DATE : 17/08/2025
The Fabric of Reality: A Report on the
Evolution of Space, Time, and Their
Laws, from the Newtonian Epoch to the
Quantum Frontier presented by ; ARUSH TRIPATHI
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of humanity's understanding of
time and space, tracing the conceptual journey from classical physics to the present-day
quantum revolution. The document begins with Isaac Newton's foundational ideas of an
absolute, static, and independent container for the universe, a framework that successfully
described motion for centuries. This paradigm was fundamentally challenged by a series of
pivotal experiments and theoretical breakthroughs in the early 20th century. We then detail
the monumental paradigm shift initiated by Albert Einstein's theories of relativity, which
unified space and time into a single, dynamic continuum. In this new view, spacetime is not a
passive backdrop but an active participant in cosmic events, warped by the presence of
matter and energy.
The final sections of the report delve into the most profound conceptual challenges posed by
quantum mechanics, which introduced a probabilistic, uncertain, and non-local reality that
seems fundamentally at odds with the smooth, deterministic geometry of relativity. This
unresolved tension has led physicists to the frontiers of theoretical physics. The report
culminates in an exploration of cutting-edge frontier theories, such as Loop Quantum Gravity
and String Theory, which suggest that spacetime itself may be an emergent property, a
fluid-like phenomenon arising from a more fundamental, discrete, or information-based
reality. The document synthesizes both the theoretical frameworks and the critical
experimental evidence—from the Michelson-Morley experiment to modern Bell tests—that
have driven these profound changes in our understanding of existence.
1. The Classical Paradigm: Absolute Space and Time
For over two centuries, the physics of Isaac Newton provided a framework that not only
explained the motion of objects on Earth but also elegantly described the celestial mechanics
of the solar system. This classical worldview was built upon a set of deeply intuitive yet
ultimately unprovable assumptions about the nature of space and time.
1.1. Newton's Grand Framework
The bedrock of Newtonian physics is the trio of Newton's Laws of Motion, first published in his
1687 work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica.1 Newton's First Law describes the
principle of inertia, stating that an object at rest remains at rest, and an object in motion
remains in motion at a constant speed in a straight line, unless acted upon by an unbalanced
force.1 This is the very principle that allows a spacecraft, far from any gravitational source, to
coast forever without propulsion.1 Newton's Second Law quantifies the relationship between
force, mass, and acceleration, often expressed by the formula
F=ma. It states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the force applied
to it and inversely proportional to its mass.1 His Third Law, often cited for explaining rocket
propulsion, states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.1
These laws, while a triumph of classical mechanics, implicitly rely on a universal, external
frame of reference. The concepts of a "straight line" and "constant speed" are meaningful
only when measured against something that is itself static and unchanging. This reliance on a
fixed, universal backdrop for all motion is what makes the Newtonian paradigm so successful
in our everyday experience, yet also so fragile when scrutinized at the cosmic scale.
1.2. The Philosophical Foundations
Newton's grand physical framework was supported by his equally grand philosophical
definitions of space and time. He distinguished between "absolute" and "relative" concepts.
According to Newton, "absolute, true, and mathematical time...flows equably without relation
to anything external".3 This meant that time was a universal clock, ticking uniformly and
independently of any physical processes, such as the motion of a planet or the swing of a
pendulum. This "absolute" time could not be perceived directly, but its steady flow was the
foundation for all motion and duration.
Similarly, Newton defined "absolute space" as that which "in its own nature, without relation to
anything external, remains always similar and immovable".4 This concept posits a fixed,
three-dimensional grid, an immovable stage upon which all events and motions unfold. It
serves as the ultimate, objective reference frame. In this worldview, "real, absolute rest" is the
state of a body remaining in the same part of this immovable space, while relative motion is
merely a change in position with respect to other, movable bodies, such as a ship's cabin.4
The critical, yet unperceived, assumption is that this absolute state, though unobservable, is
what governs the true dynamics of the universe. This philosophical underpinning, which
treated space and time as distinct and fixed containers, would become the central point of
contention for later physicists.
2. The Relativistic Transformation: Spacetime as a
Dynamic Continuum
The turn of the 20th century marked a profound shift away from the comfortable determinism
of the Newtonian universe. A series of theoretical and experimental developments began to
dismantle the concept of an absolute, universal stage and replaced it with a dynamic,
interconnected reality.
2.1. The Catalyst: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
For much of the 19th century, physicists operated under the assumption that light, like other
waves such as sound or water waves, required a medium to propagate. This hypothetical
medium was dubbed the "luminiferous aether," a substance believed to permeate all of
space.5 The Michelson-Morley experiment, conducted in 1887, was designed to detect the
Earth's motion through this aether, a phenomenon known as "aether wind".5 The experiment
meticulously compared the speed of light along two perpendicular paths, one aligned with the
Earth's direction of travel and the other at a right angle to it.5
Despite its meticulous design, the experiment yielded a null result. There was no significant
difference detected in the speed of light, regardless of the orientation of the apparatus.5 This
outcome was a severe blow to the aether theory and, by extension, to the classical concept of
absolute space and time that the aether was meant to embody.6 The experiment’s failure to
detect any aether drift directly challenged the prevailing paradigm and forced a re-evaluation
of fundamental principles. As Albert Einstein later acknowledged, the Michelson-Morley
experiment created a "serious embarrassment" for physicists, one that ultimately
necessitated the revolutionary ideas of relativity.5 The null result suggested a radical
conclusion: the speed of light is a universal constant, the same for all observers, regardless of
their own motion.7
2.2. Special Relativity: The Union of Space and Time
Einstein’s 1905 theory of special relativity was a direct response to this crisis. Rather than
positing a new medium, he built his theory on two elegant postulates: the constancy of the
speed of light in a vacuum for all inertial observers and the principle that the laws of physics
are the same for all such observers.7 From these seemingly simple assumptions, two
profoundly counter-intuitive phenomena emerge: time dilation and length contraction.7
The phenomena can be understood by considering the fundamental relationship between
speed, distance, and time. If two observers, one stationary and one in motion, both measure
the speed of a light beam to be the same, but their reference frames are different, they must
disagree on the distance traveled and the time elapsed.7 This leads to the conclusion that
time is not absolute but is relative to an observer's velocity. Time slows down for an object as
its speed approaches that of light, a phenomenon known as time dilation.8 Similarly, the
length of an object appears to contract in the direction of its motion from the perspective of a
stationary observer.8 The mathematical framework for these effects, the Lorentz
transformations, had already been developed by others to explain the Michelson-Morley
results, but it was Einstein who provided them with a new, coherent physical foundation based
on his postulates.7
The practical implications and experimental validation of special relativity are abundant. The
Hafele-Keating experiment in 1971, which used atomic clocks on commercial airliners,
provided direct confirmation of time dilation.8 A more pervasive and crucial example is the
Global Positioning System (GPS). The satellites in the GPS network travel at high speeds, and
their onboard atomic clocks experience time dilation. To ensure the precise positioning that
the system provides, the effects of special relativity on these clocks must be meticulously
accounted for in the system's calculations.8 This practical necessity demonstrates that
relativistic effects are not merely theoretical curiosities but a fundamental feature of our
modern technological world.
2.3. General Relativity: Gravity as Geometry
In his 1915 theory of general relativity, Einstein extended his ideas to include acceleration and
gravity. He discarded Newton's view of gravity as a mysterious force acting instantaneously
across vast distances.9 Instead, he proposed a revolutionary geometric interpretation: gravity
is the curvature of a unified four-dimensional manifold known as spacetime.9 This is famously
summarized by the maxim, "matter tells spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells
matter how to move".10
The presence of massive bodies, such as stars and planets, distorts the geometry of
spacetime, and objects in motion simply follow the straightest possible path through this
curved space.9 The analogy of a bowling ball on a stretched rubber sheet is often used to
visualize this effect, where the bowling ball's mass creates a depression, and a rolling marble,
representing a smaller object, follows the curvature of the sheet towards the ball.12 This model
explains how the orbits of planets are not due to a force pulling them, but rather to their
motion along the curved paths created by the sun's mass.
This geometric view of gravity had a number of testable predictions. One of the earliest and
most famous confirmations came from the 1919 solar eclipse expedition led by Arthur Stanley
Eddington.14 The experiment sought to measure the bending of starlight as it passed near the
Sun. According to Einstein's theory, the light from stars located behind the Sun would be
deflected by the Sun's warped spacetime, making the stars appear in a slightly different
position than they would otherwise.14 The successful observation of this effect provided
compelling evidence for general relativity and cemented Einstein's fame.14 Today, this principle
is widely observed in the cosmos as "gravitational lensing," where massive galaxy clusters
magnify and distort the images of distant objects, providing an ongoing confirmation of the
theory on astronomical scales.14 Other predictions of the theory, such as gravitational time
dilation, black holes, and gravitational waves, have also been experimentally confirmed,
solidifying general relativity as the accepted description of gravity in modern physics.11
3. The Quantum Enigma: A Probabilistic and Non-Local
Universe
Just as relativity reshaped our understanding of space and time at macroscopic and cosmic
scales, quantum physics introduced a new reality at the microscopic level that was even more
radical. It departed from the deterministic elegance of both classical and relativistic
frameworks, introducing a universe governed by probabilities and fundamental uncertainty.
3.1. The Quantized World
The first indications of this new paradigm emerged from experiments that showed that certain
physical properties were not continuous but existed in discrete "packets" or "quanta." The
discovery of the electron as a fundamental quantum of charge by J.J. Thomson and Robert
Millikan demonstrated that charge itself was not a continuous variable but came in integer
multiples of a fixed value.16 Similarly, to explain phenomena like blackbody radiation and the
photoelectric effect, physicists such as Max Planck and Albert Einstein had to assume that
light and energy were also quantized into finite packets known as photons.16 This idea, that at
its most fundamental level, reality is composed of discrete chunks, set the stage for a new
kind of physics.
3.2. Superposition and Entanglement
The core of quantum mechanics lies in concepts that are profoundly counter-intuitive to our
everyday experience. One such concept is superposition, which states that a quantum
particle can exist in a combination of all its possible states simultaneously until a
measurement is made.17 The familiar analogy of a coin, which is either heads or tails, breaks
down in the quantum world. A quantum coin is in a state of both heads and tails at once, and
its definitive state "does not even exist until you look at it".17 This departure from definite
values to a probabilistic description of reality is a central tenet of the theory.18
A related and even more perplexing phenomenon is quantum entanglement. This is a special
form of superposition involving two or more particles, where their quantum states are
intrinsically linked in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described
independently of the others, regardless of how far apart they are.17 A measurement
performed on one entangled particle instantly influences the state of the other, even if they
are separated by billions of light-years.17 This seemingly instantaneous connection, which
appeared to violate the relativistic speed limit of light, was famously dubbed "spooky action at
a distance" by Albert Einstein.17
3.3. Bell's Theorem and the Rejection of Local Realism
The paradox of entanglement led to a major philosophical and physical debate. Einstein, along
with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, proposed that quantum mechanics must be an
incomplete theory.20 They argued that the correlations seen in entangled particles must be
due to "local hidden variables"—pre-determined properties that exist within the particles from
the moment they are created but are unknown to us.19 This idea preserved the principle of
locality, which states that an event at one point cannot instantly affect an event at a distant
point.
In 1964, physicist John Stewart Bell devised a theorem that provided a way to empirically test
this hypothesis.20 Bell's theorem established a mathematical inequality that any local hidden
variable theory must satisfy. A quantum experiment could then be performed to see if the
statistical correlations of entangled particles violated this inequality. If they did, it would prove
that local hidden variables could not explain the phenomenon.20
The results of Bell tests have been consistent and unequivocal. In every modern experiment,
the correlations between entangled particles have been found to violate Bell's inequality,
conclusively ruling out any local deterministic explanation.20 The experimental validation of
these violations is considered one of the most profound discoveries in modern physics,
earning the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for John Clauser, Alain Aspect, and Anton Zeilinger.20
The implication is that the bizarre, non-local nature of reality is not a feature of an incomplete
theory but a fundamental property of the universe itself.
4. Unification and Emergence: The Frontiers of Physics
Despite their individual successes, the two pillars of modern physics—general relativity and
quantum mechanics—remain fundamentally incompatible. The search for a unified theory of
quantum gravity is the central challenge of 21st-century physics and has led to speculative
but critical ideas about the very nature of space and time.
4.1. The Fundamental Conflict: A Tale of Two Realities
The conflict between general relativity and quantum mechanics is both conceptual and
mathematical. General relativity is a classical, deterministic theory where physical quantities
have definite values. It models gravity as a smooth, continuous curvature of spacetime.18 In
contrast, quantum theory is probabilistic, assigning a range of probabilities to a particle's
position and momentum rather than a definite value.18 The very notion of a smooth, definite
spacetime breaks down at the microscopic scales where quantum uncertainty dominates.
Reconciling a smooth geometric continuum with a discrete, probabilistic, and non-local reality
is a challenge that has so far resisted a definitive solution.18
4.2. Spacetime as a Granular Structure: The Quantum Foam
In a groundbreaking thought experiment, physicist John Wheeler proposed the concept of
"quantum foam".21 At the unimaginably small scales of the Planck length (approximately
10−35 meters), the uncertainty principle might cause the geometry of spacetime itself to
fluctuate wildly.21 This would create a foamy, ever-changing structure where space and time
are not definite but are constantly created and destroyed in a chaotic, bubbling sea of virtual
particles.21
While direct observation of this "foam" remains beyond current technology, some underlying
ideas of vacuum fluctuations are supported by experimental evidence. The Casimir effect, for
instance, which demonstrates an attractive force between two uncharged plates in a vacuum,
provides strong evidence for the existence of these virtual particles.22 However, tests
designed to detect the effects of a foamy spacetime, such as variations in the speed of light
for different wavelengths of light, have so far yielded null results, setting important constraints
on the extent of these fluctuations.21
The theory of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) attempts to make this granular idea quantitative. It
postulates that the fabric of space and time is not a smooth continuum but is composed of
finite, discrete loops woven into a fine network called a "spin network" or "spin foam".23 In this
view, space itself has an atomic, quantized structure, and distances smaller than the Planck
length are meaningless.24 The theory attempts to develop a quantum theory of gravity based
directly on Einstein's geometric formulation, suggesting that the familiar smooth geometry of
our macroscopic world emerges from the collective behavior of these fundamental, quantized
units.24
4.3. Spacetime as an Emergent Property
A different and even more radical approach suggests that spacetime is not a fundamental
entity at all, but an emergent property that arises from a deeper, more fundamental reality.26
The analogy of water is often used to explain this concept: at a macroscopic level, water
appears as a continuous fluid, but at a microscopic level, it is composed of countless discrete
H2O molecules.25 In this view, the continuity of space and the ticking of time are macroscopic
illusions masking a deeper, more granular reality governed by quantum information theory.25
One prominent theory that explores this idea is String Theory. This theory posits that the
fundamental constituents of the universe are not point-like particles but tiny, one-dimensional
vibrating strings.27 These strings exist and propagate within a higher-dimensional background
spacetime, often requiring 10 or 11 dimensions to be mathematically consistent.27 However,
the theory also suggests that the strings themselves can affect the spacetime they are in, and
that different laws of physics can arise from different "compactifications," or shapes, of the
extra dimensions.28 This leads to the profound possibility that the structure of spacetime is
not a fixed input but an outcome determined by the fundamental properties of the theory
itself, making it a potentially emergent feature rather than a fundamental container.28
Another manifestation of this idea is the Holographic Principle, which suggests that our
four-dimensional universe is a projection of information encoded on a lower-dimensional
boundary, much like a hologram.25 In this framework, spacetime is not fundamental but is an
illusion generated by underlying quantum information. This principle provides a powerful way
to conceptualize how time could arise from the ordering of quantum events or patterns of
entanglement, suggesting that a sense of "before" and "after" is not an intrinsic feature but a
consequence of information processing at a more fundamental level.25
5. The Puzzle of Time's Direction: The Arrow of Time
A central and unsolved question in physics is why time seems to have a one-way direction, a
concept first formalized by Arthur Eddington as "time's arrow".29 The laws of physics at the
microscopic level, whether classical or quantum, are largely time-reversible. This means that if
you were to reverse the motion of every particle in a system, the system would retrace its
steps back in time. So, if the fundamental laws are symmetric with respect to time, why is our
experience of the universe so asymmetric?
Philosophically, this question has been explored through McTaggart's theories of time. The
A-series of time describes events as flowing from future, to present, to past.31 This aligns with
our everyday experience of a "flowing" present. In contrast, the B-series describes events as a
static, ordered set of relationships (e.g., "earlier than" or "later than").31 This static,
block-universe view is more compatible with the geometric, deterministic reality of general
relativity, where all of spacetime is a fixed, four-dimensional block.
The most widely accepted physical explanation for the arrow of time comes from the Second
Law of Thermodynamics, which states that the entropy, or disorder, of an isolated system
always increases over time.32 This law provides a clear, irreversible directionality for
macroscopic systems, from the breaking of a coffee cup to the expansion of the universe.
However, this raises a profound paradox: how can a universe governed by time-reversible
microscopic laws exhibit an irreversible, macroscopic arrow of time? The prevailing view is
that this directionality is likely an emergent property of many interacting parts. Just as the
fluid nature of water emerges from the interactions of individual molecules, the one-way flow
of time appears to emerge from the collective behavior of complex systems, where the sheer
number of possible disordered states vastly outnumbers the ordered ones.25 This theme of
emergence—that a complex, macroscopic property arises from simple, microscopic
interactions—is a powerful one that resonates with the frontier theories of spacetime itself.
6. Conclusion: A New Understanding of Existence
The journey of human understanding of space and time is a powerful narrative of conceptual
evolution. The report began with the classical, intuitive, and highly successful Newtonian
paradigm, which posited a fixed, absolute container for the universe. This deterministic,
clockwork reality was supported by a philosophy of distinct and universal space and time.
The first major paradigm shift was driven by the empirical crisis of the Michelson-Morley
experiment and the theoretical genius of Albert Einstein. Relativity did not just refine our
understanding of motion; it fundamentally merged space and time into a single, dynamic
manifold. In this new view, spacetime is not a passive stage but an active, curvable participant
in the cosmic drama, with gravity as its geometric manifestation.
The second revolution, brought about by quantum physics, was even more radical. It
shattered the deterministic elegance of relativity, replacing definite values with probabilities
and introducing a universe where reality itself is uncertain and profoundly non-local. Concepts
like superposition and entanglement demonstrated that our classical notions of locality and
independent objects were insufficient to describe the microscopic world. The violation of
Bell's inequalities provided irrefutable evidence that this weirdness is not a feature of an
incomplete theory but a fundamental property of reality.
The ongoing search for a unified theory of quantum gravity now occupies the frontier of
physics. This central conflict between the continuous, deterministic spacetime of general
relativity and the probabilistic, discrete nature of quantum mechanics has forced physicists to
consider the most audacious idea of all: that space and time may not be fundamental at all.
Instead, they could be emergent properties, arising from a deeper, granular reality described
by theories like Loop Quantum Gravity or a holographic, information-based universe
suggested by the Holographic Principle.
The journey from an absolute, static container to a dynamic, interconnected participant, and
now to a potentially emergent property, is a profound testament to the power of human
inquiry. The remaining open questions—the nature of dark energy and dark matter, the true
origin of time's arrow, and the ultimate resolution of the quantum-gravity conflict—are not just
puzzles; they are invitations to the next great intellectual revolution, one that will
fundamentally redefine our understanding of the fabric of existence itself.
Table 1: The Evolution of Spacetime Concepts
Paradigm Concept of Concept of Gravity Fundamental
Space Time Nature
Newtonian Absolute, an Absolute, a A force that Deterministic,
immovable and universal clock acts continuous.
static that flows instantaneousl
container for uniformly for y between
all events. all observers. massive
bodies.
Special/Gener A dynamic, A dynamic, The curvature Deterministic,
al Relativity interconnected interconnected of spacetime continuous.
dimension of a dimension of a caused by
four-dimensio four-dimensio matter and
nal spacetime nal spacetime energy.
that is relative that is relative
to the to the
observer's observer's
motion. motion.
Quantum/Em Potentially a Potentially a Gravity as a Probabilistic,
ergent granular granular field of discrete.
structure structure or an spacetime
(Quantum emergent vibrations,
Foam, LQG) or property of a quantized into
an emergent deeper reality, gravitons.
property of a with its
deeper reality. directionality
possibly tied to
entropy.
Table 2: Experimental Pillars of Modern Physics
Experiment/Observation Associated Significance
Theory/Concept
Michelson-Morley Special Relativity The null result disproved
Experiment the existence of the
luminiferous aether and
provided the empirical
foundation for the
constancy of the speed of
light.5
Eddington's Solar Eclipse General Relativity Confirmed Einstein's
Expedition prediction that the Sun's
gravity would bend
starlight, providing the first
major evidence for the
geometric theory of
gravity.14
Hafele-Keating Time Dilation (Special Using atomic clocks on
Experiment Relativity) airplanes, it directly
confirmed that time slows
down for objects in motion,
as predicted by Einstein's
theory.8
Bell Tests Quantum Entanglement Conclusively violated Bell's
inequality, proving that the
correlations of entangled
particles cannot be
explained by local hidden
variables.20
Gravitational Lensing General Relativity Observation of light from
distant objects being bent
by massive intervening
bodies, providing ongoing,
large-scale confirmation of
spacetime curvature.14
Works cited
1. Newton's Laws of Motion - for How Things Fly, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://howthingsfly.si.edu/flight-dynamics/newton%E2%80%99s-laws-motion
2. www1.grc.nasa.gov, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/newtons-laws-of-mo
tion/#:~:text=What%20are%20Newton's%20Laws%20of,the%20amount%20of%2
0force%20applied.
3. www.cambridge.org, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-newton/newt
ons-philosophical-analysis-of-space-and-time/519C503DC7F4E466C8E3322182
BC2DC3#:~:text=Newton%20begins%20by%20defining%20%E2%80%9Cabsolut
e,rotating%20planet%20really%20sweeps%20out
4. Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion > Newton's Scholium ..., accessed
August 17, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-stm/scholium.html
5. Michelson–Morley experiment - Wikipedia, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment
6. Michelson-morley Experiment | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 17,
2025,
https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/michelson-morley-experiment
7. How did Einstein come to terms with the reality of time dilation and length
contraction?, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1gyp978/how_did_einstein_come
_to_terms_with_the_reality/
8. Special Relativity: Time Dilation and Length Contraction Explained, accessed
August 17, 2025, https://www.azoquantum.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=459
9. Spacetime curvature - ESA Science & Technology, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://sci.esa.int/web/lisa-pathfinder/-/56434-spacetime-curvature
10.einstein.stanford.edu, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://einstein.stanford.edu/SPACETIME/spacetime2.html#:~:text=Gravity%20as
%20Curved%20Spacetime,-Einstein%20eventually%20identified&text=Gravity%
20feels%20strongest%20where%20spacetime,tells%20matter%20how%20to%2
0move%22.
11. General relativity - Wikipedia, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity
12.GP-B — Einstein's Spacetime - Gravity Probe B - Stanford University, accessed
August 17, 2025, https://einstein.stanford.edu/SPACETIME/spacetime2.html
13.en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_the_mathematics_of_general_relativi
ty#:~:text=In%20general%20relativity%2C%20energy%20and,the%20sheet%20t
o%20bend%20downward.
14.Hubble Gravitational Lenses - NASA Science, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://science.nasa.gov/mission/hubble/science/science-behind-the-discoveries/
hubble-gravitational-lenses/
15.en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity#:~:text=Gravitational%20l
ensing,-Astronomers%20using%20the&text=By%20comparing%20the%20mass
%20of,on%20these%20astronomical%20length%2Dscales.
16.1 The experimental basis of quantum theory, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://www.astro.uvic.ca/~jwillis/teaching/phys215/phys215_lecture1.pdf
17.What is quantum entanglement? | Space, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://www.space.com/31933-quantum-entanglement-action-at-a-distance.htm
l
18.Quantum Theory from a Space-Time Wave - arXiv, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/0706/0706.0190v2.pdf
19.Quantum entanglement - Wikipedia, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement
20.Bell test - Wikipedia, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_test
21.Quantum foam - Wikipedia, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_foam
22."Nothing" doesn't exist. Instead, there's "quantum foam" - Big Think, accessed
August 17, 2025, https://bigthink.com/hard-science/nothing-exist-quantum-foam/
23.en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity#:~:text=As%20a%20theory%
2C%20LQG%20postulates,loops%20are%20called%20spin%20networks.
24.Loop quantum gravity - Wikipedia, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity
25.Is Space-Time Emergent, and What Does That Mean for Time Travel? | by Sukant
Khurana, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://medium.com/@sukantkhurana/is-space-time-emergent-and-what-does-t
hat-mean-for-time-travel-c3593d5a9dc2
26.The end of spacetime - arXiv, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://arxiv.org/html/2403.10694v1
27.en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory#:~:text=String%20theory%20has%20b
een%20used,shape%20for%20the%20extra%20dimensions.
28.Do strings propagate through spacetime or do they make spacetime? - Physics
Stack Exchange, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/458329/do-strings-propagate-thro
ugh-spacetime-or-do-they-make-spacetime
29.Arrow of time, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time
30.iep.utm.edu, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://iep.utm.edu/arrow-of-time/#:~:text=Time%20is%20very%20often%20repr
esented,those%20directions%20from%20the%20other.
31.A series and B series - Wikipedia, accessed August 17, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_series_and_B_series
32.ELI5: the A and B-series of time : r/askphilosophy - Reddit, accessed August 17,
2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/qz3c26/eli5_the_a_and_bserie
s_of_time/
