Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views22 pages

Personality Assessment

The document discusses personality assessment, outlining its importance in identifying client issues, enhancing self-awareness, and guiding treatment decisions. It categorizes assessment methods into informal (observation and interviewing) and formal (structured instruments and projective techniques), detailing specific tools like MMPI-2, NEO-PI-3, and MBTI. The document also highlights the strengths and limitations of both standardized and projective techniques in personality evaluation.

Uploaded by

mier meow
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views22 pages

Personality Assessment

The document discusses personality assessment, outlining its importance in identifying client issues, enhancing self-awareness, and guiding treatment decisions. It categorizes assessment methods into informal (observation and interviewing) and formal (structured instruments and projective techniques), detailing specific tools like MMPI-2, NEO-PI-3, and MBTI. The document also highlights the strengths and limitations of both standardized and projective techniques in personality evaluation.

Uploaded by

mier meow
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

PERSONALITY

ASSESSMENT
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT
 Personality
 What is it?
 How can it best be measured?

 Personality assessment can:


 Help identify client problems
 Help client to know more about themselves
 Help select interventions
 Assist in treatment decisions
 Assist in structuring counseling relationship
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT

 Informal personality assessments:


 Observation
 Interviewing

 Formal personality assessments:


 Structured personality instruments
 Projective techniques

Note: All personality assessments can be devided


into two categories of 1) assessing pathologies or
2) assessing normal personality types
INFORMAL ASSESSMENT
TECHNIQUES

 Observation:
 Mostcommonly used method of informal
assessment

 Counselor subjectivity
 Selective recall
 Selective interpretation
 Pre-existing assumptions

 Reliability & unsystematic error

 Validity – representativeness & generalizability


INFORMAL ASSESSMENT
TECHNIQUES

 Interviewing:
 Diagnostic vs. descriptive

 Consider quality of questions

 Reliability & validity concerns


STRUCTURED PERSONALITY
INVENTORIES
 Methods of constructing personality
inventories:
 Content-related procedure (what exactly we’re
looking for---normal vs. pathology)
 Personality theory (Freud)
 Empirical criterion keying (DSM)
 Factor analysis (i.e 5 factors)

 Instruments most often used by counselors:


 Minnesota Multiphasic Personality
Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) (pathology)
 NEO PersonalityInventory-3 (NEO-PI-3) (normal)
 Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI) (normal)
MMPI-2 (FOUNDATION OF PB
DEVELOPMENT)
 Criterion-keyed instrument, used to diagnose
emotional disorders

 Norming group of 2,600 selected to match 1980


census data, debate exists about racial bias

 567 items  “true,” “false,” or “cannot say”

 Contains validity scales, 3 types of clinical


scales: Basic, Content, and Special scales
MMPI-2
 Validity scales:
 Cannot Say (?)
 True Response Inconsistency (TRIN)
 Variable Response Inconsistency (VRIN)
 Infrequency (F) - also Infrequency Back [F(B)] and
Psychopathology Infrequency [F(p)]
 Symptom Validity (FBS)
 Lie (L)
 Correction (K)
 Superlative Self-Presentation (S)
MMPI-2
 Basic/Clinical scales:
1. Hypochondriasis
2. Depression
3. Conversion Hysteria
4. Psychopathic Deviate
5. Masculinity-Femininity
6. Paranoia
7. Psychasthenia
8. Schizophrenia
9. Hypomania
10. Social Introversion
MMPI-2
MMPI-2: FINAL NOTES

 Clinicians require training, supervision and


license to practice psychology in order to use
 Concept of “Profile”

 Other MMPI-related instruments: California


Psychological Inventory (CPI), Personality
Inventory for Children - Second Edition
(PIC-2)
NEO-PI-3
 Research suggests indentified 5 major factors
of personality:
 I – Surgency (or Extroversion)
 II – Agreeableness
 III – Conscientiousness
 IV – Emotional Stability or (Neuroticism)
 V – Intellect (or Openness to Experience)

 Factors appear to apply across diverse


cultures
NEO-PI-3
 Some debate over appropriate names for the 5
factors

 Counselors should be aware of research on stability


of personality across the lifespan

 NEO-PI-3--useful for understanding clients,


assisting in empathy and rapport building,
providing feedback and insight, and selecting
appropriate treatment
 Not designed for assessing psychopathology!!!!!!
®
MBTI
 Widely-used
 Based on Jungian theory
 For individuals 14 years and older
 Typology instrument providing scores on
4 dichotomies, resulting in individuals
being categorized into one of 16
psychological types
®
MBTI
 Dichotomies:
 Extroversion – Introversion
 Sensing – Intuition
 Thinking – Feeling
 Judging – Perceiving
 For example: ISTJ/ISFJ/INTJ/INFJ

 Preferences on the 4 continuums result in a 4-letter code,


producing a personality type

 Chang over time

 Most recent version: Form Q/Step II  each dichotomy


further divided into five facets

 Counselors need to be familiar with reliability and validity


evidence for this instrument
OTHER STANDARDIZED PERSONALITY
INSTRUMENTS
 Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire
(16PF)
 Includes measures of 16 factors and 5 global
factors
 Version also exists for adolescents

 Jackson Personality Inventory – Revised


(JPI-R)
 15 subscales organized into 5 higher-order
clusters
 Psychometrically-sound and well-researched
LIMITATIONS OF
STANDARDIZED PERSONALITY
INSTRUMENTS

 Majority are self-report instruments


 Clients are able to distort results (“fake” good or
bad)
 Risk of response sets

 To increase validity of profiles:


 Inform client of purpose of inventory and how
results will be used
 Instruct client to answer each question honestly
 Ask him/her to focus on each of the questions
PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
 Provide client with relatively unstructured stimulus
– examiner records and interprets responses

 Based on psychoanalytic concept of projection –


individuals’ tendency to project their drives,
defenses, desires, and conflicts onto external
situations/stimuli

 Thought to uncover more of client’s unconscious


and, thus, provide an indication of covert or latent
traits
 More difficult to “fake” responses
PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES

 Includes significant subjectivity in


interpretation
 Extensive training needed to use them
appropriately
 Categories:
 Associations
 Construction
 Completions
 Arrangement/selection
 Expression
PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
 Association techniques:
 Rorschach Inkblot Test
 Construction techniques:
 Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
 Completion techniques:
 RotterIncomplete Sentences Blank, 2nd ed.
 Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study
PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES

 Arrangement/Selection techniques:
 Sandplay
 Other techniques involving play
 Expression techniques:
 Expressive Art Therapy: Music therapy, Art
therapy
 Drawing techniques
 Draw-a-Person Test (D-A-P)

 House-Tree-Person (H-T-P)

 Kinetic Family Drawing (K-F-D)


PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES
 Strengths:
 More difficult to fake
 Can sometimes identify more complex themes
and multidimensional aspects of personality
 Can serve as an effective method of
establishing rapport
 Helpful with children and nonverbal clients

 Limitations:
 Low reliability evidence
 More caution needed when interpreting results
 Meager validation information
 Lack of normative data
 Can be dangerous with untrained users

You might also like