Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views12 pages

Descrip

The document presents results from paired-sample t-tests evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention on self-regulated learning (SRL) levels. Significant improvements were observed in various dimensions of SRL, with p-values less than 0.001 across all measures, indicating strong statistical significance. The mean scores increased from pre-test to post-test, demonstrating the intervention's positive impact on participants' learning strategies.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views12 pages

Descrip

The document presents results from paired-sample t-tests evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention on self-regulated learning (SRL) levels. Significant improvements were observed in various dimensions of SRL, with p-values less than 0.001 across all measures, indicating strong statistical significance. The mean scores increased from pre-test to post-test, demonstrating the intervention's positive impact on participants' learning strategies.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Table #.

Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

Pre_test -
Pair 1 -19.200 7.021 2.220 -24.222 -14.178 -8.648 9 .000
Post_test

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for levels of SRL (Self-Regulated Learning)

Mean Std. Deviation


Before After Before After
Declarative
2.15 3.18 0.37 0.30
Knowledge
Procedural
2.06 3.28 0.33 0.40
Knowledge
Conditional
2.30 3.28 0.23 0.43
Knowledge
Planning 2.16 3.17 0.18 0.41
Comprehension
2.14 3.30 0.30 0.30
Monitoring
Info
Management 2.08 3.21 0.32 0.37
System
Debugging
2.20 3.36 0.47 0.32
Strategy
Evaluation 2.07 3.15 0.25 0.31
Table #. Descriptive Statistics for levels of SRL before the Intervention

Mean Std. Deviation


Before
Declarative
2.15 0.37
Knowledge
Procedural
2.06 0.33
Knowledge
Conditional
2.30 0.23
Knowledge
Planning 2.16 0.18
Comprehension
2.14 0.30
Monitoring
Info
Management 2.08 0.32
System
Debugging
2.20 0.47
Strategy
Evaluation 2.07 0.25

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for levels of SRL after the Intervention

Mean Std. Deviation


After
Declarative
3.18 0.30
Knowledge
Procedural
3.28 0.40
Knowledge
Conditional
3.28 0.43
Knowledge
Planning 3.17 0.41
Comprehension
3.30 0.30
Monitoring
Info
Management 3.21 0.37
System
Debugging
3.36 0.32
Strategy
Evaluation 3.15 0.31
Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-


tailed)
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence
Deviation Mean Interval of the
Difference

Lower Upper

SRLBEF -
Pair 1 -1.096 .085 .030 -1.167 -1.025 -36.619 7 .000
SRLAFT

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

SRL Level
(Before) -
Pair 1 -1.096 0.085 .030 -1.167 -1.167 -36.619 7 .000
SRL Level
(After)

will you interpret this paired sample t-test that will be put on a research paper, act like a statistician :
mean before the srl is 2.15 (sd= 0.080), mean before the srl is 3.24 (sd=.074) and paired differences
(mean = -1.096, std. dev =0.085, std. error dev = .030, 95% 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
(low er= -1.167, higher = -1.167) , t= -36.619, df = 7 , sig (2-tailed) = .000
Table #. Paired Samples Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation


SRL Level
2.15 .080
(Before)
Pair 1
SRL Level
3.24 .074
(After)
\

Mean Std. Deviation


SRL Level
2.15 .080
(Before)
Pair 1
SRL Level
3.24 .074
(After)
Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval of


Deviation Mean the Difference

Lower Upper

Pair 1 dk - decl 1.02500 .48520 .15343 .67791 1.37209 6.680 9 .000

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

Declarative
Knowledge
(Before) -
Pair 1 1.02500 .48520 .15343 .67791 1.37209 6.680 9 .000
Declarative
Knowledge
(After)

Paired Samples Test


Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Deviation Mean of the Difference

Lower Upper

proce -
Pair 1 1.20000 .34960 .11055 .94991 1.45009 10.854 9 .000
procec

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

Procedural
Knowledge
(Before) -
Pair 1 1.20000 .34960 .11055 .94991 1.45009 10.854 9 .000
Procedural
Knowledge
(After)

Paired Samples Test


Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence
Deviation Mean Interval of the
Difference

Lower Upper

condi -
Pair 1 .98400 .44630 .14113 .66474 1.30326 6.972 9 .000
condic

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

Conditiona
l
Knowledge
(Before) -
Pair 1 .98400 .44630 .14113 .66474 1.30326 6.972 9 .000
Conditiona
l
Knowledge
(After)
Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-


tailed)
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Deviation Mean of the Difference

Lower Upper

plann -
Pair 1 1.01429 .45897 .14514 .68596 1.34262 6.988 9 .000
planning

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

Planning
(Before) -
Pair 1 1.01429 .45897 .14514 .68596 1.34262 6.988 9 .000
Planning
(After)
Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-


tailed)
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Deviation Mean of the Difference

Lower Upper

compre -
Pair 1 1.15714 .46875 .14823 .82182 1.49247 7.806 9 .000
comprehe

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

Planning
(Before) -
Pair 1 1.15714 .46875 .14823 .82182 1.49247 7.806 9 .000
Planning
(After)

Paired Samples Test


Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Deviation Mean of the Difference

Lower Upper

ims -
Pair 1 1.13000 .51001 .16128 .76516 1.49484 7.006 9 .000
infom

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

IMS
Pair 1 (Before) - 1.13000 .51001 .16128 .76516 1.49484 7.006 9 .000
IMS (After)
Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-


tailed)
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Deviation Mean of the Difference

Lower Upper

debb -
Pair 1 1.16000 .63105 .19956 .70858 1.61142 5.813 9 .000
debstrat

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

Debugging
Strategies
(Before) -
Pair 1 1.16000 .63105 .19956 .70858 1.61142 5.813 9 .000
Debugging
Strategies
(After)

Paired Samples Test


Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence
Deviation Mean Interval of the
Difference

Lower Upper

eval - 1.0833
Pair 1 .43921 .13889 .76914 1.39752 7.800 9 .000
evaluat 3

Table #. Descriptive Statistics for Paired-Sample t-test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence
Sig. (2-
Interval of the t df
Std. Std. Error Difference tailed)
Mean
Deviation Mean
Lower Upper

Evaluation
(Before) -
Pair 1 1.08333 .43921 .13889 .76914 1.39752 7.800 9 .000
Evaluation
(After)

You might also like