Improve search #1167
Improve search #1167
Conversation
|
Could this be added to the API as well, if that wasn't already planned? |
|
I need a PR template that asks whether you have thought about thw API 😂😂😂 |
|
I will add it to this PR when I work on it the next time |
|
Change the branch. This is the main branch. |
I will, but boy this tone is not the right one... |
I'm not at home. I was just responding quickly. |
7b8a9f2 to
d07c5c3
Compare
e12ecee to
1f78291
Compare
d07c5c3 to
fa6f302
Compare
1f78291 to
b69ef85
Compare
fa6f302 to
09a90b4
Compare
- only search a specific magazine - only search posts from a specific user - only search a specific type: threads, microblogs or both
b69ef85 to
cc590cc
Compare
|
Now we also need to remove this security check from the dev/* branch pattern settings. |
|
Could it not also run here? |
|
What do you mean? The audit-check replaces it. You can remove the security-check from the mandatory checks in the dev branch protection settings. |
- in the search API add the new parameters - improve the user retrieve API to search for users
|
Never mind about my previous comment (deleted), only integrate the button with the input field that would be cool enough. Like this: |
|
Also "Both" isn't saying much if people didn't look at the drop-down options. You want to make it explicit here, like "Threads + Microblogs": Otherwise at first glace you don't know what you are looking at: "both .. what?.." |
Maybe "all types"? |
|
Even then people don't know what you mean with 'type'? What kind of type? What type? |
|
I changed it to your suggestion :) |
UI changes
Closes #1148, closes #844