THE NORM OF
MORALITY
MS. FRITZ O. BASSI
NORMS OF MORALITY
INTRODUCTION
since childhood, we learn early the
difference between good and bad
It could then be said that everybody has
a natural inclination towards morality =
Even in primitive society, morality plays
an essential role in the form of things
allowed and prohibited
Morality then is a universal phenomenon;
manifested in every person in every
society
NORMS
in general, they are considered as standard of
measurement
it is an instrument through which the quality
or quantity of a thing is determined
NORMS OF MORALITY
- are the standards that indicate the
rightfulness or wrongfulness, goodness or
evilness, value or disvalue of a thing
- these are qualities that cannot be measured
by any mechanical device because they are
spiritual qualities that appeal only to reason
- norms of morality “criteria of judgment
about the sorts of person we ought to be and
the sorts of action we ought to perform.”
Criteria - a set of principles from which we
may deduce a conclusion.
Morality therefore, consists in the relation of
a thing or action with the norm (conformity or
non-conformity). It can then be defined as
the quality of things manifesting their
conformity or non-conformity with the norm
or criteria. That which conforms = good; that
which do not = evil or immoral
I. OBJECTIVE NORM OF MORALITY = LAW
LAW
an ordinance of reason promulgated for the
common good by one who has charge of the
society
ORDINANCE OF REASON
rational deliberations intended to guide men
towards what is good for them and for the
society
it should not be arbitrary or whimsical but
that which order and direct human acts
toward their ultimate end/Ultimate Good
|
PROMULGATED
made known to the people who are bound to
observe them
the public must be made aware of what is
expected of them; law binds the subject until it
is repealed by the lawful public authority
it is promulgated in a society = presupposes a
community
FOR THE COMMON GOOD
its objective purpose of the Laws is the
attainment of the common good
it is made not to fulfill the lawmakers’ personal
interests but for the good of all
a law is not meant to impose hardships or
needless restrictions
True Law
tends to make men good, liberate them from
perverse and mistaken judgments so as to lead
them to their ultimate end
BY ONE WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THE SOCIETY
a law can only be valid if they are the
legitimate exercise of authority
only those who have the power and
responsibility to govern have the power to
enact law
lawful authority – implies lawful assumption of
power and credibility
Author of the Law: legislator, lawgiver
LAWS = they are necessary to man. They
regulate human activity
without laws, the best intention will be
thwarted either by oneself or by others,
anarchy and chaos will reign because each
one will act according to one’s wishes without
regard for the good of others or for the
common good
without laws = man will not find his ultimate
purpose in life
CLASSIFICATION OF LAWS
ACCORDING TO IMMEDIATE AUTHOR
a) Divine (Positive) Laws
those promulgated, or made known to us
by special command of God
they are explicit demands of our essential
tendencies as rational beings
- they direct man towards his proper end
Ex. Decalogue
b) Human (Positive) Laws
promulgated by a legitimate human authority
= this authority resides either in the State or in
the Church
they are intended to preserve peace and
harmony within a society and to direct each
member of that society to work towards the
common good.
b.1) Ecclesiastical Laws = enacted by the church
embodied in the Canon Law
b.2) Civil Laws = enacted by the state
embodied in the Constitution and Code of Civil
Laws
ACCORDING TO DURATION
a) Temporal Laws = all human laws
b) Eternal Laws = God’s plan and providence
for the universe
ACCORDING TO MANNER OF PROMULGATION
a) Natural Laws
b) Positive Laws
ACCORDING TO WHETHER THEY PRESCRIBE AN ACT
OR FORBID IT
a) Affirmative Laws
those that require the performance of an act
b) Negative Laws
those that require the omission of an act
ACCORDING TO THE EFFECT OF VIOLATION
a) Moral
fault or sin
binds in conscience, that is, enforced by our
personal conviction about what ought to be
done as good or to be avoided as wrong
b) Penal
subject liable to penalty but not inflicted with
sin
binds by virtue of the penalty imposed, that
is, enforced by our fear of being caught and
punished
c) Mixed
both fault and penalty
MORAL AND POLITICAL LAWS
they are those derived from the natural law
They direct man towards the higher values of
development as a human being; rational
being; a person.
Therefore, Moral Laws are universal laws
binding all men alike; they regulate the mind,
heart and body of man insofar as he is a man.
The so-called “natural moral laws” are those
that are written in the hearts of all men. They
are the inherent and essential tendencies of
human nature towards the good proper to it.
Political Laws, (simply referred to as human
positive laws) both civil and criminal laws, are
those enacted by men to guide their
actuations in society and in relation to one
another. They regulate man’s external actions.
Their objective is peace and order and material
prosperity. They presume moral laws.
II. CONSCIENCE (Subjective Norm of Morality)
it is the proximate norm of morality |
it is what confronts an action as good or bad
Function = to examine, judge and pass a
sentence on all moral actions
Etymology
from latin “conscientia” which means “trial of
oneself” both in accusation and defense
Definition
an act of practical judgment of reason
deciding upon an individual action as good
and to be performed or as evil to be avoided
Practical judgment
it is an interference whose conclusion leads to
something practicable
because its function is to “determine what
ought to be done in a given situation.” = after
the commission of an act, the conscience
assumes the role of approving or reproaching
it is also a practical judgment because it is an
interference leading to a practicable
conclusion = as an interferential reasoning, it
makes use of the principles of natural law.
Thus, the conscience is but an extension of
the Natural Law which guides man to seek the
good of his nature
KINDS OF CONSCIENCE
1) CORRECT OR TRUE
judges what is good as good and what is evil as
evil
2) ERRONEOUS OR FALSE
judges incorrectly that what is good is evil and
what is evil is good.
Factor from which errors in conscience flows:
Mistake in inferential thinking (such as deriving a
wrong conclusion from a wrong principles)
Ignorance of the Law
Ignorance of the Fact and other circumstances
modifying human actions
Ignorance of future consequences especially those
dependent on the freewill of others
Inculpable Conscience – error is not willfully
intended
Culpable Conscience – if error is due to neglect
or malice
Difference between them:
the distinction between voluntary and
involuntary error
culpable = voluntary
inculpable = involuntary = honest mistake
3) CERTAIN
subjective assurance of the lawfulness or lawlessness
of a certain act
the person is sure of his/her decision
it is possible however to be sure of something as god
when in fact it is just the opposite, and vice-versa
Theologians – believed that a certain conscience
should always be followed so as to preserve the
integrity of the human reason – to contradict is morally
guilty.
4) DOUBTFUL
a vacillating conscience, unable to form a definite
judgment on a certain action.
it should be first allowed to settle its doubts before
resorting to action
5) SCRUPULOUS
a rigorous conscience – extremely afraid of
committing evil
meticulous and wants inconvertible proofs
before it acts
6) LAX
one which refuses to be bothered about the
distinction of good and evil
rushes on and is quick to justify itself
having this kind of conscience, one follows
the impulse of “bahala na” attitude on matters
of morals
FORMATION OF CONSCIENCE
It is our obligation to cultivate a clear and true
conscience = we can accomplish it:
a) Studying and searching for truths in the laws and in
the sciences
b) Cultivation of good habits – this means that the
practical truths we discover must be internalized and
then externalized in actions
c) Militate against evil, condemning it where we find it
– not only turn our back on evil but to fight against it
d) Developing proper use of freedom
Human Freedom – if it is true freedom in action, it is
not submission to the coercive pressure of external
force, but self-fulfillment through inner love of the
good in accordance with the pattern of divine holiness
which is the eternal law reflected in man’s own nature
CONCLUSION
Conscience = our exalted participation in the
eternal law of God because its function is to
reveal our likeness our likeness to God. It is
therefore, the voice of God within us.
it is compulsory – because it operates within the
realm of truth and sound reason = only when it
impels us to act according to our rational
insights that it is truly the voice of God – but if
it deviates from the correct norm, it ceases to
be rational and no longer now the voice of God.
As long as it operates according to sound
rational insight = it is infallible, it should then
be followed
Conscience – insofar as it is the “voice of
God” - it assumes the authority of God. God
is the ultimate norm to which conscience
must conform to.