Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views23 pages

CH 03

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views23 pages

CH 03

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Chapter 3

The Problem of Dual Diagnosis


Dual Diagnosis and Comorbidity
• Comorbidity
– Combinations of any types of psychiatric disorders
that co-occur in the same individual
• Dual diagnosis
– Describes individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for
a mental disorder(s) along with one or more
substance use disorders
• More than half of patients in psychiatric
treatment meet criteria for more than one
diagnosis
Methodological Issues in the
Assessment of Dual Diagnosis
• Sample selection influences findings

• Clinical sample vs. general population

• Berkson’s fallacy
Dual Diagnosis: Methodological Issues

• Factors that affect rates of dual diagnosis:


– Demographics (e.g., age and sex)
• Males and those of younger age are more likely to
abuse substances
– Inpatient or outpatient status and chronicity of illness
• More severely impaired inpatients (e.g., schizophrenics)
are less likely to abuse substances than are patients
who are less ill
– Setting
• Hospital emergency rooms reflect higher estimates
than other settings
Dual Diagnosis: Methodological Issues

• Definitions of what constitutes dual diagnosis


are far from uniform
– Studies often use differing definitions and
measures of substance use disorders, making
prevalence rates diverse and difficult to compare
Dual Diagnosis: Methodological Issues

• Methods used to determine psychiatric and


substance use diagnoses can influence findings
– Research with clinical samples will often employ
less-standardized assessments
– Assessments measure different substances in their
assessments of dual diagnosis
• Split between the mental health and substance
abuse treatment systems impacts dual-
diagnosis research
High Rates of Dual Diagnosis
• Exist in community samples
– Overall, studies find that a psychiatric diagnosis
yields at least double the risk of a lifetime alcohol
or drug use disorder
• Rates of dual diagnosis persist over time
• Changes in definitions (DSM-5) will impact
prevalence rates of dual diagnosis in future
research
General Psychiatric Patients
• Highest rates are among patients with severe mental
illnesses
– Bipolar disorder
• 45% have an alcohol use disorder and 39% have a drug use disorder
– Schizophrenia or paranoid disorders
• 42% have an alcohol use disorder and 38% have another substance
use disorder
• Other patient groups
– Major depression
• 33% have an alcohol use disorder and 18% have a drug use disorder
– Anxiety disorders
• 19% have an alcohol use disorder and 11% have another substance
use disorder
Dual Diagnosis: Patients With Primary Substance Use Disorders

• High rates of dual disorders across diverse


samples of patients seeking substance abuse
treatment
• Treatment-seeking substance abusers show high
rates of both major depression and bipolar
disorder
• Comorbid patients showed greater problems at
baseline (more disabled, drank more heavily)
than did substance-abuse-only patients
– Difference persisted at 3-month follow-up
Dual Diagnosis: Impact on
Patient Functioning

• Impacts the severity and course of many


disorders, especially among patients with serious
mental illnesses
– Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and recurrent major
depression
• More frequent hospitalizations and more relapses
for comorbid substance abusers
• Poorer overall life functioning
– Social stability
– Health quality
– Life satisfaction
Dual Diagnosis: Impact on
Patient Functioning

• Cognitive functioning
– Chronic or sustained substance use can contribute to
cognitive impairment and resulting brain dysfunction
– Overall, no difference on composite scores of
cognitive functioning exist between individuals with
schizophrenia with or without an SUD
– Significantly more work is needed to understand the
specifics of cognitive functioning in dual disorders
both with regard to preexisting impairment as well
as a sequelae of chronic substance use
Dual Diagnosis: Impact on
Patient Functioning

• Treatment noncompliance
– Substance use often interferes with compliance with both
behavioral and pharmacological treatments
– Linked to poorer outcomes
• Violence
– Substance use and its associated noncompliance with
treatment is also linked to greater risk for violence
– Risk for violent crime among individuals with bipolar
disorder is almost entirely due to substance abuse
comorbidity
• Those with bipolar-only diagnoses show extremely low risk for
violent crime
Dual Diagnosis: Impact on
Patient Functioning

• Suicide
– Lifetime rates of suicide attempts were higher for those with dual
bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorders (25.29%) than for
respondents with bipolar disorder alone (14.78%)
– Psychiatric inpatients with major depressive disorder and a
substance use disorder had higher levels of suicidal ideation
• Service utilization and health care cost
– Increased rate of treatment seeking
– Patients with dual diagnoses had psychiatric treatment costs that
were approximately 60% higher than the costs of psychiatrically
impaired individuals without substance abuse
– Yet poorer outcomes often associated with short-term treatment,
noncompliance, and lack of integrated care
Dual Diagnosis: Impact on
Patient Functioning
• Physical illness
– Individuals with dual diagnosis show increased risk
for HIV and AIDS
• People with schizophrenia and other severe mental
illness are now one of the highest-risk groups
– Substance use substantially increases the
likelihood of unsafe sex practices and other high-
risk behaviors (injection drug use) in those with
mental illness
Dual Diagnosis: Impact on
Patient Functioning
• Legal problems
– While rates of arrest are high, patients are four times
more likely to have encounters with the legal system that
do not result in arrest
• Continued substance abuse over a long-term follow-up
period was significantly associated with a greater likelihood
of arrest
• Homelessness
– Patients are more likely to live in an unstable housing
situation or to be homeless
– Those with mental illness and substance abuse are more
than 4 times as likely to be homeless than are patients
who did not abuse substances
Dual Diagnosis: Impact on
Patient Functioning

• Issues for Women


– Those with comorbid severe mental illness and
substance abuse show:
• Poorer retention in treatment
• Elevated levels of anxiety, depression, and medical
illness
• More difficult to engage in treatment and are
underrepresented in treatment overall
• Higher rates of sexual and physical victimization than
the general population
Interpretation of Psychopathology and Treatment Outcome Research

• The overall result of screening out those with


substance use disorders is that there are very few
data to inform treatment
– Given the significant rates of dual disorders found in
clinical samples, such an omission is clearly
problematic
– It is unclear how well findings will generalize to the
larger population of individuals with a particular
disorder if patients with dual diagnoses are not
included
• Solutions involve statistical analyses
Dual Disorders: Assessment
and Diagnosis

• Symptom overlap
– Symptoms of many psychiatric disorders overlap
with those of substance use disorders
• For example, DSM lists problems in social functioning as
symptoms of both schizophrenia and substance use
disorders
• Criteria counting toward multiple diagnoses can
potentially increase comorbidity rates and can make a
diagnosis of substance abuse difficult
Dual Disorders: Assessment
and Diagnosis

• Substance-induced disorders may resemble


psychiatric disorders
– Because symptoms of substance use and
withdrawal can resemble psychiatric symptoms,
differential diagnosis may be confounded
– Incorrect treatment decisions may be made if
interventions are aimed at what appear to be
acute symptoms of psychiatric disorder but are in
fact substance-induced symptoms
Theories of Dual Diagnosis
• Common factors models
– Some shared influence is responsible for the
development of both psychiatric and substance use
disorders (e.g., genetic)
– Twin, adoption, and family studies clearly show that
both mental illness and substance abuse run in families
– Studies of familial transmission for comorbid
psychiatric and substance use disorders find little
evidence for a common genetic factor
– Family history may inspire both dysfunctional family
interactions and inheritance of deviant personality
traits
• Borderline personality disorder and substance use disorders
Theories of Dual Diagnosis
• Causal models: Secondary substance use disorder
model
– Self-medication model
• Patients with psychiatric disorders use substances to self-
medicate and relieve discomfort associated with the primary
psychiatric disorder
– Social facilitation model
• Patients with severe mental illness may have fewer
opportunities for social interaction, and substance abuse helps
the process of social engagement in patients who lack
appropriate social and interpersonal skills
– Neurobiological mechanisms
• Neurobiological deficits and abnormalities that provide the basis
for different forms of mental illness may also predispose for
substance abuse
Theories of Dual Diagnosis
• Causal models: Secondary psychiatric disorder
model
• Substance abuse causes psychopathology
• Substance-induced psychiatric disorder
• Chronic alcohol use causes depression, but how?
– Considerable life stress that alcohol dependence promotes for
the drinker
– Pharmacological properties of alcohol as a depressant
substance
Theories of Dual Diagnosis
• Bidirectional models
– Suggest that either psychiatric or substance use
disorders can increase risk and exacerbate the
impact of the other
– Alcohol and anxiety interact to produce an
exacerbation of both anxiety symptoms and drinking
– Feed-forward cycle
• Drinking is promoted by the short-term, anxiety-reducing
effects of alcohol
• At the same time, anxiety symptoms are worsened by
heavy drinking, leading to continued drinking in response
to these worsened anxiety symptoms

You might also like