Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views9 pages

Analytic Function

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views9 pages

Analytic Function

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Analytic Function

1. Notations:
(a) Open disk:
Dϵ (z 0 ) is the open disk of radius ϵ >0 about z 0 z0
shown in figure. Formally, it is the set of all points
satisfying the inequality, { z :|z−z 0|< ϵ }.

(b)Closed disk:
z0
Dϵ (z 0 ) is the open disk of radius ϵ >0 about z 0
shown in figure. Formally, it is the set of all points
satisfying the inequality, { z :|z−z 0|< ϵ }.

(c) Punctured disk:


¿
Dϵ (z 0 ) is the punctured disk of radius ϵ >0 about z 0
shown in figure. Formally, it is the set of all points
satisfying the inequality, { z :0<|z −z 0|<ϵ }.

A ( α ,r , R ) is the open annulus centered at 𝞪 with radii


(d)Open annulus:

‘r’ and ‘R’ as shown in figure.


Formally, it is the set of all points satisfying the
Inequality, { z :r <|z−α|< R }.

A ( α ,r , R ) is the closed annulus centered at 𝞪 with radii


(e) Closed annulus:

‘r’ and ‘R’ as shown in figure.


Formally, it is the set of all points satisfying the
Inequality, { z :r ≤|z−α|≤ R }.
2. Partial derivatives of a function of two variables:
Let u(x , y) is a function of two variables x and y. Then its partial derivatives are defined
as,
∂u u ( x+ h , y ) −u ( x , y )
= lim
∂ x h⟶0 h
∂u u ( x , y +h )−u ( x , y )
= lim
∂ y h⟶ 0 h

3. Derivatives of a complex function:


Let f ( z )=u ( x , y )+ iv(x , y) is complex function. Then it is called differentiable at z=z 0, if the
f ( z 0 +h ) −f ( z 0 )
limit lim exists and its derivative is defined as,
h⟶0 h
'
f ( z0 + h )−f ( z 0 )
f ( z 0 )= lim
h⟶ 0 h
4. If f(z) is differentiable at 0, then it is continuous at z 0.
z
5. Cauchy Riemann Equations:
Suppose that f ( z )=u ( x , y )+ iv(x , y) is differentiable at z 0=x 0 +i y 0.
Then the partial derivatives of u and v exists at the point z 0=( x 0 , y 0 ) and
'
f ( z 0 )=ux ( x 0 , y 0 ) +i v x ( x 0 , y 0 )=u y ( x 0 , y 0 )−i v y ( x 0 , y 0 )
Thus, equating the real and imaginary parts we get,
u x ( x 0 , y 0 )=u y ( x 0 , y 0 ) and
v x ( x 0 , y 0 )=−v y ( x 0 , y 0 ),
which are called the C-R equations.
6. Polar form of C-R Equations:
Let w=f ( z ) =u ( r ,ϴ ) +iv ( r , ϴ ) is an analytic function. Then the C-R equations be,
∂v
∧∂ v
∂u 1 ∂ϴ −1 ∂u
= =
∂r r ∂r r ∂ϴ
7. Implication of C-R theorem:
(a) If ‘f’ is differentiable at z 0, then C-R equations will be satisfied at z 0 and we can use
' ' '
either f ( z 0 )=ux ( x 0 , y 0 ) +i v x ( x 0 , y 0 ) or f ( z 0 )=u y ( x0 , y 0 )−i v y ( x 0 , y 0 ) to evaluate f ( z 0 ).
(b)If C-R equations are not satisfied at z 0, then ‘f’ is not differentiable at z 0.
(c) If C-R equations are satisfied at z 0, we can not necessarily conclude that ‘f’ is
differentiable at z 0.
8. Analytic function:
Definition: A complex function f (z) is called analytic at the point z 0, if f ' ( z) exists for all
z ϵ Dϵ (z 0 ) for some ϵ >0 .
In other words, f (z) must be differential not only at z 0, but also at all points in some ϵ-
neighborhood of z 0.
(a) Sufficient conditions for f (z) to be analytic:
The function w=f ( z ) =u ( x , y ) +iv ( x , y ) is analytic in a region R if the four partial
derivatives u x , u y , v x ∧v y ,
(i) Exist and
(ii) Are continuous and
(iii) Satisfy the C-R equations at every point of R.
(b)Properties of analytic function:
(i) Harmonic property-
 The real and imaginary parts of an analytic function w=u+iv are both
necessarily harmonic functions.
That means ' u ' and ' v ' both satisfy the Laplace equation in two-dimensions. Ie,
=0 .
2 2 2 2
∂ u ∂ u ∂ v ∂ v
2
+ 2
=0 and 2
+ 2
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y
 If ‘ u ’ and ‘ v ’ are harmonic functions such that u+iv is analytic, then each is
called the conjugate harmonic function of the order in the region R.
 If f (z)=u+iv is an analytic function, then ‘ u ’ and ‘ v ’ are necessarily harmonic
functions. However, if ‘ u ’ and ‘ v ’ are harmonic functions, then f (z)=u+iv need
not to be an analytic function.
(ii) Orthogonal property-
If w=u+iv is an analytic function, then the curves of the family u=c 1 and the
curves of the family u=c 1cut orthogonally, where c 1∧c 2 are constants.
 Numerical:

1. Prove that the real and imaginary parts of an analytic function f ( z )=u +iv
satisfies the Laplace equation in two dimensions.
[VIT]

Solution:
f ( z )=u +iv is an analytic function.
So, the partial derivatives of its real and imaginary parts must satisfy the C-R
equations.
Hence,
∂u ∂v
= −−−−−−−−−−−(1)
∂x ∂ y
∂u −∂ v
¿ = −−−−−−−−−−(2)
∂ y ∂x

Differentiating (1 ) w .r . t x∧ y we get ,
2 2
∂ u ∂ v
2
= −−−−−(3)
∂ x ∂ x∂ y
2 2
∂ v ∂u
¿ 2= −−−−−(4)
∂ y ∂ y ∂x
Differentiating ( 2 ) w .r . t y∧ x we get ,
2 2
∂ u −∂ v
2
= −−−−−(5)
∂ y ∂ y∂x
2 2
∂ v −∂ u
¿ 2= −−−−−(6)
∂x ∂ x∂ y

2 2 2 2
∂ u ∂ v ∂ v ∂ u
Adding (3) and (6), 2
+ 2= − =0
∂ x ∂x ∂x ∂ y ∂x ∂ y
2 2 2 2
∂ u ∂ v −∂ v ∂ u
Adding (5) and (4), 2
+ 2
= + =0
∂ y ∂ y ∂ y ∂ x ∂ y∂ x

Which shoes that the real and imaginary parts are satisfying the Laplace’s equation
of second degree.

2. Find the value of k such that the function f ( z )=e x ( cos ky +isin ky ) is analytic.
[VIT]

Solution:
x
f ( z )=e ( cos ky +isin ky )
x x
¿ e cos ky +i e sin ky
x x
¿ u+iv , where u=e cos ky∧v=e sin ky
Thus, u x =e x cos ky , u y =−k e x sin ky
And v x =e x sin ky , v y =k e x cos ky
Since f(z) is analytic, the partial derivatives of its real and imaginary
parts satisfy the C-R equations.
Thus,
x x
u x =v y which gives e cos ky =k e cos ky ∨k=1

3. Find the values of a and b such that the function,


f ( z )= ( 2 x 2 +a y 2−2 xy ) +i ( 3 b x 2− y 2+ 4 xy ) is analytic. Also find its derivative f ( z) in
'

terms of z. [VIT]

Solution:
f ( z )= ( 2 x 2 +a y 2−2 xy ) +i ( 3 b x 2− y 2+ 4 xy )
¿ u+iv , where u= ( 2 x 2 +a y 2−2 xy ) ∧v= ( 3 b x2 − y 2+ 4 xy )

Thus, u x =4 x −2 y , u y =2ay −2 x
And v x =6 bx + 4 y , v y =−2 y + 4 x

Since, f(z) is analytic, the partial derivatives of its real and imaginary
parts satisfy the C-R equations.
Thus,
u x =v y which gives ,
4 x−2 y=−2 y +4 x
Which satisfies for any value of a and b.
And u y =−v x , which gives ,
2 ay−2 x=−6 bx −4 y
Comparing the coefficients of x and y we get,
2 a=−4 ⇒ a=−2 and
1
−6 b=−2 ⇒ b=
3

4. If w=f ( z ) =x2 + a y 2−2 xy +i ( b x 2− y 2 +2 xy ) is analytic, then find the values of a and b.


also find f ' ( z).
[VIT]

Solution:
f ( z )=x 2 +a y 2−2 xy +i ( b x 2− y 2 +2 xy )
¿ u+iv , where u=x 2 +a y 2 −2 xy ∧v=( b x 2− y 2+ 2 xy )
Thus, u x =2 x −2 y , u y =2ay −2 x
And v x =2 bx +2 y , v y =−2 y+ 2 x

Since, f(z) is analytic, the partial derivatives of its real and imaginary parts satisfy
the C-R equations.
Thus,
u x =v y which gives ,
2 x−2 y=−2 y +2 x
Which satisfies for any value of a and b.
And u y =−v x , which gives ,
2 ay−2 x=−2 bx−2 y
Comparing the coefficients of x and y we get,
2 a=−2⇒ a=−1 and
−2 b=−2⇒ b=1
Also,
'
f ( z )=u x + i v x =( 2 x−2 y )+ i ( 2 bx +2 y )=( 2 x −2 y )+i ( 2 x +2 y )

3 3
x (1+i )− y ( 1−i )
5. Prove that the function f ( z )= , z ≠ 0 , f ( 0 )=0, is not analytic even
x 2+ y 2
though C-R equations are satisfied at the origin.
[VIT

Solution:
3 3
x (1+i )− y ( 1−i )
f ( z )= ,z ≠0 Given,
x 2+ y 2
f ( 0 )=0
( x 3− y 3 ) +i ( x 3 + y 3 ) ⇒ f ( 0 , 0 )=0+i .0--------(1)
¿ 2 2
x +y But f ( x , y )=u ( x , y ) +iv (x , y )
¿ u ( x , y ) +iv ( x , y ) , ⇒ f ( 0 , 0 )=u ( 0 , 0 ) +iv (0 , 0)-------(2)
3 3 3 3
x −y x +y Comparing (1) & (2),
where u(x , y)= 2 2 ∧v (x , y )= 2 2
x +y x +y u ( 0 , 0 )=0∧v ( 0 , 0 )=0
Now,
u ( x , 0 ) −u ( 0 , 0 ) u ( x , 0 ) −u ( 0 , 0 ) x−0
u x ( 0 , 0 ) =lim =lim =lim =lim 1=1
x→ 0 x x→ 0 x x→ 0 x x →0
u ( 0 , y )−u ( 0 , 0 ) u ( 0 , y )−u ( 0 , 0 ) − y −0
u y ( 0 , 0 )=lim =lim =lim =lim (−1 )=−1
y→ 0 y x→ 0 y x →0 y x →0
v ( x , 0 )−v ( 0 ,0 ) v ( x , 0 ) −v ( 0 , 0 ) x−0
v x ( 0 ,0 )=lim =lim =lim =lim 1=1
x→ 0 x v→0 x x →0 x x→ 0
v ( 0 , y )−v ( 0 ,0 ) v ( 0 , y )−v ( 0 , 0 ) y−0
v y ( 0 , 0 ) =lim =lim =lim =lim ( 1 )=1
y →0 y v→0 y x→0 y x →0

Clearly,
u x ( 0 , 0 ) =v y ( 0 , 0 )∧u y ( 0 , 0 )=−v x ( 0 , 0 )
So, the C-R equations are satisfying at the origin.

Now,
f ( z )−f ( 0 )
f ' ( 0 )=lim
z→0 z
3 3
x ( 1+i )− y ( 1−i )
−0
x2 + y 2
¿ lim , since f ( 0 )=0∧z=x+ iy
z→0 x +iy
3 3
x ( 1+i )− y ( 1−i )
¿ lim
( x , y )→ 0 ( x 2 + y 2 ) ( x+ iy )
3 3 3
x ( 1+i )−m x ( 1−i )
¿ lim , along theline y=mx
( x , y ) → 0 ( x + m x ) ( x +imx )
2 2 2

3 3 3 3 3 3
x −m x +i x +i m x
¿ lim 3 2 3 3 3 3
( x , y ) → 0 x +m x + ℑ x +i m x

( 1−m3 ) +i ( 1+m3 )
¿ lim , which depents on the arbitrary m.
(x , y)→ 0 ( 1+ m ) + ℑ ( 1+m )
2 2

So, the limit does not exist and hence derivative does not exist.
i.e, f(z) is not differentiable at z = 0.
So, f(z) is not analytic at z = 0.
{
x y 2 ( x+iy )
if z ≠ 0
6. Show that the function f ( x )= x 2 + y 4 is not analytic at origin although
0 if z=0
C-R equations are satisfied at the origin.
Or,
2 xy (x +iy)
Show by considering the function f(z) defined by f ( z )= for z ≠ 0∧f ( 0 )=0,
x2 + y 2
that the C-R equations are not the sufficient conditions for a function to be
analytic. [VIT]

Solution:
2
x y ( x +iy ) Given,
f ( z )= , z ≠ 0 f ( 0 )=0
x2 + y 4
⇒ f ( 0 , 0 )=0+i .0--------(1)
( x 2 y 2 ) +i ( x y 3 )
¿ 2 4
But f ( x , y )=u ( x , y ) +iv (x , y )
x +y ⇒ f ( 0 , 0 )=u ( 0 , 0 ) +iv (0 , 0)-------(2)
¿ u ( x , y ) +iv ( x , y ) , Comparing (1) & (2),
2 2 3
x y xy u ( 0 , 0 )=0∧v ( 0 , 0 )=0
where u(x , y)= 2 4 ∧v (x , y )= 2 4
x +y x +y
Now,
u ( x , 0 ) −u ( 0 , 0 ) u ( x , 0 ) −u ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
u x ( 0 , 0 ) =lim =lim =lim =lim 0=0
x→ 0 x x→ 0 x x→ 0 x x→ 0
u ( 0 , y )−u ( 0 , 0 ) u ( 0 , y )−u ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
u y ( 0 , 0 )=lim =lim =lim =lim ( 0 ) =0
y→ 0 y x→ 0 y x →0 y x →0
v ( x , 0 )−v ( 0 ,0 ) v ( x , 0 ) −v ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
v x ( 0 ,0 )=lim =lim =lim =lim 0=0
x→ 0 x v→0 x x →0 x x →0
v ( 0 , y )−v ( 0 ,0 ) v ( 0 , y )−v ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
v y ( 0 , 0 ) =lim =lim =lim =lim ( 0 )=0
y →0 y v→0 y x→0 y x→ 0

Clearly,
u x ( 0 , 0 ) =v y ( 0 , 0 )∧u y ( 0 , 0 )=−v x ( 0 , 0 )
So, the C-R equations are satisfying at the origin.

Now,
f ( z )−f ( 0 )
f ' ( 0 )=lim
z→0 z
2
x y ( x+iy )
−0
x2 + y4
¿ lim , since f ( 0 )=0∧z =x+iy
z→0 x +iy
2
x y ( x +iy ) x y2
¿ lim = lim
( x , y ) → 0 ( x + y ) ( x+iy ) ( x, y ) → 0 ( x + y )
2 4 2 4

2
mx 2
¿ lim 2 , along theline y =mx
( x , y ) → 0 x ( 1+m )
m
¿ lim , which depents on the arbitrary m .
( x , y )→ 0 1+ m

So, the limit does not exist and hence derivative does not exist.
i.e, f(z) is not differentiable at z = 0.
So, f(z) is not analytic at z = 0.

Which proves that the C-R equations are not sufficient conditions for a
function to be analytic.

{
z2
,z ≠0
7. Show that the function f ( z )= z , satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations
0 , z=0
at origin but not analytic at z = 0.
[VIT]

Solution:
2
z
f ( z )= , z ≠ 0
z
( x+iy )2 ( x−iy )2 ( x −iy )3 x 3−3 x y 2−3 i x2 y +i y 3
¿ = = =
( x +iy ) ( x+iy ) ( x +iy ) ( x−iy ) x 2+ y 2
¿ u ( x , y ) +iv ( x , y ) ,
3 2 3 2
x −3 x y y −3 x y
where u(x , y)= 2 2 ∧v (x , y )= 2 2
x +y x +y
Now,
u ( x , 0 ) −u ( 0 , 0 ) u ( x , 0 ) −u ( 0 , 0 ) x−0
u x ( 0 , 0 ) =lim =lim =lim =lim 1=1
x→ 0 x x→ 0 x x→ 0 x x →0
u ( 0 , y )−u ( 0 , 0 ) u ( 0 , y )−u ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
u y ( 0 , 0 )=lim =lim =lim =lim ( 0 ) =0
y→ 0 y x→ 0 y x →0 y x →0
v ( x , 0 )−v ( 0 ,0 ) v ( x , 0 ) −v ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
v x ( 0 ,0 )=lim =lim =lim =lim 0=0
x→ 0 x v→0 x x →0 x x →0
v ( 0 , y )−v ( 0 ,0 ) v ( 0 , y )−v ( 0 , 0 ) y−0
v y ( 0 , 0 ) =lim =lim =lim =lim ( 1 )=1
y →0 y v→0 y x→0 y x →0

Clearly,
u x ( 0 , 0 ) =v y ( 0 , 0 )∧u y ( 0 , 0 )=−v x ( 0 , 0 )
So, the C-R equations are satisfying at the origin.

Now,
f ( z )−f ( 0 )
f ' ( 0 )=lim
z→0 z
2
z
−0
z
¿ lim , since f ( 0 )=0
z→0 z

() ( )
2 2 2
z z x−iy
¿ lim 2 =lim = lim
z→0 z z→0 z ( x, y)→ 0 x +iy

( )
2
x−imx 2
¿ lim , along the line y =mx
( x , y ) → 0 x +imx

( )
2
1−ℑ
¿ lim , which depents onthe arbitrary m.
( x , y ) → 0 1+ ℑ
So, the limit does not exist and hence derivative does not exist.
i.e, f(z) is not differentiable at z = 0.
So, f(z) is not analytic at z = 0.

8. Let the complex function f ( z )= √|xy| . Is the function f(z) satisfying Cauchy
Riemann equations at origin? If so, whether f(z) is analytic at origin?
[VIT]

Solution:
f ( z )= √|xy|
¿ u ( x , y ) +iv ( x , y ) ,
where u(x , y)=√| xy|∧v (x , y )=0
Now,
u ( x , 0 ) −u ( 0 , 0 ) u ( x , 0 ) −u ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
u x ( 0 , 0 ) =lim =lim =lim =lim 0=0
x→ 0 x x→ 0 x x→ 0 x x→ 0
u ( 0 , y )−u ( 0 , 0 ) u ( 0 , y )−u ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
u y ( 0 , 0 )=lim =lim =lim =lim ( 0 ) =0
y→ 0 y x→ 0 y x →0 y x →0
v ( x , 0 )−v ( 0 ,0 ) v ( x , 0 ) −v ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
v x ( 0 ,0 )=lim =lim =lim =lim 0=0
x→ 0 x v→0 x x →0 x x →0
v ( 0 , y )−v ( 0 ,0 ) v ( 0 , y )−v ( 0 , 0 ) 0−0
v y ( 0 , 0 ) =lim =lim =lim =lim ( 1 ) =0
y →0 y v→0 y x→0 y x→ 0

Clearly,
u x ( 0 , 0 ) =v y ( 0 , 0 )∧u y ( 0 , 0 )=−v x ( 0 , 0 )
So, the C-R equations are satisfying at the origin.

Now,
f ( z )−f ( 0 )
f ' ( 0 )=lim
z→0 z

¿ lim
√|xy|−0 , since f ( 0 )=0∧z=x+ iy
(x , y)→ 0 x +iy

¿ lim
√|xy|
(x , y)→ 0 x +iy

¿ lim
√|m x | , alongthe line y =mx
2
2

( x , y )→ 0 x+imx
¿ lim √ , which depents on the arbitrary m.
m
( x , y ) → 0 1+ ℑ

So, the limit does not exist and hence derivative does not exist.
i.e, f(z) is not differentiable at z = 0.
So, f(z) is not analytic at z = 0.

You might also like