Least Operators to Express Number - Problem
Imagine you're a mathematician with a unique challenge: you can only use a single number x to build mathematical expressions, but you can use it as many times as you want with basic operators!
The Challenge: Given a positive integer x and a target value, create an expression using only the number x and the operators +, -, *, and / that equals the target. Your goal is to use the minimum number of operators possible.
Rules:
- You can only use the number
x(as many times as needed) - Available operators: addition (+), subtraction (-), multiplication (*), division (/)
- Follow standard order of operations (*, / before +, -)
- No parentheses allowed
- No unary negation (can't start with -x)
- Division returns exact rational numbers
Example: With x = 3 and target = 19, one solution could be 3 * 3 * 3 - 3 - 3 - 3 + 3 which uses 6 operators, but there might be a more efficient way!
Input & Output
example_1.py — Basic Case
$
Input:
x = 3, target = 19
›
Output:
5
💡 Note:
One optimal solution is 3 * 3 + 3 * 3 + 3 / 3 which equals 9 + 9 + 1 = 19, using 5 operators (* + * + /). The expression follows order of operations: multiplications and division first, then addition.
example_2.py — Simple Target
$
Input:
x = 5, target = 501
›
Output:
8
💡 Note:
We can express 501 as 5 * 5 * 5 * 4 + 1, which is 5 * 5 * 5 * (5 - 1) + 1 = 125 * 4 + 1 = 501. This uses 8 operators total when properly expanded with only 5's and basic operators.
example_3.py — Edge Case
$
Input:
x = 2, target = 1
›
Output:
1
💡 Note:
The simplest way to get 1 using only 2's is 2 / 2 = 1, which uses exactly 1 operator (division). This is more efficient than using addition/subtraction approaches.
Constraints
- 2 ≤ x ≤ 100
- 1 ≤ target ≤ 2 × 108
- All operations follow standard mathematical precedence
- No parentheses are allowed in expressions
- Division always yields exact rational results
Visualization
Tap to expand
Understanding the Visualization
1
Identify Building Blocks
Calculate cost to build each power: x⁰=1 (costs 2: x/x), x¹=x (costs 1), x²=x×x (costs 2), etc.
2
Express as Sum
Try to write target = ±x^i ± remaining, where we choose the sign and power optimally
3
Recursive Breakdown
Solve the remaining part recursively, trying all feasible powers of x
4
Memoize Results
Cache solutions for each target value to avoid recomputation
5
Find Minimum
Return the minimum operators across all valid decompositions
Key Takeaway
🎯 Key Insight: Transform the problem into finding optimal coefficients for powers of x, where each power has a known construction cost. Dynamic programming with memoization ensures we don't recalculate the same subproblems.
💡
Explanation
AI Ready
💡 Suggestion
Tab
to accept
Esc
to dismiss
// Output will appear here after running code