Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to Github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@dimaMachina
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 16, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7a23b09

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
agents-docs Building Building Preview, Comment Jan 16, 2026 11:36pm
agents-manage-api Building Building Preview, Comment Jan 16, 2026 11:36pm
agents-manage-ui Building Building Preview, Comment Jan 16, 2026 11:36pm
agents-run-api Building Building Preview, Comment Jan 16, 2026 11:36pm

Request Review

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Claude finished @dimaMachina's task —— View job


PR Review: Vercel Skills for Cursor/Codex/Claude

I've conducted a comprehensive engineering review of this PR. This change adds Vercel's React best practices as skills for AI coding assistants (Cursor, Codex, and Claude).

Analysis Summary

Structure & Organization:

  • Main skill content: Located in .cursor/skills/ with 54 total files
  • Cross-platform support: Symlinks from .claude/skills and .codex/skills to .cursor/skills for consistency
  • Content volume: 2,410+ lines of comprehensive React/Next.js guidance

Engineering Assessment

Strengths

1. Comprehensive Content Quality

  • Well-structured 45 performance rules across 8 priority categories (Critical → Low)
  • Each rule includes impact metrics, incorrect/correct examples, and context
  • Priority-based approach (waterfalls, bundle size as critical) aligns with real performance impact

2. Smart Architecture

  • Symlink approach eliminates code duplication while supporting multiple AI platforms
  • Clear separation between skill metadata (SKILL.md) and comprehensive content (AGENTS.md)
  • Modular rule organization in individual files for maintainability

3. Production-Ready Content

  • Rules are based on real Vercel engineering practices and measurement
  • Concrete performance metrics (200-800ms import cost, 2-10× improvements)
  • Platform-specific optimizations (Next.js 13.5+ features)

⚠️ Areas for Consideration

1. Repository Scope & Purpose Alignment

  • Context mismatch: This repo appears to be for "Inkeep Agent Framework" (multi-agent AI system), but we're adding generic React best practices
  • Question: Should Vercel's React skills be in a general-purpose agents repository, or in a dedicated skills/knowledge repository?

2. Maintenance & Ownership Strategy

.cursor/skills/vercel-react-best-practices/
├── SKILL.md (metadata: author: vercel, version: 1.0.0)
├── AGENTS.md (2,410 lines of rules)
└── rules/ (45 individual rule files)
  • Versioning: Content is marked as v1.0.0 but no update mechanism defined
  • Upstream sync: No clear strategy for keeping Vercel's evolving best practices in sync
  • Ownership: Marked as "author: vercel" but maintained in Inkeep's repo

3. Content Scope & Applicability

  • Very specific domain: Heavily React/Next.js focused in a general agent framework
  • Scale: 5,017 lines of additions for specialized knowledge
  • Future precedent: Could lead to similar PRs for other framework-specific best practices

🔍 System Design Considerations

1. Skills Discovery & Loading

  • No clear mechanism shown for how agents discover or load these skills
  • Missing integration with the existing agent framework patterns
  • No validation of skill format compatibility across platforms

2. Configuration Management

# From SKILL.md
name: vercel-react-best-practices
description: React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines...
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: vercel
  version: "1.0.0"
  • License clarity: MIT license declared but unclear if that applies to usage in this context
  • Version management: No migration strategy for skill updates

3. Integration Points

  • Missing: No examples of how these skills integrate with existing agents
  • Documentation gap: No updates to main agent documentation explaining skills usage

📋 Recommendations

Immediate (Must Address)

  1. Add changeset - This introduces new functionality and should have a changeset per repository guidelines:

    pnpm bump minor --pkg agents-core "Add Vercel React best practices skills for AI coding assistants"
  2. Clarify repository scope - Add documentation explaining:

    • Why React-specific skills belong in this agent framework
    • How skills relate to the core agent system
    • Guidelines for future skill contributions

Short-term (Should Consider)

  1. Skills integration documentation - Update agents-docs/ with:

    • How to use these skills with different AI platforms
    • Skill format specification
    • Contributing guidelines for new skills
  2. Maintenance strategy - Define process for:

    • Updating skills content from upstream sources
    • Version management and compatibility
    • Testing skill effectiveness

Long-term (Strategic)

  1. Skills architecture - Consider whether this warrants:
    • Dedicated skills package (agents-skills?)
    • Skills registry/discovery mechanism
    • Automated skill validation

🎯 Verdict

Approve with modifications - The content quality is excellent and the technical approach is sound, but this PR needs context and integration clarity before merge.

Risk Assessment: Low technical risk, medium organizational risk due to scope expansion without clear strategy.

Todo List:

  • Read repository guidelines and context (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md)
  • Analyze skill file structure and organization
  • Review content quality and consistency
  • Evaluate system design and architectural decisions
  • Check for security and performance considerations
  • Assess maintainability and extensibility
  • Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants