Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views18 pages

Field Methods

The document outlines various field methods for data gathering, including observation, interviews, surveys, ethnography, contextual inquiry, and experiments. It emphasizes the importance of experiments in evaluating UI design issues, detailing the procedure for hypothesis testing and the advantages and common problems associated with experimental methods. Additionally, it discusses the use of analytics software and physiological techniques, such as eye tracking, for user evaluation.

Uploaded by

sibusisobheka198
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views18 pages

Field Methods

The document outlines various field methods for data gathering, including observation, interviews, surveys, ethnography, contextual inquiry, and experiments. It emphasizes the importance of experiments in evaluating UI design issues, detailing the procedure for hypothesis testing and the advantages and common problems associated with experimental methods. Additionally, it discusses the use of analytics software and physiological techniques, such as eye tracking, for user evaluation.

Uploaded by

sibusisobheka198
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Field methods

• Involves data gathering from observations and


measurements
- Each method has its strengths and weaknesses (use Triangulation)
- Broadly divided into experiment and non-experiment
- Highlighted methods are covered
Method Description Strength and weakness

Observation

Interview

Survey

Ethnography

Contextual enquiry

Experiment ……

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 27
Author: C. B-A
Experiment
• Provides evidence from data to support claims
(hypothesis)
• Can be used to evaluate different UI design issues
• Two main types:
– Absolute: specific UI on its own
– Comparative: compares two or more
• A formal method
– Usually in controlled environments (e.g., specialized
laboratories)
– Often referred to as controlled experiment
• 28-Apr-23
Basic assumption: cause and effect
6. Evaluation 28
Experiment
• Procedure
– Identify problem or purpose
– Formulate hypothesis (i.e., claim or statement), e.g.,
• Colour coding improves accuracy of selection
– Design and conduct experiment to collect data
– Analyze data for evidence to accept or reject
hypothesis

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 29
Experiment
• Experiment is designed around the hypothesis
– Independent variables (IV), i.e., controlled or
manipulated variables
– Dependent variable (DV), i.e., variable which changes
due to changes in IV
– Select sample of users and divide into groups
• Experiment group (experience the IV)
• Control group (does not experience IV)
• Note: groups can be
– Independent (e.g., two different groups of users) or
– The same group which (1) Does not experience IV and (2) Experience
IV
– Compare results
• Between groups
28-Apr-23 • Within groups 6. Evaluation 30
Experiment
• Example
– Hypothesis: “Colour coding improves accurate selection”
– IV: Colour
– DV: accurate selection
– Experiment Design: Independent (Between) 2 groups
• Experiment group: provided with colour coding for selection
• Control group no colour coding
• Collect data as users make selections
• Experiment is designed around the hypothesis (e.g., number of
errors users make, etc.)
– Any other measuments
– Compare results (data analysis) for differences between the
groups
– Accept or reject the hypothesis
28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 31
Experiment
• Example (cont’d)
– Explain how the same experiment may be designed as
within group

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 32
Experiment
• Advantages
– Collects quantitative, objective data
– Provides evidence to support claims
– Allows comparison of alternate designs
• Common problems
– Evidence may not be conclusive, e.g.,
• Results may be due to confounding variables, e.g., personal
circumstances (distraction, motivation, etc.)
– Variations, e.g., in human abilities; sample may not
represent entire users
– Ethical issues

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 33
Analytics (Softwares)
• Software tools may be used for evaluation
• May be conducted locally or remotely
• Logs user activities to understand, e.g.,
– How UI is being used
– Users, e.g., behaviour, preferences, etc.
• Example 1: To understand how learners
interact with e-learning application, e.g.,
– To compare characteristics of learners who
complete and those who drop out

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 34
Analytics (Softwares)
• Example 2: output from TechSmith’s Morae
– Measures mouse clicks for task 2 (selected in the tabbed
bar for Participant 4 (drop down list )
– Across the horizontal axis time is shown

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 35
Physiological techniques: Eye tracking
• Eye movement tracking shows participants’
changing focus on different areas of screen
• Indicates which features of UI attracted attention
and in which order…
• Large scale gaze patterns show how people move
around the screen
• Can highlight which parts of a page are most
looked (hot spots)
• Technology
– You need a basic understanding of the hardware and
software
28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 36
Physiological techniques: Eye tracking
• Participant wears a helmet that monitors and records
where on the screen the participant is looking at.

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 37
Physiological techniques: Eye tracking

More portable eye-tracking devices

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 38
Physiological techniques: Eye tracking
• The heatmaps from the eyetracking study
- Red: area where the user looked most; yellow fewer; and blue the fewest;
gray not viewed;
- Image on the left “About us” section of a company web site; center: a
product page of e-commerce web site, and right search engine results page
(Jakob Nielson)

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 39
Physiological techniques: Other
• Common changes which are measured
– Heart rate
– Perspiration
– Skin temperature
• All are effects of changes in arousal as a result of
emotional response
• Problems
– The emotion evoked cannot be identified

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 40
Observation(Thinkaloud)
• A type of observations
• Self-study

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 41
Summary
• We have covered the following:
– Factors to consider when selecting a method of evaluation
– Inspection techniques: Heuristic Evaluation and Cognitive
Walkthrough
– Experiments
– Physiological (eye tracking) and other techniques
– In each case, we have looked at the procedure, context of
use, advantage and common problems

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 44
Questions and Feedback

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 45
End of Session

28-Apr-23 6. Evaluation 46

You might also like