Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views5 pages

Tutorial Notes 3

The document contains tutorial notes on complex analysis, focusing on properties of the complex exponential function and the Cauchy-Riemann equations. It includes problems that derive inequalities involving the modulus of complex exponentials, conditions for equality, and the application of the chain rule to complex functions. The notes conclude with a proof of analyticity using the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Uploaded by

0715 hky
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views5 pages

Tutorial Notes 3

The document contains tutorial notes on complex analysis, focusing on properties of the complex exponential function and the Cauchy-Riemann equations. It includes problems that derive inequalities involving the modulus of complex exponentials, conditions for equality, and the application of the chain rule to complex functions. The notes conclude with a proof of analyticity using the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Uploaded by

0715 hky
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Tutorial Notes 3

1. (a) Write | exp(2z + i)| and | exp(iz 2 )| in terms of x and y. Then show
that
| exp(2z + i)| + | exp(iz 2 )| ≤ e2x + e−2xy .
(b) Show that | exp(z 2 )| ≤ exp(|z|2 ).
(c) Prove that | exp(−2z)| < 1 if and only if Re z > 0.

2. Show that exp(iz) = exp(iz) if and only if z = nπ (n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . ).

3. (a) Recall (Sec. 6) that if z = x + iy, then:


z + z̄ z − z̄
x= , y= .
2 2i
By formally applying the chain rule in calculus to a function F (x, y) of two real
variables, derive the expression:
 
∂F ∂F ∂x ∂F ∂y 1 ∂F ∂F
= + = +i .
∂ z̄ ∂x ∂ z̄ ∂y ∂ z̄ 2 ∂x ∂y

(b) Define the operator:


 
∂ 1 ∂ ∂
= +i ,
∂ z̄ 2 ∂x ∂y

suggested by part (a), to show that if the first-order partial derivatives of the
real and imaginary components of a function f (z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) satisfy
the Cauchy-Riemann equations, then:
∂f 1
= [(ux − vy ) + i(vx + uy )] = 0.
∂ z̄ 2
∂f
Thus derive the complex form ∂ z̄ = 0 of the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

1
Problem 1(a): Express | exp(2z + i)| and | exp(iz 2 )|
in terms of x and y, and show that
| exp(2z + i)| + | exp(iz 2 )| ≤ e2x + e−2xy .
Solution:
For any complex number z = x + iy,

exp(z) = ex eiy .

Since |eiy | = 1, we get:


| exp(z)| = ex .
- For | exp(2z + i)|:

| exp(2z + i)| = | exp(2x + 2iy + i)| = e2x |ei(2y+1) | = e2x .

- For | exp(iz 2 )|: Let z 2 = (x + iy)2 = x2 − y 2 + 2ixy,


2
−y 2 )
| exp(iz 2 )| = | exp(i(x2 − y 2 + 2ixy))| = |e−2xy ei(x | = e−2xy .

Summing:
| exp(2z + i)| + | exp(iz 2 )| = e2x + e−2xy .
Thus, the inequality is satisfied.

Problem 1(b): Show that | exp(z 2 )| ≤ exp(|z|2 ).


Solution:
Let z = x + iy, then:
z 2 = x2 − y 2 + 2ixy.
Thus,
2
−y 2 i2xy
exp(z 2 ) = ex e .
Taking the modulus:
2
−y 2 i2xy 2
−y 2
| exp(z 2 )| = |ex e | = ex .

Since |z|2 = x2 + y 2 , we have:


2
−y 2 2
+y 2
ex ≤ ex .

Thus:
| exp(z 2 )| ≤ exp(|z|2 ).

2
Problem 1(c): Prove that | exp(−2z)| < 1 if and
only if Re(z) > 0.
Solution:
exp(−2z) = e−2x e−i2y .
Taking the modulus:

| exp(−2z)| = |e−2x e−i2y | = e−2x .

For | exp(−2z)| < 1, we need:


e−2x < 1.
Since e−2x is always positive, this holds if and only if:

−2x < 0 ⇒ x > 0.

Thus, | exp(−2z)| < 1 if and only if Re(z) > 0.

Problem 2: Show that:


exp(iz) = exp(iz)
if and only if:
z = nπ, n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .

Solution:

exp(iz) = ei(x+iy) = eix e−y .


Taking the complex conjugate,

exp(iz) = e−ix e−y .

Similarly,
exp(iz) = ei(x−iy) = eix ey .
Thus, the given equation transforms into:

e−ix e−y = eix ey .

Equating the magnitudes:

e−y = ey ⇒ −y = y ⇒ y = 0.

Thus, z must be purely real.

3
Equating the phase components:

e−ix = eix .

This holds if and only if:

−ix = ix + 2πin, n ∈ Z.

Solving for x:
−2ix = 2πin ⇒ x = nπ.
Thus, z must be of the form:

z = nπ, n ∈ Z.

z = nπ, n = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .

∂F
Problem 3(a): Compute ∂ z̄ Using the Chain Rule
Given:

z = x + iy, z̄ = x − iy,

and
z + z̄ z − z̄
x= , y= .
2 2i
Applying the chain rule:
∂F ∂F ∂x ∂F ∂y
= + .
∂ z̄ ∂x ∂ z̄ ∂y ∂ z̄
We compute:
∂x 1 ∂y i
= , = .
∂ z̄ 2 ∂ z̄ 2
Thus,
 
∂F 1 ∂F ∂F
= +i .
∂ z̄ 2 ∂x ∂y

∂f
Problem 3(b): Prove that ∂ z̄ = 0 Using the Cauchy-
Riemann Equations
Define the operator:
 
∂ 1 ∂ ∂
= +i .
∂ z̄ 2 ∂x ∂y

4
Let f (z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y), where u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equa-
tions:
∂u ∂v ∂u ∂v
= , =− .
∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
Applying the operator to f :
   
∂f 1 ∂u ∂v ∂u ∂v
= +i +i +i .
∂ z̄ 2 ∂x ∂x ∂y ∂y

Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations:


∂f 1
= [(vy − vy ) + i(vx + uy )] = 0.
∂ z̄ 2
Thus, we derive:
∂f
= 0.
∂ z̄
This confirms analyticity.
Solution to the Problem on Complex Exponential Equality

You might also like