Abstract
WordGen is an easy-to-use program that uses the CELEX and Lexique lexical databases for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Items can be generated in these four languages, specifying any combination of seven linguistic constraints: number of letters, neighborhood size, frequency, summated position-nonspecific bigram frequency, minimum position-nonspecific bigram frequency, position-specific frequency of the initial and final bigram, and orthographic relatedness. The program also has a module to calculate the respective values of these variables for items that have already been constructed, either with the program or taken from earlier studies. Stimulus queries can be entered through WordGen’s graphical user interface or by means of batch files. WordGen is especially useful for (1) Dutch and German item generation, because no such stimulus-selection tool exists for these languages, (2) the generation of nonwords for all four languages, because our program has some important advantages over previous nonword generation approaches, and (3) psycholinguistic experiments on bilingualism, because the possibility of using the same tool for different languages increases the cross-linguistic comparability of the generated item lists. WordGen is free and available athttp://expsy.ugent.be/wordgen.htm.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15,802–814.
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18234–254.
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T. &Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model.Journal of Memory & Language,37,94–117.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &van Run, H. (1993).The CELEX lexical data base [CD-ROM]: Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &van Run, H. (1995).The CELEX lexical data base [CD-ROM 2nd Release]: Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Bertram, R., &Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 615–634.
Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Meot, A., &Fayol, M. (2001). Age-of-acquisition and word frequency in the lexical decision task: Further evidence from the French language.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition,20, 401–443.
Brysbaert, M. (2001). Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: Automatic after all.Memory & Cognition,29,765–773.
Brysbaert, M., Lange, M., &Van Wijnendaele, I. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,12,65–85.
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973). Age of acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12,563–576.
Chumbley, J. I., &Balota, D. A. (1984). A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.Memory & Cognition,12,590–606.
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33(A), 497–505.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). London: Academic Press.
Damian, M. F., &Bowers, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 119–132.
Förster, K. I., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12,627–635.
Förster, K. I., &Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime-awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24,498–514.
Gerhand, S., &Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24,267–283.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113,256–281.
Gilhooly, K. J. (1984). Word age-of-acquisition and residence time in lexical memory as factors in word naming.Current Psychological Research,3, 24–31.
Grainger, J. (1990). Word-frequency and neighborhood frequency-effects in lexical decision and naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29,228–244.
Grainger, J., &Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons.Journal of Memory & Language,35,623–647.
Howes, D. H., &Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41,401–410.
Izura, C., &Ellis, A. W. (2004). Age of acquisition effects in translation judgement tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,50, 165–181.
Locker, L., Jr.,Simpson, G. B., &Yates, M. (2003). Semantic neighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words.Memory & Cognition,31,505–515.
Martensen, H., Maris, E., &Dijkstra, T. (2003). Phonological ambiguity and context sensitivity: On sublexical clustering in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 375–395.
McCann, R. S., &Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word frequency effects in naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13,14–24.
Miller, K., &Swick, M. D. (2003). Orthography influences the perception of speech in alexic patients.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15,981–990.
Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word-frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21,116–133.
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Segui, J., Ferrand, L., &Rastle, K. (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English.Journal of Memory & Language,51, 568–585.
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., &Ferrand, L. (2004).Lexique 2: A new French lexical database.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36,516–524.
Peereman, R., &Content, A. (1999). LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography—phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31,376–379.
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., &Coltheart, M. (2002). 358, 534 non-words: The ARC nonword database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A,1339–1362.
Rice, G. A., &Robinson, D. O. (1975). The role of bigram frequency in the perception of words and nonwords.Memory & Cognition,3, 513–518.
Rumelhart, D. E., &Siple, P. (1974). Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words.Psychological Review,81,99–118.
Slowiaczek, L. M., Soltano, E. G., Wieting, S. J., &Bishop, K. L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A,233–262.
van Hell, J. G., &Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9,780–789.
van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., &Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,39,458–483.
van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., &Schriefers, H. (2001). Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8,96–101.
Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 439–456.
Westbury, C., &Buchanan, L. (2002). The probability of the least likely non—length-controlled bigram affects lexical decision reaction times.Brain & Language,81,66–78.
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word—nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17,143–154.
Yates, M., Locker, L. Jr., &Simpson, G. B. (2003). Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones.Memory & Cognition,31,856–866.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was made possible by the Research Foundation-Flanders (F.W.O.-Vlaanderen, Belgium), of which W.D. and T.D. are postdoctoral fellows.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duyck, W., Desmet, T., Verbeke, L.P.C. et al. WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36, 488–499 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195595
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195595