Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views18 pages

Lecture

The document discusses the Fetkovich Inflow Performance Relationships (IPR) method for analyzing oil and gas well performance, detailing various testing methods such as Flow-After-Flow, Isochronal, and Modified Isochronal tests. It provides equations and examples for calculating flow rates and productivity indices, emphasizing the importance of multiple tests for accurate results. The document concludes with a practical example illustrating the application of the Fetkovich method in determining maximum flow rates and productivity indices.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views18 pages

Lecture

The document discusses the Fetkovich Inflow Performance Relationships (IPR) method for analyzing oil and gas well performance, detailing various testing methods such as Flow-After-Flow, Isochronal, and Modified Isochronal tests. It provides equations and examples for calculating flow rates and productivity indices, emphasizing the importance of multiple tests for accurate results. The document concludes with a practical example illustrating the application of the Fetkovich method in determining maximum flow rates and productivity indices.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Well Performance

Inflow Performance
Relationships (IPR)

Fetkovich IPR
Contents

 Fetkovich Method

 Flow-After-Flow Test

 Isochronal Test

 Modified Isochronal Test

 Fetkovich Method (Vogel’s Form)


Fetkovich Method

 Proposed using Gas-Well Analysis approach


 Isochronal and Flow-after-Flow tests
 Oil well back-pressure curves were found to
follow the same general form of IPR for gas

qo  C  P  P 
wells n
2 2
R wf
Where: C= flow coefficient,
N= exponent depends on well characteristics
that varies between 0.568 and 1.0 for the 40 field tests
analyzed by Fetkovich

J also can be calculated from the following


equation:
Fetkovich Method

qo  C  P  P 
2 2 n
R wf
Since this was originally generated for gas, lets
try to study the applicability of this equation to
oil wells
Darcy equation can be written in an integral form as:
PR
k ro
f p 
0.00708 kh
q  f  p  dp
ln  0.472re / rw   S ' Pwf o B o
Fetkovich Method
 For undersaturated oil reservoirs, the integral
is evaluated over two regions: 
Pb PR
0.00708 kh
qo  C  f1 ( p)dp  C f C '
' '
( p)dp
2 ln  0.472re / rw   S '
Pwf Pb

 Assuming that for P>Pb , kro = 1 and μo and Bo


 
could be considered constant at p  ( P R  Pb ) / 2
 Assuming for P<Pb, the pressure function can
be expressed as linear: f 1  p   ap  b
Substituting and integrating: q o  C 1 P
b
2
 Pwf2   C 2  PR  Pb 
 C P  P 
Fetkovich stated that the composite effect 2 2 n
results in an equation of the form: qo R wf
Two tests are needed to calculate C & n to construct the IPR.
For gas wells, 4 tests are recommended to reduce error.
Fetkovich Method

qo  C  P  P 
2 2 n
R wf

 Taking log of both sides


log q o  log C  PR2  Pwf2 
n

log q o  log C  n log  PR2  Pwf2 


log  P  P   log q o  log C
2 1 2 1
R wf
n n
 A log-log plot of  PR2  Pwf2  Versus q gives a
straight line with slope of (1/n) and intercept of qo=C at
P
R
2
 Pwf2   1
qo
 Value of C can be determined as: C 
P 
n
R
2
P 2
wf
Fetkovich – Well Testing Methods

 Types of tests depends on the stabilization time


which is a function of k of the reservoir:
380 C A
The stabilization time for a well ts  o t
In the center of a circular or ko
Square drainage area:
Where  Porosity A = Drainage area, ft
2

 o Viscosity (cp) Ct = fluid compressibility, psi 1


ts =stab. time in hrs K = permeability to oil, md

 For gas wells, high k reservoir, ts is fairly small. The use


of Conventional Flow-after-flow test is recommended
 Tight Reservoirs, Isochronal Tests is recommended
 Very long ts, Modified Isochronal test is recommended
Flow-after-flow test

• Well is shut-in - qoDrainage area pressure = the average reservoir pressure


• The well is placed on production at a constant rate until Pwf becomes constant
• Once the Pwf is stabilized, the rate is changed and the procedure is repeated
2
• The test is analyzed by plotting P R  Pwf2 verse qo on log-log scale and drawing
the best straight line through the points. n is the reciprocal of the slope of line
Isochronal test

Equal time test

• Well is shut-in - Drainage area pressure = the average reservoir pressure


• The well is placed on production at a constant rate (production time < stabilization ts)
• Shut the well in qand
o
allow the pressure to build up to PR
• Open the well on another rate and measure Pwf at the same time intervals
• Shut the well in again and allow the pressure to build up to PR. Repeat for several rates
2
• The test is analyzed by plotting P R  Pwf2 verse qo on log-log scale, n=1/slope.
One of the rate tests must be stabilized to calculate the C coefficient
Modified Isochronal test

• Very tight reservoirs where Pwf buildup time to PR between flow periods is excessive

• Shut-in time between each flow period equals to the production time

• The static Pwfs may not reach PR


2
• The test is analyzed by plotting P R  Pwfs
2
verse qo on log-log scale. N=1/slope
One of the rate tests must be stabilized to calculate the C coefficient
Example – Fetkovich IPR

 A flow-after-flow test was conducted on an oil


well producing from a reservoir in which average
pressure is 3600 psia The test results were:
Qo Pwf

2630 3170

3830 2897

4970 2440

6400 2150

 Construct a complete IPR for this well and


determine qomax
Example – Solution

Qo
STB/day
Pwf psia P P
R
2 2
wf
psia2

2630 3170 2.99 x 106

3830 2897 4.567 x 106

4970 2440 7.006 x 106

6400 2150 8.338 x 106


Log-Log Plot

10000
1000
9400
1050 7500
Solution
n is the reciprocal of the slope obtained form the log-log plot:
 log qo log 7500  log 1050
n   0.854
 log p 2
log 10  log 10
7 6

C is calculated from the plot and or using the equation:


qo 7500 STB
C   0.0079
 2 2
 P R  pwf 
n
10 7 0.854 Day  psia1.71
 
Therefore, the Inflow Equation becomes:

 
To generate the IPR,
0.854 assume Pwf values
qo  0.0079 * 3600  P 2 2
wf and calculate the
corresponding qo
Maximum flow rate at Pwf = 0:

qo (max)  0.0079 * 3600  0  2


0.854
 9370
STB
D
Generated IPR
4000

3500

3000

2500
Pwf

2000

1500

1000

500

qo  0.0079 * 3600  P 2 2
wf 0.854

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
q
Fetkovich Eqn. in Vogel’s Form

qo  C  P  P 
2 2 n
R wf

 AOFP  C  P  2 n Dividing the two equations to


qo max R eliminate the C coefficient

 
n
qo P 2
P 2


R wf

P 
n
q L max 2
R
n
qo  P   2

 1   wf  
q L max   PR  
Fetkovich Eqn. in Vogel’s Form
Take the limit as the draw down approaches zero (Pwf ~ PR):
J PR
q L max  Then:
2
Application of this

qL 
J PR  P  
1   wf  
2 n
equation or
requires:

qo  C PR  Pwf
2 2 n

2   PR   • two stabilized production tests for flow-after flow
• two transient tests and one stabilized rate test
• If only ONE stabilized test is available, assume
n=1 and either C or J can be calculated directly
Taking the log of both sides of the above equation would results in:
 J Pb    P 2 
log q L  log    n log 1    
wf

 2    Pb  
  Pwf 
2

A plot of 1     verse qL on a log-log scale would result in a straight
  Pb  
2q L
J 
line having a slope equal to n. A value  2

n
  Pwf 
of J can then be calculated using any point P R 1  
 P 
 
on the linear plot from: 
  b  

Example

A well test was conducted on a well located in a reservoir with average


Reservoir pressure 2085 psig. The test data are: rate= 2820 STBD at
A Pwf of 1765 psig.
Calculate the Productivity Index (J) using Fetkovich method.

Solution:
Since we have only one test, we can assume that n = 1, then

2 * 2820 STB
J  9.5
  1780  2 
1
D  psi
21001    
  2100  
Maximum rate (AOF) can be calculated when Pwf = 0:
2 n
   Pwf  
J * P R 1    
  Pb   9.5 * 2100 STB
qL (max)    9980
2 2 D

You might also like