Women Leadership
Women Leadership
net/publication/371216449
CITATION READS
1 1,290
1 author:
Ahmad Muktamar B
Institut Lamaddukkelleng Sengkang Indonesia
58 PUBLICATIONS 356 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ahmad Muktamar B on 01 June 2023.
Article history: This study describes women's leadership with a focus on examining
women's capacity as leaders. The aim is to identify whether
Received Nov 26, 2022
leadership is more effective and has better performance than male
Revised Dec 03, 2022
leadership. This type of research uses library research with analytic
Accepted Dec 17, 2022
descriptive methods. The data in this study were obtained from
books, journals, websites and other references related to the research
Keywords: topic. The approach used in this study is a feminist approach that
Leadership focuses on gender issues related to leadership. Another approach is
Women Leadership the philosophical approach, as well as the historical approach. In this
Gender study it was found that women taking leadership are related to
Leadership Style feminine character, namely 1) Caring, 2) Vision, 3) Collaboration, 4)
Courage, and 5) Intuition. It was also found that there are four
factors that influence women's leadership, namely: Mother,
Seductress, Pet and Iron Maiden. In addition, women are also
supported by a transformational style and feminism in their
leadership. Meanwhile, women's success in leading is supported by
feminist ethics, namely 1) Maternal Thinking, 2) Caring, and 3)
Ethich of Care.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Corresponding Author:
Ahmad Muktamar B,
Manajemen,
Institut Lamaddukkelleng,
Jl. Bosowa Utara No. 1 Palaguna, Sengkang, 90971, Indonesia,
Email: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
The debate between whether or not women are allowed to hold leadership positions in an
organization, company, or country has been a long discussion in various study forums. The
fundamental question that is often the topic of discussion is the role of women at the top of the
managerial, that whether women as individuals have the capacity or ability to manage an
organization or institution with all its dynamics.
Although many parties still doubt the ability of women to hold leadership positions, the
fact is that the number of women occupying top positions in organizations shows an increasing
trend from year to year. In the last ten years, in the United States, almost 50% of the talent pool was
occupied by women, and more than 51% held managerial positions (Akmala, 2022).
As Windsor et al noted that female leaders tend to be more successful and gain trust with
regard to solving complex problems. His compassionate and relatable approach in communicating
makes the public feel comfortable in his leadership. This study noted that countries led by women
have fared better than countries led by men during the pandemic (Windsor et al., 2020).
Research conducted by Women in the Workplace 2021 by McKinsey & Company, found
that women's leadership in the business and public sectors can create healthier organizations. The
research also shows that women's leadership is able to produce comprehensive and inclusive
decisions because it considers various aspects. Women's sensitivity is considered capable of
formulating company strategies that suit consumer needs and encourage increased company
financial performance (Hamdani, 2022).
Juwita was quoted by Handayani, revealing that Indonesia is ranked fourth with the most
female leaders in the world with a percentage of 37% (Handayani, 2021). Akmala, for example,
noted that in Indonesia currently, 6 important positions in the Advanced Indonesia cabinet are
occupied by women (Akmala, 2022). Meanwhile Hartati described that 38% of the leaders of
private tertiary institutions in Jakarta were held by women (Hartati, 2022).
But unfortunately, women's leadership in Indonesia is still not ideal (Hamdani, 2022),
especially when compared to the female population itself. As noted by Narimawati and Praratya,
that the percentage of women as leaders compared to the female population as a whole is much
lower than the percentage of men as leaders. Another fact is related to the proportion of women in
the work force and business, from the past until now, trade business has been quite attractive to
women. However, when it comes to obtaining business expansion assistance, women
entrepreneurs are included in the recipient group with small and medium capital (Narimawati &
Praratya, 2022).
Data from The Gender Social Norms Index, UNDP, 2020, shows the fact that almost 90% of
men and women themselves still have some sort of bias against women (Hamdani, 2022). The 2020
World Economic Forum (WEF) report shows the Global Gender Gap score (based on population) is
at 68.6%. This means that there is still a 31.4% gap which is homework for the global community.
According to the same source, Indonesia is ranked 85th in terms of gender gap. Meanwhile, data
from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) for 2019, which published the Gender Empowerment
Index using a measuring instrument for placing women as professionals in Indonesia, shows
figures in the range of 35% to 55% (Handayani, 2021).
In a patriarchal culture, women are positioned in a marginal corner, where male hegemony
is a being of superiority who considers women as subordinate and inferior to men. The patriarchal
system places the role of men as the sole ruler, central and main controller, while women have no
rights, are shackled and receive discriminatory treatment (Sakina & A, 2017).
The cultural aspect places women as parties who are subject to patriarchal power relations,
both personally and through state arrangements. Since ancient times, the culture of society in
various parts of the world has placed men at the top of the hierarchy, while women are positioned
at the lowest class. This can be seen in Roman civilization, since birth a woman is completely under
the power of her father. After marriage, power passes into the hands of the husband. This includes
the authority to sell, expel, abuse or kill women. In Chinese civilization, a woman's life follows the
death of her husband, who must be burned alive along with the burning of her husband's body. In
the practice of Hindu society in the Vedic era in 1500 BC, women did not receive inheritance.
Whereas in the tradition of the Buddhist community in 1500 BC, women were married off before
reaching the age of puberty, and did not receive education, so most of them became illiterate
(Sakina & A, 2017).
In Indonesia, during the Dutch and Japanese colonial eras, the situation for women was no
less bleak. Women are used as sex slaves for foreign soldiers who are on duty in Indonesia. As well
as women are prohibited from receiving education, except for those who come from the nobility or
priyayi (Sakina & A, 2017).
In 1805 British legislation emphasized the husband's right to be able to sell his wife
(Narimawati & Praratya, 2022). In 1882 British women did not yet have the right to own property
and the right to be prosecuted in court. Meanwhile in the United States, the situation for women is
no better. Elizabeth Blackwill, the world's first female doctor who completed her studies at Geneve
University in 1849, had to suffer the bad luck of being boycotted by her own friends on the pretext
that it was not natural for women to obtain higher education. At the same time, discriminatory
behavior was also carried out by a medical professional organization in Philadelphia which
rejected the establishment of a women's medical institute. The organization has threatened to
boycott all doctors who are willing to teach on the campus (Narimawati & Praratya, 2022).
As human civilization progresses, views that tend to marginalize women gradually begin
to erode. The term women's emancipation and the demand for gender equality began to emerge
and were fought for massively in almost all over the world. Although the reality is not easy to
achieve, because this emergence infects patriarchal constructions that have been going on for
generations, where patriarchy has always distinguished the roles of men and women (Budiarta,
2022).
In the Indonesian context, the gender justice movement began in the 1980s. In 1978, the
role of women in Indonesia's development was included in the GBHN. It mandates that women
have equality with men regarding rights and obligations as well as equal opportunities to
participate in development. Likewise with guarantees to be fully and effectively involved and
equal opportunities to lead at all levels of decision-making in social, political and economic life
(Nurmi et al., 2019).
After the passing of the law, women's representation in political parties opened up
opportunities for women to engage more broadly in the public and political spheres. With this
development, it is undeniable that the role of women has experienced a new pattern. Although
their involvement in formal institutions is not encouraging enough. The percentage of women as
leaders compared to the population, which reaches half of the population, is still much lower than
the percentage of men as leaders (Narimawati & Praratya, 2022).
One factor is the low percentage of women as leaders, is the view that being a leader is still
associated with biological aspects based on gender differences (Yulianti et al., 2018). The
emergence of this construction of thought is triggered by the existence of gender stereotypes which
contain beliefs about what behavior is appropriate for men or women to do. Likewise, the
stereotype that women do not seem to have strong and capable characters as leaders (Budiarta,
2022). There is also a growing assumption that women do not need to be involved in making or
making political and public decisions, because roles have been mapped out for men. men in the
public sphere, while women are in the domestic sphere.
In the midst of the onslaught of stereotypes against women, nowadays the gender
perspective has relatively shifted and is no longer the dominant factor in determining the roles of
men and women (Yulianti et al., 2018). The phenomenon of many jobs that were previously only
done by men can now be done women very well, as if supporting Yulianti's view. Various types of
work are now also carried out by women, such as military service, police, pilots, taxi/bus drivers,
heavy equipment drivers, OJOL drivers, mining foremen, gas station attendants, workers in the
field of construction, and so on, which proves that men and women have the same capabilities,
including the role of women as leaders in the public, political, organizational and institutional
spheres.
In an organization or institution, the dominance of men as leaders is still very strong. But
in reality, women also have potential that is not inferior to men in terms of leading (Fitriani, 2015).
Figures like RA Kartini, Cut Nyak Dhien, and Andi Ninnong are examples of women who have
strong historical roots as leaders. Today, not only are leaders at the village and sub-district levels, it
is now no longer difficult to find areas at the district or provincial level, where the leadership is
held by a woman. Likewise, the highest position in government has been held by Megawati
Soekarnoputri, the first female figure to have served as president in Indonesia. The phenomenon of
Indonesian women in the modern era who appear to be leaders by occupying various important
positions both in the public and domestic spheres shows that their personal abilities are on par
with men.
Leadership is inseparable from the personal abilities of individuals who act as leaders.
Personal ability is the capacity of an individual to carry out various tasks in leadership (Sinaga,
2018), which is obtained thanks to potential and innate talent in the form of a leadership base.
Thus, the value that is considered the most dominant in leadership is personal quality related to
capacity and skills.
Naturally, a person or member of a group wants others to guide, direct, motivate, and
supervise them. Because the success of a leader is determined by the quality of his leadership in
carrying out these functions (Muktamar B, 2022). Thus, leadership has nothing to do with gender,
instead women and men are equal in the concept of leadership.
Organizations are usually led by a man, but in reality now, women are also required to be
able to take part as organizational leaders. But the problem is whether women's leadership is more
effective and has better performance than male leadership? Therefore the discussion on women's
leadership is discussed further in this article to describe how far the capacity of women to become
leaders.
RESEARCH METHOD
The type of research in this paper is library research with analytic descriptive method. The data in
this study were obtained from books, journals, websites and other references related to the research
topic. The approach used is a feminist approach that focuses on gender issues related to leadership.
In addition, a philosophical approach is used to highlight women's leadership from a value or
ethical perspective. This study also uses a historical approach to examine the historical
development of women's leadership in the past compared to current conditions. Relevant data
were collected, then analyzed content, critical discourse, deductive and inductive. Content analysis
was carried out to read various references based on their essence. Critical discourse analysis is
used to examine discourse related to women's leadership. Meanwhile, deductive and inductive
analysis is carried out to obtain data through searching at the beginning and at the end of the data
which can be used as a certain conclusion.
Gender is not enough just to refer to the characteristics that are physical or biological.
Because after living in society, men and women experience things that are different from one
another. Humans or society then gives certain characteristics based on their interpretation of the
functions and abilities of both men and women. In every culture, humans provide or complement
these biological characteristics with non-biological (social) characteristics related to characteristics,
characteristics, work, norms and appropriateness (values) for men and women (Wiasti, 2017).
Many people perceive that gender is the same as sex, but in reality the two have different
meanings. Gender is a biological difference; which is the nature of God and therefore permanently
different between men and women. Meanwhile, gender can be interpreted as a social construction
of sex, into social roles and behaviors. Gender comes from the Latin "genus" which means kind or
type. Gender can be defined as a condition in which individuals who are born biologically as male
and female then acquire social characteristics through the attributes of masculinity and femininity
which are supported by values or systems and symbols in society. Gender is a visible difference
between men and women when viewed from values and behavior, or it can also be referred to as
behavioral differences that are attached to men and women (Fauzia, 2020).
Gender differences are related to the characteristics of masculinity and femininity. The
nature of masculinity is that men are considered strong, productive, public, rational and assertive,
the main breadwinners, so often in society there is a gender bias where men are considered taboo
when doing housework such as cooking, cleaning the house and taking care of children.
Meanwhile, femininity, that is, women are known to be gentle, reproductive, domestic, emotional,
motherly, affective, and irrational, additional breadwinners who often have gender bias, such as
women doubt their ability to occupy a position in work.
Gender characteristics are traits that can actually be exchanged. For example, women are
known as gentle, emotional and motherly. While men are considered as strong, rational, mighty. In
Yulianti's notes, et al, that there are men who are emotional, gentle and motherly. Vice versa, there
are women who are strong, rational and mighty (Yulianti et al., 2018). These changes can occur
from time to time, in various situations and from place to place.
Gender differences between men and women occur through a very long historical
selection. The formation of gender differences is due to many things including; formed, socialized,
strengthened and even constructed socially or culturally either through the state or religious
teachings. Through this long process, many people who do not know, then consider gender
characteristics, as God's decrees that seem to be biological and cannot be changed anymore, so that
gender differences are considered and understood as the nature of men or women (Fauzia, 2020).
One example of the confusion in understanding society that is not in place, where social
construction related to the characteristics of gender differences is actually considered as nature
which means God's provision. For example educating children, managing and caring for
cleanliness and all domestic affairs are considered "Women's Nature". In reality, that women have
a gender role in educating children and doing all domestic affairs is a cultural construction in
certain societies. Therefore, perhaps the affairs of educating children and keeping the house clean
can also be done by men.
Women's Leadership
Leadership is an object of discourse that is widely discussed by management experts. Leadership
can be interpreted as a process of influencing, inviting, moving, encouraging, guiding or guiding
others to think, behave, act in accordance with predetermined goals (Muktamar B, 2022).
Etymologically, the term leadership comes from the word lead, which means to demand or guide,
hence the verb "to lead" was born which means to guide and mentor (Muktamar B, 2022).
Whereas women's leadership is defined as the ability of a woman to carry out activities of
influencing, moving, directing, inviting, motivating, ordering, advising, guiding, prohibiting and
even (if necessary) punishing, and fostering with the intention that members or subordinates want
to work to achieve common goals. effective and efficient (Sugiyanto, 2020)
name of moral principles. Noddings offers a different approach that is rooted in receptive,
relatedness, and responsiveness.
Meanwhile, the Ethic of Care is a thought related to the benchmarks of the moral
development of men and women, which are fundamentally different. These differences include;
the foundation of women's morality is based on the principle of unification, namely the existence
of relationships with other people. Men are more autonomous, emphasizing freedom and
independence. Men emphasize justice more, treat others objectively and openly. Meanwhile,
women put more emphasis on caring and women will be more concerned about the suffering of
others.
Basically, women have the basic traits to be successful as leaders. They tend to be more
patient, empathetic, and multitasking. Women have a talent for networking and negotiating.
Women are also responsible and like to overcome challenges in their work. Since ancient times,
women and men have done different jobs. The tasks they do require different skills. It is cultural
factors that influence how women and men act and think. Men are required to be assertive in
leading. But when a woman is assertive, she is often called aggressive. Women in leadership tend
to be more democratic, they encourage participation, share power and information and try to
increase the benefits for their followers. On the other hand, men tend to use a type of leadership
that is based on control and orders, they are more based on positions of formal authority as the
basis for their influence.
Some of the factors that impede the advancement of women in leadership are the lack of
policies in organizations that support balance between family and work, especially for women who
have families. Nevertheless, many companies have started to be women friendly. The company
provides opportunities for women to pursue their careers, and produces women who are
successful in their careers and families. They are aware that providing opportunities for women to
rise to leadership positions is a strategic and humane step to advance the organization.
The success of women in managing the household can be an asset as well as an advantage
in leading. There are at least six advantages of women which are the capital of success in leading.
These advantages are: 1) More sensitive to the needs of others, 2) More commitment to upholding
the needs and rights of women, children, the elderly, disabled groups, minorities, and
marginalized and persecuted groups; 3) Caring more about health and reproduction, child care,
education, welfare, and the environment; 4) Tend not to be materialistic and act peacefully (non-
violent); 5) More realistic, practical in work, more flexible in changes; 6) It's easier to do solid
teamwork, be more thorough, diligent, thrifty, careful, honest, neat, and more tolerant
(Narimawati & Praratya, 2022).
Based on some of these opinions, it can be understood that women are creatures capable of
doing many things (multi-tasking) and all of them can be done with the same concentration. This is
not found in men who are less able to deal with the complexity of problems and tend to fix them
one by one, while women want everything to be done quickly and understand the problems to be
prioritized so that solutions can be faster.
CONCLUSION
The debate between whether or not women are allowed to hold leadership positions in an
organization, company, or country has been a long discussion in various study forums. The
fundamental question that is often the topic of discussion is the role of women at the top of the
managerial, that whether women as individuals have the capacity or ability to manage an
organization or institution with all its dynamics.
Women's leadership is still not ideal, as seen from the percentage of women as leaders
compared to the population, which is still much lower than the percentage of men as leaders. This
is caused by the construction of the thought that being a leader is associated with biological aspects
based on gender differences. The existence of gender stereotypes is the main trigger, namely
impressions or beliefs about what behavior is appropriate for men or women. As well as the
stereotype that women don't seem to have a strong character and are qualified as leaders. Along
with the times, the gender perspective has relatively shifted and is no longer the dominant factor in
determining the roles of men and women. Jobs that were previously only done by men can now be
done by women very well. Likewise with the phenomenon of women in the modern era who
appear to be leaders by occupying various important positions both in the public and domestic
spheres, demonstrating their personal abilities on a par with men.
The application of the right leadership style encourages the realization of effective
women's leadership. Transformational and feminism are the styles that are most attached to or
relevant to women's leadership. Transformational leadership inspires and motivates members to
achieve planned results. Meanwhile, feminism is a leadership style that is needed today, as a
counterbalance to the domination of masculine ethics. It was found that there are five feminist
attributes attached to women's leadership, namely 1) Caring, defined as a commitment to act on
behalf of others; 2) Vision, namely the ability to articulate and formulate original ideas; 3)
Collaboration, namely the ability to work in groups; 4) Courage, intended as the ability to move
forward, seek new ideas in the world of practice; and 5) Intuition, namely the ability to give equal
weight to experience and abstraction, mind and heart.
It was also found that there are four factors that influence women's leadership, namely:
Mother, Seductress, Pet and Iron Maiden. Mother, is a woman who sometimes finds herself
becoming a mother in an organization. Meanwhile, Seductress shows that women's leadership
roles are more filled with elements of competition and jealousy. While Pet, is a favorite character.
Then Iron Maiden, is a change in the present, a role where strong women take an important role.
The success of women with a feminist style is rooted in concrete experience as a mother.
This becomes a feminist ethic that women 1) Maternal Thinking, where the way of thinking is not
dominated by men but women too; 2) Carring is a comparison between ethics and rational
principles such as the principles of proposition, justification, and justice; 3) Ethich of Care is related
to the standard of male and female moral development which is fundamentally different. Men are
more autonomous, emphasizing freedom, independence, justice, objective and open. Meanwhile,
women put more emphasis on caring, especially caring about the suffering of others.
References
Akmala, L. A. (2022). DILEMA PEMIMPIN PEREMPUAN DALAM ISLAM.
https://fpscs.uii.ac.id/blog/2022/07/29/dilema-pemimpin-perempuan-dalam-islam/
Budiarta, I. W. (2022). Kepemimpinan Perempuan dalam Sistem Kekerabatan Purusa: Legitimasi Sejarah atas
Kepemimpinan Politik Perempuan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 8(1), 23–33.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v8i1.40982
Faturrahman, B. M. (2018). Aktualisasi Nilai Demokrasi dalam Perekrutan dan Penjaringan Perangkat Desa.
Jurnal Sosial Politik, 4(1), 132–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v4i1.5557
Fauzia, F. A. (2020). Mengenal Kembali Analisis Gender dan Ketidakadilan. Pimpinan Cabang Ikatan Mahasiswa
Muhammadiyah Kota Surabaya. https://immsurabaya.or.id/mengenal-kembali-analisis-gender-dan-
ketidakadilan/
Fitriani, A. (2015). GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN PEREMPUAN. Jurnal Tapis, 11(2), 1–24.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v11i2.845
Hamdani, T. (2022). Begini Tantangan Berat Perempuan Jadi Seorang Pemimpin. DetikFinance.
https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-6047264/begini-tantangan-berat-perempuan-jadi-
seorang-pemimpin
Handayani, I. (2021). Indonesia Peringkat Keempat Pemimpin Perempuan Terbanyak di Dun. Investor.Id.
https://investor.id/national/246322/indonesia-peringkat-keempat-pemimpin-perempuan-terbanyak-
di-dunia
Hartati, E. R. (2022). Peluang Perempuan untuk Jadi Pemimpin Makin Besar. Investor.Id.
https://investor.id/national/295018/peluang-perempuan-untuk-jadi-pemimpin-makin-besar
Muktamar B, A. (2022). KHM Yunus Martan Leadership Type in the Development of Pesasntren As’adiyah.