Chapter 9
Capacity and Aggregate Planning
To Accompany Russell and Taylor, Operations Management, 4th Edition, 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Defining Capacity
Now:
the rate of output from an OM system per unit of time OR the rate at which the firm withdraws work from the system
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
Supply Chain Capacity
Tactical perspective
output driven units of output, hours worked capability
strategic perspective
what you can and cannot do match capabilities with marketing needs
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
Types of Capacity:
Maximum Capacity
(aka Design)
Defined: The highest rate of output that a process can achieve Calculation involves the following assumptions: equally skilled workers no time loss due to changeovers or product differences no loss of capacity due to PM or planned downtime no OT work or heroic employee efforts Are these assumptions realistic?
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 4
Types of Capacity:
Effective Capacity
Defined: the output rate that managers expect for a given process
Why would you operate below maximum?
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
Types of Capacity:
Demonstrated Capacity
Defined: the actual level of output for a process over a period of time, i.e., the average of output over time Why might this number be different than maximum or effective capacity?
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
Types of Capacity:
Demonstrated Capacity
Demonstrated capacity
what we actually observe can be affected by numerous factors
problems with input problems internally nature of the product
new vs standard
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
Capacity within the Supply Chain
Must deal with the issue of bottlenecks and system constraints. Capacity defined by:
information systems infrastructure physical capacity logistics capacity supplier capacity relationship management
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 8
Bottlenecks
Must look for bottleneck constraining resource how identified too much or too little inventory overtime why important limits output determines lead time determines ability of system to make money Keys to success keep the bottlenecks busy inventories/signals invest in bottlenecks
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
Capacity - calculating
Level of output of a plant or system is dependent on how it is organized
capacity in sequence
linear operations multiple alternative operations any machine can be used
capacity in parallel
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
10
Capacity - Sequential
Capacity of a system or process is based on the operation with the lowest amount of capacity
Keys
convert into the same units of measurement ensure that we are talking about the same dimensions
effective vs design vs demonstrated
capacity taken over the same time
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 11
Capacity - Sequential
We have a process that makes cans
Operation 1 - punches out tops and bottoms
2 lids for every can produces 250 lids per minute 1 body for every can produces 175 bodies per minute
Operation 2 - body
Operation 3 - mating
makes the can produces 7500 cans per hour
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 12
Capacity - Parallel
Capacity of the system or operation is based on the sum of the capacities of the various machines that make up the operation.
Operation 3 has 4 machines
machine 1 - 90 pieces per minute machine 2 - 110 pieces per minute machine 3 -120 pieces per minute machine 4 - 80 pieces per minute Total capacity for operation 3 = 400 pieces/min
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
13
Capacity Management Tools:
Calculating Capacity
1. Describe the general flow of activities within the process 2. Establish the time period 3. Establish a common unit 4. Identify the Maximum capacity for the overall process 5. Identify the Effective capacity for the overall process 6. Determine the Demonstrated capacity 7. Compare the Demonstrated, Effective and Maximum Capacities and take appropriate actions
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 14
Capacity Planning
Establishes overall level of productive resources Affects lead time responsiveness, cost & competitiveness Determines when and how much to increase capacity
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 15
Capacity Expansion
Volume & certainty of anticipated demand Strategic objectives for growth Costs of expansion & operation Incremental or one-step expansion
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
16
Capacity Expansion Strategies
(a) Capacity lead strategy (b) Capacity lag strategy Capacity Demand Units Demand Units Capacity
Time (c) Average capacity strategy
Time (d) Incremental vs. one-step expansion One-step expansion
Capacity
Units
Units
Demand
Incremental expansion Demand
Figure 9.1
Time
Time
Aggregate Production Planning (APP)
Matches market demand to company resources Plans production 6 months to 12 months in advance Expresses demand, resources, and capacity in general terms Develops a strategy for economically meeting demand Establishes a company-wide game plan for allocating resources
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 18
Inputs and Outputs to APP
Capacity Constraints Strategic Objectives Company Policies
Demand Forecasts
Aggregate Production Planning
Financial Constraints
Size of Workforce
Figure 9.3
Production per month (in units or $)
Inventory Levels
Units or dollars subcontracted, backordered, or lost
19
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
Adjusting Capacity to Meet Demand
1. Producing at a constant rate and using inventory to absorb fluctuations in demand (level production) 2. Hiring and firing workers to match demand (chase demand) 3. Maintaining resources for high demand levels 4. Increase or decrease working hours (overtime and undertime) 5. Subcontracting work to other firms 6. Using part-time workers 7. Providing the service or product at a later time period (backordering)
Strategy Details
Level production - produce at constant rate & use inventory as needed to meet demand Chase demand - change workforce levels so that production matches demand Maintaining resources for high demand levels - ensures high levels of customer service
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
21
Strategy Details
Overtime & undertime - common when demand fluctuations are not extreme Subcontracting - useful if supplier meets quality & time requirements Part-time workers - feasible for unskilled jobs or if labor pool exists Backordering - only works if customer is willing to wait for product/services
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
22
Level Production
Demand Production Units
Time
Figure 9.4 (a)
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 23
Chase Demand
Demand Production Units
Time
Figure 9.4 (b)
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 24
APP Using Pure Strategies
QUARTER Spring Summer Fall Winter Hiring cost Firing cost Inventory carrying cost Production per employee Beginning work force SALES FORECAST (LB) 80,000 50,000 120,000 150,000 = $100 per worker = $500 per worker = $0.50 pound per quarter = 1,000 pounds per quarter = 100 workers
Example 9.1
APP Using Pure Strategies
QUARTER Spring Summer Fall Winter
Hiring cost Firing cost Inventory carrying cost Production per employee Beginning work force
SALES FORECAST (LB) 80,000 50,000 120,000 150,000
= $100 per worker = $500 per worker = $0.50 pound per quarter = 1,000 pounds per quarter = 100 workers
Level production (50,000 + 120,000 + 150,000 + 80,000) 4 = 100,000 pounds
Example 9.1
Level Production Strategy
QUARTER Spring Summer Fall Winter SALES FORECAST 80,000 50,000 120,000 150,000 PRODUCTION PLAN INVENTORY 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 20,000 70,000 50,000 0 140,000
Cost = 140,000 pounds x 0.50 per pound = $70,000
Example 9.1
Chase Demand Strategy
QUARTER SALES PRODUCTION FORECAST PLAN WORKERS NEEDED WORKERS WORKERS HIRED FIRED
Spring Summer Fall Winter
80,000 50,000 120,000 150,000
80,000 50,000 120,000 150,000
80 50 120 150
0 0 70 30 100
20 30 0 0 50
Cost = (100 workers hired x $100) + (50 workers fired x $500) = $10,000 + 25,000 = $35,000
Example 9.1
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 28
APP Using Mixed Strategies
MONTH January February March April May June DEMAND (CASES) 1000 400 400 400 400 400 MONTH July August September October November December DEMAND (CASES) 500 500 1000 1500 2500 3000
Production per employee = 100 cases per month Wage rate = $10 per case for regular production = $15 per case for overtime = $25 for subcontracting Hiring cost = $1000 per worker Firing cost = $500 per worker Inventory carrying cost = $1.00 case per month Beginning work force = 10 workers Example 9.2
Demand Management
Shift demand into other periods
Incentives, sales promotions, advertising campaigns
Offer product or services with countercyclical demand patterns Partnering with suppliers to reduce information distortion along the supply chain
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 30
Demand Distortion along the Supply Chain
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
31
Hierarchical Planning Process
Items
Product lines or families
Production Planning
Aggregate production plan
Capacity Planning
Resource requirements plan
Resource Level
Plants
Individual products
Master production schedule
Rough-cut capacity plan
Critical work centers
Components
Material requirements plan
Capacity requirements plan
All work centers
Manufacturing operations
Shop floor schedule
Input/ output control
Individual machines
Figure 9.5
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 32
Aggregate Planning for Services
Most services cant be inventoried Demand for services is difficult to predict Capacity is also difficult to predict Service capacity must be provided at the appropriate place and time 5. Labor is usually the most constraining resource for services 1. 2. 3. 4.
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 33
Best Operating Levels
Average cost per room
Figure 9.2
# Rooms
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 34
Inputs and Outputs to APP
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
35
Level Production
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
36
APP by Linear Programming
Minimize Z = $100 (H1 + H2 + H3 + H4) + $500 (F1 + F2 + F3 + F4) + $0.50 (I1 + I2 + I3 + I4)
Subject to
Demand constraints
where Ht = # hired for period t Ft = # fired for period t It = inventory at end of period t Pt = units produced in period t Wt = workforce size for period t Example 9.3
Production constraints
Work force constraints
P1 - I1 I1 + P2 - I2 I2 + P3 - I3 I3 + P4 - I4 1000 W1 1000 W2 1000 W3 1000 W4 100 + H1 - F1 W1 + H2 - F2 W2 + H3 - F3 W3 + H4 - F4
= 80,000 = 50,000 = 120,000 = 150,000 = P1 = P2 = P3 = P4 = W1 = W2 = W3 = W4
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
37
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
APP by the Transportation Method
QUARTER EXPECTED DEMAND REGULAR CAPACITY OVERTIME CAPACITY SUBCONTRACT CAPACITY
1 2 3 4
900 1500 1600 3000
1000 1200 1300 1300
100 150 200 200
$20 $25 $28 $3 300 units
500 500 500 500
Regular production cost per unit Overtime production cost per unit Subcontracting cost per unit Inventory holding cost per unit per period Beginning inventory
Example 9.4
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
38
The Transportation Tableau
Table 9.2
PERIOD OF USE Unused Capacity 9 300 PERIOD OF PRODUCTION Beginning Inventory 1 Regular Overtime Subcontract 2 Regular Overtime Subcontract 3 Regular Overtime Subcontract 4 Regular Overtime Subcontract Demand 900 1500 1600 300 600 1 0 2 3 3 6 4 Capacity
20
25 28
300
23
28 31
100
26
31 34
100
29
34 37
1000 100 500 1200 150 250 500 1300 200 500 1300 200 500 250
1200
20 25 28
23 28 31
150 250 500 1300 200 500 3000
26 31 34 23 28 31 20 25 28
1300 200
20 25 28
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
39
Burruss Production Plan
REGULAR SUBENDING PERIOD DEMAND PRODUCTION OVERTIME CONTRACT INVENTORY
1 2 3 4 Total
900 1500 1600 3000 7000
1000 1200 1300 1300 4800
100 150 200 200 650
0 250 500 500 1250
500 600 1000 0 2100
Table 9.3
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 40
Other Quantitative Techniques
Linear decision rule (LDR) Search decision rule (SDR) Management coefficients model
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
41
Hierarchical Planning Process
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
42
Available-to-Promise
ON-HAND = 50
Forecast Customer orders Master production schedule Available to promise
1
100 200
2
100
PERIOD 3 4
100 200 100
5
100 200
6
100
ON-HAND = 50
Forecast Customer orders Master production schedule Available to promise
1
100 90 200 40
2
100 120
PERIOD 3 4
100 130 200 0 100 70
5
100 20 200 170
6
100 10
ATP in period 1 = (50 + 200) - (90 + 120) = 40 ATP in period 3 = 200 - (130 + 70) = 0 ATP in period 5 = 200 - (20 + 10) = 170 Example 9.5
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 43
Available-to-Promise
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
44
Available-to-Promise
Product Request
Yes
Is the product available at this location?
Is an alternative product available at an alternate location? No Capable-topromise date
Yes
Availableto-promise
No
Allocate inventory
Availableto-promise
Yes
Is an alternative product available at this location?
Allocate inventory Yes
No
Is the customer willing to wait for the product?
Yes
Revise master schedule
Is this product available at a different location? No
No
Trigger production
Figure 9.6
Lose sale
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc
45
Yield Management
Cu P(n < x) Cu + Co
where n = number of no-shows x = number of rooms or seats overbooked Cu = cost of underbooking; i.e., lost sale Co = cost of overbooking; i.e., replacement cost P = probability
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 46
Yield Management
NO-SHOWS 0 1 2 3 PROBABILITY .15 .25 .30 .30
Example 9.4
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 47
Yield Management
NO-SHOWS 0 1 2 3 PROBABILITY .15 .25 .30 .30 P(N < X) .00 .15 .40 .70
.517
Expected number of no shows 0(.15) + 1(.25) + 2(.30) + 3(.30) = 1.75 Optimal probability of no-shows Cu 75 P(n < x) C + C = = .517 75 + 70 u o
Example 9.4
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 48
Yield Management
NO-SHOWS PROBABILITY P(N < X) Cost of overbooking 0 .15 .00 [2(.15) + 1(.25) ]$70 = $38.50 .25 Cost of bumping customers 1 .15 Lost revenue from .40 no-shows.517 2(.30)$75 = $22.50 .30 3 .70 $61.00 .30 Total cost of overbooking by 2 rooms Expected number of no shows Expected savings = ($131.225 - $61) = $70.25 a night 0(.15) + 1(.25) + 2(.30) + 3(.30) = 1.75 Optimal probability of no-shows Cu 75 P(n < x) C + C = = .517 75 + 70 u o
Example 9.4
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 49
Best Operating Levels
Average cost per room
Best operating level
Economies of scale 250
Figure 9.2
Diseconomies of scale 500 1000
# Rooms