Methodology and Practice of Community Development
Methodology and Practice of Community Development
1.- The different scopes with which the concept of community is used.
The term community is one of the most used concepts in the social sciences.
referring to very diverse realities. In its original acceptance, the term
"community" referred to a spatial area of relatively dimensions
reduced and in its broad sense the word denotes the quality of common, or the possession
about something in common, it is about something shared, depending on what is shared
There will be different scopes of the word.
Sometimes the term is used to refer to a small group of people who live together.
with some common purpose or to refer to a neighborhood, town, village, or municipality.
When we talk about community, we talk about a defined space or territory and about the
people and relationships that are established among those who live there. It is also referred to as
group of people who share a common social heritage such as traditions,
language, custom or ethnicity and finally they refer to feelings or awareness of
similarity and belonging, which is what makes people feel part of the group.
In other cases, the concept refers to social relationships and an autonomous functional entity.
last included in the economic activities of production, distribution, and consumption; the
availability of certain resources, goods, and services; the institutions, roles, status
and social classes that exist within it.
The forms of interaction, relationships, and common ties create a collective identification.
(sense or consciousness of belonging).
In a strict sense, development and underdevelopment is a phenomenon that began around 1750.
when the industrial revolution and capitalism converge forming part of the same
process. Since the development began to come to the forefront of current events,
served to provide exquisite themes to international organizations, colloquiums
scientists and cultural conferences, underdevelopment has also allowed some
personalities discover their vocation as experts. It is not enough to study the problems and
needs that people have must be addressed with actions and activities
concrete actions that lead to the solution of those problems and to the satisfaction of those
needs.
In the 1960s, the issue of development and underdevelopment constitutes one of the
major concerns of the countries.
Henrique Cardoso said that 'development as a practice and as an ideology constitutes the
the ultimate challenge of the Latin American man.
Upon reaching this concept, a series of clarifications have been introduced as development.
integral and harmonic, the unified development, the other development, to reach the current idea
of sustainable development. The last four expressions used by schools of
economics and humanism, Ilpes, the proposal of the Hammarskjold report and the latest one that
is put into circulation by the global commission on environment and development.
As the idea of the development of the current development concept began to take shape, it had a
meaning and scope much narrower.
Although much less is said today about development, the current conception is closer to
style and the spirit that has always prevailed in the development of the community.
There is a long tradition of mutual aid and community action that has existed since
humanity exists, from the family. The tribe, religious communities, mutuals of
unions until reaching the welfare and assistance state. It has been 50 years since the development of
the community is promoted by the governments by giving a scientific and technological approach to
the natural forms of solidarity of the communities that is becoming more and more
impersonal, complex, and external.
2.- Organization and development of the community: similar methodological procedures that
they evolved separately.
The development of the community as a form of social intervention is the result of two
separate methodological processes to provide answers to different problems but
that are essentially similar. The organization of the community arose within the
The profession of social work and its main evolution took place in the United States. The development
from the community arises later in Africa and Asia where it is born and develops expanding
after to Latin America and Europe. The term community development is used to
describe the efforts to help communities in less developed countries and
the term community organization to plan welfare services for the
communities of industrialized countries (Murray Ross).
It originated as a method of social work in the United States, and its background was given to
to know in certain activities of the COS (Charity Organization Societies)
a. From inter-group action to community planning councils: this method
arises from the cooperation and coordination of aid agencies and social work to
to carry out a type of group action that transcends individuals, family, and groups
acquiring a collective and community profile.
Lindeman in 1920 was one of the first to use the term organization of the
community to designate the 'community organization phase to control its
problems and achieve better services from the institutions.
Pettit in 1925 referred to the organization of the community as 'a form of help.'
social to a group of people to recognize and resolve their common needs.
Starting from the 1929 crisis, public services are created and techniques are introduced.
planning to solve social problems at the community level, here the development
of the community has a greater significance and social workers have more
importance in local councils.
The changes in American society as a result of urban and industrial growth brought
a large number of European immigrants bringing with them all the problems
that growth generates. To address this issue, the councils arise from
community planning also known as 'councils for the well-being of the
community", to coordinate activities of the different groups and institutions that
They operated at a local level.
b. The Lane report: Robert P. Lane presented that report (The field of community
the NAWS in 1939 was one of the most important contributions to the work
social in this subject. The most important characteristics are:
It is carried out both in the spheres of social work and outside of it.
d. The principles of community organization: the maturation process took place in the
the 1950s with McNeil's work, in which 7 principles were formulated:
It is a method of social intervention, in which resources and needs go hand in hand.
(this method is still in effect today).
The organization of the community is part of the generic process of social work.
The NAWS synthesized the specific objectives of the community organization method.
in 3 questions:
1.- Provide the community with resources to solve or prevent social problems.
a. Offering citizens means to mobilize, express themselves, and confront
responsibilities of social welfare.
c. Influence on social welfare policies and other direct or indirect public policies
with the well-being of the people.
The self-development of the community has a meaning that the changes do not have.
taxes.
The expression 'community development' was put into circulation by the office of
British colonies, to designate the social action program. According to the Colonial Office,
it was a promotional movement that was to start in order to prepare for their emancipation. The
scheduled actions were aimed at educational: literacy, training
labor, etc.; aimed at improving the work of industries, these projects were actions
sent to introject the values of the imperial system into the colonized
functions according to guidelines and values. The professionals of thought
progressive and committed to popular sectors resisted development
community.
The first national community development programs
They promote the active participation of the population to meet the needs of the
community. In India, it started in 1952 in 55 experimental project areas encompassing
25,264 villages with 16,400,000 inhabitants. In 1963 they will encompass the entire country. At the end of the
The First Biweekly Plan had already reached 122,957 villages and almost 80,000,000 inhabitants.
Here the first Ministry of Community Development was formed, which operated at
through 3 institutions: The Panchayat (communal council) that operated as an organization
civic. The Cooperative operated in the economic sphere. The Village School whose
The intervention encompassed education and culture.
In 1948, Ceylon inaugurated a rural development program, its purpose was to stimulate the
efforts of the rural population and promote village organizations. It was channeled
"rural development societies" who undertook the execution of development works,
The government provided them with the services of officials who contributed knowledge.
specialized. The sectors of activity focused on 3 aspects: economic, health
and cultural-educational.
In 1954, Pakistan was the first to implement this program in the urban area;
The experimental project was used in Lyari, a slum housing neighborhood in Karachi.
According to the officials of the program promotion, it allows projects that are
They start not to be costly and that the services provided benefit many people.
C. The development of the community as an instrument of the social process
In the early years of initiation, they were called communal centers and projects.
specifics:
Material improvements - Organization of services - Community action
The United Nations developed a report titled 'social progress through the
community development" which indicates that the policy is in the stage of
formulation and experimentation, aimed at creating conditions for economic progress and
social to the community. This document also makes a balance distinguishing 6 types:
Execution of works: the case of Greece, through the social welfare program
through employment.
These projects do not constitute a form of community action; rather, the essence of
community development is not so much about what is done but about how it is done and the
people's participation.
D. The Magna Carta of community development
In 1956, groups of experts from the United Nations systematized the different experiences and
produce a document 'community development and related services' explain the
meaning and application of this social technique. Considering this document as the
"Magna Carta of community development" whose definition for many years has reached
being classic, implying that the development of the community was incorporated to
design those processes where the efforts of a population are combined with those of their
government to improve the economic, social, and cultural conditions of the
communities, integrate the life of the country and allow them to contribute to national progress. This was
the first definition proposed by the United Nations as an exclusive action of the
governments. NGOs became very important in most of the programs in the
last 30 years promoted by these institutions.
Another document they publish is the Community Development and Economic Development
in 1960 in Bangkok whose purpose is a balance of the contribution of the programs
rural development of the community in the territory of Asia and the Far East considering
the financial contributions.
F. The proposal that community development be part of the plans of
national development.
It was a stage of promotion and momentum where the United Nations system culminates it.
with a document published by the UN in 1963 Community Development and Development
National. It was the great proposal whose idea of development was not just growth.
economic but also as evolution, the need for development is raised
the community takes on a real leading role in national development, having a great
incidence in Latin America. This document contains 4 contributions from
community development to national development:
1.- Economic and social growth at the local and rural level, bringing it out of its isolation.
improving communications and helping your organization.
2.- Channel for communication between the government and the population, the communities
they can influence development plans and this in the communities.
3.- Contributes to the formation of social capital or the expansion of rural infrastructure,
liberating government resources to national investments.
4.- Create necessary conditions for the evolution of local government bodies or
strengthening rural institutions that are lagging behind or poorly adapted to the new ones
circumstances.
Here are pointed out 2 special requirements to link the development of the community to the
national planning.
The term community development fell out of use starting in the 1980s in the
United Nations and international organizations after the proposal of the General of the
UN Dag Hammarskjold stating that community development should be the pillar of
the social policy of the united nations.
5.- Gestation and evolution of community development in the Latin American reality.
In 1950, a seminar was held by the NGO in the Republic of El Salvador where it was proposed
the definition of this method 'Technique used by social work to elicit the
participation of the members of an area or community in a company of
individual improvement and collective progress regarding one's own resources." In 1949 the
The social affairs division of the Pan American Union promotes 3 seminars.
regional social affairs contributing to the launch of the development of the
community in Latin America four issues were addressed: Cooperatives, Social Service,
Housing and Workers' Education Planning.
The books of the American social worker Caroline Ware are significant in the
communal development in Latin America, those published in the Pan American Union in
1952 Study of the community and in Puerto Rico in 1954 Organization of the community
for social welfare
CHAPTER 3: MEANING AND SCOPE OF THE CONCEPT AND PRACTICE OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE
COMMUNITY.
In the short time that this expression has been used, it has had different meanings.
in several countries. A varied framework of specific projects and concrete activities
they are the multiple and diverse expressions of the so-called community development.
highlights
It is characterized more by an attitude than by the substance of a program. What matters
it is the way of undertaking the work rather than the nature of the work itself (the
participation of the same people.
Both on the maternal side and the paternal side, there are other ancestors. Continuing
with Sanders' metaphor, we can say that on the paternal side the relatives
collaterals are planning, urbanism, and agrarian reform and on the maternal side the
organization of the community and how predecessors social work and education
adults. Social work, in turn, descends into charitable and youth organizations,
channeled recreational activities and has influenced social legislation and organization
of social welfare. Adult education contributes to educational activities
for health.
The expression community development has been used with 4 different scopes:
As a method of social intervention.
As a program.
As an induced process.
As a movement.
However, the expression has almost always been used in the first 2 contexts:
community development developed as a method and program.
2.- The development of the community as a method of social intervention.-
Considered as a method of action on reality, community development.
it is a form of social intervention in which there is a set of rules and
procedures that apply theoretical knowledge in the sciences
social and psychology translates into a series of actions and activities, through them
it aims to modify or transform some aspect of social reality, seeking
specific results expressed in pre-established goals and objectives.
The development of the community aims at promotion and mobilization of
human and institutional resources through the active and democratic participation of the
population, in everything that has to do with improving the level and quality of life. In what
it means about its operational modalities, it is not so much like an action on the
community, if not an action of the community which deals with efforts and actions with
the same initiative and direction of the entity involved in the program, although for its
takeoff may have needed the action of eternal agents and during their development
require different forms of technical assistance.
Acts at the psychosocial level through a process of awareness and motivation that
unfolds virtues and develops potential in individuals, groups, or communities
to improve their living conditions.
These phases are carried out by the same people involved in the program. The attitude with
that the projects are carried out and the way to undertake the work is more
more important than the material content of them. This identification criterion
allows to establish when an activity effectively promotes the development of a
community. It is not what is done but how it is done, that constitutes the substance of
community development. There is community development when promoting and
human resources are mobilized through an educational/awareness process. Of this
the way the idea and practice of people's participation ultimately becomes the concept
central to the theory and practice of its development.
This has been applied to different fields (to social action methodologies) like
ways to overcome analytical-mechanical approaches. The aim is to formulate
each project and the set of activities, so that each one supports the
others, integrating and complementing different lines or fronts of action. The application
from a systemic approach in the implementation of community development programs is
still a pending issue.
What seeks the active participation of all the people involved or interested in
the actions that are being taken.
In other words, the synergistic system is a system of action that articulates and coordinates each of the
activities and specific tasks in such a way that it produces a feedback effect and
the strengthening of each of them, this effect is considered collective action, it allows
achieve a superior result in quantity and quality.
Synergy is a natural process that nurtures and manages a social organism through its
self-organization is more than the sum of actions and their products or results, it occurs
an increase in energy called synergy.
Synergy is the catalyst element in the case of social actions and seeks
achieve certain objectives, meet needs and/or solve problems. The effect
synergy can only be achieved at a microsocial scale.
1.- the great mirage: that the development of the community was an essential part of the plans
global development.
The development of the community was meant to serve as a means to articulate planning and
national development would be achieved by implementing macroeconomic goals at the local level
that will aid in the formulation of national plans, bringing them to the central office
the planning of projects at the local level.
This was a mirage because the municipalities and grassroots communities could only
effectively contribute to development plans, to achieve this it would have been necessary to exist
a high degree of democratization of political life and significant development of the
grassroots organizations. The social policy that
it tended to be a participatory and efficient system, but it was not.
2.- the false assumptions on which many community action programs were based.-
In a critical review of community development, two errors were found.
derived from incorrect assumptions, which are referred to as follows:
a. To consider communities as if they were homogeneous realities with interests
shared: community action activities were frequently organized,
assuming that they were all homogeneous and forgot that there was diversity of
individuals, groups, organizations, and networks with a wide variety of ways of acting and
different interests. Hence, the need to consider the preparation of the diagnosis.
and establish action strategies, objectives, and more achievable goals.
c. The development of the community as a mechanism of social change this development does not
it has always been an instrument of change, if not, it is a model to reproduce and consolidate it
existing e.g. Improve crops, better organization of a cooperative and better
utilization of human resources.
4.- The key ideas of community development that have remained over time.
half a century
Improve the economic, social, and cultural conditions of the communities, integrate
you are in the life of the country and allow them to fully contribute to national progress. The idea
Central to community development has been the participation and mobilization of the
human resources, that is, for people to work together on projects, activities and
actions that serve to improve the quality of life.
This was a basic principle of the 60s, currently the premises and axioms that
Underlying community development methodologies have changed.
Community development is now seen as a way to raise awareness and motivate people.
people to participate in the solution of their own problems.
People have the feeling that within large organizations they cannot do
nothing, but it is possible to participate effectively at the local level, actions must
take place where the people are (Situation-Problem).
Improve the living conditions of a population through their participation (of the people,
central idea of community development), within an inseparable process of the sector
municipal and strengthening of the local institution, the emergence of non
governmental, social media with proposals for social policies.
Local action serves as the basis for a new instrument of political management, a
institutional mechanism that closely links the State and Civil Society,
autonomous local governments, administrative decentralization, and participation
citizen.
The limitations of local development.
Local development in the context of the globalization process, on the one hand, is
homogenizing and another asymmetric. Some globalize and others do not globalize aspects
negatives can stop worrying about global problems. We must act
think globally but act locally.
3.- The process of decentralization, the new possibilities of municipal action and the
community development.
The municipal level is the administrative structure and territorial scope most suitable.
to promote development processes from micro social spaces, developing
up to a macro-social level (provincial, regional, and national) but not everything that is done
at the local level is carried out through municipal action and it should not be
consider local/community issues in a self-taught manner, they are
conditioned by what happens in broader and wider contexts than the scope
municipal.
We must move towards the 'decentralization of decentralization.' This means
that when municipalities exceed certain dimensions in terms of number of
inhabitants or have dispersed populations, must decentralize the organs in the places
closer to the same people. Vital proximity and conviviality are necessary for
the participation of the people is made possible.
The emergence of these new social actors, whether they are movements or associations
Social networks also pose a challenge to operational forms of the
local administration, which must incorporate as an essential part of the aspects
organizational and functional aspects of the municipality, everything related to participation
citizen.
The initiative of the grassroots NGO expresses practically that participation
citizenship is a right not an obligation. Consequently, it is undoubted that the
local administration and community action programs must have some type of
relations, coordination, articulation with all these organizations. These relations
they must be carried out on a basis of reciprocal autonomy. Neither the NGO should be subordinated,
manipulated or subsumed by the local administration, nor should it be at the mercy of
these organizations. For a proper articulation, two conditions should be met.
previous ones that are no less important for being obvious, when this does not exist, we work with
greater limitations.
Social networks
From these two areas, it is necessary to promote relationships of dialogue and cooperation.
It is evident from them that the development of the community and the dynamization of the
citizen participation are 2 inseparable concepts:
The Latin American and Caribbean Institute for Economic and Social Planning
Non-governmental organization