Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views39 pages

Chapter 8

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views39 pages

Chapter 8

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39

Part 2

Principles of Passive Management and Asset Pricing

2
Chapter 8
Risky asset pricing models
and the CAPM

3
Learning objectives
• After completing this chapter you should be able to:
– intuitively understand the:
• capital market line (CML)
• capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and the security market line
(SML)
• link between the CML and SML
– apply the CAPM in pricing risky assets including shares

4
Learning objectives (cont.)
– use the CAPM and justify values for relevant input parameters
– understand the importance of assumptions underlying the CAPM
– explain the difficulties associated with testing the CAPM
– debate whether the CAPM is an appropriate model to price risky
assets.

5
Chapter outline
1 Introduction
2 The capital asset pricing model (CAPM)
3 Using the CAPM
4 Testing the CAPM
5 Extensions to the CAPM
6 Summary

6
1 Introduction
• This chapter addresses how an investor can determine the
appropriate return required for a particular asset.
– In a competitive market, price is set by interaction of supply
and demand.
– This price should be commensurate with the risk of the asset.
• That is, how much return is sufficient to compensate investors for
holding the asset.

7
2 The capital asset pricing model
(CAPM)
• Capital market line (CML)
– Equation of CML:
E(Ri) = Rf + si(E(Rm)-Rf)/sm
– Assumptions:
• Investors are risk averse, maximise utility, and face one period
horizon.
• Investors are only interested in risk and return, and have access to
unlimited borrowing and lending at Rf
• That there are no transaction costs or taxes.
• Investments are infinitely divisible.

8
2 The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) (cont.)
2 The capital asset pricing model
(CAPM) (cont.)
• Determine:
– how the aggregate of investors will behave
– how market clearing prices and returns are set
– the relevant measure of risk
– the relationship between risk and return for any asset when
markets are in equilibrium.

10
2 The capital asset pricing model
(CAPM) (cont.)
• The capital assessing price model (CAPM) was developed by
Sharpe, Lintner and Mossin in 1965.
• Security market line (SML)
– E(Ri) = Rf + bi(E(Rm)-Rf)
where bi = Covi,m/s2m

11
2 The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) (cont.)
3 Using the CAPM
• Given the CAPM equation, E(Ri) = Rf + bi(E(Rm)-Rf), the
following inputs are needed to apply the CAPM:
– Rf: risk-free rate
– E(Rm)-Rf : market risk premium
– bi : beta specific to the asset.

13
3 Using the CAPM (cont.)
• Risk-free rate
– Risk-free rate should have a duration equal to the asset
life.
– CAPM is a one-period model.
– To take a long-term security is typical.
– To remove risk, government bonds are used (but note
these still have some risk).

14
3 Using the CAPM (cont.)
• Risk-free rate (cont.)
– Using a long-term government bond (e.g. 10-year
Commonwealth bond) is common.
– Risk-free rate varies over time.
– To smooth volatility, an average is often employed.
• E.g. the average over the last 40 trading days.

15
3 Using the CAPM (cont.)
• Market risk premium
– This requires an estimate of E(Rm)-Rf.
– Ex-ante estimates are often made using ex-post returns.
– Using a historical average is typical.
• However, history provides varying estimates:
– Ibbotson in USA: 8.4% pa.
– Other estimates: 5-9% pa.

16
3 Using the CAPM (cont.)
• Market risk premium
– Australia:
• Officer: 7.9% pa.
• Dimson et al: 7.6% pa.
– Recent study:
• 1882–2005
• Brailsford et al: 6% pa.

17
3 Using the CAPM (cont.)
• Beta
– Beta estimates can be supplied through commercial vendors
– Beta estimates can be calculated directly
• require returns on the asset (such as a share)
• require returns on a market index
– e.g. S&P/ASX 200 index
– use accumulation index (includes dividends).

18
3 Using the CAPM (cont.)
• Beta (cont.)
– From the CAPM, bi = covi,m/s2m
since: covi,m = ri,m . si . Sm
therefore: bi = ri,m . si /s2m
hence, Beta can be estimated using the following regression: E(R i) = ai
+ bi(E(Rm,t) + ei,t.

– Beta estimates are imprecise:


• They vary according to data used for estimation.
• Thin trading creates bias.
• They vary over time for same firm.
– Using five years of monthly returns is typical.

19
4 Testing the CAPM
• Early tests of CAPM
– Regress current returns against estimates of beta from past return
series:
R*i = a0 + a1bi + ei
where R*i = Ri – Rf.
– Tests focused on:
• a0 = 0 (CAPM should completely explain return)
• bi explaining return variation in total, and a linear relationship
in beta
• a1 = risk premium
• positive market risk premium, i.e. E(Rm)>Rf.

20
4 Testing the CAPM (cont.)
• Early tests of CAPM (cont.)
– Evidence generally found:
• a1 was statistically significant
– i.e. positive relationship between risk and return
• a0 also statistically significant
– (should be 0)- other factors in pricing assets.

21
4 Testing the CAPM (cont.)
• Early tests of CAPM (cont.)
– Tests of CAPM require an estimate of market return.
– Roll (1977) argued that the market cannot be observed in total.
– Even if possible, tests of CAPM are a test of the efficiency of the
market.
– There are techniques to avoid some of these problems.

22
4 Testing the CAPM (cont.)
• Early tests of CAPM (cont.)
– Problems with testing the CAPM
1. CAPM is an ex-ante model
– tests can only be done on ex-post data
2. Return estimation
- arithmetic/geometric/continuous
- choice of Rf
3. Beta estimation – stability, thin trading
4. Survivorship bias.

23
4 Testing the CAPM (cont.)
• Average stock returns are positively related to market.
• Fama and French (1992)
– 50 year analysis in the USA
• after controlling for size, there is actually a negative
relationship between beta and realised return.

24
4 Testing the CAPM (cont.)
• Beta is dead
– Subsequent studies have provided evidence that conflicts with
Fama and French (1992).
– Concerns include:
• CAPM provides for expected returns not actual returns
• criticism of data mining
• Roll’s problem of an inaccurate market proxy
• a poor proxy will create low correlation and hence low beta; high
betas are relatively less affected an hence SML is flat.

25
5 Extensions of the CAPM
• Researchers have investigated the impact of relaxing the CAPM
assumptions:
– investors make decisions on mean and variance, (normal distribution)
– all assets are marketable
– existence of risk-free asset
– perfect capital markets
– unequal borrowing and lending rates
– zero taxes and transactions costs
– homogenous expectations
– one-period horizon.

26
5 Extensions of the CAPM (cont.)
• Non-normal distribution
– Kraus and Litzenberger (1976)
– Adjust CAPM
• If returns are positive skewed, reduce expected return.
• If returns are negative skewed, increase expected return.
• Non-marketable assets
– Mayers (1972) provides an adjustment to CAPM for thin trading.

27
5 Extensions of the CAPM (cont.)

• Taxes
– CAPM is usually applied to after company tax before personal tax
(to make it easier to identify cash flows).
– Under imputation, distinctions between personal taxes and
corporate taxes are no longer independent.
– Taxes adjust CAPM.

28
5 Extensions of the CAPM (cont.)
• Taxes (cont.)
– Under the assumption of a closed economy and an unchanged risk-
free rate, the after corporate tax (but before personal tax) CAPM
becomes:
• E(Re,i) = Rf/e + be,i[E(rm)m/e - Rf/e]
• where
– E(Re) is the after-corporate-tax return on the share given an imputation
tax system
– E(rm) is the after-corporate-tax return on the market given imputation tax
system.

29
5 Extensions of the CAPM (cont.)
• Taxes (cont.)
– e = [Xsu + Xsf/(1-tc) + tgXsg]
– m = [Xmu + Xmf/(1-tc) + tgXmg]
– where
• tg = capital gains tax rate set to 0.5 of the personal tax rate (t p).
• tc = corporate tax rate.
• xsu = proportion of share return consisting of unfranked dividends.
• xsf = proportion of share return consisting of franked dividends.

30
5 Extensions of the CAPM (cont.)
• Taxes (cont.)
– xsg = proportion of share return consisting of capital gains.
– xmu = proportion of market return consisting of unfranked dividends.
– xmf = proportion of market return consisting of franked dividends.
– xmg = proportion of market return consisting of capital gains.
– Note: By definition, xsu + xsf + xsg = 1, and xmu + xmf + xmg = 1.

31
5 Extensions of the CAPM (cont.)

• No risk-free asset
– Return on govt. bonds is usually used as proxy.
– CAPM can be derived using a zero beta portfolio.
• Transaction costs
– Difficult to gauge impact but if a marginal trader is a large
institution with low trans. costs, then impact is likely to be
small.

32
5 Extensions of the CAPM (cont.)
5 Extensions of the CAPM (cont.)
• Heterogeneous (non-homogeneous) expectations
– can be dealt with under CAPM.
• Multi-period investment horizon
– CAPM can be extended to multi-period.
– a complex model and not generally used in practice.

34
6 Summary
• Start with CML, which prices efficient portfolios.
• Link CML to the SML.
• CAPM allows for pricing of inefficient portfolios such as single
assets.
• Different assets are distinguished only by variations in b.
• The application of CAPM relies critically on the input parameter
values.

35
6 Summary (cont.)
• Early evidence is supportive of at least the zero beta
CAPM or single index model.
• A fundamental difficulty lies with identifying the
appropriate proxy (Roll’s critique).
• Recent evidence does not support CAPM, especially over
long horizons.

36
6 Summary (cont.)
• Other factors that appear relevant to pricing are:
– size
– book-to-market.
• CAPM is a one period model with restrictive assumptions.
• CAPM is most widely used to price equation for equities.
• If we reject the CAPM what other model do we use?

37
Online video activity
• Title: Asset Pricing Empirical Tests
• Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyDWtWyCiBY
• Concept: Asset pricing
• Clip description: This video summarises some empirical studies about
asset pricing theory
• Points to consider: Try to search online for more detailed articles about
CAPM
Online video activity
• Title: How the SML (Security Market Line) works
• Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7Mtqh18DlA
• Concept: Security market line
• Clip description: This video provide an overview for how the SML
(Security Market Line) works.
• Points to consider: Could you tell the difference between the CML and
SML?

You might also like