Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
11 views2 pages

Statistics

The document presents statistical analyses of pre-test and post-test scores from 18 respondents, indicating a significant improvement in scores after intervention (p = 0.000). The normality tests confirm that the data is normally distributed, validating the use of parametric tests. Additionally, a One-Way ANOVA analysis shows no significant differences between groups in the pre-test scores (p = 0.850).

Uploaded by

Aulia Septi cahyani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
11 views2 pages

Statistics

The document presents statistical analyses of pre-test and post-test scores from 18 respondents, indicating a significant improvement in scores after intervention (p = 0.000). The normality tests confirm that the data is normally distributed, validating the use of parametric tests. Additionally, a One-Way ANOVA analysis shows no significant differences between groups in the pre-test scores (p = 0.850).

Uploaded by

Aulia Septi cahyani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Aulia Septi Cahyani (A12122133)

Lara Asy Astuti (A12122152)


Nur Ainun Magfira (A12122137)

Table 1.1

"Based on Table 1.1, the Paired Sample T-Test results on 18 respondents showed a
significant increase in scores between the pre-test (mean 58.94) and post-test (mean 86.39).
The correlation between pre-test and post-test was 0.450 with p = 0.061, indicating a
moderate but non-significant relationship. However, the mean difference between pre-test
and post-test was highly significant (p = 0.000) with a t-value of -14.057. This suggests that
the intervention had a significant impact on score improvement."

Table 1.2

"According to Table 1.2, the null hypothesis states that *the median difference between pre-
test and post-test is zero*. The test results show a significance value (*Sig.*) of 0.000, which
is much smaller than the alpha value of 0.05. Therefore, the test decision is *"Reject the null
hypothesis"*, which implies that the data does not follow a normal distribution, or at least the
normality assumption is not met."
Table 1.3

"Based on Table 1.3, the normality test results show that the pre-test and post-test data are
normally distributed. The significance values for both tests are greater than 0.05, namely
0.200 and 0.227 (pre-test) and 0.543 (post-test). Thus, the normality assumption is met,
making the use of parametric tests like paired t-test valid. The pre-test and post-test data
meet the requirements for further analysis using parametric methods."

Table 1.4

"Based on Table 1.4, the One-Way ANOVA analysis results on the pre-test data are
presented. The purpose of this ANOVA test is to determine whether there are significant
differences between groups in the pre-test scores. According to the table, the significance
value (Sig.) is 0.850, which is much greater than the significance threshold of 0.05. This
means that *there are no significant differences between the groups compared in the pre-
test data*. The F value of 0.498 indicates that the variation between groups is relatively
small compared to the variation within groups."

You might also like