Unit 2
Unit 2
2.0 INTRODUCTION
All undertaken financial tasks become easy when they are performed with a defined set of
rules or parameters. This framework of rules guides us to perform our activities,
effectively. Now, if these set of rules are widely acceptable, they turn to be standards and
thus becomes valuable to us. To understand this lets us take the example of you, driving
a vehicle on the road. You are supposed to follow ‘the driving rule’ by keeping your
vehicle on the left side of the road. You see all other travellers also follow this rule, while
driving. Let us think what would happen if these vehicle drivers don’t follow this rule;
obviously, this would lead to creation of a chaotic situation on the road. Understandably,
a similar thought process has been the backbone to the discipline of accounting where the
accounting principles which have been evolving over the past several hundred years, have
led to the creation of many rules and conventions which have enabled the accounting
system to become more acceptable, meaningful and trustworthy. Thus it becomes
important for us before making and understanding the accounting reports, to understand
the rationale behind the creation of these reports. The said rationale arises from the
widely familiar and accepted rules and conventions, which require to be familiarised,
first. We all know that the global environments are changing and the accounting
discipline also requires to match the growing business needs. Companies stay in pursuit
to expand their operations internationally. There arises a challenge that different nations
follow different accounting standards and there is a lack of harmony among them. This
underlines the need of standardization and thus this need was met with the framing of a
global set of standards referred as ‘International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)’.
These internationally proclaimed standards speak one global business accounting
language not only to remove language barriers but facilitate global trade. It makes the
accounting terms and reports easily understandable and comparable across international
boundaries. So despite the linguistic barriers the rule standardization helps us overcome
this problem through global accounting standardized framework of IFRS.
20
Accounting
Accounting
Conceptsand
andits
2.1 OBJECTIVES Standards
Functions
Underline the logic for the necessity and creation for a conceptually sound
accounting structure;
Understand the role of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP);
Appreciate the need and importance for the demand of uniformity in international
accounting practices and;
Recognise the importance of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Accounting is a very specified and objectivity laid subject and it works under a defined
set of guidelines, policies, rules, agreements, covenants and conventions. They all
formulate the Accounting’s conceptual framework. This framework is conceptual but
remains flexible to meet to the new challenges arising from the accounting practices
across the world. It serves to be the essence as a knowledge base, with logically and
precisely defined acceptable rules, practices and procedures contribute towards the
creation of a framework for the professionals where they can contribute with their
experiential learning and knowledge in this discipline. This set of standardized rules,
procedures and guiding principles become a guiding light to resolve any ambiguities or
clarifications, which may arise. Thus, it would not be wrong to say that this theoretical
framework would facilitate the accounting profession become globally acceptable.
Hendrickson (1977) holistically, defines it “as logical reasoning in form of a set of broad
principles that (i) provide a general frame of reference by which accounting practice can
be evaluated, and (ii) guide the development of new practices and procedures.” So this
theory mitigates the ambiguities and thus makes it understandable and acceptable. As it is
evolutionary in nature, it has to be governed with a basic set of core principles which
would not only be a standard reference point for appraising, developing and reviewing
but continually evaluate them too.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has also worked on the
varied aspects pertaining to the financial accounting theory and generally accepted
accounting principles, and they say, that the “Financial statements are the product of
process in which a big data pertaining to different perspectives of business actions are
accumulated, analysed, and reported.” These said defined set of activities and processes
are followed with the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The latter,
envisages unanimity of various accounting professionals and firms to define the set of
‘recordable activities’ and they being factored and measured. It also frameworks the
extent of disclosure (or recording) of the accounting information.
GAAP though is principle in nature but it involves a defined and flexible framework of
conventions, rules and procedures which are important to identify the standard or
acceptable account practices.
Since the essence behind these principles is standardization so various terms have been
precisely defined for the ease of understanding. “Principle’ is applied as a “general law or
rule adopted or professed as a guide to action, a settled ground or basis of conduct or
practice”. You will note that this definition describes a “principle as a general law or rule
that is to be used as a guide to action”. This implies that accounting principles do not
prescribe exactly how each detailed event occurring in business should be recorded.
Consequently, there are several matters in accounting practice that may differ from one
company to another.
21
Accounting System “Accounting principles are a work of human creation and are accepted for their
usefulness. The general acceptance of an accounting principle (or for that matter, any
principle) usually depends on how well it meets the three criteria of relevance,
objectivity, and feasibility. A principle is relevant to the extent that it results in
meaningful or useful information to those who need to know about a certain business. A
principle is objective to the extent that the information is not influenced by the personal
bias or judgement of those who furnished it. Objectivity connotes reliability or
trustworthiness which also means that the correctness of the information reported can be
verified. A principle is feasible to the extent that it can be implemented without undue
complexity or cost.”
You would have understood from the earlier unit 1 that the accounting is the business
language. With widespread acceptability, it showcases various forms as the languages
shows dialects. It means that the accounting also has many terminologies which becomes
a challenge for its global recognition and acceptance. Different combinations of words,
phrases and terms have been used to convey a same or similar meaning, thereby leading
to confusion with the reader. The various terms used for describing the basic ideas, each
term carries its own meaning, the ambiguous use by several accounting professionals
have resulted in the creation of confusion arising from generalization resulting in loose
and overlapping meanings at the readers’ end. Besides, the concept by an author is
proposed as a convention by the other which makes the learner unconvinced and may lose
interest in the subject.
So here would emphasize to put the concepts straight to get out of the terminology puzzle
by acknowledging the generally accepted ideas as ‘concepts’. Going further, the other
such ideas not categorised as concepts are ‘conventions’.
2.3.1 Concepts to be observed at the Recording Stage
i) Business Entity Concept
The Accounting subject distinct business from the owner as it treats them as two separate
entities. So the accounting for the business is from the business viewpoint rather than
from the owner’s perspective. The concept treats a business firm of an enterprising nature
distincting the firm’s owner(s) from the business. So accounting activities of both require
to be recorded separately. While capturing a transaction in the book of records the
accountant must see how the transaction is affecting the business. Say if the business
owner (a separate business entity, already discussed) takes cash out of the business for
meeting his personal expenditure, the entry must be captured for the cash reduction in
business. On the other hand, if the owner brings his cash in to the business he becomes
the creditor to the business and the firm has to capture this cash transaction as the firm’s
liability to pay back to the owner.
This concept of business entity can further be understood with a limited company as in
this case the business/company or firm is a separate legal entity (or personality) as like
any individual despite being involved in many commercial and industrial activities.
Partnership firms are hard to separate the individual nature because of separate persons.
This distinctiveness gets even harder in case of sole proprietorship firm. So you would
have understood that the accounting comes across such challenges to be resolved from
time to time using the set of rules and conventions. We also have understood that
accounting still requires separating business from the owner. It is pertinent mentioning
here that the Law doesn’t accept this distinction between the company and the owner(s)
as distinct activities. So the accountant requires to stay aware while dealing in a legal
matter.
A creditor to the company requires timely information about the firm’s assets as well as
22 the owner(s) personal assets for validating the creditworthiness. The management
appoints employees who carry the responsibilities on them for managing the funds Accounting
Accounting
Conceptsand
andits
derived from firm owner(s), financial institutions etc. Their efficiencies are reflected in Standards
Functions
various periodic and annual reports and their timely compliance”
So the money (with its denominated value) happens to be the “practical common
denominator” serving a measure of profitability of the business by capturing the monetary
value of the assets and equities. This concept comes with certain limitations also as it
cannot capture the ‘qualitative aspect’ of the said assets which stand important to the
business. Like the efforts done by a manager and his related sacrifices on family and the
health fronts, cannot be captured in the accounting records. On the same lines, any
interpersonal differences or conflicts between two head of the departments may bring in
adverse results on the firm’s performance making the employees become demotivated
23
Accounting System and the customer becoming dissatisfied with the product quality. This may lead to the
erosion of the market share to the favour of the competitor. Similarly, due to changes in
the business environment and a new product developed by the R&D team and its
subsequent customer acceptance are of much significance to the business but the Money
measurement concept has its limitations in capturing the above cited examples.
By now, we have understood that Accounting faces its own set of limitations in recording
and showcasing the business activities, of which many of them have underlined
contributions for the company’s projected profitability.
The other limitation of the Money Measurement concept is the ‘time value’. It treats the
present value of rupee money today equal to its value which was say, ten years back or
ten years in the future. That is, the concept assumes the value of the money staying
‘constant’ over the time period as it only records the transaction date. The alterations in
‘purchasing power of money’ arising out of international business environments, forex
rate fluctuations and national reserves, inflation, depreciation etc. are not captured. So
you can recall that rupees’ value when you were young and its value now, have changed
big. Let it be the fuel expenses, rentals or even milk price all have gone up substantially.
The same stands true for the accountants also as they believe that rupee’s purchasing
power modifies, but the issue remains that this acceptance in the changing money values
is not captured in the accounting books. Thus posing to be a major current accounting
hindrance, it aims to resolve this measurement problem or issue to encompass the
qualitative aspect besides identifying and reporting relevant information. It is proposed
that a separate report be provided on the effect of pricing variations on reported financial
position of the firm.”
“The term objectivity refers to being free from bias or free from subjectivity. Accounting
measurements are to be unbiased and verifiable independently.” Because of this reason all
accounting transactions requires to be evidenced and be duly endorsed with verifiable
supporting documents like bills, invoices, receipts, cash memos, etc. These substantiate
the accounting transaction be verified later by the auditors. As for the items like
depreciation and the provision for doubtful debts where no documentary evidence is
available, the policy statements made by management are treated as the necessary
evidence.
One of the foundational feature of this subject, it emphasizes on the concept that every
business transaction carries a ‘two-fold effect’ as it is traditionally and correctly phrased
that “every receiver is also a giver and every giver is also a receiver”. Let’s recall when
you go for shopping in a mall and you purchase a pair of denim for Rs 1,000. This
involves two transactions; one you pay Rs.1000 and the second you carry the denims.
24 This should explain to you the “two fold effect” i.e., (i) one asset (in form of denims)
increases while (ii) decrease in the cash in hand occurs. On the same lines, if you would Accounting
Accounting
Conceptsand
andits
have chosen to buy these denims on credit, the assets with you would increase (stock of Standards
Functions
goods) while your liability towards creditors would increase too. So with this, we can
conclude that all business transactions comprises of two parts: (i) the receiving aspect,
and (ii) the giving aspect. To understand this from the first example further, the receiving
aspect is pair of denim while the giving aspect is cash. In the second example the
receiving aspect is goods (denims) and the giving aspect is the creditor. So, we conclude
with this the dual nature of transactions where both the transactions are to be captured in
the account books and this remains as one of the fundamental principle of “double entry
book-keeping” or “the “Double Entry System of Book-keeping” which we would be
deliberating on subsequently. It’s time to move forward to recognize another accounting
effect of this dual aspect concept, we are studying. The owner brings in the required funds
(capital) to start a business. He may generate more funds as required from time to time
from external agencies (creditors). Here, the dual aspect concept says that ‘all receipts
create corresponding obligations for their repayment’. Or, to understand in a better way,
any business contribution, whether in cash or kind, not only increases its resources
(assets), but also its obligations (liabilities/equities) correspondingly. Thus, at any given
point of time, the total assets and the total liabilities must be equal. This equality is called
‘balance sheet equation’ or ‘accounting equation’.
It is stated as under: Liabilities (Equities) = Assets or Capital + Outside Liabilities =
Assets
The term ‘assets’ denotes the resources (property) owned by the business while the term
‘equities’ denotes the claims of various parties against the business assets. Equities are of
two types: (1) owners’ equity, and (ii) outsiders’ equity. Owners’ equity called capital is
the claim of the owners against the assets of the business. Outsiders’ equity called
liabilities is the claim of outside parties like creditors, bank, etc. against the assets of the
business.
Thus, all assets of the business are claimed either by the owners or by the outsiders.
Hence, the total assets of a business will always be equal to its liabilities. When various
business transactions take place, they affect the assets and liabilities in such a way that
this equality is always maintained. We shall understand this with couple of exemplary
transactions to see to this equality maintenance:
1. Mr. XY initiated his business with INR 1,00,000 cash, which formed the asset to the
business. Business entity concept says that the business and the owner are two separate
entities thus Mr. XY contribution of one lakh should be treated as the business liability.
So Capital = Assets
Rs. 1,00,000 = Rs. 1,00,000 (cash)
2. He purchased goods on credit from AB for Rs. 10,000. This increases an asset (stock of
goods) on the one hand and a liability (creditors) on the other. Now the equation will be
Capital + Liabilities = Assets
Rs. 1,00,000 + Rs. 10,000 = Rs. 10,000 + Rs. 1,00,000
Capital + Creditors Stock + Cash
3. He purchased furniture worth Rs. 15,000 and paid cash. This increases one asset
(furniture) and decreases another asset (cash). Now the equation will be:
Capital + Liabilities = Assets
Rs. 1,00,000 + Rs. 10,000 = Rs. 15,000 + Rs. 10,000 + Rs. 85,000
Capital + Creditors Furniture + Stock + Cash
This equation can be presented in the form of a Balance Sheet (a statement of assets and
liabilities) as follows:
XY ‘s Balance Sheet
Capital and Liabilities Rs. Assets Rs.
Capital 1,00,000 Furniture 15,000
(Mr. AB) Creditor 10,000 Stock of Goods 10,000
Cash 85,000
1,15,000 1,15,000
Note that the net sum on both sides of the Balance Sheet remains equal irrespective of the
number of transactions and the items transacted. Also, note that the cash head in the
25
Accounting System assets gets impacted for the payments made. All this underlines the dual effect on the
assets and liabilities of the business.
v) Cost Concept
Business operations require owing various resources like land, buildings, infrastructure,
machinery, property rights and in accounting terms are called as ‘assets’. It is worth the
price paid for, or cost incurred to acquire it.” This means that as asset purchase
transactions are captured at their original purchase price and this cost is the basis for all
subsequent accounting for the assets. The assets shown on the financial statements do not
necessarily indicate their present market worth (or market values). This is contrary to
what is often believed by an uninformed person reading the statement or report. The term
‘book value’ is used for the amount shown in the accounting records.
A pertinent example is cash, itself. It has also been observed that longer an asset is kept in
a firm, less would be the probability of the accounting value matching the market value of
the asset retained. This remains a problem area for an accounting professional.
The cost concept doesn’t factor the future anticipated cost of a firm’s asset. Any asset is
assumed to have long & limited life. The cost of an asset reduces over a time period and
the account professionals terms this as ‘depreciation process’ which we would be
understanding in coming units. Yes, by that time, we would understand depreciation as
process by virtue of which an asset’s cost gets periodically reduced (or written off) by
factoring it as expense over some accounting period. This means that depreciation as
expenses eats into the firm’s profits. While factoring depreciation, the accountant doesn’t
brings into the account the current market value of the depreciating asset, rather there
exists no correlation in depreciation vis a viz asset’s current market value. It is required to
be clarified here that the logic behind depreciation is to spread and allocate the asset’s
cost for its useful life to the firm and certainly not to appropriate it with its current market
value.
This may exclaim you on the reasons why the assets get marked as ‘costs’, in the
accounting records and there exists a wide difference between their market prices and
book recorded prices. The main argument is that the cost concept meets all the three basic
criteria of relevance, objectivity and feasibility.
26 .........................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................... Accounting
Accounting
Conceptsand
andits
Standards
Functions
.........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
The same process be followed pertaining to the expense made by the company.it has been
practically observed that the cash payments towards the expenses made are done either
before or after their due date. So in accounting terms the due amounts which are required
to be paid are categorised as expenses. It also means that the advance payments (i.e., it
does not belong to the accounting period in question) should not be accounted for as
‘expense’, thereby treating the entity receiving such advance payments as ‘debtor’ by the
time his due date of payment arrives. Where an expense has been incurred during the
accounting period, but no payment has been made, the expense must be recorded and the
person to whom the payment should have been made is shown as a creditor.
.......................................................................................................................................... 27
Accounting System
2.3.2 Concepts to be observed at the Reporting Stage
This concept serves to enable the assumption that the business remains perpetual and
shall be a going entity in the future or at least in foreseeable future this concept becomes
the foundation for many valuations and allocations in the firm’s accounting task. In case
of depreciation (or amortisation), the process banks on the said concept. It also serves the
investor to stay invested or invest in fresh in a company. It is also true that based on this
accounting concept the accounting process remain transparent for capturing the records
and thereafter reporting the investments, management’s efficiency and reporting the
firm’s position. Also, this concept doesn’t factors the higher current market values or the
liquidation values which stand important in the other concepts studied by now. This
assumption provides a basis for the application of cost in accounting for assets.
Though the accountant stands with this concept theoretically, he has to comprehend that
the firm’s business, partially or wholly may cease to exist or operate, or be sold or exited
(say within a year or two), then the resources could be reported at their current values (or
liquidation values).
We understand that the various financial statements whether been made monthly,
quarterly, half-yearly or annually serve a basic function of communicating
trustworthy financial information to all the stakeholders in a standard format.
These statements are the sole basis to assess the performance and financial 29
Accounting System position of the firm. These stakeholders can be investors, lenders, suppliers and
internal as well as external customers. So it becomes the responsibility of the
accountant to adhere to the standard norms while publishing such financial
statements as they bring much needed credibility and add to the goodwill of the
firm. Such statements should be elaborative and having foot-notes to disclose all
relevant information of a material nature which relate to the profit and loss and
the financial position of the business. It is therefore, necessary that the disclosure
should be full, fair and adequate.
In an effort of factoring earnings and the cost of those earnings for a specified
accounting period, requires encompassing all the revenues and costs pertaining of
that accounting period requires to be factored irrespective of whether or not they
have been received in cash, or paid in cash. Withstanding all these issues in
allocations and adjustments, the relevance of these short-term reports (i.e., yearly
reports) owe a great deal of importance for business owners, management,
creditors, and stakeholders and they look forward to the accountant for the timely
publication of such reports.
Some other concepts, e.g., the Matching concept, the Realisation concept and the
Dual Aspect concept are discussed in units 4 and 5, and as such, they have not
been taken up here.
After going through the above accounting concepts, you would have concluded
that all the concepts stand important on their own, but they may demonstrate
conflict when they interact. So the knowledge of the accountant comes handy in
such scenarios. For example, in case of business properties’ valuation
perspective, let a company buy a land parcel in 2000 amounting to INR 6,00,000
and it began the construction in the next year i.e 2001 to commence the business
activities, the very next year. The company showcased stellar results meeting to
the stakeholders’ expectations. Now, the Balance Sheet (a statement of assets and
liabilities) for the year 2010 is being prepared and ‘Land’ is required to be
valued. The estimated current market price of this land is Rs. 60, 00,000.
Now, as an accounting professional, would you agree to the proposition of the land be
recorded at INR 60 lakh? The accounting principle makes us accounted in the Balance
sheet at the purchase price only. To begin with, money measurement concept inhibits us
from recognising the price appreciation because of market and inflationary reasons. Then
comes the realisation concept which stops us for unrealised profits being factored in the
book of accounts by the time the said asset (land, here) is not sold for money. Adding to
that, the continuity, or going concern concept, doesn’t recognises the market value of
land thus is not factored in balance sheet as the land remains as the asset and an integral
30
input to pursue business operations. Assuming the contrarian view, if the land be depicted
in balance sheet at the estimated current market value may attract the business owner to Accounting
Accounting
Conceptsand
andits
abandon/ stop the business by selling land and retire himself. Next, the principle of Standards
Functions
objectivity makes the argument more challenging. As the price of the said land at the
time of acquisition in 2001 is a verifiable document with proofs arising from the sale deed
and other relevant supportive documentary evidences. But in case of the 2010 land
estimation value may be suspected as various valuations would be based on varied
calculations involving time frames, usage, market demand, availability and other
commercial aspects. An accredited valuer may be hired for his valuation methodology be
accepted as verifiable evidence of land’s prevailing market price. Further, the land
requires to be free from all encumbrances, or the cost of already constructed premise in
that land, its quality of construction and compliance to the legal bylaws. Here, the
conservatism concept inhibits accepting the said land market estimation value on
accuracy concerns.
v) Concept of Conservatism
This concept is also called as the concept of prudence, and is known for its statement
“anticipate no profit, provide for all possible losses”. It makes the accountant raise his
guard with abundant caution. This makes him face an interesting proposition of having an
option of capturing values of for assets and revenues on the lesser value while higher
valuations towards liabilities and expenses. The concept states to recognise revenues or
gains only when realized as cash or assets (usually legally enforceable debts). This is
ultimate cash realisation of which can be assessed with reasonable certainty. The concept
says to “factor in for all known liabilities, expenses, and losses whether the amount of
these is known with certainty, or is at best an estimate in the light of the information
available. Probable losses in respect of all contingencies should also be provided for.”
A contingency is defined as “a condition, or a situation, the ultimate outcome of
whichgain or losscannot be determined accurately at present.” It would be ascertained
only post happening of the event. It may be understood that the said event may not even
happened. Say, a client may file a suit in the court of law against the firm and we don’t
know the verdict. So from the accounting point of view, it becomes pertinent to factor or
provision the expected loss in the company’s financial statements. Thus, as a solicitation
of the said concept “net assets and incomes are more likely to be understated than
overstated”. This makes us advocate the practice of valuing inventory (stock of goods left
unsold) at cost or market price, whichever is lower valued. You would observe that this is
an extension of what the cost concept said initially. Though many professionals have a
contrarian view about this concept as it hinders true profit valuation and thereby
distortedly presenting the facts in the firm’s financial statements. So it is correct to state
that a rational use of conservatism is advocated as over-conservatism leads to falsification
of the financial data.
The appreciable part of the accounting subject and its concepts is the ability of drawing
valid conclusions by utilizing the various reports pertaining to the accounting
information. It facilitates data comparison of data at specific intervals with even of
previous periods. This supports citing of differences and calls for the introspection of the
management for a timely corrective action. “Comparing like with the like” leads to
following of ongoing methods or procedures as any deviation in this regard may affect
the reported financial position of the firm. Also, this discussed inconsistency leads to the
scope of data manipulation and still to corrupt practices.
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................…..............
2.4.1 Need for Accounting Standards: we all have understood by now that various
stakeholders require the published financial statements for taking the right investment
decisions in the firm. The Indian Companies Act specifies the various types of
information the companies require to disclose, report and publish via their financial
statements. The firm’s accountant or accounts professional owes this responsibility
towards timely and authentic financial information be presented. Since this publication is
in a standard and predefined format, discretion may not be allowed to tamper with the
format, methods and followed procedures. This results in the company’s goodwill
creation and reputation as a transparent, disciplined and consistent in authentic data
reporting. For example, one firm may have reported loss in its annual financial statements
but then also declares a dividend arising out of manipulation of numbers. The firm may
be able to retain its shareholders, lenders, suppliers and investors in short duration and
prevent share capital erosion but in the longer run this decision may prove devastating to
them.
We have understood by now, the importance of these financial reports to the investors,
shareholders and other beneficiaries. We also have agreed to the need of standardized
approach for reporting the financial statements for international coherence. Such financial
reports reveal the management’s competencies in allocating the scares resources in an
effective and efficient way. This calls for the availability and acceptance of widely
acceptable and appropriate standards for the unified benefit of the investor as well as the
nation. We have discussed the financial reporting requires data presentation in a
‘comparative way’ and be followed extensively by the industries. The stakeholder desires
transparency while reporting of financial statements and would certainly wouldn’t expect
any change in accounting methods. He banks on the firm’s management competencies
resulting in better allocation of resources yielding rich dividends. A prerogative to firms
let choose their own reporting stands would be chaotic both for the company but the
national economy too. It may lead to unplanned resource utilization leading to shortages.
So an approach of reporting fictitious profits by the less efficient companies to shift the
resources towards them in the shorter duration, which would result in its scarcity with the
more efficient companies thereby, making a coupling impact on both.
Since these standards are in recommendatory format in the proposal structure they are
suggested to be implemented by the stock exchange listed firms, corporate bodies,
institutions and other commercial bodies.
It is recommended to you that you study these standards and deliberate it to find out the
qualitative aspect of these accounting standards. More you would gain insights on the
structured rules, policies and procedures of accounting and the need for their
standardization. You may come cross hurdles in understanding few terminologies or
logical aspects of these standards but their understanding to you would open up new
thinking directions in your minds. The more you study the next units, the more you will
increase your inquisitiveness to study more about these accounting standards and the need
of the same in our country.
The implementation of these accounting standards in our country has been a challenge
since they were established without designing the theoretical framework. In the absence
of the latter it has been questioned on these accounting standards and principles proposed
34 to be implemented for lack direction and coherence. Other developed nations like UK and
USA also faced similar situation but they were swift to resolve such issues. The US Accounting
Accounting
Conceptsand
andits
develop a conceptual framework project through FASB and structurally intended to Standards
Functions
define objectives of financial reporting. This led to suggesting of accounting concepts and
standards commonly known as “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Any
attempt to develop a conceptual framework regarding the objectives of reporting will
have to take into consideration the answers to the following questions:
i) Who are the users of financial reports?
ii) What decisions do these user groups have to take?
iii) What information can be provided that would assist them to take such decisions?
The objectives, as you have already noted, depend upon the economic, social, legal and
political environment of the country.
Section 133 of Companies Act, 2013 requires the companies to comply with the
prevailing accounting standards. As on 1st April, 2021 there are 32 accounting standards
specified by ICAI, AS from 1-29 are mandatory and AS 30, 31 and 32 are non mandatory
and have been withdrawn.
We all understand that the Business environment is evolves rapidly and its constituents of
political, economic and financial environments have individual as well as coupling effect
on the business. Thus the business operations require to keep abreast with the rapid
changes and their regular monitoring and evaluation for the continued relevance of
GAAP. So it means that the GAAP are also not standards but evolving standards being
developed with the changing business environments. So the business firms require to
continuously upgrading themselves with modifications in GAAP for developing and
reporting, generally acceptable financial statements with the stakeholders.
The US identified the need for setting the standards in 1933 when it formed the
“Securities Exchange Commission (SEC)”, a government agency. Its objective was to
regulate and controls the issuance of, and dealings in securities of the companies.
Thereafter, in 1957, a research-based entity, the Accounting Principles Boards (APB) got
established for framing fundamental accounting postulates. And in 1973, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was established with the responsibility of issuance
of statements and articulation of GAAP.it is important to mention here that the role of
SEC towards FASB pronouncements has given considerable credibility to its accounting
policy statement. The FASB has been issuing statements of concepts and financial
accounting standards regularly.
Standards at International Level: the globalization of the world trade across the
geographical borders and to capture new markets and resources, a rapid expansion in
business activities by thee global companies required accounting standardisation at the
international levels. An International Congress of Accountants was organised in 1972 at
Sydney, Australia for deliberating on bringing uniformity in the international accounting
practices, this resulted in the formation of ‘International Accounting Standards
Committee (IASC)’ and was provided with the responsibility of formulating international
standards. IASC’s member nations committed for conformance towards the IASC
standards. They also agreed to provide a critical review on these accounting standards.
This fast convergence for the international standards saw formation of another such
professional body named ‘International Federation of Accountants’ (IFAC) in 1978.
In today’s globalized environment, business does not operate in just one country rather
they operate around the world. However, it must be emphasized that around the globe,
different countries follow different accounting standards. This leads to a need for a global
set of standards commonly referred to as ‘International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS)’. IFRS are designed to serve as a common global language of business affairs so
that accounts of various companies are understandable and comparable across
international boundaries. National accounting standards prevailing in different countries
are being replaced by these International Financial Reporting Standards.
37
Accounting System They are a set of standards formulated by International Accounting Standard Board
(IASB) defining the guidelines for the treatment to a financial transaction and reporting of
event in the accounting statements. They are a guiding set of principles and procedures
used to define the foundational parameters for various financial accounting policies and
practices.
The Finance profession is one of the fastest growing in the financial world. The
General Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) are gaining momentum across many countries. Since
they account for much needed transparency of financial reporting across the
world. IFRS carried the responsibility of specifying on the ways various
businesses to follow should be maintaining and reporting their business accounts.
Created to establish a common accounting language, the goal of the international
financial reporting standards is to make financial statements coherent and
consistent across different industries and countries.
IFRS aims to serve as an enabler in the much needed task of comparing the
financial statements across the nations. This is a practically tedious task, as most
countries follow their individually followed set of standards. Say, the US, follows
US GAAP and India, has its version of Indian GAAP. So, it remains a challenge
to bring all such economically empowered nations on the same board.
Listed Companies with more than 250 crores of net worth – 1stApril, 2017
The need for IFRS convergence in India is necessary due to the following
reasons:
It also suffers from many challenges. Let us discuss these challenges one by one
1. Training & Awareness – Many do not know the IFRS standards & lack of
knowledge & awareness makes it a difficult task of implementation. Finance
professionals will have to be adequately trained and then the standards can be
implemented consistently and uniformly in right spirit.
2. Changes in Indian regulation – Current regulations governing the financial
regulation would need a complete overhaul to implement the IFRS standards. The
Companies Act 1956, SEBI act 1992, IT Act 1962 etc. will have to be amended
to bring them in line with IFRS regulations. These legal hurdles are a major
constraint in the path of IFRS convergence.
3. Fair Value system of measurement – The IFRS considers the fair value
system of asset measurement and the Indian GAAP recognizes historical system.
This divergence of system would create volatility and subjectivity in financial
statements. This would lead to different results for performance & earnings of the
Company.
4. IT systems – Financial accounting software and tools used for reporting
would have to be completely changed resulting in substantial investment in IT
infrastructure for Indian Companies. Indian companies are habitually reluctant
when any proposal involves cost, time & effort.
39
Accounting System 5. Small & Medium businesses – The SME sector in India is comparatively
larger than other Countries. The cost of convergence far outweighs the
advantages of convergence for these small businesses. The dearth of resource and
skills in financial knowledge adds up to the problem of implementation in this
sector. In addition, SME’s cannot be ignored, considering the role they play in
the Indian economy.
2.8 SUMMARY
Accounting is a fast emerging discipline and its development at the international
level also, has generated a lot of interest towards it. This subject has been
instrumental in providing a theoretical framework comprising of principles, rules,
concepts and guidelines from time to time. These guiding rules or principles
require to be widely practiced for bringing the interest from various account
professionals contribute towards its development hence the name, Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Various initiatives for a coherent
approach across the countries have been endeavoured upon, underlining the need
for the accounting subject to support the international businesses.
These accounting principles are constituted with broad guidelines, wide variety of
methods and practices, making it easy for wider application and adoption.
However, the challenge remains in wide and uniform acceptability amongst the
companies. Since the accounting professionals and investors require comparing
the various financial reports of different companies, and each following their own
set of rules makes the comparison become a tedious task. There is always a risk
of under-reporting and concealing of facts and manipulated earnings, when there
is no standardization in recording and reporting of these accounting statements.
This lames the entire endeavour as the usefulness of the statements to the users.
Globally, the standardization of the accounting practices is well recognised with
many acclaimed institutions and professional entities are engaged in
standardising the accounting practices as a unified movement focussed to bring
international consensus. This requires a fact check of presently practiced ways by
the accountants and then seeks in the refinement of those worked practices by
motivating them to follow the standards (involving ironing their doubts or
resistance, if any) thereby building a sound theory of accounting. Indian context
has demonstrated significant progress in this direction with the adoption of
twenty eight standards for accounting practice. In today’s globalized
environment, business does not operate in just one country rather they operate
40 around the world. However, it must be emphasized that around the globe,
different countries follow different accounting standards. This leads to a need for Accounting
Accounting
Conceptsand
andits
a global set of standards commonly referred to as ‘International Financial Standards
Functions
Reporting Standards (IFRS)’. IFRS are designed to serve as a common global
language of business affairs so that accounts of various companies are
understandable and comparable across international boundaries. Merits of IFRS
are as follows: i) Completeness, ii) Understandability, iii) Reliability, iv)
Timeliness, v) Neutrality, vi) Verifiability, vii) Consistency, viii) Comparability
and ix) Transparency. The challenges of IFRS are as follows: 1. Training &
Awareness, 2. Changes in Indian regulation 3. Fair Value system of
Measurement 4. IT System 5. Small & Medium businesses
Accrual concept says that an accountant should recognise incomes and expenses when
they have actually accrued, irrespective of whether cash is received or paid.
Consistency concept envisages that accounting information should be prepared on a
consistent basis from period to period, and within periods there should be consistent
treatment of similar items.
Conservatism concept forbids the inclusion of unrealised gains but advocates provision
for possible losses.
Cost Concept states that an asset is to be recorded in books of accounts at a price for, or
at a cost incurred to acquire it.
Entity concept separates the business from owner(s), from the standpoint of accounting.
Going concern concept refers to the expectation that the organisation will have an
indefinite life. This assumption has an important bearing on how the assets are to be
valued.
Materiality concept admonishes that events of relatively small importance need not be
given a detailed or theoretically correct treatment. They may be ignored for recording
purpose.
Money measurement concept states that all transactions are to be recorded only in
monetary terms and record only those transactions, which can be measured in money
terms. It ignores intangibles like employee loyalty and customer satisfaction, as they
cannot be expressed in money terms. It also assumes records on the basis of a stable
monetary unit.
Objectivity principle requires that only the information based on definite and verifiable
facts are to be recorded.
Periodicity concept divides the life of a business into smaller time periods which are
generally one year, and the accountant is supposed to prepare necessary financial
statements for each time period.
41
Accounting System IFRS are designed to serve as a common global language of business affairs so that
accounts of various companies are understandable and comparable across international
boundaries.
3. Yes, because as per the entity concept the business and the proprietor
are two separate entities. If the proprietor contributes some amount
towards capital, it means that the business has a liability to return it
to the proprietor.
4. No, the given concept doesn’t factors or allows recording such events
as this event’s business effect cannot be objectively evaluated.
6. As per the cost concept, the company should show the value of
machinery in books of accounts at Rs. 40,000 the price, which is
being actually paid.
9. No. Since the order is not actually obtained, the probable sales
revenue could not be recognized as per the conservatism concept.
10. Though the table has a long-term life and as such can be shown as an
asset, yet the materiality concept requires it to be treated as an expense.
3. Explain whether you came across any conflicts in any of the accounting concepts?
Cite references to validate your stand?
10. What do you mean by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)? Explain the
benefits and challenges of IFRS.
43