Polymer Hardness Testing
Polymer Hardness Testing
HARDNESS OF POLYMERS
S. B. A i n b i n d e r a n d M. G. Laka
UDC 6 7 8 . 5 3 9 . 5 3 . 5 4 1 . 6
Hardness was measured on a Rockwell type instrument modified to investigate the mechanical nature of polymer hardness
measure the depth of the umecovered indentation. The indentors were more thoroughly and to determine how and under what
balls of various diameters and cones with various vertex angles. The conditions a relation can be established between hard-
hardness of the folIowing materials was investigated: aminoptast (amino
ness and other mechanical characteristics. This is the
resin), K-17-2, FKP-t, polymethylmethacrylate (plexiglas), polyvinyl
chloride (PVC), polyethylene, and teflon. The hardness is related to the
subject of the present paper.
strength and elastic characteristics.
H a r d n e s s i s o n e of t h e b a s l e m e c h a n i c a l c h a r a c t e r - h
mm
[ s t i e s of m a c h i n e - b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s . As c o m p a r e d
with other characteristics, hardness has the advantage 0.o
of b e i n g e a s y to m e a s u r e . In f a c t , t h e h a r d n e s s o f a
g i v e n m a t e r i a l c a n b e d e t e r m i n e d f r o m a n y p i e c e of
s u f f i c i e n t s i z e , a n d in s o m e e a s e s on t h e f i n i s h e d p a r t , 0.2
in a m a t t e r of s e c o n d s . F o r m a n y m a t e r i a l s a r e l i a b l e
correlation has been established between hardness and
ultimate strength, and for nonhardening or work- o 219t m~n
hardened materials between hardness and yield point,
T h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g f o r m u l a s h a v e t h e f o r m ~S,B = F i g . 2. I n d e n t a t i o n d e p t h v e r s u s t i m e
= e H B , w h e r e H B is t h e B r i n e t l h a r d n e s s , e a c o n - following unloading. Notation same as
s t a n t , a n d OrS,B t h e y i e l d p o i n t (aS) o r u l t i m a t e s t r e n g t h in F i g . 1.
(orB).
Method of investigation. Hardness was measured on a Rockwell type
instrument modified to measure the depth of the unrecovered indentation.
The indentors were balls 5, 8.2, and 2 mm in diameter and cones with
c' hmm}-- vertex angles of 120°, 90°, 60°, and 30°.
The hardness of the following materials was investigated: aminoplast
(amino resin), K-17-2, FKP-1, polymethylmethacrylate (plexiglas),
polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene, and teflon. The first three
materials are thermosets with different fillers; polymethylmethacrylate
and PVC are amorphous thermoplastic materialS that are brittle at
room temperature; polyethylene and teflon are crystalline materials
2 0 2 0 in the high-elastic and brittle states at the test temperatureo AI1 the
tests were conducted at room temperature. The thermoset test pieces,
F i g . 1. D e p t h of p e n e t r a t i o n of s p h e r i - 25 mm in diameter, h = 5 ram, were prepared by molding from the
c a l i n d i c a t o r v e r s u s l o g a r i t h m of t h e corresponding molding powders. The low-density polyethylene test
pieces were prepared by injection molding, while the teflon, poly-
t i m e of a p p l i c a t i o n of t o a d : 1) p o l y e t h y -
methylmethacrylate and PVC test pieces were cut out of ready-made
l e n e , 2) P V C , 3 ) t e f l o n , 4 ) p l e x i g l a s s , sheets. Test pieces for tensile and compressive tests were also prepared
5) m o n o l i t M - l ( s a w d u s t - f i I l e d p h e n o l - from the materials mentioned.
f o r m a l d e h y d e r e s in). The following tests were performed:
1) determination of the depth of penetration as a function of [he
A s f a r a s t h e h a r d n e s s of p o l y m e r s is c o n c e r n e d , time of application of the load;
2) determination of the recovery as a function of time following
t h e s i t u a t i o n is r a t h e r d i f f e r e n t . In t h i s c a s e t h e h a r d -
unloading;
n e s s m u s t be d e t e r m i n e d f r o m the s i z e of the u n t o - 3) determination of the effect of the magnitude of the load on the
c o v e r e d i n d e n t a t i o n owing to the high e l a s t i c and cone hardness;
r e l a x a t i o n a l r e c o v e r y , w h i c h is d i f f e r e n t f o r d i f f e r e n t 4) determination of the hardness HB (load divided by indentation
m a t e r i a l s [ 1 - 3 ] . A c c o r d i n g l y , it is n e c e s s a r y to u s e area) and HM (load divided by indentation area projected onto the
p r e s s e s of s p e c i a l d e s i g n . M o r e o v e r , no r e l i a b l e r e - plane of the test piece) at different penetration angles or ratios d/D
(where d is the diameter of the indentation, D the diameter of the baH),
lation has yet been established between hardness and
and different ball diameters and cone angles. The areas were calcuIated
y i e l d p o i n t o r u l t i m a t e s t r e n g t h . S o m e a u t h o r s [4, 5]
from the measured depth of the unrecovered indentation;
a s s e r t t h a t t h e r e is no s u c h r e l a t i o n . S i n c e t h e h a r d - 5) determination of the o(s) relation in tension and compression for
h e s s m e a s u r i n g p r o c e s s ts v e r y s i m p l e and can be test pieces of the materials used in studying hardness. All the experi-
u s e d i n v a r i o u s f o r m s of i n d u s t r i a l t e s t i n g a n d r e s e a r c h , mental points are the means of three to five measurements. The maxi-
it is a matter of scientific and practical importance to mum deviations from the mean were 10%.
212 MEKHANIKA P O L I M E R O V
p o l y e t h y l e n e and p l e x i g l a s s . The r e c o v e r y r a t e is
g r e a t e s t f o r p o l y e t h y l e n e and p l e x i g l a s s .
r'o t The M a x w e l l , Vo[gt and s o - c a l l e d s e c o n d Maxwell
so ~'r k'r- ~ [ 1 r e~ ( s t a n d a r d s o l i d ) equations l e a d to a r e l a t i o n of the
oo [ I f o r m t = c lg e. Thus, t h e s e r e l a t i o n s a r e not s u i t a b l e
20 ~ ~ "~ f o r d e s c r i b i n g the r e s u l t s of our t e s t s . We note t h a t
1) t h e t e s t s d e s c r i b e d a r e c h a r a c t e r i z e d by a c o m p l e x
0 00 BO 120 200
s t a t e of o m n i d i r e c t i o n a l n o n u n i f o r m c o m p r e s s i o n ; 2)
F i g . 3. R e l a t i v e r e c o v e r y v e r s u s the s t r a i n c o n s i d e r a b l y e x c e e d s the y i e l d point o r h i g h -
p e n e t r a t i o n a n g l e : 1, 2) r e l a t i v e r e - e l a s t i c l i m i t ; and, f i n a l l y , 3) the t e s t s a r e c o n d u c t e d
c o v e r y of p y l o e t h y l e n e and K - 1 7 - 2 not u n d e r c o n d i t i o n s of c o n s t a n t s t r e s s , a s is u s u a l l y
f o r s p h e r i c a l i n d e n t o r s ; l a , 2a) t h e the c a s e in studying c r e e p , but u n d e r c o n d i t i o n s of
s a m e f o r c o n i c a l i n d e n t o r s , A) p o i n t s c o n s t a n t load. The l o g a r i t h m i c d e p e n d e n c e of s t r a i n
obtained by calculating the relative on t i m e h a s b e e n o b t a i n e d by a n u m b e r of o t h e r
r e c o v e r y of p o l y e t h y l e n e f o r s p h e r - a u t h o r s [6, 7].
ical indentors from Hertz's formu-
la; [] ) c a l c u l a t e d p o i n t s f o r K - 1 7 - 2 . 50']4 I ~ '
~0} kgf/cmt/l' ~ a Z
T e s t r e s u l t s . F i g u r e 1 p r e s e n t s g r a p h s of the r e -
l a t i o n b e t w e e n p e n e t r a t i o n depth and the l o g a r i t h m of
the t i m e of a p p l i c a t i o n of the l o a d f o r t e s t p i e c e s m a d e
of v a r i o u s m a t e r i a l s . C l e a r l y , in the i n v e s t i g a t e d 2o - 24--~----~- 3o-½
r a n g e of lg t, this r e l a t i o n c a n be d e s c r i b e d by a
f o r m u l a of the f o r m
h = h o + a lg t; (1)
~O 80 t20 O~
w h e r e h 0 is the depth of p e n e t r a t i o n of the b a l l at t =
= 1 rain, a is a c o n s t a n t . The B r i n e l l h a r d n e s s ls F i g . 5. H a r d n e s s HB f o r s p h e r i c a l and
c a l c u l a t e d as follows. H B = N/TrDh, w h e r e N is the c o n i c a l ( c u r v e s d e n o t e d by a) i n d e n t o r s
load, D the d i a m e t e r of the b a l l , and h the p e n e t r a t i o n v e r s u s p e n e t r a t i o n angle: 1, l a ) a m i n o -
depth. Then f o r m u l a (1) m a y be r e w r i t t e n a s follows: p l a s t ; 2 , 2 a ) K - 1 7 - 2 ; 3, 3a) p l e x i g l a s s ;
4, 4a) F K P - 1 ; 5, 5a) PVC; 6, 6a) teflon;
HB(0) =1 --a 7, 7a) p o l y e t h y l e n e .
Hm~) + h o l g t, (2)
The q u e s t i o n of p o l y m e r r h e o l o g y u n d e r the c o n -
w h e r e HB(0) is the h a r d n e s s at t = 1 m i n , and HB(t)
d i t i o n s of the c o n t a c t p r o b l e m w i l l be e x a m i n e d m o r e
the h a r d n e s s a t a p a r t i c u l a r m o m e n t of t i m e .
c l o s e l y in a s e p a r a t e a r t i c l e . In the t e s t s d e s c r i b e d
~K b e l o w the l o a d was a p p l i e d f o r 1 rain. S t r i c t l y s p e a k -
kgf/Cm~O ing, the a b s o l u t e l o a d i n g t i m e should be d i f f e r e n t for
d i f f e r e n t m a t e r i a l s , s i n c e the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c t i m e s ,
e. g . , r e l a x a t i o n t i m e o r r e l a x a t i o n s p e c t r u m , a r e
also different. However, reliable data for determin-
ing t h e s e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s u n d e r the given t e s t c o n d i -
t i o n s w e r e not a v a i l a b l e . F i g u r e 3 g i v e s v a l u e s of
o 2o *OPkgf the r e l a t i v e r e c o v e r y 1 rain a f t e r the r e m o v a l of l o a d
following l o a d i n g f o r 1 rain at d i f f e r e n t Values of the
F i g . 4. H a r d n e s s H B f o r a c o n i c a l p e n e t r a t i o n angle. F o r b a l l s t h i s angle a = 2 a r c cos d / D ;
i n d e n t o r with a cone angle of 90 ° d / D ; for c o n e s a is equal to the cone v e r t e x angle.
v e r s u s load: 1) p t e x i g l a s s ; 2) F K P - The f i g u r e s show v a l u e s of the r e c o v e r y c a l c u l a t e d
1;3) PVC. f r o m the f o r m u l a
m a t e r i a l is n = 2, while for p u r e l y e l a s t i c d e f o r m a -
tion n = 3. Thus the b e h a v i o r of p o l y m e r s in ball i n -
d e n t a t i o n t e s t s , as d i s t i n c t f r o m the b e h a v i o r of m o s t
m e t a l s , is c l o s e r to the b e h a v i o r of m a t e r i a l s that 0 f,:7 ZO 30 ~'0
d e f o r m e l a s t i c a l l y , r a t h e r than p l a s t i c a l l y . At the
indicated v a l u e s of n the r e l a t i o n HM(d/D ) c a n be Fig. 9. Ultimate strength or yield
v i r t u a l l y a p p r o x i m a t e d by a s t r a i g h t l i n e , as follows point in compression versus hard-
f r o m the g r a p h s in Fig. 6, which also shows the ness H B.
s t r a i g h t l i n e s HM(d/D) c a l c u l a t e d f r o m the f o r m u l a
that c a n be obtained f r o m H e r t z ' s f o r m u l a s if it is
We have not b e e n able to o b t a i n solutions of c o n -
a s s u m e d that a plane s u r f a c e is p e n e t r a t e d by a n a b -
t a c t p r o b l e m s using the P r a n d t l - R e u s s e q u a t i o n s ,
s o l u t e l y r i g i d ball:
which take into a c c o u n t the e l a s t i c p a r t of the s t r a i n
d E
Hz = 0.38 ~ _--X-~2.
1 (6) and the c o m p r e s s i b i l i t y of the m a t e r i a l . However, to
e s t i m a t e the l i m i t i n g v a l u e s of the r e s i s t a n c e to d e -
The points of intersection of theselines with the ex- f o r m a t i o n u n d e r t h e s e conditions it is p o s s i b l e to
perimental lines should give the values of the mean employ the s o l u t i o n of e l a s t o p l a s t i c p r o b l e m s on the
stresses and ratios d/D at which transition from e x p a n s i o n of a s p h e r i c a l or c y l i n d r i c a l cavity in an
elastic to plastic or high-elastic strains takes place. infinite body s t a r t i n g f r o m zero d i a m e t e r . T h e r e is
POLYMER MECHANICS 215
Table 1
FKP-I 12.0 2.55 0.77 0.16 0.0~ 23.0 0.87 0,84 2.84 i 2.5 t 0,98
K-l?-2 20,0
24.4
7.0
6,3
0,50
0.58
0,20
0.15
0.0~ 47.5 0.82 0.83 2.80 7.5 1.07
o.o; 60.0 0.86 0.85 22%
86 ~.5 ~.~9
Aminoplast
8.8 4,5 0.65 0.332 0.0, t6.8 0.75 '.).81
PVC
Plexiglass 12,8 8,0 0.69 1.00
0.43 0.0~ 25.0 0,90 O,81 2.72 4.5 0,56 L5 I
Teflon 1.4 1,4 0,39 0.36 0.0: 2.0 0,87 0,75 2.52 [ 0 1,14
Polyethylene 0,4 0.9 0,26 -- 19 0,85 9.83 2.8~ OIaG 0.90
216 MEKHANIKA P O L I M E R O V
Table 2
We note that the h a r d n e s s HB, m e a s u r e d for d / D > 4. F o r p l a s t i c s the value of the exponent n is not
> (d/D)lim, a l s o has a s i n g i e - v a l u e d d e p e n d e n c e on d i r e c t l y r e l a t e d with the p a r a m e t e r s of the or(e) c u r v e
aS, B. The c o r r e s p o n d i n g g r a p h is p r e s e n t e d in Fig. 9. owing to the s t r o n g d e p e n d e n c e of t h e i r m e c h a n i c a l
The equation of this c u r v e is c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s on h y d r o s t a t i c p r e s s u r e in the p r e s -
s u r e r a n g e typical of the c a s e of c o n t a c t loads.
~s.B = 0.87HB°'ga . (1 O)
5. F o r b r i t t l e p l a s t i c s the value of the s t r e s s at
T h u s , to d e t e r m i n e the s t r e n g t h c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s it which t r a n s i t i o n f r o m e l a s t i c to p l a s t i c s t r a i n s o c c u r s
is p o s s i b l e to find the h a r d n e s s I-IM at two loads, c o m - d u r i n g p e n e t r a t i o n is c l o s e r to the u l t i m a t e t e n s i l e
pute the value of E ' f r o m the f o r m u l a E' = (HI"M - s t r e n g t h . C o n s e q u e n t l y , flow b e g i n s at the s u r f a c e of
- H ' M ) / [ ( d / D ) " - (d/D)'] , and find ors,B f r o m the graph the t e s t piece. In the c a s e of ductile m a t e r i a l s flow
in Fig. 8. The graph in Fig. 9 can also be used for a p p a r e n t l y b e g i n s , as with m e t a l s , b e n e a t h the s u r -
this p u r p o s e , a f t e r d e t e r m i n i n g HB for d / D > (d/D)li m. face of the t e s t piece.
The yield point o r t e n s i l e s t r e n g t h c a n be e s t i m a t e d 6. Methods and f o r m u l a s a r e p r o p o s e d for c a l c u l a -
a f t e r d e t e r m i n i n g the point of i n t e r s e c t i o n of the two t i n g s t r e n g t h and e l a s t i c c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s f r o m the data
s t r a i g h t l i n e s HM(d/D) for the e l a s t i c and p l a s t i c r e - of h a r d n e s s m e a s u r e m e n t s and f r o m the data of m e a -
gions in Fig. 6. To plot the graph HM(d/D)e 1 it is n e c - s u r e m e n t s of HM in the e l a s t i c region.
c e s s a r y to know E/(1 - ~2); this quantity can also be
d e t e r m i n e d f r o m p e n e t r a t i o n t e s t s . Indeed, H e r t z ' s REFERENCES
f o r m u l a for the p e n e t r a t i o n of an a b s o l u t e l y r i g i d b a i l
1. A. D. K u r i t s y n a and P. G. M e i n s t e r , in c o l -
into a ptane is w r i t t e n : d / D = 2.62 (1 - u2)Crmean/E.
l e c t i o n : P l a s t i c s as A n t i f r i c t i o n M a t e r i a l s [in R u s s i a n ] ,
If we take Crmean/E = 0.02, t h e n for a l l m a t e r i a l s we
Moscow, 5, 1961.
will be in the e l a s t i c r e g i o n . If u = 0.33, d / D = 0.047.
2. A. D. K u r i t s y n a and P. G. M e i n s t e r , in c o l -
If we take D = 50 ram, then d -~ 2.5 ram, and the
l e c t i o n : P I a s t i c s in Sliding B e a r i n g s [in R u s s i a n ] ,
depth of the i n d e n t a t i o n h ~= 0.12 ram. Both t h e s e q u a n t -
Moscow, 57, 1965.
tries a r e e a s y to m e a s u r e , s i n c e they a r e quite l a r g e ;
3. I. F. K a n a v e t s and L. G. Batalova, P l a s t .
then
m a s s y , 2, 64, 1960.
E D 4. V. P. Shubin and V. I. Nikitina, Izv. VUZ.
l - v T = 2 . 6 2 o lira ~-- (11 ) Ser. m a s h i n o s t r . , 7, 62, 1963.
5. V. I. Egiz, P l a s t . m a s s y , 4, 57, 1961.
or, s i n c e d 2 = Dh, 6. P. P. Kobeko, A m o r p h o u s S u b s t a n c e s [in R u s -
sian], Moscow, 1952.
E 2 1/ D 7. I, M a r i n , T r a n s , ASME, 74, 1231, 1952.
=2.6 OlimV -~[. (12)
8. D. T a b o r , The H a r d n e s s of M e t a l s , C l a r e n d o n
O b v i o u s l y , for m e a s u r i n g the e l a s t i c p r o p e r t i e s it is P r e s s , Oxford 1951.
p o s s i b l e to u s e not a ball, but a s e g m e n t of c o r r e s - 9. N. M. Balyaev, in collection: L e n i n g r a d s k . i n - i n
ponding r a d i u s . i n z h e n e r o v putei s o o b s h c h e n i y a , L e n i n g r a d , 99, 1929.
T h u s , u s i n g f o r m u l a s (9)-(12) o r the c o r r e s p o n d i n g 10. A. N. Dinnik, Selected Works, 1 [in R u s s i a n ] ,
g r a p h s , with the aid of the r e s u l t s of h a r d n e s s m e a - Kiev, 201, 1944.
s u r e m e n t s we can d e t e r m i n e s o m e of the i m p o r t a n t 11. A. Yu. I s h l i n s k i i , PMM, 3, 201, 1944.
m e c h a n i c a l and e l a s t i c p r o p e r t i e s of p l a s t i c s . 12. R. Hill, M a t h e m a t i c a l T h e o r y of P l a s t i c i t y
[ R u s s i a n t r a n s l a t i o n ] , Gostekhizdat, 1956.
SUMMARY 13. S. B. A i n b i n d e r , Izv. AN LatvSSR, 7, 92, 1953.
14. S. B. A i n b i n d e r , M. G. Laka, I. Yu. M a i o r s ,
1. When p l a s t i c s d e f o r m u n d e r c o n t a c t s t r e s s c o n - Mekh. polim. [ P o l y m e r M e c h a n i c s ] , 1, 65, 1965.
d i t i o n s , the s t r e s s and s t r a i n depend l i n e a r l y on the 15. I. Ya. S h t a e r m a n , The Contact P r o b l e m of
l o g a r i t h m of the l o a d i n g t i m e . the T h e o r y of E l a s t i c i t y [in R u s s i a n ] , Gostekhizdat,
2. In the e a s e of low r e c o v e r y r a t e s the e l a s t i c
1949.
r e c o v e r y after r e m o v a l of load can be c a l c u l a t e d f r o m
Hertz~s f o r m u l a s .
3. When ball i n d e n t o r s a r e used, the h a r d n e s s of
p l a s t i c s should be m e a s u r e d at d / D _ 0.8 f r o m the
depth or d i a m e t e r of the u n r e e o v e r e d indentation.
When a p y r a m i d or cone is employed, the v e r t e x angle
should be 60°-65 °. If the r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s of the ex- 31 D e c e m b e r 1965 I n s t i t u t e of P o l y m e r
i s t i n g Soviet s t a n d a r d a r e followed, the h a r d n e s s will M e c h a n i c s AS L a t v i a n
depend on the load. SSR, Riga