progress
70.​Future-proofing AI arms control - Atlantische Commissie, accessed on April 6,
2025,
https://www.atlcom.nl/artikel-atlantisch-perspectief/future-proofing-ai-arms-con
 trol/
71.​A.I. Joe: The Dangers of Artificial Intelligence and the Military - Public Citizen,
accessed on April 6, 2025, https://www.citizen.org/article/ai-joe-report/