Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Game Systems #5445

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 16, 2024
Merged

Game Systems #5445

merged 9 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

@SJuliez
Copy link
Member

@SJuliez SJuliez commented May 3, 2024

This is another step towards supporting other game types, oriented mostly towards SBF, but the AbstractGame and AbstractGameManager changes will benefit all. As before this PR should ideally not show any visible changes.
The code changes are:

  • moved up deployment table handling from Game to AbstractGame and removed the focus on Entity
  • added a Deployable interface for deployable units/objects. This is distinct from InGameObject as there are InGameObjects such as HexTarget that cant be deployed. It is possible that having Targetable extend InGameObject was not a wise move by me
  • moved up the pendingActions list to AbstractGame
  • moves the answer to "should this phase be skipped now" from GamePhase into the *Game classes as this is game and situation specific
  • copied a whole lot of phase handling from GameManager to SBFGameManager. Most of it is commented out but I added a bit of working stuff. I try to work through the steps but this can't be done in one PR. SBFGameManager is already 1000 lines without doing much so it's a worthy companion to GameManager :)

I ran the tests, played a game with Princess and pulled these changes into MHQ and started a story arc fight. All seemed to work.

github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security bot found potential problems May 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
@HammerGS
Copy link
Member

HammerGS commented May 16, 2024

Now has conflicts.

Sleet01
Sleet01 reviewed May 16, 2024
View reviewed changes
megamek/src/megamek/common/Game.java Outdated
private int victoryTeam = Player.TEAM_NONE;

private Hashtable<Integer, Vector<Entity>> deploymentTable = new Hashtable<>();
// private Hashtable<Integer, Vector<Entity>> deploymentTable = new Hashtable<>();
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sleet01 Sleet01 May 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please clean this up.

Sleet01
Sleet01 requested changes May 16, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sleet01 Sleet01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One commented line, and a few codeQL notices that should be cleaned up (I believe the style guide calls out @override as being required).

Other than that, looks good - very exciting!

SJuliez added 4 commits May 16, 2024 22:44
@SJuliez
Merge branch 'refs/heads/master' into SBF-step
808f496
@SJuliez
cleanup
1856c2b
@SJuliez
Merge branch 'refs/heads/master' into SBF-step
3619124 
# Conflicts:
#	megamek/src/megamek/common/strategicBattleSystems/SBFGame.java
#	megamek/src/megamek/server/SBFGameManager.java
@SJuliez
cleanup
0a53aba
@SJuliez
Copy link
Member Author

SJuliez commented May 16, 2024

OK cleaned up. I believe the missing overrides were in the other PR, but I corrected them. Not seeing any warnings here.

@HammerGS HammerGS merged commit 2d8b33f into MegaMek:master May 16, 2024
@SJuliez SJuliez deleted the SBF-step branch May 19, 2024 14:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Sleet01 Sleet01 Sleet01 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SJuliez @HammerGS @Sleet01