Least Operators to Express Number - Problem

Imagine you're a mathematician with a unique challenge: you can only use a single number x to build mathematical expressions, but you can use it as many times as you want with basic operators!

The Challenge: Given a positive integer x and a target value, create an expression using only the number x and the operators +, -, *, and / that equals the target. Your goal is to use the minimum number of operators possible.

Rules:

  • You can only use the number x (as many times as needed)
  • Available operators: addition (+), subtraction (-), multiplication (*), division (/)
  • Follow standard order of operations (*, / before +, -)
  • No parentheses allowed
  • No unary negation (can't start with -x)
  • Division returns exact rational numbers

Example: With x = 3 and target = 19, one solution could be 3 * 3 * 3 - 3 - 3 - 3 + 3 which uses 6 operators, but there might be a more efficient way!

Input & Output

example_1.py — Basic Case
$ Input: x = 3, target = 19
Output: 5
💡 Note: One optimal solution is 3 * 3 + 3 * 3 + 3 / 3 which equals 9 + 9 + 1 = 19, using 5 operators (* + * + /). The expression follows order of operations: multiplications and division first, then addition.
example_2.py — Simple Target
$ Input: x = 5, target = 501
Output: 8
💡 Note: We can express 501 as 5 * 5 * 5 * 4 + 1, which is 5 * 5 * 5 * (5 - 1) + 1 = 125 * 4 + 1 = 501. This uses 8 operators total when properly expanded with only 5's and basic operators.
example_3.py — Edge Case
$ Input: x = 2, target = 1
Output: 1
💡 Note: The simplest way to get 1 using only 2's is 2 / 2 = 1, which uses exactly 1 operator (division). This is more efficient than using addition/subtraction approaches.

Constraints

  • 2 ≤ x ≤ 100
  • 1 ≤ target ≤ 2 × 108
  • All operations follow standard mathematical precedence
  • No parentheses are allowed in expressions
  • Division always yields exact rational results

Visualization

Tap to expand
Expression Building Strategy (x=3, target=19)199x² termCost: 29x² termCost: 21x⁰ termCost: 219 = 9 + 9 + 1Power Costs for x=3x⁰ = 1: Cost 2 (3/3)x¹ = 3: Cost 1 (3)x² = 9: Cost 2 (3*3)x³ = 27: Cost 3 (3*3*3)x⁴ = 81: Cost 4 (3*3*3*3)Total Cost: 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 opsExpression: 3*3 + 3*3 + 3/3🎯 Key StrategyExpress target as sum of powers: target = Σ(coefficient × xⁱ)Use DP to find minimum operators across all valid combinations
Understanding the Visualization
1
Identify Building Blocks
Calculate cost to build each power: x⁰=1 (costs 2: x/x), x¹=x (costs 1), x²=x×x (costs 2), etc.
2
Express as Sum
Try to write target = ±x^i ± remaining, where we choose the sign and power optimally
3
Recursive Breakdown
Solve the remaining part recursively, trying all feasible powers of x
4
Memoize Results
Cache solutions for each target value to avoid recomputation
5
Find Minimum
Return the minimum operators across all valid decompositions
Key Takeaway
🎯 Key Insight: Transform the problem into finding optimal coefficients for powers of x, where each power has a known construction cost. Dynamic programming with memoization ensures we don't recalculate the same subproblems.
Asked in
Google 45 Meta 32 Amazon 28 Microsoft 19
43.3K Views
Medium Frequency
~25 min Avg. Time
1.8K Likes
Ln 1, Col 1
Smart Actions
💡 Explanation
AI Ready
💡 Suggestion Tab to accept Esc to dismiss
// Output will appear here after running code
Code Editor Closed
Click the red button to reopen