A Strategic Analysis of Node.

js Frameworks for Enterprise

Applications in 2025
Executive Summary
As the Node.js ecosystem matures, the choice of a backend framework has become a
critical strategic decision, profoundly impacting an application's performance,
security, and long-term total cost of ownership (TCO). This report provides an
exhaustive comparative analysis of NestJS against other leading Node.js
frameworks—namely Express.js, Fastify, and AdonisJS—to guide the selection for a
new, high-performance, secure, and scalable application with a minimum five-year
maintenance horizon.

The primary recommendation of this analysis is the adoption of NestJS, configured

with the Fastify adapter. This combination provides the most strategic and
well-rounded solution for modern enterprise needs. It delivers the structured,
maintainable architecture required for long-term projects and large development
teams, while simultaneously leveraging the raw performance of the fastest underlying
HTTP server available in the Node.js ecosystem. This choice effectively mitigates the
long-term risks associated with unstructured development and ensures the
application is built on a foundation that is both scalable and performant.

The analysis reveals a clear set of trade-offs among the contenders:

●​ Express.js remains the incumbent, offering unparalleled flexibility and the largest
ecosystem. However, its unopinionated nature places the entire burden of
architectural design and discipline on the development team. For long-term,
large-scale projects, this freedom often translates into architectural debt,
inconsistent patterns, and higher maintenance costs, making it a higher-risk
choice for the specified requirements.
●​ Fastify is the undisputed leader in raw performance benchmarks, making it an
exceptional choice for highly specialized, performance-critical microservices
where every microsecond of latency counts. Like Express.js, its minimalist
philosophy means it does not solve the architectural challenges inherent in
building complex applications, leaving this significant task to the developers.
●​ AdonisJS presents itself as a highly cohesive, "batteries-included" framework
that offers a superb developer experience, particularly for teams with a
background in frameworks like Laravel. It is a formidable competitor to NestJS,
providing a similarly structured environment. The principal trade-off is its smaller,
more centralized ecosystem, which poses a potential long-term risk regarding
 third-party package availability, community support, and the diversity of the
talent pool.

Ultimately, the optimal framework is contingent on specific project constraints and

priorities. This report concludes with a detailed decision matrix that maps common
project archetypes to the most suitable framework, providing a clear, actionable guide
for technology leaders. However, for the stated goal of launching a high-performance,
secure, scalable, and cost-effective application designed for a multi-year lifecycle,
NestJS with Fastify offers the most compelling and future-proof solution.

The Node.js Backend Landscape in 2025: Key Trends and

Considerations

The Node.js ecosystem in 2025 is defined by several powerful trends that have
fundamentally shifted how enterprise-grade applications are built. Understanding
these macro-level changes is crucial for making a strategic framework decision that
will remain viable through 2030 and beyond.

The Unstoppable Rise of TypeScript

The debate between dynamic and static typing for server-side JavaScript has
decisively concluded in favor of the latter. TypeScript is no longer an emerging trend
but the established standard for building serious, maintainable backend applications.1
Its adoption has grown consistently over the last decade, with developers and
organizations recognizing its profound benefits for large-scale projects.2

This shift has direct implications for framework selection. Frameworks like NestJS and
AdonisJS are designed as "TypeScript-first" platforms, meaning their entire
architecture, tooling, and documentation are built around leveraging the power of
static types.5 This native integration provides a seamless developer experience and
maximizes the benefits of type safety. Fastify also offers excellent, first-class
TypeScript support, maintaining its own typing files to support the community.8 In
contrast, while TypeScript can certainly be used with Express.js, it requires a manual
setup process, including the installation of type definitions (

@types/express) and configuration of the TypeScript compiler.11

For a project with a five-year maintenance horizon and a goal of low development
cost, a framework's approach to TypeScript is a critical factor. The static analysis
provided by TypeScript catches a significant class of errors at compile time, long
before they reach production, thereby improving code quality and reducing long-term
debugging costs.2 Furthermore, a strongly-typed codebase is easier for new team
members to navigate and understand, simplifying the onboarding process.2 Therefore,
frameworks that treat TypeScript as a core feature inherently reduce the long-term
TCO by absorbing the "architectural tax" of configuration and enforcement, which
must be paid manually in less integrated environments.

The Architectural Divide: Opinionated vs. Unopinionated Frameworks

The most significant philosophical choice within the Node.js ecosystem is between
structured, "opinionated" frameworks and flexible, "unopinionated" ones. This choice
represents a fundamental trade-off between prescribed architecture and developer
freedom.
●​ Unopinionated Frameworks: Express.js is the quintessential unopinionated
framework. It is repeatedly described as "minimalist" and "flexible," providing a
thin layer of functionality over Node.js's core HTTP server.14 Its power lies in its
composability through middleware; an Express application is, at its core, a series
of middleware function calls.16 This grants developers complete control over every
aspect of the application's design. Fastify follows a similar philosophy, offering a
core set of features and a powerful plugin system but not dictating a specific
application structure.8
●​ Opinionated Frameworks: NestJS and AdonisJS stand on the other side of this
divide. They are described as "opinionated," "structured," and
"batteries-included," providing a comprehensive architectural blueprint out of the
box.17 NestJS, inspired by Angular, aims to solve what its creators call the "main
problem of architecture" in the Node.js world by providing a scalable, testable,
and loosely coupled structure based on modules, providers, and controllers.5
AdonisJS, inspired by Laravel, provides a similarly robust MVC structure with a
cohesive set of first-party tools.23
While the freedom of an unopinionated framework is attractive for rapid prototyping
and small projects, this flexibility can become a significant liability in large-scale,
long-term applications.18 The lack of a prescribed structure necessitates constant
architectural decision-making, from folder organization to the choice of libraries for
validation, logging, and database access.25 Across a large or evolving team, this
"decision fatigue" often leads to architectural drift, inconsistent patterns, and a
codebase that is difficult to maintain and scale.28 Developers often find themselves
"reinventing the wheel" to solve common problems.29 Opinionated frameworks
mitigate this risk by providing a battle-tested, consistent structure that allows teams
to focus on business logic rather than foundational plumbing, thereby reducing
cognitive load and lowering long-term maintenance costs.

The Performance Imperative: From Raw RPS to Real-World Latency

Performance remains a paramount concern for modern web applications. The primary
metrics used for comparison are Requests Per Second (RPS) and latency (the time
taken to respond to a request).

Synthetic "Hello, World" benchmarks consistently show a clear performance hierarchy.

Fastify is the undisputed leader, capable of handling significantly more requests per
second than its competitors.30 Express.js, due to its age and less optimized routing,
consistently ranks as the slowest of the major frameworks in these high-concurrency
tests.30

However, it is crucial to recognize that these raw benchmarks measure the overhead
of the HTTP routing layer in isolation. In a real-world application, the framework's
routing performance is rarely the primary bottleneck. More complex benchmarks that
include database queries, authentication (e.g., JWT validation), and other business
logic show that the performance gap between frameworks narrows considerably.34 As
developers in the community frequently note, the database and the efficiency of the
application's own code are far more likely to be the limiting factors for performance.36

This understanding reframes the performance discussion. The critical insight is that a
framework's impact on developer productivity and code quality can indirectly lead to
a more performant overall application. For instance, the structured and testable
architecture of NestJS, with its emphasis on dependency injection and modularity,
encourages developers to write cleaner, more optimized business logic and data
access patterns. Furthermore, NestJS's ability to use Fastify as its underlying HTTP
adapter makes the raw performance debate largely moot.37 This feature allows
developers to benefit from NestJS's superior architecture for maintainability while
simultaneously achieving the best-in-class performance of Fastify, offering a "best of
both worlds" solution.

The Rise of Composable Architectures: Microservices and Serverless

Modern application design is increasingly moving away from pure monolithic

architectures toward more composable systems, including microservices and
serverless functions.1 This trend is driven by the need for improved scalability,
resilience, and independent team velocity. A framework chosen in 2025 must not only
be suitable for the initial application architecture but also support a potential
evolution toward these more distributed patterns over its five-year lifecycle.

NestJS was designed with this architectural evolution in mind. It has first-class, native
support for building microservices, providing abstractions over various transport
layers like TCP, gRPC, Kafka, and RabbitMQ.17 Its core modularity, which encourages
organizing code by feature or domain, directly facilitates the process of breaking a
monolith apart into smaller, independent services. A feature module in a NestJS
monolith can often be refactored into its own microservice with relative ease, as the
patterns of dependency injection and service communication are already
established.17

While any Node.js framework can be used to build microservices, unopinionated

frameworks like Express.js and Fastify provide no specific guidance or tooling for this
architectural style. A team can certainly build a well-structured microservices system
with Express, but the success of this endeavor depends entirely on the discipline and
expertise of the initial architects.28 By choosing a framework like NestJS, an
organization makes a strategic investment in future architectural flexibility, reducing
the cost and risk associated with significant refactoring efforts down the line.

Deep Dive: Framework Profiles

A detailed examination of each framework's core philosophy, architecture, and
specific strengths and weaknesses provides the necessary context for a direct
comparison.

A. NestJS: The Enterprise-Grade All-Rounder

●​ Core Philosophy: NestJS is a progressive Node.js framework designed to bring

structure and established software engineering design patterns to the server-side
JavaScript world. Its primary goal is to solve the "main problem of architecture"
by providing an out-of-the-box foundation for building efficient, highly scalable,
and easily maintainable applications.5 The framework's architecture is heavily
inspired by the modular and dependency-injection-centric design of Angular.41
●​ Architecture: The fundamental building blocks of a NestJS application are
Modules, Providers (Services), and Controllers. It is a TypeScript-first framework
that makes extensive use of decorators (@Module(), @Controller(), @Injectable())
to define the roles and relationships of classes.41 At its heart is a powerful
Inversion of Control (IoC) container that manages dependencies, promoting
loosely coupled and highly testable code.7 NestJS functions as a
meta-framework, abstracting over a standard HTTP server. By default, it uses
Express.js, but it can be seamlessly configured to use Fastify for a significant
performance boost.5
●​ Key Strengths:
○​ Structured Architecture: Its opinionated nature is its greatest strength for
large-scale projects, enforcing a consistent structure that simplifies
maintenance and onboarding.40
○​ Scalability: The modular design and native support for microservice
architectures make it exceptionally well-suited for applications that need to
scale in complexity and traffic.39
○​ First-Class TypeScript: Deep integration with TypeScript enhances code
quality, provides robust type safety, and improves the overall developer
experience.5
○​ Rich Ecosystem: NestJS offers a rich ecosystem of official, well-maintained
modules for common enterprise needs, including GraphQL, WebSockets,
microservices, and OpenAPI (Swagger) documentation generation.45
●​ Potential Weaknesses:
○​ Learning Curve: The framework introduces concepts like Dependency
Injection, decorators, and a modular system that can present a steeper
 learning curve for developers new to these patterns or coming from a simpler
framework like Express.js.17
○​ Boilerplate: For very small, simple applications or microservices, the amount
of boilerplate code required to set up modules, controllers, and services can
feel excessive.17

B. Express.js: The Battle-Tested Minimalist

●​ Core Philosophy: Express.js is designed to be a fast, unopinionated, and

minimalist web framework for Node.js.14 It provides a thin, robust layer of
fundamental web application features without obscuring the core Node.js
functionalities that developers are familiar with. Its power and flexibility stem from
its vast and mature middleware ecosystem.49
●​ Architecture: An Express application is fundamentally a series of middleware
function calls that process an incoming request.16 It provides a powerful routing
system and basic utilities for handling requests and responses. However, all
higher-level architectural decisions—such as folder structure, separation of
concerns (e.g., MVC), and business logic organization—are left entirely to the
developer.50
●​ Key Strengths:
○​ Flexibility: Its unopinionated nature gives developers complete control over
the application's structure and the choice of third-party libraries.18
○​ Low Barrier to Entry: It is extremely simple to learn and get started with,
especially for developers who already know JavaScript and Node.js.52
○​ Massive Ecosystem: As the de facto standard for many years, Express.js has
the largest and most mature ecosystem of third-party middleware and tools,
providing solutions for nearly any requirement.49 According to the 2024 Stack
Overflow Developer Survey, it remains the most-used web technology in its
category.56
●​ Potential Weaknesses:
○​ Lack of Structure: The same flexibility that is a strength for small projects
becomes a significant liability for large, long-term applications. Without strict,
team-enforced conventions, codebases can quickly become inconsistent and
difficult to maintain.28
○​ Manual Security: Security is not built-in; it must be manually implemented by
the developer using various middleware (like Helmet for headers), which can
be overlooked or misconfigured.59
 ○​ Performance: In modern performance benchmarks, Express.js consistently
lags behind newer, more optimized frameworks like Fastify.30

C. Fastify: The Performance Champion

●​ Core Philosophy: Fastify is a web framework highly focused on providing the

best possible developer experience with the least amount of overhead.8 Its
primary design goals are speed and low resource consumption, achieved through
intelligent optimizations like schema-based JSON serialization.
●​ Architecture: The framework is built around a highly optimized router and a
powerful plugin architecture that promotes encapsulation and code reuse.61
Unlike Express middleware, Fastify plugins create encapsulated contexts,
preventing cross-plugin interference. It strongly encourages the use of JSON
Schema for validating request payloads and serializing responses, which it
pre-compiles into highly performant functions at boot time.8
●​ Key Strengths:
○​ Exceptional Performance: Fastify is consistently the fastest of the major
Node.js frameworks in raw RPS benchmarks, often outperforming Express by
a factor of two or more.30 It also boasts a lower memory footprint.63
○​ Excellent Developer Experience: It comes with developer-friendly features
out of the box, such as a high-performance logger (Pino) and built-in,
schema-based validation that improves both performance and code
reliability.8
○​ Extensible and Secure: The robust plugin system allows for clean extension
of functionality, and the ecosystem of security-focused plugins is growing
rapidly.8
●​ Potential Weaknesses:
○​ Smaller Ecosystem: While growing quickly, its ecosystem of plugins and
third-party integrations is smaller and less mature than that of Express.58
○​ Learning Curve: While similar to Express on the surface, mastering its plugin
architecture, lifecycle hooks, and schema-driven approach requires a
dedicated learning effort.61

D. AdonisJS: The Full-Stack Laravel for Node.js

●​ Core Philosophy: AdonisJS is a TypeScript-first, full-stack MVC framework that
prioritizes developer ergonomics, stability, and productivity.14 It is heavily inspired
by the design and developer experience of the PHP framework Laravel, aiming to
provide a cohesive, "batteries-included" ecosystem for Node.js.23
●​ Architecture: The framework is built on the classic Model-View-Controller (MVC)
architectural pattern, providing a clear separation of concerns.20 A key feature of
AdonisJS is its suite of officially maintained, tightly integrated first-party
packages. This includes its own powerful ORM (Lucid), a robust authentication
system, a template engine (Edge), and a validation library (VineJS), among
others.19
●​ Key Strengths:
○​ High Productivity: The integrated, "batteries-included" nature allows
developers to start writing business logic immediately without spending time
configuring and integrating disparate third-party libraries.67
○​ Excellent Developer Experience: The framework is widely praised for its
consistent API, clear conventions, and world-class documentation, making it a
joy to work with, especially for developers coming from similar MVC
backgrounds.67
○​ Strong Security Focus: AdonisJS provides security primitives out of the box,
with its official @adonisjs/shield package offering protection against common
attacks like CSRF and XSS.19
●​ Potential Weaknesses:
○​ Smaller Community and Ecosystem: Compared to giants like Express and
the rapidly growing NestJS, the community and third-party ecosystem for
AdonisJS are smaller. This can mean fewer available packages and potentially
slower community support for niche issues.20
○​ Opinionated and Integrated: The tight integration of its own tools (like the
Lucid ORM) can be seen as restrictive. Teams that prefer to choose their own
libraries for different parts of the stack may find this "vendor lock-in" to be a
disadvantage.20

Comparative Analysis: A Multi-Factor Evaluation

This section directly compares the four frameworks across the critical criteria outlined
in the user query: learning curve, scalability, maintainability, performance, security,
and ecosystem health.

A. Onboarding and Development Velocity: Learning Curve and Developer

Experience (DX)

The ease with which a team can adopt a framework and become productive directly
impacts development costs and timelines.
●​ Express.js: Possesses the lowest learning curve, particularly for developers
already proficient in JavaScript and Node.js.49 Its minimalist API is intuitive and
easy to grasp.53 However, its developer experience is barebones by design; the
developer is responsible for constructing their own DX by selecting and
integrating tools for logging, validation, and configuration. Its documentation is
solid for the core library, but for a complete application, one must consult the
documentation for dozens of separate middleware packages.15
●​ Fastify: The learning curve is also low, comparable to that of Express.js. The
primary additional concepts to learn are its plugin architecture and request
lifecycle hooks.8 The developer experience is a significant improvement over
Express, as it includes a high-performance logger (Pino) and schema-based
validation as core features, which streamlines development and reduces
boilerplate.61 Its official documentation is comprehensive and well-regarded.8
●​ AdonisJS: Presents a steeper learning curve for those new to the Node.js
ecosystem or MVC patterns. However, for developers with experience in
frameworks like Laravel or Ruby on Rails, the transition is remarkably fast and
intuitive.20 The developer experience is a core strength and is highly praised for its
cohesive, integrated nature where all components are designed to work together
seamlessly.67 Its documentation is considered world-class and is often cited as a
key reason for its adoption.19
●​ NestJS: Has the steepest learning curve of the group. It requires developers to
understand more advanced software engineering concepts such as Dependency
Injection (DI), decorators, and its specific modular architecture.17 The initial
experience can be overwhelming for beginners or those coming from simpler
frameworks.47 However, once these concepts are mastered, the developer
experience for building large, complex applications is unparalleled. The powerful
command-line interface (CLI) automates the creation of modules, controllers, and
services, significantly reducing boilerplate and enforcing consistency.45 The
 official documentation is extensive, detailed, and meticulously maintained, serving
as a comprehensive guide for all its features.5

B. Architectural Integrity: Scalability and Long-Term Maintainability

For an application intended to last five years or more, the framework's ability to
support growth in both traffic (scalability) and code complexity (maintainability) is
paramount.
●​ Express.js: The scalability and maintainability of an Express application are not
properties of the framework itself, but rather of the discipline of the team that
builds it. While it is possible to build large, scalable applications with Express, it
requires a strong, self-imposed architectural pattern (like MVC or a layered
architecture) from day one.27 Without this discipline, large projects are at high risk
of degrading into an unmaintainable state, often referred to as "callback hell" or a
"big ball of mud".44
●​ Fastify: Its high performance provides a strong foundation for scalability in terms
of handling traffic. Its plugin architecture, which promotes encapsulation, offers a
better model for modularity than Express middleware, thus aiding
maintainability.61 However, like Express, it does not enforce a high-level application
architecture, leaving that responsibility to the developer.
●​ AdonisJS: Is explicitly designed for building scalable and maintainable
applications.24 Its enforced MVC architecture and consistent syntax provide a
solid structure that keeps the codebase organized and manageable as it grows.68
The "batteries-included" philosophy ensures that core components are designed
to scale together, which reduces the long-term friction of integrating and
maintaining third-party libraries.
●​ NestJS: Excels in both scalability and maintainability, making it the strongest
choice for large, enterprise-grade applications.42 Its core architectural
principles—modularity, separation of concerns, and dependency injection—are
specifically designed to manage complexity and facilitate growth.7 The
framework's native support for microservice patterns provides a clear and
well-supported path for scaling out an application's architecture as business
needs evolve.39 This built-in architectural integrity is a key factor in reducing the
total cost of ownership over the application's lifecycle.
C. Raw Power: Performance Benchmarking

Performance is a critical, non-functional requirement. While real-world performance

depends on many factors, benchmark data provides a valuable baseline for
understanding the overhead and efficiency of each framework's core
request/response pipeline.

The methodology for this analysis synthesizes results from multiple independent
benchmarks, giving greater weight to tests that simulate more realistic workloads
beyond a simple "Hello, World" response.30

Key findings from the analysis are:

●​ Fastify is the performance king. In raw "Hello, World" RPS tests, Fastify
consistently demonstrates the highest throughput, often handling 2 to 4 times
more requests per second than Express.js.30
●​ NestJS (with Fastify) matches Fastify's performance. Crucially, performance
tests comparing raw Fastify to NestJS running with the Fastify adapter show
nearly identical results. This indicates that the architectural abstractions of
NestJS introduce negligible overhead, allowing developers to achieve top-tier
performance without sacrificing structure.34
●​ AdonisJS is highly performant. The official AdonisJS documentation claims its
HTTP server is on par with Fastify, and independent benchmarks confirm it is a
high-performance framework.19 However, in end-to-end application tests
involving database interaction, NestJS (with Fastify) has been shown to have a
slight edge in RPS and lower latency.79
●​ Express.js is the laggard. In all high-concurrency benchmarks, Express.js is
consistently the slowest of the frameworks analyzed.30 While its performance is
often "good enough" for many applications, it is not the optimal choice when
maximum throughput is a primary requirement.

The following table synthesizes data from various benchmarks to provide a

comparative overview.

Framewor Test Type Requests/ Avg. P99 CPU/Mem Source(s)

k (Variant) Sec (RPS) Latency Latency ory Usage
 (ms) (ms)

Fastify Hello ~87,000 Low Low Low 30

World

NestJS Hello ~87,000 Low Low Low 30

(Fastify) World

AdonisJS Hello High Low Low Low 19

World (Compara
ble to
Fastify)

NestJS Hello ~20,000 Higher Higher Higher 30

(Express) World

Express.j Hello ~20,000 Higher Higher Higher 30

s World

Fastify JWT Auth Higher Lower Lower Lower 34

+ DB
Query

NestJS JWT Auth Higher Lower Lower Lower 34

(Fastify) + DB (Similar to (Similar to (Similar to

Query Fastify) Fastify) Fastify)

NestJS JWT Auth Lower Higher Higher Higher 34

(Express) + DB
Query

Express.j JWT Auth Lower Higher Higher Higher 34

s + DB
Query

Note: Absolute RPS numbers vary significantly based on testing hardware and
methodology. The table reflects relative performance tiers observed across multiple
sources.

D. Fortifying the Application: Security Posture and Best Practices

Application security is a shared responsibility between the framework and the
developer. A good framework provides tools and secure defaults that make it easier
for developers to protect against common threats as defined by standards like the
OWASP Top 10.80
●​ Express.js: Security is entirely a manual process. Developers must explicitly add
third-party middleware to address common vulnerabilities. The helmet package is
considered essential for setting secure HTTP headers to protect against attacks
like XSS and clickjacking.59 Similarly, protection against Cross-Site Request
Forgery (CSRF) requires the​
csurf middleware, and rate limiting requires a package like express-rate-limit.60
While the official documentation provides a good guide to these practices, the
onus is on the developer to implement them correctly and consistently.59 The
project maintains a list of security advisories, which often relate to vulnerabilities
in its vast dependency tree.83
●​ Fastify: Adopts a similar plugin-based approach to security. Its ecosystem
includes official and community plugins for key security functions, such as
@fastify/helmet for headers, @fastify/csrf-protection for CSRF, and
@fastify/rate-limit for brute-force protection.86 A key security advantage of Fastify
is its core feature of schema-based validation, which provides a powerful,
declarative first line of defense against injection-style attacks by ensuring that
incoming data conforms to a strict structure.8 The project has a clear security
policy and a limited history of published advisories.89
●​ AdonisJS: Takes a more "batteries-included" approach to security. Its official
@adonisjs/shield package is a core part of the framework and provides
out-of-the-box protection against CSRF, XSS, and content sniffing.72 The
framework also has built-in, first-party solutions for input validation (VineJS) and
secure handling of sessions and file uploads, providing secure defaults from the
start.93 This integrated approach reduces the chances of misconfiguration and
ensures a consistent security posture. AdonisJS has a very strong security track
record with minimal published vulnerabilities.95
●​ NestJS: Leverages the security features of its underlying HTTP server (Express or
Fastify). It recommends using helmet and csurf (or their Fastify equivalents) and
provides clear documentation on how to implement them as global middleware.98
NestJS's primary security strength lies in its architectural patterns. The
framework's heavy reliance on​
class-validator and class-transformer through its built-in ValidationPipe provides
a robust and declarative system for input validation at the controller level. This
 makes it easy to enforce strict data transfer object (DTO) schemas, which is a
highly effective method for preventing injection attacks.100 The NestJS core
framework has no published security advisories on GitHub or Snyk, indicating a
strong security posture.101

The following table provides an at-a-glance comparison of how each framework

addresses key security concerns.

Security NestJS Express.js Fastify AdonisJS

Concern

Secure Via helmet Via helmet Via Built-in via

Headers (XSS, middleware middleware @fastify/helmet @adonisjs/shiel
Clickjacking) plugin d

CSRF Via csurf or Via csurf Via Built-in via

Protection @fastify/csrf-pr middleware @fastify/csrf-pr @adonisjs/shiel
otection otection plugin d

Input Built-in via Via 3rd-party Built-in via Built-in via

Validation ValidationPipe libraries (e.g., JSON Schema VineJS validator
(Injection (class-validator) joi, zod) validation
Prevention)

Rate Limiting Via Via Via Built-in via

(Brute-Force express-rate-lim express-rate-lim @fastify/rate-lim Limiter package
Prevention) it or it middleware it plugin
@fastify/rate-lim
it

Authentication Via 3rd-party Via 3rd-party Via 3rd-party Built-in Auth &
/Authorization libs (e.g., libs (e.g., plugins (e.g., Bouncer
Passport.js) Passport.js) @fastify/passpo packages
rt)

E. Ecosystem Vitality and Future-Proofing

Choosing a framework is also a bet on its community, its ecosystem, and its long-term
viability. A healthy ecosystem ensures continued maintenance, a steady stream of new
features and libraries, and a robust talent pool.
●​ Popularity & Adoption:
○​ Usage Data: The Stack Overflow Developer Survey consistently shows
Node.js as the most-used web technology, with Express.js being the most
popular individual framework within that category by a wide margin.56 NestJS
also shows significant and growing usage, reflecting its adoption in more
structured, enterprise environments.103 While the 2025 survey results are not
yet available, community discussions and prior trends indicate a continued
consolidation around these key players.104
○​ Developer Interest (GitHub Stars): GitHub stars serve as a proxy for
developer interest and approval. NestJS (over 70k stars) and Express.js (over
63k stars) are the clear leaders, indicating strong community backing.43
Fastify has a healthy and growing star count (over 33k), while AdonisJS has a
smaller but highly engaged following (over 18k).6
○​ Package Downloads (npm): Express.js dominates npm download statistics,
but this metric is misleading as a direct measure of active project usage.
Express is a dependency for a vast number of other packages and
frameworks, including NestJS itself, which inflates its numbers.110 A more
nuanced view of the ecosystem is necessary.
●​ Community & Corporate Backing:
○​ Express.js: As a project under the OpenJS Foundation, it has a stable
governance model and a large, mature community. However, its pace of
innovation has historically been slower than its more modern counterparts,
though the recent release of Express 5.0 shows renewed momentum.55
○​ Fastify: A strong, community-driven project with a clear governance structure
and financial support from various organizations. It has an active and
responsive core team.113
○​ AdonisJS: Primarily maintained by its creator, Harminder Virk, and a core
team, funded through GitHub Sponsors. It is used in production by a number
of notable companies, including Marie Claire and Renault Group.78
○​ NestJS: Also funded primarily through community and corporate
sponsorship, NestJS has achieved significant adoption within large
enterprises, including Adidas, Roche, and Société Générale, which signals
strong confidence in its stability and long-term viability.104
●​ Job Market Trends:​
An analysis of the job market provides a clear signal of enterprise technology
adoption. While Node.js developer demand is high across the board, the specific
framework requirements reveal important trends.117 Job postings frequently
 mention "Express.js" due to its historical dominance and its status as a
foundational skill. However, for roles related to large-scale, complex, or
enterprise-level applications, there is a clear and growing demand for developers
with NestJS experience.44 This indicates that companies building the type of
long-lived, maintainable systems that the user query describes are increasingly
standardizing on structured frameworks. While the talent pool for Express.js is
broader, the specialized talent pool for building robust, scalable Node.js
applications is rapidly coalescing around NestJS. This makes NestJS a safer bet
for ensuring the long-term availability of skilled developers.

Strategic Recommendation Framework for 2025-2030

No single framework is the perfect solution for every problem. The optimal choice
depends on the specific priorities and constraints of the project, the team's existing
skill set, and the application's architectural goals. The following decision matrix
synthesizes the preceding analysis to provide clear, actionable recommendations for
various project archetypes.

Project Archetype / Recommended Runner-Up Justification and Key

Priority Framework Considerations

Large-Scale NestJS (with Fastify AdonisJS NestJS's modular

Enterprise adapter) architecture,
Monolith/Microservi dependency
ces (High Scalability injection, and
& Maintainability are first-class
paramount) microservice support
are purpose-built for
managing enterprise
complexity, ensuring
long-term
maintainability and
reducing TCO. The
Fastify adapter
provides elite
performance.
AdonisJS is a strong
alternative with a
cohesive ecosystem
 but has a smaller
talent pool and less
third-party package
diversity.

Performance-Critic Fastify NestJS (with Fastify For applications

al API/Microservice adapter) where raw routing
(Lowest Latency is performance is the
the #1 Priority) absolute most critical
factor (e.g., ad-tech
bidding,
high-frequency
trading gateways),
using raw Fastify
minimizes every
possible source of
overhead. NestJS
with Fastify offers
nearly identical
performance and
should be chosen if
any significant
business logic or
future complexity is
anticipated.

Rapid Prototyping / Express.js AdonisJS Express.js offers the

MVP fastest path from
(Time-to-Market is zero to a running
the #1 Priority) server due to its
simplicity and the
vast number of
tutorials and
examples available.
Its flexibility allows
for quick iteration.
AdonisJS is a close
second, as its
"batteries-included"
nature can accelerate
the development of
features like
authentication and
database interaction.
 Small/Medium Fastify Express.js For a small,
Project with a experienced team
Small, Disciplined that can enforce its
Team own architectural
standards, Fastify
provides a superior
developer experience
and performance
over Express.js
without the perceived
overhead of NestJS.
The choice of
Express.js would be
driven by existing
team familiarity or
the need for a
specific piece of
legacy middleware.

Full-Stack App with AdonisJS NestJS AdonisJS is the

a Laravel/Rails unequivocal choice
Team Background for teams coming
from a PHP/Laravel or
Ruby on Rails
background. Its MVC
structure, ORM
(Lucid), and overall
developer
ergonomics will be
immediately familiar,
leading to extremely
high productivity.
NestJS is a viable but
less direct fit for
these teams.

Conclusion: Synthesizing the Decision for a Future-Proof

Application

The selection of a backend framework is a long-term investment that shapes not only
the initial development velocity but also the application's ability to scale, adapt, and
be maintained efficiently for years to come. For the specific requirements of building a
high-performance, secure, scalable, and maintainable application with a low total cost
of ownership over a five-year lifecycle, the architectural integrity provided by a
structured, opinionated framework is not a luxury but a necessity.

The analysis concludes that the combination of NestJS with the Fastify adapter
represents the most robust, strategic, and future-proof choice for this endeavor. This
recommendation is based on a synthesis of the key findings:
1.​ Architecture for Longevity: NestJS directly addresses the primary challenge of
building complex Node.js applications at scale: architecture. Its enforced
modularity and use of dependency injection provide a solid foundation that
prevents architectural decay, simplifies maintenance, and lowers the long-term
cost of ownership.
2.​ Performance without Compromise: By leveraging the Fastify adapter, a NestJS
application can achieve performance on par with the fastest raw frameworks in
the ecosystem. This nullifies the traditional trade-off between architectural
sophistication and raw speed, offering the best of both worlds.
3.​ Security by Design: The framework's promotion of strong typing and declarative
validation through DTOs provides a powerful, built-in defense against common
injection vulnerabilities, complementing standard security practices like the use
of Helmet.
4.​ Ecosystem and Talent: NestJS has achieved critical mass in enterprise adoption,
ensuring a vibrant ecosystem, continued maintenance, and a growing pool of
skilled developers who are adept at building the very type of large-scale systems
required.

While Express.js laid the foundation for the Node.js revolution and Fastify set a new
benchmark for performance, NestJS provides the comprehensive architectural
solution required for the next generation of enterprise-grade applications. It is the
choice that best mitigates long-term risk and delivers the optimal balance of
structure, performance, and productivity for building a successful, long-lived
application in the modern technology landscape.

Works cited

1.​ 12 NodeJS Development Trends to Follow in 2025 - Coda, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://coda.io/@afnan-shaikh/12-nodejs-development-trends-to-follow-in-2025
2.​ Top JavaScript Future Trends for 2025 - ELITEX Systems, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://elitex.systems/blog/javascript-trends
3.​ Node.js Development Trends for 2025 and Beyond - SolGuruz, accessed July 23,
2025, https://solguruz.com/blog/nodejs-development-trends/
4.​ The 2024 State of JavaScript Survey: Who's Taking the Lead?, accessed July 23,
2025,
https://javascript-conference.com/blog/state-of-javascript-ecosystem-2024/
5.​ Documentation | NestJS - A progressive Node.js framework, accessed July 23,
2025, https://docs.nestjs.com/
6.​ adonisjs/core - GitHub, accessed July 23, 2025, https://github.com/adonisjs/core
7.​ Top 5 Node.js Backend Frameworks in 2024 - Bits and Pieces, accessed July 23,
2025,
https://blog.bitsrc.io/top-5-node-js-backend-frameworks-in-2024-32c7fe9d49c6
8.​ Fastify: Fast and low overhead web framework, for Node.js, accessed July 23,
2025, https://fastify.dev/
9.​ TypeScript - Fastify, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://fastify.dev/docs/v1.14.x/Documentation/TypeScript/
10.​TypeScript | Fastify, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://fastify.dev/docs/latest/Reference/TypeScript/
11.​ How to set up TypeScript with Express - Kinsta®, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://kinsta.com/blog/express-typescript/
12.​How to set up TypeScript with Node.js and Express - DEV Community, accessed
July 23, 2025,
https://dev.to/logrocket/how-to-set-up-typescript-with-nodejs-and-express-3ab
4
13.​How to set up TypeScript with Node.js and Express - LogRocket Blog, accessed
July 23, 2025, https://blog.logrocket.com/express-typescript-node/
14.​Top Node.js Backend Frameworks in 2025 - Flatirons Development, accessed July
23, 2025, https://flatirons.com/blog/top-nodejs-backend-frameworks-2024/
15.​Express - Node.js web application framework, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://expressjs.com/
16.​Using middleware - Express.js, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://expressjs.com/en/guide/using-middleware.html
17.​Recommended api only framework ? Im between nestjs, adonisjs and fastify -
Reddit, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/node/comments/18muy7o/recommended_api_only_fra
mework_im_between_nestjs/
18.​Express.js vs NestJS: Choosing the Right Framework for Your Next Project -
Medium, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@lahiruudayakumara/express-js-vs-nestjs-choosing-the-rig
ht-framework-for-your-next-project-8db7cd5715ab
19.​AdonisJS - A fully featured web framework for Node.js, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://adonisjs.com/
20.​Adonisjs is the future Nodejs framework | by Joe Njenga | Medium, accessed July
23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@joenjenga/adonisjs-is-the-future-nodejs-framework-087e
a06b249e
21.​Documentation | Nest - A progressive Node.js web framework - NestJS,
accessed July 23, 2025, https://docs.nestjs.com/v4/
22.​Documentation | NestJS - A progressive Node.js web framework, accessed July
23, 2025, https://docs.nestjs.com/v5/
23.​The 5 Most Popular Node.js Web Frameworks in 2025 - DEV Community,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://dev.to/leapcell/the-5-most-popular-nodejs-web-frameworks-in-2025-12p
o
24.​Top Adonis.js SaaS Boilerplates 2025, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://boilerplatelist.com/collections/top-adonis-js-saas-boilerplates/
25.​How to Structure my Application in Express.js ? - GeeksforGeeks, accessed July
23, 2025,
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/node-js/how-to-structure-my-application-in-exp
ress-js/
26.​How to build large scale express.js sites - Stack Overflow, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48103637/how-to-build-large-scale-express
-js-sites
27.​Exploring Design Patterns for Express.js Projects: MVC, Modular, and More,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://dev.to/ehtisamhaq/exploring-design-patterns-for-expressjs-projects-mvc-
modular-and-more-37lf
28.​Best Practices for Structuring an Express.js Project - DEV Community, accessed
July 23, 2025,
https://dev.to/moibra/best-practices-for-structuring-an-expressjs-project-148i
29.​NestJS VS AdonisJS - node.js - Stack Overflow, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78000339/nestjs-vs-adonisjs
30.​Node.js: The fastest web framework in 2025 | Tech Tonic - Medium, accessed July
23, 2025,
https://medium.com/deno-the-complete-reference/node-js-the-fastest-web-fra
mework-in-2025-3d13ac5c35b6
31.​Benchmarking Node.js Frameworks: Choose your framework for 2025! | by Louis
Bertson, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@louisbertson/benchmarking-node-js-frameworks-choose-
your-framework-for-2025-4a2fa089dcf3
32.​Express vs NestJS vs Fastify: API Performance Face-Off with 100 Concurrent
Users | by Devang Bhagdev | Jun, 2025 | Medium, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@devang.bhagdev/express-vs-nestjs-vs-fastify-api-perform
ance-face-off-with-100-concurrent-users-22583222810d
33.​Best popular backend frameworks by performance of throughput benchmark
comparison and ranking in 2025 - DEV Community, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://dev.to/tuananhpham/popular-backend-frameworks-performance-bench
mark-1bkh
34.​Performance Testing Express, Fastify, and NestJS (With Express/Fastify) - Scalable
Backend, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://blog.scalablebackend.com/performance-testing-express-fastify-and-nest
 js-with-expressfastify
35.​NestJS Express vs Fastify: Performance comparison for JWT verify and MySQL
query, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/deno-the-complete-reference/nestjs-express-vs-fastify-per
formance-comparison-for-jwt-verify-and-mysql-query-d94637bc8a3e
36.​Express vs Fastify : r/Nestjs_framework - Reddit, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/Nestjs_framework/comments/1droehw/express_vs_fasti
fy/
37.​Performance (Fastify) | NestJS - A progressive Node.js framework, accessed July
23, 2025, https://docs.nestjs.com/techniques/performance
38.​The Latest Trends and Development in Node.JS (2025 Edition) - Kommunicate,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.kommunicate.io/blog/the-latest-trends-and-development-in-node-j
s/
39.​Microservices | NestJS - A progressive Node.js framework, accessed July 23,
2025, https://docs.nestjs.com/microservices/basics
40.​A C-suite guide to mastering modular architecture in NestJS applications - Dev
and Deliver, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://devanddeliver.com/blog/backend/level-up-your-backend-a-c-suite-guide
-to-mastering-modular-architecture-in-nest-js-applications
41.​NestJS: Building Scalable and Maintainable Server-Side Applications with
TypeScript, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://curatepartners.com/blogs/skills-tools-platforms/nestjs-building-scalable-a
nd-maintainable-server-side-applications-with-typescript/
42.​Master NestJS: Best Practices for Scalable Code - Delving Developer, accessed
July 23, 2025,
https://delvingdeveloper.com/posts/nestjs-best-practices-maintainable-scalable-
code
43.​NestJS vs. Express.js - LogRocket Blog, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://blog.logrocket.com/nestjs-vs-express-js/
44.​Top 9 Best Node.js Frameworks For Web App Development - Relia Software,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://reliasoftware.com/blog/leading-node-js-frameworks-for-web-application
-development
45.​The NestJS Handbook – Learn to Use Nest with Code Examples -
freeCodeCamp, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/the-nestjs-handbook-learn-to-use-nest-wi
th-code-examples/
46.​Nest.js Essentials: Community and Ecosystem — Part 21/22 | by Stephen Klop |
Medium, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@s.klop/nest-js-essentials-community-and-ecosystem-part
-21-22-b23b94658353
47.​From Express to NestJS: Navigating the Learning Curve | by Habibafaisal -
Medium, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@habibafaisal8/from-express-to-nestjs-navigating-the-learn
 ing-curve-747f5c601877
48.​Nestjs vs ExpressJS : r/node - Reddit, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/node/comments/1gnauyi/nestjs_vs_expressjs/
49.​Building an app? These are the best JavaScript frameworks in 2025 - Contentful,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.contentful.com/blog/best-javascript-frameworks/
50.​Express/Node introduction - Learn web development | MDN, accessed July 23,
2025,
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn_web_development/Extensions/Se
rver-side/Express_Nodejs/Introduction
51.​Comparing NestJS & Express.js: Which Framework is the Best - Jelvix, accessed
July 23, 2025, https://jelvix.com/blog/nestjs-vs-express
52.​ExpressJS Tutorial: The Ultimate Guide (2023) - Mastering Backend, accessed July
23, 2025,
https://masteringbackend.com/posts/expressjs-5-tutorial-the-ultimate-guide
53.​Unveiling the Learning Curve of Node.js: Is It Difficult to Learn? | by Michael /
slashdev.io, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@michael.slashventures/unveiling-the-learning-curve-of-no
de-js-is-it-difficult-to-learn-9be60b890b7a
54.​Express.js Explained: What it is and How to Use it in Your JavaScript Project |
Codecademy, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.codecademy.com/article/what-is-express-js
55.​Community - Express.js, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://expressjs.com/en/resources/community.html
56.​Tech salaries: Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2024 – USA - techrecruiting.io,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://techrecruiting.io/en/stack-overflow-developer-survey-2024-2/
57.​Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2024 key highlights | by Abhishek Raina |
Medium, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@rahulraina346/stack-overflow-developer-survey-2024-key
-highlights-4d0065178e43
58.​Express vs Koa vs Fastify vs NestJS vs Hono: Choosing the Right Node.js
Framework, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@khanshahid9283/express-vs-koa-vs-fastify-vs-nestjs-vs-h
ono-choosing-the-right-node-js-framework-17a56a533d29
59.​Security Best Practices for Express in Production - Express.js, accessed July 23,
2025, https://expressjs.com/en/advanced/best-practice-security.html
60.​What Are the Best Practices for Securing Express.js Applications in Production?,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://arunangshudas.medium.com/what-are-the-best-practices-for-securing-e
xpress-js-applications-in-production-a8cff9955860
61.​Fastify In-Depth: Speed, Performance, and Scalability Node.js Web Framework |
by Leapcell, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://leapcell.medium.com/fastify-in-depth-speed-performance-and-scalabilit
y-node-js-web-framework-22cfc308791f
62.​Plugins | Fastify, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://fastify.dev/docs/latest/Reference/Plugins/
63.​nestjs vs fastify in 2024 - Medium, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@tkssharma/nestjs-vs-fastify-in-2024-baa1e183a1de
64.​Ecosystem | Fastify, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://fastify.io/docs/v2.15.x/Documentation/Ecosystem/
65.​Express or Fastiy : r/node - Reddit, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/node/comments/r7528m/express_or_fastiy/
66.​Fastify - a lightning-fast Node.js plugin explained - Apptension, accessed July 23,
2025, https://www.apptension.com/blog-posts/what-is-fastify
67.​NestJs vs Adonis in 2023 : r/node - Reddit, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/node/comments/12ppnqz/nestjs_vs_adonis_in_2023/
68.​AdonisJS: A Fully Featured Web Framework for Node.js | by Rizky Kurniawan |
DOT Blog, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://blog.dot.co.id/adonisjs-a-fully-featured-web-framework-for-node-js-a99
a6250d5db
69.​An Introduction to AdonisJS - Medium, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/deemaze-software/an-introduction-to-adonisjs-a7622df3e8
1f
70.​Thinking of learning Adonis or Laravel (how do the two compare in 2025)? :
r/adonisjs, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/adonisjs/comments/1hxj1xw/thinking_of_learning_adonis
_or_laravel_how_do_the/
71.​Why is this Framework not the standard for BE development : r/node - Reddit,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/node/comments/18z730f/why_is_this_framework_not_th
e_standard_for_be/
72.​@adonisjs/shield - npm, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.npmjs.com/package/@adonisjs/shield
73.​Express.js Tutorial - GeeksforGeeks, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/node-js/express-js/
74.​Express vs NestJS vs Fastify: API Performance Face-Off with 100 Concurrent
Users, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@abdooy640/express-vs-nestjs-vs-fastify-api-performance
-face-off-with-100-concurrent-users-608b92aca863
75.​Any experience in Adonisjs? : r/laravel - Reddit, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/laravel/comments/g5cmq1/any_experience_in_adonisjs/
76.​NestJS: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly | by Robert-Jan Kuyper | Better
Programming, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://betterprogramming.pub/nestjs-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-d51aea0
4f267
77.​Fastify In-Depth: Speed, Performance, and Scalability Node.js Web Framework,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://dev.to/leapcell/fastify-in-depth-speed-performance-and-scalability-nodej
s-web-framework-lfb
78.​FAQs (Preface) - AdonisJS Documentation, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://docs.adonisjs.com/guides/preface/faqs
79.​Node JS NestJS vs AdonisJS Performance Benchmark Comparison - YouTube,
accessed July 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dCeUaKzF5U
80.​OWASP Top Ten, accessed July 23, 2025, https://nest.owasp.org/projects/top-ten
81.​OWASP Top Ten, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/
82.​helmetjs/helmet: Help secure Express apps with various HTTP headers - GitHub,
accessed July 23, 2025, https://github.com/helmetjs/helmet
83.​Security updates - Express.js, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://expressjs.com/en/advanced/security-updates.html
84.​Security Best Practices for Express in Production, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://expressjs.com/th/advanced/best-practice-security.html
85.​cve-2024-29041 - NVD, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2024-29041
86.​Core Plugins - Fastify, accessed July 23, 2025, https://fastify.dev/ecosystem/
87.​fastify-helmet - Yarn, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://classic.yarnpkg.com/en/package/fastify-helmet
88.​fastify/csrf-protection - GitHub, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://github.com/fastify/csrf-protection
89.​Security Advisories · fastify/fastify - GitHub, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://github.com/fastify/fastify/security/advisories
90.​Fastify Vulnerabilities, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://securityvulnerability.io/vendor/fastify/fastify
91.​Web security - Introduction | AdonisJS 5 Documentation, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://v5-docs.adonisjs.com/guides/security/web-security
92.​shield - AdonisJS Packages, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://packages.adonisjs.com/packages/shield
93.​Introduction - AdonisJs, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://legacy.adonisjs.com/docs/3.2/security-introduction
94.​Introduction - AdonisJs, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://legacy.adonisjs.com/docs/4.0/security-introduction
95.​@adonisjs/core vulnerabilities | Snyk, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://security.snyk.io/package/npm/%40adonisjs%2Fcore
96.​Adonisjs : Products and vulnerabilities, CVEs, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/25523/Adonisjs.html
97.​Adonisjs CVEs and Security Vulnerabilities - OpenCVE, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.opencve.io/cve?vendor=adonisjs
98.​Security - Documentation | NestJS - A progressive Node.js framework - Netlify,
accessed July 23, 2025, https://ru-nestjs-docs.netlify.app/techniques/security
99.​CSRF | NestJS - A progressive Node.js framework, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://docs.nestjs.com/security/csrf
100.​ Securing NestJS Apps: Implementing Key OWASP Protections | by Febrian Dwi
Kimhan, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://medium.com/@febriandwikimhan/securing-nestjs-apps-implementing-ke
 y-owasp-protections-8ef60df6ecf8
101.​ Security Advisories · nestjs/nest - GitHub, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://github.com/nestjs/nest/security/advisories
102.​ @nestjs/core vulnerabilities | Snyk, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://security.snyk.io/package/npm/%40nestjs%2Fcore
103.​ NestJS vs. Express.js: Choosing the Best Node Framework for 2025 - Flatirons
Development, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://flatirons.com/blog/nestjs-vs-express/
104.​ Top JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2025 - DEV Community, accessed July
23, 2025,
https://dev.to/eva_clari_289d85ecc68da48/top-javascript-frameworks-to-use-in-
2025-2g9i
105.​ 2025 Developer Survey: Call for Feedback [duplicate] - Meta Stack Overflow,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/433720/2025-developer-survey-call-f
or-feedback
106.​ The 2025 Developer Survey from Stack Overflow is available! : r/neovim -
Reddit, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/neovim/comments/1kykrzw/the_2025_developer_survey
_from_stack_overflow_is/
107.​ The 2025 Developer Survey is Now Live - Meta Stack Overflow, accessed July
23, 2025,
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/434080/the-2025-developer-survey-i
s-now-live
108.​ Our predictions for the 2025 StackOverflow Developer Survey results -
Framework Training, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://www.frameworktraining.co.uk/news-insights/our-predictions-2025-stacko
verflow-developer-survey-results/
109.​ nest/CONTRIBUTING.md at master · nestjs/nest - GitHub, accessed July 23,
2025, https://github.com/nestjs/nest/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
110.​ Compare download trends for npm packages - npmcharts, accessed July 23,
2025,
https://www.npmcharts.com/compare/express,koa,nest,@adonisjs/framework,co
nnect,@nestjs/core,fastify,hapi,loopback?minimal=true
111.​ Top Node.js Frameworks to use in 2022 | by Ronak Patel | JavaScript in Plain
English, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://javascript.plainenglish.io/top-node-js-frameworks-to-use-in-2021-4951ee
5940b8
112.​ A New Chapter for Express.js: Triumphs of 2024 and an ambitious 2025,
accessed July 23, 2025,
https://expressjs.com/2025/01/09/rewind-2024-triumphs-and-2025-vision.html
113.​ fastify/fastify: Fast and low overhead web framework, for Node.js - GitHub,
accessed July 23, 2025, https://github.com/fastify/fastify
114.​ Organizations using Fastify, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://fastify.io/organizations/
115.​ Discover - Who is using Nest? | NestJS - A progressive Node.js framework,
accessed July 23, 2025, https://docs.nestjs.com/discover/companies
116.​ Support | NestJS - A progressive Node.js framework, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://docs.nestjs.com/support
117.​ NodeJS Developer Demand 2025: Salaries & Hiring Guide - Bitbyhost,
accessed July 23, 2025, https://bitbyhost.com/nodejs-developer-demand-2025/
118.​ Top 10 Powerful Express JS Alternatives for Modern Web Development in
2025 - SolGuruz, accessed July 23, 2025,
https://solguruz.com/blog/top-expressjs-alternatives/