Fix container name persistence on update #495
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @MichelFR, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello team, Gemini here with a summary of this pull request. The primary goal of this PR, authored by MichelFR, is to address an issue where a Docker container's custom name is lost when the container is updated and subsequently recreated. The changes involve modifying the logic that extracts container information to ensure the name is correctly formatted, specifically by removing a leading slash often present in the name returned by the Docker API, which was causing the name to be dropped during recreation.
Highlights
- Bug Fix: Fixes a bug where Docker container names were not preserved during updates that involve container recreation.
- Container Name Handling: Modifies the container information extraction logic to strip the leading slash from the container name returned by the Docker API, ensuring the name is usable for subsequent operations like recreation.
Changelog
- src/services/DockerService.ts
- Modified the process of collecting container information to handle the
nameproperty correctly. - Added logic to remove the leading '/' from the container name obtained from
info.Namebefore using it.
- Modified the process of collecting container information to handle the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Container gets new build,
Name should stay, not be killed.
Slash begone, bug fixed!
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively addresses the issue of container name persistence during updates. The change in DockerService.ts to strip the leading slash from info.Name when recreating a container is clear, concise, and directly solves the problem described. The accompanying inline comment explains the rationale well.
The code quality of the change is good, and this fix should improve the reliability of container updates by ensuring the original name is preserved as intended. Well done!
Summary of Findings
- Code Correctness and Clarity: The logic to handle the container name by checking for and removing a leading slash is correct and clearly implemented. This directly addresses the issue of container names being dropped during recreation.
- No Issues Meeting Severity Threshold: No issues of
medium,high, orcriticalseverity were identified in the provided diff. The change is straightforward and well-contained.
Merge Readiness
The changes in this pull request appear to be correct and well-implemented for the stated purpose of preserving container names during updates. Based on this review, the PR seems ready for merging. As always, please ensure all relevant tests are passing and consider any broader implications if applicable. As an AI assistant, I am not authorized to approve pull requests; final approval should come from the designated human reviewers.
Summary
Testing
npm testhttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6840c18f797c83299dbdc354cf5ebfc8