Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
9 views1 page

In .NET Core, Asynchronous Operatio

The document outlines the implementation of asynchronous operations in .NET Core using the `async` and `await` keywords. It emphasizes the importance of returning `Task` or `Task<T>` in methods, using asynchronous controllers in Web APIs, and leveraging Entity Framework Core for non-blocking database calls. Additionally, it advises against using `.Result` or `.Wait()` to prevent deadlocks in ASP.NET Core applications.

Uploaded by

Vijay Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views1 page

In .NET Core, Asynchronous Operatio

The document outlines the implementation of asynchronous operations in .NET Core using the `async` and `await` keywords. It emphasizes the importance of returning `Task` or `Task<T>` in methods, using asynchronous controllers in Web APIs, and leveraging Entity Framework Core for non-blocking database calls. Additionally, it advises against using `.Result` or `.Wait()` to prevent deadlocks in ASP.NET Core applications.

Uploaded by

Vijay Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

In .

NET Core, asynchronous operations are typically implemented using the `async`
and `await` keywords, along with asynchronous programming patterns provided by
the .NET framework. Here's how you can explain your experience with async
operations in an interview setting:

### ✅ **How I Implement Asynchronous Operations in .NET Core Applications**


#### 🔧 1. **Use of `async` and `await`**

* I make methods asynchronous by using the `async` keyword and returning `Task` or
`Task<T>`.
* I use `await` to asynchronously wait for tasks such as database calls, file I/O,
or API requests.

public async Task<User> GetUserAsync(int id)


{
return await _dbContext.Users.FindAsync(id);
}

#### 🌐 2. **Asynchronous Controllers (Web API)**

* In Web APIs, controller actions return `Task<IActionResult>` to avoid blocking


threads and improve scalability.

[HttpGet("{id}")]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetUser(int id)
{
var user = await _userService.GetUserAsync(id);
return Ok(user);
}

#### ⚙️ 3. **Entity Framework Core**

* EF Core supports async operations like `ToListAsync()`, `FirstOrDefaultAsync()`,


`SaveChangesAsync()` to prevent thread blocking on DB calls.

public async Task<List<User>> GetAllUsersAsync()


{
return await _dbContext.Users.ToListAsync();
}
#### 📤 4. **HTTP Client Calls**

* I use `HttpClient.SendAsync()` or `GetAsync()` for non-blocking API calls.

var response = await _httpClient.GetAsync("https://api.example.com/data");

### ⏳ 5. **Avoiding Deadlocks**

* I always `await` tasks instead of calling `.Result` or `.Wait()`, especially in


ASP.NET Core apps to avoid deadlocks and thread pool exhaustion.

You might also like