Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views23 pages

ROB22 Compressed

Uploaded by

rushi123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views23 pages

ROB22 Compressed

Uploaded by

rushi123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Signature Not

Verified
Digitally signed by
INDRAJEET VERMA
Date: 2025.05.27
12:57:30 IST
Reason: IREPS-CRIS
Location: New Delhi
NAME OF WORK: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND DESIGNING OF
STRUCTURES FOR REWA-SIDHI-SINGRAULI NEW B.G
RAILWAY LINE PROJECT.

WEST CENTRAL RAILWAY

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT


ROB NO.22 AT CH: 155+500 km

SUBMITTED TO,
Dy. Chief Engineer (Const.)
West Central Railway,
Sidhi, MP

RAJESH Digitally
by RAJESH
signed
AVINAS Digitally signed
Digitally signed
KUMAR KUMAR
Date:
GUPTA
H
by AVINASH
KUMAR ABLISH byKUMAR
ABLISH

GUPTA 2025.05.26
16:42:34 +05'30'
Date: 2025.05.26
KUMAR 16:43:09 +05'30' KUMA Date:
2025.05.26
R 18:53:48
+05'30'
Project Name Geotechnical Investigation and Designing of Structures for Rewa Sidhi
Singrauli New B.G Line. Part A: Engineering Survey for Technical
Investigation and Designing of Structure (Tunnels, Viaduct, Bridges,
Buildings etc.) in Connection with Sidhi Singrauli New BG Rail Line Project
which mainly includes i) Hydrological Survey, Waterway Calculation,
Geotech Investigation for bridges, ii) Geological Mapping, Geo Physical
Survey, Seismic refraction Survey etc. for Tunnel & Viaducts, iii) Geo
Technical Investigations for formation, iv) Planning and Design of Bridges,
Viaducts & other structures and v) Preparation of Various Plans, Drawings,
Detail Cost estimate, EIA Study and other ancillary works etc.
Part B: Design & Drawings including Proof Checking of Major Bridges and
ROBs between Kms 20.15 to 88.75 in the Govindgarh Sidhi section.
Doc No. BICPL/WCR/GT/155+500KM Date of Issue 17/03/2025
Geotechnical investigation report for ROB-22 at CH: 155+500 between
Doc Title Sidhi-Singrauli section in connection with Rewa-Sidhi-Singrauli new B.G
rail line project.
Date of
Rev Changes Prepared Reviewed
Issue/ Description Approved by
No made by by
Revision
Saurabh Mr. Ranjith
R0 17/03/2025 Mr. Vijay Ingole
Singh Soman

Prepared by Name: Saurabh Singh Signature

Reviewed by Name: Mr. Vijay Ingole Signature

Approved by Name: Mr. Ranjith Soman Signature


BORELOG SHEET
DAILY DRILLING PROGRESS REPORT
Name of project: Rewa - Sidhi - Singrauli New B.G Line Project
Name of client: W.C. Railway
Name of contractor: Beaver Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd
CO-ORDINATE: N = 2684954.119 E =645957.081 RL: 365.069 m LOCATION : ROB NO.-22 BH-01 CHAINAGE: 155/500 WT- m

Time Depth SAMPLE & TEST IN SITU Remarks


Net Working Depth of Cumulative Thickness of
Boring Stop Soil/Rock
Date Hours on Boring on Depth of Lithology Soil Stratum
Due to Starting classification Depth from SPT 15/30/45
Total Core Core Core
Starting Ending date Ending (m) date (m) Boring (m) and legend ground Type Length (in Recovery Length RQD %
(m) (N) Value
surface (m) cm) % >=0.1 m

0.00 1.50 CI 1.50 SPT 11/13/16,N=29 NIL NIL NIL NIL


Greyish to brownish
1.50 3.00 Silty clay with minor CI 3.00 SPT 14/15/18,N=33 NIL NIL NIL NIL
8 Hours 00
31-01-2025 6:00 AM 6:30 PM Darkness 6.00 6.00 amount of gravel
Mins
3.00 4.50 CI 4.50 SPT 17/20/24,N=44 NIL NIL NIL NIL

4.50 6.00 Rock 6.00 RB NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

6.00 7.50 Rock 7.50 RB NIL 22.00 14.67 NIL NIL


7 Hours 30
01-02-2025 7:30 AM 6:00 PM Darkness 7.50 9.00 4.50 10.50 Rock 9.00 RB NIL 17.00 11.33 NIL NIL
Mins
9.00 10.50 Rock 10.50 RB NIL 20.00 13.33 NIL NIL

10.50 12.00 Greyish to blackish, fine Rock 12.00 RB NIL 50.00 33.33 NIL NIL
grained, highly to
7 Hours 50
02-02-2025 6:30 AM 5:00 PM Darkness 12.00 13.50 4.50 15.00 moderately weathered Rock 13.50 ROCK NIL 55.00 36.67 10.00 6.67
Mins
and fracture
13.50 15.00 carbonaceous phyllite Rock 15.00 ROCK NIL 62.00 41.33 25.00 16.67

15.00 16.50 Rock 16.50 ROCK NIL 30.00 20.00 NIL NIL

16.50 18.00 Rock 18.00 ROCK NIL 85.00 56.67 46.00 30.67
Borehole 8 Hours 10
03-02-2025 6:30 AM 6:30 PM 5.00 20.00
terminated Mins
18.00 19.50 Rock 19.50 ROCK NIL 62.00 41.33 58.00 38.67

19.50 20.00 Rock 20.00 ROCK NIL 46.00 30.67 42.00 28.00
LAB TEST RESULT

Laboratory Test Result for Soil Sample


Name of Project : Rewa ,Sidhi & Singrauli New B.G Line Project
Client: W.C. Railway
Submitted By: M/s Beaver Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd

Atterberg Limit Grain Size Analysis Shear Parameter

Moisture Bulk Specific Lithology Soil Classification


Sr. Chainage in Dry Densty Plastic Plasticity Angle of Consolidation
Location BH NO Depth in (M) Content Density Liquid Gravity Cohesion ('c')
No (M) (gm/cc) Limit Index (IP) Gravel (G) Sand (S) Silt (M) Clay (F) Friction Cm2/min
Wo (%) (gm/cc) limit (WL) (Go) Kg/cm 2
(%) (WP) (%) (%) (Ø) degree

1 0.00-1.50 9.76 1.57 1.72 45.31 24.10 21.21 2.61 0.54 12.21 53.94 33.31 0.580 10.27 -- CI
Greyish to brownish Silty clay
2 ROB-22 155500 M 1 1.50-3.00 10.22 1.58 1.74 42.86 24.16 18.70 2.64 1.04 13.64 53.47 31.85 0.410 11.64 -- CI
with minor amount of gravel
3 3.00-4.50 9.28 1.62 1.77 40.43 23.38 17.05 2.65 0.67 15.02 52.07 32.24 0.490 12.35 -- CI
Laboratory Test Result for Rock Sample
Name of Project :Rewa ,Sidhi & Singrauli New B.G Line Project

Client: W.C. Railway

Submitted By: M/s Beaver Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd

Test On Rock

Water Point Load


Sr. Dry Density Specific UCS
Location Chainage (M) BH NO Depth (M) Type absorption Porosity Index
No gm/cc Gravity (Mpa)
(WA) % (Mpa)

1 4.50-7.50 -- -- -- -- -- --
2 7.50-10.50 Greyish to blackish, fine 2.31 0.86 2.30 1.99 -- 0.89
3 10.50-13.50 grained, highly to 2.38 0.74 2.39 1.76 -- 1.22
ROB-22 155500 M 1 moderately weathered and
4 13.50-16.50 fracture carbonaceous 2.44 0.59 2.44 1.44 44.67 2.14
5 16.50-19.50 phyllite 2.68 0.29 2.67 0.78 55.27 2.49
6 19.50-20.00 2.70 0.24 2.69 0.65 60.18 3.04
Geotechnical Test Results for Soil Samples
DETERMINATION OF WATER CONTENT IS : 2720 (Part 2) -1973

Wt. of Wt. of Wt. of Water content,


Wt. of Wt. of dry soil
Container container container moisture in %, w =
SL. No. Location Chainage BH No. Depth container (W3-W1), in
number and wet soil and dry soil (W2-W3), (W2-W3)*
W1, in gm gm
W2, in gm W3, in gm in gm 100/(W3-W1)

Sampling Date 08-02-2025 Testing Date 09-02-2025


(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
1 0.00-1.50 11 15.76 30.15 28.87 13.11 1.28 9.76
2 ROB-22 155500 M 1 1.50-3.00 15 15.72 32.00 30.49 14.77 1.51 10.22
3 3.00-4.50 16 19.24 38.19 36.58 17.34 1.61 9.28

Geotechnical Test Results for Soil Samples


DETERMINATION OF BULK DENSITY OF SOIL

Avg. 6. Bulk
Avg. dia. Volume of Weight of
Chainage in length of density of
Sl No Location BH No Depth of sample sample, in sample, in
M sample sample, in
in cm Cm3 gm
in cm gm/Cm3

1 0.00-1.50 6.24 3.50 60.04 103.46 1.72


2 ROB-22 155500 M 1 1.50-3.00 6.09 3.50 58.59 102.04 1.74
3 3.00-4.50 6.13 3.50 58.98 104.41 1.77
Geotechnical Test Results for Soil Samples
DETERMINATION OF SP. GRAVITY OF SOIL IS : 2720 (Part 3) -1973

Wt. of density
Wt. of empty Wt. of density Wt. of density
Bottle bottle + soil Sp. Gravity= (2-
Sl No Location Chainage BH No Depth density bottle bottle + soil bottle + full of
no sample + water 1)/(4-1)-(3-2)
gm (1) sample gm (2) water gm (4)
gm (3)

Sampling Date:- 08-02-2025 Testing Date:- 09-02-2025


1 0.00-1.50 1 37.18 54.12 147.13 136.68 2.61
2 ROB-22 155500 M 1 1.50-3.00 2 45.36 63.93 156.40 144.86 2.64
3 3.00-4.50 3 46.08 64.07 156.46 145.26 2.65
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS OF PARTICAL SIZE IN BETWEEN 10 mm AND 1- MICRON (Wet/Dry Sieving) IS :
2720 (Part 4) -1985

Wt of partial
sample taken for 50.07 gm Chainage- 155500 M BH- 1 Depth in m: 1.50
analysis-

Location - ROB-22 Sampling Date- 08-02-2025 Testing Date- 10-02-2025

Clasifications IS Sieve Wt. of Soil Cum mass of Percentage Soil passing


retained in gm soil retained of soil as percentage
in gm retained %
10.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
Gravel
4.750 0.27 0.27 0.54 99.46
2.000 1.17 1.44 2.88 97.12
Sand 0.425 1.74 3.18 6.35 93.65
0.075 3.20 6.38 12.75 87.25
Silt 0.002 27.01 33.39 66.69 33.31
Clay 0.001 16.68 50.07 100.00 0.00

CLAY AND SILT Gravel


Grain Size Distribution Curve
120.00
110.00 99.46 100.00
97.12
Percentage of weight of soil passing

100.00 93.65
87.25
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00 33.31
30.00
20.00
10.00 0.00
0.00
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000
Grain Size (mm)

Gravel (Retain on 4.75 mm) = 0.54 %


Sand (Passing on 4.75 and retain on 0.075 mm) = 12.21 %
Silt (From 0.075>silt>=0.002 mm) = 53.94 %
Clay (clay < 0.002 ) = 33.31 %
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS OF PARTICAL SIZE IN BETWEEN 10 mm AND 1- MICRON (Wet/Dry Sieving) IS :
2720 (Part 4) -1985

Wt of partial
sample taken for 50.16 gm Chainage- 155500 M BH- 1 Depth in m: 3.00
analysis-

Location - ROB-22 Sampling Date- 08-02-2025 Testing Date- 10-02-2025

Clasifications IS Sieve Wt. of Soil Cum mass of Percentage Soil passing


retained in gm soil retained of soil as percentage
in gm retained %
10.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
Gravel
4.750 0.52 0.52 1.04 98.96
2.000 0.85 1.37 2.73 97.27
Sand 0.425 2.59 3.96 7.89 92.11
0.075 3.41 7.36 14.68 85.32
Silt 0.002 26.82 34.18 68.15 31.85
Clay 0.001 15.98 50.16 100.00 0.00

CLAY AND SILT Gravel


Grain Size Distribution Curve
120.00
110.00 98.96 100.00
97.27
Percentage of weight of soil passing

100.00 92.11
85.32
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00 31.85
30.00
20.00
10.00 0.00
0.00
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000
Grain Size (mm)

Gravel (Retain on 4.75 mm) = 1.04 %


Sand (Passing on 4.75 and retain on 0.075 mm) = 13.64 %
Silt (From 0.075>silt>=0.002 mm) = 53.47 %
Clay (clay < 0.002 ) = 31.85 %
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS OF PARTICAL SIZE IN BETWEEN 10 mm AND 1- MICRON (Wet/Dry Sieving) IS :
2720 (Part 4) -1985

Wt of partial
sample taken for 50.34 gm Chainage- 155500 M BH- 1 Depth in m: 4.50
analysis-

Location - ROB-22 Sampling Date- 08-02-2025 Testing Date- 10-02-2025

Clasifications IS Sieve Wt. of Soil Cum mass of Percentage Soil passing


retained in gm soil retained of soil as percentage
in gm retained %
10.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
Gravel
4.750 0.34 0.34 0.67 99.33
2.000 1.39 1.73 3.44 96.56
Sand 0.425 2.40 4.13 8.21 91.79
0.075 3.77 7.90 15.69 84.31
Silt 0.002 26.21 34.11 67.76 32.24
Clay 0.001 16.23 50.34 100.00 0.00

CLAY AND SILT Gravel


Grain Size Distribution Curve
120.00
110.00 99.33 100.00
96.56
Percentage of weight of soil passing

100.00 91.79
90.00 84.31

80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00 32.24
30.00
20.00
10.00 0.00
0.00
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000
Grain Size (mm)

Gravel (Retain on 4.75 mm) = 0.67 %


Sand (Passing on 4.75 and retain on 0.075 mm) = 15.02 %
Silt (From 0.075>silt>=0.002 mm) = 52.07 %
Clay (clay < 0.002 ) = 32.24 %
DETERMINATION OF LIQUID LIMIT AND PLASTIC LIMIT IS : 2720 (Part 5) - 1985

Location : ROB-22 Chainage :155500 M BH : 1 Depth in M: 1.50

Sampling Date: 08-02-2025 Date of testing: 10-02-2025


LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT
Determination Number 1 2 3 4 1 2
Number of drops 34 29 24 19
Container number 12 11 10 9 0 8 6
Wt. of container + wet soil, gm 33.98 27.33 26.66 25.68 34.34 22.76
Wt. of container + oven dry soil, gm
30.86 23.78 23.39 22.17 32.54 21.06
weight of water, gm 3.12 3.55 3.27 3.51 1.80 1.70
Weight of container, gm 23.59 15.76 16.22 14.68 24.86 14.19
weight of oven dry soil, gm 7.27 8.02 7.17 7.49 7.68 6.87
Moister content, % 42.92 44.26 45.61 46.86 23.44 24.75
Liquid limit at 25 no of drops: 45.31 Plastic limit: 24.095

Liquid Limit Graph y = -0.2634x + 51.893


Plasticity Chart
48.00 60

47.00 50
CL CH
CI
Moisture Content in %

40

Plasticity Index
46.00

30
45.00
20
44.00 MH-OH
10
MI-OI
43.00 CL-ML
ML-OL
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
42.00
1 10 100 Lquid Limit
No of Blow s

Soil Clasification CI

DETERMINATION OF LIQUID LIMIT AND PLASTIC LIMIT IS : 2720 (Part 5) - 1985

Location : ROB-22 Chainage :155500 M BH : 1 Depth in M: 3.00

Sampling Date: 08-02-2025 Date of testing: 10-02-2025


LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT
Determination Number 1 2 3 4 1 2
Number of drops 33 28 23 18
Container number 7 5 4 3 0 2 1
Wt. of container + wet soil, gm 25.29 31.04 25.97 26.18 28.76 34.84
Wt. of container + oven dry soil, gm
22.28 27.74 22.86 22.75 27.00 33.02
weight of water, gm 3.01 3.30 3.11 3.43 1.76 1.82
Weight of container, gm 14.90 19.90 15.69 15.07 19.55 25.65
weight of oven dry soil, gm 7.38 7.84 7.17 7.68 7.45 7.37
Moister content, % 40.79 42.09 43.38 44.66 23.62 24.69
Liquid limit at 25 no of drops: 42.86 Plastic limit: 24.155

Liquid Limit Graph y = -0.258x + 49.309 Plasticity Chart


45.00 60
44.50
50
44.00 CL
CI CH
Plasticity Index

40
Moisture Content in %

43.50

43.00
30
42.50
20
42.00 MH-OH
41.50 10
MI-OI
CL-ML
41.00 ML-OL
0
40.50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
40.00 Lquid Limit
1 10 100
No of Blow s
Soil Clasification CI
DETERMINATION OF LIQUID LIMIT AND PLASTIC LIMIT IS : 2720 (Part 5) - 1985

Location : ROB-22 Chainage :155500 M BH : 1 Depth in M: 4.50

Sampling Date: 08-02-2025 Date of testing: 10-02-2025


LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT
Determination Number 1 2 3 4 1 2
Number of drops 35 30 26 20
Container number 13 14 15 16 0 17 18
Wt. of container + wet soil, gm 36.00 33.31 26.48 28.67 27.12 27.01
Wt. of container + oven dry soil, gm
32.94 30.43 23.40 25.89 25.54 25.13
weight of water, gm 3.06 2.88 3.08 2.78 1.58 1.88
Weight of container, gm 24.85 23.06 15.72 19.24 18.6 17.29
weight of oven dry soil, gm 8.09 7.37 7.68 6.65 6.94 7.84
Moister content, % 37.82 39.08 40.10 41.80 22.77 23.98
Liquid limit at 25 no of drops: 40.43 Plastic limit: 23.375

Liquid Limit Graph y = -0.265x + 47.054 Plasticity Chart


43.00 60

42.00 50
CL
CI CH

Plasticity Index
40
Moisture Content in %

41.00
30
40.00
20
MH-OH
39.00
10
CL-ML MI-OI
ML-OL
38.00 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
37.00 Lquid Limit
1 10 100
No of Blow s
Soil Clasification CI

Triaxial Shear Test As Per IS : 2720 Part -11 1993


Location- ROB-22 Chainage- 155500 M Sampling Date:- 08-02-2025 Date of te sting:- 10-02-2025

BH- 1 Depth- 1.5 m

Deviator stress
σ3 (kg/cm2) σ1 (kg/cm2) Radius σavg
at failure
0.5 2.08 0.79 1.29 1.58
1 2.79 0.895 1.895 1.79
1.5 3.51 1.005 2.505 2.01

Shear strength chart


1.4

1.2 y = 0.1812x + 0.582

1
Shear stress in Kg/cm2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Normal stress in Kg/cm2

0 0.582 Cohesion In Kg/cm2 0.58


3.5 1.216164861 Friction angle in Degree 10.27
Triaxial Shear Test As Per IS : 2720 Part -11 1993
Location- ROB-22 Chainage- 155500 M Sampling Date :- 08-02-2025 Date of te sting:- 11-02-2025
BH- 1 De pth- 3m

2 2 Deviator stress
σ3 (kg/cm ) σ1 (kg/cm ) Radius σavg
at failure
0.5 1.74 0.62 1.12 1.24
1 2.48 0.74 1.74 1.48
1.5 3.24 0.87 2.37 1.74

Shear strength chart


1.2
y = 0.206x + 0.412

1
Shear stress in Kg/cm2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Normal stress in Kg/cm2

0 0.412 Cohesion In Kg/cm2 0.41


3.5 1.132993605 Friction angle in Degree 11.64

Triaxial Shear Test As Per IS : 2720 Part -11 1993


Location- ROB-22 Chainage- 155500 M Sampling Date :- 08-02-2025 Date of tes ting:- 11-02-2025
BH- 1 De pth- 4.5 m

2 2 Deviator stress
σ3 (kg/cm ) σ1 (kg/cm ) Radius σavg
at failure
0.5 1.95 0.725 1.225 1.45
1 2.72 0.86 1.86 1.72
1.5 3.50 1 2.5 2.00

Shear strength chart


1.4

y = 0.2189x + 0.487
1.2

1
Shear stress in Kg/cm2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Normal stress in Kg/cm2

0 0.487 Cohesion In Kg/cm2 0.49


3.5 1.253323548 Friction angle in Degree 12.35
Geotechnical Test Results for Rock Samples
DETERMINATION OF WATER CONTENT, DRY DENSITY & POROSITY IS : 13030 1991
1. Cross
Avg. 3. Oven dry 4. Saturated
Avg. dia. sectional 2. Volume of 6. Dry density 7. Water
Chainage in length of weight of surface dry 5. weight of 8. Porosity in
Sl No Location BH No Depth of sample area of sample, in of sample, in Absorption in
M sample sample, in wt of sample, water, in gm %
in cm sample in Cm3 gm/Cm3 %
in cm gm (W1) in gm (W2)
Cm2
Sampling Date:- 08-02-2025 Testing Date:- 10-02-2025 To 11-02-2025
1 4.50-7.50 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2 7.50-10.50 4.18 5.29 21.98 91.87 212.22 214.05 1.83 2.31 0.86 1.99
3 10.50-13.50 6.24 5.40 22.90 142.91 340.13 342.64 2.52 2.38 0.74 1.76
ROB-22 155500 M 1
4 13.50-16.50 11.07 5.44 23.24 257.30 627.81 631.51 3.70 2.44 0.59 1.44
5 16.50-19.50 10.57 5.45 23.33 246.58 660.83 662.75 1.92 2.68 0.29 0.78
6 19.50-20.00 12.30 5.46 23.41 287.99 777.58 779.44 1.87 2.70 0.24 0.65

Geotechnical Test Results for Rock Samples


DETERMINATION OF SP. GRAVITY OF ROCK IS : 13030 1991

Wt. of Wt. of Wt. of


Wt. of empty
Chainage in Pycnomete Pycnometer + Pycnometer + Pycnometer + Sp. Gravity= (2-
Sl No Location BH No Depth Pycnometer
M r No Rock sample Rock sample full of water 1)/(4-1)-(3-2)
gm
gm + water gm gm

Sampling Date:- 08-02-2025 Testing Date:- 10-02-2025 to 11-02-2025


1 4.50-7.50 -- -- -- -- -- --
2 7.50-10.50 1 607.02 819.24 1628.17 1508.22 2.30
3 10.50-13.50 2 553.43 893.56 1657.57 1459.76 2.39
ROB-22 155500 M 1
4 13.50-16.50 3 602.33 1230.14 1857.26 1486.75 2.44
5 16.50-19.50 1 607.02 1267.85 1921.55 1508.22 2.67
6 19.50-20.00 3 602.33 1379.91 1975.27 1486.75 2.69
Geotechnical Test Results for Rock Samples
UNIAXIAL COMPRESSION STRENGTH OF ROCK IS : 9221-1979
2. Cross
1. Avg. 3. Avg.
sectional
Chainage in dia. of Length of 4. Peak load, 5. UCS, in
Sl No Location BH No Depth area of
M sample in sample, in in Kn MPa
sample in
cm cm
Cm2
Sampling Date:- 08-02-2025 Testing Date:- 11-02-2025
1 4.50-7.50 -- -- -- -- --
2 7.50-10.50 -- -- -- -- --
3 10.50-13.50 -- -- -- -- --
ROB-22 155500 M 1
4 13.50-16.50 5.44 23.24 11.07 103.83 44.67
5 16.50-19.50 5.45 23.33 10.57 128.94 55.27
6 19.50-20.00 5.46 23.41 12.30 140.91 60.18
Geotechnical Test Results for Rock Samples
POINT LOAD STRENGTH INDEX OF ROCK IS : 8764-1998

2. Standared 4. Point Load


1. Diameter 3. Peak
Chainage in Diameter of Index, qt=
Sl No Location BH No Depth of sample D 0 load, P in 1.5 0
M sample D in (P*1000)/(D *√D )
in mm Kn
mm in MPa

Sampling Date:- 08-02-2025 Testing Date:- 11-02-2025


1 4.50-7.50 -- -- -- --
2 7.50-10.50 52.90 50.00 2.42 0.89
3 10.50-13.50 54.00 51.00 3.46 1.22
ROB-22 155500 M 1
4 13.50-16.50 54.40 52.00 6.19 2.14
5 16.50-19.50 54.50 53.00 7.29 2.49
6 19.50-20.00 54.60 54.00 9.01 3.04
Summary of Shallow Foundation Capacity
Safe Bearing Allowable Safe
Capacity Bearing
Sr. No. BH No. Depth (m) Remarks
(T/m2) Capacity(T/m2)

1 1.50 25.70 25.00 As Per IS 6403


01
2 10.50 41.67 41.00 IS:12070 - 2010
CALCULATION OF NET ALLOW ABLE BEARING CAPACITY FOR SHALLOW
FOUNDATION

ROB-22 AT
Borehole No. = BH-01 Type of Structure =
CH-155+500

Determination of Net Allowable Bearing Capacity


(As per IS 6403-1981)

A.Input Data

Rectangle
Type of Footing =
footing

Width of footing,B = 3m

= 300 cm

Length of footing = 6m

Depth of
= 1.5m
Foundation,Df
Bulk Unit weight
= 1.72 g/cc
,ϒbulk

0.002 kg/cm³

Specific Gravity, G = 2.61

Water Content = 0.0976

Unit weight of
= 1 g/cc
water,ϒw
Unit weight of
= 0.72 g/cc
submerged,ϒSub

Void Ratio, e = 0.67 g/cc

Factor of Safety = 2.5

Condition of Soil = Medium

Interpolate
For Interpolate
between
between General =
General Shear
Shear & Local Shear
& Local Shear
For Interpolate
(C X Nc X Sc X dc X ic)+(q(Nq-1) X Sq X dq X iq)+(0.5 X Bγ
between General =
X Nγ X Sγ X dγ X iγ X W')
Shear & Local Shear
Where,

C = Cohesion

q = Overburden Pressure

B = Width of Foundation
Nc,Nq,Nϒ
/ = Bearing Capacity Factors
N'c,N'q,N' ϒ
Sc,Sq,Sϒ = Shape Factors

Dc,Dq,Dϒ = Depth Factors

φ = Angle of Shear Resistance of soil in degrees

ϒ = Bulk Unit Weight

W' = Correction factor for location of water table

C = 0.58 Kg/cm²

q = 0.11 Kg/cm²

φ = 10.27°

φ' = 6.92°

Nc = 8.49

Nq = 2.55

Nϒ = 1.30

N'c = 7.20

N'q = 1.92

N'ϒ = 0.75

Sc = 1.1
Sq = 1.1

Sϒ = 0.8

W' = 0.5

Nφ = 1.43

dc = 1.12

dq = dϒ = 1.06

ic = 1.00

iq = 1.00

iϒ = 1.00

(C X Nc X Sc X dc X ic)+(q(Nq-1) X Sq X dq X iq)+(0.5 X Bγ
qd =
X Nγ X Sγ X dγ X iγ X W')
((0.58 x 8.49202 x 1.1 x 1.12 x 1)+(0.11 x (2.54938 - 1) x
1.1 x 1.06 x 1)+((0.5 x 300 x 0.002 x 1.29722 x 0.8 x 1 x
0.5)))
= 6.43 Kg/cm²

= 2.57 Kg/cm²

= 25.7 T/m²
CALCULATION OF SETTLEM ENT FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATION

ROB-22 AT
Borehole No. = BH-01 Type of Structure =
CH-155+500

Determination of Settlement For Shallow Foundation


(As per IS 8009 Part-I)

A.Input Data

Bulk Unit weight ,ϒbulk = 1.72 T/m³

Depth of Foundation,Df = 1.5m

Width of footing,B = 3m

Length of footing = 6m

Poisson ratio(µ1) = 0.30

Shape of Foundation = Rectangle

L/B = 2

Influence Factor (If ) = 1.31

Net Base Pressure, P = 0.26 Kg/cm²

Mid depth
Youngs
From layer below (ΔP) C Mvc Si Sc St
Layers To (m) 2 2 SPT, N Modulus 2 λ
(m) Thick founding (kg/cm ) (kg/cm ) 2 (cm /kg) cm cm cm
(kg/cm )
level (m)

0.00 1.50

1.50 3.00 1.50 2.25 0.108 0.41 33.00 184.500 0.006 0.33 0.209 0.032 0.24

3.00 4.50 1.50 3.75 0.071 0.49 44.00 220.500 0.005 0.34 0.115 0.018 0.13

Total 0.324 0.050 0.374

Hence Settlement = 0.374 cm

= 3.74mm

Permisible Settlement as per IRC 78 2014 = 25mm

= Hence OK
SBC Calculation ( Ref. IS:12070 - 2010 )

BOREHOLE DATA AND SOIL PROPERTIES


ROB-21 155+500
BH Chainage = 155+500
BH No. = BH-01
Tensile Strength of Rock (MPa) = 0.89 At level of 10.50 m
Unconfined Compression Test (qu) = 19.58 MPa

ESTIMATE OF SAFE BEARING PRESSURE FROM THE CORE STRENGTH

Strata identification = Greyish to blackish, fine grained,


highly to moderately weathered and
fracture carbonaceous phyllite

Unaxial compressive strength of rock at


19.580 MPa
foundation Level (qc) =
1995.9 T/m2
Foundation Level = 10.50 m below EGL
Empirical coefficient depending on the
0.10 (cl. 6.2, Table 4,of IS:12070)
spacing of discontinuities (Nj) =
Water table correction (R w ) = 0.50 (cl. 9.2 of IS:12070)
Factor Joint in slope 0.50
Calculate safe bearing pressure, (qs) = qc x Nj x R w(cl. 6.2 of IS:12070)
2
50.00 T/m
Factor of Saftey 1.20
Calculate safe bearing pressure, (qs) = 41.67 T/m2

RAJESH AVINASH
KUMAR GUPTA ABLIS Digitally
signed by
KUMAR H ABLISH
KUMAR
Digitally signed by
Digitally signed by
RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA
Date: 2025.05.26
AVINASH KUMAR KUMA Date:
2025.05.26
Date: 2025.05.26
16:44:19 +05'30'
16:44:57 +05'30' R 18:54:20
+05'30'

You might also like