Just a few decades ago, almost every part of President Donald Trump’s plan to control immigration and expel illegals would have been uncontroversial. President Eisenhower’s Operation Wetback, which bought another decade of life for white America, did not face serious political opposition. President Ronald Reagan’s disastrous amnesty was sold as a border control measure, with supposedly harsh sanctions against hiring illegals. The Barbara Jordan Commission on Immigration Reform, chaired by an important black woman and a fierce progressive, called for policies that today would be considered far-right. Historically, it is taken for granted that the federal government enforces immigration laws and that states and cities comply.
That’s no longer true because many areas of the country have ceased to be part of the American nation in any meaningful way. Some cities and states are trying to nullify American immigration law, and more cities and states will join them. Los Angeles County declared a “state of emergency,” not because of crime or a national disaster but because of ICE raids.
The county government will now use taxpayer money for legal aid for illegals and to offer “rent relief” to those who have “fallen behind” because of raids. This may lead to an “eviction moratorium” in Los Angeles — another example of anarcho-tyranny, where illegal immigrants wouldn’t have to pay rent while landlords couldn’t evict them. “This isn’t the first time sanctuary politicians in Los Angeles have put law-breakers ahead of Americans,” said a spokesperson for DHS. “Our law enforcement should be thanked by the [Los Angeles] board of supervisors — not demonized.”
In Chicago, Governor JB Pritzker said that ICE officers might be prosecuted by a future Democratic administration:
The tables will turn one day. These people should recognize that maybe they’re not gonna get prosecuted today, although we’re looking at doing that, but they may get prosecuted after the Trump administration because the statute of limitations would not have run out. We’re talking to the state’s attorneys and Attorney General to see how they can go at this . . . .
In other words, the law will be used to prevent immigration laws from being enforced. The state of Illinois is considering banning federal immigration officials from making arrests at state courthouses, and wants to stop agents from entering schools without first notifying parents. The state would also expand existing prohibitions on state and local law enforcement working with ICE.
The federal government is shut down over what the White House calls a fight over funding medical care for illegals. The Democrats insist that illegals are ineligible for government coverage, but there are ways for them to get it. The federal government subsidizes emergency medicine for illegals, and some are eligible for other programs.
The One Big Beautiful Bill cracked down on this, and the Democrats forced this shutdown to remove those provisions. Politically, Democrats do not want to admit they want to pay for medical care for illegals; they want it done through various loopholes and fine print. Progressives such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are finding it hard to stick to the script, simultaneously insisting on CNN that Republicans are lying about illegals getting medical benefits but also saying that they are a human right and everyone should get treatment regardless of status or insurance.
The idea of “law” becomes vague when everything is reduced to power. Many Democrats and some Republicans do not want to enforce immigration law because they benefit from either the voting habits of the newcomers or from cheap labor. Thus, those who enforce immigration laws are hampered by the institutions of the government itself and could even be prosecuted.
Criminal justice is fragmenting along racial lines. New York Attorney General Letitia “Tish” James famously ran for office with a promise to prosecute “that man in the White House,” ultimately winning a case based on an extremely technical and controversial real-estate law.
Now, it appears that Miss James may be guilty of mortgage fraud, a crime she has prosecuted. CNN’s Kasie Hunt defended her, suggesting that just about all home-buyers fudge their mortgage applications. Similar defenses were common among Republicans when New York was trying to dismantle Mr. Trump’s business empire — noting that businesses routinely overvalue their properties when they are used as collateral for loans — but at that time, the media line was that the law must apply to everyone. Now, the New York political leadership is rallying behind Letitia James and claiming she is a victim of political retribution.
The Democrats are right in that the case probably is political retribution. The same could be said of Letitia James’s crusade against Mr. Trump, or for that matter, VDARE.com or the National Rifle Association. Whether the defendants broke any rules is almost irrelevant, if charges are brought for political reasons. White advocates can take solace that the Trump Administration is unlikely to prosecute us out of spite, but should remember that Letitia James could have been US Attorney General under a President Kamala Harris.
For now, we have the spectacle of the Department of Homeland Security faulting the Democrats for shutting down the government to protect aliens, siding with criminals, and attacking law enforcement. For those who think illegal immigration and crime must be combatted, it is hard to disagree. Democrats seem to be all but championing the foreign invasion, and insisting on ignoring widespread violation of immigrations laws they themselves helped pass.
It is not an exaggeration to say that the Democrat Party represents foreigners, non-whites, and those who favor dispossession of the white American nation. It champions the racial and foreign interests of groups within its coalition. The other party — currently in charge of the federal government — is the de facto representative of the larger white population, but due to its own elites and financial donors, explicitly opposes white racial consciousness. The best it can do is fall back on “traditional” American symbols that inspire mostly whites. This has mass appeal; about 175,000 Americans have applied to join ICE.
If JB Pritzker gets his way, those who join may eventually face prosecution from someone like Letitia James. People as different as Nick Fuentes and Curtis Yarvin have warned that if the Left returns to power, its vengeance will be far more vicious than anything the Trump Administration has done. This administration’s hope for mass deportations and a permanent, loyal immigration-control bureaucracy would require almost a decade in power. Congress may help. The Supreme Court could pare back the provisions of the Voting Rights Act that are effectively affirmative action for black politicians. This could give the GOP a dozen new seats in the House and frustrate any Democratic plan to neuter the administration.
Democrat insistence that non-white cities and states can nullify national immigration laws cannot be tolerated. At the same time, Democrats will not back down from the claim that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian intent on forcing fascism on the country. Mass deportations combined with the loss of specialized minority Congressional districts could endanger political prospects for the Democrats. In the long term, demographic change favors Democrats, but in the short-term, their radical base is likely to take more extreme, self-defeating actions if it faces more defeats in the existing system.
What may be emerging is something similar to antebellum America: The system cannot contain the conflict. The legitimacy of the state itself is coming into question — a casualty of the disastrous decision to turn America into a multiracial mess. The new nullification may not lead to a “civil war,” as some excitable pundits claim, but it will undoubtedly lead to more chaos, more intrusive government, more conflict, and more doubt in the system. One’s own liberty and personal property may now depend on the outcome of elections, which is common in the Third World. Thanks to the Great Replacement, we are increasingly part of that world.
I must agree that government agents should not be entering schools, just as they should not be entering homes, uninvited. These agents can carry out their duties elsewhere.
Then there is the question of the struggle for power between the two major parties. This is what our government has come to. It is who wields the power. The power to do whatsoever they want to do. To do this to us. To countries around the world. They both change the definition of words to suit their desires, with the Supreme Court to defend them with whatever they do. Anyone with any sense of honesty has to see that the government has become little more than a banquet of delight for whichever party holds the majority.
Kevin DeAnna is the most level-headed, honest, and prescient individual now writing on present day America.
In his articles one reads, in impeccable English, the whole unvarnished truth of our national catastrophe.
What can we ‘do’ with that truth?
Anything?
God help us!
“Then there is the question of the struggle for power between the two major parties.’
There is only one party, and it is privately owned.
” It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it!”
One’s house is protected by the Fourth Amendment, just as one’s person is.
Schools are not, not should they be, any more than football stadiums.
Why you wish to imagine a Fourth Amendment protection for public institutions is beyond me.
I’ve reread this article and other articles by Mr. DeAnna on TUR. Let me revise my comment. I wrote:
Let me omit the word ‘whole.’ Mr. DeAnna does not ‘name the jew’ in this or, seemingly, any of his articles.
Kevin DeAnna, like Jared Taylor, does not speak the whole truth. He speaks partial truth. Yes, what he writes is true, but nonetheless he, like Taylor, can justly be accused of lying by omission.
The Commies know what they’re doing. The Jews revealed this scheme many years ago in the movie ‘The Devil’s Advocate’ (1997) where Pacino playing the Devil exclaims how the plan is for the lawyers (jews) to continuously acquit all the scum & precipitate the collapse of society into social chaos–thus dissolving white civilization & morphing it into a Judeo-Communist wog dystopia. Of course, the film doesn’t explicitly state anything about a ‘Judeo-Communist wog dystopia’ but what other outcome can there be from these policies? They want a new communist system for the entire West, just like they have in present day Germany or Russia where every city square has a Lenin statue or Karl Marx St & where you’re imprisoned for denying the Hoaxlocaust fable. That’s what they want in the US too. Of course the ‘Devil’ gets blamed for all this in the film, not the Jews & their god Yahweh.
A bit to unpack.
OpWet was over 70 years ago. More than ‘just a few decades’. Almost a century, spanning Lost, Greatest, Silent, and Boomer gens. The point is not trivial, but underscores a naive historical perspective typical among Amrenners and Vdare types. The land has indeed changed, but like the author, they continue to navigate using an outdated map.
What Brimelow and Taylor’s group simply don’t get, is that what was, is now long-gone, and it’s never coming back, at least in any recognizable form. How can one go forward without a grounding in reality? Affixed to a sentimental past, realistic prospects for the future cannot sustain.
This is low-level Brimelow. Talking about the ‘Historic American Nation’. In fact, there is no American Nation anymore. At least in any organic sense of the word. To even speak of the present with such a past in mind is foolish.
First, an editorial point: when citing sources it’s not a good idea to link to references behind a paywall. That aside, what is this supposed to mean? That LA is exceptional? Francis’s anarcho-tyranny has been going on for years, throughout the country. And recall, Sam’s article from Chronicles was written in the early ’90s.
I suppose, arguing as he does for a radical Federalism, that an irony lost to Deanna is how bastion of the North, supplier of human fodder to the erstwhile Union Army, Illinois, is now embracing States Rights.
The author’s distillation of the problem into a Republican-Democrat divide is low-level. Expecting an institutionalized two-party ‘solution’ to America’s current dilemma is beyond the point of absurdity. To even talk in these terms demonstrates an unseriousness that is astounding, given the situation that has existed in the US since at least 1865.
Yet inasmuch as the author blames Democrats, we can ask who the Republican party represents? Read on…
Reminds us of the old Lone Ranger joke. Surrounded by scalp-thirsty Indians, the masked Ranger says, “Well, I guess it’s just us against all these angry Indians.”
Tonto replying, “What you mean ‘us’, kemosabe?”
If the Orange Head is too busy to ‘prosecute us’, does that mean he’s on ‘your’ side? And if he is too busy, it’s probably because he’s spending his time in Israel, joking about how much bribe money he took from rich Jews, to do their bidding. And then laughing about it.
How about it Deanna? How does that square with your ‘white advocacy’? Sometimes I just don’t know what these people can be thinking.
Thanks, xyzxy. You’ve completely demolished my naive comment. The points you make are irrefutable.
You mention “going forward.” Is it possible to “go forward?”
I’m reminded of the captain of the Titanic when advised of icebergs:
States’ Rights Bro.
In the next article I think Gregory should discuss the Jewish role in the great replacement. That way he can prove he’s not a dirty little shabos goy.
There are now major population centers within the US that are completely decoupled ethnically, culturally, historically and politically from what is traditionally thought of as America. The leaders of these areas are no more Democrats than cats are dogs. And their constituents no more American than birds are fish. The term Democrat should be considered as merely an expedient transitory label for the Neo-communist banner under which these people operate and owe their ideological allegiance.
By Neo-communism, I mean a totalitarian racially egalitarian society with enforced gender ambiguity and DIE-speak; the dystopia in which you will own nothing, be rendered completely powerless and be happy or else. That of which we have all already gotten a sneak peak during Covid and the Biden regime. That of which its Zio-Globalist proponents have spoken openly and glowingly.
What they do not speak of openly – because there is no way to spin it glowingly – is that Neo-communism will be managed externally by a Zio-Globalist billionaire elite. And it will use all the psychological and physical coercion techniques developed and employed by CIA/Mossad to control and, if need be, terrorize their human populations into submission.
The Zio-Globalist elites, in order to carry out their mandate “objectively”, will live completely apart from the collective masses that they manage and will continue to enjoy absolute freedom, opulence and splendor. They will be able to engage in every fantasy and indulgence, including that of seeing themselves as the ultimate embodiment of benevolence and altruism while simultaneously picking your child off the street for a human sacrifice ritual. And so it is by this enlightened external control that they plan to make communism work for the useless eaters this time around and how their sociopathic apparatchiks will be kept accountable and their populations under control.
That is precisely the end-game. As a consequence of the decoupling of these large populations centers from America as a whole, America has never been more vulnerable to internal fragmentation and collapse. But there is more.
America is on the list for color revolution by these Neo-communist forces. Of this we can be certain. And if the Trumpists do not immediately and aggressively counter these elements, then such an outcome becomes, in my estimation, almost inevitable.
Consider that the means to bring a color revolution about in the US is already in place. The primary architects of this insidious evil are Western intelligence agencies themselves. Likely in conjunction with the Mossad, these agencies have developed and carried out these types of psychological operations within a framework of what they call cognitive warfare, oftentimes successfully. It can also be safely assumed, therefore, that any details related to such operations not already privy to the Mossad will have been shared with or stolen by them.
I believe that it is also a given that there are Neo-communist sympathizers embedded high within the CIA. The “former” Director John Brennan is likely such an actor and would play an active role in bringing about such a color revolution here in the US. It is also very plausible at this juncture that the preponderance of sympathies in the upper ranks of the CIA probably lean Neo-communist. This is a rogue organization and must be dismantled immediately.
On other fronts, a source that cannot be named has suggested – on the basis of psycho-linguistic evidence – that such elements sympathetic to Neo-communism are embedded in contractor or civilian support roles at the Pentagon.
I have also been made aware of other unspecified yet idiosyncratic events that, if taken as part of the larger picture, could very well indicative of further tears in the domestic and geopolitical fabric. That is, it is likely that these events point to sides being taken and lines being drawn.
This is a dark backdrop and the implications should be clear. I believe America is on the cusp of a color revolution. Should the social and demographic conditions worsen, the opportunity will eventually present itself and the trigger will be pulled, most likely from within.
It remains to be seen whether the Trumpists will act decisively and conclusively, or if Neo-communism is the future of the West.