Intermidate Financial Accounting Chapter Two
Intermidate Financial Accounting Chapter Two
Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the formal procedures associated with issuing long-term debt.
2. Identify various types of bond issues.
3. Describe the accounting valuation for bonds at date of issuance.
4. Apply the methods of bond discount and premium amortization.
5. Explain the accounting for long-term notes payable.
6. Describe the accounting for the extinguishment of non-current liabilities.
7. Describe the accounting for the fair value option.
8. Explain the reporting of off-balance-sheet financing arrangements.
9. Indicate how to present and analyze non-current liabilities.
2.1Nature of long-term debt
Non-current liability (Long-term debt) consists of probable future sacrifices of economic
benefits arising from present obligations that are not payable within a year or the operating cycle
of the company, whichever is longer. Bonds payable, long-term notes payable, mortgages
payable, pension liabilities, and lease liabilities are examples of long term liabilities.
A corporation, per its bylaws, usually requires approval by the board of directors and the
stockholders before bonds or notes can be issued. The same holds true for other types of long-
term debt arrangements.
Generally, long-term debt has various covenants or restrictions that protect both lenders and
borrowers. The indenture or agreement often includes the amounts authorized to be issued,
interest rate, due date(s), call provisions, property pledged as security, sinking fund
requirements, working capital and dividend restrictions, and limitations concerning the
assumption of additional debt. Companies should describe these features in the body of the
financial statements or the notes if important for a complete understanding of the financial
position and the results of operations.
Although it would seem that these covenants provide adequate protection to the long-term debt
holder, many bondholders suffer considerable losses when companies add more debt to the
capital structure. Such a loss in value occurs because the additional debt added to the capital
structure increases the likelihood of default. Although covenants protect bondholders, they can
still suffer losses when debt levels get too high.
How do you calculate the amount of interest that is actually paid to the bondholder each period?
(Stated rate x Face Value of the bond)
2
How do you calculate the amount of interest that is actually recorded as interest expense by the
issuer of the bonds?
(Market rate x Carrying Value of the bond)
Assume Stated Rate of 8%
If market interest is 6% bonds sold at premium, market interest is 8% bonds sold at discount and
market interest is 10% bonds sold at discount.
Bonds Issued at Par
Illustration: Santos Company issues $100,000 in bonds dated January 1, 2011, due in five years
with 9 percent interest payable annually on January 1. At the time of issue, the market rate for
such bonds is 9 percent.
3
Journal entry on date of issue, Jan. 1, 2011.
Cash 92,608
Bonds payable 92,608
Journal entry to record accrued interest at Dec. 31, 2011.
Bond interest expense 10,187
Bond interest payable 9,000
Bonds payable 1,187
Journal entry to record first payment on Jan. 1, 2012.
Bond interest payable 9,000
Cash 9,000
When bonds sell at less than face value:
► Investors demand a rate of interest higher than stated rate.
► Usually occurs because investors can earn a higher rate on alternative
investments of equal risk.
► Cannot change stated rate so investors refuse to pay face value for the bonds.
► Investors receive interest at the stated rate computed on the face value, but they
actually earn at an effective rate because they paid less than face value for the
bonds.
2.3 Accounting for term bonds
Effective-Interest Method of Amortization of term bond
Bond issued at a discount - amount paid at maturity is more than the issue amount.
Bonds issued at a premium - company pays less at maturity relative to the issue price.
Adjustment to the cost is recorded as bond interest expense over the life of the bonds through a
process called amortization.
Required procedure for amortization is the effective-interest method (also called present value
amortization).
Effective-interest method produces a periodic interest expense equal to a constant percentage
of the carrying value of the bonds.
4
Journal entry on date of issue, Jan. 1, 2011.
Cash 92,278
Bonds payable 92,278
Journal entry to record first payment and amortization of the discount on July 1, 2011.
Bond interest expense 4,614
Bonds payable 614
Cash 4,000
Journal entry to record accrued interest and amortization of the discount on Dec. 31, 2011
Bond interest expense 4,645
Bond interest payable 4,000
Bonds payable 645
Bonds Issued at a Premium
Illustration: Evermaster Corporation issued $100,000 of 8% term bonds on January 1, 2011,
due on January 1, 2016, with interest payable each July 1 and January 1. Investors require an
effective-interest rate of 6%. Calculate the bond proceeds.
5
Journal entry on date of issue, Jan. 1, 2011.
Cash 108,530
Bonds payable 108,530
Journal entry to record first payment and amortization of the premium on July 1, 2011.
Bond interest expense 3,256
Bonds payable 744
Cash 4,000
Accrued Interest
What happens if Evermaster prepares financial statements at the end of February 2011? In this
case, the company prorates the premium by the appropriate number of months to arrive at the
proper interest expense, as follows.
Cash 100,000
Bonds payable 100,000
Cash 2,667
Bond interest expense 2,667
6
Bonds Issued at Par
On July 1, 2011, two months after the date of purchase, Evermaster pays the investors six
months’ interest, by making the following entry. ($100,000 x .08 x 1/2) = $4,000
Bond interest expense 4,000
Cash 4,000
The premium amortization of the bonds is also for only two months
Evermaster therefore makes the following entries on July 1, 2011, to record the interest payment and
the premium amortization.
8
1. Proceeds under case 1
Interest due
(10% Total Discounting
End of principal left) Principal due amount factor (9%) Present
due value
2003 Br. 50,000 Br. 50,000 Br.100,000 0.917 Br. 91,700
2004 45,000 50,000 95,000 0.842 79,990
2005 40,000 50,000 90,000 0.772 69,480
2006 35,000 50,000 85,000 0.708 60,180
2007 30,000 50,000 80,000 0.650 52,000
2008 25,000 50,000 75,000 0.596 44,700
2009 20,000 50,000 70,000 0.547 38,290
2010 15,000 50,000 65,000 0.502 32,630
2011 10,000 50,000 60,000 0.460 27,600
2012 5,000 50,000 55,000 0.422 23,210
Totals Br. 275,000 Br. 500,000 Br.775,000 Br. 519,780
Proceeds = Br. 519,780
2. Amount of bond premium at the time of issuance, case 1
Total proceeds Br. 519,780
Face value 500,000
Premium Br. 19,780
3. Proceeds under case 2
9
Cash 481,380
Discount on bonds payable 18,620
Bonds payable 500,000
7 Premium amortization table (interest method)
Year Interest Interest Premium Bond Principal Carrying amount
(A) Payment expense Amortization Premium Balance (G)= (E)+(F)
(B)= 10%*(F) (C)=9%*(G) (D)= (B)-(C) Balance (F)
(E)= (E)-(D)
Issue - - - Br. 19,780 500,000 Br. 519,780
2003 Br. 50,000 Br. 46,780 Br. 3,220 16,560 450,000 466,560
2004 45,000 41,990 3,010 13,550 400,000 413,550
2005 40,000 37,220 2,780 10,770 350,000 360,770
2006 35,000 32,469 2,531 8,239 300,000 308,239
2007 30,000 27,742 2,258 5,981 250,000 255,981
2008 25,000 23,038 1,962 4,019 200,000 204,019
2009 20,000 18,362 1,638 2,381 150,000 152,381
2010 15,000 13,714 1,286 1,095 100,000 101,095
2011 10,000 9,099 901 194* 50,000 50,194
2012 5000 4,517 483* - - -
* Rounding up difference
9. Premium amortization table using bond outstanding method
Bonds Fraction of Premium
Year outstanding total of bonds amortization (Br. Interest Payment Interest
balance outstanding 19,780 x fraction) expense
2003 Br. 500,000 50 /275 Br. 3,596 Br. 50,000 Br. 46,404
2004 450,000 45 /275 3.237 45,000 41,763
2005 400.000 40 /275 2,878 40,000 37,122
2006 350,000 35 /275 2.517 35,000 32,483
2007 300,000 30 /275 2,158 30,000 27,842
2008 250,000 25 /275 1,798 25,000 23,202
2009 200,000 20 /275 1,439 20,000 18,561
2010 150,000 15 /275 1,079 15,000 13,921
2011 100,000 10 /275 719 10,000 9,281
2012 50,000 5 /275 360 5,000 4,640
Br. 2,750,000 2750 /2.750 Br. 19,780 Br. 275,000 Br. 255,220
10
Year Interest Interest Discount Bond Principal Carrying
(A) Payment(B) expense amortization( discount Balance amount(G)=
(11%)(C) D)= (B)-(C) Balance(E) (F) (F)- (E)
Reading assignment: Straight- Line Method of Amortization of serial and term bonds
2.5 Long-Term Notes Payable
Accounting treatment for long term notes payable is Similar to Bonds
A note is valued at the present value of its future interest and principal cash flows.
Company amortizes any discount or premium over the life of the note.
Notes Issued at Face Value
Illustration: Coldwell, Inc. issued a $100,000, 4-year, 10% note at face value to Flint Hills
Bank on January 1, 2011, and received $100,000 cash. The note requires annual interest
payments each December 31. Prepare Coldwell’s journal entries to record (a) the issuance of the
note and (b) the December 31 interest payment.
(a) Cash 100,000
Notes payable 100,000
(b) Interest expense 10,000
Cash 10,000
($100,000 x 10% = $10,000)
Zero-Interest-Bearing Notes
Issuing company records the difference between the face amount and the present value (cash
received) as
a discount and
amortizes that amount to interest expense over the life of the note.
Illustration: Samson Corporation issued a 4-year, $75,000, zero-interest-bearing note to Brown
Company on January 1, 2011, and received cash of $47,663. The implicit interest rate is 12%.
Prepare Samson’s journal entries for (a) the Jan. 1 issuance and (b) the Dec. 31 recognition of
interest.
13
Wunderlich records issuance of the note on Dec. 31, 2011, in payment for the architectural
services as follows.
Building (or Construction in Process) 418,239
Notes Payable 418,239
Wunderlich records Payment of first year’s interest and amortization of the discount as follows:
Interest expense 33,459
Notes Payable 22,459
Cash 11,000
Mortgage Notes Payable
A promissory note secured by a document called a mortgage that pledges title to property as
security for the loan.
Most common form of long-term notes payable.
Payable in full at maturity or in installments.
Fixed-rate mortgage.
Variable-rate mortgages.
2.6 Extinguishment of Non-Current Liabilities
Extinguishment with Cash before Maturity
Reacquisition price > Net carrying amount = Loss
Net carrying amount > Reacquisition price = Gain
At time of reacquisition, unamortized premium or discount must be amortized up
to the reacquisition date.
14
Extinguishment of Debt
Illustration: Evermaster bonds issued at a discount on January 1, 2011. These bonds are due in
five years. The bonds have a par value of $100,000, a coupon rate of 8% paid semiannually, and
were sold to yield 10%.
Two years after the issue date on January 1, 2013, Evermaster calls the entire issue at 101 and
cancels it.
The gain on the modification is $3,298,664, which is the difference between the prior carrying value
($10,500,000) and the fair value of the restructured note, as computed in Illustration above
($7,201,336). Resorts Development makes the following entry to record the modification.
16
Off-Balance-Sheet Financing
Off-balance-sheet financing is an attempt to borrow monies in such a way to prevent recording
the obligations.
Different Forms:
Off-balance-sheet financing can take many different forms:
a. Non-consolidated subsidiary. A parent company does not have to consolidate a subsidiary
company that is less than 50 percent owned. In such cases, the parent therefore does not
report the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary. All the parent reports on its balance sheet
are the investment in the subsidiary. As a result, users of the financial statements may not
understand that the subsidiary has considerable debt for which the parent may ultimately be
liable if the subsidiary runs into financial difficulty.
b. Special-purpose entity (SPE). A company creates a special-purpose entity (SPE) to perform
a special project. To illustrate, assume that Clarke Company decides to build a new factory.
However, management does not want to report the plant or the borrowing used to fund the
construction on its balance sheet. It therefore creates an SPE, the purpose of which is to
build the plant. (This arrangement is called a project financing arrangement.) The SPE
finances and builds the plant. In return, Clarke guarantees that it or some outside party will
purchase all the products produced by the plant. (Some refer to this as a take-or-pay
contract.) As a result, Clarke might not report the asset or liability on its books. The
accounting rules in this area are complex.
c. Operating leases. Another way that companies keep debt off the balance sheet is by leasing.
Instead of owning the assets, companies lease them. Again, by meeting certain conditions,
the company has to report only rent expense each period and to provide note disclosure of
the transaction. Note that SPEs often use leases to accomplish off-balance sheet treatment.
Rationale
Why do companies engage in off-balance-sheet financing? A major reason is that many believe
that removing debt enhances the quality of the balance sheet and permits credit to be obtained
more readily and at less cost.
Second, loan covenants often limit the amount of debt a company may have. As a result, the
company uses off-balance-sheet financing because these types of commitments might not be
considered in computing the debt limitation.
Third, some argue that the asset side of the balance sheet is severely understated. For example,
companies that use LIFO costing for inventories and depreciate assets on an accelerated basis
will often have carrying amounts for inventories and property, plant, and equipment that are
much lower than their fair values. As an offset to these lower values, some believe that part of
the debt does not have to be reported. In other words, if companies report assets at fair values,
less pressure would undoubtedly exist for off-balance-sheet financing arrangements.
Whether the arguments above have merit is debatable. The general idea of “out of sight, out of
mind” may not be true in accounting. Many users of financial statements indicate that they factor
these off-balance-sheet financing arrangements into their computations when assessing debt-to-
equity relationships. Similarly, many loan covenants also attempt to account for these complex
17
arrangements. Nevertheless, many companies still believe that benefits will accrue if they omit
certain obligations from the balance sheet.
18