TQM Unit 4
TQM Unit 4
Quality circles – Quality Function Deployment (QFD) - Taguchi quality loss function –
TPM – Concepts, improvement needs – Performance measures- Cost of Quality - BPR.
Part-A
Part-B
1. What are the types of customer information? How is it collected? How it is used in QFD?
Introduction:
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a planning tool used to fulfill customer expectations.
It is a disciplined approach to product design, engineering and production and
provides in-depth evaluation of a product.
QFD focuses on customer expectations or requirements often referred to as the voice of the
customer.
It is employed to translate customer expectations in terms of specific requirements, in two
directions and actions, in terms of engineering or technical characteristics that can be
deployed through
Product planning
Part development
Process Planning
Production Planning
Service Industries
QFD Team:
When an organization decides to implement QFD, the project manager and team members
need to be able to commit a significant amount of time to it, especially in the early stages.
Teams compose of members from marketing, design, quality, finance and production.
One of the most important tools in the QFD process is communication.
Team meetings are very important in the QFD process.
The team leader needs to ensure that the meetings run in the most efficient manner and that
the members are kept informed.
The meeting format should have some way of measuring how well the QFD process is
working at each meeting and should be flexible depending on certain situations.
Words used by the customer to describe their expectations are often referred to as the
voice of the customer.
Customer satisfaction like quality is defined as meeting or exceeding customer expectations.
QFD begins with marketing to determine what exactly the customer desires from a product.
During the collection of information, the QFD team must continually ask and answer
numerous questions such as
a) What does the customer really want?
b) What are the customers’ expectations?
c) Are the customers’ expectations used to drive the design process?
d) What can the design team to do achieve customer satisfaction?
BENEFITS OF QFD :
1. Improves Customer satisfaction
Creates focus on customer requirements
Uses competitive information effectively
Prioritizes resources
Identifies items that can be acted upon
3. Provides Documentation
Documents rationale for design
Adds structure to the information
Adapts to changes (a living document)
Part-A
1. What is meant by cost of internal failures?
2. What is meant by cost of internal failures?
3. List out the type of internal failures?
Part-B
1. Plan and discuss about the Construction the House of Quality.
2. Discuss with an example the stages in building the House of Quality.
HOUSE OF QUALITY :
The primary planning tool used in QFD is the house of quality. The house of quality translates the voice
of the customer in to design requirements that meet specific target values and matches those against
how an organization will meet those requirements. Many managers and engineers consider the house of
quality to be primary chart in quality planning.
The goal of the house of quality is to design or change the design of a product in away
that meets or exceeds the customer expectations.
Here the customer needs and expectations are expressed in terms of customer requirements; it
is the duty of the QFD team to convert these requirements in to engineering characteristics or
technical descriptors.
Implementation of the customer requirements is difficult until they are translated in to
counterpart characteristics.
Counterpart characteristics are an expression of the voice of the customer in technical
language.
The list of technical descriptors is divided in two primary, secondary and tertiary technical
descriptors.
Determine their respective relationships.
One way to reduce the confusion associated with determining the relationships between
customer requirements and technical descriptors is to use an L-Shaped matrix.
The L-Shaped matrix makes interpreting the complex relations very easy and does not
require a significant amount of experience.
The inside of the house of quality is called as the relationship matrix and it is usually filled
by the QFD team.
It is common to use symbols to represent the relationship between the customer
requirements and descriptors.
Example:
A solid circle represents a strong relationship
A single circle represents a
medium relationship A triangle
represents a weak relationship.
An empty column indicates that a particular technical descriptor does not affect any of the customer
requirements and after careful scrutiny may be removed from the house of quality.
Step 4: Develop an interrelationship Matrix between HOWs
The roof of the house of the quality called the correlation matrix is used to identify any
interrelationships between each of the technical descriptors.
Symbols:
The competitive assessments are a pair of weighted tables that depict item for item how
competitive products are compared with current organization products.
The competitive assessment tables are separated in to two categories customer assessment
and technical assessment.
The numbers 1 through 5 are listed in the competitive evaluation column to indicate a
rating of 1 for worst and 5 for best.
The customer competitive assessment is a good way to determine is the customer
requirements has been met and identifies areas to concentrate in on the next design.
Customer requirements and technical descriptors that are strongly related should also
exhibit a strong relationship in their competitive assessments.
If an organization technical assessment shows its products to be superior to the
competition, then the customer assessment should show a superior assessment.
If the customer disagrees, then a mistake in engineering judgement has occurred
and should be corrected.
Importance to customer
Target value
Scale-up factor
Sales point
An absolute weight
1. Marketing/Consumer/User:
Costs are incurred in the accumulation and continued evaluation of customer and user quality
needs and perceptions affecting user satisfaction with the organizations product or service.
2. Product/Service/Design Development:
Costs are incurred to translate customer and user needs in to reliable quality standards and
requirements and to manage the quality of new product or service.
3. Purchasing:
Costs are incurred to assure conformance requirements of supplier parts, materials or processes and to
minimize the impact of supplier non conformance on the quality of delivered products or services.
Costs are incurred in assuring the capability and readiness of operations to meet quality standards
and requirements and to impart quality education to operating personnel.
5. Quality Administration:
Costs are incurred in the overall administration of the quality management function.
Operations appraisal costs can generally be considered the costs incurred for the test or audit required
to determine and assure the acceptability of product or service.
External appraisal costs are incurred for field set up or installation and check out for the acceptance of
customers.
Costs are incurred for regular reviewing inspection and test data, prior to release of the product for
shipment.
Costs involved in quality audits to assure continued ability to provide acceptable support to the
production process.
Design failure costs are the unplanned costs that are incurred because of inherent design inadequacies.
The costs associated with nonconforming product or service discovered during the operations
process. It is categorized in to three distinct areas: material review and corrective action, rework or
repair costs and scrap costs.
It includes the total cost of investigating, resolving and responding to individual customer and user
complaints.
2. Returned Goods:
Retrofit and recall costs are those costs required to modify or update products or field service facilities
to a new design change level, based on major redesign due to design deficiencies.
Warranty Claims
Warranty costs include the total costs of claims paid to the customer or user after acceptance to cover
expenses, including repair costs, such as removing defective hardware from a system, or cleaning
costs, due to food or chemical service accident.
4. Liability Costs
Liability costs are organization-paid costs due to liability claims, including the cost of product or
service liability insurance.
5. Penalties
Penalty costs are those costs incurred because less than full product or service performance is
achieved as required by contracts with customers or by government rules and regulations.
This category involves costs incurred that customers are not satisfied with quality of delivered
product or service because the customer’s quality expectations were greater than the quality they
received.
7. Lost Sales
Lost sales comprise the value of the contribution to profit that is lost due to sales reduction because of
quality problems.
Part-A
Part-B
1. Explain the different types of cost contributing to the cost of quality. MAY/JUNE 2017)
2. Explain the Taguchi’s quadratic quality loss function. How it differs from traditional
approach of quality loss cost? (MAY/JUNE 2017)
3. Explain briefly about the following i. Taguchi quality loss function. (MAY/JUNE 2019)
INTRODUCTION
Taguchi Methods is a statistical methods developed largely by GENICHI
TAGUCHI to improve quality of manufactured goods.
The philosophy of off-line quality control.
Innovations in the design of experiments.
Problem
A part dimension on a power tool is specified as 32.25±0.25.Company records show±0.25
exceeded & 75% of the returned fo replacement. Cost of replacement is Rs.12,500.Determine
k & QLF.
Solution :
Expected Cost of repair C = 0.75(12500) = Rs 9,375
k = C/d²= 9375/(90.25)² = Rs 1,50,000
QLF =L (x) 1,50,00(x-N)
Taguchi’s Quality Loss Function concept combines cost, target and variation in one metric
with specifications being of secondary importance. Taguchi has defined quality as the loss
imparted to society from the time a product is shipped. Societal losses include failure to meet
customer requirements, failure to meet ideal performance and harmful side effects.
Taguchi methods emphasised quality through robust design, not quality through inspection.
Taguchi breaks the design process into three stages:
Taguchis Robust Design methodologies allow the designer through experiments to determine which
factors most affect product performance and which factors are unimportant. The designer can focus
on reducing variation on the important or critical factors. Unimportant or uncontrollable ―noise
factors have negligible impact on the product performance and can be ignored.
Part-B
1. Write notes on Typical performance measures of TQM. (NOV/DEC 2015) (R).
2. What are the goals of TPM and explain the six losses in TPM? (NOV/DEC 2016)
3. Explain the seven steps plan to establish the TPM in an organization in detail. (NOV/DEC
2019)
4. Explain the different steps involved in Failure Mode Effect Analysis with an example.
(APRIL/MAY 2019)
Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is defined as keeping the running plant and equipment
at its highest productive level with the co-operation of all areas of the organization.
Predictive and Preventive maintenance are essential to building a foundation for a
successful TPM environment. Predictive Maintenance is the process of using data and
statistical tools to determine when a piece of equipment will fail. Preventive Maintenance is
the process of periodically performing activities such as lubrication on the equipment to keep it
running.
OBJECTIVES OF TPM :
1. To maintain and improve equipment capacity.
2. To maintain equipment for life.
3. To use support from all areas of the operation.
4. To encourage input from all employees.
5. To use teams for continuous improvement.
Steps:
TPM is merely trying to tap in to an unused resource, the brain power and problem solving
ability of all the organizations employees.
Thus it is necessary to allow people to make decisions.
Many organizations have had the flavor-of-the-mouth approach to changing management
techniques.
This approach has led to credibility problems with employees.
Management is changed and the new manger does not build on past accomplishments but
develops a new system that will presumably solve all of the organizations problems.
Lack of ownership seems to cause low cause morale and dissatisfaction with management.
Ownership should be based on what is good for the customer and for the employees
that serve the customer.
3. Training:
Senior management must spend time learning about and understanding the
ramifications of this philosophy to their organization.
Some managers are needed to be replaced because they don’t accept change and also
identify managers who readily respond to new philosophy.
First line supervisors need to learn their role in what most likely will be a new environment.
There needs to be some instruction in the areas of jobs that maintenance people do
and jobs that production people do.
A great benefit of TPM is the cross-pollination of ideas between maintenance
technicians and production operators.
4. Improvement Needs:
There are usually some machines that seem to be on the verge of breaking down or require
an excessive amount of maintenance.
Employees who work with the equipment on a daily basis are better able to identify those
conditions than anyone else in the organization.
A good first step is to let the operators and maintenance technicians tell management
which machines and systems need the most attention.
An implementation team of operators and technicians to coordinate this process is essential.
Six Losses:
Downtime Losses:
Planned
Start ups
Shift Changes
Coffee and lunch breaks
Unplanned:
Equipment breakdown
Change over’s
Lack of material
Idling and minor stoppages
Slow downs and poor quality losses
Process nonconformities
Scrap
5. Goal:
6. Developing Plans:
First, develop and implement an overall plan of action for training all employees.
Plans for developing the autonomous work groups should take place during the training phase.
Autonomous work groups are established based on the natural flow of activity.
First make the operator responsible for the equipment and the level of maintenance that he is
capable of performing.
Next, identify the maintenance personnel who work in certain areas or have certain skill levels.
Operators and maintenance personnel are brought together resulting in an autonomous work
group.
These groups must have the authority to make decisions about keeping the equipment in first
class running order.
The FMEA process is an on-going, bottom-up approach typically utilised in three areas of product
realization and use, namely design, manufacturing and service. A design FMEA examines potential
product failures and the effects of these failures to the end user, while a manufacturing or process
FMEA examines the variables that can affect the quality of a process. The aim of a service FMEA is
to prevent the misuse or misrepresentation of the tools and materials used in servicing a
product.There is not a single, correct method for conducting an FMEA, however the automotive
industry and the U.S. Department of Defense (Mil-Std-1629A) have standardised
procedures/processes within their respective realms. Companies who have adopted the FMEA
process will typically adapt and apply the process to meet their specific needs. Typically, the main
elements of the FMEA are:
The failure mode that describes the way in which a design fails to perform as intended or
according to specification;
The effect or the impact on the customer resulting from the failure mode; and
the cause(s) or means by which an element of the design resulted in a failure mode.
It is important to note that the relationship between and within failure modes, effects and causes can
be complex. For example, a single cause may have multiple effects or a combination of causes could
result in a single effect. To add further complexity, causes can result from other causes, and effects
can propagate other effects.
As with most aspects of design, the best approach to completing an FMEA is with cross- functional
input. The participants should be drawn from all branches of the organisation including purchasing,
marketing, human factors, safety, reliability, manufacturing and any other appropriate disciplines. To
complete the FMEA most efficiently, the designer should conduct the FMEA concurrently with the
design process then meet with the cross- functional group to discuss and obtain consensus on the
failure modes identified and the ratings assigned.
Designers often focus on the safety element of a product, erroneously assuming that this directly
translates into a reliable product. If a high safety factor is used in product design, the result may be an
overdesigned, unreliable product that may not necessarily be able to function as intended. Consider
the aerospace industry that requires safe and reliable products that, by the nature of their function,
cannot be overdesigned.
As mentioned previously, there is not one single FMEA method. The following ten steps provide a
basic approach that can be followed in order to conduct a basic FMEA. An example of a table lamp is
used to help illustrate the process. Attachment A provides a sample format for completing an FMEA.
Step 1: Identify components and associated functions
The first step of an FMEA is to identify all of the components to be evaluated. This may include all
of the parts that constitute the product or, if the focus is only part of a product, the parts that make up
the applicable sub-assemblies. The function(s) of each part within in the product are briefly
described.
The potential failure mode(s) for each part are identified. Failure modes can include but are not
limited to:
For each failure mode identified, the consequences or effects on product, property and people are
listed. These effects are best described as seen though the eyes of the customer.
This step involves determining or estimating the probability that a given cause or failure mode will
occur. The probability of occurrence can be determined from field data or history of previous
products. If this information is not available, a subjective rating is made based on the experience and
knowledge of the cross-functional experts.
Two of the methods used for rating the probability of occurrence are a numeric ranking and a
relative probability of failure. Attachment C provides an example of a numeric ranking. As with a
numeric severity rating, a numeric probability of occurrence rating can be used in calculating the
RPN. If a relative scale is used, each failure mode is judged against the other failure modes. High,
moderate, low and unlikely are ratings that can be used. As with severity ratings, probability of
occurrence ratings can be customised if they are well defined, documented and used consistently.
Identify the controls that are currently in place that either prevent or detect the cause of the failure
mode. Preventative controls either eliminate the cause or reduce the rate of occurrence. Controls that
detect the cause allow for corrective action while controls that detect failure allow for interception of
the product before it reaches subsequent operations or the customer.
The control effectiveness rating estimates how well the cause or failure mode can be prevented or
detected. If more than one control is used for a given cause or failure mode, an effectiveness rating is
given to the group of controls. Control effectiveness ratings can be customised provided the
guidelines as previously outlined for severity and occurrence are followed. Attachment D provides
example ratings.
Step 9: Calculate Risk Priority Number (RPN)
The RPN is an optional step that can be used to help prioritise failure modes for action. It is
calculated for each failure mode by multiplying the numerical ratings of the severity, probability of
occurrence and the probability of detection (effectiveness of detection controls) (RPN=S x O x D). In
general, the failure modes that have the greatest RPN receive priority for corrective action. The
RPN should not firmly dictate priority as some failure modes may warrant immediate action although
their RPN may not rank among the highest.
Step 10: Determine actions to reduce risk of failure mode
Taking action to reduce risk of failure is the most crucial aspect of an FMEA. The FMEA should be
reviewed to determine where corrective action should be taken, as well as what action should be
taken and when. Some failure modes will be identified for immediate action while others will be
scheduled with targeted completion dates.
What is Business Process Re-engineering (BPR)?
Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) is a strategic approach to improve an organization’s
performance by rethinking and redesigning its business processes. The goal of BPR is to achieve
significant improvement in parameters like cost, quality, service, and speed.
1. The aim is to improve customer satisfaction by improving the quality and speed of services
delivered.
2. It involves questioning the basic assumptions and principles of current business processes.
3. It involves the collaboration of cross-functional teams to ensure all the aspects of the processes
are considered.
4. Its successful implementation requires effective change management strategies to handle
resistance to change.
Principles of BPR
Here are seven key principles of BPR:
1. Focus on Desired Outcomes: BPR emphasizes organizing processes based on desired outcomes,
rather than individual tasks and designing processes that achieve these outcomes efficiently.
2. Identify and Eliminate Non-Value-Adding Activities: BPR aims to eliminate non-value-added
activities by analyzing processes, thereby reducing waste and unnecessary bottlenecks.
3. Integrate Multiple Steps: BPR emphasizes combining multiple steps and ensures that
information processing occurs as a part of the actual work process. This helps to simplify the
process and reduce delays.
4. Coordinate Geographically Dispersed Resources: BPR advocates to use of technology to
integrate and treat geographically dispersed resources as a centralized source to create a unified
process and improve accuracy.
5. Link Parallel Activities: BPR focuses on integrating parallel activities to enable simultaneous
processing and thus reducing the wait time and errors.
6. Empower Employees: BPR advocates to empower employees so that they can make decisions at
the point where the work is performed, thus enabling faster and more efficient decision-making.
7. Capture Information Once at the Source: BPR emphasizes capturing information once and
ideally at the source to avoid duplication and errors. The same information can be used throughout
the process.
When You Should Consider BPR?
BPR should be considered under the following circumstances:
1. Significant Performance Gaps: When there is a significant discrepancy between current
performance and desired outcomes then there is a need to implement BPR.
2. Shift in Market Dynamics: In response to changes in market conditions, such as changing
customer demands, or emerging technologies, that require rethinking of business operations.
3. Strategic Shift: When an organization undergoes a strategic shift such as launching new products
or changing business models, requiring alignment of processes with new strategic objectives.
4. Customer Dissatisfaction: When there is customer dissatisfaction due to poor quality, or slow
service, thus indicating process redesign to enhance customer experience.
5. Cost Reduction Needs: When there is a need to reduce operational costs without compromising
quality, there is the necessity of re-engineering processes to eliminate waste and improve
efficiency.
Steps to BPR
Here is a brief overview of how BPR works:
1. Identify Processes: This step involves identifying processes for re-engineering that require the
improvement most and will offer the greatest benefit from re-engineering.
2. Understand Existing Processes: Conduct a thorough analysis of current processes to identify
inefficiencies and bottlenecks.
3. Define Objectives: Set clear and specific goals for the re-engineering process such as cost
reduction, faster service, improved quality, and many more.
4. Form a Cross-Functional Team: Form a team of members from various departments to bring
diverse expertise to the re-engineering process.
5. Redesign Processes: Rethink and redesign processes from the ground up, focusing on eliminating
non-value-adding activities.
6. Implement Changes: Execute new process designs and ensure that all necessary resources are
available to facilitate a smooth transition.
7. Monitor and Optimize: Continuously track the performance of re-engineered processes and
make changes as needed to ensure that they meet the desired outcomes.
PART-A
1. What is a QFD?
Quality Function Deployment is a planning tool used to fulfil customer expectations. It is a
disciplined approach to product design, engineering, and production and provides in-depth
evaluation of a product.
5. Give the seven basic steps to get an organization started toward TPM?
a) Management learns the new philosophy
b) Management promotes the new philosophy
c) Training is funded and developed for everyone in the organization
d) Areas of needed improvement are identified
e) Performance goals are formulated
f) An implementation plan is developed
g) Autonomous work groups are established
23. What are the functions of quality circles (MAY/JUNE 2013) /(NOV/DEC 2013)
quality circle is a volunteer group composed of workers (or even students), who do the
same or similar work, usually under the leadership of their own supervisor (or an elected
team leader), who meet regularly in paid time who are trained to identify, analyze and solve
work-related problems and present their solutions to management
26. What are the big losses avoided by TPM? (MAY/JUNE 2014)
TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) is a holistic approach to equipment maintenance that strives to
achieve perfect production.
Part-B
1. Discuss about the objectives, process, outcome and benefits of quality functional deployment
(QFD). (APRIL/MAY 2018)
3. Describe the different benchmarking metrics that can be used in educational institutions.
(APRIL/MAY 2019) (R)
4. Explain the different steps involved in Failure Mode Effect Analysis with an example.
(APRIL/MAY 2021) (R)
5 Explain the seven steps plan to establish the TPM in an organization in detail.(NOV/DEC 2011)
(R)
6 Explain the concept of Taguchi's quality loss function in detail. Give an example (NOV/DEC
2011) (R)
7. Devise a QFD methodology for design and development of cups used in vending machine for
dispersing hot and cold beverages. (APRIL/MAY 2012) (U)
9 i) What are the goals of TPM and explain the six losses in TPM? (R)
ii Explain the components of Quality costs. (NOV/DEC 2012) (R)
10 Write notes on :
i. QFD
ii Quality circles
iii Typical performance measures of TQM. (NOV/DEC 2012) (R)
11. With suitable example explain various stages of building a house of quality matrix.
(MAY/JUNE 2013) (R)
12.i Explain the different types of cost contributing to the cost of quality. (R)
ii Explain the Taguchi’s quadratic quality loss function. How it differs from traditional
approach of quality loss cost? (MAY/JUNE 2013) (R)
13. Explain the various types of cost contributing to the cost of quality .Give example for each
(NOV/DEC 2013) (U)
14.Discuss in detail how the voice of customer in transformed into technical and functional
requirements by QFD (NOV/DEC 2013) (U) (R)
15. Draw the house of quality for a product of your choice and describe the QFD methodology.
(Apr/May 2015) (U) (R)
16. Describe a basic structure of house of quality a primary planning tool used in QFD?
(MAY/JUNE 2016) (R)
17. Explain the difference between x-bar and R-charts? (MAY/JUNE 2016) (U)