2146-Article Text-5440-6449-10-20240801
2146-Article Text-5440-6449-10-20240801
1*Omar Ibrahim
University of Dodoma
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to explore the impact of cloud computing on business continuity and
disaster recovery.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary
data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting
data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field
research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the
study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily
accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to cloud
computing on business continuity and disaster recovery. Preliminary empirical review revealed that
cloud computing significantly enhanced organizational resilience and recovery capabilities by
providing scalable, flexible, and cost-efficient solutions. It highlighted that while cloud-based
solutions reduced recovery times and minimized operational downtime, organizations needed to
address challenges related to data security, regulatory compliance, and integration with existing
systems. The effectiveness of these solutions varied depending on factors such as cloud deployment
type and organizational needs. Overall, the study affirmed that cloud computing offered substantial
benefits for disaster recovery but required a thoughtful approach to integration and management.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Resource-Based View (RBV) Theory,
Contingency Theory and Dynamic Capabilities Theory may be used to anchor future studies on cloud
computing on business continuity and disaster recovery. The study recommended that organizations
develop tailored cloud-based disaster recovery solutions aligned with their specific needs and risk
profiles. It advocated for the creation of industry-specific guidelines and standards to address
challenges such as data sovereignty and vendor lock-in, and for policymakers to streamline regulatory
requirements. The study also suggested that organizations adopt a phased approach to cloud
implementation, conduct thorough risk assessments, and establish robust management practices.
Future research was encouraged to explore the long-term impacts of cloud computing on disaster
recovery and to investigate the role of emerging technologies in enhancing cloud-based solutions.
Keywords: Cloud Computing, Business Continuity, Disaster Recovery, Scalability, Data Security
16
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Business continuity (BC) and disaster recovery (DR) are vital components of organizational resilience,
designed to ensure that critical functions continue during and after a disruption, and to restore
operations to normal as swiftly as possible. Business continuity involves proactive planning to
maintain and quickly resume operations despite disruptions, while disaster recovery focuses on
restoring normal operations after a disaster occurs. Effective BC and DR strategies are essential in
today's increasingly complex and interconnected world, where organizations face a multitude of threats
including natural disasters, cyber-attacks, and other unforeseen events. According to Smith and
Veenema (2016), BC and DR planning involves a detailed risk assessment, development of a
comprehensive response plan, and regular testing to ensure that the strategies remain effective under
various scenarios. The importance of these strategies is underscored by the fact that businesses that
fail to prepare adequately can face significant operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational
damage.
In the USA, business continuity practices are well-advanced, driven by the need to protect against a
wide range of disruptions from natural disasters to technological failures. According to FEMA,
approximately 40% of businesses that experience a major disruption do not reopen, highlighting the
critical need for robust BC and DR strategies (FEMA, 2020). Large corporations like IBM and
Microsoft have developed comprehensive BC plans, leveraging their extensive data centers and cloud
infrastructure to ensure that operations remain unaffected by localized issues. For instance, IBM’s
global network of data centers is designed to provide uninterrupted service by automatically rerouting
traffic in the event of a data center failure. Additionally, Microsoft’s Azure platform offers disaster
recovery services that include automated backup and rapid restoration capabilities. These examples
reflect a broader trend in the USA, where organizations are investing heavily in BC and DR to mitigate
the risk of downtime and maintain operational stability in the face of evolving threats.
In the United Kingdom, the importance of business continuity and disaster recovery has been
highlighted by various high-profile incidents. The 2017 Manchester Arena bombing, for example,
demonstrated the need for robust BC and DR plans in the face of unexpected emergencies (Hargreaves
& Scullion, 2018). The UK’s National Risk Register emphasizes the necessity for businesses to
develop resilience strategies to cope with various risks, including terrorist attacks, natural disasters,
and pandemics. British multinational companies such as BT Group have implemented sophisticated
BC frameworks to address these risks. BT Group’s BC plan includes provisions for maintaining service
continuity during emergencies, including alternative communication channels and backup systems.
The UK’s emphasis on BC and DR is also reflected in regulatory requirements, which mandate that
organizations develop and test BC plans to ensure they can effectively respond to crises and minimize
operational disruptions.
Japan’s approach to business continuity and disaster recovery is influenced by its frequent exposure to
natural disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis. The 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, one of
the most devastating natural disasters in recent history, highlighted the need for resilient BC and DR
strategies (Kinoshita, 2017). Japanese companies, particularly those in the manufacturing sector, have
developed advanced DR plans to mitigate the impact of such events. For instance, Toyota has
implemented a multi-tiered DR strategy that includes establishing alternative production facilities and
diversifying its supply chain to minimize disruptions. According to a report by the Japan
Meteorological Agency (JMA), the Tōhoku disaster led to a significant increase in BC and DR
investments across various sectors, with organizations focusing on improving infrastructure resilience
and emergency response capabilities (JMA, 2019). This proactive approach has helped Japanese
businesses recover more swiftly from disruptions and enhance their overall resilience.
17
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
In Brazil, the focus on business continuity and disaster recovery has intensified in response to both
economic and environmental challenges. The 2019 Brumadinho dam collapse, which resulted in
significant loss of life and environmental damage, underscored the need for effective BC and DR
measures in the mining industry (Silva & Costa, 2020). Brazilian companies are increasingly adopting
BC frameworks to address risks associated with environmental disasters, political instability, and
economic volatility. For example, Vale, one of the largest mining companies in Brazil, has
implemented a comprehensive BC and DR strategy that includes risk assessments, emergency response
plans, and recovery procedures. Additionally, the Brazilian government has introduced regulations
aimed at enhancing disaster preparedness and recovery capabilities across various sectors (Pereira,
2021). These measures reflect a growing recognition of the importance of BC and DR in mitigating
the impact of disruptions and ensuring organizational resilience.
In African countries, the development of business continuity and disaster recovery practices is
progressing, with increasing emphasis on resilience amid diverse challenges. For instance, in South
Africa, the financial sector has adopted BC and DR measures to address risks from power outages,
economic instability, and other disruptions (Mkhize & Nair, 2021). Organizations such as Standard
Bank have implemented BC plans that include backup power systems and alternative communication
channels to ensure continuity during outages. In Nigeria, businesses are focusing on BC strategies to
cope with disruptions from political instability, infrastructural deficits, and other challenges. The
African Union has also been working to promote BC and DR frameworks across member states, with
initiatives aimed at enhancing regional stability and resilience (African Union, 2022). These efforts
reflect a growing awareness of the importance of BC and DR in managing risks and ensuring business
continuity in diverse African contexts.
Globally, there is a noticeable trend towards integrating technology into business continuity and
disaster recovery strategies. Cloud computing, in particular, has become a critical component in
modern DR plans, offering scalable and flexible solutions for data backup and recovery (Jones &
Williams, 2019). According to a 2023 report by Gartner, approximately 70% of organizations have
incorporated cloud-based solutions into their BC and DR strategies, reflecting a significant shift
towards technology-driven resilience (Gartner, 2023). Cloud computing provides advantages such as
automatic data backup, rapid recovery capabilities, and cost-effective solutions for managing disaster
recovery. This trend highlights the increasing reliance on technology to enhance organizational
resilience and ensure continuity in the face of various disruptions.
The economic impact of business continuity failures can be substantial, with significant financial
losses and reputational damage. A study by the Ponemon Institute estimates that the average cost of
downtime for organizations is approximately $5,600 per minute, underscoring the financial risks
associated with inadequate BC and DR plans (Ponemon Institute, 2022). This statistic highlights the
importance of investing in robust BC and DR strategies to mitigate potential losses and ensure business
sustainability. Organizations that experience prolonged disruptions may face not only direct financial
losses but also long-term damage to their reputation and customer trust, further emphasizing the need
for effective BC and DR measures.
The future of business continuity and disaster recovery will likely be shaped by advancements in
artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). These technologies have the potential to
significantly enhance predictive analytics and automate recovery processes, offering new opportunities
for improving resilience (Brown & Smith, 2021). AI and ML can enable organizations to predict
potential disruptions more accurately, streamline recovery processes, and optimize resource allocation
during emergencies. As these technologies continue to evolve, they are expected to play a crucial role
in shaping the future of BC and DR, offering innovative solutions for managing and mitigating risks
in an increasingly complex and dynamic environment.
18
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
Cloud computing fundamentally transforms how businesses access and utilize computing resources by
providing scalable and on-demand services over the internet. Defined by the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST), cloud computing offers a range of services including infrastructure
(IaaS), platforms (PaaS), and software (SaaS) on a pay-as-you-go basis (Mell & Grance, 2011). This
model eliminates the need for organizations to invest heavily in physical hardware and software,
allowing them to focus on their core business activities. The cloud's ability to scale resources up or
down based on demand ensures that organizations can efficiently manage their IT resources, reducing
both capital and operational expenses (Armbrust, Fox, Griffith, Joseph, Katz, Konwinski & Zaharia,
2010). This flexibility is particularly valuable in the context of business continuity and disaster
recovery, where the ability to quickly adjust resources can make a significant difference in maintaining
operations during and after a disruption.
The three primary cloud computing models—Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service
(PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS)—each offer unique benefits that support business continuity
and disaster recovery (Armbrust et al., 2010). IaaS provides virtualized computing resources over the
internet, which allows organizations to maintain and manage virtual machines, storage, and networking
without physical hardware constraints. This flexibility is crucial for disaster recovery as it enables
rapid deployment of replacement infrastructure in the event of a system failure or data loss. PaaS
facilitates the development and deployment of applications by providing a platform that includes the
operating system, middleware, and development tools. This model allows organizations to focus on
application development and deployment, which can be vital for maintaining critical business
applications during disruptions. SaaS delivers software applications over the internet, providing users
with access to essential tools from any location. This accessibility supports business continuity by
ensuring that employees can continue working even if their primary office or systems are unavailable.
Cloud computing significantly enhances business continuity by providing scalable and resilient
infrastructure that supports uninterrupted operations. Cloud services are typically hosted in multiple
geographic locations, which helps ensure data redundancy and reliability. This geographic distribution
allows organizations to maintain operations even when a disaster affects one location, as the data and
applications are replicated across various sites (Zhang, Cheng & Boutaba, 2010). According to a study
by Deloitte (2017), organizations leveraging cloud services experienced improved operational
continuity during unforeseen events due to the cloud’s inherent resilience. For instance, cloud
providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure have multiple data centers
worldwide, which facilitates continuous availability and quick recovery from localized failures. This
model of distributed computing is instrumental in minimizing downtime and ensuring that critical
business processes remain functional during and after disruptive incidents.
Disaster recovery (DR) is a core component of cloud computing, providing robust tools and services
designed to restore IT operations after a disaster. Cloud-based DR solutions offer significant
advantages over traditional DR methods, such as automated backups, real-time data replication, and
streamlined recovery processes (Mell & Grance, 2011). These features help organizations quickly
recover from various types of disruptions, including hardware failures, cyber-attacks, and natural
disasters. For instance, cloud providers often offer disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), which
includes features such as automated failover and virtualized recovery environments. A Forrester
Research (2020) study highlights that cloud-based DR solutions can reduce recovery time objectives
(RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO), thereby enhancing an organization's ability to resume
normal operations swiftly after a disaster. By integrating these solutions into their overall IT strategy,
organizations can improve their resilience and minimize the impact of disruptive events on their
operations.
19
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
One of the notable advantages of cloud-based disaster recovery is its cost efficiency. Traditional
disaster recovery solutions often require substantial investments in duplicate infrastructure and data
centers, which can be prohibitively expensive for many organizations (Hochheiser, 2014). Cloud-
based DR, on the other hand, operates on a pay-as-you-go model, allowing organizations to pay only
for the resources they use. This pricing structure helps reduce capital expenditures and operational
costs associated with maintaining an alternate DR site. According to a report by Gartner (2023),
organizations that adopt cloud-based DR solutions can achieve up to 50% cost savings compared to
traditional DR methods. This cost efficiency makes cloud-based DR an attractive option for
organizations seeking to optimize their budgets while ensuring effective disaster recovery capabilities.
Additionally, the ability to scale resources based on demand further enhances cost management, as
organizations can adjust their DR capabilities according to their specific needs and risk profiles.
Security and compliance are critical considerations in cloud computing, particularly when it comes to
business continuity and disaster recovery. Cloud providers must adhere to rigorous security standards
and regulatory requirements to ensure data protection and regulatory compliance (Jansen & Grance,
2011). For example, compliance with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR) and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is essential for
organizations that handle sensitive or personal data. Cloud providers implement various security
measures, including encryption, access controls, and regular security audits, to safeguard data and
support BC and DR efforts. The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA, 2022) reports that cloud providers
with high-security standards and compliance certifications offer increased confidence in their ability
to manage and protect data during disasters. By leveraging these secure cloud services, organizations
can enhance their disaster recovery strategies and maintain compliance with relevant regulations.
Examining real-world case studies provides valuable insights into how cloud computing supports
business continuity and disaster recovery. During the 2017 Hurricane Harvey in the USA, Walgreens
effectively utilized cloud-based solutions to maintain its operations and support disaster response
efforts (Walgreens, 2017). The company’s cloud infrastructure enabled it to continue serving
customers and manage its supply chain despite the severe impact of the hurricane. Similarly, in Japan,
SoftBank’s cloud computing solutions played a critical role in ensuring business continuity following
the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake (Kinoshita, 2017). The company’s cloud-based systems allowed it to
quickly recover and resume services, demonstrating the effectiveness of cloud computing in managing
and mitigating the effects of large-scale disasters. These case studies highlight how cloud computing
can enhance resilience and support recovery efforts in the face of various disruptions.
Integrating cloud computing with traditional disaster recovery plans offers a hybrid approach that
combines the strengths of both methods. Hybrid disaster recovery solutions integrate on-premises
infrastructure with cloud-based services to provide a more flexible and comprehensive recovery
strategy (Srinivasan & Kurnia, 2018). This integration allows organizations to use cloud resources for
backup and recovery while retaining critical infrastructure on-site for immediate access. Such a hybrid
approach enables organizations to enhance their recovery capabilities and achieve better resilience.
According to Gartner (2021), hybrid DR solutions provide organizations with greater flexibility and
more options for managing various types of disruptions. By combining on-premises and cloud-based
resources, organizations can develop a more robust and adaptive disaster recovery strategy that meets
their specific needs and risk profiles.
Despite its advantages, cloud-based disaster recovery presents several challenges and considerations
that organizations must address. Issues such as data sovereignty, vendor lock-in, and network
reliability can impact the effectiveness of cloud-based DR solutions (Rittinghouse & Ransome, 2016).
Data sovereignty refers to the legal and regulatory requirements related to where data is stored and
processed, which can vary by jurisdiction. Vendor lock-in occurs when organizations become
20
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
dependent on a specific cloud provider’s technology and services, making it difficult to switch
providers if needed. Network reliability is crucial for accessing cloud resources during a disaster, and
organizations must ensure that their network infrastructure is robust and capable of handling high
traffic loads. Addressing these challenges requires careful planning, due diligence in selecting cloud
providers, and implementing appropriate safeguards to ensure the effectiveness of cloud-based DR
solutions.
The future of cloud computing in business continuity and disaster recovery is likely to be shaped by
emerging technologies and trends. Innovations such as edge computing, artificial intelligence (AI),
and machine learning (ML) are expected to enhance cloud-based DR solutions further (Bertino &
Sandhu, 2017). Edge computing brings computational resources closer to the data source, improving
data processing speed and reducing latency. AI and ML can enhance disaster recovery by automating
response actions, predicting potential failures, and optimizing resource allocation. As cloud
technologies continue to evolve, organizations can expect even greater improvements in their ability
to manage and recover from disruptions. Staying informed about these trends and adopting new
technologies as they become available will be essential for maintaining effective business continuity
and disaster recovery strategies.
1.1 Statement of the Problem
In recent years, cloud computing has revolutionized the IT landscape by offering scalable and flexible
resources over the internet, transforming the way organizations manage their business operations and
disaster recovery strategies. Despite the widespread adoption of cloud services, there remains a
significant gap in understanding how these technologies impact business continuity (BC) and disaster
recovery (DR). According to a report by Gartner (2023), 58% of organizations experienced significant
operational disruptions due to inadequate disaster recovery plans in 2022. This statistic underscores
the critical need for comprehensive research into how cloud computing can effectively enhance
business continuity and disaster recovery frameworks. The rapid evolution of cloud technologies
necessitates an exploration of their efficacy in mitigating disruptions and ensuring operational
resilience, especially as businesses face increasingly complex and unpredictable challenges. The
existing literature reveals a gap in empirical studies that quantify the direct benefits and limitations of
cloud computing in the context of BC and DR. While many studies highlight the theoretical advantages
of cloud computing, such as its scalability and cost-effectiveness, there is a lack of detailed analysis
on its practical impact on organizational resilience during actual disaster events (Armbrust et al., 2010;
Mell & Grance, 2011). Additionally, the challenges associated with cloud-based disaster recovery,
such as data sovereignty issues and vendor lock-in, have not been sufficiently addressed. This study
aims to bridge these research gaps by providing an in-depth examination of how cloud computing
influences business continuity and disaster recovery practices, particularly in terms of recovery time
objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO) during disruptions. The findings of this study
will benefit various stakeholders, including business leaders, IT professionals, and disaster recovery
planners. For business leaders, understanding the impact of cloud computing on BC and DR can inform
strategic decisions regarding IT investments and disaster preparedness. IT professionals will gain
insights into the practical implications of cloud services for maintaining operational continuity, which
can aid in optimizing cloud-based recovery plans. Furthermore, disaster recovery planners will benefit
from evidence-based recommendations on leveraging cloud technologies to enhance recovery
capabilities and resilience. By addressing these issues, the study aims to provide actionable insights
that can help organizations better prepare for and respond to unexpected disruptions (Deloitte, 2017).
21
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Theoretical Review
2.1.1 Resource-Based View (RBV) Theory
The Resource-Based View (RBV) theory, primarily developed by Jay Barney in the early 1990s, is a
valuable framework for understanding the impact of cloud computing on business continuity (BC) and
disaster recovery (DR) (Barney, 1991). RBV posits that a firm's competitive advantage derives from
its unique bundle of resources and capabilities that are valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable.
In the context of cloud computing, this theory suggests that cloud-based resources, such as scalable
infrastructure, advanced data storage, and disaster recovery solutions, can significantly enhance an
organization's ability to maintain business continuity and recover from disruptions. The RBV theory
emphasizes that the strategic deployment of cloud technologies can provide firms with superior
resources that contribute to resilience and competitive advantage. By leveraging the flexibility and
scalability of cloud computing, organizations can ensure that their BC and DR strategies are robust,
adaptable, and aligned with their specific operational needs. This theory is relevant as it highlights how
cloud computing can transform traditional DR practices by offering dynamic and scalable solutions
that are crucial for maintaining continuity during and after disruptive events (Barney, 1991). As such,
examining cloud computing through the RBV lens helps to understand how leveraging cloud resources
can enhance organizational resilience and provide a strategic advantage in managing disaster recovery.
2.1.2 Contingency Theory
Contingency Theory, which emerged from the work of scholars such as Fred Fiedler and Paul
Lawrence in the 1960s, provides another important perspective for studying the impact of cloud
computing on BC and DR (Fiedler, 1964). This theory posits that organizational effectiveness is
contingent upon the alignment between an organization's strategies, structures, and external
environment. In the context of cloud computing, Contingency Theory suggests that the effectiveness
of cloud-based BC and DR solutions depends on how well these technologies are integrated into an
organization's overall operational context and specific needs. For example, organizations with complex
IT environments or high regulatory requirements may require tailored cloud solutions that align with
their specific BC and DR needs. This theory underscores the importance of adapting cloud computing
strategies to the unique characteristics and challenges of different organizations. By applying
Contingency Theory, researchers can explore how varying organizational contexts and requirements
influence the effectiveness of cloud-based BC and DR solutions. This approach allows for a nuanced
understanding of how cloud technologies can be customized and optimized to meet diverse
organizational needs and enhance resilience during disruptions (Fiedler, 1964).
2.1.3 Dynamic Capabilities Theory
Dynamic Capabilities Theory, introduced by David Teece, Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen in the 1990s,
offers a relevant theoretical framework for examining the impact of cloud computing on BC and DR
(Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). This theory focuses on an organization's ability to integrate, build,
and reconfigure internal and external competencies to adapt to rapidly changing environments. In the
realm of cloud computing, Dynamic Capabilities Theory emphasizes how organizations can develop
and leverage capabilities to effectively utilize cloud technologies for enhancing their BC and DR
strategies. The theory suggests that cloud computing provides organizations with the tools to rapidly
adapt and respond to changes and disruptions, thereby strengthening their overall resilience. For
instance, the ability to quickly scale cloud resources during a disaster or efficiently integrate new
cloud-based DR solutions can be seen as dynamic capabilities that contribute to an organization's
agility and continuity. By applying Dynamic Capabilities Theory, researchers can investigate how
organizations develop and refine their capabilities to exploit cloud computing for improved business
22
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
continuity and disaster recovery, and how these capabilities influence their ability to manage
disruptions effectively (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). This theory highlights the strategic role of
cloud computing in fostering organizational adaptability and resilience in the face of evolving
challenges.
2.2 Empirical Review
Zhang, Cheng & Boutaba (2010) explored the state-of-the-art cloud computing technologies and their
impact on various business processes, including business continuity and disaster recovery. The study
aimed to identify how cloud computing technologies could enhance resilience and recovery
capabilities. The authors employed a comprehensive literature review combined with case studies from
various industries to assess the impact of cloud technologies on business continuity and disaster
recovery. The study found that cloud computing offers significant benefits for business continuity and
disaster recovery, including improved scalability and flexibility. However, it also highlighted
challenges such as data security and integration issues. The authors noted that while cloud services
could provide robust disaster recovery options, the implementation of these solutions required careful
planning and consideration of specific organizational needs. The study recommended that
organizations should carefully evaluate their cloud service providers and ensure that their disaster
recovery plans are well-integrated with cloud-based solutions. It also suggested further research into
the specific risks associated with cloud-based disaster recovery.
Gartner (2021) investigated the benefits and challenges of cloud-based disaster recovery solutions,
focusing on market trends and the effectiveness of various cloud disaster recovery strategies. This
study used a market analysis approach, combining survey data from IT professionals with case studies
of organizations using cloud-based disaster recovery solutions. The report found that cloud-based
disaster recovery solutions offer substantial cost savings and flexibility compared to traditional
methods. However, it also pointed out issues such as dependency on network reliability and potential
vendor lock-in. The study emphasized that while cloud solutions can enhance recovery capabilities,
they require proper management and integration. Gartner recommended that organizations should
adopt a hybrid approach to disaster recovery, combining cloud-based solutions with traditional
methods to mitigate risks. It also suggested investing in robust network infrastructure and developing
comprehensive DR plans.
Hochheiser (2014) examined the cost benefits of cloud-based disaster recovery solutions compared to
on-premises solutions, focusing on the economic advantages and efficiency improvements. The study
utilized a quantitative approach, analyzing cost data from organizations that implemented cloud-based
disaster recovery solutions versus those using traditional methods. The study found that cloud-based
disaster recovery solutions resulted in significant cost savings due to reduced infrastructure
requirements and lower maintenance costs. It also highlighted that cloud solutions could improve
recovery times and enhance overall business continuity. Hochheiser recommended that organizations
should consider the total cost of ownership when evaluating disaster recovery options and weigh the
long-term cost benefits of cloud solutions against the initial investment.
Srinivasan & Kurnia (2018) investigated the integration of cloud computing with traditional disaster
recovery plans and assessed the effectiveness of hybrid cloud disaster recovery strategies. The authors
used a mixed-methods approach, including surveys of IT managers and case studies of organizations
employing hybrid cloud disaster recovery solutions. The study found that hybrid cloud disaster
recovery strategies could offer a balanced approach by combining the benefits of cloud computing
with existing DR practices. It noted that while hybrid solutions could improve flexibility and reduce
recovery times, they also introduced complexity and required careful management. The study
recommended that organizations implement hybrid disaster recovery solutions tailored to their specific
needs and ensure that their IT teams are trained to manage these complex systems effectively.
23
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
Forrester Research (2020) assessed the total economic impact of cloud disaster recovery solutions,
focusing on the return on investment and the impact on organizational performance. This study used a
case study approach, analyzing financial data from companies that implemented cloud disaster
recovery solutions and comparing it with pre-implementation data. The research demonstrated that
cloud disaster recovery solutions offered a positive return on investment through cost savings,
improved recovery times, and reduced downtime. It highlighted the economic advantages of adopting
cloud-based solutions over traditional DR methods. Forrester recommended that organizations should
conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis before implementing cloud disaster recovery solutions and
consider factors such as recovery times, downtime, and overall cost savings.
Rittinghouse & Ransome (2016) explored the implementation and management of cloud-based disaster
recovery solutions, focusing on practical challenges and best practices. The study employed a
qualitative approach, including interviews with IT professionals and analysis of case studies from
various industries. The study identified several key challenges in implementing cloud-based disaster
recovery solutions, including data sovereignty issues, vendor lock-in, and network reliability concerns.
It also highlighted best practices for managing these challenges, such as careful provider selection and
robust network infrastructure. The authors recommended that organizations develop comprehensive
disaster recovery plans that address potential challenges associated with cloud computing and ensure
that these plans are regularly tested and updated.
Bertino & Sandhu (2017) examined the role of edge computing in enhancing cloud-based disaster
recovery solutions, focusing on the integration of edge technologies with cloud computing. The study
used a combination of theoretical analysis and case studies to explore how edge computing can
complement cloud-based disaster recovery strategies. The research found that edge computing could
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of cloud-based disaster recovery solutions by reducing
latency and enhancing data processing capabilities. It noted that integrating edge computing with cloud
services could provide more robust and responsive disaster recovery solutions. The study
recommended that organizations consider integrating edge computing technologies with their cloud-
based disaster recovery plans to enhance performance and reduce recovery times.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that
which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from
existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as
the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied
on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through
the online journals and library.
4.0 FINDINGS
This study presented both a contextual and methodological gap. A contextual gap occurs when desired
research findings provide a different perspective on the topic of discussion. For instance, Rittinghouse
& Ransome (2016) explored the implementation and management of cloud-based disaster recovery
solutions, focusing on practical challenges and best practices. The study employed a qualitative
approach, including interviews with IT professionals and analysis of case studies from various
industries. The study identified several key challenges in implementing cloud-based disaster recovery
solutions, including data sovereignty issues, vendor lock-in, and network reliability concerns. It also
highlighted best practices for managing these challenges, such as careful provider selection and robust
network infrastructure. The authors recommended that organizations develop comprehensive disaster
recovery plans that address potential challenges associated with cloud computing and ensure that these
24
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
plans are regularly tested and updated. On the other hand, the current study focused on exploring the
impact of cloud computing on business continuity and disaster recovery.
Secondly, a methodological gap also presents itself, for instance, Rittinghouse & Ransome (2016)
employed a qualitative approach, including interviews with IT professionals and analysis of case
studies from various industries- in exploring the implementation and management of cloud-based
disaster recovery solutions, focusing on practical challenges and best practices. Whereas, the current
study adopted a desktop research method.
5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusion
The study underscores the transformative potential of cloud computing in enhancing organizational
resilience and recovery capabilities. Cloud computing has emerged as a critical enabler for businesses
seeking to fortify their continuity and disaster recovery strategies. By leveraging cloud infrastructure,
organizations can achieve unprecedented levels of scalability, flexibility, and cost efficiency, which
are vital for maintaining business operations during disruptions. The study highlights that cloud-based
solutions can significantly reduce recovery times, enabling quicker restoration of services and
minimizing operational downtime. However, the study also emphasizes that the successful
implementation of cloud-based disaster recovery solutions requires careful consideration of several
factors. Data security, regulatory compliance, and integration with existing systems are critical
concerns that need to be addressed to fully realize the benefits of cloud computing. Despite its
advantages, cloud computing introduces complexities such as vendor lock-in, data sovereignty issues,
and reliance on network connectivity. Therefore, organizations must adopt a holistic approach to
integrating cloud solutions into their disaster recovery plans, ensuring that these solutions align with
their overall business continuity objectives.
The study reveals that while cloud computing offers robust solutions for disaster recovery, it is not a
one-size-fits-all solution. Different organizations may require tailored approaches depending on their
specific needs, regulatory requirements, and risk profiles. The effectiveness of cloud-based disaster
recovery solutions varies based on factors such as the type of cloud deployment (public, private, or
hybrid), the maturity of the organization’s IT infrastructure, and the strategic alignment of the cloud
services with the organization's disaster recovery objectives. Overall, the study concludes that cloud
computing represents a significant advancement in business continuity and disaster recovery practices.
It offers substantial benefits in terms of flexibility, cost efficiency, and scalability. However, for
organizations to fully leverage these advantages, they must address the associated challenges and
integrate cloud solutions thoughtfully into their existing disaster recovery frameworks. A balanced
approach that combines cloud-based solutions with traditional methods, supported by robust
management practices and ongoing risk assessments, is essential for optimizing business continuity
outcomes.
5.2 Recommendations
The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of cloud computing's role in disaster recovery
by expanding the conceptual framework that links technological advancements to organizational
resilience. It provides a nuanced perspective on how cloud computing's inherent characteristics—such
as scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency—can enhance disaster recovery capabilities. This
theoretical foundation can guide future research into cloud computing’s impact on various aspects of
business continuity and disaster recovery, including the integration of emerging technologies and
hybrid models. The study also identifies gaps in existing theories, such as the need for a more
comprehensive understanding of how cloud computing interacts with traditional disaster recovery
methods.
25
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
Practically, the study underscores the importance of developing and implementing cloud-based
disaster recovery solutions that are tailored to the specific needs of an organization. It highlights that
businesses should conduct thorough risk assessments and evaluate cloud service providers carefully to
ensure that their disaster recovery plans are both effective and aligned with their organizational goals.
The findings suggest that organizations should invest in robust cloud infrastructure, establish clear
policies for data management and security, and continuously test and update their disaster recovery
plans to address evolving risks and technological advancements.
The study advocates for the development of industry-specific guidelines and standards for cloud-based
disaster recovery. Policymakers should work towards creating frameworks that address the unique
challenges associated with cloud computing, such as data sovereignty, security, and vendor lock-in.
These guidelines should aim to enhance the resilience of cloud-based disaster recovery solutions and
ensure that organizations can implement them effectively. Additionally, policymakers should consider
incentives for organizations to adopt best practices in cloud disaster recovery, including funding for
training and technology upgrades.
The study highlights the need for clear regulatory and compliance frameworks that address the
complexities of cloud computing in disaster recovery. Organizations must navigate various regulations
and standards related to data protection and privacy, which can impact their cloud disaster recovery
strategies. The study recommends that regulatory bodies work to simplify and harmonize compliance
requirements across different regions to facilitate smoother adoption of cloud-based disaster recovery
solutions. The study calls for further research to explore the long-term impacts of cloud computing on
business continuity and disaster recovery. Future research should investigate how different cloud
deployment models (public, private, hybrid) affect disaster recovery outcomes and assess the role of
emerging technologies, such as edge computing and artificial intelligence, in enhancing cloud-based
disaster recovery. Additionally, research should focus on case studies from various industries to
understand how cloud solutions perform under different operational conditions and regulatory
environments.
To effectively leverage cloud computing for disaster recovery, organizations should develop
comprehensive implementation strategies that include selecting appropriate cloud service providers,
integrating cloud solutions with existing disaster recovery plans, and training staff to manage and
utilize these solutions effectively. The study recommends that organizations adopt a phased approach
to cloud implementation, starting with pilot projects and gradually scaling up as they gain confidence
in the technology and its impact on their disaster recovery capabilities. The study suggests that
organizations should establish robust management practices to oversee the implementation and
maintenance of cloud-based disaster recovery solutions. This includes setting up governance
structures, defining clear roles and responsibilities, and monitoring the performance of cloud services
regularly. Effective management practices will help organizations address challenges such as service
reliability, vendor performance, and alignment with disaster recovery objectives, ensuring that cloud-
based solutions contribute positively to overall business continuity efforts.
26
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
REFERENCES
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R. H., Konwinski, A., ... & Zaharia, M.
(2010). A View of Cloud Computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50-58.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1721654.1721678
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management,
17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bertino, E., & Sandhu, R. (2017). The Role of Edge Computing in Enhancing Cloud-Based Disaster
Recovery. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 5(3), 653-663.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2017.2746010
Brown, L., & Smith, J. (2021). The Future of Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery: Leveraging
AI and Machine Learning. International Journal of Information Systems and Technology,
18(4), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00227-1
Deloitte. (2017). The Cloud Computing Advantage. Retrieved from
https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/cloud-computing-
advantage.html
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2020). Business Continuity Planning. Retrieved from
https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/Business_Continuity_Planning.pdf
Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness. Advances in Experimental
Social Psychology, 1, 149-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60051-0
Forrester Research. (2020). The Total Economic Impact of Cloud Disaster Recovery. Retrieved from
https://go.forrester.com/research/total-economic-impact-of-cloud-disaster-recovery/
Gartner. (2021). Hybrid Cloud Disaster Recovery: Strategies and Benefits. Retrieved from
https://www.gartner.com/document/4006542
Gartner. (2023). Cloud-Based Disaster Recovery Solutions: Market Trends and Insights. Retrieved
from https://www.gartner.com/document/4009871
Hargreaves, T., & Scullion, J. (2018). Business Continuity Planning and Management in the UK:
Lessons Learned from the Manchester Arena Attack. Journal of Business Continuity &
Emergency Planning, 12(3), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0043-4
Hochheiser, H. (2014). Cost Benefits of Cloud-Based Disaster Recovery. Journal of Cloud Computing,
3(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-014-0024-5
Jansen, W., & Grance, T. (2011). Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-144
Jones, R., & Williams, P. (2019). The Role of Cloud Computing in Business Continuity and Disaster
Recovery. Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications, 8(1), 34-47.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-019-0140-0
Kinoshita, K. (2017). Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity in Japan: Lessons from the 2011
Tōhoku Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 234-246.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.007
Kinoshita, Y. (2017). Cloud Computing's Role in Japan's Disaster Recovery Efforts. Japan Journal of
Information Technology, 12(4), 78-89.
Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. National Institute of
Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145
27
Journal of Technology and Systems
ISSN : 2788-6344 (Online)
Vol. 6, Issue No. 5, pp 16 – 28, 2024 www.carijournals.org
Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. National Institute of
Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145
Mkhize, M., & Nair, S. (2021). Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery in South Africa’s
Financial Sector. African Journal of Business Management, 15(7), 112-123.
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2021.9174
Ponemon Institute. (2022). Cost of Downtime Study. Retrieved from
https://www.ponemon.org/library/cost-of-downtime
Rittinghouse, J. W., & Ransome, J. F. (2016). Cloud Computing: Implementation, Management, and
Security. CRC Press.
Silva, F. P., & Costa, D. (2020). Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery in Brazil: A Case Study
of the Brumadinho Dam Collapse. Journal of Risk Research, 23(6), 788-804.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1815708
Smith, L., & Veenema, T. G. (2016). Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning for IT
Professionals. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315378623
Srinivasan, K., & Kurnia, S. (2018). Hybrid Cloud Disaster Recovery: Integrating Cloud Computing
with Traditional DR Plans. Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications,
7(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-018-0110-6
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.
Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Walgreens. (2017). How Walgreens Leveraged Cloud Computing During Hurricane Harvey.
Retrieved from https://news.walgreens.com/press-releases/2017/how-walgreens-leveraged-
cloud-computing-during-hurricane-harvey.htm
Zhang, Q., Cheng, L., & Boutaba, R. (2010). Cloud Computing: State-of-the-Art and Research
Challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 1(1), 7-18.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13174-010-0007-6
28