Mechanical Engineering Department
Andalas University
TMS 306
ENGINEERING DESIGN
2 cr.
Adjar Pratoto
2010
Quotes
If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. (Varanasi, 2006)
The mere formulation of a problem is far more often essential
than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical
or experimental skill. (Albert Einstein)
If you dont know where youre going, youll probably end up
somewhere else. (Yogi Berra)
Learning Objectives
After completing the course, the students should be able to:
differentiate the analytical approach and the design approach
describe different design process models
explain design phases
communicate effectively
work in team
References:
1.
2.
3.
Cross, N., Engineering Design Methods, 2nd Ed., John Wiley &
Sons, Chichester, 1994
Eggert, R.J., Engineering Design, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper
Saddle River, N.J., 2005
Dieter, G.E., Engineering Design, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill Intl. Ed.,
Singapore, 2000
Engineering Undertaking
New idea
Define need or
opportunity
Specify criteria for
success
Determine probability
of success
Low probability - drop
High probability
Market analysis
Product or system design
and cost estimate
Research and
development
Feasibility study
Refine and revise
Stoecker, 1980
Feasible
Implement construct or
manufacture
Not feasible - drop
Product Realization Process
Product Realization Process
Realized
product
Product development
Product design
Engineering design
Industrial design
Sales/marketing
Customer
need
Ref.: 2
Service
Distribution
Manufacturing
(Production)
Disposal
A customer need for a new or improved product can
originate from almost anywhere in the firm, but the
majority ideas usually originate from the sales or
marketing group
Industrial design activities focus on how the new or revised
product idea is compatible with the customers anatomical
limitations and/or aesthetic trends in the marketplace
Engineering design activities result in recommended
manufacturing specifications that satisfy the customers
functional performance requirements and manufacturing
constraints
Production design activities involve the design, fabrication,
and installation of production equipment, such as jigs,
fixtures, quality control instrumentation, and material
handling equipment. In some cases, it might involve the
construction of a new factory.
Ref.: 2
Manufacturing activities relate to fabrication, assembly,
and testing. They also include training, scheduling, and
supervising
production
employees.
Significant
coordination between engineering design, production
planning, and manufacturing is necessary during ramp-up
as bugs in the product design and manufacturing
processes are worked out.
Distribution activities involve shipping the product in
wholesale-sized lots to distribution centers located around
the country or world.
Service activities for consumer products usually relate to
repair or replacement at the factory. However, large
appliance manufacturers will train repair persons for home
service.
Disposal activities involve the removal, elimination, and/or
recycling of hazardous chemicals or scarce materials
Ref.: 2
The four stages in the life of a product
Design
Manufacture
Use
Retire
Ref.: 2
Establish function
Determine form
Fabricate
Assemble
Distribute
Set up
Operate
Maintain
Repair
Take down
Disassemble
Recycle
Dispose
To satisfy the consumer
We must consider all the phases in the life of a product
What is engineering design?
A goal directed problem solving activity (Archer)
Decision making in the face of uncertainty with high
penalties for error (Asimow)
The use of scientific principles, technical information and
imagination in the definition of a mechanical structure,
machine or system to perform pre-specified functions
with maximum economy and efficiency (Fielden)
To device, subject to certain problem solving
constraints, a component, system or process to
accomplish a specified task optimally, subject to certain
solution constraints (Dixon)
What is engineering design?
Establishes and defines solutions to and pertinent
structures for problems not solved before, or new solutions
to problems which have previously been solved in a
different way (Blumrich)
Process of devising a system, component, or process to
meet desired needs (ABET, Inc.)
Engineering design integrates mathematics, basic
sciences, engineering sciences and complementary
studies in developing elements, systems and processes
to meet specific needs. It is a creative, iterative and
often open-ended process subject to various
constraints (CAB, Canada)
In the course of performing design work,
evidence of the following should be present:
Iterative re-evaluation re-assessment and redevelopment of work plans, specification and constraints
Ongoing communication with key stakeholders or their
representatives
Co-operative approaches (team work)
The Four Cs of Design
Creativity
Requires creation of something that has not existed before or not
existed in the designers mind before
Complexity
Requires decisions on many variables and parameters
Choice
Requires making choices between many possible solutions at all
levels, from basic concepts to smallest detail of shape
Compromise
Requires balancing multiple and sometimes conflicting
requirements
Ref.: 3
Scientific method vs Design method
Existing
knowledge
Scientific
curiosity
State of the art
Identification of
need
Conceptualization
Hypothesis
Logical analysis
Feasibility
analysis
Proof
Production
Scientific Method
Design Method
Types of design
Ref.: 2
Original design
Variant design
Adaptive design
Selection design
Redesign
Artistic design
Tinkering
Original design : conceiving and embodying an original,
innovative concept for a given task. It develops a new
component, assembly, or process that had not existed before.
Variant design seeks to modify the performance of an
existing product by varying some of its design variable values
or product parameters, such as size, or specific material, or
manufacturing processes.
Note, however, that the fundamental working principle or
concept is usually maintained.
Adaptive design is when we adapt a known solution to
accomplish a new task.
Selection design : matching the desired functional
requirements of a component with the actual performance of
standard components listed in vendors catalogs.
Redesign. Much of our working career will be devoted to the
improvement of existing products. To obtain the
improvements we usually modify parts, or subassemblies, or
combinations thereof, by changing their shapes, sizes,
configurations, materials, and manufacturing processes.
Since design is determining form, whenever we improve an
aspect of form, we are essentially redesigning
Artistic design It deals with an objects appearance
(clothing, furniture, etc.). It is not considered as engineering
design.
Tinkering. Development of products (pots, pans, cutlery,
sofas, etc.) using new material or try different fabrication
method without regard to the underlying sciences. It is not
considered as engineering design.
Formulation
original
design
Concept Design
part
design
selection
design
variant
design
Configuration
Design
Configuration
Design
Parametric Design
Parametric Design
Parametric Design
Detail Design
Detail Design
Detail Design
Detail Design
Design projects commonly fall
into one of five types:
Variation of an existing product
Improvement of an existing product
Development of a new product for a lowvolume production run
Development of a new product for mass
production
One-of-a-kind design
Ref.: 3
Design Phases
Anybody can design products!
The design engineer has specific skills:
- He can use analytical tools
Structured Design
Methodologies Get Results!
Notable design cycle time reductions:
Xerox
(design cycle)
70s
1990
1995
3 yr.
< 2 yr.
30 wk.
Caterpillar
1980
1993
50 mo.
20 mo.
Steps in the
Engineering Design Process
Design Phases
Formulation
Concept
Preliminary
Design
Configuration
Embodiment
Design
Parametric
Detail
Need
Analysis of problem
Problem statement
Conceptual design
Selected schemes
Embodiment of schemes
Detailing
Working, drawing, etc
FRENCHS MODEL
PAHL and BEITZ MODEL
Work breakdown structure
W id g e t
D e s ig n
P r o b le m F o r m u la t io n
s it e v is it
Q F D /H o Q
E n g . C h a r a c t e r is t ic s
C o n s t r a in t s
S a is fa c t io n c u r v e s
S e le c t s t r a t e g y
D e v e lo p p la n
D e s ig n r e v ie w m e e t in g
C o n c e p t D e s ig n
G e n e r a t e a lt e r n a t iv e c o n c e p t s
A n a ly z e a lt e r n a t iv e s
E v a lu a t e a lt e r n a t iv e
R e fin e
D e s ig n r e v ie w m e e t in g
C o n fig u r a t io n D e s ig n
P a r a m e t r ic D e s ig n
D e v e lo p a r c h it e c t u r e
G e n e r a t e c o n fig u r a t io n s
A n a ly z e
P a r a m e t r ic p r o b le m fo r m u la t io n
G e n e r a t e a lt e r n a t iv e s
A n a ly z e a lt e r n a t iv e s
DFA
DFM
E v a lu a t e
R e fin e
D e s in r e v ie w m e e t in g
FM EA
F a u lt t r e e s
F is h b o n e d ia g r a m s
E v a lu a t e a lt e r n a t iv e s
O p t im iz a t io n
M u lt i- a t t r ib u t e o p t .
D e s ig n r e v ie w m e e t in g
D e t a il D e s ig n
D e t a il d r a w in g s
A s s e m b ly d r a w in g s
I llu s t r a t io n s
P ro je c t R e p o r t
P ro to ty p e te s t re p o rts
O r a l p r e s e n t a t io n s
D e s ig n r e v ie w m e e t in g
Customer needs
Formulation
Abstract embodiment of
physical principles
Material geometry
Customer requirements
Importance weights
Eng. Charact.
Eng. Design Spec.
Concept Design
Configuration Design
Special-purpose parts.
Standard parts
Design variable values
Sizes, dimensions
Matl./Manufac. processes.
Performance predictions.
Overall satisfaction
Parametric Design
Detail Design
Product specifications
Production drawings
Bills of materials.
Manufact. specifications
Performance tests
Problem Formulation
Need Identification - Clarifying
objectives
When a client, sponsor or company manager first
approaches a designer with a product need, it is unlikely
that the need will be expressed very clearly
The starting point for a design is therefore very often an
ill-defined problem
Customer requirements (Maslow, 1943):
Ref.: 1, 3
Physiological needs
Safety and security needs
Social needs
Psychological needs
Self-fulfillment needs
Stage 1: Clarifying objectives
Gathering Information from customers:
Interviews with customers
Focus group discussion
Customer surveys (external and internal)
Customer complaints
Constructing a survey instrument:
Ref.: 3
Determine the survey purpose
Determine the type of data-collection method
Identify what specific information is needed
Design the questions
Arrange the order of questions
Pretest the survey
Administer the survey
Stage 1: Clarifying objectives
The Objectives Tree Method
Prepare a list of design objectives
Order the list into sets of higher-level and lower-level
objectives
Draw a diagrammatic tree of objectives, showing
hierarchical relationship and interconnections
The branches (or roots) in the tree represent relationship which
suggest means of achieving objectives
Ref.: 1
Ref.: ECE 404 Scott Umbaugh
Establishing functions
The Function Analysis Method
Express the overall function for the design in terms of the conversion
of inputs into outputs
The overall , black box function should be broad widening the system
boundary.
Break down the overall function into a set of essential sub-functions
The sub-functions comprise all the tasks that have to be performed inside
the black box.
Draw a block diagram showing the interactions between sub-functions
The black box is made transparent, so that the sub-functions and their
interconnections are clarified.
Draw the system boundary
The system boundary defines the functional limits for the product or device
to be designed.
Search for appropriate components for performing the sub-functions
and their interactions.
Many alternative components may be capable of performing the identified
functions.
Ref.: 1
Determining characteristics
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
House of Quality
QFD is a planning and problemsolving tool for translating customer
requirements (CRs) into the
engineering characteristics (ECs)
Listen to the voice of customer
House of Quality
Customer
Requirement
Whats
House of quality
1. Identify the customers (internal and external): consumers,
manufacturing, regulators, distribution, marketing, sales
2. List the customer needs (WHAT is to be done), they can be
list as primary, secondary and tertiary
3. Determine the primary importance or priority of the
customer needs (scale of 1-5 or 1-10) (use if possible
pairwise comparison)
4. Translate customer needs into measurable engineering
requirements (HOW to do it in term of measurements).
Each customer need can correspond to multiple
engineering requirements that can be expressed in
quantifiable terms,
5. Determine relationship of engineering design requirements
to customer needs
House of quality
6. Use customer to benchmark existing products and
evaluate the perceived competitions ability to meet the
needs (1-not satisfied need, 5-fully satisfied need)
7. Rank the technical difficulty for each engineering
requirement (1-5 or 1-10)
8. Define interrelationship between technical requirements,
9. Set target values and ideal values for engineering
requirements,
10.Define the most critical engineering requirements by
analyzing the conjunction between customer needs,
benchmarking, interactions and importance
Part
Requirements
QFD 2
Part
Requirements
Target
Production
Requirements
QFD 3
Manufacturing
Requirements
Target
Manufacturing
Requirements
Design
Requirements
Target
Manufacturing
Requirements
Part
Requirements
QFD 1
Design
Requirements
Customer
Requirements
Design
Requirements
QFD 4
Production
Requirements
Target
Generating alternatives
Generating alternatives
Alternative concepts
1
Subfunctions
Transmit
Chain
Belt
Brake
Disc
Drum
Steer
Handlebar Control
Stick
3
Gearbox
Fly-bywire
Generating alternatives
Feature
Means
Support
Wheels
Track
Air cushion
Slides
Propulsion
Driven
wheels
Air thrust
Moving
cable
Linear
induction
Power
Electric
Petrol
Diesel
Bottled gas
Steam
Gears and
shaft
Belts
Chains
hydraulic
Flexible cable
Steering
Turning
wheels
Air thrust
Rails
Stopping
Brakes
Reverse
thrust
Ratchet
Lifting
Hydraulic
ram
Rack and
pinion
Screw
Chain or
rope hoist
Operator
Seated at
front
Seated at
rear
Standing
Walking
Transmission
Pedipulators
Remote
control
Evaluating Alternatives
The screening criteria should focus on functionality and
manufacturability:
Will the concept likely function?
Will the concept likely meet the customers minimum
performance requirements?
Will the concept likely survive the operating environment?
Will the concept likely satisfy other critically important
customer requirements?
Will the concept be manufacturable?
Will the concept likely satisfy the financial and/or marketing
requirements?
The evaluation method:
Weighted-rating Method
Pughs Concept Selection Method
The weighted objectives method
List the design objectives
Rank-order the list of objectives
Assign relative weightings to the objectives
Establish performance parameters or utility
scores for each of the objective
Calculate and compare the relative utility values
of the alternative designs
The weighted objectives method
List the design objectives
Rank-order the list of objectives
Assign relative weightings to the objectives
Establish performance parameters or utility scores for each of the
objective
Calculate and compare the relative utility values of the alternative
designs
The objectives: technical and economic factors,
user requirements, safety requirements, and so
on.
The objectives should be represented in such a
way that could be assessed quantitatively
The weighted objectives method
List the design objectives
Rank-order the list of objectives
Assign relative weightings to the objectives
Establish performance parameters or utility scores for each of the
objective
Calculate and compare the relative utility values of the alternative
designs
For a pair of objectives, determine which is more important (A and B,
A and C, and so forth); assign 1 for more important and 0 for less.
Form a matrix.
The order of importance: B C D A E
The weighted objectives method
List the design objectives
Rank-order the list of objectives
Assign relative weightings to the objectives
Establish performance parameters or utility scores for each of the
objective
Calculate and compare the relative utility values of the alternative
designs
Assign a numerical value to each objective; use a scale of, say, 1 to
10 or 1 to 100 C. Alternatively, decide to share a certain number of
points say 100.
The weighted objectives method
List the design objectives
Rank-order the list of objectives
Assign relative weightings to the objectives
Establish performance parameters or utility scores for each of the
objective
Calculate and compare the relative utility values of the alternative
designs
The weighted objectives method
List the design objectives
Rank-order the list of objectives
Assign relative weightings to the objectives
Establish performance parameters or utility scores for each of the
objective
Calculate and compare the relative utility values of the alternative
designs
Pughs Concept Selection Method
Concept alternatives
Criteria
Gears
V-belts
Chain
High efficiency
High reliability
Low maintenance
Low cost
Light weight
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Modified Pughs Method
Criteria
Importance
Concept alternatives
Weight (%)
Gears V-belts Chain
High efficiency
30
High reliability
25
Low maintenance
20
Low cost
15
Light weight
10
75
n.a.
55
22
n.a.
25
n.a.
20
100
Concept alternatives
Gears
Importance
Criteria
Rating
Weight (%)
V-belts
Weighted
Rating
Rating
Weighted
Chain
Rating
Rating
Weighted
Rating
High efficiency
30
1.20
0.60
0.90
High reliability
25
1.00
0.75
0.75
Low maintenance
20
0.80
0.60
0.40
Low cost
15
0.30
0.60
0.45
Light weight
10
0.20
0.40
0.30
100
Rating
3.50
Value
Unsatisfactory
Just tolerable
Adequate
Good
Very good
2.95
2.80
Engineering Design Selection
Fig. 1-2, Design of Machinery, by R. L. Norton, McGraw-Hill, 2001
We have discussed phases in design
However sometimes it helps to first
reverse engineer and then design
what is reverse engineering?
Dissecting a product
Understanding how it functions
Learn basic principles
Designing/building a new product
with the knowledge from dissection
Initial Observation
Let us explore how a vacuum cleaner works
First identify the vacuum cleaner: type, manufacturer, model#, and
performance specifications
Read the instruction manual
Plug the vacuum cleaner and run it
Listen to the sound
Feel how it runs
Record your observations
Dissection
Wear safety glasses
Unplug the vacuum cleaner
Disassemble it as far as possible
Put all parts in a bin (with label of your group)
Note each part and their purpose (e.g. belt and pulley mechanism,
types of bearings/bushings, motor, etc.)
Are there any other alternatives of these components?
Reassemble
Now reassemble your vacuum cleaner
Suggest any design changes to make reassemble easier
Once all parts are assembled, plug it in and run it (make sure you
have your safety glasses)
If it does not sound or feel like before or smoke comes out, unplug
immediately and run (try to fix the problem later !)
Drill Dissection
Whats so interesting about a drill? Its got lots of good stuff in it - electric
motors, gears, bearings, couplings, etc
It is a good example of an electro-mechanical power transmission system,
and it is also an example of a machine tool (it drills holes)
FISHBONE DIAGRAM FOR MECHANICAL
DISSECTION
(Example: Small Kitchen Scale)
Kitchen Scale
PLATFORM
TOP PLATE
STEM
RIVETS
SPRING MECHANISM
SPRING
NUT
THREADED PIN
FOUR-BAR MECHANISM & HOUSING
(Example: Small Kitchen Scale)
LINK 2
LINK 3
LINK 1
READOUT
BOTTOM
COVER
Pepper Grinder
original design
Original product
Redesigned product
Save money
new design
Fabricated
cost
Purchased
cost
$3.27
$2.7475
$0.5225
$5.12
$0.30
$4.1525 $0.10
$0.9675 $0.20
Source: Huang, Chen, & Chen (2004)
Assembly
cost
Total cost
$8.69
$7.00
$1.69
Material Selection Chart
Ashbys selection chart
Importance of manufacturability and
communication
Second floor collapsed, 114 people died
No Job's
Finished Until
the
Paperwork is
Done