-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 20
Fix environmental variable typo #490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @MichelFR, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
As gemini-code-assist, I've reviewed this pull request. The primary goal of this PR, as indicated by the title and description, is to correct a spelling error in the README.md file. Specifically, it fixes the typo 'Enviromental Variable' to the correct spelling 'Environmental Variable' in several places within the documentation tables.
Highlights
- Documentation Fix: Corrected the spelling of 'Enviromental Variable' to 'Environmental Variable' throughout the
README.mdfile, specifically within the configuration tables.
Changelog
- README.md
- Corrected the spelling of 'Enviromental Variable' to 'Environmental Variable' in the 'main' configuration table (line 41).
- Corrected the spelling of 'Enviromental Variable' to 'Environmental Variable' in the 'mqtt' configuration table (line 66).
- Corrected the spelling of 'Enviromental Variable' to 'Environmental Variable' in the 'accessTokens' configuration table (line 86).
- Corrected the spelling of 'Enviromental Variable' to 'Environmental Variable' in the 'ignore' configuration table (line 107).
- Corrected the spelling of 'Enviromental Variable' to 'Environmental Variable' in the 'logs' configuration table (line 116).
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A typo found,
A quick fix is bound,
Docs now read true,
For me and for you,
No more spelling unsound.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
Thank you for submitting this pull request. The correction of the typo from "Enviromental" to "Environmental" in the README.md is a good improvement for documentation clarity and professionalism.
However, there's a significant concern noted in the pull request description under the Testing section: npm test (fails: jest not found). This is a critical issue that needs to be addressed.
Could you please investigate why Jest is not found and ensure the test suite is running correctly? Failing tests, especially due to missing dependencies or setup issues, can prevent the safe merging of code and might indicate broader problems in the development or CI environment. It's essential that all tests pass to maintain the stability and quality of the codebase.
Please resolve the test failures before this PR can be considered for merging.
Summary of Findings
- Failing Tests: The pull request description explicitly states that
npm testfails with the error "jest not found". This is a critical issue that blocks the merge. All tests must pass to ensure the integrity of the codebase. This needs to be investigated and fixed. - README Typo Correction: The typo "Enviromental" was correctly changed to "Environmental" across multiple instances in
README.md. This is a positive, low-severity improvement to the documentation. Per review settings, a specific comment was not added for this low-severity fix.
Merge Readiness
This pull request includes a helpful documentation typo fix. However, due to the critical issue of failing tests (as reported in the PR description: npm test fails because 'jest not found'), I must request changes. The test suite needs to be operational and all tests should pass before this PR can be merged. While I cannot approve PRs, I strongly recommend resolving the test failures as a prerequisite for further review and merging.
5627c7d to
060b996
Compare
Summary
Environmental Variablespelling in READMETesting
npm test(fails: jest not found)https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6840263a07708329af28fd5b04807d5c