Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views2 pages

Summary of Predictive Insights

The document outlines key risk factors for customer delinquency, highlighting employment status, credit card type, and credit utilization. It recommends a targeted early intervention program for high-risk customers, aiming for a 15% reduction in delinquency within six months. Additionally, it addresses ethical AI considerations, proposing fairness metrics and model explainability techniques to mitigate bias and enhance transparency.

Uploaded by

jobinjinsa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views2 pages

Summary of Predictive Insights

The document outlines key risk factors for customer delinquency, highlighting employment status, credit card type, and credit utilization. It recommends a targeted early intervention program for high-risk customers, aiming for a 15% reduction in delinquency within six months. Additionally, it addresses ethical AI considerations, proposing fairness metrics and model explainability techniques to mitigate bias and enhance transparency.

Uploaded by

jobinjinsa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Summary of Predictive Insights

Top 3 Risk Factors

Employment Status: Unemployed customers have a higher rate of


delinquency compared to those who are employed or self-employed. This
indicates a strong link between consistent income and timely payments.

Credit Card Type: Customers with a Business credit card show a


surprisingly high delinquency rate. This may suggest that a significant portion
of these customers are small business owners who face unique financial
pressures.

Credit Utilization: While not a strong individual predictor, customers flagged


as delinquent have a slightly higher average credit utilization, indicating that
higher debt levels relative to available credit could contribute to a higher risk
of missed payments.

Business Recommendation Framework


SMART Recommendation

Specific: Launch a targeted early intervention program for new customers identified
as high-risk, focusing specifically on unemployed individuals or business cardholders.
Measurable: Aim to reduce the delinquency rate within this high-risk segment by
15% within the next six months. Achievable: The program will utilize proactive
communication (e.g., automated reminders, personalized financial advice via SMS or
email) to address potential issues before they escalate. Relevant: This program will
directly address key risk factors identified in our analysis, leading to a decrease in
delinquency rates and a reduction in collection costs. Time-bound: The program will
be implemented and its effectiveness will be measured over a six-month period, with
a full review at the end of the term.

Ethical and Responsible AI


Considerations
Fairness Risks and Mitigation

Risk 1: Socioeconomic Bias The model might disproportionately flag


customers in certain employment categories (e.g., Unemployed) as high-risk,
potentially creating a feedback loop where these groups are offered fewer
financial products or receive harsher terms.
Mitigation 1: We will use fairness metrics like the Disparate Impact Ratio
to continuously monitor the model's predictions across different employment
statuses. If a bias is detected, we will adjust the model's features or apply a re-
weighting technique to ensure fair and equitable outcomes for all customer
segments.

Risk 2: Algorithmic Transparency Using a complex model like a Gradient


Boosting Machine could make it difficult for stakeholders to understand why a
specific customer was flagged as high-risk. This lack of transparency could
hinder trust and make it difficult to explain decisions to regulators or
customers.

Mitigation 2: We will use model explainability techniques such as SHAP


(SHapley Additive exPlanations) values to provide clear, human-readable
explanations for each prediction. This will allow the collections team to
understand which features most influenced a customer's risk score, enabling
them to make more informed, empathetic, and explainable decisions.

You might also like