AutoCAD Reviews & Product Details

As a tool that we have used for quite some time both for developing projects for third parties and for executing our own developments, it undoubtedly continues to provide us with the necessary value for both our Engineering department and the other technical departments within the organization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When it comes to other CAD/BIM tools, there are particularities that apply to our case (development of industrial electrical/electronic equipment and systems). In certain cases, features such as automation for generating certain types of reports (cabling, bill of materials, among others) are more cumbersome in AutoCAD than in other platforms that are direct competitors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like AutoCAD for its versatile features that simplify complex designing tasks. The options like trim and circle commands are particularly beneficial, making it straightforward to modify and create precise designs effortlessly. I find the availability of a wide range of tools and options within easy reach on the toolbar very convenient, as it aids in making instant drawings and streamlining my workflow. It's user-friendly interface makes locating and utilizing various tools a breeze, which is a significant contributor to making my designing tasks easier. Additionally, AutoCAD's ability to perform both 2D and 3D drawings efficiently stands out and substantially reduces the time and effort required for drawing complex designs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes, there are issues with one or two commands not working properly in AutoCAD, leading to alignment problems. To resolve this, I need to reset all commands and start from scratch with preferences, which can be quite time-consuming. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best is its status as the unwavering industry standard for 2D technical documentation, its accuracy, reliability, and precision are absolute - it is the digital ruler and compass for millions of architects, Engineers, and designers. The DWG file format is universally accepted, making collaboration with consultants, contractors, and suppliers seamless, regardless of their native CAD platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The primary point of frustration is the significant subscription cost combined with its resources-intensive performance on large files. While the software is powerful, it often requires high-end hardware and can notoriously slow to load or process complex drawings, leading to lost time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCAD is the best, I was introduced to it in my university, and I have been using it for almost 18 years. It is my favorite drafting tool, because it is precise and its files are light and compatible with most architectural softwares. I like how I can control the quality of the documentation and printing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't think it can be defined as a dislike, but I guess sometimes this software can be easily misused. It's hard to identify 3D lines in 2D spaces. Per example some users use topographic info to draw a site plan, and this can generate errors. It would be amazing if 3D elements had a flag to identify them quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCAD remains a reliable tool for quick drafting, especially in early design stages or when we need to produce simple linework fast. It’s also helpful when coordinating with consultants or contractors who haven’t transitioned to BIM and still require DWG files. I appreciate its precision and flexibility for 2D work — sometimes it’s just faster to sketch something out in AutoCAD before moving into Revit. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For BIM workflows, AutoCAD is limited. It doesn’t offer the parametric or collaborative power of Revit, and working in 2D increases the risk of inconsistencies. Layer management can also get messy in larger files, and the lack of a central model means more manual coordination. We only use it where absolutely necessary, mainly for external coordination. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like AutoCAD's infinite space where I can draw anything, which is great for creating detailed design and plan layouts of buildings. It makes it easy to explain detailed plans since I am a civil engineer. I also appreciate the many features and shortcuts that make it easy to draw any plan, like building foundations, beams, columns, and elevations. I've been using this software for more than two years, and I can't think of my life without it. It's the only source of income for me, which shows how reliant and integrated it is in my work. The initial setup of AutoCAD was easy for me, indicating its user-friendly nature. Till now, I'd give AutoCAD a 10 out of 10. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find AutoCAD's 3D visualization a little bit complex and difficult to use. It's also a bit time-consuming and hard for me to draw any complex type of structure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I primarily use AutoCAD for preparing and reviewing 2D drawings, and it's especially useful for quick drafting, mark-ups, and coordination during the design and execution stages. It helps maintain drawing accuracy, consistency, and clear communication between different project stakeholders. I like its reliability and precision; it's very stable for day-to-day drafting and works well even on complex drawings. I appreciate the ease of making quick edits, using layers effectively, and maintaining drawing standards, which saves a lot of time. AutoCAD integrates smoothly with other design and BIM tools, making it a dependable part of the overall design and coordination workflow. The initial setup was fairly easy, with a straightforward installation and licensing process, and the familiar interface allowed for quick onboarding and productivity ramp-up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCAD can feel a bit limited for complex 3D workflows, and handling very large or heavily referenced files can sometimes affect performance. The licensing cost is also on the higher side compared to some alternatives. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCAD is extremely reliable for creating precise 2D drawings and detailed 3D models. I like its wide range of drafting tools, layer management, and the flexibility it provides for different engineering, architectural, and mechanical applications. The software integrates well with other design tools, and its file compatibility (DWG, DXF, etc.) makes it easy to share projects. The command-based workflow is efficient once you get used to it, and the customization options with shortcuts, scripts, and plugins help improve productivity. The cloud storage and collaboration features also make it easier to work with teams across different locations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawback of AutoCAD is that it requires a high-performance system to run smoothly, especially for large projects, which can slow down older computers. The licensing cost is relatively expensive compared to other CAD software, which makes it less affordable for small businesses or individual freelancers. There’s also a steep learning curve for beginners because of the wide range of tools and commands. Sometimes, rendering and 3D modeling are not as advanced as dedicated 3D design software, so additional tools are required for complex projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have been using AutoCAD for only two months now, and so far, I am particularly impressed with the import feature and the direct input method feature. The import feature is especially beneficial as it allows me to use other works, tweak some settings, and use it for myself. This is crucial when there is very little time to create a design, and it's quite challenging if I don't know the basics. These features have significantly eased my learning process and project creation experience. Furthermore, the initial setup was hassle-free, as AutoCAD was already installed on my college lab computer, and for my personal PC, it was straightforward. Installing the software required minimal effort, as everything was handled by the system, making my start with AutoCAD smooth and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I face compatibility issues with AutoCAD. In my college, the computers have varying specifications, such as Intel i3 and dual-core processors. This inconsistency in hardware creates a high demand on the system to run AutoCAD efficiently. Despite some computers having 1TB of storage, AutoCAD struggles to perform, running as if it's on its last legs. This makes it difficult to work effectively, and I experience frequent performance issues with the software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

During high school, I used AutoCAD and appreciated its precision and versatility for both 2D and 3D design work. Once you get the hang of the basics, it becomes quite user-friendly, making it easier to produce detailed technical drawings for mechanical and engineering projects. I think it’s an excellent tool for both students and professionals. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCAD can sometimes feel overwhelming for beginners, as mastering all the commands takes time. Additionally, it demands a powerful computer to operate efficiently, particularly when working with large files. Despite these challenges, it remains one of the top design tools for achieving precise results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.