Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views26 pages

Research Normative Data Report - Hamstring Strain

The Research Normative Data Report compiles normative data on hamstring strain injuries to aid clinicians in rehabilitation and return-to-play decisions. It focuses on muscle length, strength, and function metrics across various populations, primarily addressing Grade I and II injuries while highlighting a significant gender data gap. The report emphasizes the importance of considering the limitations of the aggregated data and encourages further research, particularly involving female athletes.

Uploaded by

Raúl Alfonso
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views26 pages

Research Normative Data Report - Hamstring Strain

The Research Normative Data Report compiles normative data on hamstring strain injuries to aid clinicians in rehabilitation and return-to-play decisions. It focuses on muscle length, strength, and function metrics across various populations, primarily addressing Grade I and II injuries while highlighting a significant gender data gap. The report emphasizes the importance of considering the limitations of the aggregated data and encourages further research, particularly involving female athletes.

Uploaded by

Raúl Alfonso
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Research Normative Data Report

Hamstring Strain Injury


Introduction
The purpose of the Research Based Norms Report is to collate normative data as reported in the literature.
It allows patients to be compared to the general population. These reports provide clinicians with an extra
tool for making decisions with regards to progression during hamstring rehabilitation and return to play
testing. 

We aimed to identify and collect available normative data on muscle length (range of motion), strength, and
function across different populations and age groups in the presence of pathology, injury, or a
musculoskeletal condition. For Hamstring Rehabilitation, it largely concentrates on Performance Metrics.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) were also included. 

The included studies focus on structural injury, mainly including Grade I and II injuries. We have not
included any operative studies or severe injuries (i.e. Grade III , Grade IV, and avulsion type injuries) 

We have grouped the data into two distinctive periods during rehabilitation. This is largely determined by
the data reported in the literature

Two major considerations when reading this project:

The data presented are aggregated from numerous studies and are derived from each other.
Therefore, you may note that the difference in range of motion between the uninjured and injured
limbs may not be the same as the reported difference or deficit between injured and uninjured limbs.
We encourage you to see these as standalone outcomes, and not linked as the data supporting
these outcomes are from numerous independent sources.

Data on women are not available.


Although some studies did include female participants, it was not reported separately and represent
less than 1% of the data included in this report. The gender data gap is highlighted here, and we
actively aim to promote more data collected and reported on women athletes and players.

The underlying data has been rigorously reviewed to ensure the norms are accurate and reliable. Where
appropriate, we have aggregated the data around specific tests and their parameters. However, it’s
important to keep in mind a few limitations:

For most of the included studies, only average and standard deviations of aggregated data were
available. If median and interquartile range was reported, we present this data. Where appropriate,
median and interquartile ranges have been converted to mean and standard deviations.

1 Hamstring Strain Injury – Introduction


Differences between age and gender was not consistently reported.

Different technologies and hardware were used. While we do not feel this represents significant

differences, it is important to acknowledge that differences between these applications exist.

The data mainly reflects studies conducted in soccer (football).

We hope that these insights help you to improve your patients' health. Please consider VALD Normative

Data Reports for distribution and averages across different age groups in healthy populations.

Contents

Initial Assessment ................................... 3

Return to Play ............................................ 9

Week 1 ........................................................ 16

Week 13 ..................................................... 19

Week 26 ..................................................... 21

View included references at end of document

2
Hamstring Strain Injury – Introduction
Hamstring Strain Injury

Initial Assessment

3 Hamstring Strain Injury – Initial Assessment


Initial Assessment
Pain on Palpation

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Length of pain on palpation Injured 3 cm 8 cm 13 cm

Width of pain on palpation Injured 2 cm 4 cm 6 cm

Active Knee Extension Test Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 46° 71° 96°


Range of motion
Uninjured 56° 79° 103°

Deficit compared to
Injured -1° 13° 27°
uninjured side

Difference between injured


Injured -5% 13% 32%
and uninjured side (%)

% of uninjured side Injured 54% 78% 102%

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Range of motion Injured 36° 54° 72°

Deficit compared to
Injured 5° 12° 19°
uninjured side

Difference between injured


Injured -2% 21% 44%
and uninjured side (%)

4 Hamstring Strain Injury – Initial Assessment


Maximal Hip Flexion Active Knee Extension (MHFAKE) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 86° 103° 119°


Range of motion
Uninjured 68° 83° 98°

Difference between injured


Injured -3% 15% 28%
and uninjured side (%)

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Range of motion Injured 79° 93° 107°

Difference between injured


Injured -11% 18% 25%
and uninjured side (%)

Passive Knee Extension Test (PKET) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 14° 34° 55°


Range of motion
Uninjured 17° 36° 56°

Deficit compared to
Injured -4° 2° 8°
uninjured side

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -2° 6° 14°
uninjured side

5 Hamstring Strain Injury – Initial Assessment


Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 52° 68° 84°


Range of motion
Uninjured 70° 84° 99°

Difference between injured


Injured 2% 13% -27%
and uninjured side (%)

% of uninjured side Injured 71% 87% 104%

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Range of motion Injured 44° 62° 81°

Difference between injured


Injured -4% 16% 37%
and uninjured side (%)

Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

0° knee flexion in prone

Deficit compared to
Injured 3N 28 N 53 N
uninjured side

% of uninjured side Injured 42% 68% 95%

15° knee flexion in prone

Injured 66 N 143 N 219 N


Force
Uninjured 183 N 243 N 302 N

Deficit compared to
Injured 24 N 100 N 176 N
uninjured side

6 Hamstring Strain Injury – Initial Assessment


Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

15° knee flexion in prone

Difference between injured


Injured -4% 34% 64%
and uninjured side (%)

% of uninjured side Injured 26% 54% 83%

45° knee flexion in prone

Injured 85 N 144 N 204 N


Force
Uninjured 272 N 278 N 284 N

Difference between injured


Injured 22% 46% 71%
and uninjured side (%)

90° knee 90° hip flexion in prone

Injured 121 N 158 N 196 N


Force
Uninjured 323 N 330 N 337 N

Difference between injured


Injured -5% 22% 48%
and uninjured side (%)

90° knee flexion in prone

Injured 75 N 131 N 187 N


Force
Uninjured 159 N 194 N 229 N

Deficit compared to
Injured -12 N 40 N 92 N
uninjured side

Difference between injured


Injured -2% 29% 56%
and uninjured side (%)

% of uninjured side Injured 22% 46% 71%

7 Hamstring Strain Injury – Initial Assessment


Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

15° knee flexion in prone

% of uninjured side Injured 4% 29% 54%

45° knee flexion in prone

Force Injured 108 N 163 N 217 N

% of uninjured side Injured -8% 27% 45%

90° knee 90° hip flexion in prone

Force Injured 125 N 167 N 209 N

% of uninjured side Injured 0% 16% 33%

90° knee flexion in prone

Force Injured 79 N 128 N 178 N

Difference between injured


Injured -15% 30% 45%
and uninjured side (%)

% of uninjured side Injured -6% 18% 42%

8 Hamstring Strain Injury – Initial Assessment


Hamstring Strain Injury

Return to Play

9 Hamstring Strain Injury – Return to Play


Return to Play
Hamstring Outcome Score (HaOS)

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Score Injured 76 88 100

Pain on Palpation

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Length of pain on palpation Injured -1 cm 0 cm 1 cm

Width of pain on palpation Injured -1 cm 0 cm 1 cm

Active Knee Extension Test (AKET) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 64° 73° 83°


Range of motion
Uninjured 58° 68° 78°

Deficit compared to
Injured -3° 2° 7°
uninjured side

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Range of motion Injured 68° 76° 84°

10 Hamstring Strain Injury – Return to Play


Maximal Hip Flexion Active Knee Extension (MHFAKE) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Range of motion Injured 112° 118° 124°

% of uninjured side Injured 91% 99% 107%

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Range of motion Injured 107° 117° 127°

Passive Knee Extension Test (PKET) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 6° 16° 24°


Range of motion
Uninjured 7° 17° 27°

Deficit compared to
Injured 3° 1° -5°
uninjured side

% of uninjured side Injured 96% 100% 105%

Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 70° 82° 93°


Range of motion
Uninjured 68° 82° 96°

% of uninjured side Injured 96% 100% 105%

11 Hamstring Strain Injury – Return to Play


Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Available on DynaMo

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Range of motion Injured 69° 80° 90°

Sprint Test Available on SmartSpeed

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

5m sprint time Injured 1.27s 1.36s 1.46s

10m sprint time Injured 1.99s 2.12s 2.24s

40-yard sprint time Injured 4.55s 4.7s 6.85s

Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

15° knee flexion in prone

Deficit compared to
Injured -15N 1N 17N
uninjured side

45° knee flexion in prone

Force Injured 192 N 248 N 304 N

% of uninjured side Injured 78% 95% 111%

90° knee 90° hip flexion in prone

Force Injured 192 N 231 N 270 N

% of uninjured side Injured 84% 97% 111%

12 Hamstring Strain Injury – Return to Play


Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

90° knee flexion in prone

Force Injured 147 N 174 N 200 N

Deficit compared to
Injured -13 N 2N 17 N
uninjured side

% of uninjured side Injured 78% 94% 110%

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

45° knee flexion in prone

Force Injured 202 N 255 N 307 N

90° knee 90° hip flexion in prone

Force Injured 176 N 242 N 307 N

90° knee flexion in prone

Force Injured 144 N 184 N 223 N

Nordic Hamstring Exercise Available on NordBord

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 213 N 301 N 389 N


Peak force
Uninjured 212 N 316 N 420 N

Peak force imbalance Injured -11 N 3N 16 N

13 Hamstring Strain Injury – Return to Play


Nordic Hamstring Exercise Available on NordBord

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Injured 193 N 280 N 367 N


Average force
Uninjured 188 N 289 N 390 N

Average force imbalance Injured -14 N 1N 16 N

Isokinetic Dynamometer

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Knee Flexor Concentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 84 Nm 110 Nm 137 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 96 Nm 124 Nm 153 Nm

Difference between injured


Injured 5% 18% 32%
and uninjured side (%)

Knee Flexor Concentric Peak Torque @ 180°/s

Torque Injured 59 Nm 87 Nm 115 Nm

Knee Flexor Concentric Peak Torque @ 300°/s

Injured 65 Nm 87 Nm 110 Nm
Torque
Uninjured 77 Nm 97 Nm 117 Nm

Difference between injured


Injured 10% 25% 41%
and uninjured side (%)

14 Hamstring Strain Injury – Return to Play


Isokinetic Dynamometer

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Knee Flexor Eccentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 143 Nm 188 Nm 234 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 154 Nm 197 Nm 240 Nm

Difference between injured


Injured 6% 22% 38%
and uninjured side (%)

Knee Extensor Concentric Peak Torque@ 60°/s

Injured 187 Nm 229 Nm 271 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 183 Nm 231 Nm 278 Nm

Difference between injured


Injured 8% 22% 37%
and uninjured side (%)

Knee Extensor Concentric Peak Torque @ 300°/s

Injured 114 Nm 139 Nm 164 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 117 Nm 141 Nm 165 Nm

Difference between injured


Injured 8% 23% 37%
and uninjured side (%)

15 Hamstring Strain Injury – Return to Play


Hamstring Strain Injury

Week 1

16 Hamstring Strain Injury – Week 1


Week 1
Active Knee Extension Test (AKET) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -7° 3° 13°
uninjured side

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -2° 7° 16°
uninjured side

Passive Knee Extension Test (PKET) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -3° 2° 7°
uninjured side

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -1° 2° 5°
uninjured side

Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

15° knee flexion in prone

Force Injured 107 N 128 N 149 N

90° knee flexion in prone

Force Injured 91 N 108 N 125 N

17 Hamstring Strain Injury – Week 1


Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

15° knee flexion in prone

Difference between injured


Injured -7.5% 13% 33.5%
and uninjured side (%)

90° knee flexion in prone

Difference between injured


Injured -8.5% 9% 26.5%
and uninjured side (%)

18 Hamstring Strain Injury – Week 1


Hamstring Strain Injury

Week 13

19 Hamstring Strain Injury – Week 13


Week 13
Isokinetic Dynamometer

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Knee Flexor Concentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 86 Nm 114 Nm 143 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 99 Nm 130 Nm 161 Nm

Knee Flexor Eccentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 132 Nm 168 Nm 204 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 144 Nm 176 Nm 208 Nm

Knee Extensor Concentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 187 Nm 225 Nm 263 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 181 Nm 229 Nm 278 Nm

Knee Extensor Eccentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 208 Nm 267 Nm 326 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 191 Nm 259 Nm 327 Nm

20 Hamstring Strain Injury – Week 13


Hamstring Strain Injury

Week 26

21 Hamstring Strain Injury – Week 26


Week 26
Active Knee Extension Test (AKET) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -6° -1° 4°
uninjured side

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -4° 1° 6°
uninjured side

Passive Knee Extension Test (PKET) Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -8° -2° 4°
uninjured side

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Deficit compared to
Injured -6° 0° 6°
uninjured side

Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

20 – 30 years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

15° knee flexion in prone

Difference between injured


Injured -14% 2% 18%
and uninjured side (%)

90° knee flexion in prone


Difference between injured
Injured -12% 2% 16%
and uninjured side (%)

22 Hamstring Strain Injury – Week 26


Hand Held Dynamometer Available on DynaMo

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

15° knee flexion in prone

Difference between injured


Injured -13% 1% 15%
and uninjured side (%)

90° knee flexion in prone

Difference between injured


Injured -12% 1% 14%
and uninjured side (%)

Isokinetic Dynamometer

30+ years old

Metric Limb Standard deviation (-1) Average Standard deviation (+1)

Knee Flexor Concentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 95 Nm 124 Nm 153 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 101 Nm 129 Nm 156 Nm

Knee Flexor Eccentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 140 Nm 177 Nm 213 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 138 Nm 176 Nm 214 Nm

Knee Extensor Concentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 179 Nm 226 Nm 274 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 182 Nm 230 Nm 278 Nm

Knee Extensor Eccentric Peak Torque @ 60°/s

Injured 226 Nm 276 Nm 325 Nm


Torque
Uninjured 204 Nm 272 Nm 340 Nm

23 Hamstring Strain Injury – Week 26


References
Vermeulen R, Whiteley R, Van der Made AD, Van Dyk N, Almusa E, Geertsema C, Targett S, Farooq A, Bahr R,
Tol JL, Wangensteen A. Early versus delayed lengthening exercises for acute hamstring injury in male
athletes: a randomised controlled clinical trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022 Jul
1;56(14):792-800. 

Whiteley R, van Dyk N, Wangensteen A, Hansen C. Clinical implications from daily physiotherapy
examination of 131 acute hamstring injuries and their association with running speed and rehabilitation
progression. British journal of sports medicine. 2018 Mar 1;52(5):303-10. 

Jacobsen P, Witvrouw E, Muxart P, Tol JL, Whiteley R. A combination of initial and follow-up physiotherapist
examination predicts physician-determined time to return to play after hamstring injury, with no added value
of MRI. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016 Apr 1;50(7):431-9. 

Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Moen MH, Weir A, Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Maas M, Tol JL. Rationale,
secondary outcome scores and 1-year follow-up of a randomised trial of platelet-rich plasma injections in
acute hamstring muscle injury: the Dutch Hamstring Injection Therapy study. British journal of sports
medicine. 2015 Sep 1;49(18):1206-12. 

De Vos RJ, Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Moen MH, Weir A, Tol JL. Clinical findings just after return to play
predict hamstring re-injury, but baseline MRI findings do not. British journal of sports medicine. 2014 Sep
1;48(18):1377-84. 

Hickey JT, Timmins RG, Maniar N, Rio E, Hickey PF, Pitcher CA, Williams MD, Opar DA. Pain-free versus pain-
threshold rehabilitation following acute hamstring strain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of
Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2020 Feb;50(2):91-103. 

Hamilton B, Tol JL, Almusa E, Boukarroum S, Eirale C, Farooq A, Whiteley R, Chalabi H. Platelet-rich plasma
does not enhance return to play in hamstring injuries: a randomised controlled trial. British journal of sports
medicine. 2015 Jul 1;49(14):943-50. 

Zein MI, Mokkenstorm MJ, Cardinale M, Holtzhausen L, Whiteley R, Moen MH, Reurink G, Tol JL. Baseline
clinical and MRI risk factors for hamstring reinjury showing the value of performing baseline MRI and
delaying return to play: a multicentre, prospective cohort of 330 acute hamstring injuries. British Journal of
Sports Medicine. 2024 May 10. 

Mendiguchia J, Martinez-Ruiz E, Edouard P, Morin JB, Martinez-Martinez F, Idoate F, Mendez-Villanueva A. A


multifactorial, criteria-based progressive algorithm for hamstring injury treatment. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
2017 Jul 1;49(7):1482-92.

24 Hamstring Strain Injury – References


Sherry MA, Best TM. A comparison of 2 rehabilitation programs in the treatment of acute hamstring strains.
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2004 Mar;34(3):116-25. 

Tol JL, Hamilton B, Eirale C, Muxart P, Jacobsen P, Whiteley R. At return to play following hamstring injury
the majority of professional football players have residual isokinetic deficits. British journal of sports
medicine. 2014 Sep 1;48(18):1364-9. 

Silder AM, Sherry MA, Sanfilippo J, Tuite MJ, Hetzel SJ, Heiderscheit BC. Clinical and morphological
changes following 2 rehabilitation programs for acute hamstring strain injuries: a randomized clinical trial.
journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2013 May;43(5):284-99. 

Medeiros DM, Marchiori C, Baroni BM. Effect of nordic hamstring exercise training on knee flexors eccentric
strength and fascicle length: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2020
Oct 12;30(3):482-91. 

A Hamid MS, Mohamed Ali MR, Yusof A, George J, Lee LP. Platelet-rich plasma injections for the treatment
of hamstring injuries: a randomized controlled trial. The American journal of sports medicine. 2014
Oct;42(10):2410-8. 

Moen MH, Reurink G, Weir A, Tol JL, Maas M, Goudswaard GJ. Predicting return to play after hamstring
injuries. British journal of sports medicine. 2014 Sep 1;48(18):1358-63. 

Bayer ML, Hoegberget‐Kalisz M, Jensen MH, Olesen JL, Svensson RB, Couppé C, Boesen M, Nybing JD, Kurt
EY, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. Role of tissue perfusion, muscle strength recovery, and pain in rehabilitation
after acute muscle strain injury: A randomized controlled trial comparing early and delayed rehabilitation.
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2018 Dec;28(12):2579-91. 

Van Dyk N, Wangensteen A, Vermeulen R, Whiteley R, Bahr R, Tol JL, Witvrouw E. Similar Isokinetic Strength
Preinjury and at Return to Sport after Hamstring Injury. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2019
Jun 1;51(6):1091-8.

25 Hamstring Strain Injury – References

You might also like